Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMFREL MEETING ON TRAFFICKING
Phnom
Penh,
16
July
2008
Excellency,
Ladies
and
Gentlemen,
I should like to thank COMFREL for the opportunity to speak to you today.
LSCW
works
to
prevent
human
trafDicking
and
the
exploitation
of
Cambodian
migrants.
This
morning,
I
want
brieDly
to
share
with
you
our
views
on
some
of
the
challenges
facing
Cambodia
as
it
seeks
to
implement
its
new
anti‐trafDicking
law.
The new trafDicking law
As
many
of
you
will
know,
the
Law
on
the
Suppression
of
Human
TrafDicking
and
Sexual
Exploitation
came
into
force
in
February.
In
brief,
the
new
law
aims
to
address
four
key
areas.
First,
it
deDines
trafDicking
and
creates
a
number
of
new
criminal
offences.
These
are
aimed
at
prosecuting
trafDickers
and
those
who
assist
them.
The
law
applies
to
trafDicking
within
Cambodia
and
also
to
cross‐border
trafDicking
to
other
countries.
Secondly,
it
creates
criminal
offences
relating
to
prostitution
and
child
prostitution.
The
law
does
not
criminalise
prostitution
–
and
it
is
not
intended
to
prosecute
sex
workers
–
but
it
targets
those
who
procure,
manage
and
facilitate
prostitution.
Thirdly,
the
new
law
makes
it
a
criminal
offence
to
produce,
sell
or
display
pornography.
And
Dinally,
it
criminalises
sexual
intercourse
or
acts
of
indecency
committed
with
children
under
the
age
of
Difteen.
Cambodia’s
lawmakers
deserve
credit
for
enacting
the
new
law.
However,
the
law
can
only
be
effective
in
countering
human
trafDicking
if
it
is
properly
implemented.
In
my
view,
there
are
currently
three
challenges
to
implementation.
Challenge 1: Training
The
Dirst
challenge
is
one
of
training.
If
the
law
is
to
work
in
practice,
all
those
who
are
charged
with
its
enforcement
must
understand
the
law,
and
just
as
importantly,
understand
the
concept
of
human
trafDicking.
They
need
to
understand
that
victims
of
trafDicking
have
no
freedom
of
choice.
Victims
may
be
committing
criminal
acts,
but
they
do
so
involuntarily
and
because
they
are
forced
to
do
things
against
their
will.
Law
enforcers
need
to
understand
that
all
people
–
men,
women
and
children
–
can
become
victims.
Many
victims
of
trafDicking
are
also
victims
of
sexual
exploitation,
but
they
may
also
be
illegal
migrants,
unregistered
workers
or
street
beggars.
Law
enforcers
need
to
understand
the
new
criminal
offences
that
the
trafDicking
law
creates.
They
also
need
to
be
clear
about
what
the
law
does
not
criminalise.
This
is
particularly
important
in
relation
to
sex
work
and
prostitution.
If
the
law
is
to
work,
all
those
charged
with
law
enforcement
and
the
administration
of
justice
–
from
the
police
and
investigating
magistrates
to
prosecutors,
judges
and
government
ofDicials
–
need
to
receive
adequate
training
on
human
trafDicking.
Challenge
2:
Conduct
The
second
challenge
is
one
of
conduct.
By
‘conduct’,
I
mean
the
behaviour
and
attitude
of
those
who
work
with
victims
of
trafDicking.
All
too
often,
trafDicking
victims
are
perceived
and
treated
as
criminals.
This
is
a
particular
problem
with
victims
who
are
forced
to
work
in
the
sex
industry.
It
is
also
a
problem
with
victims
who
are
trafDicked
to
foreign
countries
and
then,
as
illegal
migrants,
are
exploited
at
work.
Those
in
positions
of
authority
–
and
especially
the
police,
who
will
often
be
a
Dirst
point
of
contact
–
need
to
be
able
to
differentiate
between
criminals
and
victims.
They
need
to
treat
trafDicked
persons
as
victims
who
require
and
should
be
entitled
to
support
and
assistance.
It
is
surely
in
the
interests
of
law
enforcement
to
support
victims
of
trafDicking.
A
victim
who
receives
proper
support
is
more
likely
to
pursue
a
criminal
or
civil
case
against
their
trafDicker.
This,
in
turn,
makes
it
easier
for
the
police
and
courts
to
bring
successful
prosecutions
against
offenders.
The
legal
system
needs
to
provide
justice
for
victims,
appropriate
punishment
for
offenders,
and
a
deterrent
against
future
trafDicking.
LSCW
is
one
of
a
number
of
NGOs
working
in
this
area.
By
working
together,
the
government
and
non‐governmental
sectors
in
Cambodia
should
be
able
to
meet
the
challenge
of
providing
support
and
assistance
for
trafDicking
victims.
Challenge 3: Regional cooperation
The
third
challenge
is
one
of
regional
co‐operation.
TrafDicking
is
not
solely
a
Cambodian
problem
–
it
affects
the
entire
Greater
Mekong
region
–
and
it
is
not
a
problem
that
can
be
solved
by
Cambodia
alone.
Cambodia
already
has
memoranda
of
understanding
with
the
governments
of
Thailand
and
Vietnam.
It
is
a
member
of
the
COMMIT
Process,
which
seeks
to
coordinate
government
anti‐trafDicking
measures
across
the
region.
These
efforts
are
to
be
commended.
However,
we
need
to
see
the
bilateral
and
regional
agreements
that
Cambodia
has
undertaken
not
as
solutions
in
themselves,
but
as
starting
points
for
real
and
practical
collaboration
to
Dight
trafDicking.
Cambodia
must
ensure
that
foreign
support
does
not
end
at
the
Cambodian
border.
Victims
should
have
access
to
legal
remedies
in
foreign
jurisdictions,
and
the
help
of
foreign
law
enforcers
is
needed
to
secure
convictions
for
cross‐border
trafDickers.
Conclusion
This
is
only
a
brief
overview
of
the
challenges
that
we
face
in
Dighting
human
trafDicking
in
Cambodia.
The
new
trafDicking
law
is
an
important
step
and
we
must
ensure
that
it
is
used
to
its
full
effect.
Thank you.