You are on page 1of 2

ART VII

1. TIJAM 30 Defensor-Santiago vs. Ramos (electoral protest rendered moot by assumption into
Senate)

2. TIJAM 82 "Fortun v. Arroyo - GR 190293, 20 March 2012 (power of Supreme Court

to inquire into factual basis for declaration of martial law and suspension of

the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus; rendered moot)"

JUDICIARY

1. TIJAM 27 "*SBMA v. COMELEC – 262 SCRA 492 [1996] (supra. Art. 6, Sec. 32; no

controversy when resolution is at proposal stage)"

2. TIJAM 77 *Republic v. Garcia – 527 SCRA 495 [2007] (modification of doctrine)

3. TIJAM 128 Planters v. Fertiphil – 548 SCRA 485 [2008] (supra.)

4. TIJAM 179 "Jelbert B. Galicto v. H.E. President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, III - GR 193978

, February 28, 2012 (Reiterates multiple cases. Liga ng mga Barangay v. City

Mayor of Manila, Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, Inc. v. Anti-

Terrorism Council, Concepcion v. Comelec, etc.)"

5. TIJA
*Gutierrez v. House of Representatives – GR 193459,
M
TIJAM 20 February 15, 2011
23
Nuñez v. Sandiganbayan – 111 SCRA 433 [1982] (creation of 0
*P
TIJAM 21 Sandiganbayan)
eople v.
*Lecaros v. Sandiganbayan – 128 SCRA 324 [1984] (crimes in Mateo –
TIJAM 22 relation to public offfice)* 433
SCRA
Cunanan v. Arceo – 242 SCRA 88 [1995] (averment of the 640
TIJAM 23 nature of the crime committed)

Binay v. Sandiganbayan – GR No. 120681-83 (October 1, 2ND TAB


TIJAM 24 1999)
6. TIJA
Mayor Layus v. Sandiganbayan – GR 134272, December 8, M
TIJAM 25 1999 *C
havez v.
TIJAM 26 Abbot v. Mapayo, GR 134102, July 6, 2000 JBC –
676
TIJAM 27 Baluyot v. Hulganza, GR 136374, February 9, 2000 SCRA
579
TIJAM 28 Garcia v. Ombudsman, GR 127710, February 16, 2000 [2012]
(interpr
TIJAM 29 Lapid v. CA, GR 142261, June 29, 2000
etation
of “a
TIJAM 30 Tirol v. COA, GR 133954, August 3, 2000
representative of Congress”)

7. TIJAM JRB Realty v. CA – 271 SCRA 229 [1997] (SEC findings)

Art. XI - Accou