RENE GUENON
TRADITIONAL FORMS
AND COSMIC CYCLES
‘Translator
Henry D. Fohr
Editor
Samuel D. Fohr
SOPHIA PERENNIS
HILLSDALE NYCONTENTS
Editorial Note xu
Foreword xvi
PARTI
Some Remarks on the Doctrine of Cosmic Cycles 1
Reviews 8
PART I
Atlantis and Hyperborea 15
‘The Place of the Atlantean Tradition in the Manvantara 23
‘A Few Remarks on the Name Adam 29
Kabbalah 33
Kabbalah and The Science of Numbers 38
La Kabbale juive of Paul Vulliaud «7
The Siphra di-Tzeniutha 64
Reviews 68
Part iv
The Hermetic Tradition 73
Hermes 79
Hermes’ Tomb 86
Reviews. 93
List of Original Sources 109
Index un1
SOME REMARKS
ON THE DOCTRINE
OF COSMIC CYCLES
We HAVE OPTEN BEEN ASKED, regarding allusions we have been
led to make here and there to the Hindu doctrine of cosmic cycles
and its equivalents in other traditions, whether we might give, if not
a complete explanation, at least an overview sufficient to reveal its
broad outlines. In truth, this seems an almost impossible task, not
‘only because the question is very complex in itself, but especially
‘owing to the extreme difficulty of expressing these things in a Euro-
pean language and in a way that is intelligibe to the present-day
‘Western mentality, which has had no practice whatsoever with this,
kind of thinking. All that is really possible, in our opinion, isto try
to clarify a few points with remarks such as those that follow, which
can only raise suggestions about the meaning of the doctrine in
«question rather than to really explain it,
In the most general sense of the term, a cycle must be considered
as representing the process of development of some state of mani-
festation, or, in the case of minor cycles, of one of the more or less
restricted and specialized modalities of that state. Moreover, in vir-
tue of the law of correspondence which links all things in universal
Existence, there is necessarily and always a certain analogy, either
among different cycles of the same order or among the principal
cycles and their secondary divisions. This is what allows us to use
cone and the same mode of expression when speaking about them,
although this must often be understood only symbolically, for the
very essence of all symbolism is precisely founded on the analogies