Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 3
Are “in the money” options a form of fraud? No, they’re not.
Whistleblowers: some people as lawyers are obligated to do so, although
there’s no clear line on this.
IPO’s go on ways: they vary in time according to the economy. There are
season of purchasing shares.
Could there be a trend of keeping high number of transactions on
securities? Yes, because global markets are now “the thing”. The idea
would be that investor believe they’re going to get their money back.
Why do firms go public?
Life cycle theories: it is a cycle where you fid more diversified investors
whoy may pay a higher price, but also it involves costs. The cycle of a
company would be starting private and then, when ready, going public.
Two methods for the procedure of IPO’s: first commitment (the
underwriter will buy the securities in a lower price and resell them at the
real value), best efforts (not a commitment to buy, just the best effort to
do it as some kind of agent), dutch auction (an auction of the securities in
order to realize about the real price of the shares and be secure to be able
to sell them).
There`s a problem on underwriting costs: the fees are to high at least in
USA.
How do firms go public?
Book building: the bank chooses which investors are going to invite.
Investors invited submit indications of demand. Final price and
allocations of shares determined with an underpricing as reward for
participating in the process.
Reknown underwriters have the possibility to choose, not the opposite, as
they have to keep their reputation.
Registration statement: Allow to provide exact and accurate information
for the possible investors, in order to protect their inversion.
Lecture 7
Why cross line in different markets? 1) Bonding;
Depository receipt: represents a given number of underling shares of
foreign firms and enabling it to list in the US.
o Should be perfectly arbitraged with the price on local market.
Lecture 8
Info about the exam
Season offerings as oppose to IPO’S.
Moral hazard information problems
Do we really need that kind of restrictions any longer, or we could just
transform the minimum requirements? Show trade offs and benefits for
the position you take during the exam; not limit just to explain the
possibilities.
Show the tension! Explain the argument of both sides and then choose
your options. ALWAYS COUNTER-ARGUMENT!!!
Categorize in an excel sheet: ex. Institutional investors,
Disclosure, shareholders, remedies, 10b-5, ipo’s,
1) Issues spoting: for example, explain who can sue and also how’s
excluded
2) Standar: put the minor rule and the elements for such exclusion
3) Then the facts
4) Balance: why if fits or it doesn’t
Think outside the box!!!