You are on page 1of 25

ACEC J.O. No.

: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Cal No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
CALCULATION COVER SHEET Revision No.: 00
Page: 1 of 9
Client : HADEED/SABIC
Project : REPLACEMENT OF INERT GAS GENERATION SYSTEM
Location : Al-Jubail, Saudi Arabia

CALCULATION TITLE:
POWER SYSTEM STUDY – HADEED
(LOAD FLOW STUDY)

CALCULATION OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to verify the adequacy of the existing electrical equipment in the HADEED DR Plant –Main
Substation after replacing the existing Inert Gas Compressor pumps with higher rating and re-assess the electrical system
in accordance with SABIC requirements.

INPUTS:

See attached Electrical One Line Diagrams shown in Appendix-2

ASSUMPTIONS:

None.

ASSUMPTIONS REQUIRING CONFIRMATION:

None.

BASIS OF CALCULATION, METHOD, OR SOFTWARE TO BE USED:

1. Electrical Transient Analyzer Program ETAP PowerStation Release 12.5.0.


2. SABIC Standard, Power System and Equipment Design Calculations (E02-E01).
3. IEEE Std. 141, IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical Power Distribution for Industrial Plants.
4. IEEE Std. 399, IEEE Recommended Practice for Industrial and Commercial Power System Analysis.

CONCLUSION:
Based on ETAP Power System study results for Load Flow, the existing equipment at HADEED DR Plant
–Main Substation is not adequate to accommodate the new loads under AF-1421035. Refer to section
5.4.
However, there are some alerts exist on the received model which requires further investigation. Refer to sections.

Revision 00

Preparer / RSC
Date ‘09/02/17

Checker/ RPT
Date ‘09/02/17
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 2 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

REVISION RECORD

00 ‘09/02/17 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION RSC RPT

Rev. No. Date DESCRIPTION Pre’d By Chk By Cert By

REVISION NOTES:
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 3 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................................. 4
2.0 SCOPE OF POWER SYSTEM STUDY ........................................................................................... 4
3.0 APPLICABLE STANDARDS ........................................................................................................ 4
3.1 SABIC STANDARDS................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 INDUSTRY CODES AND STANDARDS .......................................................................................... 4
4.0 INPUT DATA AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 4
4.1 SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE ................................................................................................. 4
4.2 UTILITY GRID ........................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 ETAP ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL ................................................................................. 5
4.4 ETAP MODEL SCENARIOS SETTINGS........................................................................................ 5
5.0 LOAD FLOW STUDY ................................................................................................................. 7
5.1 LOAD FLOW STUDY OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................ 7
5.2 LOAD FLOW DESIGN ASSUMPTION ............................................................................................ 7
5.3 ETAP LOAD FLOW CASE STUDY CONFIGURATION..................................................................... 7
5.4 LOAD FLOW STUDY RESULTS, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ........................ 8
6.0 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................... 9
6.1 APPENDIX – 1 LOAD FLOW STUDY ETAP REPORT ..................................................................... 9
6.2 APPENDIX – 2 ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIAGRAMS ....................................................................... 9
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 4 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

1.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to verify the adequacy of the existing electrical equipment in the
HADEED DR Plant –Main Substation in accordance with SABIC requirements under AF-1421035,
Upgrade Inert Gas Generation system at HADEED Plant after replacing two (2) existing Compressor
pumps with new ones rated at 1350 kW.
These motors are connected on the 4.16kV Switchgear 3SG1-North Panel section as shown below:

Motor Tag
# Feeder no. Description Voltage Rating
no.

Inert Gas Compressor # 1 Pump


1 3FB112 42001-1 4 kV 1350 kW
Motor

Inert Gas Compressor # 2 Pump


2 3FB110 42001-2 4 kV 1350 kW
Motor

2.0 SCOPE OF POWER SYSTEM STUDY


The electrical system studies listed below were performed in accordance with the requirements
of the SABIC Standard E02-E01, Power System and Equipment Design Calculations:
• Load Flow Study

3.0 APPLICABLE STANDARDS

3.1 SABIC STANDARDS


3.1.1 E02-E01 : Power System and Equipment Design Calculations

3.2 INDUSTRY CODES AND STANDARDS

3.2.1 IEEE Std 141: IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical Power
Distribution for Industrial Plants.
3.2.2 IEEE Std 399: IEEE Recommended Practice for Industrial and Commercial
Power System Analysis

4.0 INPUT DATA AND METHODOLOGY

4.1 SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE


The computer software used to perform the system studies is ETAP (Electrical Transient
Analyzer Program) Power Station version 12.5.0. The IEC standard was used as the
basis for the power system study.

4.2 UTILITY GRID


Available fault level from utility is based on the received ETAP model and shown as
follows:
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 5 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

4.2.1 Maximum Fault Level @ SEC 230 KV:


Fault 3Ø = 12309 MVA, X/R = 12.73, kAsc = 30.9 kA
Fault 1Ø = 10082 MVA, X/R = 6.89, kAsc = 25.3 kA

4.2.2 Minimum Fault Level @ SEC 230 KV:


Fault 3Ø = 36650.019 MVA, X/R = 10, kAsc = 9.2 kA
Fault 1Ø = 2391.869 MVA, X/R = 5, kAsc = 6.0 kA

4.3 ETAP ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL

4.3.1 ETAP Model:


The existing HADEED ETAP model provided by the client was updated per
project requirements. The existing motors in Main Substation – DR Plant were
replaced by new motors as indicated on the referenced drawings shown in
Appendix-2.
4.4 ETAP MODEL SCENARIOS SETTINGS

“LF Normal”: Normal operating load, two transformers feed the whole
downstream loads with tie-breaker is open. Used for Load Flow Normal system
voltage study.

“LF Minimum”: Minimum operating load, assuming one transformer supplying


the entire load for secondary selective substations.

Below are scenarios parameters:

Table 4.4
Configuration Study Study Output
Scenario Study Case
Status Mode Type Report

LOAD
LF Normal Normal Operating Load Flow Normal-LF LF Normal
FLOW

LOAD
LF Minimum Minimum Operating Load Flow Minimum-LF LF Minimum
FLOW

4.4.1 Transformer Data


Existing transformer impedance values shown in the model are assumed to be
correct representing the actual transformer nameplate data and verified across
the referenced drawings/documents.
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 6 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

4.4.2 Circuit Breakers


All existing circuit breakers ratings shown in the existing model are assumed to
be correct representing the actual data and verified across the referenced
drawings/documents.

4.4.3 Switchgear and MCCs


All existing Switchgear and MCC continuous and short circuit current ratings
shown in the existing model are assumed to be correct representing the actual
data and verified across the referenced drawings/documents.

4.4.4 Cables
All main high voltage cables shown in the existing model are assumed to be
correct representing the actual cable data. New cables when modeled are taken
from ETAP cable library data.

4.4.5 Motor Loads


All existing motors shown in the existing model are assumed to be correct
representing the actual motor data. Motor loading for new motors (if any) are
assumed operating loads based on API 610 as shown below.
Motor HP Rating Loading
Less than 30 HP 80%
30 to 75 HP 87%
above 75 HP 91%

4.4.6 Static Loads


Existing static loads connected to Switchgear and MCC shown in the existing
model are assumed to be correct representing the actual operating load.

4.4.7 Lumped Loads


Existing lumped loads connected to Switchgear and MCC shown in the existing
model are assumed to be correct representing the actual operating load.

4.4.8 Plant Loading Category


Plant loading shown in the existing model are assumed to be correct representing
the actual data. New loads (if any) are configured in ETAP model based on the
following configuration and loading category shown in Table – 4.3.9 below:

Table – 4.3.9

ETAP LOADING CATEGORY


Load Description Efficiency & PF
Design Load Operating Load

Motor 100 (API) (ETAP Library)


Lighting/UPS 100 100 (ETAP Library)
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 7 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

Lumped Load 100 80 (ETAP Library)


Other / Static 100 90 (ETAP Library)

4.4.9 Demand Factor


Demand Factors for new additional loads (if any) will be assumed as listed below
in Table – 4.3.10:

Table – 4.3.10
Load Description Continuous (C) Intermittent (I) Spare (S)
Motor 100 30 0
Lighting/UPS 100 - -
Lumped/Static Load 100 30 0
Motors and static loads with a demand factor of “0” are considered “SPARE” and
not running for power system studies.

5.0 LOAD FLOW STUDY

5.1 LOAD FLOW STUDY OBJECTIVE


To evaluate the extent of loading and voltage drop or rise under Normal and Minimum
voltage condition for all busses and verify that all bus voltages and equipment loading are
within the acceptable limits.

5.2 LOAD FLOW DESIGN ASSUMPTION

Steady state voltage range, under all study conditions shall be as follows:
5.2.1 Allowable steady state Voltage drops shall be as listed below:
(a) Allowable Maximum Voltage Drop in the Switchgear, MCC and SWRK bus
is 3%.
(b) Allowable Maximum Voltage Drop in the branch circuit feeder is 3%.
(c) Allowable Maximum Voltage Drop is 5% (Total voltage drop for main,
feeders and branch circuit).
(d) Allowable Maximum Bus Over-voltage is 105% of nominal.
(e) Allowable Maximum Bus Under-voltage is 97% of nominal. Maximum 95%
at load terminal.

5.3 ETAP LOAD FLOW CASE STUDY CONFIGURATION

5.3.1 Normal System Voltage:


The Normal System Voltage of each circuit is calculated based on the Design
Operating Load, assuming the two (2) upstream transformers are operational and
the Tie-circuit breaker on the normal status for the secondary selective
substation.
Normal System Voltage ETAP Setting:
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 8 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

Scenario ID: “LF Normal”


Study Case ID: “LF-Normal”
Configuration Setting: “Normal ”
Revision Setting: “Base”
Output Report: “LF Norm”
The model was set to highlight voltages on bus sections that were below 95% and above
105% of the nominal voltages.

5.3.2 Minimum System Voltage:


The Minimum System Voltage of each circuit is calculated based on the operating
load, assuming one (1) transformer supplying the entire load and the Tie-circuit
breaker is closed for the secondary selective substations.

Minimum System Voltage ETAP Setting:


Scenario ID: “LF Minimum”
Study Case ID: “LF-Minimum”
Configuration Setting: “Minimum”
Revision Setting: “Base”
Loading Category: “Normal”
Output Report: “LF Min”
The model was set to highlight voltages on bus sections that were below 95%
and above 105% of the nominal voltages.

5.4 LOAD FLOW STUDY RESULTS, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION


The ETAP Load Flow report results for study scenarios “LF Normal” and “LF Minimum”
are shown in Appendix-1. Load Flow Normal and Minimum system voltage levels at Main
Substation – DR Plant under AF-1321035 are tabulated in Table-5.4 below:

Table-5.4: Load Flow Normal, and Minimum System Voltage Level @ Hadeed DR Plant –Main substation
Case Scenario Results - Case Scenario Results -
Calculated Total Bus load in Calculated System Voltage
Bus
Percentage (%V)
Area Bus ID Voltage
Bus Bus
kV LF-
loading- loading- LF-Normal
Minimum
Normal Minimum
3SG1-NORTH
PANEL SECTION 4.16 66.9 115.8 98.4 97.16
(3B1-BUS)
Main
3SG1-SOUTH
Substation
PANEL SECTION 4.16 53.5 52.1 98.51 97.16
– DR Plant
(3B2-BUS)
EMERGENCY BUS
4.16 12.0 12.1 98.4 97.16
-3BS113
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Page No.: 9 of 9
CONTINUATION SHEET

Based on the Table-5.4 above, the load flow calculations have determined the following:
• Bus voltages are within allowable limits as specified in the SABIC Engineering
Standard E02-E01, section 10.
• ETAP load flow reports show some equipment which has been critically and
marginally alerted with different conditions, such as overloading and under/over
voltage, initially by the received ETAP model and not due to the scope of work for
AF-1421035. These issues require further analysis for the overall ETAP model.
• The loading on the 4.16kV Switchgear 3SG1 buses is acceptable during normal
system voltage, i.e. normal condition. However, during minimum system voltage, i.e.
worst case, the main bus will be overloaded.
• Since the 4.16kV Switchgear 3SG1 might get overloaded during worst case scenario,
it is recommended to define a sequence of operation by the end user to address the
consequences and procedure during such condition.

6.0 APPENDICES

6.1 APPENDIX – 1 LOAD FLOW STUDY ETAP REPORT

6.2 APPENDIX – 2 ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIAGRAMS


ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: 00
CALCULATION
Appendix: 1
CONTINUATION SHEET

Appendix – 1

Load Flow Study ETAP Report


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 1
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

Bus Loading Summary Report

Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load

Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic


Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading

HV BUS 1 230.000 0 0.0 0.0

3SG1-NORTH PANEL 4.160 2500.0 0 0 0 -1.743 0 0 0 0 11.850 92.2 1671.5 66.9

3SG1-SOUTH PANEL 4.160 2500.0 1.029 0.438 0 -1.747 0 0 0 0 9.496 87.6 1337.8 53.5

Bus1 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.422 95.8 192.0

Bus2 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.422 95.8 192.0

Bus3 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.291 96.7 1592.3

Bus4 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.884 93.8 149.3

Bus5 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.884 93.8 149.3

Bus6 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.789 94.7 1238.0

Bus7 0.480 0.324 0.138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.352 92.0 437.6

Bus8 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus9 4.160 0.360 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.391 92.1 55.3

Bus10 4.160 1.294 0.527 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.397 92.6 198.8

Bus11 4.160 1.294 0.527 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.397 92.6 198.8

Bus12 4.160 0.554 0.232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.600 92.3 85.0

Bus13 4.160 4.948 1.929 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.310 93.2 755.8

Bus14 4.160 0.213 0.092 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.232 91.9 32.8

Bus15 4.160 0.360 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.391 92.1 55.4

Bus16 4.160 0.304 0.130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.331 92.0 46.8

Bus17 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus18 4.160 0.372 0.157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.403 92.1 57.0

Bus19 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus20 4.160 0.290 0.124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.315 92.0 44.7

Bus21 4.160 0.717 0.298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.777 92.4 109.5

Bus22 4.160 0.717 0.298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.777 92.4 109.5

Bus23 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus24 4.160 0.343 0.145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.372 92.1 52.8

BUS 481 0.480 3150.0 1.027 0.520 0.208 0.105 0 0 0 0 1.384 89.2 1850.1 58.7

BUS 482 0.480 3150.0 1.297 0.617 0.264 0.126 0 0 0 0 1.729 90.3 2305.0 73.2

BUS 483 0.480 3150.0 1.294 0.682 0.260 0.137 0 0 0 0 1.756 88.5 2357.2 74.8

BUS 484 0.480 3150.0 1.236 0.492 0.259 0.103 0 0 0 0 1.609 92.9 2114.5 67.1

BUS-485 0.220 800.0 0.050 0.031 0.012 0.007 0 0 0 0 0.072 85.0 194.6 24.3

EMER BUS 4.160 2500.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.120 89.0 299.1 12.0

HV BUS 2 230.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.473 95.4 28.8

HV BUS 3 230.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.920 93.4 22.4

MAIN S/S 2 BUS B 34.500 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.426 95.8 192.0 15.4


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 2
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load

Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic


Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading

MAIN S/S 2 BUS C 34.500 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.887 93.7 149.3 11.9

* Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus critical limit ( 100.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).

# Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus marginal limit ( 95.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 3
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

Branch Loading Summary Report

Transformer
CKT / Branch Cable & Reactor
Ampacity Loading Capability Loading (input) Loading (output)

ID Type (Amp) Amp % (MVA) MVA % MVA %

Cable1 Cable 883.39 191.99 21.73

Cable3 Cable 883.39 191.99 21.73

Cable5 Cable 4557.07 1592.25 34.94

Cable7 Cable 883.39 149.28 16.90

Cable9 Cable 883.39 149.28 16.90

Cable11 Cable 4462.03 1238.01 27.75

3FB22-T10 Transformer 0.750 0.358 47.8 0.352 47.0

23T1 Transformer 25.000 11.422 45.7 11.291 45.2

23T2 Transformer 25.000 8.884 35.5 8.789 35.2

34 T1 Transformer 1.600 1.515 94.7 1.384 86.5

34 T3 Transformer 2.000 1.931 96.5 1.756 87.8

34T2 Transformer 2.000 1.888 94.4 1.729 86.5

34T4 Transformer 2.000 1.730 86.5 1.609 80.4

35T1 Transformer 0.500 0.073 14.6 0.072 14.5

910AT02 Transformer 150.000 8.920 5.9 8.887 5.9

910AT04 Transformer 150.000 11.473 7.6 11.426 7.6

* Indicates a branch with operating load exceeding the branch capability.


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 4
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

Branch Losses Summary Report

Vd
CKT / Branch From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage
% Drop
ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag

Cable5 -10.921 -2.856 10.923 2.859 1.6 2.5 98.4 98.4 0.02

Cable16 1.306 0.529 -1.294 -0.527 11.9 2.2 98.4 97.6 0.83

Cable17 1.306 0.529 -1.294 -0.527 12.3 2.3 98.4 97.5 0.86

Cable18 0.557 0.232 -0.554 -0.232 2.7 0.5 98.4 98.0 0.44

Cable19 4.985 1.965 -4.948 -1.929 37.3 36.6 98.4 97.5 0.88

Cable20 0.214 0.092 -0.213 -0.092 0.6 0.1 98.4 98.1 0.25

Cable21 0.362 0.153 -0.360 -0.153 1.8 0.3 98.4 98.0 0.44

Cable22 0.306 0.130 -0.304 -0.130 1.1 0.2 98.4 98.1 0.33

Cable23 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 98.4 98.4 0.00

Cable11 -8.318 -2.834 8.319 2.835 0.9 1.5 98.5 98.5 0.02

Cable24 0.373 0.157 -0.372 -0.157 1.4 0.3 98.5 98.2 0.33

Cable25 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 98.5 98.5 0.00

Cable26 0.292 0.124 -0.290 -0.124 1.8 0.3 98.5 98.0 0.54

Cable27 0.718 0.298 -0.717 -0.298 0.4 0.4 98.5 98.4 0.06

Cable28 0.718 0.298 -0.717 -0.298 0.4 0.4 98.5 98.4 0.06

Cable29 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 98.5 98.5 0.00

Cable30 0.345 0.146 -0.343 -0.145 2.2 0.9 98.5 97.9 0.62

3FB22-T10 0.327 0.148 -0.324 -0.138 2.5 9.8 98.5 96.8 1.71

34 T1 1.264 0.835 -1.234 -0.625 29.7 210.5 98.5 90.0 8.56

34 T3 1.592 1.092 -1.554 -0.819 38.5 273.4 98.5 89.6 8.91

34T2 1.598 1.004 -1.562 -0.743 36.8 261.4 98.5 90.2 8.27

35T1 0.062 0.039 -0.061 -0.038 0.2 1.1 98.5 97.5 1.03

Cable1 -10.941 -3.280 10.944 3.285 3.0 5.6 99.6 99.6 0.04

Cable3 10.941 3.280 -10.941 -3.280 0.1 0.2 99.6 99.6 0.00

23T1 10.941 3.280 -10.923 -2.859 17.8 420.8 99.6 98.4 1.14

Cable7 -8.329 -3.090 8.331 3.093 1.8 3.4 99.6 99.6 0.03

Cable9 8.329 3.090 -8.329 -3.090 0.1 0.1 99.6 99.6 0.00

23T2 8.329 3.090 -8.319 -2.835 10.7 254.4 99.6 98.5 1.07

Cable12 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 98.4 98.4 0.00

Cable14 -0.360 -0.153 0.361 0.153 0.9 0.2 98.2 98.4 0.22

34T4 -1.494 -0.596 1.525 0.816 31.0 219.9 91.5 98.4 6.88

910AT04 10.947 3.433 -10.944 -3.285 3.5 147.4 100.0 99.6 0.41

910AT02 8.333 3.182 -8.331 -3.093 2.1 89.1 100.0 99.6 0.37

254.9 1945.6
ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 5
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

Alert Summary Report

% Alert Settings
Critical Marginal
Loading
Bus 100.0 95.0

Cable 100.0 95.0

Reactor 100.0 95.0

Line 100.0 95.0

Transformer 100.0 95.0

Panel 100.0 95.0

Protective Device 100.0 95.0

Generator 100.0 95.0

Inverter/Charger 100.0 95.0

Bus Voltage
OverVoltage 105.0 102.0

UnderVoltage 95.0 98.0

Generator Excitation
OverExcited (Q Max.) 100.0 95.0

UnderExcited (Q Min.) 100.0


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 6
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-NORMAL
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Normal

CASE # 1 - Normal Operation, 23T1 & 23T2 both in Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in Open position

SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION , LOADING & DEMAND

MW Mvar MVA % PF

Source (Swing Buses): 19.280 6.615 20.384 94.59 Lagging

Source (Non-Swing Buses): 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total Demand: 19.280 6.615 20.384 94.59 Lagging

Total Motor Load: 18.023 7.681 19.592 91.99 Lagging

Total Static Load: 1.002 -3.011 3.174 31.57 Leading

Total Constant I Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total Generic Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Apparent Losses: 0.255 1.946

System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000

Number of Iterations: 3
ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 1
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Bus Loading Summary Report

Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load

Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic


Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading

HV BUS 1 230.000 0 0.0 0.0

3SG1-NORTH PANEL 4.160 2500.0 0 0 0 -1.699 0 0 0 0 20.262 93.2 2894.3 115.8 *

3SG1-SOUTH PANEL 4.160 2500.0 1.029 0.438 0 -1.699 0 0 0 0 9.122 87.4 1303.0 52.1

Bus Tie B_C 34.500 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.100 93.8 169.7 13.6

Bus1 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.186 93.9 339.5

Bus2 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.186 93.9 339.5

Bus3 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.717 95.8 2815.5

Bus4 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus5 34.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus6 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus7 0.480 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus8 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus9 4.160 0.360 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.391 92.1 56.0

Bus10 4.160 1.294 0.527 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.397 92.6 201.3

Bus11 4.160 1.294 0.527 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.397 92.6 201.4

Bus12 4.160 0.554 0.232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.600 92.3 86.1

Bus13 4.160 4.948 1.929 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.310 93.2 765.6

Bus14 4.160 0.213 0.092 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.232 91.9 33.2

Bus15 4.160 0.360 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.391 92.1 56.1

Bus16 4.160 0.304 0.130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.331 92.0 47.4

Bus17 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus18 4.160 0.372 0.157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.403 92.1 57.8

Bus19 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus20 4.160 0.290 0.124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.315 92.0 45.3

Bus21 4.160 0.717 0.298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.777 92.4 111.0

Bus22 4.160 0.717 0.298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.777 92.4 111.0

Bus23 4.160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

Bus24 4.160 0.343 0.145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.372 92.1 53.5

BUS 481 0.480 3150.0 1.027 0.520 0.201 0.102 0 0 0 0 1.376 89.2 1870.5 59.4

BUS 482 0.480 3150.0 1.297 0.617 0.256 0.122 0 0 0 0 1.720 90.3 2330.2 74.0

BUS 483 0.480 3150.0 1.294 0.682 0.251 0.132 0 0 0 0 1.746 88.5 2383.4 75.7

BUS 484 0.480 3150.0 1.236 0.492 0.251 0.100 0 0 0 0 1.601 92.9 2134.7 67.8

BUS-485 0.220 800.0 0.050 0.031 0.011 0.007 0 0 0 0 0.072 85.0 196.3 24.5

EMER BUS 4.160 2500.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.115 88.9 302.1 12.1

HV BUS 2 230.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.143 93.5 25.5

HV BUS 3 230.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.143 93.5 25.5


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 2
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load

Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic


Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading

MAIN S/S 2 BUS B 34.500 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.201 93.8 339.5 27.2

MAIN S/S 2 BUS C 34.500 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.100 93.8 169.7 13.6

* Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus critical limit ( 100.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).

# Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus marginal limit ( 95.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 3
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Branch Loading Summary Report

Transformer
CKT / Branch Cable & Reactor
Ampacity Loading Capability Loading (input) Loading (output)

ID Type (Amp) Amp % (MVA) MVA % MVA %

Cable1 Cable 883.39 339.49 38.43

Cable3 Cable 883.39 339.49 38.43

Cable5 Cable 4557.07 2815.51 61.78

Cable7 Cable 883.39 0.00 0.00

Cable9 Cable 883.39 0.00 0.00

3FB22-T10 Transformer 0.750

23T1 Transformer 25.000 20.186 80.7 19.717 78.9

23T2 Transformer 25.000

34 T1 Transformer 1.600 1.511 94.4 1.376 86.0

34 T3 Transformer 2.000 1.925 96.3 1.746 87.3

34T2 Transformer 2.000 1.882 94.1 1.720 86.0

34T4 Transformer 2.000 1.724 86.2 1.601 80.0

35T1 Transformer 0.500 0.073 14.5 0.072 14.4

910AT02 Transformer 150.000 10.143 6.8 10.100 6.7

910AT04 Transformer 150.000 10.143 6.8 10.100 6.7

* Indicates a branch with operating load exceeding the branch capability.


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 4
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Branch Losses Summary Report

Vd
CKT / Branch From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage
% Drop
ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag

Cable5 -18.886 -5.641 18.891 5.648 4.8 7.8 97.2 97.2 0.03

Cable16 1.306 0.529 -1.294 -0.527 12.2 2.2 97.2 96.3 0.84

Cable17 1.307 0.530 -1.294 -0.527 12.7 2.3 97.2 96.3 0.87

Cable18 0.557 0.232 -0.554 -0.232 2.8 0.5 97.2 96.7 0.44

Cable19 4.986 1.966 -4.948 -1.929 38.3 37.5 97.2 96.3 0.89

Cable20 0.214 0.092 -0.213 -0.092 0.6 0.1 97.2 96.9 0.25

Cable21 0.362 0.153 -0.360 -0.153 1.8 0.3 97.2 96.7 0.44

Cable22 0.306 0.130 -0.304 -0.130 1.2 0.2 97.2 96.8 0.34

Cable23 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 97.2 97.2 0.00

Cable24 0.373 0.157 -0.372 -0.157 1.4 0.3 97.2 96.8 0.34

Cable25 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 97.2 97.2 0.00

Cable26 0.292 0.124 -0.290 -0.124 1.8 0.3 97.2 96.6 0.55

Cable27 0.718 0.298 -0.717 -0.298 0.4 0.4 97.2 97.1 0.07

Cable28 0.718 0.298 -0.717 -0.298 0.4 0.4 97.2 97.1 0.07

Cable29 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 97.2 97.2 0.00

Cable30 0.345 0.146 -0.343 -0.145 2.2 1.0 97.2 96.5 0.63

3FB22-T10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 97.2 97.2 0.00

34 T1 1.258 0.837 -1.228 -0.622 30.3 215.1 97.2 88.5 8.67

34 T3 1.584 1.094 -1.545 -0.814 39.4 279.5 97.2 88.1 9.02

34T2 1.591 1.006 -1.553 -0.739 37.6 267.1 97.2 88.8 8.38

35T1 0.061 0.039 -0.061 -0.038 0.2 1.1 97.2 96.1 1.04

Cable1 -18.946 -6.965 18.956 6.982 9.2 17.6 99.5 99.6 0.07

Cable3 18.946 6.965 -18.946 -6.964 0.3 0.5 99.5 99.5 0.00

23T1 18.946 6.964 -18.891 -5.648 55.5 1315.8 99.5 97.2 2.31

Cable7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 99.6 99.6 0.00

Cable9 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 99.6 99.6 0.00

23T2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 99.6 99.6

Cable12 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 97.2 97.2 0.00

Cable14 -0.360 -0.153 0.361 0.153 0.9 0.2 96.9 97.2 0.22

34T4 -1.487 -0.593 1.519 0.817 31.6 224.2 90.2 97.2 6.96

910AT04 9.481 3.606 -9.478 -3.491 2.7 115.2 100.0 99.6 0.42

910AT02 9.481 3.606 -9.478 -3.491 2.7 115.2 100.0 99.6 0.42

291.1 2604.8
ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 5
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Alert Summary Report

% Alert Settings
Critical Marginal
Loading
Bus 100.0 95.0

Cable 100.0 95.0

Reactor 100.0 95.0

Line 100.0 95.0

Transformer 100.0 95.0

Panel 100.0 95.0

Protective Device 100.0 95.0

Generator 100.0 95.0

Inverter/Charger 100.0 95.0

Bus Voltage
OverVoltage 105.0 102.0

UnderVoltage 95.0 98.0

Generator Excitation
OverExcited (Q Max.) 100.0 95.0

UnderExcited (Q Min.) 100.0

Critical Report

Device ID Type Condition Rating/Limit Unit Operating % Operating Phase Type

3CB1 HV CB Overload 2500.000 Amp 2815.510 112.6 3-Phase

3SG1-NORTH PANEL Bus Overload 2500.000 Amp 2894.328 115.8 3-Phase

BUS 481 Bus Under Voltage 0.480 kV 0.425 88.5 3-Phase

BUS 482 Bus Under Voltage 0.480 kV 0.426 88.8 3-Phase

BUS 483 Bus Under Voltage 0.480 kV 0.423 88.1 3-Phase

BUS 484 Bus Under Voltage 0.480 kV 0.433 90.2 3-Phase

Marginal Report

Device ID Type Condition Rating/Limit Unit Operating % Operating Phase Type

3SG1-NORTH PANEL Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

3SG1-SOUTH PANEL Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

Bus10 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.007 96.3 3-Phase

Bus11 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.006 96.3 3-Phase

Bus12 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.023 96.7 3-Phase


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 6
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

Marginal Report

Device ID Type Condition Rating/Limit Unit Operating % Operating Phase Type

Bus13 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.005 96.3 3-Phase

Bus14 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.031 96.9 3-Phase

Bus15 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.023 96.7 3-Phase

Bus16 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.028 96.8 3-Phase

Bus17 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

Bus18 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.028 96.8 3-Phase

Bus19 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

Bus20 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.019 96.6 3-Phase

Bus21 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.039 97.1 3-Phase

Bus22 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.039 97.1 3-Phase

Bus23 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

Bus24 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.016 96.5 3-Phase

Bus3 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.043 97.2 3-Phase

BUS-485 Bus Under Voltage 0.220 kV 0.211 96.1 3-Phase

Bus7 Bus Under Voltage 0.480 kV 0.466 97.2 3-Phase

Bus8 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase

Bus9 Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.033 96.9 3-Phase

EMER BUS Bus Under Voltage 4.160 kV 4.042 97.2 3-Phase


ETAP
Project: HADEED - ETAP STUDIES Page: 7
12.5.0C
Location: JUBAIL, KSA Date: 08-23-2016
Contract: SN: ARABIANCEC
Engineer: EATON Revision: Base
Study Case: LF-MINIMUM
Filename: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA Config.: Minimum

CASE # 2 - Minimum Operation, 23T1 in service & 23T2 out of Service, 4.16kV Bus tie (3TB12) in closed position

SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION , LOADING & DEMAND

MW Mvar MVA % PF

Source (Swing Buses): 18.961 7.213 20.287 93.47 Lagging

Source (Non-Swing Buses): 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total Demand: 18.961 7.213 20.287 93.47 Lagging

Total Motor Load: 17.699 7.543 19.240 91.99 Lagging

Total Static Load: 0.971 -2.935 3.092 31.40 Leading

Total Constant I Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total Generic Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Apparent Losses: 0.291 2.605

System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000

Number of Iterations: 3
ACEC J.O. No.: 1792
ARABIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING CENTRE CO.
Calculation No.: CALC-E-004
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia Revision No.: B
CALCULATION
Appendix: 2
CONTINUATION SHEET

Appendix – 2

Electrical One Line Diagrams


One-Line Diagram - OLV1 (Load Flow Analysis)
SEC UTILITY-B (MAX) SEC UTILITY-B4 (MIN) SEC UTILITY-C (MAX) SEC UTILITY-C (MIN)
12309 MVAsc 3665.019 MVAsc 12309 MVAsc 3665.019 MVAsc

SEC UTILITY-A (MAX) SEC UTILITY-A (MIN)


12309 MVAsc 3665.019 MVAsc

10143 kVA 0 kVA 10143 kVA


25.5 A 0 A 25.5 A
HV BUS 2 93.5% PF % HV BUS 1 0.0% PF 93.5% PF
230 kV 100 100% HV BUS 3 100%
10143 kVA 230 kV 230 kV 10143 kVA
25.5 A 25.5 A
93.5% PF 93.5% PF
910AT04 910AT08 910AT02
150 MVA 150 MVA 150 MVA

o
R
R

MAIN S/S 2 BUS B Bus Tie B_C MAIN S/S 2 BUS C


% % %
34.5 kV 99.58 34.5 kV 99.58 34.5 kV 99.58
20201 kVA 10100 kVA 10100 kVA 0.0% PF
339.5 A 169.7 A 169.7 A
93.8% PF 93.8% PF 93.8% PF

o o

o
o
R
R

R
R
o

Cable1 Cable7

Cable3 Cable9
R 87

23T1 23T2
25 MVA 25 MVA

Cable5 Cable11

o o

R R

o o

Open

6%
97.1 6%
97.1
o

R
6% 2115 kVA 19710 kVA 8427 kVA 3SG1-SOUTH PANEL
EMER BUS 97.1 302.1 A 2815.5 A 3SG1-NORTH PANEL 1203.7 A
4.16 kV 88.9% PF 95.8% PF 4.16 kV 94.6% PF 4.16 kV
1724 kVA 0.0% PF 392 kVA 1409 kVA 1410 kVA 603 kVA 5360 kVA 1699 kVA 232 kVA 393 kVA 332 kVA 0.0% PF 471 kVA 0.0% PF 405 kVA 0.0% PF 1511 kVA 317 kVA 138 kVA 138 kVA 1699 kVA 777 kVA 1882 kVA 777 kVA 0.0% PF 372 kVA 1925 kVA 375 kVA 73 kVA
246.3 A 56 A 201.3 A 201.4 A 86.1 A 765.6 A 242.7 A 33.2 A 56.1 A 47.4 A 67.3 A 57.8 A 215.8 A 45.3 A 19.7 A 19.7 A 242.7 A 111 A 268.9 A 111 A 53.2 A 275 A 53.5 A 10.4 A
88.1% PF 92.1% PF 92.7% PF 92.7% PF 92.3% PF 93.0% PF 0.0% PF 91.9% PF 92.1% PF 92.0% PF 92.2% PF 92.1% PF 83.3% PF 92.0% PF 91.7% PF 91.7% PF 0.0% PF 92.4% PF 84.5% PF 92.4% PF 92.1% PF 82.3% PF 92.1% PF 84.4% PF

o o
o
R R
o
R
o o
R o
R R
o o o
R
R o
R R o
o
34 T3 35T1
34T4 R o o
o
R
R o
o

0.8 MVA R R o o
R 0.8 MVA o 0.2 MVA
o
R R
o
R R R
o
R
R o
34 T1 o o

3PFC17 R
Cable12 o o
R R R
R 1800 kvar R 3FB22-T10 0.64 MVA
o

Cable14 R
0.75 MVA
Cable29 Cable30

391 kVA Cable28


56 A Cable27 STOCKPILE CON#2
AIR COMP#2 Cable16 Cable22
92.1% PF Cable26 355 kW
BUS 484 373 kW 1397 kVA Cable20 331 kVA Cable24 0.48 kV
0.48 kV 90.2% 201.3 A
Cable17 47.4 A BUS-485 2%
92.6% PF Cable18 92.0% PF 403 kVA BUS 481 315 kVA 96.1
1601 kVA 232 kVA % 45.3 A BOOM STACKER#1 3PFC210 0.22 kV
2134.7 A
AIR COMP#1 1397 kVA 33.2 A BUFFER BIN FIRE PUMP
57.8 A 88.49 92.0% PF 130 kW
BOOM STACKER#2
1800 kvar 777 kVA STOCKPILE CON#1
BUS 483
372 kVA
72 kVA
373 kW 201.4 A 92.1% PF 130 kW 777 kVA 196.3 A
92.9% PF 91.9% PF RECYCLE GAS PUMP#1 450 kW 450 HP LEAN SOL PUMP#1 654 kVA 723 kVA 111 A 355 kW 8.14%
0.48 8kV 53.5 A
92.6% PF Cable19 315 kW Cable23 111 A 85.0% PF
GAS HEATER FORCED 385 kW 888.6 A 982.5 A 92.4% PF 92.4% PF 876 kVA 870 kVA 92.1% PF
220 kW Cable25 88.0% PF90.3% PF 1196 A 1187.4 A
5310 kVA Cable21 88.5% PF 88.4% PF
600 kVA 765.6 A EQP COOL WATER PUMP#1
86.1 A 93.2% PF EQ COOL WATER PUMP#3
391 kVA SCREEN STATION 746 kW 746 kW B CONVERYOR
92.3% PF 300 kW EQ COOL WATER PUMP#2
RECYCLE GAS COMP 56.1 A RECYCLE GAS PUMP#2 746 kW 355 kW
other Spare 5200 kW 92.1% PF LEAN SOL PUMP#2 34T2
4.MCC08 315 kW 385 kW 0.8 MVA LUMP 35T1
998 kVA
1663 kVA GAS HEATER INDUCED 73 kVA
COOL GAS COMP 373 kW
575 kW

4.MCC6 4.MCC5
840 kVA
759 kVA
4MCC3 4MCC2
1019 kVA 1012 kVA

BUS 482 8%
88.7
0.48 kV
593 kVA 720 kVA 409 kVA
802.8 A 976.1 A 554.5 A
89.0% PF 92.7% PF87.4% PF

INERT GAS COMP#1


1350 kW
INERT GAS COMP#2
1350 kW

AF-1421035 SCOPE OF WORK

4MCC4 4MCC1
4MCC7
688 kVA 836 kVA 475 kVA

page 1 14:59:32 Aug 23, 2016 Project File: HADEED - JUBAIL KSA

You might also like