You are on page 1of 1

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision reforms – Basel III

Strengthens microprudential regulation and supervision, and adds a macroprudential overlay that includes capital buffers

Capital Liquidity

Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3

Global liquidity
Containing Risk management Market
Capital Risk coverage standards and supervisory
leverage and supervision discipline
monitoring

Quality and level of capital Revisions to the standardised approaches for A non-risk- Supplemental Pillar 2 Revised Pillar 3 The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
calculating based leverage requirements address disclosure requires banks to have sufficient
• Raising minimum common • credit risk; ratio including firm-wide governance requirements high-quality liquid assets to withstand
equity to 4.5% of risk- off-balance and risk management, a 30-day stressed funding scenario
• market risk; Consolidated
weighted assets, after sheet exposures including the risk of that is specified by supervisors.
• credit valuation adjustment risk; and and enhanced
deductions. is meant to off-balance sheet
framework, The longer-term, structural Net
• operational risk serve as a exposures and
• A capital conservation buffer covering all Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is
backstop to the securitisation activities,
comprising common equity of mean greater risk-sensitivity and comparability. the reforms to designed to address liquidity
risk-based sound compensation
2.5% of risk-weighted assets the Basel mismatches. It covers the entire
Constraints on using internal models aim to capital practices, valuation
brings the total common equity framework. balance sheet and provides incentives
reduce unwarranted variability in banks’ requirement. It practices, stress
standard to 7%. Constraints on Introduces a for banks to use stable sources of
calculations of risk-weighted assets. also helps testing, corporate
a bank’s discretionary dashboard of funding.
contain system- governance and
distributions will be imposed Counterparty credit risk banks’ key
wide build-up supervisory colleges. The Committee’s 2008 guidance
when it falls into the buffer More stringent requirements for measuring prudential
of leverage. Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk
All Banks

range. exposure; capital incentives to use central metrics.


Interest rate risk in Management and Supervision takes
counterparties for derivatives; a new the banking book
• A countercyclical buffer account of lessons learned during the
standardised approach; and higher capital for (IRRBB)
within a range of 0–2.5% crisis. It is based on a fundamental
inter-financial sector exposures. Extensive guidance on
comprising common equity will review of sound practices for
apply when credit growth is Securitisations expectations for a managing liquidity risk in banking
judged to result in an bank’s IRRBB organisations.
Reducing reliance on external ratings, simplifying
unacceptable build-up of management process:
and limiting the number of approaches for
enhanced disclosure Supervisory monitoring
systematic risk. calculating capital charges and increasing
requirements; stricter The liquidity framework includes a
requirements for riskier exposures. common set of intraday and longer-
Capital loss absorption at the threshold for
point of non-viability Capital requirements for exposures to central identifying outlier term monitoring metrics to assist
Allowing capital instruments to be counterparties (CCPs) and equity investments banks; updated supervisors in identifying and
written off or converted to in funds to ensure adequate capitalisation and standardised analysing liquidity risk trends at both
common shares if the bank is support a resilient financial system. approach. the bank and system-wide level.
judged to be non-viable. This will
reduce moral hazard by increasing A revised output floor, based on Basel III
the private sector’s contribution to standardised approaches, limits the regulatory
resolving future banking crises. capital benefits that a bank using internal models
can derive relative to the standardised
approaches. Large exposures

The Committee identifies global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) using a methodology that includes both quantitative indicators and qualitative elements. Large exposures regime established
to mitigate systemic risks arising
In addition to meeting the Basel III risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, G-SIBs must have higher loss absorbency capacity to reflect the greater
SIBs

from interlinkages across financial


risks that they pose to the financial system. The Committee also developed principles on the assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency
institutions and concentrated
requirement for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs).
exposures.

You might also like