Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lite Urbanism
Improvisational Approaches to Shrinking Cities
1 October 2009
How can shrinking cities maintain or re-create urbanity while losing density? In
the United States, cities that have experienced significant, on-going population loss
resort to large-scale demolition efforts to reduce inventories of vacant and derelict
buildings.1 Although demolition is the tool of choice for combating decline in
many shrinking cities, this strategy begs the question-what next? Following mass
demolitions, an abundance of vacant, unmanaged land becomes a dominant part of a
city’s physical fabric. This real estate surplus represents the central challenge and the
most potent opportunity for the creative regeneration of shrinking cities.
The phenomenon of shrinkage undermines fundamental notions of urbanity and
traditional perceptions of what cities should be. As such, efforts to regenerate
shrinking cities through radical changes in physical form are often met with fear and
resistance. However, in cities that have had experienced substantial losses, there are
tentative signs that a more adventurous attitude is beginning to take hold—one that
fosters a sense of experimentation and optimism. This attitude is captured in the
following passage by Rem Koolhaas:
The seeming failure of the urban offers an exceptional opportunity, a pretext
for Nietzschean frivolity. We have to imagine 1,001 other concepts of city; we
have to take insane risks; we have to dare to be utterly uncritical; we have to
swallow deeply and bestow forgiveness left and right. The certainty of failure
has to be our laughing gas/oxygen; modernization our most potent drug.
Since we are not responsible, we have to become irresponsible. In a landscape
of increasing expediency and impermanence, urbanism no longer is or has to
be the most solemn of our decisions; urbanism can lighten up, become a Gay
Science—Lite Urbanism.
What if we simply declare that there is no crisis—redefine our relationship
with the city not as its makers but as its mere subjects, as its supporters? More
than ever, the city is all we have. 2
This paper is an exploration of the evolving physical form of shrinking cities and a
discussion of an improvisational approach to planning and design in a context of
uncertainty.
The modern American city planning movement was born out of a desire to eliminate
uncertainty and establish control over frequently chaotic urban conditions. Inspired
by the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893 and the subsequent plan
for Chicago in 1909, city planners and public officials across the country began to
embrace a fixed and formal set of principles for managing development and shaping
urban environments. Daniel Burnham’s famous edict, that one should “Make no
little plans” underscored this point of view-that order, control, and autocracy are
key aspects of urbanity.3
Zainab Rahman
(Cleveland Plain Dealer 26 April 2009)
2 | LITE URBANISM
Informal systems emerge in absence of accessible resources. 5 Instead of criminalizing grassroots
entrepreneurs, public officials in shrinking cities can begin to foster and support their activities.
More flexible regulations can be developed that still maintain public safety and minimize
the risk of creating public nuisances while enabling micro-scale innovation and creativity to
flourish. With their abundance of low-cost properties and dispersed population densities,
shrinking cities provide ideal conditions for informal networks to flourish.
Transitional Landscapes
Informal networks and underlying natural systems can also play a role in the physical
reconfiguration of shrinking cities. In the transect theory espoused by the Congress for the
New Urbanism, well-designed cities demonstrate a gradual and measured transition from a
very dense and compact urban core to lower density urban, suburban, and eventually rural
development patterns.6 The urban transect model corresponds with the biological concept
of disturbance gradients in which human development patterns disturb or disrupt underlying
natural systems to varying degrees. Higher density development generally correlates with a
more pronounced disturbance of natural systems.
Given the scale of vacancy in many shrinking cities, unexpected juxtapositions in land use
have begun to occur and disturbance regimes are becoming uneven and unpredictable.7
Dense, urban neighborhoods may be perforated by unmanaged landscapes in close proximity
to areas of intense development. Two processes are at work simultaneously: the disturbance
of natural systems by on-going human development and the resurgence of natural systems as
some neighborhoods depopulate and become “undeveloped.”
extreme sports
forest orchard wetland community recreation
garden
industrial
conversion
urban agriculture energy generation playgound temporary use public riparian corridor green corridor pocket park
edge along railway
This is not to suggest that shrinking cities are, as sometimes stated, “returning to
wilderness.” It is inaccurate to assume that when people abandon a city, indigenous
natural systems automatically reassert themselves. While vegetation can become rapidly
established in places that have been vacated by human residents, the resulting landscape
typically consists of invasive exotic species rather than any semblance of the native, pre-
development conditions. Naturalization and urbanism are two processes, constantly in
motion, shaped by changing patterns in human settlements and the perennial cycle of
natural succession.
A biological metaphor is often used to explain the phenomenon under way in older
industrial cities…a city is like a living organism that grows and matures, then declines
and dies. This is an inaccurate metaphor. A city is not a biological organism; it is
more like a biological system. Decay in a biological system is not followed by death,
but rather by transformation. If we guide the processes of decline and development
carefully, deterioration can lead to re-growth in a new and more resilient form. Given
a long enough timeline, all cities grow and all cities decline because human settlements
are constantly in flux. As such, urban design in periods of shrinkage must move beyond
formal and static principles to allow for the development of a more fluid kind of city.
Functional landscapes and small-scale public intimacies that are attuned to the micro-
local needs of shrinking cities can provide a counterpoint to the grand urban gestures
which often emerge in periods of rapid growth.
An example of the improvised landscape approach in Cleveland is the Emerald Fibers
concept, an opportunistic and resource-driven response to native patterns of hydrology.8
Like many cities in the Great Lakes region, Cleveland has an abundance of vacant land
and of water. Vacancy is visible, but much of the city’s hydrology is hidden. Streams
and creeks were contained in culverts many years ago when the city’s rapid growth
required the erasure of indigenous waterways. But now, as vacancy increases within city
limits, Cleveland has an unprecedented opportunity to restore a more natural pattern
of hydrology by prohibiting development on vacated land that is on top of, or within
close range of, a buried culvert. From an ecosystems perspective, it was never advisable to
build on top of water. By avoiding new development on sites that coincide with buried
waterways, the city can begin assembling an extensive green network, one parcel at a time.
4 | LITE URBANISM
Culverted streams in Cleveland, Ohio
Parcel-based restoration of
hydrological systems
Temporary use
The temporary use of vacant sites is another improvisational technique for shrinking
cities. Temporary uses provide a way to experiment with non-traditional design
ideas, repair damaged or missing social networks, and foster future development
opportunities. Through the development of a rapid prototype, an approximation of a
future, permanent use is created and tested in a temporary public context.9 The rapid
prototype model provides a new means of public engagement for shrinking cities.
Instead of asking the public to respond to sketches and models of design and land use
alternatives, temporary interventions enable the public to experience an approximation
of these alternatives and determine their preferences based on these experiences.
6 | LITE URBANISM
In a Cleveland example, a vacant and contaminated property creates a public
nuisance and detracts from adjacent property values. A permanent landscape will
be designed for the property once remediation has been completed. However,
the time frame for this remediation has not been determined, so the site is likely
to remain in a fallow state for the foreseeable future. Using the rapid prototype
model, a temporary landscape is being designed, one that is intentionally low-cost to
implement and flexible in its components. This prototypical landscape can be easily
adapted in response to the ways people use the space and this process of adaptation
will inform the future design decisions for the permanent landscape.
Conclusion
July 2009.
6
Duany, Andrés. “Transect Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association,
Vol. 68, No. 3, Summer 2002, American Planning Association, pp. 245-246
This is clearly the case in Cleveland, Ohio, where wildlife and vegetation are
7
8 | LITE URBANISM