PAN-AFRICANISM

THE TORTUROUS PATH OF A RACE

By Naiwu Osahon Leader World Pan-African Movement
Of course, Africans sold their kith and kin into slavery. Yes, the
slave merchants found willing accomplices amongst us and in
exchange for cheap ridiculous items like a mirror, tobacco,
cutlass, gun or a drink, we did their dirty jobs for them.
But if you expect us to feel guilty about our negative role in
slavery, you are not being realistic because Africans, like the
other species of the human race, have their own greedy ones too.
In relative terms though, only a very small minority of Africans
benefited commercially from our enslavement considering the
quantities of mirrors etc they acquired and they were loathed by
the captive majority. Names of such African traitors like the
notorious Kosoko of Lagos still invoke hate today in Africans when
ever mentioned.
Collectively, Africans did not understand what slavery was really
all about. Even including the traitors, we had no idea we would
never see our dear ones again or how far the ocean stretched to
keep them apart from us. Parents hoped that their children being
kidnapped into slavery would be treated no worse than we treat
our houseboys today. Houseboys or girls in Africa are slaves in a
sense but slavery to an African is like an adoption. Africa is almost
a free slavery system, more akin to the Greek or Roman system.
A parent who cannot cope with bringing up a child may hand over
the child to another parent in a better position to give the child a
good home. A parent may give a child to a Chief because usually,
Chiefs are well placed to provide food and shelter through the
communal tax systems. The slave in an African home often has
the rights of the adopted child.
Even now, a hundred years after the supposed end to cross
Atlantic slavery, Africans on the continent still do not know the
hell enslaved Africans went through in the hands of the slave
masters.
You have kept your historical perspective on slavery intact
whereas in Nigeria for instance, the only reminder of it is a
solitary slave chain preserved as a tourist attraction in a run-down
hut in Badagry, a coastal suburb of Lagos. Ghana has more
terrifying evidence in their fantastic Castles, but Africans on the
continent hardly visit or relate to the evidence. One of the Castles
in Ghana has been given over to the African Descendants
Association. They have a guest book you sign, and looking
through, you see very personal and emotional comments by black
visitors from abroad to the Castle. For you, the reaction when
faced with damning evidence is painful. It is painful to remember
that you were sold here like cattle but for us Africans on the
continent, our memory of slavery is completely blank.
We sold you into slavery alright but Africa as a whole was not just
waiting to be dismembered without a fight. Names of our warrior
nationalists, mostly Kings and Queens abound: Queen Nzingha of
Angola, King Nana Kwamena Ansa of Ghana, Nehenda of
Zimbabwe, Anowa of Ghana, Ashanti King Prempeh, the Jaja of
Opobo, Queen Idah of Benin City, Oba Overamwen Nogbaisi of
Benin City, Madam Tinubu of Lagos, Queen Amina of Zaria,
Behanzin Hossu Bo Willi of Dahomey, Samory Toure of Mali,
Moremi of Ile-Ife, Mohammed Ahmed the Mahdi of Sudan, Nefertiti
of Nubia, Mohammed Ben Abdulla Hassen the mad Mullah of
Somaliland, Chaka the Zulu and many others, gave good account
of themselves in our honour. Africans had to be beaten and
dragged on board slave ships.
MILITARY PAN-AFRICANISM
On slave ships, many Africans starved themselves to death, cut
their own throats with their fingernails, threw themselves
overboard to escape torture and slavery and quite a number of
them succeeded in over powering their captors and taking over
their slave ships as was the case with AMISTAD or Joseph Cinque,
the son of a Mendi King of Sierra Leone.
On Plantations, Africans continued their acts of rebellion through
sabotage at work or by running away into hardly accessible
swamps, forests and mountains to continue the fight for their
freedom. Africans cursed their tormentors in work songs,
communicated with each other, even under severe restrictions,
with body language and signs, and transformed their religious
indoctrination to their advantage by replacing, for instance,
‘Heaven’ with ‘Africa’ in Christian songs about the joys of Heaven.
Flying away to Zion and crossing the River Jordan was translated
by slaves to mean the joyful return home to Africa through the
Atlantic. Death was seen as a welcome means of returning to
Africa and with that, African slaves conquered the fear of torture
and death.
Amongst the slaves, one of our wicked traits soon began to show.
Slaves spied on other slaves to win a lousy cup of porridge. They
betrayed confidence to gain small favours from their masters but
our finer nature overwhelmed and produced many nationalists
and inspirers of freedom in the new world such as: Blyden,
Frederick Douglas, Nat Turner, Sam Sharpe, Gabriel Prosser,
Denmark Vasey, Paul Cuffe, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth,
Martin R. Delany and numerous others.
Then came August 1791, when the slaves of the Island of San
Domingo revolted under the leadership of Toussaint L’Ouverture,
Boukman, Dessalines, and Henry Christophe. The struggle lasted
for twelve years, during which time, they defeated in turn, the
local whites and soldiers of the French monarchy, a Spanish
invasion force, a British expedition of some 60,000 men, and a
French expedition of similar size under Bonaparte’s brother-in-
law. The defeat of Bonaparte’s expedition in 1803 gave us Haiti,
our first independent anti-slavery state.
The revolt is the most successful slave revolt in history and to
quote C.L.R James in Black Jacobins,: “The odds it had to over-
come is evidence of the magnitude of the interests involved. The
transformation of slaves, trembling in hundreds before a single
white man into a people able to organise themselves and defeat
the most powerful European nations of their day is one of the
great epics of revolutionary struggle and achievement.”
Haiti’s revolution inspired other liberation wars and in particular
the growth of what Prof. John Henrik Clarke described as
‘intellectual Pan Africanism,’ expressed immediately then through
the building of cultural and religious ties across state barriers.
To quote John Henrik Clarke in Pan Africanism, a brief history of
an idea: “In 1804, Jacques Dessalines, the Governor-General of
Haiti, issued an appeal for American blacks to settle in his Island.
In 1819, Henri Christophe, King of Haiti, negotiated for the
settlement of 200,000 black Americans who ultimately settled in
Liberia. Denmark Vasey sought the assistance of Haiti in his slave
conspiracy of 1822. Jean-Pierre Bayer, who later became
President of Haiti, pushed for similar emigration and the Maryland
Haitan Society was formed in 1921 by free blacks to facilitate
emigration.”
In the continent itself, the military Pan-Africanists were reacting to
the so called scramble for Africa, which in effect was the
transformation of the early nineteenth century system of slavery
into the system of colonialism – an extension of slavery. Two new
European powers (Germany and Belgium) entered the scene, and
with the old colonial powers (mainly England, France and
Portugal) began to spread their control from the coastal holding
stations to the hinder-land. There was much rivalry amongst the
scramblers so, like a bunch of hungry demon butchers, they
assembled around a table in Berlin in 1884, carving knives in
hand, map of Africa as their prized beef, to chop away to their
heart’s content. Vandalising our economic resources beyond
recognition to enrich their homelands. Ruining our mind and
personality with their religion. Turning us into apes of their
decadent culture.
We fought back with, for instance, the Zulu wars in South Africa,
the Islamic or Mahdi wars in the Sudan, the Ashanti wars in the
Gold Coast and others that will last for the next hundred years.
INTELLECTUAL PAN-AFRICANISM
Intellectual Pan Africanism received a boost with its series of
congresses from 1900. Europe grudgingly granted some of us
‘flag independence’ with deafening fanfare to distract our
attention while they stayed quietly on in the guise of neo-
colonialism. Now their cartels bestride our continent like giant
Octopuses, crushing and absorbing all indigenous initiatives
thrown in their paths.
The question now is, why has intellectual Pan Africanism, to which
Africa surrendered its militancy, not routed our tormentors in a
hundred years of organising congresses? Why are you still the
underdogs here and I their footmat back in Africa?
A Trinidadian Lawyer called Henry Sylvester Williams, practising
in Britain at the time and married to a white woman, convened
the first Pan African Conference in 1900.
I am aware of the arguments for and against Henry Sylvester
Williams as a major figure in the African consciousness movement
and I think being able to call a Pan African Conference at the time
ought to confer some honour on Mr. Williams.
This is not to say, however, that the content of this conference
should escape the critical judgement of history. Mr. Williams’ Pan
African Conference was attended by thirty delegates mostly from
the USA and the West Indies. Its aims were to act as a forum of
protest against the aggressiveness of white colonialists; to bring
people of African descent throughout the world into closer touch
with one another; and to start a movement which would secure to
all African races living in civilised countries, their full rights and
would promote their business interests.
Our Sylvesters of the 1900s obviously did not have a great deal of
respect for Africa if they had to describe us as uncivilised. In any
case, they did not camouflage the fact that the conference was to
promote their individual private business interests in our name.
Actually, the opening address of the conference was given by a
white man, the Bishop of London at the time, who supported the
needs of Africans: “To be educated into a sense of responsible
self-government.” Isn’t that condescending?
The conference addressed a petition to Queen Victoria through
the British Government protesting against the treatment of
Africans in South Africa and Rhodesia at the time. The petition, in
a nutshell, could be interpreted in modern idiom as follows:
Our mighty and generous Queen,
The mother of the Universe,
The great one without blemish,
Whose forgiveness we are not worthy of,
But whose mercy we seek all the same being your meek and
dutiful servants,
Nurtured and civilised in the warmth of your matronly kindness.
We beg your majesty on our bended knees to spare a thought,
however small,
For those we left behind in the jungles of Africa.
To which the all conquering white goddess replied:
“Okay boys, I will see what I can do.”
Do not quote this as the reason why Mr. Williams’ conference is
not counted amongst our Pan African Congresses today, but I
would be surprised if other reasons are stronger.
Dr. W.E.B DuBois attended that first conference and seems to
have been greatly influenced by it. A great deal has been written
and said about Dr. DuBois. That he was the brightest star ever to
have graced our firmament of ideas or words to that effect. I am
too inconsequential to even begin to challenge such a reputation
in any way. So, if you will pardon me, I will take nothing away
from this intellectual colossus. But I have problems accepting that
he served me any better than poor Henry Sylvester Williams did. I
am talking about how DuBois relates to me as an individual. I
know that DuBois wrote some thought provoking books in his life
time and called four Pan African Congresses between 1919 and
1927 that set in motion the tradition that has brought me to this
point now in the history of Pan Africanism.
But DuBois himself never claimed to have been the indispensable
focus in our chequered journey. After all, he admits in his essay:
Four congresses that he, through his congresses, was not on our
behalf: “seeking control of neither our economic and social life
nor our independence.” So, we might be tempted to ask: What
was this brilliant man seeking in our name then?
We know, for instance, that DuBois was half black and never tired
of reminding everyone who cared to listen to him about his
aristocratic white half. Mind you, his was very much the era of the
darker you are the further down the social ladder of progress you
were confined. So, DuBois had no respect for Garvey, not because
Garvey was dark hopefully.
DuBois’ congresses dissociated from the patriotic Pan African
posture of the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) of
Marcus Garvey, opting instead, for the rather tame tactics of
begging Europeans politely to be nice to their African servants.
Garvey wanted African progress through self development and
self efforts. DuBois insisted that co-operation with whites was vital
to our struggle. In fact, the opening speech at DuBois’ first Pan
African congress claimed that European governments were not
the enemies of Africans, a sentiment that flavoured all his
resolutions afterwards on our behalf.
Whites responded by assisting DuBois’ programmes while
vehemently opposing and discrediting Garvey’s and banning
Garvey’s newspapers throughout Africa.
But did ordinary Africans forget Garvey? May be a little story from
my past can help provide a possible answer. It is a true story
about my mother. I have never told anyone the story before and I
hope my mother would forgive me for exposing her so far away
from home. I don’ t know if you can guess my age but my mother
is over seventy years old and she has never been inside the four
walls of any school. It is not something to boost about but that is
the position. She never had the opportunity to go to school. She is
the picture of ancient African motherhood, the type white
television thinks they are taunting us with. My mother does not
watch white television and does not miss it.
One evening after a busy weekend of reading publications on Dr.
DuBois and Marcus Garvey, I felt like teasing my mother a little. I
asked her on the spur of the moment, half expecting a rebuff, if
she had ever heard of a man called Marcus Garvey? My mother,
without appearing to have seriously thought about my question
said in my native language, Bini: “Is that not our son who lived
abroad?”
I was her only son who had lived abroad until that time so
obviously she did not mean me. I prodded her further and found
that by calling Garvey son, my mother was not only appropriating
Garvey, she was showing her pride in him as a dedicated African
son.
Encouraged by my discovery, I asked her about DuBois: “I have
never heard of that one,” she said promptly but innocently. I have
still not been able to figure out how my illiterate mother who had
never travelled more than twenty kilometres from our home base
could relate to Garvey and not DuBois. I have not tried to
influence her on the matter since either. I do not think she knows
about my activities in the Pan African Movement yet. I am saving
my shock for when I hope to ask her in about ten years time, what
she knows about her real son.
If at that point, my activities in the Pan African Movement have
still not directly touched the lives of the likes of my mother, then
it would be difficult for me to claim to have been relevant.
I don’t want you to go away thinking that I have no respect for Dr.
DuBois. Of course, he was a great man, only that he never
managed to win my illiterate mother over to his side like Garvey
did and that is what has been bothering me really about
intellectual Pan Africanism.
FLAG INDEPENDENCE
The fifth Pan African Congress was the first serious one in the
redeeming sense. Without its bold features, the need to continue
the congresses would have been lost forever.
The congress, held in Manchester in 1945, coincided with the
second conference of the World Federation of Trade unions, thus
enabling several trade union delegates from the African world to
attend and broaden the narrow intellectual base of the Pan
African Congress for the first time. It, of course, also helped to
lock Pan Africanism more firmly into the Marxist – socialist politics
of the unionists, thereby diverting us witlessly from our original
goal of racial emancipation, to a formless, rhetorical and tedious
sin-song about the working class uniting to over throw the
nebulous bourgeois. The truth of the matter is that traditional
African politics is not homogeneous and there is no reason why
the fortunes of a whole race of people should be condemned to
the status of the working class for ever. A billion virile,
determined and ambitious people scattered all over the
economies of the world can not and must not be restricted from
reaching even beyond the stars.
That fortunately is the kind of positive and forthright posture that
informed the broad activities of the team of George Padmore,
C.L.R. James, Kwame Nkrumah and others at the fifth congress on
the issue of our independence. They not only demanded
immediate independence for all African countries, they
threatened to use every means, including violence if necessary,
to achieve their aims. Kwame Nkrumah, Jomo Kenyatta, Nnamdi
Azikiwe who was represented and many other potential African
leaders left the congress determined to do battle with our
colonisers. Out-break of mass anti-colonial struggle followed
throughout Africa. Armed uprising in Kenya and Algeria, mass
nationalist parties in Zaire, Ghana and Nigeria etc. This phase of
the struggle led to Ghana’s independence in March, 1957, under
the leadership of Kwame Nkrumah. Ghana’s example electrified
the African world resulting in scores of free African countries
between 1960 and 1963.
Ghana’s independence also provided intellectual Pan-Africanism
with its first real foothold on the continent. Nkrumah, in
collaboration with Padmore, consolidated this by convening the
first Conference of Independent African States (CIAS), in
furtherance of their Pan-Continental ideas, in Accra in April, 1958.
The participants of this historic conference were Ghana, Ethiopia,
Libya, Liberia, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia and the United Arab
Republic. These were the then independent African states except
South Africa which was actually invited but refused to come
because the colonial powers were not also invited.
Other meetings followed until a broader conference of
independent African states took place in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in
June 1963, establishing for the continent, the OAU, a loose
interstate arrangement.
The OAU, of course, did not fulfil the ambition of Kwame Nkrumah
for a strong political union of all African states but it opened the
Pan-African ideology institutionally to non-blacks. This is how
George Padmore defended the trend at the time: ” In our struggle
for national freedom, human dignity and social redemption, Pan-
Africanism offers an ideological alternative to communism on the
one side and tribalism on the other. It rejects both white racialism
and black chauvinism. It stands for racial co-existence on the
basis of absolute equality and respect for human personality.”
I have no quarrel with all that, but I think we needed to have
asked Uncle Padmore:
(1) Why other races can join our institutions and would not let us
join theirs?
(2) Why we are the only race of people in the world striving
desperately to tag on to others. We have Black-Arabs, Black
Marxists, Black-Muslims, and Black-Eskimos. Isn’t that saying
something for our self esteem?
(3) Whether having a union of our own necessarily makes us any
more racist than the EU, the Jewish World Congress, and the Arab
League etc?
(4) If our propensity to be seen to be identifying with our
oppressors has helped to solve our being the racial underdogs of
the world?
(5) And whether we do not need to tackle our peculiar racial
problems first before contributing our wonderful expertise at
problem solving to the rest of the world?
After all, charity ought to begin at home.
Also, Nkrumah and Padmore needed to have been asked to
explain how their Pan-Continental politics was going to solve the
deteriorating problems of the African Diaspora? 40% of the Black
world do not live in Africa and are, as a result, ignored by the
OAU.
The overall success of the 5th Pan African Congress blinded us to
some of its not so sound pre-occupations. The 5thPAC set off
many half-baked diversionary ideas which unfortunately led to the
failure of the 6th Pan African Congress. The convenors of the
6thPAC did not reckon, for instance, with the selfish interest of the
newly independent African governments of the time so:
(a) They let government delegations dominate the congress,
(b) Who in turn prevented leading Pan Africanists from
participating.
(c) Non-Africans, without obvious commitment to Pan African
ideals, were able to attend as delegates.
(d) The regular negative ideological division between our pseudo
socialists and capitalists occupied centre stage.
(e) And, of course, University dons, as usual, were able to use
congress to enhance their CVs and show off their borrowed
language facilities and richly embroidered danshikis.
And yet, the 6th Pan African Congress succeeded in filling a
yearning vacuum and keeping the movement alive, at least, in
academic circles, 29 years after the 5th congress. More papers
than ever before, were submitted or read at the 6thPAC and a
great deal more resolutions were left behind for scholars to pore
over till eternity as to their motives etc. The 6thPAC piled
considerably more library materials, and gathered more delegates
and observers, some 600 of them at one count, than all
congresses before it, put together. To the extent that the 6thPAC
achieved these feats administratively, therefore, it deserves to be
recognised.
But did the congress touch the lives of ordinary Africans in the
streets? No. Was the 6thPAC any better than the jamborees called
first, second, third and fourth congresses? No.
Ask any African in the streets of Europe and America about the
6thPAC and you would draw a blank. Ask any grassroots African
on the continent about Pan Africanism today and he would think
you are speaking Greek. The 6thPAC has not stopped the
continued racial rape and murder of our people in the Diaspora
nor has it educated Africans on the continent, sixteen years later,
to think beyond the severely circumscribed OAU.
Only the 5th congress was able to make immediate direct impact
on our lives with its independence fire sweeping rapidly across
colonial Africa soon after the congress. The 5thPAC set the
standard by which to measure the success of all future PACs. The
6thPAC, therefore, was no more than a boring charade and if Pan
Africanism is to be saved now, it must be moved beyond the
constraining walls of our Ivory Towers, the deadly hold of our
narrow-minded political leaders and deposited squarely on the
laps of virgin Africans.
These were precisely the sources of my motivation when I began
the campaign in 1982, as a private initiative, for the 7th Pan
African Congress to convene within three years in a liberated
African country. My principal ambition was to use the congress to
institutionalise the Pan African Movement and unite the black
world. I was building a farm house facility (I called the Monument
to African civilisation), at Ilogbo-Eremi in the Badagry local
government area of Lagos State in Nigeria, at the time, as venue
for the 7th Pan- African Congress. The idea was to set up a
possible meeting place that would be grand and yet rural in
setting and relatively cost free to participants, to avoid recourse
to government subvention or sponsoreship and, therefore,
influence. At the time, I thought that the congress could hold in
Nigeria in 1985. A picture of the still being constructed
‘Monument’ was eventually published in the Guardian newspaper
of Nigeria, on Saturday February 4th 1984, with the following
caption:
” This is the house Mr Naiwu Osahon is building. When completed,
it would be one of the most unique, artistically designed houses
ever built any where, says Mr Osahon of the house located on a
suburban farmland. Mr. Osahon …on the proposed retreat for
local and visiting artistes says: ‘Discussions are already being
held abroad about holding the next Pan African Congress at the
Craft-farm House in 1985.”
Obstacles which I considered were mainly responsible for our
disunity and lack of focus as a family included:
(1) Foreign religions and ideologies (which in all respects treat us
as inferior human beings). These pull us in all sorts of directions
to keep us divided despite our being the most marginalised
people on the face of the earth right now. It is not in the interest
of any dominating ideology for victims to unite or have a common
focus. Peculiar spirituality serves to bind and encourage claims of
ownership and birthright. Religion or spirituality is the greatest
mobilising strategy available to man and we have nothing of our
own as a rallying force like Islam is to the Arabs or Judaism to the
Jews.
(2) Allowing colonisers (particularly Arabs who do not consider
themselves even remotely as Pan Africanists) to participate in and
sponsor our congresses. Arab occupiers of Northern Africa
continue to exploit and dominate original African native owners of
the land. The war in Sudan is ethnic cleansing against our race
and is funded massively by the Arab League through Libya and
Saudi Arabia. Arabs have their League but do not want blacks to
have one. We as a race have not been able to focus on how to
liberate Northern African blacks as we have done against white
racists in Southern Africa because Northern Africa Arabs are equal
partners with blacks in the OAU.
(3) Allowing our ‘Movement’ to be hijacked by reactionary African
political leaders running our governments. These are leaders tied
to the apron strings of our colonial masters for hand-outs which
our leaders promptly divert to their individual private accounts
abroad for personal gains. They are too busy enriching
themselves at our expense to care about our collective welfare.
I strongly believed that while we could excuse the OAU perhaps,
to serve the interest of all and sundry as a continental
contraption, our ‘Movement’ cannot afford such a luxury. Not
when there is liberation, reparations and repatriation wars still to
be fought and won world-wide. Our Movement must aggressively
tackle racism and our marginalisation if we are ever to
collectively make progress as a people. And our ‘Movement’ must
remain permanently on the alert thereafter. The best guarantee
of this is a civil society controlled ‘Movement’ with grassroots
Africans from the continent linking with the grassroots black
Diaspora to wrestle power from our opportunistic political elite
controlling our governments. The grassroots black world need to
take their collective destiny into their own hands through an
institutionalised ‘Movement’ that gives equal treatment to both
governments and individual delegations. I was implacable over
the 7thPAC institutionalising the Pan African Movement as a
vibrant civil society compliment or challenge to the lame-duck
OAU.
To keep rancour to the barest minimum at congresses, I insisted
that decisions and resolutions of the ‘Movement’ must be fine-
tuned and worked out at preparatory conferences and workshops
etc in advance, with congress being used only to endorse. The
preparatory activities of the 7thPAC were, therefore, to focus
principally on the following three planks:
(a) To agree a body of resolutions and decisions to be known as
THE BLACK AGENDA which could be up-dated now and again at
regional and state conferences to become the bible or focus of
activities of the black race, including black governments and
individuals.
(b) To chisel out a strong and dynamic constitution for the
institutionalised ‘Movement’ wielding together, black
governments and black civil societies in a symbiotic relationship
with leadership resting solely in the hands of civil society. The
‘Movement’ would have to develop a peculiar spirituality for such
a leadership (or moral leadership of the black race) not to be
controversial.
(c) To set up a ‘Foundation’ to ensure that the ‘Movement’ or
Black League’ would never have to beg for financial support from
anyone, particularly from extraneous sources. The philosophy of
the ‘Foundation’ (called PANAF at the time), being that every
black person in the world, alive or yet un-born, owes PANAF a
hundred units of his or her local currency once in a life-time.
These pre-occupations were embodied in the first set of
documents written and distributed lavishly by me around the
world from 1982 to announce the convening of the 7thPAC in
Africa in 1985.
Responses to my ‘CALL’ were generally enthusiastic, over the
convening of 7thPAC which was described as overdue, but
lukewarm on Nigeria (which at the time was under the jackboot of
a vicious military dictatorship), serving as host. C.L.R. James, who
was one of the first renowned Pan Africanists at the time to
receive our delegation in London, was full of support for an
African country hosting the congress. He was not too fussy about
the politics of the possible host African government. However, the
series of letters addressed to Babangida, the self-proclaimed
Military President of Nigeria at the time to provide 7thPAC with
logistic support in the area of easy visas and adequate security
for delegations were ignored. President Dos Santos of Angola
wrote us the most inspiring letter of the time but was sorry he
could not play host because of the debilitating civil war in his
country. Zimbabwe was more interested in hosting the
Commonwealth Heads of State Conference at the time and Ghana
complained of poor financial resources.
While we were still shopping for a possible host country, the
Foreign Minister of Nigeria, Professor Bolaji Akiyemi, out of the
blues in 1987, announced the Nigerian government’s interest in
convening the 7thPAC. A failed coup de’tat caused some changes
in the Nigerian government with Brigadier Ike Nwanchukwu
replacing Prof. Akinyemi as Foreign Affairs Minister. The Brigadier
was not interested in the 7thPAC and wanted to know what it
meant and who it was affiliated to. Apart from abysmal ignorance
about self history, South African PAC added to the confusion.
However, the earlier announcement of the Nigerian government’s
interest increased focus on 7thPAC and my efforts which were
independent all along of the Nigerian government’s attempted
hijack.
The make shift leadership arrangement we had relied upon was
formerly structured in 1987 involving a two-tier arrangement with
the 7thPAC International Secretariat located in Lagos. The
ultimate leadership committee was called the International Co-
ordinating Committee (ICC) and had as pioneer members,
Professor Kwesi Prah, a Ghanaian working in Kenya at the time,
B.F.Bankie, a Ghanaian-Gambian living in London then and Naiwu
Osahon, based in Lagos, as the Convernor/Chairman.
Reporting to the ICC was the International Steering Committee
(ISC), which had as members: Ayi Kwei Armah; Nee Kwati Owoo;
Robert Hayfron-Benjamin Beye and Boutros Boutros Ghali.
By January 1989, the ISC had been scrapped due to lack of
perfomance by its members perhaps because of the cumbersome
two-tier system in operation and was replaced by an expanded
ICC comprising of Naiwu Osahon, Chairman; Prof. Antonio Neto,
Angola; Tau Napata, Jamaica; Prof. Alfred Opubor, Nigeria; Dr.
Boutros Boutros Ghali, Egypt (who wrote trying to discourage us
from institutionalising the Pan-African Movement but stayed on as
committee member even when he became the Secretary General
of the UN); Eunice Neto Foreid, Portugal; Dr. Ona Ekhomu, USA;
Prof. H. Cunha Jr. Brazil; H. E. Dr. Henri Bangou, Guadeloupe; Dr.
Laura M. Torres Souder, Guam; Amar Bentoumi, Algeria (who later
withdrew because of the focus of the ‘Movement’); Dr. Joycelyn
Loncke, Guyana; Dr. Digna Castaneda Puerta, Cuba; Pauulu
Kamarakafego (Roosevelt Brown who still represents us now at
the UN and was the pioneer sponsor of the 6thPAC, Bermuda;
Hon. Mr. Bernard Narokobi, Papua New Guinea; Dr. Cyril. E.
Griffith, USA; Grace Mera Molisa, Vanuatu; Prof. Mary Frances
Berry, USA.
By 1990, we had received several letters of support from the likes
of Leopold Sedar Senghor living in France at the time; C.L.R.
James, before he died, insisting that the congress must be
convened in an African country. The Prime Minister of the
Commonwealth of Bahamas; the President of the United Republic
of Tanzania; The Minister of Justice of Papua New Guinea; the
governments of the Republics of Cote D’ Ivoire, Liberia, Togo,
Angola, Zaire, Ghana, Guadeloupe Senator in France, Boutros
Boutros Ghali as Minister of State for Foreign affairs in Egypt. We
had influenced Chief Abiola of Nigeria sufficiently to try to steel
our thunder by embarking on a ‘Reparations’ programme of his
own, which was eventually sold to the OAU with our active lobby.
By 1992, we had established national branches or committees of
the Pan-African Movement in the following countries; Angola,
Australia, Barbados, Belize, Benin Republic, Bermuda, Botswana,
Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Curacao,
Dominica, Equartorial Guinea, Fiji, France, Gambia, Germany-
Benelux, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guam, Guinea, Haiti, Ivory Coast,
Jamaica, Kenya, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria,
Papua New Guinea, Portugal Senegal, South Africa, St. Kitts, St
Lucia, St. Maarten, Surinam, Swaziland, Switzerland, Tanzania,
Togo, Trinidad, UK, USA, Zaire, Zimbabwe and several new
national representatives were being cultivated.
The UK national branch was the very first committee of the
7thPAC to be set up by Naiwu Osahon. It was launched on the
10th of October, 1988 at Flat 69, Schomberg House, Vincent
Street, Westminster, London, S.W.1 occupied at the time by Prof.
Antonio Neto. Founding members of the UK committee included
Neto, Bankie, Babu, Pepukayi, Napata, Gotzmore and Bing who
was elected the protem secretary.
We started having problems with London right from its take off
because, as things turned out, the branch was dominated by self-
declared Marxists. They wanted to take over the leadership of the
ICC and move its International Secretariat to London because
according to them, communications were easier from there.
Besides, they were not comfortable with my anti-Marxism or
foreign ideology posture and attempt to institutionalise the
‘Movement’. Also my determination to exclude Arabs of Northern
Africa from the union was a headache. One of their staunchest
supporters at the time was Prof. Kwesi Prah who wrote that: “We
can not bind the next generation to an institutionalised
‘Movement.” My answers at the time were to ask why that should
stop us from trying? And how did other races achieve their
institutions and union without some first steps? No answer to
these questions ever came from Prah or London or may be it
came through their gradual withdrawal from our fold to encourage
and team up with Uganda eventually. They tried desperately to
gain access to our International Secretariat’s address list before
they finally dropped out of our hold three years after their launch.
Our (ICC) impression of them at the time was that they were on
an ego trip desperate to etch their names on posterity for
convening a Pan African Congress regardless of quality of the
congress.
My criticism of DuBois for bequeating to us the culture of
jamboree congresses appeared also to have alienated some
supporters of the intellectual icon, including his son who took
offence and started looking for opportunities to scuttle our efforts.
Nkrumah’s son too soon became less active on the ICC because
his father, along with Padmore were blamed for diluting the spirit
of Pan-Africanism with their defence of all comers’ congresses
that welcomed Arab colonisers and Marxist domination all in one
breath.
Preparatory conferences of the 7thPAC around the world included;
(a) Hamilton Bermuda (From July 20 – 22, 1990)
(b) Bridgetown, Barbados (From 21 – 22 September, 1991)
(c) Solidarity with Cuba (Saturday 7th December, 1991,
Bridgetown, Barbados)
(d) Port-of Spain, Trinidad (Second regional conference of the
Caribbean Pan African Movement (From 27 – 28 August, 1993).
(e) Savannah, Georgia, USA (From 1 – 3 May, 1992)
(f) Toronto, Canada (where ZAWADI KWAFRICA was launched for
the first time in the world by Naiwu Osahon (From June 23 – 27,
1993).
The inaugural meeting of the BLACK THINK TANK (BTT) of the Pan-
African Movement, now known as THE THINK TANK OF THE BLACK
WORLD (TTB) took place from 1 – 8 August, 1992, at ASCON,
Topo, Badagry, Lagos Nigeria. The BTT was attended by: Naiwu
Osahon, Chairman; Catherene Acholonu, Nigeria; Denese
Bradford, USA; Duane Bradford, USA; Tom Dalgety, Guyana; Viola
Davis, Barbados; C.M. Eya-Nchama, Equatorial Guinea; Diane
Forte, USA; Malinali Meza Herrera, Mexico; Onwuchekwa Jemie,
Nigeria; Owei Lakemfa, Nigeria; Olusegun Maiyegun, Nigeria;
Rudy Mattai, USA; Kinja Mulegwa-Migabo, Zaire; T.C Nwosu,
Nigeria; Osagie Obayuwana, Nigeria; Yinka Ogunsulire, Nigeria;
Yeye Akilimali Funua Olade, Nigeria; Charles C. Roach, Canada;
Gbenga Sonuga, Nigeria. Two members who could not get to the
venue of the BTT, but who had paid to attend were: Joycelene
Loncke, Guyana and G. Mawa-Kiese Mawawa, Congo.
The BTT examined the issues: “Why are we so blessed and yet so
poor?” “Why are we not benefiting as a people from the
civilisation we pioneered and what are we to do to get back on
our feet again as one family?” THE BLACK AGENDA is a product of
the BTT’s deliberations and it lays down the rules to guide the
activities of black governments, individuals, organisations,
communities, family units, institutions. The BTT also produced the
CONSTITUTION of the Pan African Movement and approved
ZAWADI KWAFRICA (ZA) as the name of the Pan-African
Foundation. Zawadi Kwafrica are Swahili words meaning gifts of
and from the people of Africa.
Members of the ICC in 1993 included: Naiwu Osahon, Chairman;
Charles C. Roach, Vice Chair; Pauulu Kamarakafego, Vice Chair; H.
E. Dr. (Senator) Henri Bangou, Guadeloupe; Dr. Thomas Cornell
Battle, USA; Gerlin Bean, Jamaica; John Benjamin, Anguilla; Prof.
Mary Frances Berry, USA; Farika Birhan, Maroons; Dr. Michael L.
Blakey, USA; Duane Bradford, USA; Musa Cham, Gambia; Bobby
Clarke, Barbados; Dr. John Henrik Clarke, USA; Tom Dalgety,
Guyana; Viola Davis, Barbados; M.K. Dingake, Botswana; Babacar
Diop, Senegal; Robert M. Dossou, Rep. du Benin; Noel Dossou-
Yovo, Rep. du Benin; Prof. Quince Duncan, Costa Rica; Louise
Edimo, Cameroon; C.M. Eya-Nchama, Equatorial Guinea; Januario
Garcia Filho, Brazil; Eunice Neto Foreid, Portugal; Dianne Forte,
USA; Roderick Francis, Jamaica; Major-General J. N. Garba,
President of the UN General Assembly at the time; Dr. Boutros
Boutros Ghali, (UN Secretary-General at the time); Siegfried
Hazel, Curacao; Malinali Meza Herrera, Mexico; Dr. Byron R. M.
Hove, Zimbabwe; Eddie Iroh, UK; Onwuchekwa Jemie, Nigeria;
Senator Irvin Stephen Knight, Dominica; Pontiff His Grace Srila
Bhakti-Tirtha Swami Krsnapada, USD/USA; Joan Lucas, Belize; Dr.
Joycelynne Loncke, Guyana; Dr. F. L. Lwanyantika Masha,
Tanzania; Kae Matundu-Tjiparuro, Namibia; G. Mawa-Kiese
Mawawa, Grenada; Kinja Mulegwa-Migabo, Zaire; James
Mutambirwa, PCR/WCC; Hon. Bernard Narokobi, Papua-New
Guinea; Abdias do Nascimento, Brazil; Michel Ndoh, Switzerland;
Prof. Anthonio Neto, Angola; Felipe Noguera, Trinidad; T.C. Nwosu,
Nigeria; Frantz Obas, Haiti; Clement O’ Garro, St. Kitts; Prof.
Omolara Ogundipe-Leslie, Nigeria; Placide Prosper, St. Lucia; Dr.
Digna Castaneda Puertas, Cuba; Mtra Araceli Reynoso, Mexico;
Omowale Satterwhite, USA; Mr. and Mrs Savane, Senegal; Bania
Mahamadou Say, Niger; Dr. Jean Sindab, USA; Ghenga Sonuga,
Nigeria; Dr. Laura M. Torres Sounder, Guam; Andre France de
Sousa, Portugal; Hassan A. Sunmonu, OATUU; Cheikh Tidiane Sy,
PANA; Dr. Robert B. Sykes, Australia; Terrel Thomas, Suriname;
Charles Pascal Tolno, Rep. du Guinea; Stewart M. Tsela,
Swaziland; Siteri V. Tuilovoni, Fiji; Prof. Theo Vincent, Nigeria;
Amelia Ventura, Mozambique; Alvin Williams, Bermuda;
Emmanuel York, St. Maarten.
Out of frustration for not finding a suitable host country for
7thPAC, we pursued Uganda, more for President Museveni’ s
gorilla war credentials than for any recognisable record of
achievement in the realm of Pan Africanism. The man would not
even tolerate dissent from within Uganda let alone from outside.
Museveni’s Uganda is in the pockets of the Arabs that are
marginalizing our kith and kin in Northern Africa.
Our first letter to Museveni was in January, 1990 followed by
another in September, 1990 and a third one in June, 1991, inviting
his government to be a possible host of 7thPAC without pre-
conditions. At the end of March, 1991, a number of documents
arrived at our International Secretariat in Lagos from Kwame Ture
stating that Kwame Ture of the All African Peoples Revolutionary
Party (AAPRP), Col. Otafiire, the personal assistant to the Uganda
Head of State and four others had met in Tripoli, Libya on
December 10, 1990 and decided to constitute themselves into a
pre-preparatory committee which is to be enlarged to become the
preparatory committee to convene a conference to create a mass
Pan African organisation.
Among the documents sent was an invitation to Naiwu Osahon to
attend a preparatory meeting of their proposed conference in
March, 1991, in Uganda. Obviously that meeting did not hold
because according to another notice from them later, the
invitations were sent out too late and got to their destinations
well after the March date of the proposed meeting.
Three further attempts were made, up to the 27th of January,
1992, to put their preparatory meeting together without success
but further documents were sent to the International Secretariat
of the 7thPAC in Lagos and addressed as such. The documents
specified that they were putting together:
(a) A conference focusing on anti-Zionism and
(b) To be called ” All African People’s Conference.
Since the title of their conference was not in conflict with our own,
we were not entirely opposed to co-operating with Uganda
although we wrote back to say: “While we are not uncomfortable
with your anti-Zionist focus, we also want anti-Arab and anti-West
focus for your proposed conference.”
On the 7th August, 1991, we received a letter from Col. Otafiire,
calling their group, the 7th Pan African Congress Committee with
Col. Otafiire as convenor and Chairman and President Museveni
as their Patron, thereby constituting a direct challenge to the
International Secretariat of the Pan African Movement in Lagos.
On the 7th August, 1991, we addressed a comprehensive letter of
our objection and discomfort on the matter to President Museveni.
After waiting for a while without response, we wrote on the
subject to all our committees around the world. Several activities
followed around the world after the Uganda bombshell
culminating in a long awaited first ever meeting between me and
Kwame Ture in my office in Lagos on Saturday 27 March, 1993. It
was an extremely warm and inspiring meeting lasting nearly four
hours from about 4.45 p.m. The Secretary General of the 7thPAC
national committee for Nigeria, Dr. Osagie Obayuwana was in
attendance mainly as an observer.
Several issues concerning the way forward were discussed and
the highlights of our agreement were:
(1) That everything humanly possible should be done to keep us
and the black world united. We felt strongly that our detractors
must not be given any comfort on this issue. That we needed to
close ranks and give purposeful direction at this critical point in
our history otherwise posterity would judge us harshly.
(2) That no African government, not even the OAU, under any
disguise, should finance or host the 7th Pan African Congress or
any other Pan African Congress. They can participate at congress
meetings but as equal partners with the rest of the black world.
Congress definitely does not need the authority of the OAU to
hold since the OAU is a child of congress.
(3) That non-black sources should not finance or host any Pan-
African Congress.
(4) That the 7th Pan African Congress should be held in Africa,
preferably in a country where:
(a) Blacks would have no problems obtaining visas to attend,
because no black person, for ideological, religious, or any other
reason should be prevented from attending or speaking his or her
mind freely on any issue as affects the black world at the
congress.
(b) The lives of delegates and others attending congress would be
safe and largely guaranteed.
(5) We did not discuss congress date in details but felt that the
December, 1993 Uganda date might be too soon considering the
enormous task of preparing adequately (especially in area of
fund-raising) for a meaningful congress. The August, 1994 date
proposed by the International Secretariat in Lagos, we felt was
feasible, particularly for the launching of the institutionalised
‘Movement.’
(6) We felt that there was a strong need to ensure qualitative
attendance at congress and agreed that while the mass
movement dimension of congress should not be hindered, it is
necessary for the movement to be led by recognisable Pan-
Africanists. In other words, there is a need to identify and agree
on who serious Pan Africanists are right now, around the black
world, and either split congress dates to accommodate them or
find ways to ensure that congress direction and decisions are
controlled by them. If congress date is to be split, the institutional
dimension of congress could be held first, say in August, 1994, as
already scheduled, followed immediately by the Pan African
leaders congress.
After further consultations on the above issues through
correspondence with Kwame Ture and other blacks of diverse
interests world-wide, it was agreed that the Uganda conference
slated for December, 1993 should be a preparatory one for the
7thPAC of the International Secretariat in Lagos in August, 1994.
The Uganda team ignored our recommendation and announced
that they were going ahead with their December 1993 7thPAC
charade. With US$300,000 blood money from Gaddafi, Museveni
was not only well fortified to play the devil’s advocate, he was
poised to launch his personal ambition to become the Emperor of
a new Tutsi Hema Empire annexing Rwanda and mineral rich
Zaire (now DRC) under the behest of America. We immediately
began circulating a strongly worded message warning the
patriotic black world not to go to Uganda.
On January 3 1994, we received a phone call in Lagos from one of
our deputy leaders, Pauulu Kamarakafego in Bermuda, informing
us that the December, 1993 Uganda make-believe congress failed
to hold. It was cancelled in the last minute because of the non-
arrival of quality delegations. Several ordinary, innocent black
folks from the Diaspora, unaware of the high wire politics being
perpetrated in the name of Pan-Africanism and hoping to touch
base perhaps for the first time in their lives with mother Africa
were turned back at the Kampala airport. A Uganda team, led by
Col. Otafiire then set out on a tour of the black world to deliver
Museveni’s invitation and offers of free return travel tickets and
free accommodation in Uganda to government delegations and
renowned intellectuals who attend their rescheduled April 1994,
7thPAC. They had to move fast to nullify our pending August 1994
7thPAC date. They arrived Nigeria on January 5 1994 to deliver
their invitation to the Nigerian government without visiting the
7thPAC International Secretariat.
And yet, no head of state attended the Uganda 7thPAC debacle.
Not even Nyerere who had received our warning message earlier
on and who was the principal host of the 6thPAC in Tanzania
would grace Uganda with his presence at least to demonstrate
continuity. As predicted, the Uganda exercise turned out to be an
attempt to be a convenor of congress regardless of the outcome
to the black race. A lot of bravado prevailed, loads of resolutions
were passed and delegates were feted lavishly before returning to
their various countries no better off than they were before the
congress. In fact, the average black person in the world today
does not know that the 7thPAC has taken place in his or her
name. Another jamboree has passed, one of the many failed
attempts that litter our chequered history but Uganda achieved ‘a
me too.’ Uganda succeeded in helping us waste another decade,
another generation while Museveni rides on his high visibility
profile to destabilise his neighbouring countries to annex and
exploit their mineral resources.
The Uganda 7thPAC set up a Pan-African office in Kampala as a
propaganda tool of Museveni’s Empire building machinery. That
done, his hit man, Paul Kagame, a CIA protege with US military
school training brought down a plane carrying the Presidents of
Rwanda and Burundi over their countries’ common border with
Uganda. The Presidents’ death launched Rwanda’s sack and
pogrom resulting in the death of over half a million Rwandans and
the displacement of millions of others. Then they replaced the
dreaded Mobutu with Laurent Kabila as President of the DRC.
Kabila, a Lumumbist refused to play along so Uganda, Burundi
and Rwanda occupied the mineral rich regions of the DRC in 1999
with America’s technical backing. They massacred over two and a
half million Congolese while looting and plundering the DRC’s
mineral wealth. But for the meddlesome intervention of the
armies of Angola, Namibia and Zimbabwe, Emperor Museveni was
only a hair’s breath away from his dream of usurping what
potentially would have been the largest and richest modern
Empire in Africa. Surprisingly, the failed Emperor apparently had
the tacit support of South Africa’s President Nelson Mandela who
was waiting on a ship off the coast of Kinshasha to crown Wamba
Dia Wamba as Laurent Kabila’s replacement for Emperor
Museveni’s new surrogate in the DRC.
AFRICAN UNION (AU)
The latest version of the African Union concept started from a
totally discredited non-black source with an OAU’s special
meeting bankrolled by Muamar Gaddafi in Sirte, Libya in 1999.
Gaddafi, as we all know is the rascal or Satan behind all the
modern civil wars in Africa. From Chad to Liberia to Sierra Leone,
Gaddafi had his fingers on the rotten, smellie pie. He financed and
trained Museveni’s gorilla adventure and he is the leading
sustainer of Arab pogrom against Africans in the Sudan right now.
After failing to build his, the United States of the Arab world
dream, he turned to halpless Africa for relevance in international
politics. His interest in the African Union is fiendish and totally
opportunistic and was designed to lead to the setting up of the
AU’s headquarters in Sirte, Libya with Muamar Gaddafi as the
United States of Africa’s first President.
At first, Gaddafi’s dream project was opposed by Presidents
Obasanjo of Nigeria and Thabo Mbeki of South Africa in what may
have been no more than a power struggle between the
personalities involved. President Obasanjo and Abdoulai Wade of
Senegal opposed the Reparations for Slavery and Colonialism
strategy of the black world at the 2001 UN World Conference
against Racism in South Africa. Mbeki, of course, is pocketed by
apartheid architects in South Africa. General Abacha’s regime in
Nigeria, during a moment of discomfort with Mbeki, described
Mbeki’s government as a structure with white skin and black
head. He probably believed the tail wags the head.
During our struggle to assert our 7thPAC variance in the 1990’s,
one of our most formidable foes in Senegal was Abdoulai Wade.
Wade who had strong links with the anti-African ‘Labour
International,’ in collaboration with Pierre T. Sane of Amnesty
International and a Senegalese based in Canada tried to prempty
7thPAC to convene what they called PANAF ‘92 to deliver the
black world on a platter to their French government cohorts.
Wade as the leader of the P.D.S party was reputed for creating
confusion and mayhem in the ranks of opposition political parties
in Senegal before he became the country’s President. His
antecedence is decidedly Western oriented so it was no surprise
that along with Gaddafi, Obasanjo and Mbeki they crafted a
constitution that delivers the AU as a neo-colonial appendage of
the West. These leaders are not Pan-Africanists and do not love
Africa or the black world. They are in all these for selfish personal
gains (crumbs), from under the tables of their Western
benefactors.
NEPAD
The Obasanjo-Mbeki cabal went down on their knees to beg the
West for a $64 billion handout but instead got $6 billion spread
over a period of years. A Pan-Africanist friend, Lester Lewis,
believes that, that is where the NEEEEPAD name comes from.
Obviously, the $6 billion bailout is to enable us continue to buy
the loads of KNEEPADS we are going to need from the West. The
deputy leader of the World Pan African Movement, Charles C.
Roach who is based in Canada, describing the African leaders
begging scene at the 2002 G8 conference in Canada, said: “There
is an amusing photograph of Prime Minister Chretien of Canada
sitting astride a kneeling camel on his recent trip to Algeria and
five other African countries over the NEPAD issue. The Prime
Minister is entreating the camel not to stand up and this is
understandable, because the way a camel gets up, unfolding its
long legs is a roller-coaster ride for anyone on its back.
Symbolically, Chretien was telling the African camel to stay on its
knees while he perches on its back.”
Earlier this year, President Moi of Kenya, said in a speech in
Blantyre, Malawi that Africa was doomed to perpetual poverty and
backwardness unless African leaders free themselves of
egocentricity. That “no country in the West had an obligation to
baby-sit and spoon-feed independent African nations. African
leaders must accept this fact, however unsettling, and rethink
about their development strategies.” Recently too, President
Yahya Jammeh of the Gambia was reported to have described
NEPAD as a charter for beggars. Hear him: “NEPAD would not
work. ….Africa is the richest continent in terms of mineral
resources, but because of ignorance, Africa in economic terms is
the poorest continent and we Africans are the laughing stock of
humanity. We have failed because some of us are agents of the
same people we are supposed to fight against. We produce the
bulk of the world’s raw materials so why are we still poor? Some
of us are fighting proxy wars in Africa for the benefit of others.
Africa has never colonised anyone. Some people who prolonged
apartheid are now waving the flag of democracy and freedom.
The African debt is not globalised, it is Africanised.”
At a forum in Addis Ababa in March 2002, Prof Shadrack Gutto of
South Africa’s University of the Witwaterstrand asked why NEPAD
was presented first to the G8 before African governments had a
chance to discuss it. Mr. Wiseman Nkuhlu, the South African
president’s special adviser on NEPAD, provided the not so wise
answer at the forum that it is because African governments have
been pre-occupied with building the AU. In answer to another
question at the forum, Mr. Nkuhlu admitted that consultation with
civil society “is not where we would like it.”
If the Obasanjo-Mbeki cabal, set up by the West to perpetuate our
developmental pains would not consult with even their colleagues
in African governments before inflicting the culture of the begging
bowl on Africa all over again, does the African civil society have a
right to expect a miracle from the AU? Where does that leave the
black Diaspora in the scheme of things? What about ‘Reparations’
and Repatriation’?
The answer is for African civil society to link up with the black
Diaspora civil society to impose a vibrant, uncompromising
institutionalised ‘ Movement’ on the black world, independent of
African governments’ control. The two priority areas of activities
of the institutionalised ‘Movement’ would be: (a) To pressurise the
AU to produce a Pan-African Passport (PAP) to enable any black or
African, regardless of nationality, return home to Africa at will
without let or hindrance. (b) To compel the West and Arabs, by
any means necessary, to pay Reparations to the black world. This
is, therefore our ‘ CALL’ to all Africans, African organisations,
institutions and NGO’s of goodwill, wherever they may be in the
world, to nominate their representatives to the 8thPAC
International Co-ordinating Committee working to convene the
Eight Pan-African Congress within the next three to five years in
Africa to launch the Institutionalised Pan-African Movement.

ABDULAI KABIRU
(Known world-wide as Prophet Muhammad)
By Naiwu Osahon,
Francois Lenormant in (Histoire Ancienne des Phoenicians)
believes that Arabia is the land of Punt and of the Queen of
Sheba. Punt, in fact, was one of the sons of Ham placed in Arabia
by Biblical tradition. Lenormant says: “A Kushite (Kush is a Jewish
word meaning Black) Empire originally existed throughout Arabia.
This was the epoch personified by the Adites of Ad, grandsons of
Ham, the Biblical ancestor of the Blacks. Cheddade, a son of Ad
and builder of the legendary “Earthly Paradise” mentioned in the
Koran, belongs to the epoch called that of the First Adites.
Around 1550 BCE, the (Kushites) Black original owners and
settlers in the whole of Arabia, suffered their second invasion in
the hands of the barbaric Jectanide (White) tribe that first
temporarily overwhelmed them in 1760 BCE. About this same
time too, Black Babylonians were sacked by Assyrians (Hittites)
another group of primitive White tribes. Initial re-action of the
Kushites to their invasion was to take refuge in the mountains
such as Hadramaut. Some returned to their ancestral home,
Ethiopia, via the Red Sea at Bab el Mandeb. This gave rise to the
Arab proverb: “as divided as the Sabaeans.” Despite the various
invasions by White tribes in Arabia, Ethiopian links with her
Arabian colonies, particularly with Yemen, remained unbroken
until the birth of Muhammad and even so, the Ethiopian language
Ghez remains Yemen’s ancient language even now.
The Kushites were soon able to re-group, fight back and regain
control of their land, Arabia, but absorbing the low class White
tribe settlers in the process. This epoch is known as the second
Adites. This is how Arabs as a people came to be. They are a
mixed breed between Blacks and Whites. All educated Arabs
know that Africans were the first to settle in all of Arabia and that
all Arabs have mixed Black and White blood, including their
fabulous hero, Antar of Arabia and, of course, the prophet
Muhammad. Lokman, the mythical representative of Adite
wisdom in Arabia is considered to be none other than Aesop of
Ethiopian origin. He built the famous dam at Mareb that irrigated
and fertilized the plain over a distance of seven days walk from
the city. The ruins continue to attract tourists until this day.
Prophet Muhammad was not the originator of the Islamic religion.
The Kushite (Ethiopian) kabala, which is soaked in magic and the
knowledge of the stars, (like the Dogon religion in Mali), had set
the tone for the Islamic religion in Persia, 1000 years before the
birth of Muhammad.
In the Persian experience, Cheikh Anta Diop (The African Origin of
Civilization) says: “The only Triad revered was: Venus-Sun-Moon.
The cult had a pronounced sidereal character; especially solar;
they prayed to the sun at different phases of its course. There
was neither idolatry nor images nor priesthood. They addressed a
direct invocation to the seven planets. The 30 days fasting period
already existed, as in Egypt. They prayed seven times each day,
with their faces turned towards the north. These prayers which
take place during the same phases, but which were reduced by
Muhammad later in Islam, to five compulsory prayers to relieve
humanity, the other two prayers are optional.
There were also sacred springs and stones, as in Moslem times;
Zenzen, a sacred spring, Kaaba, a sacred stone. The pilgrimage
to Mecca already existed in imitation of the worshippers of Ausar
who went on yearly pilgrimage to God Ausar’s tomb and sacred
shrines, thousands of years before there was a ‘Wailing Wall’ in
Palestine, or pilgrimage to Mecca and Jerusalem. The Kaaba was
reputed to have been constructed by Ishmael, son of Abraham
and Hagar, the Egyptian (Black woman) historical ancestors of
Muhammad, according to Arab historians, as in Egypt. Belief in a
future life was already prevalent. Dead ancestors were deified.
Thus, all the elements necessary for the blossoming of Islam were
in place more than 1000 years before the birth of Muhammad.”
Abdulai Kabiru, known worldwide as Prophet Muhammad, was
born in 570 CE, ‘the year of the Elephant,’ in Mecca, Arabia (now
Saudi Arabia.) The year of the elephant is important as a marker
because, it was the year Abrahah, the king of Abyssinia, sent an
overwhelming force to Mecca to destroy the Ka’bah, which
Abrahah considered was a distraction to his newly constructed
temple in San’a, in Yemen. Ka’bah served as the unifying
pilgrimage point for all the Arabian tribal cults at the time.
Kabiru’s father, ‘AbdAll’ah died before he was born. His mother,
Aminah, sent him as a baby into the desert to toughen him. She
handed him to a poor woman called Halimah who suckled and
nurtured him. He was still in the desert and six years old when
his mother died.
He was taken to his grandfather, Abd al-Muttalib, when he was 7
years old but the old man also died two years later, so, he was
placed in the care of his uncle, AbuTalib, the father of Ali. Because
of his difficult background, he did not have the opportunity to go
to school. His uncle began to send him out to hawk fetish idols
and masks. He was not very successful in the business because
his unusual sales talks discouraged potential buyers. All his close
family members, including his uncle, AbuTalib, his brothers and
sisters, Aruna, Amina, Sarah, and Abdul-Azeez, were dead before
Muhammad was ten years old. At age 25, he received marriage
proposal from a wealthy Mecca woman, Khadijah bint al-
Khuwaylid, who was 15 years older than him. He accepted the
proposal and the marriage produced two sons who died young,
and four daughters, Zaynab, Ruqayyah, UmmKulthum and
Fatimah. To repay Abu Talib’s kindness, Muhammad took Ali into
his household, and later in life gave Ali his youngest daughter,
Fatimah, in marriage. Fatimah, of all his children had the greatest
impact on history, because Shi’ite imams and Sayyids or Sharifs
are said to have descended from the Fatimah and Ali lineage.
Muhammad was handsome. By the age of 35, he had become a
highly respected figure in Mecca for his wisdom and amiable
personality. He loved retiring into the desert by himself to pray
and meditate. In the month of Ramadan, in 610 CE, at age 40,
during a retreat in the cave called al-Hira, in the Mountain of Light
(Jabal al-Nur) near Mecca, Muhammad, it is claimed, experienced
the presence of Archangel Gabriel. Gabriel in form of a man
asked him to recite (iqra.) Muhammad could not, since he was
unlettered. Gabriel hugged him robustly and asked him two more
times to recite the iqra, hugging him more robustly each time.
Naturally, the strange goings-on scared Muhammad and he fled
the cave, thinking he had become possessed by a jinn or demon.
As he hurried down the mountain from the cave, a voice said:
“Thou art the messenger of God and I am Gabriel.” Muhammad
gazed up and saw the man who had spoken, and he doubled his
speed to get out of the scene. At home, he told his wife his
experience. She called in a blind cousin; a Christian called
Waraqah, who was known to be wise in spiritual ways. Waraqah
confirmed that Muhammad had been chosen as God’s prophet.
Not long after his cave experience, Muhammad received another
revelation accompanied by a bell-like reverberation. Islamic
tradition considers this the beginning process of the revelation of
the Qur’an. It lasted for 23 years until shortly before his death.
He first preached his message to Khadijah, Ali, Zayd ibn al-Harith,
who was like a son to him, then to two close friends, Abdul Ibn
Sefin and Ibn the son of Telfik. This small group became the core
from which Islam grew. Before long, four other people had joined
them, and then came a fifth, the Mazrui, an Ethiopian, who was a
wine seller and who introduced the idea of using his wine guards
as loud speakers to call the faithful to prayers, Alahaa Akuba. In
three years, they were strongly in the public domain. A large
segment of the elite in Mecca rejected his message, because of
its oneness of God base, opposition to idolatory and the fear that
it would destroy commerce accompanying pilgrimage to Mecca to
worship idols kept on the Ka’bah, which was the centre of Arabic
tribal religious cults. The rulers in particular, were not pleased
with Muhammad and exerted pressure on him and his followers to
disband. In 619 CE, two people close to him died, Khadijah, his
friend, counsellor and devoted wife for 25 years, and his uncle
Abi’Talib, who was his protector in the face of powerful hostilities
surrounding him. These deaths, with his lack of success in
propagating his message in Mecca severely tested his
determination and resolve. Although Muhammad by tradition
could have married more wives, he did not until Khadijah died.
In 621 CE, a delegation from Yathrib, a city north of Mecca,
invited him to relocate to their city and become their leader, and
promised him protection. At that time, Yathrib was suffering from
constant tribal skirmishes between their two principal tribes, the
‘Aws and the Khazraj, and a significant Jewish population. From
622 CE, Muhammad’s followers began leaving Mecca for Yathrib
in small groups so as not to arouse suspicion of the authorities,
and to begin to prepare the ground to receive Muhammad. One
evening, he asked Ali to sleep in his bed as decoy, and using an
indirect route, he left for Yathrib. His home was attacked that
night by the Quraysh, looking for Muhammad to kill, on the
excuse of the loud cries summoning the faithful in Mecca and his
threat to destroy the 360 Ka’bah idols. Ali was found in his bed.
On September 25, 622 CE, Muhammad completed the Hijrah
(migration) and reached Yathrib which became known as the City
of the prophet or Medina. This became the starting point of the
Islamic calendar.
Two Ethiopians helped set the Muhammadan faith in motion. One
was the first military man in Islam. He was Muhammad’s teacher
and was regarded as the ‘Lord’ and the ‘Perfect spirit.’ The other
was the Mazrui who called the people to prayers. The Prophet
Muhammad, before his death, said he tried to persuade the ‘Lord’
to be the first Caliph. If the ‘Lord,’ an Ethiopian, had become the
first Caliph, the entire religion would have been different, but
because the Arabs were quarrelling among themselves, he
declined the offer and returned to Ethiopia where he was killed in
the fight with the Byzantium.
In 632 CE, Muhammad made his first Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca,
which remains the model to this day for the millions of Muslims
who make the hajj each year. On his way back from Mecca, he
appointed Ali as the executor of his last will and as his wali, a
term that means friend or saint and also describes a person who
possesses authority. Sunni Muslims take this as family matter
while Shi’tes say it was investiture to succeed the Prophet. By
the time of the Prophet’s death in the spring of June 8, 632 CE, all
of Arabia had become Muslim. There was a bitter succession
battle after Muhammad’s death, between Omar, Abubakir and
Muhammad’s son-in-law Ali, (husband of Muhammad’s daughter,
Fatima.) The kingmakers passed over Ali to appoint Omar as the
new Caliph, but Omar was promptly assassinated. Same fate
befell Abubakir who was chosen to succeed Omar. Civil wars
broke out, leading to the rule of despots. The simple teaching of
Muhammad soon began to yield to earlier evil practices of human
sacrifice and diabolic witchcraft, principally to serve the interests
of the privileged class.
The central tenet of Islam is belief in one God, and confession of
this belief is the first of five “pillars of Islam.” The others are daily
prayers reduced from seven to five times by Muhammad to
temper the stress of praying so many times a day for followers;
giving of alms, pilgrimage to Mecca if possible, and keeping of the
fast in the month of the Ramadan. All of which obviously amount
to a rationalization of the ancient Sabaean (African) religion, by
the Messenger of Allah. African human personification of God in
the Trinity of Osiris, Isis, and Horus, 4,425 years before
Christianity, with Osiris sitting in judgment over the dead,
reinforced the human and masculine attributes of the Christian
God (Yahweh) who created man in His image and likeness. Diop
tells us that, “a visitor to Thebes in the Valley of the Kings in
Egypt can view the Moslem inferno in details (in the tomb of Seti
I, of the Nineteenth Dynasty) 1700 years before the Koran. Osiris
at the tribunal of the dead is indeed the “Lord” of revealed
religions sitting enthroned on Judgment Day. …Judaism, Islam,
and modern science, are rooted in Egyptian (African) cosmogony
and science.”

The physical appearance and claims by the extraterrestrial

spaceship captain, Yahweh, manifesting more or less as human,
settled the issue of who God was for the Christians and to some
extent Muslims, once and for all. Islam adopted the Jewish human
god, Yahweh, and called him Allah, 500 years after Christianity.
Yahweh was the popular reference point at the time, but Islam
had some doubts, so they invested their version of Yahweh with
some peculiar traits, distinct from those of the Christian God.
Islam rejects the idea of a masculine God, and that God could
have a son: “Allah forbid that He Himself should beget a son…….”
Those who say: “The Lord of Mercy has begotten a son, preach a
monstrous falsehood……” (Koran 19:29,88.) Islam also does not
accept the idea of God being a Trinity. “Allah is one and unique
(Koran 5:70.) But the Islamic God is an anthropomorphic deity
who has ears, eyes, mouth, and hears, sees, speaks, knows
things, and sits on the throne, like the Jewish Attribute, Yahweh.
Muslims say their God is merciful, compassionate and forgiving,
however. To test Abraham’s faith, Yahweh asked Abraham to
sacrifice his only son. Convinced of Abraham’s faith, Yahweh
allowed him to substitute a ram. Muslims commemorate this
monumental lack of foresight by ‘God’ yearly with the killing of
rams. The problem for non-believers is why an omniscient God or
Allah has to test followers, to know the truth.
Islam means “bowing to” or “surrendering to” the will of Allah.
Muhammad preached that Allah was the monotheistic One
Source. That “All men of whatever faith who surrender
themselves to the will of Allah are truly children of Islam. Verses
of the Koran on the surface appear innocent enough to serve the
generality of the masses. The esoteric secrets are reserved for
the select few including some learned Alfas. A statement from
the Koran reads:

“To Allah belongeth the east and the west; therefore,

withersoever ye turn yourselves to pray, there is the face of Allah,
for Allah is omnipresent and omniscient.”

Muhammad raged against licentiousness, idolatry and wars,

insisting that the ideal was total devotion to Allah, the One Ruler.
SHANGO IS SUPERIOR TO YAHWEH
By NAIWU OSAHON
There is this lie that alien religions worship only one God. This is
not true. What the Christian and Islamic religions did was pick
Yahweh from the ten Jewish intermediary gods and substitute the
remaining nine: Hokhmah, Binah, Hesed, Gevurah, Tifereth,
Netsah, Hod, Yesod and Malkuth with Jesus, Muhammad, Saints,
Anubis, Angels etc. Yahweh is only one of the ten Jewish
attributes of En-Sof. Yahweh is a tribal deity and claims to hate
Africans (i.e. Amorites, Philistines, Canaanites, Jebusites,
Hittites.) He threatened to wipe us all off the face of the earth for
his children, the Israelites. So, when someone tells you ‘God
bless you,’ be weary and ask which god, which deity? It is
important for all religious people, particularly African Christians
and Muslims, to understand this. Yahweh is a Jewish tribal god
and not the ultimate source of spirituality, which is Tu-SoS or the
Jewish En-Sof.
Tu-SoS or En-Sof is not worshipped anywhere in the world.
Modern Africans, like their ancestors, do not worship Tu-SoS,
which they variously call Olodumare, Osanobua, Chukwu. The
Jews too do not worship En-Sof. The Jews like the Africans,
worship the intermediary Gods. African ancestors created the
entire initial intermediary Gods and Deities known to man.
African intermediary Gods includes Olokun, the Goddess of
beauty, arts, culture, poetry, love, marriage, femininity and
fertility. Orunmila, the God of wisdom, scholarship and learning.
Obatala, the God of creativity, Sango, the God of lightening,
masculinity, fearlessness and hard work, Ogun, the God of Iron,
technology etc.
The secondary intermediary gods or deities, including the Jewish
ones, are mere tribal adaptations of the original African
intermediary Gods and include Thoth, Apollo, Bacchus, Venus,
Jupiter, Hercules, Thor, Asteroth, Adonis, Apis, Mars, Anubis,
Yahweh, Minerva, Diana, Nephthy, Ishtar, Brahman, and all the
other adapted ethnic gods and goddesses with a variety of names
around the world today. They are not as spiritually potent as the
original African spiritual energies from which they were cultured.
If you go to any of the original, undiluted, African spiritual
energies, such as Sango, to make a request, the Deity or Sango,
would give you conditions to fulfil there and then. You would not
have to go home and come back for Sango’s response, and if you
meet the conditions set, Sango would oblige you with your
request. It is as simple as that and it could happen within
minutes of your request.
If, on the other hand, you go to the diluted or adapted spiritual
energies like the Christian and Islamic Yahweh, to table a request,
you don’t get an answer right away. In fact, you could be talking
to a brick wall. You keep praying, begging and fasting, hoping
that someone is listening. A good example of this is the Irish
priest who assembled a dozen barren, middle-aged, married
women and passed six of them on to Baba-maven to use his
witchcraft to alter their faith while he prayed for the other six.
The priest decided the choice of candidates and allocated them.
After six weeks of the experiment, five of Baba’s six candidates
were pregnant for their husbands while the six the priest prayed
and fasted intensely and fervently for, remained barren.
If by any chance something favourable eventually happens,
perhaps months or even years after you first made your request
to Yahweh or the other secondary gods, you give the credit (or
glory as it is often claimed) to Yahweh. But when a tsunami
happens in your life, you blame your sinful self and not Yahweh
for it. Your relationship with Yahweh is based purely on chance,
and that is not how spirituality works. Spirituality can be asked
and even commanded to make things happen although often at a
price.
Apart from being undiluted, African spirituality is more powerful
than the rest because it relies totally on natural elements relevant
and pleasing to the Gods. Artificial substitutes such as bread,
wine, crosses, do not work because they are not natural
elements. The Pope, who claims to represent Christ on earth,
would like to be able to perform miracles (which many African
priests take for granted) if he knew how.

How to engage the Gods.

Praying in the name of any God is not enough. If humans, who do
not live in the same house or the same street or the same town or
country, want to talk to each other, they do not begin to pray or
shout or use loudspeakers in their rooms or churches or mosques
and expect the other to hear them miles away; they use the
telephone. Does it even make sense or show respect that you
should be shouting in the name or presence of your God or Gods,
unless they are deaf? That could be a reason they are not
responding.
Witchcraft is the telephone link with the Gods and the spirit
world. The only link and it is the highest level of science for man.
How to effectively use it to engage the Gods is one of the greatest
secrets of the ages. The secret is kept from most of mankind
because such power could be misused in the wrong hands.
Witchcraft works exactly in the same way as the Internet. When
you type and store or send a document in or from your computer,
powerful cameras of engines such as Google, Yahoo, and Hot-mail
pick up the document to the minutes’ details. Store the document
in giant memory banks, send what needs to be sent to be
accessed from any computer in the world by the identified
beneficiary; analyze, juggle and arrange the information under a
mirage of themes such as name of author, subject matters,
languages and so on, to make the document easily accessible and
functional to a verity of users around the world at the press of the
button. In the same way, every thing we say or do in life is
recorded in a giant spiritual memory bank, the same way the
YouTube records images, MySpace actions and Google stores
documents for Internet use. The gigantic spiritual memory or
data bank can then be accessed with the help of a combination of
natural elements such as leaves, oils, fresh blood, carcasses of
animals, birds etc, coupled with spoken instructions (words), the
potency and weight of which depends on the level of expertise of
the agent, messenger or the medium.
To enter the computer Internet, for instance, we first switch on
the electricity mains, then the computer, then the communication
gadget to engage some special engines (or facilitators) such as
Yahoo, Hotmail, Excel, and Google and so on. These engines are
the energy links to the Gods or deities such as Maat, Sango,
Olokun, Yahweh etc. Surfing on the computer Internet to check
out websites and send e-mails, is the equivalence of praying,
meditating, asking, begging, wishing and crying. The practical
activities of getting on, sending and receiving messages on the
Internet, equate with witchcraft. Witchcraft is the Spiritual
Internet link and information and action processing catalyst of
human interaction with the Gods.
To engage a God to respond to you, you must do a number of
things pleasing to the God. These are secrets kept from most of
mankind because such power could be misused in the wrong
hands. Praying in the name of any God is not enough. You must
first knock and receive the response to enter the realm of the God
before making your requests in form of prayers or crying, (these
are all witchcraft.)
The Holy Communion is criminal witchcraft cannibalism but the
Church fathers want us to think otherwise. All these are the
surface programmes, much else go on behind the curtains with
incantations, incenses, candles etc. Abraham sacrificed a ram to
spare his son’s life but human sacrifices are not sacrosanct to the
Gods. Yahweh supports human sacrifice. (Ex.22: 29 – 30.)
Yahweh revels in blood sacrifices including human, and in
elaborate, archaic rituals. Yahweh killed (Num.16: 35, 21:6; Deut.
32:39; 1Sam. 2: 26; Psalm 135: 10. Yahweh ordered killing
(Lev.26: 7 –8: Num. 25; 4-5.)
The spirit world is enveloped in electromagnetism that connects
with our spirit doubles and all other realities. Universal laws
govern the realities and man is capable of transcending all of
them. That is what spiritual evolution is about. It is the knowledge
of these subtle realities and how to harness them for spiritual
advancement that ancient Africans chiselled into the fine art used
largely today by the Jews and secret societies.

Entry into a physical body from the invisible world is birth. Death
is to return to the subtle world from the physical body. In
whatever state man finds himself, he is a spirit in evolution.
Mental awake-ness or the knowing process never stops. It does
not stop after death but becomes more subtle and free to
traverse the cosmos. Spirit takes on subtle and physical forms to
continue the learning process. It is possible to pass from waking
consciousness into the spirit, mental or astral states and return.
When awake our mind or sensory equipment provides the
thoughts and in sleep, soul or consciousness breaks into two with
the subtler part journeying through the spiritual, mental and
starry worlds while the other remains behind to nurse the mind
and physical body. The two parts of consciousness reunite when
we wake up. Some Clairvoyants can see the point of separation
and reunification.
Our ancestors taught that spiritual development or progress is
possible in degrees through disciplined intellect, adoption of
ethical principles and balance in ones life. That one needs to
allow disciplined subtle forces to dominate ones physical
essence. The secret knowledge the adepts taught was about the
mastery of these subtle forces progressively to achieve higher
consciousness. Initiates, through purity of thoughts and actions,
meditation, service to humanity and spiritual discipline became
perfect in the act. Tu-SoS then fully occupied their forms
individually for their astral journeys to the cosmic destination.

One of the greatest secrets of the ages.

The most highly kept secret of the ages by mankind is how to
acquire the power of the spirits and the forces. The system is
called alchemy and it was created by an African teacher
described by ancient Africans as the “Thrice Greatest:” the
greatest of all philosophers, the greatest of all priests, the
greatest of all kings. His African names included: “Thoth,”
“Tehuti,” and “Theuth.” The West knows him as “Hermes
Trismegistus.”
He was the world’s first “Adept” or “Master.” The system of
alchemy is the only known way of spiritual development, and is
through the transmutation of the spirit. The Book of Thoth,
written in hieroglyphic symbols, provides the key to the mysteries
and how to acquire power of the spirits and other forces. Thoth,
the father of alchemy, taught that everything (animal or
vegetable) is composed of one common element or matter. That
the motivating principle or active agent of matter in the
evolutionary process is spirit. That this active agent or spirit
could be released to achieve transmutation. That transmutation
or the ripening of matter is a common phenomenon to all things,
leading ultimately to perfection of prime matter in all things, in
unity with the kingdom and purpose of Tu-SoS.

That the ripening process could be speeded up through the

imitation of nature in the laboratory. That when the perfect metal
of nature is achieved, a perfect philosophic (body) gold, or
receptacle is required to contain the released spirit. That this
done, further transmutations are possible through the agency of
the philosophic gold or the philosopher’s stone, and the rigorous
imitation of nature.
Every living thing is composed of the four elements (Fire, Water,
Air, and Earth) in unison. Each element in turn consists of two
qualities as follows: Fire (dryness and heat) Water (moistness and
coldness) Air (heat and moistness) Earth (moistness and
dryness.) An element may change into another by substituting
one quality for another. For example, if coldness is replaced with
heat in water, it changes into air (vapour.)
In the same way, transmutation is possible in the human stone
through images symbolic of death such as torturing, killing,
separating etc. Prime matter is possible only by the reduction of
each element to its essence and combined with other refined
elements to reach the chaotic state of original matter i.e.,
Genesis. This seed of things could then be treated in a warm
vessel or womb of resurrection of what had been killed.
By freeing and purifying ones own spirit, a reciprocal event occurs
in nature, but this could not be done without first creating the
philosopher’s stone. This is the fifth element, which is the Prime
matter of the world, the Fiat, which is the Word, the pneumatic
Logos, the Spirit of Tu-SoS. Tu-SoS and Man cannot be united
except through a perfect medium of body. There are twelve
stages in the alchemic work; each symbolized by a house of
zodiac. Before embarking on the process, one must first bring
order into his life. You must be a perfectly virtuous being,
thinking no evil and doing no evil, to be able to achieve the
benefits of the process.
Nigredo symbolizes the death stage. This is the stage when
matter being worked on is killed and when basic form is broken
down to free the spirit contained in it. This usually is the most
difficult aspect of the alchemist’s work. Alchemists describe this
stage as a descent into hell, a period of great doubts when the
subject could go mad and even also commit suicide. Very few
people go beyond this stage and no one has a blue print on how
to survive it. All anyone can hope for is to resort to prayers and
leave everything in the hands of Tu-SoS. This stage is symbolized
by torture, amputation, dissolution, and calcinations by burning
waters, decapitation, wounding, flaying, drowning, starvation,
separation and grinding. To achieve all these, one must be
separated completely from material comfort, be alone even in a
crowd, helpless, hopeless, deprived and starved silly.
The Albedo is often referred to as the dawn state. This is the
stage when one is stepping out of the darkness of nigredo. A
time of washing, cleansing of the impurities. The stage
represents transition from base lead to silver and is often
represented by a feminine figure such as the moon or nature. It
is associated with the symbol of rebirth. While nigredo represents
a moment of spiritual death, albedo represents a moment of
baptism but the sun has not yet made an appearance. The
Rubedo is the period of totally new awareness. This stage is
marked by symbols of royalty and domination signalling the birth
of the philosopher’s stone. Alchemy, a divine art has been laced
with severe secrecy from day one. Thoth taught the art mainly to
the sons of kings.
Thoth’s alchemy produced the long stream of African leaders,
seers, priests, who pioneered learning and civilization for
mankind. The science is in modern times associated with magic,
astrology and chemistry. Francis Bacon believed in the
philosopher’s stone, which could turn base matter into gold, and
in an elixir of life, to give eternal youth. Modern researches into
radioactivity confirm the possibility of transmutation of certain
elements.
To permanently conceal African contributions, the art was labelled
Paganism by the elite who stole the science to control the world.
They have benefited immensely from it over the years particularly
through the secret societies that now collectively monopolize
aspects of the original techniques. They called it paganism to
discourage mass involvement and secretly usurp the secret to
ensure their permanent stranglehold on the rest of humanity and
particularly the authors.
All humans pray to their ancestors, not ‘God.’ All spirits can
hurt or help the living, some more so than others. The more
spiritually gifted ones are turned to Gods by the living seeking
their intervention. When we pray, it is to our guardian spirits, the
spirits that know us individually and care about us, such as of our
dead parents, husbands, wives, siblings, children and close
relatives that we pour out our hearts, without knowing that this is
what we are doing. They are the only ones, whose listening
devices or antennae are permanently tuned to us individually,
and whose acute undivided attention, is forever fixed on us. They
are the only ones who take our prayers to heart because they
know us intimately and care. They are the ones who try to help
as best as possible, despite difficult physical barriers and
constraints.
They are the only ones who come, and can come quickly to our
aid, because they have a stake in our welfare and well-being. In
some cases, they act out of guilt feeling of having left us abruptly,
or so soon before fulfilling certain obligations and commitments
owed us. Spirits cannot put money in our hands physically while
we are awake, but can do it symbolically in dreams, or bring us
luck in business, or introduce us to someone to help us in our
endeavours.
Modern religions, as against spirituality, discourage us from giving
credit to whom credit is due because religion is a gigantic money
spinning industry requiring crowds of dedicated, selfless, helpless,
followers, paying tithes and providing finances to the exclusive
benefit of a select elite. The leaders brainwash us into giving with
unquestioning loyalty and submission, and to credit their Gods
solely with all our good fortunes, and blame ours or the devil
exclusively for all our misfortunes. But all Gods are man-made,
and since all the Gods and spirits in the universe cannot solve all
of mankind’s problems that keep increasing daily, all at once,
spirits start by first taking care of their own, naturally.
The sub-races say that their African parents or ancestors are
inferior. That Africans do not count, are not humans, and Africans
themselves have largely surrendered their fate to their unending,
relentless bashing by the racist world. We have almost all
mentally stopped being Black and African.
If the Jews and the secret societies can lead the world with less
than half our spiritual strength, we can restore civilization to its
wholesome, profound path of growth terminated 2000 years ago,
by unleashing our full spiritual power for the good of all mankind.
We must return to our ancestors first, however. We are the ones
who can walk on water; send thunder on errand anywhere and
visit heaven at will, and if we stop our evil ways and our
bitterness against one another, no one and nothing can stop us
reaching beyond the stars.

SPOT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

ISLAM, CHRISTIANITY AND PAGANISM
By NAIWU OSAHON
There is too much religion in the developing world right now, too
much pre-occupation with spiritually false and ineffective money
spinning religious enterprises of con-artists, especially in the
hapless African world of abject poverty and ignorance; resulting in
the colossal loss or waste of precious and productive energy and
time that all of mankind could have jointly harnessed to move
civilization significantly forward.
We spend the better part of the day and several vigil nights
weekly, on our knees or butts praying endlessly and tirelessly to
no avail because that is not how spirituality works. We are the
most wretched people on earth. Our society is riddled with
unmitigating violence; entrenching culture of dare-devil robbery
and filthy and shameless corruption; dearth of basic infrastructure
and degrading, decaying, primitive unnurturing, unfulfilling
environment, because we are applying spirituality wrongly and we
are not using our heads. We are wasting too much time on our
knees instead of on our feet to work.
All organized religions deceive followers that witchcraft is all evil
but the elite of these religions are soaked in the practice. It is
impossible to engage the Gods without some formalities that
involve abstinence, meditation, fasting and ritual sacrifices.
Sacrifices are paramount and sometimes include blood of some
sort and so on. Christ was supposed to have sacrificed his blood
for mankind so his devotees make a meal of his flesh and blood
with bread and wine in communion.
Another lie by modern religions is their claim to worship only one
God. What the Christian and Islamic religions did was to pick
Yahweh from the ten Jewish intermediary gods and substitute the
remaining nine: Hokhmah, Binah, Hesed, Gevurah, Tifereth,
Netsah, Hod, Yesod and Malkuth with Jesus, Muhammad, dozens
of Saints, Anubis, and Angels etc.
Yahweh is only one of the ten Jewish attributes of En-Sod. Yahweh
is a tribal deity and claims to hate Africans and others (i.e.
Amorites, Philistines, Canaanites, Jebusites, and Hittites). He
threatened to wipe all of us off the face of the earth for his
children, the Israelites. So, when someone tells you ‘God bless
you,’ be weary and ask which God, which deity? It is important for
all religious people, particularly African Christians and Muslims, to
understand this. Yahweh is a Jewish tribal god and not the
ultimate source of spirituality, which is Tu-SoS or the Jewish En-
Sof.
Tu-SoS (The ultimate Source of Spirituality), or En-Sof (in
Judaism), is not a God or spirit but an energy source and is not
worshipped anywhere in the world. Modern Africans, like their
ancestors, do not worship Tu-SoS, which they variously call
Olodumare, Osanobua, Chukwu. The Jews too do not worship En-
Sof. The Jews, like the Africans, worship the intermediary Gods.
African ancestors created all the initial intermediary Gods and
Deities known to man. African ancient intermediary Gods include
El, Thoth, Auser, Auset, Heru, Maat, Anubis etc., and in modern
times, names such as Sango, the God of lightening, masculinity,
fearlessness and hard work; Olokun, the Goddess of beauty, arts,
culture, poetry, love, marriage, femininity and fertility; Orunmila,
the God of wisdom, scholarship and learning; Obatala, the God of
creativity and Ogun, the God of Iron and technology.
The secondary intermediary gods or deities include Yahweh and
the other Jewish adaptations of the original African intermediary
Gods, and the ethnic gods and goddesses with a variety of names
around the world today: Apollo, Venus, Jupiter, Adonis, Minerva,
Diana, Brahman etc.
The adapted gods and goddesses are not as spiritually potent as
the original African spiritual Gods. If you go to any of the original,
undiluted, African spiritual Gods, such as Sango, to make a
request, the deity or Sango, would give you conditions to fulfill
there and then. You would not have to go home and come back
for Sango’s response, and if you meet the conditions set, Sango
would oblige you with your request. It is as simple as that and it
could happen within minutes of your request. If, on the other
hand, you go to the diluted or adapted spiritual Gods like the
Christian and Islamic Yahweh, to table a request, you don’t get an
answer right away. In fact, you could be talking to a brick wall.
You keep praying, begging, and fasting, hoping that someone is
listening.
A good example of this is the Irish priest who assembled a dozen
barren, middle-aged, married women and passed six of them on
to Baba-maven to use his witchcraft to alter their faith while he
prayed for the other six. The priest decided the choice of
candidates and allocated them. After six weeks of the
experiment, five of Baba’s six candidates were pregnant for their
husbands while the six the priest prayed and fasted intensely and
fervently for, remained barren. If by any chance something
favourable eventually happens, perhaps months or even years
after you first made your request to Yahweh or the other
secondary gods, you give the credit (or glory as it is often
claimed), to Yahweh. But when a tsunami happens in your life,
you blame your sinful self or the devil and not Yahweh for it. Your
relationship with Yahweh is based purely on chance, and that is
not how spirituality works. Spirituality can be asked and even
commanded to make things happen although often at a price.
The Mother-in-Israel, Pastor Folu Adeboye, wife of the founder and
Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, in admitting
the supremacy of Paganism, was quoted in the Guardian
newspaper, Nigeria, of July 26, 2009, as follows: “As powerful as
African Juju priests are, none of them possess the power to keep
the night and stop the morning from coming.” But Paganism is
not in competition with the ‘Source’ of spirituality; it is the only
access to the ‘Source,’ or ‘God.’ Paganism can becloud the early
morning sun to make the night drag longer but cannot stop
‘time.’ God’ cannot stop time either.
The bad connotation given to the witch or witches, gives
witchcraft its ugly meaning because witches are not necessarily
all evil people. They could be white witches or geniuses in any
given profession. It is the sorcerers or red and black witches and
the demon diviner/doctors that are always evil, and they
unfortunately predominate in evil witchcraft.
Witchcraft incorporates all spiritual and religious activities
including praying, telepathy, meditation, magic, clairvoyance,
fasting, rituals and sacrifices. Priests, doctors, parapsychologists,
traditional healers, diviners, magicians, astrologists, card readers,
star gazers, palmists, heruspex practitioners, alchemists, Alfas,
herbalists etc., are not necessarily all sorcerers or sorceresses,
but could be experts or good witches and wizards in their various
fields and practices.
Witches are graded by colour, with white representing good
witches and would never do evil; the red and black witches in all
races are the wicked ones. They are the sorcerers, possessed by
demonic spirits which they use to perpetrate their evil acts. They
have no regards for family, friends and have no respectable,
responsible attachments. They are invariably sadists,
permanently angry, vindictive and at war with every one, and
with society. Their sole preoccupation in life is to kill, maim and
destroy, and from these they derive immense joy, satisfaction,
and self-fulfilment.
So, they deserve the public odium they have drawn to
themselves. At the same time, the rest of us need to know that it
is not witchcraft that is evil but the person (or witch) using it, or
the use to which it is put. Witchcraft is like a knife and depends
on the user. It is the highest level of science possible; human’s
only link with the spirit world; the sacred telephone link with all
the Gods; the one single source of spiritual power and miracles,
and it has not been fully explored positively by man. All religions
practice it albeit artificially, with varying results.
We, therefore, have no reason to be so categorically dismissive or
judgmental about witchcraft. We do not know enough about it yet
anyway. Most of us do not know why or how it works, and it
works for both good and evil, there is no doubt about that, and we
are all involved in it through prayers, wishing, thanksgiving and
self-sacrifices, at least. When we use it for good, we do not tell
others about it but when it is used for evil against us, we scream
to the high heavens.
Witchcraft, evil or not, is not peculiar to Africa. It is more
secretive outside it that is all. It is practiced all over the world
even by heads of states who regularly consult diviners before
taking any action. President Ronald Reagan of America was
known to regularly consult a soothsayer every morning before
confronting decisions of the day. The husband of Britain’s one
time Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was known to be a
leading member of the secret cult called the Smiths that to all
intents and purposes rules Britain today. Many workers on the
London Bridge died during its construction until the spirit of the
body of water around the bridge was pacified. Every August since
then, an elaborate ritual incorporating human sacrifice is secretly
performed by a British cult group from a dead ship anchored at
the mouth of the bridge.
Covens of witches are still very active all over the world. In 1944,
during the allied armies’ invasion of Europe, a Mrs. Helen Duncan,
described as a spiritual medium, was sent to prison in Britain for
activities connected with witchcraft. The prosecution drew caustic
remarks from Winston Churchill, the British Prime Minister at the
time. The British Witchcraft Act was finally repealed in the 1950s.
Children’s dolls today are the images of fallen ancient gods and
nursery rhymes are laced with the sorcerers’ spell to induce calm
and sleep. Cicero wrote a book on divination, which highlighted
the significance of dreams, premonitions and the flight of birds as
illustrating the purpose of the gods.
A married German couple, Daniel Ruda and wife, showed no
remorse when convicted in a German court in early January 2002,
for the murder of their neighbour and friend, to perform a weird
witchcraft ritual of a cult they belonged to.
The six and seven books of Moses are about simplified aspects of
witchcraft in Kabbalism. The Israeli Seven-day war was won with
severe witchcraft. The Rabbis kept busy, they called it divine
luck. The Arabs suddenly stopped advancing, on the verge of
overrunning Israel ten men to one, and with far superior weapons
and conquered grounds. The breather provided the scared Jews
the opportunity to infiltrate behind enemy lines in peach darkness
to plant bombs.
In fact, current societal progress and civilization would have been
impossible without esoteric witchcraft because spirits often
sensitize scholars to what to do and science and technology are
the rudimentary stages of divine witchcraft. Modern
communications utilize electromagnetism, as does witchcraft.
Tapping into radio waves is witchcraft. Sending crafts to the
Moon in defiance of gravity is witchcraft.
All Chemists perform witchcraft by mixing chemicals (the same
way witches mix their brews), to induce certain results including
healing. Essentially, magic is an aspect of witchcraft but modern
man tries to distinguish between entertainment witchcraft, which
is called magic, and commercial (evil) witchcraft, which they
ignorantly think is the same as divine witchcraft. When witchcraft
generally is carried out by rainmakers, shamans, diviners and
witch doctors today we frown but when priests, Alfas and
scientists do the same thing we hail them as divine.
The elite of modern religions do not see or call what they do
witchcraft. It is God’s miracles, they say. Great crimes are being
committed in the name of God in mosques and conventional
churches. Imams and Pastors take advantage of the spiritual
naiveté of their followers to intimidate and suppress them to
collect tithes. There is the handkerchief racket you buy to wipe
away your sins or the give me 40% of what you have and the Lord
would multiply your fortune a hundred fold, preacher-swindlers.
Tools of criminal activities are being blessed by some pastors at a
price and Churches and Mosques often serve as sanctuaries for
society’s miscreants.
Witchcraft in Islam
African Muslim clerics are more potent than their Arab
counterparts because of the superior African spiritual power. A
group of Islamic scholars I told that religion without witchcraft was
no religion told me how their Alfa died when his home was
bombed by a rival religious sect. Their deputy Alfa had to fortify
himself with base witchcraft. It is normal or do I want him to be
killed like a chicken, they asked? When the well-loved Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,
Chief Bola Ige, was assassinated on December 23, 2001, the
question on the lips of many Christian and Muslim Nigerians was
why he did not reinforce police security with witchcraft from his
village, Esa Oke?

There are blood cuddling stories of dictators who took their bath
with human blood regularly to ensure their permanent hold on
power. Nigeria had, at least, two of such leaders of military
extraction, who were of the Islamic faith. Since such leaders still
lose power after a while or are killed in the process, the spiritual
gifts garnered through the blood sacrifices would tend to be
transient at best. In any case, there is always a price to pay for
evil gifts, ranging from early death of the seeker, to the loss of life
of a dear one or impotency etc.
Witchcraft was planted on the land of a chap I knew. The idea
being to scare him off his land or kill him. His staff, who did not
believe in such things, dug up the contraption and threw it into a
near-by bush. That evening, his right hand began to swell
painfully and before long he was feeling like he was going to have
a partial stroke on the left hand side of his body. The Imam
invited to his rescue copied some verses from the Koran, and
washed the writing into a cup for the patient to drink. Slowly,
over a couple of days of continuing to drink the concoction, the
swelling began to subside. But to permanently disconnect the
witchcraft, which included cowries mounted on a piece of wood, a
cock and a hen were sacrificed by the Imam who used the blood
along with other objects and heavy incantations from the Koran.
Obviously, some electromagnetic force had to be battled in the
fierce encounter to release the patient from the grip of the
witchcraft contraption.
I stumbled on an elaborate witchcraft ritual one early morning in
the compound of a Lebanese Muslim neighbour in Apapa, Lagos,
Nigeria. Alfas, Imams and family members of the Lebanese were
involved in the apparently solemn event that included the
skinning of a sheep alive. I retreated quickly because the faces of
the participants in the event did not suggest that visitors were
welcomed.
A few days later, the Lebanese neighbour had the opportunity to
explain to me that the skinned sheep was buried alive in the
compound and that it was a part of an Islamic ceremony to invite
good fortunes. He said other versions of the rituals could include
writing the messages (requests), on the body of the skinned
sheep in what is called Hantu (i.e. special ink), with Kalam (special
biro), before burying it alive.
Tabati Ada is a potent witchcraft ritual not fully spelt out in the
Koran for obvious reasons. It involves the summoning of the
relevant ‘Spirit’ at mid night with the blood of a black goat and
peering into the sun the following noon day with naked eyes to
demand specific favours. Of course, the entire ceremony is more
elaborate than this, laced with an almost endless monologue of
spoken Koran verses relevant to the purpose.
Every Muslim knows about Ya’si involving a number of brothers
moving into the home of the fortune seeker to pray 1600 times
each day and night, usually for seven days and nights at a time,
using appropriate Koran verses. Politicians rely on it for winning
elections. Women swear by it to capture spouses. Business
people use it to trap untrammelled wealth and many swear it
works especially when wrapped in raw witchcraft. Ya’si is in the
water or wrap, under the wings of the cock by the water, and the
smouldering fire in a shallow bowl-size well in the public room.
The cock crows every morning to wake up the fortune seeker until
the seventh day when it enters the fire of hell guaranteeing
success. The fortune seeker might be required to ride a female
donkey to a market place at past midnight to be intimate with the
donkey, pull out on the verge of release, and collect his sperm for
the final rituals.
Christian Witchcraft.
For example, the Holy Communion with wine and bread
representing the blood and flesh of Jesus respectively is criminal
witchcraft cannibalism, but the Church faithful prefer to deceive
themselves. All these are the surface programmes, much else go
on behind the curtains with incantations, incenses, candles etc.
Abraham sacrificed a ram to spare his son’s life but human
sacrifices are not sacrosanct to the Gods. Yahweh supports
human sacrifice. (Ex.22: 29 – 30).
Yahweh revels in blood sacrifices including human, and in
elaborate, archaic rituals. Yahweh killed (Num.16: 35, 21:6; Deut.
32:39; 1Sam. 2: 26; Psalm 135: 10. Yahweh ordered killing
(Lev.26: 7 –8: Num. 25; 4-5). The daylight human sacrifice of
Luciano (Catholics prefer to call it the ‘miracle’ of fresh human
flesh and blood), proves the true nature of the Communion host –
the Eucharist.
All modern Churches: the Protestants, the Apostolic Faith, the
Church Missionary Society, the Celestial Church of Christ, the
Roman Catholic Church, the Cherubim and Seraphim, the Qua-
Iboh sects and the Pentecostal variances, to name a few, are
involved in serious witchcraft called miracles. The priests heal
with magic words and herbal mixes passed on as holy water or
the blood of Jesus. Bread replaces human flesh, and wine blood,
obviously to get high and speak in tongues.
In most Christian sects, licentiousness has been developed to an
art. Women looking for pregnancies are taken by priests of some
of the sects to lonely beaches at night or in the early morning
hours and fingered mercilessly in the guise of allowing the holy
spirit to enter into them, before being raped singing Alleluia to
every bang, heightened with the mention of the name Jesus.
Another version is called ‘Abe Abo’ for protection, which literally
means to sleep under the priest for 3 to 7 days at a stretch. This
goes on all the time in Celestial churches for instance. A married
woman desperate for a child is given some liquid concoction to
rob on any penis (but her husband’s), before sex, to get
pregnant. The pastor would pretend he is not interested in the
act so as to be begged by the woman to oblige there and then. It
is decreed by Jesus, the one and only Son of God.

Pentecostalism is the latest vogue in town. The prophets, pastors

or priests rely on witchcraft for their magic and pass these off as
miracles even on television. Their greatest con is reserved for
healing, stage managed with paid people posing to have been
cured of some ailments in the spirit of Jesus. I saw a man who
appeared on two healing programmes of two entirely different
Churches on the same Sunday. He was on an early morning
television show claiming to have been cured of spinal cord
problems. Six hours later he was on another television show with
a different Church, removing his braces to prove his miraculous
cure, after being pushed to the ground by the priest stretching his
right hand in the fake patient’s direction.
Ailments caused by emotional problems can be cured
psychologically, especially through counselling. None spiritual
ailments respond to orthodox medicine and spiritually caused
ailments are cured only spiritually. In reality, there are no miracle
cures. All ailments are caused (a) through physical means such
as by germs, wounds, defective organs etc., which can sometimes
be treated with orthodox medicine or herbs, or caused by (b)
spiritual means, with the attacking spirit or spirits attaching to our
bodies to perpetuate the ailment, or the ailment sent by remote
control through the wind, powered by electromagnetism.
Spiritually caused ailments copy physically caused ailments in
intensity and details and range through all forms of ailments from
headaches to cancer to AIDS. All spiritual treatments use other
spirits (deities) to detach the spirit/s attacking or to cut off the
remotely controlled electromagnetic link. Spiritual healing
happens immediately following the detachment of the attacking
spirit that is why it seems to be like a miracle. Miracle cures in
Churches, therefore, affect only spiritual ailments and intense
prayers are not enough, severe witchcraft quietly summoning a
spiritual deity or deities for intervention, is involved.
The miracle priests and pastors are dishonest about their sources
of power. They pretend in public to be tapping their energy from
the Bible or Jesus while in the privacy of their homes they are
involved in diabolical witchcraft to sustain the power. No miracle
is possible without witchcraft. As we are misled in believing, when
‘Spirit’ kills, devil takes the blame. When ‘Spirit’ gives good
health, wealth, children and long life, God takes the glory. God is
society’s convenient and acceptable alibi.
The first activity of a Pentecostal church pastor is to learn magic
and witchcraft. All the big names, Adeboye, Joshua etc are not
ignorant about this. A leading Lagos pastor working miracles
currently received his spiritual energy from a well-known powerful
witch doctor. Six pigs are sacrificed yearly at a Pentecostal
leader’s Ifa shrine in Ijebu Ode, Nigeria. Because they are not
honest about their sources of power, their spiritual gifts tend to
be transient and a great price is paid in private to sustain the
deceit for any length of time.

The second activity of the Pentecostal priest is to employ a

standby witch doctor far more potent in the craft than he is, to
continue to guide him. Then he dreams up grand names like: the
Mission of God Incorporated or the Fire on the Mountain Mission
or the Angels of God Caravan etc. Before building his church
premises, his witch doctor must ritually bury any number of live
cows from a dozen to a hundred, depending on means, in the
foundation of the building. The intention being that the thousands
of maggots that would invade the carcasses of the dead animals
would translate into the crowd of worshippers the new church
would attract and they do translate into such a crowd.
A pastor told me recently that when he prays after 12 mid night,
especially when he begins to call on the Holy Ghost to exorcise
the demons around him, he experiences serious body vibrations
and his room begins to spin around him until he gives up and
goes to sleep. A German preacher, Evangelist Reinhard Bonnke,
who visits Africa several times yearly, admitted the other day that
he comes to Africa regularly to spiritually re-charge and that
Africans do not know the high level of spiritual power they are
blessed with. Nigerian Prophet T.B. Joshua is the leading Christian
priest in the world right now because he is African.
There are traces of invisible use of power and methods of spiritual
development as symbolized by rituals, gestures and thoughts,
which are still practiced in the Church today, which the Church
fathers hope followers would not try to understand.
During the Xmas holidays of 1999, Pope John Paul II had cause to
go through a once in fifty years’ witchcraft ritual. There is a room
at the Golden Gate of St. Paul’s Basilica at the Vatican, which is
opened only briefly once every Jubilee year by the reigning Pope.
The room contains relics, including skeletons and bones of special
ancestors, such as of the African original God Ausar (Osiris), wife
Auset (Isis) and Virgin Son Horus. Also in the room are fetish
symbols like ancient crosses, urns and regalias etc.
Pope John Paul II was seen by television viewers worldwide
knocking on the door to the room three times (like Ifa priests do
before entering their shrines), before entering the room alone and
closing the door behind him, obviously to try to collect mysterious
powers from the skeletons, bones and artefacts in the room. He
emerged from the room a few minutes later, with the door locked
firmly for another fifty years.
What is witchcraft but the worship of fetish objects and idols?
Africans serve many Gods by offering sacrifices and prayers
through such intermediaries, but what are Christians doing when
they say Mass through a plethora of subordinate deities such as:
St. Michael, St. Peter, St. Paul, St. Jude, the Archangel, and the
Virgin Mary, Jesus Christ etc? Christians say they do not believe in
ancestors, but what are their dead Saints and Jesus to them?
Christians say they do not believe in reincarnation, but they are
waiting endlessly for the return of their ancestor, Jesus.
In the Catholic Church for instance, the process of recognizing a
saint has not changed since the 16th century. The first step,
beatification, requires at least one confirmed miracle.
Canonization, the final declaration of sainthood requires at least
one more. The Canadian medical historian, Dr. Jacalyn Duffin, put
the study of miracles in the Catholic Church under her microscope
for years and found that out of the 1,400 individual saint-making
miracles; more than 500 were validated in the 20th century. The
most recent miracle healing on her list took place in 1995. Duffin,
a physician, claimed that supplicants walked away from
seemingly incurable diseases, ranging from the suppurating
wounds and raging tuberculosis of the pre-antibiotic era to
today’s diagnoses of metastatic cancer. What the church and
Duffin are calling miracles is the spirit of the saint or others acting
on being summoned spiritually to detach the spirit causing the
dire illness.
Christians wear medals, crosses, crucifixes, rosaries and other
objects of their religion as pendants; eat the flesh and drink the
blood of Jesus in Holy Communion; wrap psalms in pouches or
scapular charms, made from pieces of cloth, to carry about on
their bodies or in their vehicles as talisman; sprinkle blood of
Jesus all over the place or bathe with it to ward off evil forces; put
bibles under their pillows and crosses on their walls for protection;
kneel before priests and fetishly stuffed alters in supplication;
retreat regularly for vigils to pray and chant endlessly clutching
rosaries, pendants, and other religious symbols to their ancestors
(saints, Jesus, Yahweh etc); go on pilgrimages to their holy lands
to touch and kiss stones, walls, or worship rivers and mountains.
When African traditional faith followers, such as Sango and
Amadioha adherents, do these same things for their deities, the
Africans are described as being fetish. Both are into base
witchcraft rituals, the only difference is that while one relies on
artificial or man made objects (such as bread, wine and rosaries),
the other remains faithful to natural elements, and we all know
who is more potent.
African Mavens and Divine Witchcraft
Witchcraft at the divine or arcane level is the ultimate for spiritual
communication and requires minimal ceremonies. The potency of
genuine African witchcraft at the cryptic level is not in doubt. Not
everyone that claims to be able to divine whether with urim and
tumim or what ever else can deliver. Because African Gods are
very potent, charlatans cash in to exploit the innocent.
There are seven grades of diviners in African faiths. Most rank
and file lowest grade diviners, along with all impostors, operate at
the mundane level, causing untold pain and suffering by their
bungling, to put their clients’ lives on a roller-coaster chance of
hit and miss. The highest grades of diviners, from top down in
Yoruba pantheon are Aroles, Oluwos, Apenas and Akapos. A few
of them, along with African white witches, are mavens who know
their onions. They usually operate at the esoteric level, which is
the highest level of spirituality reserved for the gods. They tend to
be aged and not educated in the modern sense, but they are
wiser than acknowledged university professors.
There is nothing the mavens cannot do. Absolutely nothing. They
experiment with animal and mineral magnetism, the Lodestone
and the forces of psychological impressions. They can read the in-
most secrets of the soul and send their own spiritual forces out
from the body. They are masters of mesmerism, clairvoyance and
electro biology. They use herbs and drugs, employ music and
resonance, and can imitate precious stones by chemical process.
They can cause rain to fall in a desert even out of season with the
snap of the fingers; stop bullets in flight with bare hands; instigate
still birth or temper difficult pregnancy; vanish into the thin air at
the scene of a fracas or involvement in a motor accident. Mavens
can travel through space to distant destinations in seconds by just
saying a few words or closing their eyes. They can help
politicians win elections; turn never-do-wells into overnight
millionaires or help them gain promotions at work, but usually at
a personal cost, of course. They can tell who did what, when and
why.
They hardly ever use their powers to do evil. They are restrained
from doing evil by the spiritual code of not doing harm to anyone
who has not wronged you because if you do, you destroy your
own spiritual defence. As a rule they hardly charge fees for their
services. They wait to be rewarded by satisfied customers who
tend to forget them after their fortunes have changed for the
better.
The mavens tend to live a relatively wretched life. Perhaps that is
their covenant for their spiritual gifts. They do not make noise
about their prowess and tend to allow people to seek them out
rather than advertise themselves. Their spiritual feats spread
through words of mouth.
All diviners, particularly mavens, have and rely on spirit mentors
or messengers. There is an item, could be a piece of stone totem,
scapular charm or similar, held in the hand or kept within
proximity of the diviner, which links him or her with the spirit
facilitator. Spirits can pick on anyone to bestow such gifts upon.
The gift can also be cultivated.
Many Africans use witchcraft to choose names, determine
careers, and pick spouses or business partners. There is nothing
wrong with this kind of witchcraft. It helps you to avoid making
life or career threatening or damaging mistakes. We must not
use the services of witch doctors that harm and kill people. We
must avoid such witches instinctively and report when we
discover them, to the police, Obas, Emirs, community leaders and
the media, for exposure and sanctions, because they are evil,
often counterfeit practitioners, and are extremely dangerous to
society. Such bogus or wicked diviners are known too by their
high fees.
We must not ask diviners to kill, maim or cause pain spiritually or
otherwise to others, so as to take their jobs, pinch their lovers,
make money or get on in business etc. We can only ask ‘good first
class’ diviners, to help narrow down our options, reduce or
eliminate mistakes over who to marry, what jobs to take, what
careers to embark upon, and what choices are best for us
generally. That way we avoid making costly, frustrating blunders
that tend to slow down progress or could be life threatening.
We could use our spirituality to determine our best way forward,
learn to improve our chances, and if we work hard and
adequately, we could ask to make progress in our endeavours
without causing harm to others. There is enough room in the sky
to contain the ambitions of all of us. The more people there are
that are successful around us, the better for our world. If I help
you, you would help my son who would help another person’s son
because he was helped. We must never ever indulge in the
spiritual use or sale of human blood or body parts. Nature can be
served in a modern and sophisticated format and setting. If, for
instance, Sango wants rituals served at the base of a tree, i.e., Idi
Araba or Idi Iroko, we can still have appropriate songs,
incantations, clothing and rituals, all wrapped in a barbecue.
Sanitize your tools, equipment, and work not in a dirty, smelly,
shrine but a neat, modern, environment similar to a classy
hospital or clinic.

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE HOLY GRAIL.

By Naiwu Osahon
According to testimonies, the Talmudic tradition, and A.C Celsius,
an encyclopaedist, there was a Jesus ben Panthera between
(100 – 50 BCE.) He was the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish
prostitute. He claimed to have been a miracle worker and briefly
plied his trade in Judea. He may have been stoned to death for
impersonating Horus, the ‘Divine One,’ and claiming to be his
reincarnation, when everyone knew his family background.
The Talmudic tradition’s vague memory is not identifiable with
the Gospel figure. It emphasizes that “the Christian religion
partially modelled their Jesus of Nazareth (that ought to be
mythic) on distorted knowledge about historical ben Panthera.”
Panthera died in 50 BCE, well before the Roman control of Judea.
The Romans claim that the crucifixion of Jesus Christ took place
between 26 CE and 36 CE, during which time, Pontius Pilate, the
Roman Procurator (Prosecutor) and his boss Lucius Aelius
Sejanus, the Prefect of the Praetorian Guard, were the Roman
Imperial officials in Judea. No crucifixion of any body could have
taken place in Judea at the time of Roman control, without the
sanction of these officials of the Praetorian Guard. So, if they
didn’t do it or sanction it, as the Romans are claiming, then Rome
was lying against the Jews to fuel their hatred.
Panthera was totally an inconsequential person. In fact, he was
considered a nuisance and treated as a common criminal and
street beggar that is why proper records were not kept of him. He
was only mentioned in passing, in the Talmudic oral traditions.
Therefore, the shroud wrapped around his corpse (if there was
one) could not have meant anything to anyone, not least the
Catholic Church that did not come into existence until 375 years
after his death.
Definitely, it would have meant nothing to “Joseph and his
family,” apart from the fact that they would have lacked the
sense and technology to preserve it for 375 years for the Catholic
Church. Did they give shreds to the Catholic Church? The shroud
of Torino or Turin, in carbon 30/33, shows a recent dating,
confirming that the Roman Catholic Church did not do a good job
of producing a hoax to convince the world.
Also, the birthday of Jesus was often put at between 4 – 1 BCE.
Octavian Gaius Augustus Caesar (63 BCE - 14 CE) issued his
‘Census edit’ in 8 BCE. If Jesus was born in 4 BCE or 3 BCE or 2
BCE or 1 BCE, he could not have been a new born baby at the
time the ‘Census edit’ was issued some four, five, six, seven years
earlier.
Mary Magdalene’s story was, therefore, cooked up. There is no
iota of truth in the claim that she was pregnant for Christ at the
time of the supposed crucifixion or that to protect the unborn
child, she was smuggled out to Gaul through the help of Christ’s
trusted uncle, Joseph of Arimathaea, because there was no Jesus
Christ.
In Gaul (France) with the protection and support of the Jewish
people that were supposed to have killed her husband (the
Church must think all humans are nincompoops), Mary survived
and gave birth to Sarah whose bloodline thrived quietly in France,
and in the fifth century intermarried with the French royal blood
that produced the Merovingian kings in Paris. Some story. Could
the ‘impeccably divine Jesus’ bloodline have thrived any less in
the Church fathers’ fertile imagination?
With the assassination of Dagobert, a Merovingian, stabbed in the
eyes while asleep, in the late seventh century by the Vatican, with
assistance from Pepin d’ Heristal, the son, Sigisbert, who escaped
the attack, continued the family lineage, which led to King
Godefroi de Bouillon. King Godefroi de Bouillon founded the
Priory of Sion in Jerusalem immediately after conquering the city
in 1099 CE and charged the Priory with protecting his secret,
which obviously must have been the rumours fanned by the
Catholic Church about his bloodline (link) with Jesus.

The Priory secretly heard about a treasure trove of hidden

documents buried beneath the ruins of Herod’s temple, which was
built on top of the earlier ruins of King Solomon’s temple. The
documents, of course, were of considerable interest and concern
to the Church, ready to do anything to reach and destroy them, if
they knew where they were hidden. The Priory de Sion believed
that the documents could provide corroborative evidence for
Godefroi’s family secrets and so vowed to recover them from
beneath the temple at whatever cost in time and expense.
The Priory created a military wing of nine Knights called the Order
of the Poor Knights of Christ and the Temple of Solomon (i.e. the
Knights Templar) and disguised as protectors of pilgrims in the
Holy Land. During the reign of Baldwin II, the Templar’s were in
the Holy Land protecting Christians on the roadways and because
they were sworn to poverty, they were not being paid for their
services. Their request of King Baldwin II, to be allowed to shelter
under the ruins of the temple was granted so they took up
residence there.
The documents they were after were supposed to be buried in the
Holy of Holies, a sacred chamber where God Himself resides. In
other words, the documents were in the heart of the Jewish faith.
Why would the Jews bury documents concerning inconsequential
Panthera, or of Jesus Christ that to them did not exist, in their
most sacred place?
The Knights lived in the ruins for nine years, excavating secretly
through solid rock. Their treasure trove is speculated to include,
apart from documents, precious items in gold, silver and diamond
from the abode of God. They took their treasure trove to Europe
where their influence, power and wealth soared overnight, helped
by Pope Innocent II, who issued a papal bull granting them
autonomy as an independent army over and above the influence
of the state and the Church. Some historians believe the Knights
must have blackmailed the Pope or that the Pope was trying to
silence them from revealing their findings.
The Knights soon amassed colossal wealth and posh estates
located in a dozen countries. They began giving credit lines to
bankrupt royals and charging interest, which is the nucleus of the
modern day banking system. By the 1300s, the Knights had
become so powerful and rich, Pope Clement V felt he had to do
something. With the collaboration of King Philippe IV of France,
the Pope set off an operation to destroy the Knights. He sent his
priests/military commandants across Europe, sealed letters to be
opened simultaneously on Friday 13 October, 1307.
The order when opened on the appointed day and time lied that
the Pope had been visited by God in a vision and that God had
told him that the Knights were heretics, devil worshippers,
homosexuals and sodomists, blasphemous in character and
defiling the cross. Thousands of Knights were rounded up,
tortured and burnt at the stake on that day, which makes the day
rankle even in modern times as the unlucky Friday the 13.
Despite Clements’s best efforts, some Knights escaped into exile
with the help of powerful allies.
The Knights’ parents, the Priory of Sion, who were only targeted
later, had been entrusted earlier with, not the gold, silver and
diamond urns etc., but the documents and artefacts; were able to
smuggle these out at night from a Paris preceptory into Templar’s
ships in La Rochelle. The last time the secret treasure trove was
sighted was in 1447 when a fire outbreak almost consumed it and
was seen by several eye witnesses being moved to safety in four
huge chests each carried by six men. Current speculations about
what the treasure trove contains include some ancient Egyptian
Mystery System materials; documents and artefacts about early
stages of kabbalism and the Jewish religion, remains linked with
some of their earliest religious icons, and information about their
persecution by the Romans and others. The treasure trove’s last
suspected abode was the United Kingdom, the land of King Arthur
and the Knights of the Round Table.
There were strong speculations about the possible release of the
secrets at the end of the astrological Age of Pisces the fish. Two
thousand years of spiritual fervent; of nurturing and spoon-
feeding by higher forces because man is incapable of thinking for
himself. The treasure trove was not released because there was
nothing to release but how the Roman Catholic Church was
blackmailed. Now that we have entered the Age of Aquarius, the
water bearer, a period when we should be able to think for
ourselves, I believe the treasure trove is back home now at its
final resting place in Paris, buried under (Francois Mitterrand) the
Sphinx’s brand new La Pyramid.
Humans have no need for religions
Because African faiths and spirituality are being used largely for
evil, they are retarding our progress as a people. We must keep
our cultures and traditions but not our faiths in their present
forms. We must refine and modernize our faiths and wean them
of their evil practices if they are to survive in any form. All
religions are being used for evil and if we cannot serve our own
Gods, why must we surrender our faiths to White and Arab Gods?
We do not need religions anyway. We have no business being
Christians because Christianity is a lie and is exploiting our people
to death with tithes. Have you not seen pastors buying private
jets? And along with Islam, we spend too much time on our butts
and knees praying instead of on our feet working. Our
benefactors have us where they want us, which is down here on
our knees begging and praying for their hand-outs while they are
challenging ‘God’ and partying on the Moon. And what precious
little time we struggle to squeeze out of our wretched existence,
we devote it to fighting and dying over our masters’ myopic
wars. Forget about Jesus, forget about Muhammad, forget about
spirits and if you must worship something, worship intellect,
worship bravery, worship brainpower, worship knowledge,
worship scholarship, that is what the Myk is about.

THE JEWS LIED AGAINST AFRICA TO ASCEND

By NAIWU OSAHON
Around 1640 BCE, some 70 Canaan (Black), Hebrews under the
leadership of Joseph, son of Jacob, son of Isaac, entered Egypt
from Canaan, fleeing from another great drought. Doris Darkwah
in (The Role of Africa in the rise of Judaism) tells us that: “They
were welcomed and given food and shelter by the hospitable
Egyptians. They enjoyed the rights and privileges of Egyptian
citizenship, some becoming high officials in the government
giving up Semitic names for Egyptian ones. Joseph was in
Pharaoh Kamoses cabinet as Prime Minister and took the Egyptian
name of Zaphnathpaaneah. Yanhamu was a leading General
under Amenophis IV (Akhnaton.)
“The Great Pyramids and the Obelisk had already been completed
before any Hebrew set foot in Egypt; hence the idea of their being
used as slave labour on those constructions is false. Pictures
found on tombs show the Hebrews to be foreigners from their
clothes and beards, but also that they were not in captivity. Of
course, many of them laboured side by side with the Egyptians in
making bricks for the outer enclosures of temples or cities, the
main building effort of the day.”
Towards the end of the Hebrew’s 400 years sojourn in Egypt in
1230 BCE, when they had grown in number to be a sizable
percentage of the population, Moses was already over 70 years
old. The Egyptologist, James Breasted in (Dawn of Conscience)
points out that his name was not Hebrew as conventionally
accepted, “but an Egyptian word ‘Mose,’ or ‘Maose,’ meaning
child or boy-son, to which a prefix of a god’s name may have
been attached and lost over the years.”
Ernest Jones (Birth & Death of Moses) confirms that Moses was
the son of Bathia, daughter of Pharaoh Seti I, and the Pharaoh
himself. In other words, Moses was an incestuous child. Doris
Darkwah in (The Role of Africa in the rise of Judaism) tells us that
the circumstances of Moses’ birth as portrayed by the Old
Testament were pure fantasy. “African myths about finding a
baby in water were quite common, especially in honouring
national heroes,” at the time. Obviously, Pharaoh Seti and his
daughter contrived the abandoned baby in basket scenario to
avoid incestuous stigma and create the opportunity to look after
Moses in the palace.
Sale in his book (Al Koran, P257, 1784) tells us that: “Moses was a
very swarthy man.” Sir T.W. Arnold in his book (Preaching Islam,
Westminster 1896) says: “According to Mohammedan tradition,
Moses was a Black man.” The Bible confirms this in Exodus IV.6.
Roger in (100 Amazing Facts about the Negro) tells us that Moses
was a Black African.
Moses received his theological education at Heliopolis. He went
into the Lodge (the Mystery System) at age 7 and could not have
come out until aged 47 because it required 40 years to train as a
priest in all the disciplines. In fact, Moses was trained for the role
of Pharaoh with all the magic and spiritual powers entailed in
this. Moses then spent a few years in Ethiopia in continuation of
his education as a prince of Egypt. He did not conquer Ethiopia as
some Jewish film makers would want the world to believe. No
king of Ethiopia accompanied Moses to Egypt as portrayed by the
film. An emissary of the king accompanied Moses from the land of
his ancestors back to Egypt because he was a prince and that was
the tradition of the era.
According to Doris Darkwah, Moses became the spokesman for
the Hebrews and introduced them to “a monotheistic type of
religion, which he had learned as an Egyptian from the teachings
of Akhnaton as a prince and pharaoh in training for 40 years, in
the Mystery System. It appears Moses first preached his
adaptation of Akhnaton’s religion to his people, the Egyptians,
and found few followers.” He then turned to the Hebrews who
were more receptive especially after Moses had killed one of his
own (an Egyptian) in defence of a Hebrew. Moses became the
spokesperson for the Hebrews.
Moses, at about the age of 47, ran away from his father, Pharaoh
Seti I, for committing murder. His brother Aaron ran away with
him because he was charged with stealing from the Pharaoh’s
treasury. Moses met Deborah while on the run and it seems
Deborah said confidently, pointing to Moses: 'that Egyptian.'
There was nothing in Moses' make up to suggest he was a
Hebrew. He was not wearing any special clothes nor did he have
a beard. He looked like any other African Egyptian brother,
Deborah was familiar with. Moses escaped to the Midianites on
one of the Sanai hills for succour, protection, and witchcraft
powers, against his imaginary pursuers. Midianites were Africans
from Ethiopia worshipping a number of Deities or Gods, the
principal one being El Elyon or what the Bible claims to be
Lucifer.
The Midianites’ chief priest was called Jethro, a renowned
spiritualist, considered to be a father of witchcraft because of his
spiritual prowess and awesome cult. Moses ended up spending
some 30 years in the desert with Jethro, who initiated Moses into
his cult and gave Moses one of his daughters in marriage. The
marriage was blessed with two children. All three, (wife, two
sons) are lost to Jewish history because they did not fit into later
Jewish religious politics. Some religious historians’ argument that
Aaron and Mariam’s objection to Moses’ Ethiopian wife was one of
colour is wrong. There was no colour prejudice as a culture until
the White man invented it at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, to
launch their selfish, deceitful religion, and eventually justify their
slave trade and colonization of Africans. Besides, the Jews at that
time were Africans. Mariam’s objection was obviously a national
or tribal one, the same as exists today among some West African
ethnic groups.
Moses’ spiritual skills, which he first learnt as a Pharaoh in
training (or Prince of Egypt) was reinforced by the teachings of his
father-in-law. Jethro honed Moses’ witchcraft skills. Moses saw a
chance to use the Midianites’ cult as a political and spiritual
rallying point to build his religious followership and take his
revenge on Egypt for deriding his earlier religious teachings and
turning him into a refugee and murder outcast on the run. Moses
adopted or was adopted by one of the junior deities of the
Midianites. Moses himself claimed that his Midianite deity gave
his name as YHWH pronounced as Yahweh, and that El Elyon,
the chief of the Midianites (Canaanites) deities was superior to
Yahweh.
Moses said it was El Elyon (God Most High) who divided nations
(of the world) and shared them among the gods (or sons of God.)
That the nation allotted by El Elyon to Yahweh (a god or junior
deity or son of God) was Israel. Give ear O heavens, and I will
speak and let the earth hear the words of my mouth. Remember
the days of old, consider the years of many generations, ask your
father and he will show you, your elders, and they will tell you.
When El Elyon (the Most High) gave to the nations their
inheritance. When he separated the sons of men he fixed the
bounds of the peoples, according to the number of the sons of
God. For Yahweh’s portion is his people, Jacob (Israel) his allotted
heritage.
Moses said Yahweh introduced himself as the god of (his
followers) the Hebrews. Moses could not have used capital letter
‘God’ for Yahweh because he knew that that was reserved for El
Elyon. Seventy Jewish scholars introduced the fraud in 200 BCE
while translating Hebrew into Greek. Yahweh proudly called
himself a tribal god. Moses claimed that Yahweh said: “I‘m the
god of your fathers, the god of Abraham, the god of Isaac and the
god of Jacob,” Exodus 3:6, 15. Notice that god Yahweh did not
say he was the ‘God’ of mankind or even of the Africans who in
the guise of the Midianites first brought his cult into being.
The Jewish scholars claimed that Yahweh regretted creating man
and that He decided to wipe ‘man’ off the face of the earth
because ‘man’ turned out to be wicked. A bogus claim by the
Jewish scholars because Moses himself claimed that El Elyon was
Yahweh’s superior. Yahweh saw that the wickedness of ‘man’
was great on earth, and that the thought of his heart fashioned
nothing but wickedness all day long. “I will rid the earth’s face of
man, my own creation (Gen. 6: 5-7.) I wonder who taught ‘man’
to be wicked. Yahweh killed Uzzah for trying to prevent the ‘Ark
of God‘from falling down when the oxen carrying it stumbled. No
sane person would kill for such a reason but gods are probably
not governed by mere rationalism. “And the anger of the Lord
was kindled against Uzzah, and ‘God’ smote him there because
he put forth his hand to the Ark and he died there besides the Ark
of God,” (2 Sam 6:6-7.)
Yahweh was not only prepared to dispossess others of their
properties for the Hebrews, he encouraged his adopted children
to indulge in stealing and other immoral acts. On the eve of the
Hebrews’ departure from Egypt, after failing to overwhelm the
Pharaoh with a series of plagues, including the killing of every
first born of men and animals, (Exodus Chapters 7-11) he ordered
the Hebrews to slaughter innocent babies, old men and women,
found in the captured city. Do not “spare them, but kill both man
and woman, infant and suckling,” (I Sam, 15:3.)
Yahweh, ‘the Jewish fake creator of man,’ had no fore-knowledge
of things that would happen in future, nor could he foresee the
consequences of his action. Often he was sorry after the event
turned out to be contrary to his expectation. Yahweh could not
foresee Saul disobeying him after making Saul king of Israel. “I
regret having made Saul king for he has turned away from me
and has not carried out my order,” (I Sam 15: 10.11.) Saul’s
problem was his refusal to go to the city of Amalek to destroy
everybody and everything he found there, adult humans, babies,
animals, etc. Yahweh was capable of all human emotions:
jealousy, anger, sympathy, love, hate, mercy, but was more easily
provoked than anything else even by his professed children.
Yahweh was extraterrestrial humanoid. All Gods whether spelt
with the capital letter ‘G’ or small letter ‘g’ are ex-humans. They
are dead humans or ancestors and Africans created all of them.
The Midianites created Yahweh and Yahweh’s physical, spiritual,
or mythical interaction with Moses is supposed to have happened
well before 1230 BCE.
Moses saw Yahweh’s back because Yahweh covered Moses’ face
with his hand while passing. “I will cover you with my hand until I
have passed by, then I will take away my hand and you shall see
my back; but my face shall not be seen, “(Exodus 33: 22-23.) But
Moses had seen Yahweh’s face earlier on in (Exodus 33: 11)
….And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face as a man speaketh
unto his friend. The Lord came to visit Abraham and ate in his
house. Isaiah saw the Lord in his temple. Gideon, Ezekiel,
Samson’s parents, Daniel, all saw the Lord. Yahweh wrestled with
Jacob (Gen. 32: 21) and Jacob nearly defeated him until he
managed to remove a bone to wrench Jacob’s hip. Some God?
Yahweh himself said: “if there is a prophet among you, I speak
with him in a dream. Not so with my servant Moses; he is
entrusted with all my house. With him I speak mouth to mouth,
clearly, and not in dark speech, and he beholds the form of
Yahweh….” (Numbers 12:5-8 RSV.) Even with prophets, I Yahweh
communicate by visions and dreams. But that is not how I
communicate with my servant Moses. He is entrusted with my
entire house. I speak to him face to face, directly and not in
riddles! He sees Yahweh as he is….. (New Living Translation.) It
is this Moses who spoke to Yahweh face to face and saw Yahweh
as he is, that revealed that El Elyon, the chief of the Canaanite’s
gods, was God Most High and Yahweh’s superior.
Moses was visiting Yahweh in a space craft. The Bible tells us:
“God descended on the Mount Sanai with thunders and lightings,
the mountain quaked.” One time when Moses stayed away for too
long, Hebrews equated Yahweh’s idol to a Golden Calf. Hebrews
gave Satan (Yahweh) to the world to worship. According to Yemi
Ogunsola in the Guardian newspaper, Nigeria, January 4, 2009,
the Jewish god Yahweh is not God Almighty but a deity inferior to
God El Elyon. “It was not God who chose the Jews as his own
people; it was god Yahweh, a deity. It was not God who unjustly
promised other peoples lands (Palestine/Canaan) to the Israelites;
it was Yahweh. It was not God who led the Israelites in the
invasion and occupation of those ‘promised’ lands; it was
Yahweh. It was not God who ordered the wholesale slaughter of
men, women and children of Palestine, Canaan; it was Yahweh.”
Moses invoked the energy of Yahweh (i) to fight his father, (ii) to
help his followers get out of Egypt and (iii) to craft kabbalism.

(i) Moses fought his father, Pharaoh Seti I of Egypt, with

witchcraft.
Moses’ kabbalism (or witchcraft skill) was put into effect in the
name of Yahweh. Yahweh sent Black Egypt a plague of blood.
“…He struck the water of the Nile, and all the water was changed
into blood. The fish in the Nile died and the river smelled so bad
that the Egyptians could not drink its water. Blood was
everywhere in Egypt,” Exodus 7:20, 21. Then he sent plagues of
frogs, Exodus 8:6; gnats, Exodus 8:16; swarms of flies… ‘I will
make a distinction between my people and your people,’ Yahweh
said, Exodus 8:22,24; ‘…. livestock on the field……….your horses
and donkeys and camels and cattle, sheep and goat’ (whatever
the animals did to upset this tribal God) ‘I will make a
distinction……..so that no animal belonging to the Israelites will
die.’ Exodus 9:4. Yahweh plagued Africans with boils … that
were on them and on all the Egyptians, Exodus 9:10. “………by
now I could have struck you with a plague that would wipe you off
the earth……to show you my power… (I wonder if the ‘Universal’
God needed to boost about showing his power.) …….by this time
tomorrow I will send the worst hailstorm that has ever fallen on
Egypt.” Exodus 9:13-19. So Yahweh sent the plagues of locust,
Exodus 10:13; of darkness, Exodus 10:21 and finally of firstborn,
Exodus 11:5. The true ‘Universal’ God of Creation would not have
been so vindictive and merciless against his own creation.

(ii) Moses leads the Hebrews out of Egypt to another land

taken from Africans.
The myth about the parting of waters to facilitate a groups’
escape is distorted from some ancient African myths and writing.
The African Sun god Bacchus had a magic rod, which could
change into a snake and could be used to draw water from a rock
as well. He crossed the Red Sea without getting wet, and divided
the waters of the rivers Orontes and Hydaspus by the touch of his
rod and crossed both dry-footed.
According to Raphael Petal in his book, Tents of Jacob: “The
Biblical myth served two basic functions: to validate the idea of
the Hebrews having the right to possess the land of Israel. The
other was to show that whatever adversities (i.e. famine, quarrels
between brothers, involuntary servitude) forced them to leave the
land of Canaan or Palestine to live in a land of dispersion, such as
Egypt or Babylon, they longed to return to the ‘Promised land’
and usually did.’’
Yahweh loves his adopters. He claimed to hate the Amorites,
Philistines, Canaanites, Jebusites, (all Blacks) and Hittites (Whites)
and the rest of mankind and threatened to wipe them off the face
of the earth so as to give their land to his children, the Israelites.
Yahweh hated all of mankind but the Israelites. The Jews were
not a tribe. They were only held together by the promise of
inheriting their own land and an adapted Egyptian religion. To be
an Israelite, you have to be a Jew. It is a religion and until Hitler’s
pogrom against them, Israelites were not an ethnic or political
group. Hitler turned them into a tribe.
The Exodus story is, therefore, not about race. The curse by the
Hebrew god Yahweh arose principally from Noah and his three
sons’ fictional myth. Africans are the ancestors of mankind.
Human origin is Black; therefore, the White mythical Noah and his
three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, could only have been Black.
Ham turned White, as did all the cursed in the Bible: Gahazi,
Eljahas, Greedy servants: Kings 11: 5, 27) when he uncovered and
sodomized his father (Genesis 9: 22, 24.) Hams’ White children
still revel in homosexuality today. By the way, Noah’s flood did
not disrupt civilization, and the walls of Jerico fell long before the
Israelites got there.
In any case, Israelites were Black at the time. Tacitus the Roman
historian of 90 CE says that the Romans of his day popularly
believed that the Jews who then abounded in Europe, came from
Egypt, the land of the Blacks. The Bible classes the Ethiopians
and the Jews together: “Are ye not as the children of Ethiopia unto
me, O children of Israel, saith the Lord.” Chaldea, the land in
which the Jews originated, was also Black land. Abraham came
from Ur of the Chaldees (Gen. 11, 31.) Godfrey Higgins confirms
in his book that the Chaldees at that point in history were
Negroes. The Israelites were running away from African Egypt to
an African fringe country, Palestine, and imagined that the
Egyptians they were wishing dead were pursuing them.
Such stories are pure fantasies, which all disadvantaged people
indulge in to try to overcome, bear, minimize psychological
trauma, or ameliorate sufferings and pains of the moment. It is a
temporary mental blocking out of experience or experiences
mechanism. They are mere escape valves or transient mental
respite. Indulging in daydream is the harmless opium of the weak
and oppressed against the strong. Several future myths are
being spawned right now, around the world, by for example, the
victims of racism wishing God to come down a ladder from
heaven to intervene on their behalf by dealing ruthlessly with the
architects and perpetrators of racism. Then transport them (the
victims) to some make-believe world of bliss or paradise without
racism or pains. In other words, to the ‘Promised Land.’ This is
what prayers are about.
Moses being an Egyptian priest, who rebelled against the
established religion of his people, was not missed when he finally
emigrated with his followers from Egypt through the Sanai desert
in 1230 BCE. The period experienced a great deal of migrations in
and out of Egypt anyway. The Bible says that 600,000 men left
with Moses, which according to Haushoffer meant a total of
3,154,000 men, women and children, all Black, from being
Canaanites and crossbreeding with African Egyptians.
To an offence by the Hebrews in the wilderness, Yahweh
threatened: “Let me alone that my wrath may burn hot against
them and I may consume them, (Exodus 32:10.) Moses begged
him not to because Egypt would use it to mock him. He changed
his mind and allowed peace to reign until his children were
discouraged by the report of the spies sent to survey the land
promised them. Yahweh threatened again to kill all the Hebrews
in the wilderness. Moses again persuaded him against the action,
like one would do to a five-year-old child. “Now if thou does kill
this people as one man, then the nations who have heard thy
name will say, because the Lord was unable to bring this people
into the land he swore to give to them, therefore, he has slain
them in the wilderness. (Numbers 14:15.)
When Moses himself annoyed Yahweh by striking the rock two
times rather than speak to get water as Yahweh had instructed,
there was no one to intervene for Moses this time. Yahweh vowed
he would only allow Moses to see the ‘Promised Land’ with his
eyes from a distance and not to enter it. People saw him die but
could not account for his body. After Yahweh killed Moses and
apparently appropriated his body for his extraterrestrial race
experiments, General Joshua took charge and led the Exodus from
about 1220 BCE. Only 2 original Egyptian Jews out of the over 3
million that left Egypt with Moses arrived in 1190 BCE, with the
Jews born en-route, to the ‘Promised land,’ Palestine. Joshua
divided the land among the 12 tribes of Israel. Palestine was
named after the former conquerors of the land, Philistines.
Chiekh Anta Diop argues in (The African origin of Civilization) that
the cynical, mercantile spirit, which constitutes the foundation of
(Genesis Exodus) of the Bible, “is due to the conditions in which
the Jewish people were placed from the start. Forming clusters of
stateless persons since their dispersion, they have constantly
experienced a double anxiety, that of assuring their material
existence, often in hostile surroundings and the fear resulting
from obsession with periodic pogroms. In the relatively recent
past, in the Eurasian steppes, physical conditions had allowed for
no illusion, no lethargy, and if man failed to create a marvelous
civilization there, it was because the environment was too
hostile. It was a political and social condition that allowed the
Jews no intellectual let-up. They did not begin to count in history,
however, until David and Solomon, or the beginning of the first
millennium, the epoch of the Queen of Sheba. Egyptian
civilization was already several millennia old, a fortiori Nubian-
Sudanese civilization.”
Jerusalem became capital of Israel in 1000 BCE, and David
emerged as king. Where Moses was a giant, larger than life and
beyond lust, David was ruthless. He was lust itself, who whored,
raped, lied and cheated.
Songs of Solomon, Chapter 1, Verses 5 and 6, reads:

“Ye daughters of Canaan look not upon me because I am

Black, because I’m beautiful. My mother put me in the vineyard,
but my sister, she kept indoors.”

Whatever forced the above confession, of course, Canaanites

were Black. Solomon began building his temple called (Tempum
Dei) in Jerusalem in 961 BCE. Solomon divided the Hebrews into
ten tribes of Israel and 13 tribes of Judas. He was a good but
minor leader with a big heart and robust talents for business. He
collaborated with the merchants of Tyre to build merchant
marines that brought Palestine a great deal of prosperity from
their foreign market exploits. His reign was the most significant
in Hebrew’s history until recent times. He never ruled the world
as the Jews would want us believe. He was just a successful
businessman who ruled a small strip of desert land. Queen of
Sheba married Solomon, from which union sprang Prince Menelik,
the Lion of Judah and the forebear of Emperor Haile Selassie of
Ethiopia.
The Assyrians over ran the Hebrew nation in 721 BCE. Ten tribes
of Israel were heard no more, giving rise to the saying, the lost
tribes of Israel. Taharqa, the youngest son of Pharaoh Piankhi, at
the head of the Egyptian army, marched into Palestine and Asia
and triumphed against the Assyrian forces of Sennacherib.
Babylonian Emperor, Nebuchadnezzar, captured Jerusalem in 586
BCE, and transferred the Jewish population to Babylon. This is
known in Jewish history as the period of captivity and it lasted for
70 years. Cyrus the Persian leader, sacked Babylon in 538 BCE,
and expanded his empire rapidly over most of the Middle East.
Cyrus permitted the Jewish exiles to return to Jerusalem, but
instead they spread largely into countries of the Middle East and
North Africa.
(iii) Crafting of the Jewish Kabbalah.
Like all the other manipulations in the Bible, Moses skilfully
modified Akhnaton’s monotheism to fit the Hebrew people by
pledging the Hebrews to one deity or god alone. According to
Doris Darkwah, “after Moses gave the Hebrew people an African
religion; he then created a history of his followers in retrospect,
drawing more on Egyptian and Babylonian myths than from any
sort of fact. He had Abraham predicting events he could not have
possibly known, such as the 400-years stay in Egypt… Finally,
Moses gave the Hebrews credit for African customs, some quite
ancient. One classic example was the adoption of the rite of
circumcision, Egyptian custom, thousands of years old by Moses’
day. Bodies of Egyptian mummies found in recent times in what
were prehistoric cemeteries gave evidence of such a custom. In
addition, the actual operation was depicted in a drawing found on
an Egyptian tomb, which existed between 2700-2800 BCE at
Memphis.”
Some of the many laws that the indigenous Africans had written
and obeyed thousands of years before Abraham entered Egypt
became the Decalogue or Ten Commandments. (Exodus 20;
Deuteronomy 5.) Moses adopted his Ten Commandments from
the ancient 147 Egyptian laws called the “Negative Confessions,”
and lied that God handed the laws down to him on Mount Sanai
after the Exodus, (Exodus XX: 1-17.) Why has God stopped
handing down Commandments since Moses? Or is his God, like
our Osiris who was human, dead too?
Other African customs borrowed by the Hebrews include,
according to Doris Darkwah: “transference of sins to a scapegoat,
usually an animal; not eating pig, considering it unclean, but on
the other hand using it in religious rites, implying some sanctity of
the animal; the Passover Feast which was really an old African
custom, connected with the celebration of the Spring Equinox,
and passing over of the Sun from South to North of the equator;
libations or sacrificial drinking such as in the Sabbath Evening
Service by the Rabbi, which is a traditional African practice dating
back, thousands of years. In African ceremonies, it marks the
start and completion of certain rituals; the sacrifice of the ‘first
male lamb’ was an ancient African ceremonial tradition
(particularly in Egypt) for ‘cleansing the soul,’ thousands of years
before Moses was born.”

The Romans lied against the Jews

Between 64–66 CE, the Romans terrorized the Jews to no end,
apparently because of their mercantilist skills. The Romans
accused them of killing Jesus Christ, to launch anti-Semitism
sentiments and hatred against the Jews globally. The Jews, under
the name of ‘zealots,’ revolted over what they described as the
tyranny of the Romans.
The Jews could not have killed Jesus Christ whom they have no
record of his existence. Besides, Pontius Pilate, the Roman
Procurator and his boss Lucius Aelius Sejanus, the Prefect of the
Praetorian Guard, where the Roman Imperial officials in Judea,
during the confused dates of between 26 CE and 36 CE, of the
crucifixion. No one was sure when or how it took place, and it
could not have happened without the sanction of the Roman
Imperial Guard. If the Roman Guards ordered the supposed
crucifixion, why were they holding the Jews responsible? It was
obviously a hoax to create the excuse to give the Jews a bad
name.
In 70 CE, Emperor Titus (39 -81 CE) crushed the zealots and
destroyed their sacred Mount Moriah, triggering the second
Exodus of the Jews from their homeland. In 135 CE, the Romans
suppressed the Jewish Bar-Cochba’s revolt, causing another
Jewish dispersion, and the beginning of what is known as Diaspora
Jews. The Jews entered Europe in appreciable numbers,
particularly Spain and Portugal, in the first century CE.
They were expelled from England in 1290 CE for anti-Semitic
reasons. Spain expelled them for the same reasons on August 2,
1492, and Portugal did likewise in 1497 CE. After their expulsion
from Spain and Portugal, they immigrated in large numbers to
Holland.
Michael Bradley (Echoes of Ancient Truth) provides considerable
evidence about the Jewish and, therefore, religious links with
Columbus’ ‘discovery’ of the ‘New World.’ Prof. Alvin Boyd Kuhn
in (Who is this King of Glory?) argues that: Columbus was very
likely born of a heretical family. To start with, Bradley suspects
that there were two Columbus,’ one a master pirate of French
extraction (which probably explains the paucity of information
about Columbus’ early life) who transformed into the one we
know in history. Bradley says that the Columbus we know very
likely had Jewish background.
Bradley tells us that the purpose of Columbus’ voyage to the ‘New
World’ was not just in pursuit of gold but also to found a New
Jerusalem. That, European Jews financed Columbus’ voyage to
the ‘New World,’ to allow their persecuted Jewish population in
Europe, disguising as Catholics, find a new home where they
could practice their true religion. Bradley names the sponsors of
Columbus: “as things turned out, Columbus didn’t need Isabella’s
jewels because he’d already obtained the backing of four Spanish
financial moguls: Luis de Santangel, Alonso de Harana, Alonso de
Carvajal and Diego de Harang. All of these men were
“Conversos,” former Jews, who had supposedly and voluntarily
accepted the Roman Catholic faith.”
Bradley also tells us about the roots of religious conflicts in
medieval Europe, the confusing personality of Jesus Christ, and
says: “Godfroi de Bouillon wanted to create a New Jerusalem in
the Holy Land where the three great faiths of the West could be
reconciled. He failed, but this sort of crusade is what apparently
motivated Christopher Columbus and his supporters and financial
backers. His voyage may have been a crusade to establish a
‘New Jerusalem,’ in a ‘New World’ and, I think, this is the light in
which we should view his motivations. It is also a perspective and
a light that will permit some insight into the anomalous facts and
unlikely coincidences of his life. He seems to have been a part of
an ancient… conspiracy to create a world of religious toleration
between Jew, Christian and Moslem. A New Jerusalem. That I
think was Columbus’ concept of a crusade, and the only worth
while kind of crusade.”
In the last chapter of Michael Bradley’s book he says: “In 1506
CE, the Bishop of Puerto Rico complained to their Majesties and
the Vatican that ships were bringing “mostly Jews” as colonists.
Four years later, in 1510 CE, the Bishop of Cuba made exactly the
same complaint to the same authorities; the ships brought mostly
Jews and he adds, “Secret heretics.”
The official Royal census for 1545 CE, noted that twenty-five
percent of Mexico City’s population was admitted and openly
practicing Jews; and this figure did not include “secret Jews,”
heretics, converses, or secret Muslims. If this was truly the case,
then the majority of Mexico City’s population must have been
non-Catholic. This seems to have been true because, in 1527 CE,
Francisco Fernandez de Castillo wrote: “there are more Jews than
Catholics in Mexico City.” Apart from the large importation of
Jews, Europe dumped a massive portion of its undesirable
elements in the Americas and the Caribbean Islands. A significant
number of the crew of the three vessels of Christopher Columbus,
for instance, were criminals let out of jails because it was difficult
to recruit others for the dangerous journey. Most colonizers of
the ‘New World’ and Africa were, in fact, failures in Europe, i.e.,
convicts, criminals, the unemployed, unemployable, and the
unproductive, let loose as explorers, missionaries, slave traders
and catchers. It is the character and nature of these invaders,
more than anything else that heightened their vicious and
criminal impact on the unsuspecting ‘New World’ and Africa.
In Holland, many Jews joined with others to form the Dutch West
Indies Company on June 3, 1621, to exploit the “New World,” to
establish their first settlement in New Amsterdam, in 1654 CE.
Other settlements followed rapidly to expand the frontiers of
capitalism to their benefit and that of the West. Developing at
the same time with their thrusts into the New World was their
search for African slaves and land to exploit. They acquired the
Dutch East Indian Company just as its first ship was to sail to
South Africa, and constituted a large proportion of that first and
later group of settlers that occupied the Cape of Good Hope in
1652 CE. They formed small Jewish settlements in Capetown and
other parts of South Africa in the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries CE.
In 1828 CE, Chaka the king of Zulu granted Nathaniel Isaacs the
use of a large track of land for himself and the Jewish people.
Then along with some Dutch settlers, calling themselves
Afrikaners, they forcefully took over the rest of South Africa and
imposed apartheid, another name for Zionism, on the Black
owners of South Africa. With the discovery of gold and diamond
in the territory, a business they absolutely controlled along with
two or three other Western owned companies, they became very
prosperous. Today, although only about a quarter of a million
strong in South Africa, they control the economy through their
gold and diamond cartels, and use the military know how and
clout of Israel, as agents of the West, to continue to protect subtle
apartheid and their investments.
The Jews themselves have been through hell in the hands of the
Europeans. Devil’s incarnate, Adolf Hitler, as the German leader,
exterminated six million Jews in cold blood in his gas chambers in
Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Dachau, between 1933-35 CE, in
attempt to preserve his Aryan race purity.
Zionism was an idea touted by a comedian called Theodore Hertzl
in his acts in Central Europe. In 1896 CE, Theodore Herzl
published “Judenstaat,” in Vienna, advocating the establishment
of a Jewish national homeland. Hertzl first suggested a homeland
for the Jews in Guyana, but the British were not impressed, so he
toyed with Kenya or Uganda, which were also under British
control at the time. Then Hertzl wrote to Jan Christian Smits,
requesting for a Jewish homeland in South Africa so that they can
help civilize Africans.
Although the Zionist movement had a choice of settling in Uganda
or the Sanai Peninsula from Chamberlain, the British Colonial
Secretary, on April 23, 1903, Uganda did not really count. The
Jews were after the opportunity South Africa or the Peninsula
offered them, to control at least one of the two major navigational
routes of international trade around Africa, the Suez and the
Cape, and if they got the first, to enslave their second set of
people.
The Balfour Agreement signed by Chaim Weitzman, an English
Jew living in England, Jonah B. Wise, Stephen Wise, and others
from the USA, provided an opportunity for the Jews to pull a fast
one on the Arabs. The agreement formed the basis of the action
of President Harry S. Truman of the USA, in 1947, which resulted
in the creation of the State of Israel in Palestine. The Jewish State
rapidly went into decline until it surfaced under Ben-Gurion in
modern times.

The Jews seem to have been taking out their pains on Africans
who are, in fact, their closest relatives and ought to have been
treated as their closest allies.
The Jews from the beginning have had their hands in all the
misfortunes of the African world. It started with the concealment
of the African identity of Moses and theirs. The lies about
meeting God of the universe on Mount Sanai and being the
chosen people. Their fictitious curse that launched their notion of
superior, inferior people; their usurpation of African beliefs and
myths without giving due credit; the distortions of early history
and African religion, and the fake history of their plight as a
people in Egypt. They were neck-deep in the Black slavery
holocaust from which they amassed huge fortunes to set
themselves apart as the shrewd and wealthy Jews we know
today.
Despite all we have been through in the hands of the Jews, I
admire them a great deal for the way they have overcome their
difficulties to become masters of the world in every respect. Their
religion and kabbalism helped them and Africans want to learn
from them, what was lost to them, and end their own pains that
have come from all quarters, and have gone on for too long.