1.

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
At present world, there is rapid emersion of the new technologies related to safe, economical,
stable construction. In such a trend, earthquake has become one of the natural challenging factor
for the efficient construction works. It is one of the dominant constraints while designing the frame
building in the earthquake prone zone like Nepal. Earthquake is a natural phenomenon as old as
the history of the earth itself and is considered to be most unpredictable one among all other natural
disasters. Now a days, designers and engineers are giving more emphasis towards the earthquake
resistance while analyzing and designing any structure to minimize the seismic impact.
One being a good designer has to deal with various structures ranging from simple ones like the
curtailment rods, and electric poles to more complex ones like multi-storied frame buildings, shell
roofs, bridges etc. These structures are subjected to various loads like concentrated loads,
uniformly distributed loads, uniformly varying loads, internal or earthquake load and dynamic
forces which are considered during the design phase. The structure transfers its load to the supports
and ultimately to the ground. While transferring the loads, the members of the structure are
subjected to internal forces like axial forces, shearing forces, bending and torsional moments which
are discussed while analyzing the structures.
First of all the most appropriate structural system and initial proportioning of members is done.
Generally the initial drawing of architecture is referred. After that the loads are estimated based on
functionality and purpose of building based on codes. Then the process of structural analysis and
design evolves.
Structural Analysis deals with the prediction of performance of a given structure under loads and
other external effects. Structural design deals with the designing (sizing: member sizes,
reinforcement details and grading of materials) various members of the structure to resist various
forces to which they might be subjected during the life period of the structure. While analysis,
frames are analyzed for earthquake as lateral or horizontal load. During the earthquake, structural
and non-structural damages occur in which both of them are hazardous to occupants. When
earthquake shaking occurs, a building gets thrown from side to side or up and down. i.e. ground
moves violently side by side and building stay at rest. Thus the building gets thrown back and forth
by the motion of the ground with some part of building lagging behind and then moving in the
opposite direction. The level of damage depends upon how well the building has been designed
and constructed.
In our context, the analysis of earthquake is based on seismic coefficient design method as
described in IS 1893: 2002.
The project report has been prepared in complete conformity with various provisions in Indian
Standards as Code of practice for plain & reinforced concrete IS 456-2000; Code of practice for
Design loads IS 875 (Part 2)-1987: Design Aids for Reinforcement Concrete (SP 16) IS 456-1978;
Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing SP 34 (1987) are thoroughly referred for
proper analysis, design and detailing of structural elements viz. beam, slab, column, staircase,
foundation, basement wall, lift and shear wall with respect to safety, strength, stability, ductility &
economy in addition to adequate serviceability requirements of cracking and deflection in concrete
structures. All the codes are based on the principles of limit state of design.
The project report possess modeling output (SAP 2000), analysis results, load calculations,
architectural drawings, structural drawings and sample calculations of various structural elements
and their detailing as well.
1.2 Objective of the project
1.2.1 Main Objective:
 To achieve a practical knowledge on structural analysis, design and detailing of structural
components using principles of Earthquake resistant design
1.2.2 Specific objectives:
 Modeling of the building for structural analysis.
 Sectional design and structural detailing of the members.
1.3 Scope of the project
1. Identification of the building and requirement of the space
2. Determination of the structural system of the building to undertake the vertical and
horizontal loads
3. Estimation of loads including those due to earthquake
4. Calculation of base shear and vertical distribution of equivalent earthquake load
5. The structural analysis of the building by SAP2000 for different cases of loads
6. Design of RC frame members, walls, mat foundation, staircases and other by limit state
method of design
7. Detailing of individual members and preparation of drawings as a part of working
construction document.
1.4 Basic description of building
 Building type: Commercial building
 Project site: Krishnagalli
 Plinth area:
 Number of storey: 5 (excluding basement and roof)
 Floor height:
o Basement: 3.502m
o First- Fifth floor: 3.962m
 Seismic zone: V
 Type of soil: Medium soil

1.5 Elements of building

 Foundation
 Structure: Beam, column and slab
 Walls
 Vertical transport system: Lift and staircase
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Identification of loads
Dead loads are calculated as per IS 875(Part 1) – 1987
Seismic loads are taken according to IS 1893(Part 1)-2002 considering job site in Kathmandu
located at Zone V.
Imposed load are taken according to IS 875(Part 2) – 1987
2.2 Loading pattern
The loading is applied to the slab elements directly. The total load on the staircase is equally
distributed on both supporting beams and the load is converted to UDL. The load on slab is taken
as per the requirement stated in IS875:1987(Part I & II).
Dead loads are computed from the dimension of the dimensions of the structural member such as
walls, beams, slabs etc. and their material densities conforming to IS875 (Part I). Similarly, live
loads are to be chosen from IS875 (Part II) for various required material along with live loads I
various parts of building are listed.
The uniformly distributed dead and live load acting on the slab are transferred to the beams holding
the slab. The slab load is distributed on the floor beams as shown in figure below. The smaller
beam holds the triangular load and the longer beams hold the trapezoidal load as shown in figure.
The beam element also resists the self-weight and the wall load including all the finish loads on
wall such as external and internal plaster.

2.3 Analysis
2.3.1 Load calculation
There are three types of loads for which are considered in this analysis.
1. Dead load
2. Live load
3. Lateral load
Dead load
Dead load consists of the self-weight of the column, beam, slab and wall. Dimensions of column,
beam, and slab were taken from preliminary design. For wall load, thickness of wall was taken
from plan, deduction of opening was done according to the average size of opening in the outer
and inner walls and deduction was not made in solid wall. In the case of the partition wall in the
middle of slab, the total weight of the wall was calculated as uniformly distributed load and assign
over the nearest beam.
Live load
Live load was determined by using code for design loads (IS 875:2000 part 2) for various types
and purposes of rooms.
Lateral load
Lateral load acting in the building is earthquake/seismic load and wind load. Earthquake load is
determined by calculating lumped mass at floor level and horizontal base shear (IS 1893). It was
done by Seismic Coefficient Method. Wind load (IS 875 Part 3) is obtained by design wind speed
and design wind pressure. Earthquake load being the pre-dominant one between the two lateral
loads, hence its effect was only considered.
2.3.2 Load combination
Load cases are independent loading for which the structure is explicitly analyzed. Earthquake
forces occur in random fashion in all directions. For building whose lateral load resisting elements
are oriented in two principal directions. It is usually sufficient to analyze in these two principal
directions (X and Y direction) separately one at a time. Thus the load cases adopted are as follows.
1. Dead load(DL)
2. Live load(LL)
3. Earthquake load in X direction (EQX)
4. Earthquake load in Y direction (EQY)
Following load combination are adopted for design

a) 1.5 (DL ± LL) e) 1.2 (DL + LL ± EQY)

b) 1.5 (DL + LL ± EQX) f) 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EQX
c) 1.5 (DL + LL ± EQY) g) 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EQY
d) 1.2 (DL + LL ± EQX)

2.4 Understanding and Design philosophies

2.4.1 Background
The aim of design is the achievement of an acceptable probability that structure being designed
will perform satisfactorily during their intended life. We are mainly dealing with seismic analysis
and structural design of RCC framed concrete structure. Structure and structural element shall
normally be designed by limit state method.
Design philosophies
There are three philosophies for the design of reinforced concrete.
1. l. Working stress method
2. Ultimate load method
3. Limit state method
Working stress method:
The working stress method of design is based on the behavior of structure at working load. The
stress distribution in concrete and steel at working load is assumed to be linear. Hence the design
is made by assuming the linear stress-strain relationship ensuring that the stresses in steel and
concrete do not exceed their permissible values at service load which is taken as the fixed
proportion of the ultimate or yield strength of the material.
Ultimate load method:
This is an aspect of limit design, which confines the structural usefulness up to the plastic strength
or ultimate load carrying capacity. This method is based on failure condition rather than working
load condition. In plastic design method, working load is multiplied by load factor and the cross
section of members is selected and design on the basis of collapse strength.
Limit state method:
It is a judicious amalgamation of working stress method and ultimate load method, removing the
drawback of both of these methods but retaining their good points. In the method of design based
on the limit state concept, the structure shall be designed to withstand safely a loads liable to act
on it throughout its life; it shall also satisfied the serviceability requirements, such as limitation on
deflection and cracking should be based on characteristics value for materials strength and applied
load .The designed value are derived in characteristic value through the use of partial factor of
safety for load and strength.
2.4.2 Assumptions for limit state for flexure members (IS 456:2000, clause 38.1)
a. Plane sections normal to the axis of the member remain plane alter bending
b. The maximum strain in concrete at the outer most compression fiber is 0.0035
c. The relationship between the compressive stress distribution in concrete and the strain in
concrete may be assumed to be rectangle, trapezoid, parabola or any other shape which
results in prediction of strength in Substantial agreement with the results of text. For design
purposes, the compressive strength of concrete in the structure shall be assumed to be 0.67
times the characteristics strength. The partial safety factor 1.5 shall be applied in addition
to this.
d. The tensile strength of concrete is ignored.
e. The stresses in the reinforcement are derived from representative stress-strain curve for the
type of steel used. For the design Purposes the partial safety factor 1.5 shall be applied.
f. The maximum strain in the tension reinforcement in the section at failure shall not be less
than: 0 002+0.87fy/Es where, fy = characteristics strength of steel Es = modulus of
elasticity of steel.
2.4.3 Assumption for compression members (IS 456:2000. Clause 39.1)
In addition to the assumptions given above from a to f for flexure, the following shall be assumed:
a. The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression is taken as 0.002.
b. The maximum compressive strain in the highly compressed extreme fiber in concrete
subjected to axial compression and bending and when there is no tension shall be 0.0035 minus
0.75 Ecmin
Limit state of collapse:
The limit state of collapse of structure could be assessed from rupture of one or more critical
section and from buckling due to elastic or plastic instability or overturning. The resistance to
bending, shear, torsion and axial load at every section should not be less than the value at the
section produced by the most unfavorable combination of loud using partial factor of safety.
Limit state or serviceability:
This state correspond to the development of the excessive defamation and is use for checking
members in which magnitude of defamation may limit the use of the structure or its component.
This state may corresponds to: m Deflection b. cracking c. Vibration
a. Control of deflection: The deflection of a structure or part there of shall not adversely
affect the appearance or efficiency of the structure or finishes or partitions. The deflection
shall generally be limited by span to depth ratio given in clause 23.2.] IS 456: 2000.
b. Control of cracking: Cracking of concrete should not adversely affect the appearance or
durability of the structure. Design consideration for crack control would require the
following:
 Expression for crack width and spacing(Annex F of is 456:2000)
 Allowable crack width under different service condition with due consideration
corrosion and durability of concrete(Clause 35.3.2 is 4562000)
 Unless the calculation of crack width shows that a greater spacing is acceptable, for
the flexure member in normal internal or external condition of exposure, the
maximum distance between bars intension shall not exceed the value as given in
456:2000, clause 26.3.
 Cracks due to bending in compression member subjected to design axial load >0.2
fck * Ac, need not be checked. For flexural members if greater spacing of
reinforcement as given in clause 2632, IS 456:2000 is required, the expected crack
width should be checked by formula given in Annex F of IS 456:2000.
c. Control of vibration: A dynamic load is any load of which the magnitude, direction or
position varies with the time and almost any RCG structural system may be subjected to
one form of another loading during its life time. Similarly structural response i.e. resulting
stresses or deflection is also time varying of dynamic and is express in terms of
displacement.
2.5 Earthquake Resistance Design of Structure
2.5.1 Assumption
a. Earthquake causes impulsive ground motions, which are complex and irregular in
Character, changing in period and amplitude is lasting for a small duration. Therefore
resonance of the type as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitations will not occur
as it would need time to build up such amplitudes.
b. Earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind or maximum flood or maximum
sea waves.
c. The value of elastic modulus of materials, wherever required, may be taken as for static
analysis unless a more definite value is available for use in such condition.
The criteria adopted by codes for fixing the level of the design seismic loading are generally as
follows:
a. Structure should be able to resist minor earthquake without damage
b. Structure should be able to resist moderate earthquake without significant structural
damage, but with some non-structural damage and
c. Structure should be able to resist major earthquake without collapse but with some
structural as well as non-structural damage.
There are basically two methods to determine the earthquake force in the building:
a. Seismic coefficient method or static method
b. Response spectrum method or modal analysis or spectral acceleration method or dynamic
method.
The seismic coefficient method is generally applicable to building up to 40 m height and those are
more or less symmetrical in plan and elevation.
18: 1893(Part I) 2002 states that for the calculation of the design seismic forces of the
structure the imposed load on roof need not be considered. The seismic weights and the base
Shear have been computed as below:
2.5.2 Shear Wall
A shear wall is a structural system providing stability against wind, earthquake and blast deriving
its stiffness from inherent structural forms. The shear wall can be either planar, open sections, or
closed sections around elevators and stair cores. These systems either can be constructed in steel
or concrete or may either be solid or perforated. The shear walls behave as deep and slender
cantilevers. Structurally these can be divided into coupled shear walls, shear wall frames, shear
panel and staggered wall into two walls coupled by beams at each floor.
Advantages of shear wall in the buildings.
Shear walls are easy to construct, because reinforcement detailing of walls is relatively straight
forward and therefore easily implemented at site.
Shear walls are efficient, both interims of construction cost and effectiveness in minimizing
earthquake damage in structural and non-structural elements like glass, windows and building
contents.
2.6 Codes of practice
Following are the codes of practice developed by Bureau of Indian Standard were followed in the
analysis and design of building.
1. IS 456:2000 (code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete)
2. IS 1893 (Part I) (code for Earthquake resistant design an structures)
3. IS 875 (Part I) ( to assess the dead load)
4. IS 875 (Part II) (to assess live load)
5. SP 16 (design aid for reinforced concrete)
6. IS 13290:1993
7. SP 34

3. METHODOLOGY
To proceed any sorts work, various methods or steps are adopted from its initial stage to final
stage. Following are some of the methods been adopted during the analysis and design:
3.1 Study of the Architectural Drawing
Initially, the architectural drawing of the building was studied. Rooms within the building were
allocated to various purpose such as office, laboratory room, toilet, seminar hall etc.
3.2 Preliminary Design
Estimation of various structural elements such as beam, column we designed and checks were
done with the help of deflection criteria and moment criteria. For the column, vertical axial
capacity was taken for the design and percentage of steel was checked.
3.3 Load Calculation
After the study of drawing and preliminary design, load calculation was done. In vertical direction,
dead load was obtained by the size determined in preliminary design and live load was determined
by using code for design loads (IS 375 part II). In horizontal direction, earthquake load was
determined by calculating lumped mass at floor level for each frame and then horizontal base shear
was calculated by Seismic Coefficient Method (IS 1893:2002). Earthquake load being pro-
dominate between two lateral loads, its effect only was considered
3.4 Modeling and Analysis
The building is modeled as a space frame. SAP2016 is adopted as the basic tool for the execution
of analysis. SAP2016 program is based on Finite Element Method. Due to possible actions in the
building, the stresses, displacements and fundamental time periods are obtained using SAP2016
which are used for the design of the members.
Initially, the characteristics of the materials used were defined such as concrete M20, and
reinforcement Fe415. Then, the load cases as well as their combination with load factors were
introduced. Structures were then analyzed for different load combinations and the final output was
determined in the form of Bending Moment, Shear Force, Torsion and Axial Force.
4. PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS
Preliminary design is carried out to estimate approximate size of the structural members. Grid
diagram is taken as basic guideline for analysis. Preliminary design of flexural members of the
structural system i.e. for beam and slab are done as per the limit state of serviceability. Work out
is done from deflection criteria and moment criteria. And for column, it was done from net vertical
axial load capacity assuming suitable percentage of steel.
The principal purpose for preliminary design of any structure is:
 Obtained a clear picture of structural action
 Established the dimensions of structure
 Use the preliminary design as a check on the final design
 The preliminary bridges the gap between the design concept and the detail phase.

4.1 Design data

4.1.1 Construction Material

Concrete Grade : M25

Steel Grade : Fe415

 Live load on slab : 5 KN/m2 (IS 875-1964 Table I)

Live load on staircase : 3 KN/m2 (IS 875-1964 Table I)

Live load on roof : 3 KN/m2 (IS 875-1964 Table II)

RCC Specific Weight : 25KN/m3

4.1.2 Preliminary design of elements

Design of primary beam
Largest clear span of the beam (L) = 32’5”=9880.6mm
Now, using deflection criteria
(l/d) < (l/d) basic *α*β*γ
Effective depth (d)>=span/ ((l/d) basic* α*β*γ)
(l/d) basic= 23 and Assuming α*β*γ = 1
d>=429.6mm
Adopting d = 440mm and cover = 40mm
Total depth (D) = 480mm
Assume, b/D= 0.8
b = 384mm
Adopting b = 390mm
Size of primary beam = 480mm * 390mm

Design of secondary beam

Depth of beam = 0.75*d
= 0.75*440mm
=293.33mm
=295mm
Providing cover=40mm
Providing total depth (D) = 335mm
Width of Beam = 0.8*D
b = 0.8*335
=268mm=270mm
Size of secondary beam = 335mm*270mm

Design of slab
Longer clear span(Ly) =29’11”= 9118.6mm
Shorter clear span (Lx) =29’3” = 8915.4mm
Ratio of long to short span
LY/LX=9118.6/8915.4=1.02<2
So, two way slab is designed.
From deflection control criteria,
For effective depth of the slab,
(l/d)> (l/d) basic * α *β*γ
d>=8915.4/23*1.5
d>=258.42mm
d >= (258.42mm) >160mm
So, there is a need of secondary beam.
Now,
When secondary beam is introduced in one direction,
Providing Beam in the direction perpendicular to longer span
So,
Shorter clear span (Lx) = 4559.3mm
Longer clear span(Ly) = 8915.4mm

Bending occurs in shorter span. So,

Effective span of the slab (lx) =4559.3mm

For effective depth of the slab,

(l/d)> (l/d) basic * α*β*γ
(4559.3/d)>23*1.5
d>132.1536
d = 135mm <150mm
Providing cover=30mm
Total depth = 165mm (>160mm)
So, secondary beam should be introduced in both directions
Shorter clear span (Lx) = 4457.7mm
Longer clear span(Ly) = 4559.3mm
(l/d)> (l/d) basic * α*β*γ
d>=4457.7/ (23*1.5)
d>=129.208mm=130mm
providing cover=30mm
Total depth (D) =160mm

Design of column
Using IS875 part I,
Unit weight of RCC (γc) = 25 KN/m3
Unit weight of wall (γw) = 20 KN/m3
Floor finish = 23KN/m3
Ceiling Plaster= 20.4 KN/m3
Live load = 5KN/m2

Influence Area for F-4 column=24.75*((28.667/2) + (20/2))

=602.25ft2
=55.76 m2

Calculations of loads for influence area of column F-4

Main Beam load= (24’9”+(28’8”/2)+(20’/2))*0.48*0.39*25
=69.987 KN
Secondary beam load=14.725*0.335*0.27*25
=33.77KN

Load due to slab (self-weight)= 25*55.76*0.16 = 223.04KN

Live Load = 5*55.76 = 278.8KN
Floor Finish = 23*55.76*0.02*23 = 25.65KN
Ceiling plaster = 20.4*55.76*0.0125 = 14.219KN
Wall load=19*(24’9”+(28’8”/2)+(20’/2))*0.23*(13’*3.302-0.48)
=227.28 KN
Total load on column F-4 for single storey= 872.656KN
Total design load for single storey= 1.5*total load
=1308.98KN
Total design load for all storey=1308.98*6 = 7853.904 KN

According to IS 456 Cl. 39.3,

Pu=0.4*fck*Ac+0.67 fy*Asc
Assuming axially loaded column,
Steel=3%
fck=20 N/mm2
fy= 415N/mm2
Ac=(1-0.03)Ag
=0.97Ag
Asc=0.03Ag
Now we get,
Pu=0.4*fck*Ac+0.67 fy*Asc
7853.904=0.4*20*0.97Ag0+0.67*415*0.03Ag
12261.168=16.1015Ag
Ag=487.77*103mm2
Since column provided is of square shape,
Size of column=698.41mm*698.41m

Calculation of base shear (vb):

Vb= Ah * Ws
As per 18 1893 (Part 1): Cl.6.4. 2
𝑍∗ 𝐼∗𝑆𝑎
Ah =
2∗𝑅∗𝑔
Ah=design horizontal acceleration spectrum value
Z=zone factor for maximum consider earthquake condition given in IS l893 (Part l) 2000 (clause
6.4.2, table 2)
R=response reduction factor given in IS 1893(Part I) :2000 clause 6.4.2, table 7
Sa/g=spectral acceleration depending upon the period of vibration and damping as given in IS
1893(Part l):2000 clause 6.4.2,fig 2.
I =post disaster importance factor depending on the life and function of the structure, historical
value or economic importance as IS 1893(Part l):2000 clause 6.4.2, table 6

Ws=seismic weight which include

Floor wise dead load consisting of weight of floor, beam, parapet, fix permanent equipment and
half the wall and column etc above and below.
b. Reduce live load on the building (75% of live load for LL <=3.0 KN/m2 and 50% of live load
for LL> 3KN/m2'
T=estimated natural or fundamental period of vibration of the building in second
T= 0.075 x h0.75 (for moment resisting building)
T=0.09*h/√𝐷 (for braced concrete building)
Where, h=total height of the building in m in the direction perpendicular to the applied load.
D=dimension of the building in m in a direction parallel to the applied earthquake force.
After calculating the base shear V1, the distribution of earthquake force on different floor is
determined as follows:
Qi= vb * wihi2 /∑wi.hi 2 where Q. =horizontal force actin at an floor i. g Y
wi=weight of ith storey assumed to be lumped at i " floor
hi =height of ith floor above base of frame.
 Lump mass calculation
Slab
Floor Main beam Secondary beam Column Shear wall and lift Staircase Total load
LIVE LOAD DEAD LOAD
basement
ground floor 1863.47 533.814 2894 11237.585 13485.102 2731.6585 180.26795 32925.89745
first floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 8730.6 10476.72 1086.3832 223.046 25273.1212
second floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 8826.16 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 25483.3532
third floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 8826.16 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 25483.3532
fourth floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 8826.16 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 25483.3532
fifth floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 8826.16 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 25483.3532
roof 1534.12 421.902 1400.175 5626.704 11253.408 0 111.523 20347.832
180480.2635
 Seismic weight calculation
Slab
Floor Main beam Secondary beam Column Shear wall and Lift Total load(KN)
Live load (0.5LL) Dead load (DL)
basement
ground floor 1863.47 533.814 2894 5618.7925 13485.102 2731.6585 180.26795 27126.837
first floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 4365.3 10476.72 1086.3832 223.046 20684.7752
second floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 4413.08 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 20847.2272
third floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 4413.08 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 20847.2272
fourth floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 4413.08 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 20847.2272
fifth floor 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 4413.08 10591.392 1086.3832 223.046 20847.2272
roof 1534.12 421.902 2800.35 11253.408 543.1916 111.523 16552.9716
Total Seismic Weight = 147753.4926
 BASE SHEAR CALCULATION

SN Parameters Values Remarks

1 Time Period,Ta 1.2117 Cl.7.6.1 IS1893
Table 2 ,IS1893 (Part 1:2002)
2 Zone Factor,Z 0.36 Zone 5
3 Importance factor,I 1.5 Table 6,IS1893 (Part 1:2002)
Table 7 (Special RC Moment
4 Response Reduction Factor,R 5 Resisting Frame)
(fig 2, IS 1893) For medium
5 Average response acceleration coefficient 1.275 soil
6 Design Horizontal seismic coefficient,(Ah) 0.060609 Cl.6.4.2 IS1893
7 Base shear (Vb ) 3318.498 KN

Lateral load and base shear distribution on each floor

FLOOR Wi Hi WiHi^2 Fi
Basement
Ground floor 27126.84 0.00 0.00 0.00
1st floor 20684.78 3.96 324698.10 196.46
2nd floor 20847.23 7.92 1308992.73 792.01
3rd floor 20847.23 11.89 2945233.63 1782.02
4th floor 20847.23 15.85 5235970.90 3168.04
5th floor 20847.23 19.81 8181204.54 4950.06
Roof 16552.97 23.77 9354216.41 5659.80

27350316.31