CONCLUSION GUY LETRA
vapate Millenniwm Park with the leading 0
¢ Park with the leading in the Uni
thetfollywood Bowlin Los Angeles; Merriweather
wr eroncle formerly Concord) Music Pavilion outside San Francisco, th
North Carolina; the N
Riverbend Music Center in Cincinnati the Blossom
neat Detroit the
rand; and the Ravinia Festival north of Chic
svar and supedative acoustics as wll ase Jay Pritzker Pavilion, None neorPo
tes public art witha distinctive urbanism like Millenia Park
bout culture, art, and urban spaceatthe mi
jut what does Millennium Park reveal
sean? More precisely, whatiethe relationship ofpublic art, pat phniepy and
in urban cultural development at th
1 hybrid, vivid il
state patronage 'e onset ofthe twenty-first cent
ist, Millennium Park is a cultura
ies, and globalization, As a cultral
Jonship of art, corporate sponsorship, urban poli
ark embodies no singular theme
ve, Millennium Park presents £1
nthe early twen:
landscape, the pi
Like much “global”
art in the postindustral ag kip
es the ceria of beaux arts works
ockefellet Center (0
even paradoxical, messages. I ac
tieth century or landmark private
the dhame “New Eronters and the March of CHIRON
Aeiicelts oro gresesacaitiy or oalenstor tnpids the traditional theme’ of
tmemoraive art. Moreover the a of MINDY, eschews modernism’s tendency
qo emphasize te ats’ singular Bh self-expression.
snenniucs pa offers socmtnind G07 ‘Mhrough the
i, garden, and seue reat to and en
the pavilion, bridge, foun
ue with he sutouning ST san
a reac servers Look into a sculpture, walk
water, liste! pass through athe art still.
privileges the indivi ‘like much of the mos
Free Inert Beare large extent, ll we
poor. “1e'scomleted PY
projects like R ganized around
park does not
use of sale and color,
gage in an archi
surroul nd lake, Bach component was de
tion from viewers. O1
‘apraiie landscape,
vdem movement),
ork is incomplete,
rectural dialo
signed to stimulate
into music
cor cross a bridge
‘uethe viewer, not the
believes Anish Ka
cit”
the person who is lookit9's training originates not in ee
b shion design. Plensa has said, “As an aris,
sm.” Indeed, each is acultural nomad ina sens, perpise,
{intrigued bythe chaos ofthe world. They haveal spent mye,
‘challenging waditional conceptions of artistic and architectural ine
alin exile,” Kapoor contends, “in a positive sense of cultural ambiguiy.»
‘This ambiguity relets their resistance ro formalism and efforts to classify ther ap
Plensa and Kapoor are sculptors who reject being defined solely as sculptors. «1am
‘painter who isa sculptor,” states Kapoor. Similarly, Plensa insists, “Ialso believe thaeon
‘occasion the form prevents us from seeing the content, ... that beauty does not ne
sarily ie in dhe form.” Gustafson dismisses claims that her organic forms ae rote i
formal textile designs; rather, her landscapes originate in abstract and emotional e.
periences, And Gehn’s resistance to traditional architectural form, for an architecure
inspired by sculpture, is adefining element of his work.*
‘This antagonism to traditional categories is reflected by the artists’ incl
‘employ so-called ordinary materials in their earlier works. Each experimented with
phernalia that was, at the time, conveniently at hand and considered cheap ot availa
atlow cost. Kapoor used patterned pigment and stone. Plensa designed with casi
considered to be a second-rate industrial material. Gehry's use of chain link, expo
pipe, and corrugated aluminum made him a controversial figure in the 1970s.Gehry, such artistic transgression was no accident, "When you sat ou yan
sxietoranarstith the Kind of world we're in, we react he states. The seu
often Moore and Barbara Hepworth, or the architec of Rank Loyd Wight
pud.inGehy’s opinion, “a kind of precious character to them.” But many artists inthe
jgetwentieth century rejected that vision, "he world was chaotic, and the word aval
‘sero mewas very cheap,” remembers Gehry. “The buildings I goto look at were very
expensive, cheap, and it was frustrating because I was trained to do fancy details and
sft” IFthe building process (indeed the creative process) generates hammer marks
1 chain link, why fight if? Why not embrace it? “If that’s what the cultute produces,
why aot ip it around and say, ‘okay, turn it into a virtue,” Influenced by artists ik Jas
perlohns and Robert Rauschenberg who employed *junk” in their art, Gehty moved in
diferent direction, “Itangered people,” he admit
rent, and even many post-World War Il urban development programs (inspired
planners like Robert Moses and Edward Logue) reflected: ion of a single plane’
architect, o artist. Quite the contrary with Millennium Park, The park wa planned” by
series of committees, informal negotiations with mayor Richard M. D: poles
ganizational talents of John Bryan and Ed Uhlir. The array of artist pla oe
lecentralized, evolving process. John Bryan later ackné wledged that pr
ium Park's design presented aesthetic challeny hae uld
nclusion of so many grand works by promi artists in stch close Dros"
produce a final product where “all the artists were screamint i ids," claimed
Tosome critics, they are. Millennium Park is peure garden o np
Bemstein ofthe New York Times. The crowds fli ar aenatans Pac 8
GiyChiago, made ta pleasant as any overcrowded ci br” Millen
more like attending a splashy Pop Art exhibit than es are d de
complained Jay Walljasper of the Project for Publie Spaces. "oN
he strange and shiny objects, but your soul feels a bit und seared |
Such criticisms were no surprise to architect Adri yen " 3
Grant Park was being transformed into “a sort of sculprus tribute somethint
While Smith sympathized with efforts by wealthy civic leader" 0 yar an
very important and meaningful to the city,” he nev = rt een ati
et would have been more successful ifthe various enh vs eye-catching bandst™ fe
throughout Grant Park, By placing a monumental sculPtUre>2” ore putintn
eh, all the BO
andan iregular bridge in one area, maintained S™
litte block ofthe park
Geccltceee amcor bow he phn 8 704 gon
Fenders those elements more powerfl. GTB PT TT gust a
amount ofpublicar, much oft created by some OFTHE RFE works
and vente centuries, Within a short walk of MED?