See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/228608056

3-D Coordinate Transformations

Article · January 1999

CITATIONS READS
6 3,699

1 author:

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

The Tau Distribution View project

3D conformal coordinate transformations − also
known as similarity transformations (Blais 1972
and Bervoets 1992) and in the 2D case, sometimes
called Helmert transformations after the German
geodesist F.R. Helmert (1843-1917) − are often
given in the form

⎡E ⎤ ⎡X ⎤ ⎡ TE ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢N ⎥ = λ R κ φ ω ⎢ Y ⎥ + ⎢ TN ⎥ (1)
⎢⎣U ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ TU ⎥⎦

E, N and U (East, North, Up) and X, Y and Z are

3D "design" and "survey" coordinates respectively,
λ is a scale factor, R κ φ ω is a rotation matrix (the
product of rotations ω, φ and κ about the X, Y
and Z axes in turn) and TE , TN and TU are
translations between the origins of the two
coordinate systems. In the context of this paper,
(1) – often called a seven-parameter
transformation, three rotations three translations
and one scale factor – represents the mathematical
relationship between a constructed object in the
XYZ survey system and its transformed position in
the ENU design system. Its practical use in the
construction industry, where components of
structures are manufactured "off-site" and brought
together "on-site" can be explained in the following
way.

At the off-site location the object is measured in

situ and coordinated in an arbitrary XYZ survey
system. To confirm that it will fit in its designed
on-site location its XYZ coordinates are scaled and
rotated until the coordinate axes are parallel with
the ENU design axes. The origins of the two
coordinate systems are then brought together by
adding the translations. This has the effect of
superimposing the object over its design location
and its "fit" can be checked by comparing
coordinate differences.
Translation parameters may be eliminated from the iterative, requiring an initial transformation to
solution by using "centroidal" coordinates approximately align the two coordinate axes, a
E , N and U and X , Y and Z having a common simple method of determining the parameters of
the initial transformation is given and a worked
origin at the centroid of the control points. The
example of a problem is provided.
transformation then combines scale and rotation
only
2D CONFORMAL TRANSFORMATIONS
⎡E ⎤ ⎡X⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢N ⎥ = λ R κ φ ω ⎢ Y ⎥ (2a) C.F. Gauss showed that the necessary and
⎢U ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥ sufficient condition for a conformal transformation
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
from the ellipsoid to the map plane is given by the
complex expression (Lauf 1983)
[Translations can also be eliminated by moving the
origins to a common control point, both techniques
y + i x = f (χ + i ω) (3)
having the desirable effect of reducing the size of
the numbers involved in the computations.]
where the function is analytic,
Due to the nature of the matrix R κ φ ω it is not containing isometric parameters (isometric
possible to solve directly for the individual
rotations ω, φ and κ . But if the coordinate axes
are approximately parallel, a matrix RS of
independent small rotations δω, δφ and δκ can
be developed, which together with an approximate
value of the scale factor λ ′ with its small unknown
correction δλ ( λ = λ ′ + δλ ) enables a least
squares solution of δω , δφ , δκ and δλ using

⎡E ⎤ ⎡X ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢N ⎥ = ( λ ′ + δλ ) RS ⎢ Y ⎥ (2b)
⎢U ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

This solution technique requires iteration, each

iteration preceded by a transformation using (2b)
with the process being terminated when δω, δφ ,
δκ and δλ reach some predetermined negligible
values.

This paper shows how the general principles of

conformal transformation, originally developed by
C.F. Gauss (1777-1855), are used to derive a
transformation between two plane rectangular
coordinate systems which is equivalent to 2D
rotation, scaling and translation. This concept is
extended to 3D systems and the derivation of (1)
and (2) is set out together with a proof showing
that angles are preserved in the transformation.

The application of the least squares principle to the

solution of the transformation parameters is
explained and the necessary system of equations is
developed in matrix form. Since the solution is
The three rotations in order are:
(i) Rotation of ω about the X-axis. This rotates
the Y and Z axis to Y ′ and Z ′ with the X
and X ′ axes coincident.
Coordinates in the new system will be given
by the matrix equation
⎡X ′⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡ X ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ Y ′ ⎥ = ⎢0 cos ω sin ω ⎥ ⎢ Y ⎥
⎢⎣ Z ′ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣0 − sin ω cos ω ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦
(Rω )
⎡ c φc κ c ω sκ + sω sφc κ sω sκ − c ω sφc κ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
Rκ φ ω = ⎢ −c φsκ c ω c κ − sω sφsκ sωc κ + c ω sφsκ ⎥ (15)
⎢ sφ −sω c φ cωc φ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
where, for instance, c κ sφsω = cos κ sin φ sin ω .
Rotation matrices, e.g. Rα , R κ , R φ , Rω and
R κ φ ω are orthogonal, i.e. the sum of squares of the
elements of any row or column is equal to unity.
(11) They have the unique property that their inverse is
equal to their transpose, i.e. R −1 = R T which will
be used in later developments.

(ii) Rotation of φ about the new Y ′ axis. This

rotates the X ′ and Z ′ to X ′′ an d Z ′′ with THE 3D CONFORMAL TRANSFORMATION

the Y ′ and Y ′′ axes coincident. The 3D conformal coordinate transformation is an

extension of the 2D case; (14) and (15) combined
Coordinates in the new system will be given with a scale factor and translations to give (as
by the matrix equation previously stated)

⎡ X ′′ ⎤ ⎡cos φ 0 − sin φ⎤ ⎡ X ′ ⎤ ⎡E ⎤ ⎡X ⎤ ⎡ TE ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ Y ′′ ⎥ = ⎢ 0 1 0 ⎥ ⎢ Y′ ⎥ (12)
⎢N ⎥ = λ R κ φ ω ⎢ Y ⎥ + ⎢ TN ⎥ (1)
⎢⎣ Z ′′ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ sin φ 0 cos φ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ′ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣U ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ TU ⎥⎦
(R φ )
To prove that this transformation is indeed
(iii) Rotation of κ about the new Z ′′ axis. This conformal, i.e. angles between points in the XYZ
rotates the X ′′ and Y ′′ to X ′′′ and Y ′′′ with survey system are preserved when transformed into
the Z ′′ and Z ′′′ axes coincident. the ENU design system, consider the following.

Coordinates in the new system will be given (i) Let three points a, b and c in the survey
by the matrix equation system be transformed into A, B and C in
the design system; points in both systems
⎡ X ′′′ ⎤ ⎡ cos κ sin κ 0⎤ ⎡ X ′′ ⎤ located by vectors a, b, c and A, B, C.
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ Y ′′′ ⎥ = ⎢− sin κ cos κ 0⎥ ⎢ Y ′′ ⎥ (13)
Using (1) with R as the rotation matrix and t
⎢⎣ Z ′′′ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ′′ ⎥⎦ as the vector of translations, we may write
( κ)
R the transformation of a to A as

The coefficient matrices R κ , R φ , Rω above are A = λRa + t (16)

3D rotation matrices which can be multiplied
together (in that order) to give another rotation and similarly for the other vectors.
matrix R κ φ ω (Mikhail and Moffitt 1980).

⎡ X ′′′ ⎤ ⎡X ⎤ ⎡X ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ Y ′′′ ⎥ = R κ R φ Rω ⎢ Y ⎥ = R κ φ ω ⎢ Y ⎥ (14)
⎢⎣ Z ′′′ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦

with

5
 U C 2
• (a) u = uT u

B V and remembering that for orthogonal

• N rotation matrices R −1 = R T , hence
θ′
Z
U •A R T R = I where I is the identity matrix

Ru = ( Ru) Ru = u T R T Ru = u T u
c E
• (b)
2 T
b
•
θ v
u Equating (a) and (b) gives Ru = u which
•a
can be substituted into (18) to give
X Y
Ru u
U= =R = Ru (19)
u u
Figure 4. Conformal transformation
of two vectors.
and using similar reasoning
(ii) Let θ be the angle at a in the survey system
between the vectors u = b − a and V = Rv (20)
v = c − a ; and θ′ the complementary angle
at A in the design system between vectors (v) In the design system the angle θ′ between U
U = B − A and V = C − A . and V is given by the dot product
cos θ′ = U • V = U T V and using (19)
(iii) In the survey system, the angle between the and (20) we may write
vectors is found from the vector dot product
of unit vectors u and v
cos θ′ = ( Ru) Rv = u T R T Rv = u T v
T
(21)
cos θ = u • v = u 1v1 + u 2 v 2 + u 3 v3
Comparing (17) and (21) shows that θ = θ′ and
where u 1 , u 2 , u 3 and v1 , v 2 , v3 are the constitutes a proof that angles are preserved by the
transformation (1). [Baetslé (1966) has a similar
components of the two unit vectors, noting proof but in a slightly different form.]
u
that a unit vector is defined as u =
u Conformal mapping has a long mathematical
where u is the magnitude. history. Vlcek (1966) in a discussion paper on the
topic notes that the famous French mathematician
The dot product is equivalent to a matrix
Liouville (1847) determined all the conformal
multiplication, hence
transformations in an analytical way and in a
theorem bearing his name showed that the only
cos θ = u • v = u T v (17) ways of conformal representation of space on itself
are:
(iv) In the design system we may use (16) to
write 1. by translation and rotation, accompanied
by constant magnification,
U = B − A = λ R b + t − (λ R a + t) = λ R u 2. by inversion with respect to the sphere,
which, at the very least, demonstrates that
and the unit vector U conformal 3D transformations have been with us
for a long time.
λRu Ru
U = = (18)
λRu Ru

Now using matrix algebra we may write two

results (a) and (b)

6
THE 3D ROTATION MATRIX FOR SMALL ANGLES CENTROIDAL COORDINATES

For small angles δω , δφ , δκ the rotation matrix In a solution for the transformation parameters, the
R κ φ ω may be simplified by the approximations three translations TE , TN and TU can be
eliminated by adopting a system of "centroidal"
cos δω ≈ 1 coordinates, i.e. a system of coordinates whose
origin is at the centroid of the n control points.
sin δφ ≈ δφ (radians)
sin δκ sin δω ≈ 0 Denoting the coordinates of the centroid (in both
systems) with a subscript g
and (15) becomes the anti-symmetric (or skew-
symmetric) matrix (Harvey 1986). X1 + X 2 + + X n
Xg =
n
⎡ 1 δκ −δφ⎤ Y1 + Y2 + + Yn
⎢ ⎥ Yg = (24)
RS = ⎢− δκ 1 δω ⎥ (22) n
⎢⎣ δφ −δω 1 ⎥⎦ Z1 + Z 2 + + Z n
Zg =
n
It should be noted that RS is no longer orthogonal
and similarly for E g , N g and U g . Centroidal
but its inverse will, nevertheless, be given by its
transpose ( RS−1 = RST ), since it is the approximate coordinates (denoted with an over-bar) are

form of the orthogonal matrix R κT φ ω (Hotine 1969, X i = X i − Xg

p. 263).
Yi = Yi − Yg (25)
In the least squares development to follow it is Zi = Zi − Zg
useful to split RS (the rotation matrix for small
angles) into two parts with similar expressions for E , N and U .

⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡ 0 δκ −δφ⎤ Thus, using centroidal coordinates [see (2), where

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
RS = I + δR = ⎢0 1 0⎥ + ⎢ −δκ 0 δω ⎥ (23)
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ δφ − δω 0 ⎥⎦
Assuming small angles is a convenient and
practical technique of simplifying R κ φ ω (whose
non-independent elements are functions of the
rotation angles ω , φ and κ ) to RS (whose
independent elements are δω , δφ and δκ ), thus
enabling the solution of δω, δφ and δκ via a
system of linear equations (see the following
section on least squares solution). Solutions, based
on this assumption, will not be theoretically correct
but will be "practically correct" if an iterative
process is adopted where each n th iteration is
preceded by a transformation using previously
derived values, and the process terminated when
δω n , δφ n and δκ n converge to negligible values.
A practical test on the assumption of small angles
in the initial transformation will be revealed by
noting whether the solution converges.
the origins of both systems are common] the
transformation is reduced to a combination of scale
and rotation only and the size of the numbers
involved in the computations is reduced. After
solving for the scale factor λ and the elements of
the rotation matrix R κ φ ω , the translations can be
found by substituting the coordinates of the
centroid into (1) and re-arranging
⎡ TE ⎤ ⎡ Eg ⎤ ⎡X g ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ TN ⎥ = ⎢N g ⎥ − λ R κ φ ω ⎢ Yg ⎥ (26)
⎢⎣ TU ⎥⎦ ⎢U g ⎥ ⎢Zg ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION OF TRANSFORMATION
PARAMETERS
To develop the least squares solution of the
parameters, consider (2b) which pre-supposes that
the rotation angles are small which may be due to
(i) an initial transformation which approximately
aligns the coordinate axes, or (ii) a knowledge that

7
the rotations are small. Bearing this in mind ⎡δω ⎤
(noting that a method of determining the ⎢ δφ ⎥ ⎡Ei − λ′ Xi ⎤
⎢ ⎥
parameters of an initial transformation is discussed x = ⎢ ⎥, fi = ⎢N i − λ ′ Yi ⎥
⎢ δκ ⎥
later) we may use (23) to write for each of the n ⎢ ⎥ ⎢U i − λ ′ Z i ⎥
⎣ ⎦
control points an equation of the form ⎣ δλ ⎦

⎡E ⎤ ⎡ X ⎤ ⎡ vE ⎤ Equation (29a) is a "standard" least squares form

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ (Mikhail 1976)
⎢N ⎥ = ( λ ′ + δλ ) ( I + δR) ⎢ Y ⎥ + ⎢ v N ⎥ (27)
⎢U ⎥ ⎢ Z ⎥ ⎢⎣ vU ⎥⎦
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ v + Bx = f (29b)

where vE , v N and vU are residuals at the control with the solution for the parameters as
points. Now, since the rotation angles and δλ are
( )
−1
small, their products will be negligible x = BT WB B T Wf (30a)
( δλ δR ≈ 0 ), thus (27) can be expanded and re-
arranged as where W is the weight matrix associated with the
observations, which in this case are the triplets of
⎡δω ⎤ centroidal coordinates X i , Yi , Z i and E i , N i , U i .
⎡ vE ⎤ ⎡ 0 −Z Y X ⎤ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ δφ
⎢vN ⎥ + λ ′ ⎢ Z 0 −X Y ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ Mikhail (1976 pp. 64-66) defines weight matrices
⎢ δκ ⎥ W, cofactor matrices Q and variance-covariance
⎢⎣ vU ⎥⎦ ⎢− Y X 0 Z ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦ δλ matrices Σ as follows
⎣ ⎦ (28)
⎡E ⎤ ⎡X⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ W = Q −1 (30b)
= ⎢N ⎥ − λ′ ⎢ Y ⎥
⎢U ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Σ = σ 02 Q (30c)
An equation of the form of (28) can be written for
each control point and represented symbolically in where the elements of Q are estimates of the
partitioned matrix form as variances and covariances of the observations and
σ 02 is the reference variance whose posteriori
⎡ v1 ⎤ ⎡ B1 ⎤ ⎡ f1 ⎤ estimate is (Mikhail 1976, p. 288)
⎢v ⎥ ⎢B ⎥ ⎢f ⎥
⎢ 2⎥ + ⎢ 2⎥x = ⎢ 2⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
(29a)
σ 02 =
v T Wv f Wf − x B Wf
=
T T T
( ) (30d)
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ n−u n−u
⎣ v n ⎦ ⎣ Bn ⎦ ⎣fn ⎦
n and u are the number of observations and
where each component v i ( i = 1, 2, … , n ) of the
unknown parameters respectively.
vector of residuals v and Bi of the matrix of
coefficients B is The partitioned form of W in (30a) is

⎡ vE i ⎤ ⎡ 0 −Zi Yi X i ⎤ ⎡W1 0 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
v i = ⎢ v N i ⎥ , Bi = λ ′ ⎢ Z i 0 − X i Yi ⎥
⎢0 W 0 ⎥
W=⎢
2 ⎥ (30e)
⎢⎣ vU i ⎥⎦ ⎢− Yi X i 0 Z i ⎥⎦ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 Wn ⎦
and the vector of parameters x and the
components fi of the vector of numeric terms f where each diagonal element Wi contains weights
are associated with the coordinate triplets of each i th
control point, and the elements of Wi must be
obtained from a pre-analysis of the survey
techniques used to determine their values. The
off-diagonal elements of W are null matrices,

8
indicating that the observations (coordinate
triplets) are considered to be independent of each (ii) In the survey system, the angle θ between
other. the vectors is found from the dot product

In this paper, and the example following, it is cos θ = a • b = a1b1 + a2 b 2 + a3 b3 (33)

assumed that the coordinates (derived from survey
measurements) are independent of each other and
all having equal precision. This allows W to be where a1 , a2 , a3 and b1 , b 2 , b3 are the
replaced by the identity matrix I in (30a) to give components of the two unit vectors.

( ) A unit vector p , perpendicular to the plane

−1
x = BT B BT f (31)
containing a and b, can be obtained from
the vector cross product

CALCULATION OF APPROXIMATE ROTATIONS b×a

p = = p1 i + p 2 j + p 3 k (34)
sin θ
The solution above requires that rotations be small,
i.e. RS approximates R κ φ ω . To ensure this a where
preliminary (or initial) transformation is made
using centroidal coordinates and approximations b 2 a3 − b 3 a 2
p1 =
for the rotation matrix R A and scale factor λ A sin θ
b3 a1 − b1 a3
⎡X ⎤ ⎡X ⎤ p2 =
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ sin θ
⎢Y⎥ = λ A RA ⎢ Y ⎥ (32)
⎢Z ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥ b1 a2 − b 2 a1
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ p3 =
IN ITIAL O RIGIN AL sin θ

An approximate vale of λ A can be obtained by A second cross product (a × p) gives a third

ratios of distances in the survey and design systems,
unit vector q perpendicular to both a and
but for most practical applications will be very close
to unity. The approximate rotation matrix R A can p
be derived in the following manner.
q = a × p = q1 i + q 2 j + q 3 k (35)
(i) Shifting both the survey and design systems
to the centroid and choosing two control where
points A and B gives the vector pairs a and
b in the survey system, and A and B in the q 1 = a 2 p 3 − a3 p 2
design system whose components are the q 2 = a3 p1 − a1 p 3
centroidal coordinates of the respective q 3 = a1 p 2 − a2 p1
points. Each vector can be reduced to a unit
vector using the following: if Thus q , a and p are the unit vectors of
v = v1 i + v 2 j + v3 k is a vector whose
another orthogonal centroidal coordinate
components are v1 , v 2 , v3 ( i , j , k being unit system ξ( Xi) , η( Et a) and ζ( Zeta) .
vectors in the directions of the X, Y and Z- ζ
axes respectively) the unit vector
v A
v = = v1 i + v 2 j + v3 k has •
v η
v1 v v ξ
^
components v1 = , v 2 = 2 , v3 = 3 p
r r r
^
a ^
where v =r = v12 + v 22 + v32 is the • q

magnitude. Centroid

9
 Figure 5. ξ ηζ coordinate system where the left-hand-side of (39) can be
considered as an initial transformation of the
survey coordinates. Thus with an
(iii) The ξ ηζ and X Y Z centroidal systems,
approximate rotation matrix R A = R 2T R1
are rotated with respect to each other, the
ξ -axis making angles α1 , β1 , γ 1 with the and the approximate scale factor λ A we
have (32) as given above where
X , Y and Z -axes respectively. Similarly,
the η and ζ -axes make angles α 2 , β 2 , γ 2
and α 3 , β3 , γ 3 . The elements of q are the ⎡R 11 R 12 R 13 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
direction cosines cosα1 , cosβ1 and cos γ 1 RA = R 2T R1 = ⎢R 21 R 22 R 23 ⎥ (40)
(Wolf 1974) and ⎢⎣R 31 R 32 R 33 ⎥⎦

ξ = X cos α1 + Y cos β1 + Z cos λ1 (36a) R A has the same form as R κ φ ω (15) and values of
the approximate rotations ω A , φ A and κ A can be
or calculated from

ξ = X q1 + Y q 2 + Z q 3 (36b) −R 21
tan κ A = (41)
R 11
Similarly for the elements of a and p we
may write
R 11
cos φ A = (42)
η = X a1 + Y a 2 + Z a 3 cos κ ′
(36c)
ζ = X p1 + Y p2 + Z p3

Combining (36b) and (36c) in the form of a R 33 cos κ ′

cos ω A = (43)
rotation matrix R1 gives R 11

An example of the computation of approximate

⎡ξ ⎤ ⎡q1 q 2 q3 ⎤ ⎡ X ⎤ ⎡X⎤
⎢ ⎥ = ⎢a a a ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ = R ⎢ ⎥ rotations is contained in the Appendix.
⎢ η⎥ ⎢ 1 2 3⎥ ⎢ Y ⎥ 1⎢Y ⎥ (37)
⎢⎣ ζ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣p1 p2 p3 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Z ⎥⎦ ⎢Z ⎥
⎣ ⎦
CONCLUSION
(iv) Replacing survey system vectors a and b
with design system vectors A and B in steps This paper has presented the necessary equations
and computation technique for the practical use of
(ii) and (iii) yields unit vectors Q , A and P ,
3D conformal transformations in survey
and a second rotation matrix R 2 measurement. These transformations, combined
with least squares, can be usefully employed on
⎡ξ ⎤ ⎡Q1 Q 2 Q3 ⎤ ⎡ E ⎤ ⎡E ⎤ large construction projects where components,
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ often manufactured "off-site", must be brought
⎢ η⎥ = ⎢ A1 A 2 A3 ⎥ ⎢ N ⎥ = R 2 ⎢ N ⎥ (38)
together "on-site" to fit within a design coordinate
⎢⎣ ζ ⎥⎦ ⎢P P P ⎥⎢ U ⎥ ⎢U ⎥
⎣ 1 2 3 ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ system. The least squares transformation method
can be used to compare the off-site component,
(v) Re-arranging (38) and substituting into (37), measured in situ in XYZ survey coordinates, with
using the orthogonal property of rotation its proposed location in the on-site ENU design
( )
matrices R 2−1 = R 2T , gives coordinates; comparison being via the coordinate
residuals at common points. This pre-analysis
"tool" can be used to prevent costly (and often
⎡E ⎤ ⎡X⎤ embarrassing) misalignment of components in a
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ large engineering structure.
⎢N ⎥ = R 2T R1 ⎢ Y ⎥ (39)
⎢U ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

10
An example computation of the transformation
parameters and residuals of a simple plane figure Harvey, B.R. 1986, 'Transformation of 3D co-
ABC with measured XYZ coordinates and ENU ordinates', The Australian Surveyor, Vol. 33, No.
design coordinates is provided in the Appendix. 2, June 1986, pp. 105-125.

REFERENCES Helmert, F.R. 1880, Die mathematischen und

Baetslé, P.L. 1966, 'Conformal transformations in
three dimensions', Photogrammetric Engineering,
Vol. 32, No. 5, September 1966, pp. 816-824.
Bebb, G. 1981, 'The applications of
transformations to cadastral surveying',
Information-Innovation-Integration: Proceedings of
the 23rd Australian Survey Congress, Sydney,
March 28 – April 3, 1981, The Institution of
Surveyors Australia, pp. 105-117.
Bellman, C. and Anderson, L. 1995, 'Close range
photogrammetry for dimensional control in
shipbuilding', SAMS'95: Proceedings of the 3rd
Symposium on Surveillance and Monitoring
Surveys, Melbourne, Australia, November 1-2,
1995, ed, M.R. Shortis and C.L. Ogleby,
Department of Geomatics, University of
Melbourne, pp. 1-8.
Bellman, C. Deakin, R. and Rollings, N. 1992,
'Colour photomosaics from digitized aerial
photographs', Looking North: Proceedings of the
34th Australian Surveyors Congress, Cairns,
Queensland, May 23-29, 1992, The Institute of
Surveyors Australia, pp. 481-495.
Bervoets, S.G. 1992, 'Shifting and rotating a
figure', Survey Review, Vol. 31, No. 246,
October 1992, pp. 454-464.
Bird, D, 1984, 'Letters to the Editors: Least squares
reinstatement', The Australian Surveyor, Vol. 32,
No. 1, March 1984, pp. 65-66.
physikalischen Theorem der höheren Geodäsie,
Vol. 1, Die mathematischen Theorem, Leipzig.
Helmert, F.R. 1884, Die mathematischen und
physikalischen Theorem der höheren Geodäsie,
Vol. 2, Die physikalischen Theorem, Leipzig.
Hotine, M. 1969, Mathematical Geodesy, ESSA
Monograph 2, United States Department of
Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Jordan/Eggert/Kneissl, 1963, Handbuch der
Vermessungskunde (Band II), Metzlersche
Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
Lauf, G.B. 1983, Geodesy and Map Projections,
TAFE Publications, Collingwood.
Liouville, J. 1847, 'Note au sujet de l'article
precedent', Journal de Math. pures et appl., Vol.
12.
Mikhail, E.M. 1976, Observations and Least
Squares, IEP−A Dun-Donelley, New York.
Moffitt, F.H. and Mikhail, E.M. 1980,
Photogrammetry, 3rd ed, Harper & Row, New
York
Shmutter, B and Doytsher, Y. 1991, 'A new
method for matching digitized maps', Technical
Papers 1991 ACSM-ASPRS Annual Convention,
Baltimore, USA, Vol. 1, Surveying, pp. 241-246.

Blais, J.A.R. 1972, 'Three-dimensional

similarity', The Canadian Surveyor, Vol. 26, No.
1, March 1972, pp. 71-76.

DSB, 1972, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol.

VI, C.C. Coulston Editor in Chief, Charles
Scribner's Sons, New York.

Featherstone, W.E. 1996, 'An updated explanation

of the Geocentric Datum of Australia and its
effects upon future mapping', The Australian
Surveyor, Vol. 41, No. 2, June 1996, pp. 121-
130.

11
Sprott, J. S. 1983, 'Least squares reinstatement', matrix Rκ φ ω with values κ = 10 ,
The Australian Surveyor, Vol. 31, No. 8,
φ = 94 , ω = 310 then (iii) rounding the
December 1983, pp. 543-556.
transformed centroidal coordinates to the
Vlcek, J. 1966, 'Discussion paper: Simultaneous nearest 0.1m and "adding back"
three-dimensional transformation', E g , N g and U g .
Photogrammetric Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 2,
March 1966, pp. 178-180. The solution for the transformation parameters is
accomplished in the following steps.
Wolf, P. R. 1974, Elements of Photogrammetry,
McGraw–Hill, New York. Step 1: Shift the origin of the survey system to
the centroid by subtracting X g , Yg and
APPENDIX
Z g from the coordinates of A B and C
Calculation of transformation parameters between then calculate the unit vectors a and b .
survey and design locations of the figure ABC.
A B C
X -240.000 380.000 -140.000
Survey system X, Y, Z
Y 20.000 -240.000 220.000
1620.0 X
B 740.0 Y Z 120.000 -540.000 420.000
340.0 Z
Table 1. Survey system centroidal coordinates
A
1000.0 X • 1240.0 X g
1000.0 Y Centroid 980.0 Y g a = −240 i + 20 j + 120 k
1000.0 Z 880.0 Z g
a = −0.891953 i + 0.074329 j + 0.445976 k
C
1100.0 X
b = 380 i − 240 j − 540 k
1200.0 Y b = 0.540874 i − 0.341605 j − 0.768610 k
1300.0 Z

Step 2: Use the vector dot product (33) to

calculate angle θ between a and b
Design system E, N, U
2540.6 E a • b = cosθ = a1 b1 + a2 b 2 + a3 b3
B 1668.1 N = − 0.850607457
1216.1 U
θ = 148.277801360
A
1911.9 E • 2000.0 E g
1435.2 N Centroid 1500.0 Ng
554.1 U 800.0 U g Step 3: Use the vector cross product (34) to
C calculate the unit vector p perpendicular
1547.5 E to the plane containing A, B and the
1396.7 N
629.8 U centroid

b×a
p = = p1 i + p 2 j + p 3 k
Figure A sin θ
= − 0.181090 i + 0.845086 j − 0.503027 k
Note: In Figure A the ENU design system
coordinates have been generated from the
Step 4: Use the vector cross product (35) to
XYZ survey system coordinates by (i)
calculate the unit vector q perpendicular
shifting to the centroid of ABC,
(ii) transforming to E , N and U using (2) to a and p
with a scale factor λ = 1 and rotation

12
 q = a × p = q1 i + q 2 j + q 3 k ⎡Q1 Q 2 Q3 ⎤
= − 0.414278 i − 0.529438 j − 0.740317 k ⎢ ⎥
R 2 = ⎢ A1 A 2 A3 ⎥
⎢P P P ⎥
⎣ 1 2 3⎦

Step 5: Form the rotation matrix R1 in (37) from ⎡ 0.933776 0.065506 −0.351812⎤
⎢
the elements of the unit vectors q , a and = ⎢ −0.327359 −0.240782 −0.913707 ⎥⎥
p ⎢⎣ −0.144563 0.968366 −0.203392⎥⎦

⎡ q1 q 2 q 3 ⎤ Step 9: Compute the numeric values in the

⎢ ⎥ approximate rotation matrix R A using
R1 = ⎢ a1 a 2 a 3 ⎥
⎢⎣p1 p2 p3 ⎥⎦ (40).

⎡ −0.414278 −0.529438 −0.740317 ⎤ R A = R 2T R1

⎢ ⎥
= ⎢ −0.891953 0.074329 0.445976⎥
⎢⎣ −0.181090 0.845086 −0.503027 ⎥⎦
= ⎢ 0.012267 0.765774 −0.642993⎥
Step 6: Shift the origin of the design system to
the centroid by subtracting E g , N g and
U g from the coordinates of A B and C
then calculate the unit vectors A and
B.
⎡−0.068675 −0.640878 −0.764565⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.997564 −0.053536 −0.044728⎥⎦
R A is of similar form to R κ φ ω and, if
required, values of the approximate
rotations ω A , φ A and κ A can be
calculated from it by using (41), (42) and
(43).

A B C −R 21 −0.012267
-88.100 540.600 -452.500 tan κ A = =
E R 11 −0.068675
N -64.800 168.100 -103.300
κ A = 190o 07 ′ 39′′
U -245.900 416.100 -170.200

Table 2. Design system centroidal coordinates

R 11
cos φ A =
A = −88.1 i − 64.8 j − 245.9 k cos κ ′

A = −0.327359 i − 0.240782 j − 0.913707 k φ A = 85o 59′ 59′′

B = 540.6 i + 168.1 j + 416.1 k
B = 0.769429 i + 0.239255 j + 0.592230 k R 33 cos κ ′
cos ω A =
R 11
ω A = 129o 52′ 40′′
Step 7: Use the unit vectors A and B in steps 2
and 3 to calculate the angle between A
and B, then the unit vector P followed Step 10: Use (32) with R A from Step 9 and
by the unit vector Q
λ A = 1 to transform the original X Y Z
centroidal coordinates (Table 1) to an
P = −0.144563 i + 0.968366 j − 0.203392 k
initial set of approximately transformed
Q = 0.933776 i + 0.065506 j − 0.351812 k centroidal coordinates to be used in the
least squares solution.
A B C
Step 8: Form the rotation matrix R 2 in (38) X -88.0833 540.5791 -452.4958
from the elements of the unit vectors Y -64.7877 168.0919 -103.3042
Q , A and P Z -245.8534 416.0761 -170.2227

13
 Table 3. Initial Survey system centroidal ⎡ vE A ⎤ ⎡ 0.011 ⎤
coordinates (Iteration 1) ⎢v ⎥ ⎢ 0.006 ⎥
⎢ EB ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ vE C ⎥ ⎢−0.016 ⎥
The least squares solution of δλ (correction to the ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
approximate scale factor) δω , δφ and δκ (small ⎢vN A ⎥ ⎢ 0.009 ⎥
rotation angles) follows; noting that the ⎢ v N ⎥ = ⎢−0.002 ⎥ metres
⎢ B⎥ ⎢ ⎥
approximate scale factor is assumed to be unity ⎢vN C ⎥ ⎢−0.008 ⎥
(λ ′ = 1) . ⎢v ⎥ ⎢ 0.037 ⎥
⎢ UA ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ vU B ⎥ ⎢−0.011 ⎥
Step 11: With a re-arrangement of the order of ⎢v ⎥ ⎢−0.026 ⎥
residuals in (30) the coefficient matrix B ⎣ UC ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
becomes
and the transformed centroidal
⎡ 0 245.8534 −64.7877 −88.0833⎤ coordinates of A, B and C can be found
from (2b) with the elements of RS given
⎢ 0 −416.0761 168.0919 540.5791⎥
⎢ ⎥ above ( δω = 0.28′′ , δφ = −171
. ′′ ,
⎢ 0 170.2227 −103.3042 −452.4958⎥
⎢ ⎥ δκ = 0.40′′ ) and
⎢ −245.8534 0 88.0833 −64.7877 ⎥
λ ′ + δλ = 1.000 041 870 .
⎢ 416.0761 0 −540.5791 168.0919⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ −170.2227 0 452.4958 −103.3042⎥ A B C
⎢ 64.7877 −88.0833 0 −245.8534 ⎥ X -88.0892 540.6055 -452.5164
⎢ ⎥
⎢ −168.0919 540.5791 0 416.0761⎥ Y -64.7906 168.0985 -103.3079
⎢ 103.3042 −452.4958
⎣ 0 −170.2227 ⎥⎦ Z -245.8635 416.0888 -170.2259

and the vector of numeric terms is Table 4. Survey system centroidal coordinates
(Iteration 2)
⎡−0.0167 ⎤
⎢ 0.0209⎥ Step 14: A second iteration using the centroidal
⎢ ⎥ coordinates of Table 4 gives solutions as
⎢ −0.0042⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ −0.0123⎥ ⎡δω ⎤ ⎡ 3.27 × 10−8 ⎤ radians ⎡0.01 ⎤ sec
f = ⎢ 0.0081⎥ ⎢ δφ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 3.22 × 10−9 ⎥ radians ⎢0.01 ⎥ sec
⎢ ⎥ x= = =
⎢ 0.0042⎥ ⎢ δκ ⎥ ⎢ 176. × 10−8 ⎥ radians ⎢0.00 ⎥ sec
⎢ −0.0466⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −8 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎣ δλ ⎦ ⎢⎣ −3.13 × 10 ⎥⎦ ⎣0.031⎦ ppm
⎢ 0.0239⎥
⎢ 0.0227 ⎥ These solutions, which are at least an order of
⎣ ⎦
magnitude less than the corrections of the first
iteration (demonstrating that the solution is
Step 12: Forming the matrix products B T B converging) are probably due to rounding errors in
(normal coefficient matrix) and B T f the calculations and the first iteration results can
(vector of numeric terms) and solving be assumed as "exact".
(31) gives the solution as To transform any additional points in the XYZ
survey system to the ENU design system the
⎡δω ⎤ ⎡ 1.38 × 10−6 ⎤ radians ⎡ 0.28 ⎤ sec following process should be adopted:
⎢ δφ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ . ⎥ sec
−8.30 × 10−6 ⎥ radians ⎢−171
x=⎢ ⎥=⎢ = ⎥
(a) convert to centroidal coordinates then
⎢ δκ ⎥ ⎢ 1.93 × 10−6 ⎥ radians ⎢ 0.40 ⎥ sec
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −5 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ perform an initial transformation as per Step
⎣ δλ ⎦ ⎢⎣4.1870 × 10 ⎥⎦ . ⎦ ppm
⎣ 41870 10 using (32) with the numerical values of
R A as determined in Step 9,

Step 13: Substituting the vector x into (30) gives

the residuals at A, B and C

14
 ⎡X ⎤ ⎡X ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢Y⎥ = λ A RA ⎢ Y ⎥ (32)
⎢Z ⎥ ⎢Z ⎥
⎣ ⎦ IN ITIAL ⎣ ⎦ O RIGIN AL

(b) then transform to the ENU system using

(2b) modified by setting the approximate
scale factor to unity ( λ ′ = 1) and adding
back the coordinates of the centroid in the
design system.

⎡E ⎤ ⎡ X ⎤ ⎡ Eg ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢N ⎥ = (1 + δλ ) RS ⎢ Y ⎥ + ⎢N g ⎥
⎢⎣U ⎥⎦ ⎢ Z ⎥ ⎢U g ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

with the values for δω , δφ , δκ and δλ

from the least squares solution as per Step 12

15

View publication stats