Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEMORANDUM
Enclosed is the agenda for the Second Draft meeting for NFPA 20, Standard on the Installation of
Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection, which will be held at the UL LLC office in Northbrook, IL
8:00am to 5:00pm CDT on Tuesday October 21, 2014, and 8:00am to 5:00pm on Wednesday
October 22, 2014.
Please submit requests for additional agenda items to the chair at least seven days prior to the
meeting, and notify the chair and staff liaison as soon as possible if you plan to introduce any
Second revisions at the meeting.
All NFPA Technical Committee meetings are open to the public. Please contact me for
information on attending a meeting as a guest. Read NFPA's Regulations Governing the
Development of NFPA Standards (Section 3.3.3.3) for further information.
C. Standards Administration
Page 1 of 5
Technical Committee on Fire Pumps (FIM-AAA)
NFPA 20 Second Draft Meeting (Annual 2015)
Tuesday, Oct.21, 2014 and Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014, 8:00am – 5:00pm CDT
UL LLC, 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL
AGENDA
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
9. Adjourn - TBD
Page 2 of 5
Technical Committee on Fire Pumps (FIM-AAA)
NFPA 20 Second Draft Meeting (Annual 2015)
Tuesday, Oct.21, 2014 and Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014, 8:00am – 5:00pm CDT
UL LLC, 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL
Please notify the chair and staff liaison as soon as possible if you plan to introduce any
committee input at the meeting.
Page 3 of 5
Technical Committee on Fire Pumps (FIM-AAA)
NFPA 20 Second Draft Meeting (Annual 2015)
Tuesday, Oct.21, 2014 and Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014, 8:00am – 5:00pm CDT
UL LLC, 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL
Meeting Preparation
Committee members are strongly encouraged to review the published comments prior to the
meeting and to be prepared to act on each item.
Handout materials should be submitted to the chair at least seven days prior to the meeting.
Only one posting of the comments will be made; it will be arranged in section/order and will be
pre-numbered. This will be posted to the NFPA Document information pages located at
www.nfpa.org/20. If you have trouble accessing the website please contact Elena Carroll at
ecarroll@nfpa.org.
Mandatory Materials:
Last edition of the standard
Meeting agenda
Public input/comments
Committee Officers' Guide (Chairs)
Roberts’ Rules of Order (Chairs; An abbreviated version may be found in the
Committee Officer’s Guide)
Optional Materials:
NFPA Annual Directory
NFPA Manual of Style
Prepared committee input/comments (If applicable)
All actions during and following the committee meetings will be governed in accordance with the
Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. Failure to comply with these
regulations could result in challenges to the standards-making process. A successful challenge on
procedural grounds could prevent or delay publication of the document.
The style of the document must comply with the Manual of Style for NFPA Technical Committee
Documents.
Page 4 of 5
Technical Committee on Fire Pumps (FIM-AAA)
NFPA 20 Second Draft Meeting (Annual 2015)
Tuesday, Oct.21, 2014 and Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014, 8:00am – 5:00pm CDT
UL LLC, 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL
Page 5 of 5
NEW PROCESS ACTIONS AND MOTIONS
Possible Action #1: Accept Public Comment (exactly as it is)
Action Required Sample motion
I move to create a Second Revision using PC #
Create a Second Revision
______.
Possible action #2: Reject but see (revise submitted text)
Action Required Sample motion
I move to create a Second Revision based on PC
Create a Second Revision based on a
Step 1 # _____with the following changes to the text . .
Public Comment
.
If the revision is related to multiple PCs, I move to create a Second Revision based on PC
Step 2 respond to all of them together using the # ____and incorporating PC #s _____with the
cart function following changes to the text . . .
Possible action #3: Reject (no change to the standard)
Action Required Sample motion
I move to reject PC # ____ with the following
Generate a statement (substantiation)
substantiation . . .
Possible Action #4: Reject but hold (new material)
Action Required Sample motion
I move to reject PC # ____ but hold it for
Reject Public Comment for this cycle, but
consideration during the First Draft meeting next
save for next revision cycle
cycle.
Attachment #1:
Previous Meeting Minutes
MINUTES of the
6. Staff Liaison Chad Duffy addressed the revised Standard Development Process.
8. Staff Liaison Chad Duffy instructed Technical Committee on Roster update and attendance log.
9. Chairman Pennel called for a motion to accept minutes of October 2011 ROC meeting of the
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE in San Antonio, TX. Motion passed unanimously.
11. Technical Committee began the review and action process on 159 public input proposals
beginning with Task Group reports and actions:
13. Technical Committee reconvened at 8:00 AM on 10/2 and continued the review and action
process on the Public Input proposals beginning with unfinished Task Group reports and
actions:,
14. Chairman Pennel entertained a discussion by Victoria Valentine (NFPA 13) regarding Hanging
and Bracing.
15. Technical Committee continued with the review and action process on remaining Public Input
proposals
Thursday; October 3
17. Technical Committee reconvened at 8:00 AM on 10/3 and continued the review and action
process on the remaining Public Input proposals
18. Chairman Pennel announced a ballot for this NFPA 20 meeting on Public Input would be
forwarded to the Technical Committee members for their official vote.
19. Chairman Pennel announced that the next meeting will likely be scheduled in August,
September, or October 2014. Exact date and location to be announced in the future.
20. Chairman Pennel called for a motion to adjourn at 12:15 PM. Motion passed unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
R. T. Leicht, Secretary
Attendees:
Principals
Alternates
Michael Aaron
Timothy Ballengee Kerry Bell
James Beals Brad Cronin
Marinus Both Jerald Huff
Pat Brock Kenneth Isman
Hugh Castles Floyd Luinstra
Stephen Clark William Stelter
Mohammad Dadgardoust Thomas Wellen
Alan Dorini
David Fuller Guests
Dana Haagensen
David hague Peter Schwab
Bill Harvey Brian Buscler
Hatem Kheir Kevin Kunkler
John Kovacik Tim Jordan
Jennifer McGrath Les Andree
Charles McKnight Rogen Montenbeault
James Nasby Steven Baird
Jeffrey Roberts Matt Paine
Michael Rothmier Doug Stephens
Richard Schneider Victoria Valentine
Darrell Snyder
Terry Victor
John Whitney
Attachment #2:
Public Comment/20
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
This puts the section back to the language in the previous edition. The revision was taken from NFPA 72 and uses
terms that are not common in the fire pump industry. Traditionally, "as built" drawings are prepared by the
sprinkler contractor and do not include wiring diagrams or wiring sequences. These might be provided by the
electrician or the controller manufacturer, but they are separate from the as built drawings that would show the
water-filled pipe provided by the sprinkler contractor.
Related Item
First Revision No. 3-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 3.3.41]
1 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4.3.1
In the event of fire pump operation that is not a part of a scheduled weekly or monthly churn test , qualified
personnel shall respond to the fire pump location to determine that the fire pump is operating in a
satisfactory manner.
First Revisions 58 and 59 permit an automatic timer to shut off the fire pump. This implies that the committee
intends to allow fire pumps to run unattended during the weekly or monthly churn test. While we are not
particularly in favor of that idea, we note that such unattended running of the pump would violate this section, so it
needs to be modified. We don't know how the committee intends for the data collected during the test to be
recorded without a person present in the pump room, but assuming that a building owner could figure out how to
record this data remotely, it is possible that the pump room could be unattended.
Related Item
First Revision No. 58-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 10.5.2.6.3]
First Revision No. 59-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 10.5.4.2]
2 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
The minimum enclosure required by NFPA 20, paragraph 12.3.3.1.1 is a NEMA type 2. This is not suitable for
sprinkler spray. It is only suitable for dripping water from the vertical. Spray from a sprinkler head can directly
enter a type 2 enclosure and potentially damage or destroy the controller.
Related Item
First Revision No. 12-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.12.1.3]
3 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
The minimum enclosure required by NFPA 20, paragraph 10.3.3.1 is a NEMA type 2. This is not suitable for
sprinkler spray. It is only suitable for dripping water from the vertical. Spray from a sprinkler head can directly
enter a type 2 enclosure and potentially damage or destroy the controller.
Related Item
First Revision No. 12-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.12.1.3]
4 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Delete this new clause. No reason has been given to deviate from Table 4.12.1.1.2. No new evidence has been
given to indicate that an electric fire pump is more of a fire hazard than previously. Further, spraying fire water on
electical equipment (motor and controller) is not good practice. This especially since the controller is protected
only from vertical dripping water, wheras fire water from sprinklers is not only vertical.
Related Item
First Revision No. 12-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.12.1.3]
5 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Public Comment No. 51-NFPA 20-2014 [ Section No. 4.13.2.1.1 [Excluding any
Sub-Sections] ]
Except as provided in 4.13.2.1.1.1, fire pump rooms not directly accessible from the outside shall be
accessible through an enclosed passageway from an enclosed stairway or exterior exit, provided neither of
which are part of a required means of egress .
NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC) agrees that a passageway from the exterior to a fire
pump room is acceptable. We think it should not interfere with a required means of egress. This Public Comment
is related to Public Input #134 but revises the text from Public Input #134. This allows the existing access from a
room that is normally unoccupied, and therefore not needing a means of egress.
This change does not affect the FR30 for a local application.
Related Item
Public Input No. 134-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.12.2.1.1]
6 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 20-2014 [ Section No. 4.19.7.2 [Excluding any
Sub-Sections] ]
Where pump discharge water is piped back to pump suction and the pump is driven by a diesel engine with
heat exchanger cooling, the controller shall provide a visual indicator and audible alarm and stop the engine
when a high cooling water temperature signal as required by 11.2.4.4.8 is received, provided there are no
active emergency requirements for the pump to run. This includes; fire water demand, remote switch
actuation and deluge valve or fire detection signal to run.
As written, the test in not very enforceable, if at all, since no definition is given for "active emergency requirements
for the pump to run". This is too esoteric as well as too vague.
Related Item
First Revision No. 75-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.18.7.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]
7 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4.20.2.9.2
Series fire pump controller(s) shall be provided with the extra contacts for remote indication in accordance
with 4.20.2.9.1.1 or 4.20.2.9.1.2.
4.20.2.9.2.1
Where other means are used to communicate this information, the extra contacts in 4.20.2.9.2 are not
required.
To provide all the information and signals required in 4.20.2.2 and 4.20.2.9 a network connection will most likely be
supplied between controllers. This comment will allow signals by extra contacts and by other means such as a
network connection.
Related Item
First Revision No. 35-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.19.2]
8 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4.28.4.6
Retroactive installation of a backflow prevention device shall not reduce the suction pressure below that
permitted in this standard and accepted by the authority having jurisdiction. This shall not apply to
backflow prevention devices retroactively installed prior to the adoption of the adoption of this edition of this
standard.
It is not clear that extant installations need not comply with this new requirement since the term "retroactive
installation" is used.
Related Item
First Revision No. 36-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 4.27.4.5]
9 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4.28.4.6
Retroactive installation of a backflow prevention device shall not reduce the suction pressure below that
permitted in this standard and accepted by the authority having jurisdiction. This shall not apply to
backflow prevention devices retroactively installed prior to the adoption of the adoption of this edition of this
standard.
It is not clear that extant installations need not comply with this new requirement since the term "retroactive
installation" is used.
Related Item
First Revision No. 36-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 4.27.4.5]
10 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
4.30.1
A packaged fire pump assembly, with or without an enclosure, shall meet all of the following requirements:
(1) The components shall be assembled and affixed onto a steel framing structure.
(2) Welders shall be qualified in accordance with the Section 9 of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
or with the American Welding Society AWS D1.1, Structural Welding Code — Steel.
(1) The
assembly shall be listed for fire pump service.
(2) The total assembly shall be engineered and designed by a system designer as referenced in 4.3.2.
(3) All plans and data sheets shall be submitted and reviewed by the authority having jurisdiction, with
copies of the stamped approved submittals used in the assembly and for record keeping.
The Committee Statement did not provide a satisfactory explanation as to why a prepackaged fire pump assembly
would need to be listed. It only made some vague reference to problems with some pump packages. It did not
offer any details as to what these problems may be, so they cannot be addressed at this phase. Concerning
problems with prepackaged fire pump assemblies however, it is hard to image how they could be
more severe than those associated with fire pump systems that are taken to the job site in component pieces and
assembled there in the field.
Additionally, the Committee Statement did not offer any comment on the Substantiation (copied below for
reference) that was provided with the Public Input. It did not speak to the points about the current requirement:
- Limiting who can build prepackaged assemblies;
- Limiting the ability to provide customized skids to meet a client’s specific needs;
- That there should be no differences in the acceptability of prepackaged assemblies vs. systems assembled on
the job sites; and
- The fallacy of the previous cycle Proposals, 20-16 & 20-17 attributing unit responsibility to the fire pump
manufacturer.
11 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Related Item
Committee Input No. 24-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 4.29.1]
12 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
A diesel engine back-up fire pump should be permitted as an alternative to a generator. Chapter 9 already allows
this and Chapter 5 should not over-ride Chapter 9.
Related Item
First Revision No. 44-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 5.5]
First Revision No. 137-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 9.3.1]
13 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
5.6.1.4
Each refill valve shall be sized and arranged to independently refill the tank in a maximum time of 8
hours. supply the system fiure protection demand. I.E.: Revert to original wording.
This section applies to "Very Tall Buildings" where the building height exceeds the pumping capacity of the fire
department apparatus. While I agree that in certain circumstances the refill rate being equal to the fire protection
demand can be difficult to achieve, the proposed change to an 8 hour refill time is not sufficent to ensure a
reasonable refill rate to maintain building fire protection. In most cases the water supply duration requirement will
be 30 or 60 minutes total. Going from a 1:1 to a 1:16 or 1:8 refill ratio leaves the building without fire protection for
far too long in context of a very tall building where evacuation times are lenghthy and/or protect in place stratgies
are used and there is sole reliance on the building fire protection water supply.
The original requirements were written to permit up to 1/2 of the total stored demand to be out of service with the
understanding that refill rate would compensate for the storage out of service. Where the refill comes from a
standpipe below this can be accomplished at minimal cost (larger refill pipe and valve from the top of a standpipe
to a tank). For a ground level tank the municipal supply must make up the refill. The originally required refill rate is
a minimal cost item that should apply to all high rise building where evacuation is impractical.
Related Item
First Revision No. 60-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 5.6.1.4]
14 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
5.6.1.4
Each refill valve shall be sized and arranged to independently refill the tank in a maximum time of 8 of 4
hours.
NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC) agrees with the intent of this First Revision. This Public
Comment would require each refill valve shall be sized and arranged to independently refill the tank in a maximum
time of 4-hours, rather than 8 hours. The current code requires that the storage tank refill at a very quick rate.
The proposed language in FR #60 allows for a maximum of 8 hours to refill the tank, which appears to be an
excessive amount of time without full capabilities of water supply. Fire flow requirements set forth in NFPA 1
section 18.4.5.1.2 have a maximum duration for the largest buildings at four hours. A four-hour time period would
allow the system to be up to full capabilities much faster without the extreme draw that is currently allowed.
Related Item
First Revision No. 60-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 5.6.1.4]
15 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
9.6.5.3
The fire pump circuit breaker shall not be required to be coordinated with the generator power source
protective device provided it is used as a an individual branch circuit breaker and is coordinated with all
other line side protective devices, where used .
NFPA 70 has several definitions for a branch circuit. The "Branch Circuit, Individual" definition is most appropriate
for this use. Also, "where used" was added since other line side protective devices are not always used.
Related Item
First Revision No. 49-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 9.6.5]
16 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.3.4.5.3
Except as provided in 4.20.2. 3 2(1) and 10.9.4 , remote shutdown or interlock to prevent normal operation
shall not be permitted unless approved by the authority having jurisdiction.
Paragraph reference corrected and added the reference to10.9.4 which specifically allows shutdown under
specified conditions.
Related Item
First Revision No. 52-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 10.3.4.5.2]
17 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.5.2.1.1.2
For multistage multiport pumps, a separate pressure-actuated switch or electronic pressure sensor as
described in 10.5.2.1.1.1 shall be provided for each discharge port of the pump as part of the controller.
10.5.2.1.1.3
There For multistage multiport pumps, a separate pressure recorder as described in 10.5.2.1.7.2 shall be
provided for each discharge port of the pump as part of the controller.
This will add a requirement to monitor the pressure in each zone as is the case with individual pumps in each zone.
Related Item
First Revision No. 126-NFPA 20-2013 [Sections 10.5.2.1.1.1, 10.5.2.1.1.2]
18 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.5.2.1.3.1 *
Where the transducer pressure reading exceeds 10 psi (0.68 bar) during any automatic pump start that
was initiated by the solenoid drain valve, as required by 10.5.2.1.8.3 , the controller shall activate a visual
and audible alarm, that can be silenced.
The clause is overly restrictive by requiring pressure to be limited to a maximum of 10psi (No technical data has
been presented to support this level) when the solenoid drain valve is opened. The intent of the clause is already
addressed by clause 10.5.2.7.5 (Automatic testing section) which requires the transducer output pressure reading
to fall below the system low pressure start point, and initiate an automatic start, or an alarm is activated.
Related Item
First Revision No. 53-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 10.5.2.1.2]
19 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.5.2.7.1
Where permitted by the AHJ, The controller equipment shall be arranged to automatically start, run, and
shut down the motor at the minimum no-flow test frequency and duration required by NFPA 25.
The proposed wording circumvents of the AHJ’s authority by allowing an automatic start then shutdown in the first
circumstance even when the AHJ has decided that it must be manual. There are compelling reasons for an AHJ to
require manual shutdown under all circumstances and it is the AHJ prerogative to enforce the arrangement that he
deems appropriate. The Standard should not be dictating the AHJ as how fire pumps are to be arranged in his
jurisdiction. The AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation. NFPA 25 requires a person to be in
attendance when a fire pump is running.
20 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
No good reason has been given for eliminating automatic stopping for pumps which are not sole source pumps.
This will cause any number of pumps to burn up, which is why Chicago requires automatic stopping of ALL electric
fire pumps. While I feel that sole source pumps should require manual stopping, this seems excessive where
multiple pumps are involved. The net result will be to REDUCE the reliability of fire protection on many of these
cases rather than either maintaining or enhancing said reliability.
Related Item
First Revision No. 59-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 10.5.4.2]
21 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.5.4.2.1
Automatic shutdown shall be permitted only in the following circumstances:
(1) During automatic testing in accordance with 10.5.2.7 when permitted by the AHJ
(2) Where approved by the authority having jurisdiction for non-testing conditions
The proposed wording circumvents of the AHJ’s authority by allowing an automatic start then shutdown in the first
circumstance even when the AHJ has decided that it must be manual. There are compelling reasons for an AHJ to
require manual shutdown under all circumstances and it is the AHJ prerogative to enforce the arrangement that he
deems appropriate. The Standard should not be dictating the AHJ as how fire pumps are to be arranged in his
jurisdiction. The AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation. NFPA 25 requires a person to be in
attendance when a fire pump is running.
22 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
No good reason has been given for eliminating automatic stopping for pumps which are not sole source pumps.
This will cause any number of pumps to burn up, which is why Chicago requires automatic stopping of ALL electric
fire pumps. While I feel that sole source pumps should require manual stopping, this seems excessive where
multiple pumps are involved. The net result will be to REDUCE the reliability of fire protection on many of these
cases rather than either maintaining or enhancing said reliability.
Related Item
First Revision No. 59-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 10.5.4.2]
23 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
The delayed transition transfer switch eliminates the higher than normal in-rush currents when transferring the fire
pump motor from one source to the other. This is a transfer switch listed for emergency systems (NFPA 70 Article
700).
24 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Extent text does not require nor name a single entity or who is to be responsible for Arrangement II power transfer
equipment, although the fire pump controller is covered. Extent text allows a potpourri of various components to
be mounted and installed which may or may not be coordinated, safe or reliable. The power transfer equipment
should be by a single entity, and listed as such, as is the fire pump controller and as the combination unit is in
Arrangement I in 10.8.2.1.
Related Item
Public Input No. 101-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 11.4.4.2]
25 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
10.8.3.10.1
The use of an “in-phase monitor” or an intentional delay via an open neutral position of the transfer switch
to comply with the requirements of 10.8.3.10 shall be prohibited.
A delayed transition transfer switch eliminates the need for an interface between the transfer switch and fire pump
controller. Also, UL 1008-7, paragraph E2.16 only restricts the use of the "In-phase monitor".
Related Item
First Revision No. 101-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 10.8.2.2]
26 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
The requirements of 10.5.2.6 are moot if the combination controller or if the Arrangement II transfer switch unit
looses control of the stand-by generator due to an open circuit in a normally open circuit control loop, or a short
circuit in a normally closed loop or a ground which may also inhibit the generator from starting, depending on
where it occurs.
Related Item
Public Input No. 101-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 11.4.4.2]
27 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
11.2.4.3.4.1.1 *
Pressure sensing line(s) shall be installed with a connection to the pipe that is in horizontal orientation to
the pressure source Delete this proposed new clause or move it to the Annex A .
It's not clear what "horizontal orientation to the pressure source" means. I don't know what the proposed piping
will look like. No reason has been given to force this arrangement on all variable speed engine and engine
manufacturers.
Related Item
First Revision No. 72-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 11.2.4.3.4.1]
28 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
11.2.4.3.4.1.1 *
Pressure sensing line(s) shall be installed with a connection to the pipe that is in horizontal orientation to
the pressure source.
The term "horizontal orientation to the pressure source" is difficult to understand and enforce. A vertical sensing
line would work from underneath with a drop leg to allow sediment to drop down and be cleaned out.
Related Item
First Revision No. 72-NFPA 20-2013 [New Section after 11.2.4.3.4.1]
29 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
11.4.1.6.4
Vents from interstitial spaces of double-wall tanks shall meet 11.4.1.6.2 and 11.4.1.6.3 and shall not be
manifolded together with a vent from the primary portion of the tank.
NFPA 20 needs to clarify that the rules for the vent from the main portion of the tank also apply to the vent from the
interstitial space. Also, the standard needs to clarify that the vents cannot be manifolded together. Manifolding
the tanks might allow pressure to build up in a portion of the tank rather than vent properly.
Related Item
First Revision No. 147-NFPA 20-2013 [Global Input]
First Revision No. 149-NFPA 20-2013 [Global Input]
30 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
12.7.2.1.1.2
For multistage multiport pumps a separate pressure-actuated switch or electronic pressure sensor as
described in 12.7.2.1.1.1 shall be provided for each discharge port of the pump as part of the controller.
12.7.2.1.1.3
For multistage multiport pumps, a separate pressure recorder as described in 12.4.4.1 shall be
provided for each discharge port of the pump as part of the controller.
This will add a requirement to monitor the pressure in each zone as is the case with individual pumps in each zone.
Related Item
First Revision No. 127-NFPA 20-2013 [Sections 12.7.2.1.1.1, 12.7.2.1.1.2]
31 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
12.7.2.7.1
The Where permitted by the AHJ, the controller equipment shall be arranged to automatically start, run,
and shut down the engine at the minimum no-flow test frequency and duration required by NFPA 25.
The proposed wording circumvents of the AHJ’s authority by allowing an automatic start then shutdown in the first
circumstance even when the AHJ has decided that it must be manual. There are compelling reasons for an AHJ to
require manual shutdown under all circumstances and it is the AHJ prerogative to enforce the arrangement that he
deems appropriate. The Standard should not be dictating the AHJ as how fire pumps are to be arranged in his
jurisdiction. The AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation. NFPA 25 requires a person to be in
attendance when a fire pump is running.
Related Item
First Revision No. 66-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 12.7.5.2]
32 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 20-2014 [ Section No. 12.7.5.2 [Excluding any
Sub-Sections] ]
Automatic shutdown shall not be permitted if starting and running causes are present.
Delete this clause and revert to extant text of 12.7.5.2
No good reason has been given for eliminating automatic stopping for pumps which are not sole source pumps.
Based on filet experience this will cause any number of pumps to burn up for no good reason. While sole source
pumps should require manual stopping, the proposed text is excessively restrictive where multiple pumps are
involved. The net result will be to REDUCE, rather than enhance, the reliability of fire protection on many of these
cases rather than either maintaining or enhancing said reliability.
Also, the proposed wording allows an automatic shutdown in one circumstance even when the AHJ may decide
that it must be manual. This is a direct circumvent of the AHJ’s authority as defined in 3.2.2. Indeed, there may be
compelling reasons for automatic shutdown during automatic testing and if the AHJ agrees, then so be it.
However, if the AHJ has other reasons to require it to be manually shutdown or if the reasoning to shut down
automatically is not compelling, the AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation
Related Item
First Revision No. 66-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 12.7.5.2]
33 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
(3) The controller shall remove power from the engine running devices, prevent further cranking,
energize the overspeed fire pump alarm, and lock out until manually reset.
(4) Resetting of the overspeed circuit shall be required at the engine and by resetting the controller
main switch to the off position.
(5) The controller shall not be capable of being reset until the engine overspeed shutdown device is
manually reset.
No good reason has been given for eliminating automatic stopping for pumps which are not sole source pumps.
Based on filet experience this will cause any number of pumps to burn up for no good reason. While sole source
pumps should require manual stopping, the proposed text is excessively restrictive where multiple pumps are
involved. The net result will be to REDUCE, rather than enhance, the reliability of fire protection on many of these
cases rather than either maintaining or enhancing said reliability.
Also, the proposed wording allows an automatic shutdown in one circumstance even when the AHJ may decide
that it must be manual. This is a direct circumvent of the AHJ’s authority as defined in 3.2.2. Indeed, there may be
compelling reasons for automatic shutdown during automatic testing and if the AHJ agrees, then so be it.
However, if the AHJ has other reasons to require it to be manually shutdown or if the reasoning to shut down
automatically is not compelling, the AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation
Related Item
First Revision No. 66-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 12.7.5.2]
34 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
(3) The controller shall remove power from the engine running devices, prevent further cranking,
energize the overspeed fire pump alarm, and lock out until manually reset.
(4) Resetting of the overspeed circuit shall be required at the engine and by resetting the controller
main switch to the off position.
(5) The controller shall not be capable of being reset until the engine overspeed shutdown device is
manually reset.
No good reason has been given for eliminating automatic stopping for pumps which are not sole source pumps.
Based on filet experience this will cause any number of pumps to burn up for no good reason. While sole source
pumps should require manual stopping, the proposed text is excessively restrictive where multiple pumps are
involved. The net result will be to REDUCE, rather than enhance, the reliability of fire protection on many of these
cases rather than either maintaining or enhancing said reliability.
Also, the proposed wording allows an automatic shutdown in one circumstance even when the AHJ may decide
that it must be manual. This is a direct circumvent of the AHJ’s authority as defined in 3.2.2. Indeed, there may be
compelling reasons for automatic shutdown during automatic testing and if the AHJ agrees, then so be it.
However, if the AHJ has other reasons to require it to be manually shutdown or if the reasoning to shut down
automatically is not compelling, the AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation
Related Item
First Revision No. 66-NFPA 20-2013 [Section No. 12.7.5.2]
35 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
12.7.5.2.1
Automatic shutdown shall be permitted only in the following circumstances:
(1) * During automatic testing in accordance with 12.7.2.7 , when permitted by the AHJ .
(2) When the engine overspeed shutdown device operates:
(a) The controller shall remove power from the engine running devices, prevent further cranking,
energize the overspeed fire pump alarm, and lock out until manually reset.
(b) Resetting of the overspeed circuit shall be required at the engine and by resetting the controller
main switch to the off position.
(c) The controller shall not be capable of being reset until the engine overspeed shutdown device is
manually reset.
The proposed wording circumvents of the AHJ’s authority by allowing an automatic start then shutdown in the first
circumstance even when the AHJ has decided that it must be manual. There are compelling reasons for an AHJ to
require manual shutdown under all circumstances and it is the AHJ prerogative to enforce the arrangement that he
deems appropriate. The Standard should not be dictating the AHJ as how fire pumps are to be arranged in his
jurisdiction. The AHJ is still the final word on accepting an installation. NFPA 25 requires a person to be in
attendance when a fire pump is running.
36 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...
A.11.2.4.3.4.1.1
The pressure sensing line could be installed in a vertical orientation in either the top or bottom of the pipe,
however, if it is installed at the bottom it has the opportunity to gather debris, and if it is installed at the top it
has the opportunity to receive air.
The section that this is tied to has been proposed for elimination. Even if the section stays, telling people that they
can install something vertically when the main body of the standard says that it must be horizontal is wrong.
37 of 37 6/4/2014 9:15 AM
Attachment #3:
Committee Roster
09/18/2014
Address List No Phone Chad Duffy
Fire Pumps FIM-AAA
1
09/18/2014
Address List No Phone Chad Duffy
Fire Pumps FIM-AAA
2
09/18/2014
Address List No Phone Chad Duffy
Fire Pumps FIM-AAA
3
09/18/2014
Address List No Phone Chad Duffy
Fire Pumps FIM-AAA
4
09/18/2014
Address List No Phone Chad Duffy
Fire Pumps FIM-AAA