You are on page 1of 4

A VIEW of the AUGUST 25, 2017

SIMULTANEOUS SURPRISE TERRORIST ATTACKS,


in RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR -
WHAT A PROPORTIONATE ATTACK IN THE U.S.
WOULD LOOK LIKE
by Rick Heizman, January 8, 2019

Most people around the world - I would say especially in USA and Canada where there has
been no war on the ground in living memory, as well as western Europe, where almost
everybody was born after WWII - cannot fathom what it is like to experience these sort of
devastating attacks and sudden all-out war, by Islamic terrorists with planned genocidal
intent.

The following scenario is proportionate to the U.S. The population of the U.S. is about 6
times greater than in Myanmar (population of Myanmar = about 50 million). The land mass of
the entire US is about 15 times that of Myanmar (261,000 sq miles).

On August 25, 2017, in the early AM darkness, systematically planned, coordinated surprise
attacks were launched simultaneously on 30 Border Guard Police and Army bases, as well
as 40 - 60 villages, by a total number of 5000 - 10,000 assailants. The stated goal of the
militants was to kill every single non-Muslim, or ethnically cleanse them from the land, and to
declare the land an autonomous Islamic State, for Muslims only. It was Asia’s largest terrorist
attack in history, and for that matter in the world, considering the number of targets, and the
number of assailants involved. There were more than 50,000 Buddhists, Hindus, and ethnic
tribal minorities fleeing and hiding, or trapped in villages cut off from escape by Muslim-
planted land mines and blown-up bridges. The Army was outnumbered and overwhelmed
with rescuing and escorting villagers to safety, emergency medical needs, bringing in food
supplies, clearing roads of Muslim-laid landmines, fixing bridges in order to rescue villagers,
and chasing, capturing, and killing the Islamic terrorists.

1
SCENARIO - IF THIS HAPPENED IN THE USA

• Early one morning, starting at 2 AM, 180 police stations in 180 towns and cities, between
the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco and the Oregon border, were simultaneously
attacked, by surprise, as well as about 300 towns were assaulted by at least 50,000
assailants, with hundreds killed as they tried to flee in the predawn darkness.

• The area of the attacks was about 350 miles long and 250 miles wide, mostly rural small
towns, a few small cities, and no big cities.

• In at least 6 towns the entire population was herded together in the middle of the town,
tied together, blindfolded, and forced to march to pre-dug pits in the ground, and then
savagely executed and dumped into the pits - every single man, women, child, baby, and
elder - about 600 people total.

• At least 100 towns of non-Muslims were burned to the ground.

• As morning came, and the nation was starting to fathom this unprecedented and
unexpected massive attack against the police stations and the innocent non-Muslims, all
police and military started to respond to this unfolding disaster.

• The police and military were vastly outnumbered by the estimated 50,000 assailants.

• As police and military began to enter the attack zone they were ambushed, shot at, and
had vehicles blown-up by Muslim-laid landmines. They were stopped by over 100 blown-
up bridges over monsoon-laden raging creeks and rivers.

• Whole communities were trapped and pleading for rescue, in many cases for a week or
two.There were fresh attacks every day for the first two weeks.

• The stated goal of the militants was to kill every single non-Muslim, or ethnically cleanse
them from the land, and to declare the land an autonomous Islamic State, for Muslims
only.

• The militants, and the Imams from the mosques stated the goal again and again. They
wanted an Islamic State - an apartheid state where non-Muslims were forbidden, ruled by
Sharia Law, where there would be no women rights, there would be death for
homosexuals, leaving Islam, or ‘insulting’ Islam or Muhammad. There would be no
democracy, no diversity, and no multiculturalism.

• There were an estimated 300,000 - 500,000 internally displaced people seeking shelter (in
the middle of monsoon season), safety, food, clothing, money, and other essentials.

• As the Islamic terrorists failed in their attempts to kill all the police in the police stations,
seize all the weaponry, and use that weaponry to exterminate all the non-Muslims, the
Imams of the mosques, and the militant leaders ordered them to burn their own towns and
flee to a neighboring country and to attack any non-Muslims they encounter on the way.

2
• The Army had to pursue and eliminate the terrorist threat. The militants did not wear
uniforms, and easily melted back into their towns, where they had, essentially, total
support.

• As the military would enter an enemy town they were often ambushed, and had to
respond to gunfire from militants hiding behind their own women and children - which is
quite common among Islamic terrorists.

• Strangely, world opinion was seemingly taking the side of the terrorists and blaming the
military for a ‘harsh response’!

• The UN, being typically UN-able to see the reality, UN-willing to hear the voices of the true
victims, UN-fair and UN-intelligent about the whole issue, UN-ending in its false
accusations, and UN-fortunate and UN-friendly in its portrayal of the non-Muslim victims
of the UN-justifiable genocidal intended attacks.

• The terrorists identified themselves as ‘Native Californians’ - a term they claimed that they
have been called for centuries, even though the is no reference to that term in any
publication, in any language, in any part of history. Using that term is seen by the rest of
the nation to be a sinister ploy to appear indigenous.

• The terrorists confused and fooled much of the world by claiming to be indigenous to the
land despite the fact that most of them do not speak the national language of English, nor
any other language of the land. While a small number of them existed as a minority in
previous times, there were a number of other minorities, and they were one minority of
many - as in nearly any part of the world, in any era.

• It is well documented that the overwhelming majority of them came illegally, and that they
largely detested the non-Muslims and have set out to seize the land from them, and to
expel or kill all the non-Muslims.

HOW WOULD THE U.S. OR OTHER COUNTRIES RESPOND TO A SIMILAR


CRISIS?
The armed forces of ANY country, attacked like this, by terrorists who have always wanted to
break off a piece of the country for themselves, because of their inbred hatred and
intolerance for all non-Muslims, has to respond with decisive and overwhelming force, and to
eliminate the terrorists to the point where it will not happen again.

I am NOT saying: therefore the Army should kill all Muslims they see - but, fighting Islamic
terrorists is not easy in the least, and there will be civilian casualties because Muslims largely
don’t think about life and death the way that all non-Muslims think. The militants and Imams
are so brainwashed by the violent ideology of Islam that they can willing use women and
children as targets or bait, and then scream and accuse when those women and children are
killed or wounded. When this sort of incident happens the blame must be put on those who
should be blamed - the terrorists.

3
Anyone knows (or should know) that if you attack police or army you should expect a very
strong and decisive response, and likewise, if you attack innocent villagers intending to
slaughter them all, burn their homes, and loot their possessions you should expect to be
killed or captured. But, these kind of terrorists will do all of that AND scream - and demand
citizenship! No country in the world gives citizenship to people who actively fight against that
country and want to break off a piece of the nation. Any citizenship to these sort of Muslims
would be used for these means - to create their own land where only Muslims could be
citizens!

On October 9, 2016 - only 10 months before the August 25, 2017 attacks - there were
coordinated attacks against 3 Border Guard Police bases. Fighting went on for 6 weeks. The
Army responded (some people, reflexively, would say disproportionately responded), but, I
would say not decisively enough.

WHAT DO YOU THINK THE RESPONSE OF THE BANGLADESH OR


PAKISTAN OR INDONESIAN ARMY WOULD BE IF A MINORITY OF
BUDDHISTS STAGE SUCH MASSIVE ATTACKS AGAINST THE POLICE,
ARMY, AND MUSLIM CITIZENS OF THOSE COUNTRIES?
I don’t think there would be any disagreement if I say that the response would be so severe
that virtually every single Buddhist, from young to old, would perish, many in the most
horrible ways, and that every Buddhist building, shrine, temple, monastery, pagoda, home
and village would be reduced to dust.

by Rick Heizman, January 8, 2019, San Francisco