Professional Documents
Culture Documents
can help students compare their own performance with the ideal one and to
especially indirect feedback. The indirect feedback will give good impact of the
improvement toward the students’ writing itself not only in the short time but also
in a long time of their life. The researcher thinks that indirect feedback is more
durable, but it will keep only in mind of receiver and the feedback can lost in
certain time. In contrast, the thought and comment in indirect feedback will be
Furthermore, Ellis (1984) notes that direct method is just low level
correction and not real feedback. According to Hendrickson (1984), the purpose
errors. Direct feedback means not only to indicate the location of errors, but also
to suggest correct forms. If the students is only provided with direct feedback on
their final drafts, they do not have an opportunity to reflect and correct their
writing become the correct one by themselves. They only follow the errors
Kendari, the researcher got a fact about the performance of teaching writing in
SMP Negeri 2 Kendari. In this class, the students had problem in writing a text
because they learnt writing without using a good approach and treatment. They
were just asked to write a composition based on the picture or topic that had been
3
writing. The students did not understand about certain instruction of text like the
generic structure of the text, purposes and the language feature of the text. The
students also did not really know how to correct their own writing because they
had gotten the correct answer from their mistakes, but most of the corrections only
They also could not evaluate their own writing because they have not
trained to do so, because the teacher had not had a good approach or strategy to
make their writing better. Using teacher’s indirect feedback might be a starting
point to start the improvement for students’ ability in writing since the evaluation
on writing process in classroom should be started by the teacher first, then it can
got that most of them had problem to compose writing in a good organization and
language use. They seldom practiced writing. The English instruction was focused
more on reading and exercises. While in writing, they just asked to summarize the
text according to the answer from the task before or asked them to write according
to the given of sequence of pictures. In addition, most of the students said that
they did not like writing even in Indonesian because it was very difficult. Finally,
in writing activity, the students never expressed their idea using systematic stages
The students usually just asked to write a text directly based on the topic
given, without knowing the stages how to write well. The teacher did not explain
to them about the best stages that should be done to compose a good writing. They
also did not know the basic information about the text that they will write, such as
generic structure, language feature, and the purpose of the text. The student
reorientation/conclusion of the text. The teacher also did not give brainstorming to
the students how to make ideas and arrange it in a good paragraph, so the students
couldn’t develop words, sentences and ideas to write as much as possible about
the topic.
strategy to solve those problems. The students also can improve their writing
ability through the teacher’s indirect feedback before being able to correct the
mistakes by themselves.
under the title “Improving Students Writing Ability through Teachers’ Indirect
Kendari?”
5
- For students, the students are hoped to be able to correct their own writing
independently.
same research.
1.6 Hypothesis
The researcher formulates the hypothesis in this study is “If the teacher