Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract —The nonlinearities form the obstacles to control the McAvoy et al explained a general dynamic model of the
dynamic behavior of the neutralization process. In this paper pH neutralization [4] They derived a mathematical model
fuzzy logic controller is designed. The fuzzy control is developed from mass balances for species .Some studies have been made
for a pH neutralization. The controller was set up for a plant. (Buchholt [5] Wright and Kravaris [6], Shinskey [7], Jayadeva
The fuzzy controller can avoid linearity problems that occur in [8] and Kulkarni [9] on the dynamic model of the continous
the neutralization process. Thus the efficiency is improved using
this technique. This technique forms the optimized technique for stirred reactor (CSTR). They assumed perfect mixing, reaction
overcoming all non-linearities that occur in PH neutralization. at equilibrium, constant volume, and constant density.
The proposed fuzzy logic controller outperforms the usual PID The reaction invariant in modeling was proposed by
controllers.
Gustafsson and Waller [10]. Component balance simplifies the
Keywords— fuzzy logic, adaptive control, pH control, modeling procedure and acceptance as a standard method for
neutralization process. pH neutralization process.
Henson and Seborg [11] proposed the dynamic model
I. INT RODUCT ION using conservation equations. The model adds hydraulic
Advanced control techniques play a major role in day relationships for the tank outlet flows. Presumptions includes
today process in terms of complexity and quality of product. constant density and complete solubility of the ions involved.
So the industries are in need of efficient and flexible control
Artificial neural network is used because it out-performs
system. To satisfy the above constraints we need to go for
the nonlinear modeling pattern. Nahas et al [12] applied a
improved forms of control. The non linearity problems can be
rectified using fuzzy control. neural network controller to simulate CSTR pH neutralization
process. Pottmann and seborg[13] applied a neural network
The nonlinearities forms the obstacles to control the model predictive control algorthim to a pH neutralization
dynamic behavior of the neutralization process. The control process. Draeger et al[14] who applied ANN based dynamic
objectives of neutralization is to drive the system to a different matrix control to a pH neutralization reactor. The use of neural
pH despite the disturbance by manipulating the flow rate of networks in the internal model control IMC structure has been
titrating stream. [1] proposed and implanted by several work [15] and has been
implemented for the control of simulated process[16]. Various
Neutralization is a common practice in wastewater nonlinear control schemes has been surveyed by Doherty[17].
treatment and waste stabilization. If a waste stream is found to
be hazardous because of corrosives, neutralization is the In this paper fuzzy logic controller is designed. The fuzzy
primary treatment used. Moreover, neutralization is used as a control is developed for a pH neutralization. The controller
pre-treatment system before a variety of biological, chemical, was set up for a plant. The proposed fuzzy logic controller
and physical treatment processes. Since many chemical outperforms the usual PID controllers.
treatment processes, such as metal precipitation, coagulatio n, Proportional Controller
phosphorus precipitation, and water softening are pH
dependent, the pH of these processes is adjusted to achieve Its actuating output is proportional to the error:
maximum process efficiency. Furthermore, the pH of the
effluent wastewater from different industrial activities also (1)
requires adjustment prior to its discharge into receiving water
bodies.[2] where
It is assumed that the neutralization process reach K = the proportional gain of the controller.
c
equilibrium in water solution almost instantly. So, the reaction E(t) = the error.
rate terms can be ignored in process model which can be c = the controller’s bias signal (i.e., its actuating signal when E
s
simplified. Model using reaction invariants was proposed by
= 0 (at steady state)).
Gustafsson and Waller [3]
V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS Sci., Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 995-1005. (1991),
[10] Gustafsson, T. K. and Waller, K. V., “ Dynamic Modeling and Reaction
This paper presents a hybrid control (PID and fuzzy logic Invariant Control of pH”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 38, pp. 389. (1983),
controller) for pH neutralization pilot plant. It covers the entire [11] Gustafsson, T. K., Skrifvars, B. G., Sandstrom, K. V. and Waller, K. V.,
operating range and is more robust against the uncertain pH “ Modeling of pH for Control”, Ind. Eng. Chem., Res., Vol. 34, pp. 820.
value variation). It is noticed that proposed hybrid controller is (1995),
more stable as compared to the Fuzzy Logic controller. [12] Henson, M. A. and Dale, E. S., “ Adaptive Nonlinear Control of a pH
Process modelling approach adopted in this paper is based on Neutralization Process”, IEEE T ran. Cont. Sys. T ech., Vol. 2, No. 3, Aug.
(1994)
the Physico-chemical principles and fundamental laws. A
conventional mathematical modelling process is incorporated. [13] Nahas, E.P., Henson, M.A. and Seborg, D.E. (1992). Nonlinear Internal
Model Control Strategy for Neural Network Model, Comp. Chem. Eng.,
Practical tests are carried out on actual system to estimate Vol. 16, 1039- 1057.
manipulating variables which were not known before the [14 ] Pattmann, M. and Seborg, D.E. (1997). A Nonlinear Predictive Control
experiments. The design methodology presented in this paper Strategy Based on Radial Basis Function Models, Comp. Chem. Eng.,
is generally applicable to a pH neutralization plant, based on Vol. 21, 965- 980.
continuous steering tank reactor. The robustness of the Hybrid [15] Draeger, A., Engell, S. and Ranke, H. (1995). Model Predictive Control
controller depends upon the process variables i.e. Acid/Base Using Neural Networks”, IEEE Cont. Sys., Vol. 5, No.5, 66 61-66.
Flow rate control valve, pH value meter, flow transmitter and [16] Bhat, Nand McAvoy, T . J. (1990). Use of Neural Nets for Dynamic
concentration monitoring sensors as these instruments appear Modeling and Control of Chemical Process Systems, Comp. Chem.
Vol-17,573-584
as manipulating variables during controller design and
[17] Hunt, K.J. and Sbarbaro, D. (1991). Neural Networks for Nonlinear
implementation Internal Model Control, IEE Proc.-D., Vol. 138, No. 5, 431-438
In this paper, PID controller is applied for flow rate control of [1 .
acid and alkaline streams and a Fuzzy logic controller is used
to control the pH value.
REFERENCES