Professional Documents
Culture Documents
l1
ABRAMS ARTISTS AGENCY, a California Case No.: 18STCVO21 12
12 corporation,
KAZARIAN/SPENCER/RUSKIN &
13 Plaintiff, ASSOCIATES, INC.’S ANSWER TO
COMPLAINT
14 V_
Date Filed: October 22, 2018
15 DEAN PANARO, an individual; Trial Date: Not Set
KAZARIAN/MEASURES/RUSKIN &
16 ASSOCIATES, INC., a California [The Honorable Stephanie M. Bowick, Dept.
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 19]
17
Defendants.
18
19
20 I?
21 50
22 57(/ 9(9 5b
4/0 30/
1-in 23 @//V I ‘
1:‘£20,9; 24
00k9’
fllbri
111:: 25
Hill
26
27
28
E GIZER 8
f‘.41§§§§uL.';5 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
39479.3
0 1 1 0
_‘ 1 Defendant Kazarian/Spencer/Ruskin & Associates, Inc., erroneously sued and doing
4 GENERAL DENIAL
5 In accordance with Civil Procedure Code section 43l.30(d), KMR denies, generally and
6 specically, each and every material allegation contained in Plaintiff’s complaint, and further
7 denies that Plaintiff has sustained any damages, or is entitled to any relief, as alleged in the
8 complaint.
9 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
10 Without waiving or excusing Plaintiff’ s burden of proof, or admitting that KMR has any
14 1. As a separate and distinct afrrnative defense to the complaint and to each of the
15 purported causes of action contained therein, Plaintiffs claims are barred in whole or in part
16 because the alleged covenants which form the basis for Plaintiff’s claims against KMR are
17 invalid, violate public policy and are unenforceable under applicable law. The non-compete and
19 unenforceable and invalid under Business and Professions Code section 16600.
21 (Unclean Hands)
22 2. As a separate and distinct afrrnative defense to the complaint and to each of the
W 23 purported causes of action contained therein, Plaintiffs claims are barred by the defense of
24 unclean hands. Plaintiff seeks to enforce an unenforceable and illegal agreement for purposes of
25 preventing fair business competition in a free enterprise system.
EARLY 23 3. As a separate and distinct afrmative defense to the complaint and to each of the
E %’R”.'z-11'.’-‘r“
35:1: i m
0 ~ 1 0
K 1 purported causes of action contained therein, Plaintiffs claims are barred, in whole or in part, by
i 2 the doctrines of waiver and estoppel. Plaintiff, in a writing dated July 13, 2018, delivered to
3 Dean Panaro on that date, expressly stated that the termination of Mr. Panaro’s employment was
4 “effective immediately.” KMR relied on this writing in deciding to hire Mr. Panaro thereafter.
5 FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
6 (Competition Privilege)
7 4. As a separate and distinct afrrnative defense to the complaint and to each of the
3 purported causes of action contained therein, Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by
9 the competition privilege: Plaintiff and KMR are competitors; KMR did not employ wrongful
10 means; KMR’s actions do not create or continue an unlawful restraint of trade; and KMR’s
14 5. The complaint, and each of the purported causes of action contained therein, is
15 barred to the extent that Plaintiff had knowledge of, acquiesced in, approved of, consented to, or
16 ratied some or all of the acts, conduct or omissions alleged in the complaint.
19 6. The complaint, and each of the purported causes of action contained therein, is
20 barred as the relief sought by Plaintiff does not protect the legitimate business interests of
21 Plaintiff, it is not reasonably limited in scope and it is not consistent with the public interest.
IIIEIII éié
39479.3 , monnsvsuuw
mm
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
A 1 2. For judgment in favor of KMR and against Plaintiff as to all claims against KMR in
‘ 2 the complaint;
3 3. That KMR be awarded its costs to the extent allowed by law; and
4 4. That KMR have such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
' 5
5 ‘ Respectfully submitted,
10
11
9 By; \ ,§_\
Devin A. McRae
\/I (,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Mg.’ 23
W,.’.‘;; 24
lira:
flat.’
33:2; 25
ms
26
27
EA 28
E GIZER E: 4
MCRAE LLP j_—?
39479.3 ‘ moknzvwuw ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
PROOF OF SERVICE
1 1
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 6420 Wilshire Boulevard, 17th Floor,
4 Los Angeles, California 90048.
13 IZI BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the business practice for collection and processing
of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I served the
14 following document(s) by enclosing them in an envelope and placing the envelope for
collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
15 correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course
of business at our Firm’s ofce address in Los Angeles, California within the United
16 States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. Service made
pursuant to this paragraph, upon motion of a party served, shall be presumed invalid if the
17 postal cancellation date of postage meter date on the envelope is more than one day after
the date of deposit for mailing contained in this affidavit.
18
El BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the
19 ofces of the above named addressee(s).
23 A [3 BY E-MAIL: I caused to be e-mailed a true copy to the e-mail addresses listed above.
25 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. “
25 \/ W _
27 VALERIE SEGURA ‘
E
IIIEIII 'CZ§§,§’LL,, ““““"""‘
1
ATTORNEYS AT uw 240179. 1