Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophy of Assessment
Assignment 6
Sam Costello
Author’s Note
This paper was prepared for Classroom Assessment Principles and Practices ED 312,
Introduction
My assessment philosophy has changed since being exposed to ED 311 and ED 312 classes
that pertained to Classroom Assessment Principles and Practices. ED 311 class was a more
hands-on creating a summative assessment in the “backwards design” to focus the unit
plan around the summative assessment for a heterogeneous mixture of social studies
students, and ED 312 was actually seeing real classroom documents that allowed us to
unpack formative assessments to the needs of students. I actually thought teachers taught
the material then made the test in accordance to what was taught. This can be a daunting
task and biased approach because has all the material been taught and understood by the
students before I give a test? With focusing my energies on the material needed to explain
the questions developed first that students will see on the test is a more intuitive approach,
and interpreting if students understand and comprehend the material is through formative
assessments. I believe that formative assessments are vital for gauging learning in students
that we as educators should striving for, as we cultivate and stimulate the cognitive growth
process in our students before the summative assessment is given. Formative assessments
meaning into material that is easier to absorb, easier to engage in, and easier to have fun
while learning.
3
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
effectively to students. Assessments are gauges or litmus test to see if the students have
students to educators to see how students are learning the material, and it allows
educators to adjust teaching and delivery of that material if needed. Formative assessments
may need extra assistance or scaffolding to reach the same outcome as other students.
Formative assessments can help students with mastery of the content. Formative
assessments are more important by helping to eliminate biases in the classroom because
“our students come to us ‘biased’ on how [they] see the world,” (Wormeli, 2006, p.20) and
it is our job to break down those barriers. However, the cycle of assessment or the use of
different styles of assessing has to be changed up to not use the same assessments as to
create boredom and disengagement from students. There are a plethora of formative
assessments for educators to use to keep students engaged in learning. Unfortunately, I did
not see this in my recent classroom observations as the seventh grade social studies
classroom always had the same “exit ticket” to gauge comprehension of the material. I
watched students just push or plow through this monotonous assessment and write down
nonsense, but I also read some that had profound analysis of the topic. I believe we as
4
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
educators need to constantly reflect on the validity of our forms of assessment to make
different levels and something students need extra scaffolding to help push that student
into the “zone of proximal development” that helps create elaborative understanding and
cognitive growth. Disequilibrium can scare us all into an unpleasant state and create
anxiety in learning, but it can also be “a way to compel students to push themselves ... some
students need the occasional extra opportunity” (Wormeli, 2006, p. 126) to achieve the
same output level as others, and this is were equity comes into sharp focus. The output is a
new equilibrium that creates cognitive growth and further engagement. For formative
assessments to be effective the learning cycle, we as educators have to ask those questions
to see what background knowledge our students may have of a particular subject, we have
to ask questions of verification or spot check students working to see if connections are
being made, and we have to ask those exit questions for mastery. Another way to assess is
for students to critique the material if it was engaging and fun – this can be a hard one for
educators to release to students, but I believe vital to make the lesson material engaging
challenging process to unpack those essential standards, and is essential. The summative
assessment should be designed “first, and make sure everything in the unit’s objectives or
5
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
understandings are accounted for … and doesn’t assess anything beyond the unit’s goal”
(Wormeli, 2006, p. 27). This statement by Wormeli is so true as we can possible relate to
taking a test and seeing information on that did not relate to what was taught. This can
create anxiety and “inconsistency with punishable ... letter grades” (Wormeli, 2006, p.
114-115). This is not fair and should not be practiced by the educator…only test what is
being taught should be the mantra of education. Formative assessments are the litmus
I believe that the most challenging aspect of creating a summative assessment deals
with bias in assessing students. Students come from different walks of life that have
different traditions that can be diverse from our own ideologies. Making a summative
assessment and administering it as a test run to colleagues could help with uncovering bias,
found after five tests that my terminology was not at the same level as my students.
ineffective delivery, or just the need to ask if anyone knows what this means could be very
helpful. Sometimes even Pedagogy Content Knowledge will be as effective in putting the
terminology in the student vernacular, or context to their thinking (i.e. relating to students
how malaria has no cure once contracted, like zombies have no cure once the disease is
contracted). Formative assessments should be used to find if there is bias and overcome
Finally, I believe assessing diverse needs and diverse learners is very important, but
will possibly be the hardest of them all, as to find ways to reach all students’ needs. This
6
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
maybe apparent with IEPs and our deliver of instructions are already mapped out for us,
but what if we have a struggling student(s)? Good formative assessments can help guide
the educator into what is appropriate and engaging for all students. Formative assessments
are the key to developing harmony in a classroom that creates a positive environment and
helps all children to perform at their level and above. Formative assessments can help us
find that happy medium to excite all students into learning and make classrooms fun and
engaging environments.
Course Syllabus
Grading Policy:
➢ Major assignments will receive a letter grade of an A-F for the work turned in. End
of unit test will receive a letter grade also to provide a standard for mastery of the
material. Grades are not final due to some circumstances that may require
adjustments, but that is case-by-case basis. The teacher has the final say on grades
administered in the grade book, but all side will be looked at to determine if there is
a need to make needed adjustments for the benefit of the student due to unforeseen
circumstances.
➢ Late assignment will be subject to a 5% reduction in letter grade per day the
Missed Assignments:
turned in on time when the teacher sets the due date(s). If for some reason a
7
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
situation comes about that conflict with the due date, students can use a voucher. If
vouchers are used up, it is the responsibility of the student to inform the teacher, so
an alternate date can be considered. A student needs to inform the teacher 2 days in
advance of conflict. The teacher has the final say in matters of missed assignments.
➢ Issues with next day homework can be accompanied by note from parents
describing situation to validate a late turn in, and teacher and student can arrange
an alternate day.
➢ These 2 standards are import not to just make busy work for students, but to help
them understand and comprehend information. It also helps the teacher to see
issues in learning that may need additional attention or adjustment in the lesson(s).
Participation helps to reveal the need to go over material again as students may
knowledge or further helping them master the material. Grades for both will
Voucher System
➢ Each student will be given 4 vouchers (one per semester) that can be used for any
late turn in assignment, no questions asked, and the letter grade will not be lowered.
Once these vouchers are gone, then the student is subject to Late Assignment Policy.
8
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
Grading Scale:
A+ 98-100 4.33
A 90-97 4.00
B+ 88-89 3.33
B 80-87 3.00
C+ 78-79 2.33
C 70-77 2.00
D+ 68-69 1.33
D 60-67 1.00
F 59 0.00
Conclusion
the content engaging, relevant, and meaningful to their lives. I will use formative
assessments as tools to help my students to be successful and zero in on issues that may
need addressing before an end of unit test is given. I will be reflective about my practice
and include summative assessments that are authentic and structured that demonstrates
students to have fun learning about social studies and always add to the conversation
because their opinions are as important as mine. This style of mutual respect and my
9
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
the education field of middle grades education and 21st Century Education practices.
10
Assignment 6: Philosophy of Assessment
References
North Carolina State University. (n.d.). Undergraduate Catalog. 2017-2018 Grading Scale and
http://catalog.ncsu.edu/undergraduate/academicpoliciesandprocedures/courses/grading/
Wormeli, R. (2006). Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessing & Grading in the Differentiated