Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2010
Page 1 of 2
• A statement of comparison in which the student
explains If the statement of 'which' is more
◦ which of the PQ, SQ1, and SQ2 is more difficult is missing ==> reduce
difficult and
◦ why it is more difficult.
marks. ( E5 )
Note: the creation of the 3 MCQs in conjunction with If the statement of 'why' it is more
the statement of comparison, promotes difficult is missing ==> reduce
• critical thinking marks. ( E6 )
• critical writing.
Relevance An argument as to Read the argument (the why and the
• why the MCQ is relevant to the course material what).
associated with the designated 10-day period.
For example: “the question is relevant to CH.4,
If the argument for 'why' is missing,
section 4.1, because ....” . Or, “this question is
especially referring to material in page 12 ==> reduce marks. ( E7 )
lower half, where it says “....<quote from page
12> ...” and page 17 3rd paragraph (where it says If the argument for 'what' is
“... <quote from page page 17> ...”. Part of the missing, ==> reduce marks. ( E8 )
'why' should definitely (but not necessarily only)
be which chapter of the book, or which talk the
MCQ is from.
• what the MCQ tests. For example: this question
tests knowledge of whether the student:
◦ knows rule R17 of the ACM code of ethics.
◦ Can distinguish between rules R17, R18,
and R24 of the IEEE code of ethics.
Note: the creation of the 3 MCQs in conjunction with If statement is missing ==>
the statement of substantiation, promotes reduce marks. ( E10 )
• critical thinking
• critical writing.
t_understand_anything_until_you_learn_it/215044.html
3“You don't understand anything until you learn it more than one way.” Marvin Minsky quotes (American Electrical
engineer, Mathematician and Educator, b.1927) http://thinkexist.com/quotation/you_don-
t_understand_anything_until_you_learn_it/215044.html
Page 2 of 2