Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Management
System at NBP
Group Members
We are writing this to pay our gratitude to our respected instructor Sir Qamaruddin Maitlo who
assigned us such a learning oriented project to compile the long report on performance management
system at NBP. This project has only been possible due to the continuous support, encouragement
and guidance of our respected instructor.
We would also like to thank Sukkur IBA who provided us the required resources and required facilities
to complete the project effectively.
We would also like to mention that the project is the fruit of mutual support and teamwork of the
members of the team.
2.1 HR Values……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
keep motivated all the employees and maintain total industrial harmony.
2.1 HR Values:
We believe that
The problem is attach with this peer review is that it involves the biasness of employees and
make the rating poor because in competition employees are being jealous with each other.
The drawback of this review is that employee is being criticized by other stakeholders who
have no direct information regarding the performance or the can be biased while rating because
employees have right to rate so organization is unable to identify the intension behind the poor
rating or very rating of employees based on may be favouritism or personal relations among
employees.
3.1.4 Self-Assessment
It is also preferred in most of organization and can be used in conjunction with any another
review method listed above. Most of the companies are using this because it helps in identifying
the which employee need training and where they need guidance in career path. It also the
employee to receive some constructive feedback from the manager and supervisor.
The drawback of this review process is that employees sometime rate themselves very good
against the manager rating so it creates conflict among employee and manager.
Organizational and job factors are outside the control of employee and create hindrance in
meeting the organizational objectives, in this situation manager is responsible for taking
corrective action for smooth running of operations. Some of these issues are defined below:
2 Individual Factors
Most of the time manager are confused to identify the poor performance or misconduct of
employees and find in difficulty while assessing so distinguishing factors are defined below:
Poor Performance
Misconduct
Breach of discipline
Wrong attitude rather than performing well
Wilful reject for instruction of competent authority
Grieve able and ad judicable behaviour
PERFORMANCE FACTOR
Professional knowledge
Improving corporate culture
Decision making ability
Ability to visualize and plan
Ability to act on emergent situation
Prerequisite
Knowledge of Knowledge of job
mission and goals in question
Behaviour
Performance Planning
Improvement plan
Performance Performance
Execution Assessment
Performance Review
Association Practice
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN incompletely takes after Graphic Rating Scale technique.
Here every individual has diverse arrangement for assessing. Practically junior to senior
workers have comparative configuration to fill in however there is some exemption for the
senior level. The arrangement is outlined in the way like Fist page must be topped off by the
workers without anyone else yet they need to sign in every one of the pages. There is point
framework for assessing representatives.
These are progressing execution input and instructing: he ought to request the input on
fulfilment of assignment .it is very suggesting for the appraisers and appraisers both to
make utilization of STAR shape (connected) to record achievements/basic occasions
all through year and utilize it at the season of evaluation. In NAP, STAR Model is taken
after, STAR remains for circumstance, activities and results
The idea of worker engagement is worked exceptionally well in NAP. Every single
Junior representative are solace with their quick administrator. Every single junior
worker and their chief are settled on one page. like when leaves and unlucky
deficiencies are concerned, assess, appraiser and commentator are altogether
encouraged to stay away from nonattendances from work and timetable their leaves and
authority assignments as needs be empowering us to settle the PMS evaluation stage
and consequent process well in time.
Performance Assessment
Evaluation and advising is given a considerable measure of significance in the
execution administration handle. This is the phase in which the representative gets
mindfulness from the appraiser about the regions of changes and furthermore data on
whether the worker is contributing the normal levels.