Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 5
I believe students were engaged by
the assignment in itself. They liked
CSTP 1: Engaging All being able to choose a common
- Colorful overheads/projections of
Students household appliance to focus on.
In what ways were students Google Slides and teacher example
engaged? How were - Students understood what to do. Although I had to set some limits like
- Reviewing expectations/rubric to
students not engaged?
How did students contribute
Began working on energy transfer no more than 5 microwaves per class
make sure students were clear on
to their learning? posters right away and were clearly period, everything went smoothly.
How did teacher and/or instructions
students monitor learning? with their on-topic discussions and My focus students were able to refer
How were the focus
- Teacher flowed/circulated through
behavior. to the class discussion and shared
students engaged and room answering questions
supported throughout the ideas to help them plan their
lesson?
projects. I checked in with my
students frequently to make sure
they understood the task.
Students worked well with each
other and participated during the
- Verbal/visual support; clear - Students worked on their posters
CSTP 2: Effective Learning class discussions. They were on task,
Environment directions, waited for students to - Worked with table partners to
How did students and which helped contribute to the
focus before starting lesson. support each other’s understanding
teacher contribute to an effective learning environment. I like
effective learning - Prepared work example to show and creativity
environment? to set my students up for success by
students - Engaged in class discussion
anticipating any questions/concerns
they may have.
Our lessons leading up to this project
helped students understand the
CSTP 3: Organizing subject matter. They were able to
Subject Matter
What actions of the NT - Students called upon prior lesson show me what they knew through
contributed to student - Very clear directions
knowledge to construct their their final work product. I now have
assimilation of subject (written/visual)
matter? models a wall full of bulletin boards filled
How did students construct - Asked questions to illicit student’s
knowledge of subject - Used their interactive notebooks with ~180 student work samples.
matter? response and gave feedback
What misconceptions did
as a reference along with Some of my students needed
students have and how technology resources clarification on different forms of
were they addressed by
the teacher? energy so I engaged them in
discussion and asked them to review
their resources to clarify matters.
I try to provide differentiated
instruction by offering multi-layered
CSTP 4: Learning - Clear rubric of assignment
Experiences and chunked instructions. To go
How were students
expectations
- Students began constructing their along with verbal instruction, I also
supported through - Class discussion and technology to
differentiated instruction? models using technology to support provide visual supports in the form
How did students share ideas
participate? their understanding as they needed of projected examples, directions,
How did the NT contribute
- Flow through room helping
rubrics, and behavior expectations.
to student learning? students and answering questions
Students participated by staying on
task during the assignment.
Students demonstrated achievement
of lesson objectives by being able to
create a mini poster of an appliance
of their choice with at least 5 types
CSTP 5: Assessing Student - Teacher presence around the room of energy highlighted, labeled, and
Learning
How did students and while leading the class through described. A handful of students only
demonstrate achievement
of lesson objectives?
directions/discussion contributed to - Completion of assignment clearly identified 4 different types of energy
In what ways did students student achievement showed student understanding at instead of 5. In this case, they
struggle or demonstrate
limited understanding? - Clarification of misconceptions the end of the assignment repeated themselves and gave their
What teacher actions that came up to allow students to descriptions different names but
contributed to student
achievement? continue with confidence they were referring to the same type
of energy (i.e. thermal vs. heat). I
believe my planning, scaffolding, and
monitoring contributed to student
achievement.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 5
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
Students achieved lesson objectives at a high degree. The class averages over the course of 5 class periods
were in the 91-97% range. Using technology, class discussion, and their own interactive notebooks as
To what degree did students resources, students were able to accurately identify and describe at least 5 types of energy present in a
achieve lesson objectives? common household appliance of their choice. They were able to utilize their creativity to produce a final work
product that included a hand-drawn, labeled drawing of the appliance along with a relevant title and at least 5
labels with descriptions of the types of energy and how they are present.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
This student received a B (88%) on
This student received an A (96%) on
the assignment. He followed most
the assignment. She followed
of the instructions but didn’t This student received an A (100%)
instructions closely and was able to
double-check the rubric prior to on the assignment. They double
produce a clear mini-poster.
turning in his assignment. He didn’t checked the rubric and made sure
To what degree did focus Although her spelling was incorrect
provide a description for one of his everything was included on the
students achieve lesson for a few words/labels, she was
objectives? types of energy and left the rubric assignment prior to turning it in.
able to properly label 5 types of
off his assignment. For the most This student clearly showed me
energy. It’s helpful that this student
part, I believe this student was able that they understand energy and
isn’t afraid to ask for clarification
to achieve the lesson objectives by can produce a work sample to
when she was unclear about
having his resources available to support that.
instructions or a specific type of
him while completing the
energy.
assignment.
For next time, I want to spend more time on discussing shared ideas that students brought to the table. I would
What would you do differently also create a sign in list to make sure I didn’t receive more than 5 of a single appliance per class period. It was a
next time? little stressful getting everyone sorted with an appliance to focus on if a bunch of students wanted to do the
same thing.
I think the top three lesson strengths were having a clear rubric for students to refer to, using technology to
share ideas and as a resource especially when it came to completing this drawings, and level of student
engagement/buy-in. The rubric encourages students to double check their work and reflect on their own
What were three top Lesson assignment prior to turning it in to be graded. Having technology readily available to allow students to
Strengths? communicate intentionally through Padlet and Google Classroom was helpful in making sure all of the students
had the same access to shared ideas. I definitely want to continue doing this lesson in the future because
students are actively engaged through their discussions, on-task behavior, and positive attitudes. I felt as if
they were greatly invested in producing a quality work product for this assignment.
My top three areas for improvement include spending more time on discussing shared ideas,
preparation/organization of a sign-in list or system to keep track of the appliances students chose, and review
of energy types that students tend to get confused. In the future, I plan to spend more time at the beginning of
What were three top areas for class to discuss the ideas students shared regarding the appliances they’re interested in completing their
improvement? project focused around. I also need to create a system to keep track of the appliances students are focusing on
so there isn’t too much repetition or stress with having to choose something else last minute. Additionally, I
want to spend a little more time on reviewing energy types that I noticed students got confused with this time
around.
Following this mini project, we moved towards focusing on how we extract the energy needed from food,
energy diagrams, and exothermic/endothermic reactions. Through class discussions, lab activities
What are next steps? (exothermic/endothermic changes and Calorimeter Design lab), and guided reading assignments from NSTA,
students will explore how we get our energy from food. We will finish our section on energy/nutrition before
modeling the cycling of matter and energy through a system.
Other Comments/Notes
N/A
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 5