Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The information available in the literature highlights the very low concentration of
bacterial flora present in the effluents (Bernet and Fines, 2000). In this study, the
maximum value obtained for bacterial flora was 119×104 NPP/100 ml. This
number is lower than the 1×108 NPP/100 ml generally found in urban wastewater
(Metcalf and Eddy, 1991), and higher than the flora 2.4×103 NPP/100 ml counted
in the hospital effluents by Emmanuel et al. (2005a). The low concentration of
bacterial flora and the ecotoxicity of hospital effluents have been attributed by some
authors to the presence of drugs and disinfectants in them (Deloffre-Bonnamour,
1995).
During the sampling campaign of 2002, 5 samples were collected at the inlet and
outlet of the septic tank in the framework of this study. The results obtained from
this campaign permit appreciating the capacity of the septic tank to retain certain
pollutants contained in the effluents studied. The efficiency of the septic tank for
the primary treatment of hospital effluents was assessed by using Eq. (6),
Where Cxe in the concentration of parameter “x” at the inlet of the septic tank
(input), and Cxs is the concentration of the same parameter at its outlet (effluent).
Table 2 supplies the first results on the efficiency of the septic tank in retaining
certain substances and organic material in particular.
The efficiency of the septic tank in treating hospital effluents is poor. Indeed,
regarding the retention of biodegradable substances their efficiency is in the region
of 35% (Gschlössl et al.,1999). Only 17% of COD concentration is retained.
Likewise for NO3, it is 39% for TSM (Total suspended matters) and Pb, 45% for
Ni. For chromium, it has been observed that the concentration in the influent is
lower than the concentration in the effluent of the septic tank. The results obtained
for Pb and Ni are probably due to the distance separating the inlet pipe from the
bottom of the tank. No efficiency was detected for total chrome. Considering the
volume used by the hospitals, this distance can also influence the settling of solids
and biochemical reaction cycles.
Most of the heavy metals present in water occur in ionic forms. Heavy metal ions
are acknowledged to be highly toxic and can accumulate in water and soils (Siegel,
2002; Bradl, 2004; Qin et al., 2006; Bhattacharyya and Gupta, 2007). Since the
values obtained for lead, nickel and chromium in this study are very high;
consumers of this water are exposed to major health problems. Despite the relative
abundance of clay in the soils of Port-au-Prince, several other factors may explain
the high concentrations of heavy metals in the groundwater studied. Indeed, clay
minerals in soils act as natural scavengers by removing and accumulating the
contaminants in the water that passes through the soil, through ion exchange and
adsorption (Bhattacharyya and Gupta, 2007). However, inorganic colloids, metal
speciation, metal concentration, pH, solid, solution mass ratio and contact time are
also very important in controlling the adsorption of heavy metals and their
distribution between soil and water (Bradl, 2004).
The information reported in the literature on the individual behavior of selected
heavy metals states that pH plays an important role in the adsorption and
precipitation behavior of chromium, lead and nickel in soils. Cr(III) adsorption
increases with increasing pH and soil organicmatter content whereas there is a
decrease of competing cations and dissolved organic ligands in the solution. The
increased adsorption of Cr(III) with increasing pH is caused by the cation exchange
reactions of hydrolyzed substances (Bradl, 2004). The adsorption of Cr (VI) onto
various adsorbents is a function of pH. Adsorption increaseswith decreasing pH due
to the protonation of hydroxyl groups (Rai et al., 1989). Bhattacharyya andGupta
(2007) showthat is not possible to carry out adsorption experimentswith Pb(II) at
pHN6.0, or for Ni(II) at pHN8.0, due to precipitation of themetals as hydroxides,
thereby introducing uncertainty into the interpretation of the results. Since thepHof
the septic tank effluents ranged from 7.43 to 7.86, it appears necessary in the future
to carry out experimental studies on soil pH and pursue research into the geological
and chemical characteristics of the selected site in order to understand the different
mechanisms governing the transfer of heavy metals to the groundwater.
In addition, excess consumption of nitrates in the human diet can lead to health risks
that include methamoglobinaemia in infants (blue baby syndrome) and possible
carcinogenic hazards. The toxicity of nitrates to humans is thought to result solely
from its reduction to nitrites. Nitrites are involved in the oxidation of normal
haemoglobin into methaemoglobin which is unable to transport oxygen to the
body's tissues (OMS, 1996).
According to international regulations E. coli must be non detectable in a sample of
100ml (OMS,1996; European Commission,1998b). A number of faecal coliforms
(E. coli) varying from 300 to 989 NPP/100 were counted in the hospital wellwater.
In addition to this high bacterial contamination, the literature reports considerable
circulation of Cryptosporidium sp. oocystes identified in the surface water and in
the water supply intended for human consumption in several districts of Port-au-
rince (Brasseur et al., 2002). The strong presence of E. coli in the wellwater
highlights the existence of amajor source of faecal contamination. The effluents
from septic tanks, agricultural organic waste and dumps are the sources most
usually considered as the potential causes of groundwater contamination.
Soils can be effective in removing microorganisms by predation, filtration and
asorption (Dussart-Baptista et al., 2003). Also, soils contribute to the adsorption of
nitrates contained in wastewater and the effluents of irrigation (Ibnoussina et al.,
2006). They are also one of the factors controlling the adsorption of heavy metal
ions (Kerndorf and Schnitzer, 1980). However, natural, unprotected areas, such
aswith karstic, sandy and gravely terrains and extremely vulnerable fractured
aquifers, allowthe rapidmovement of contaminants into the groundwater
withminimal attenuation, leading to the possibility of high risk situations. Although
the presence of clayey soils, tillage and peat will, in many instances, retard the
verticalmigration of microbes, preferential secondary flowpaths such as cracks in
clay materials can bypass the filtering effect of such soils.
The values measured in the hospital well water emphasise substantial
contamination of the groundwater resources of the study area and lead to the
assumption of a high health risk for the consumers of water from this water table.
Given the importance of this aquifer to the water supply of PPUC (Emmanuel et
al., 2004b), it will be necessary in future to identify the different sources of
pollution, extend the physicochemical characterisation of these waters and identify
the mechanisms governing the transfer of pollutants from the surface to the
groundwater.
The quality of a risk assessment depends on the validity of the different data used
to perform it: physicochemical, toxiclogical, epidemiological data, etc. as well as
the construction of realistic scenarios (Zmirou and Perrodin, 1999). However,
numerous uncertainties remain regarding the approach pursued. In the case of the
scenario studied, mention can bemade in particular of the choice of pollutants and
the toxicological data on the non or carcinogenic character of the pollutant minerals
in the drinking water. These uncertainties are almost always present in health risk
management.
Risk assessment remains a scientific activity that permits predicting the probable
effects of pollutants in human beings. Nonetheless, it is obvious that the results of
these assessments permit the adoption of policies designed to avert aworst-case
situation. The scenario presented here leads to a quantitative assessment of human
health risks.
In the case of the scenario studied, it should be noted that the degradation of
groundwater is due to human activities. The content measured for the mineral
pollutants is far higher than the values naturally present in thesewater resources. It
is necessary in the future to validate these initial results by further and more in-
depth assessments of risks to human health including, among other things, the
determination of other biological indicators of faecal pollution of water, especially
by Cryptosporidium spp., faecal enterococcus and the enteroviruses, coupled with
epidemiological studies.