You are on page 1of 59

Centre for Technology Management

UNIDO - Technology Foresight for Practitioners

Fast-start technology
roadmapping

Thursday 9th October 2003, 09:00 - 13:00

Dr Robert Phaal
Centre for Technology Management

Workshop aim

To provide:

• An introduction to the theory and practice


of technology roadmapping
Centre for Technology Management

Agenda
09:00 Overview
09:10 Technology roadmapping - principles & practice
10:30 Break
11:00 T-Plan ‘fast-start’ approach
11:20 Group activity - the bicycle of the future
12:30 Discussion - getting started
13:00 Review and close
Centre for Technology Management

Technology roadmapping -
principles & practice
Centre for Technology Management

Roadmapping - Planning for the Future


Time

Market M1 M2

P1 P2 P3
Product
P4

T1 T2
Technology
T3 T4

R&D RD 1 RD 2 RD 4 RD 6
programmes RD 3 RD 5

Capital investment / finance


Resources Supply chain
Staff / skills
Centre for Technology Management

Technology roadmapping process


• Facilitate the integration of new technology into the business
• Support for company strategy and planning processes
• Identify new business opportunities for exploiting technology
• Provide top level information on the technological direction of the
business
• Support communication and co-operation within the business
• Identify gaps in market and technical knowledge
• Support sourcing decisions, resource allocation, risk management
and exploitation decisions
• High-level integrated planning and control
- a common reference / framework
Centre for Technology Management

Time is a key dimension…


prediction / investment
Short term Medium term Long term
Uncertainty / risk of

New (?):
- Markets
- Products
- Technologies
- Capabilities
- Organisational structures
- Distribution channels
- Competition

Time
Operations Innovation Strategy

What to manufacture? Which products? Which technologies?


How many of each model? Which markets?
What materials to order? What cost?

qualitative focus
quantitative focus
Centre for Technology Management

Performance
Technology as a dynamic resource
Technology New dominant
discontinuity technology
(disruptive??)
Base Technology ‘S’ curves
Current
dominant Shape influenced by:
Key
technology • Market demand
• Scientific knowledge
Pacing
Emerging ‘Turbulence’ • Investment / innovation
Adapted from Bower & Christensen, 1995
Time
Strategic Postures
1. Shape the future 2. Adapt to the future 3. Reserve the right to play
Performance
Performance

Performance
Time Courtney et al (HBR, 1997) Time Time
Centre for Technology Management

Evolution of long range planning approaches


1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Strategic
planning
Motorola develops
technology
roadmapping Take up in Semiconductor
approach electronics Technology Roadmap Roadmapping
sector approach
Take up in supports
Co-evolution other sectors integrated
- companies strategic
- consortia planning
- government
Policy Foresight
Forecasting
Science fiction Futures & Scenario planning
Centre for Technology Management

Technology roadmapping
Relationship to the strategic planning process

Market Information
Where are the
boundaries of
the roadmapping
Product-Market analysis process?

Product-Technology Roadmap Defined Project


Options Evaluation Creation Targets Proposals

Technology Assessment

Identification of Technology
Available / Feasible / Possible Source: EIRMA, 1997
Centre for Technology Management

Technology roadmapping
Two extremes

1. Market ‘pull’ 2. Technology ‘push’


- How to reach a goal? - What opportunities could arise?

• Planning • Technology focus


• Market focus • Looking for opportunities
• Assumes product market opportunity • Open ended
• Deterministic • Divergent
• Convergent
• Customer driven
Centre for Technology Management

The ‘fast-start’ concept:


roadmapping as an ongoing process
Programme
management

Project 3
management
Synchronise Corporate
2 planning
Forecasting Product
Persuade Portfolio
1 planning management

Understand Resource Measure: Measure:


Simplification allocation Aligned Ongoing
Measure:
priorities & co-ordination
Competitive Accuracy
analysis decisions
and clarity

Fast-Start Kappel, 2001


Roadmapping
(Lucent Technologies)
influence
Centre for Technology Management

Flexibility of roadmapping
Flexibility is a key strength (and challenge) of the roadmapping
approach, in terms of:
• The wide range of aims that roadmapping can contribute towards
• The timeframe covered by the roadmap (past and future)
• The structure of the roadmap (layers and sub-layers), which can be adapted to
fit the particular application
• The process that is followed to develop and maintain the roadmap/s
• The graphical format that is selected to present information and communicate
the roadmap
• The set of existing processes, tools and information sources in the firm, which
the roadmap and roadmapping process need to integrate with
Centre for Technology Management

Types of roadmap: purpose and format


Purpose Format
Product
planning Bars
Capability
planning Multiple layers
Table
Strategic
planning

Single layer
Long range
planning
Graph
Generic TRM Text
Knowledge asset
planning
Pictorial
Programme
planning
Flow
Process
planning
Integration
planning
Centre for Technology Management

Generic roadmap - links resources to objectives


Layers connect:
Past Now Plans Future Vision Time
Market / Customers / Competitors / (know-when)
Environment / Industry /
Business / Trends / Drivers / Threats / ‘purpose’
Objectives / Milestones / Strategy (know-why)

ll
Pu
t
Products / Services / Applications /

ke
ar
Services / Capabilities / Performance / ‘delivery’

M
Features / Components / Families /
Processes / Systems / Platforms /
(know-what)
Opportunities / Requirements / Risks

h
us
Technology /
Competences / yp
log
‘resources’
no
Knowledge (know-how)
ch
Te

Other resources:
Skills / Partnerships / Suppliers /
Facilities / Infrastructure / Organisation /
Standards / Science / Finance / R&D Projects
Centre for Technology Management

Technology roadmaps
Examples of applications
• Motorola
- To encourage business managers to give proper attention to the technological future
- To provide a vehicle for organising the forecasting process
- To communicate to design & development engineers and marketing personnel which
technologies will be required in future products

• Lucas
- To provide integrated project planning for engineering systems
- To supply sound technological inputs to the budget process

• Post Office Research Group


- To communicate the research plans to business sponsors
- To help focus and prioritisation of research activity
- To identify where expert knowledge is required in the future
Centre for Technology Management

Motorola Roadmap Matrix


- summary of product plans and technology forecast
Year 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Tuning Push button Push button - Synthesizers Touch pad - Synthesizers Voice actuated

Selectivity Ceramic resonators SAWs Digital signal processors

Subcarrier function Stereo Paging Data Maps

IC technology Linear 5u CMOS 3u CMOS 1u CMOS

Display LEDs Liquid crystal Fluorescence

Vehicular LAN Single wire Glass fibre

Digital modulation 500 kHz bandwidth

RECEIVER 1 RECEIVER 2 RECEIVER 3 NEXT GENERATION FUTURE GENERATION

PRODUCTS Plus: A NEW SERVICE


Stereo Plus: Plus:
Stock market
Scan Personal Road information Super Hi Fi
paging Remote
Seek amplifiers Local maps
Remote controls
Centre for Technology Management

Lucas roadmaps - a required input to the budget process


97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

External influences
External
1 2 3 4
Influences 1.
2.
System 3.
Demonstrator 4.
.

Component / Market Trends


Sub-system
a)
b)
c)
Technology d)
Project .
.
Centre for Technology Management

Lucas Technology Road-map activity coding

Activity Description Market Trends Addressed

Principal Participants/Collaborators

Project Status External Funding Source

Time Window
Centre for Technology Management

Lucas - linking Technology to Business Planning

Business Planning
PP+TRMs
GapAnalysis
Gap Analysis
Gap Analysis
Benchmarking Acquisition
External : Benchmarking
Benchmarking Planning
Forecasting
Forecasting
Forecasting
Markets Make Buy
Competitors Acquisitions
Technologies Technology
Technology
Technology R&D JVs
Audit
Audit
... Audit Projects Licensing

Technology Base
Centre for Technology Management

Post Office Research - communicating & prioritising


Time
Triggers / Uncertain /
Germany Regulator Home shopping EU Increasing transport constraints, 12% reduction
issues high impact liberalised action? takes off liberalised environmental pressure, tolls, etc. in emissions

New business Bespoke solutions Evolve Global reach


European reach
(Europe & NA)

Market Existing products Grow express Timed dated products


trends & services business Changing mail mix (> packets)

Ongoing
Best practice Cost reduction & efficiency improvements

Evolve
E capability E-business fulfilment

Capacity & Evolve


Capabilities efficiency
improvement
Network Evolve Flexible & dynamic
competence ‘distribution’ network

Intelligent transport technologies

Routing & scheduling Network integration


Research GAPS ? Supply chain
Materials handling
activity E-access
Track & trace

Environmental

Colours relate to
Key: Requires investment existing sub-themes
Centre for Technology Management

Foresight Vehicle technology roadmapping initiative


• The overall goal of the technology roadmapping initiative was
to support the aims of the Foresight Vehicle consortium, providing
a framework for ongoing investment in UK research partnerships,
focused on achieving sustainable wealth creation and quality of life

• This required identification of market and industry trends and


drivers that impact future requirements for road transport in the UK,
and the associated technology needs and opportunities

• The roadmapping process encouraged communication and


discussion within a creative workshop environment and the
roadmap provides a framework for continuing this more broadly
in the future
Centre for Technology Management

Road transport system: key themes

Social Social, economic and


environmental drivers
reflect the three
cornerstones of
Economic Environmental sustainable development

Technology, policy and


Political Infrastructural infrastructure
enable or constrain
progress towards the
social, economic and
Technological environmental goals
Centre for Technology Management

Foresight Vehicle technology roadmap: architecture


+5 years +10 years +15 years +20 years
Now Vision
Market / S Time
T

Industry E
E Trends drivers, key issues and uncertainties
P
drivers I

Performance
Evolution of required and desirable functional
measures performance of road transport systems of the future
and targets

Technical Required and desired technological response,


Group areas including research requirements
Centre for Technology Management

Foresight Vehicle technology roadmap: process


Engine and powertrain (E&PT)

Hybrid, electric and alternatively


Market Road fuelled vehicles (HEV)
and transport
Planning industry system Advanced software, sensors, Reporting
Consultation electronics and telematics (ASSET) Synthesis
(Oct ‘01) trends performance (Sept ‘02)
and measures
drivers and targets Advanced structures
and materials (FASMAT)

Design and manufacturing


Processes (DMaP)

Co-ordination, facilitation, data collection, analysis and structuring of information

• 10 month duration • More than 130 participants


• 10 workshops • More than 60 organisations
Example detailed roadmap content (1 of 28): Social trends & drivers
Centre for Technology Management

2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 Vision

80-85% of journeys Growth in personal mobility (70% of Individual 2010: Passenger 2015: 150% 2031: 57% increase in Cheap,
by car 39,40,103 drivers use car for leisure day trips ‘time numbers through increase in UK road traffic, safe,
75% of all journeys every week or month; 50% expect to be budget’ for UK airports international air compared to 1996 80,103 reliable,
are under 5 miles making more by 2020) 42 travel increase by 50% 30 traffic; 100% clean
and 45% are less remains increase in 2031: 40% increase convenient,
Journey times increasing (70% longer 2010: 20-50% 2012: Bicycle in bus / coach
than 2 miles 31 constant ? domestic, comfortable
by 2016 in peak travel periods) 67 increase in European journeys vehicle miles,
31
compared to transport
Nearly one third of Vehicles sold increasingly as Increasing road passenger and double 1995 1 compared to 1996 1 for all
UK households do ‘lifestyle’ choices ? complexity of haulage traffic 13,80
lives ? Frustration with congestion and public 2022: 70%
not have a car (13
increase in journey
million people) 31 Increasing female vehicle purchase / 2010: 10% increase transport continues ?
ownership (women are more likely to (journey time no longer predictable) times in many UK
Many different Trend towards in bus passenger
describe their cars as ‘stylish’, ‘sporty’ or cities 1996 80
stakeholder groups, career journeys 30
with different needs ‘fun’) 42
Balance between ‘downsizing’ for Legal issues and New working / 2030: population
from transport People and jobs improved 2010: 50% in the UK is
global, national frameworks ? living patterns
system have moved out of lifestyle ? increase in rail forecast to
and local
the city and town solutions ? passenger miles 30 Social increase by
UK car-centric Shift from car ownership
centres 103 attitudes 3.3%, to 61
culture Increasing to car access ?
Increasing proportion of women in towards road million 1,39,40,67,
leisure time 39,40
1999: UK ‘leads’ paid employment (9.9 million in transport and after which it will
world in vehicle 1984 to 12.2 million in 1999) 73 Increased the decline to 57
Increasing 2010: 25% of UK 2015: 400 million environment?
theft (twice global More than half of drivers exceed speed use of car million by 2050 73
mobile workforce people live in
average at limits on motorways, dual carriageways pools ?
working teleworking at megacities of more 2030: 22- 27% of
2.5%); cost of and residential roads 66
vehicle-related least two days per than 10 million UK population
crime £6bn 46,47 More residential traffic calming schemes week 57 inhabitants 57 over retirement
and pedestrianisation of town centres age, compared to
Younger 2016: 4 million (25%) 19% in 1998;
2000: Demand to Shift in social
generation more increase in housing (80% pension costs rise
3,500 road traffic reduce deaths attitudes to
Between 8 and IT-literate single-person), increasing from 4.5-5.5% of
deaths and 40,000 and injuries on speeding
20% of car- demand for travel 1,67 GDP 1,25,39,40
serious injuries in roads
UK, at an estimated owning
2007: working at home becoming Continued 2016: 25% increase in number 2021: Households
cost of £13.3bn households
common (currently more than 66% of growth of of UK households, 80% of in South-east
(40,000 deaths and experience
Increasing European organisations with more cities and growth due to single person forecast to grow by
1.7 million injuries in vehicle-related
concern about than 500 employees already practice towns, mainly households; 1.3% rural land 19% on 2001
EU, representing a crime each year,
crime, security teleworking) 28,39,40 in South East use predicted to change to levels 41
cost of 2% of GDP) depending on
8,37,39,40 region 41 and safety urban land use 39,40

Key: Mobility & congestion Lifestyle & attitudes Demographics Health, safety & security
Centre for Technology Management

Example summary roadmap content:


Social trends & drivers
2002 2007 2012 2017 2022

Growing demand for mobility

Social attitudes towards


Congestion and pressure on infrastructure
transport and the environment Cheap, safe,
convenient,
Changing working and living patterns Ageing population
Society

comfortable,
clean and
Increased mobile and home working
secure
Continued growth of transport
More single person households Continued growth of cities and towns
South East for all
Consumer demand for greater variety, quality and performance of products and services

Increasing concern for health, safety and security


Centre for Technology Management

Example summary roadmap content:


Social performance measures & targets
2002 2007 2012 2017 2022

Aim for 2005: 70% user 2010: 80% user 2020: 85%
‘equitable’ satisfaction with satisfaction with user
mobility all transport all transport satisfaction
Vehicle
(same price modes (measure modes with all adaptability
for same of ‘convenience’) transport
journey for modes
2010: Vehicle security (resistance to attack) 5 Urban people
Society

all groups
in society) - Door locks: 5 minutes; Secure storage area in vehicle: 5 transport
minutes
- Alarm systems: 5 minutes; Immobilisers: 20 minutes; Window
glass: 2 minutes Effective
selling and
2005: Road 2010: Road traffic 2020: Road traffic noise reduced
traffic noise noise reduced by by 6dBA; customer
reduced by 3dBA 4dBA Homologated noise reduction of support
from 1998 levels 4dBA and 8dBA for light and
heavy vehicles, respectively
Centre for Technology Management

Example summary roadmap content:


Hybrid, electric and alternatively fuelled vehicle technology
2002 2007 2012 2017 2022
Hybrid, electric and alternatively fuelled vehicle technology development, leading to new fuel and power systems,
such as hydrogen and fuel cells, which satisfy future social, economic and environmental goals
Hybrid, electric & alternatively

Sustainable
Continuous improvement in terms of range, life, safety and vehicle fuel
Increasing Pilot trials and local Hydrogen fuel
performance; development of legislation and standards
cell and engine
fuelled vehicles

variety and fuel distribution


use of hybrid, infrastructure technology systems, that
electric, development trucks and buses first and meet the
multi-fuel and infrastructure
alternatively
50kW fuel cells 200kW fuel cells
becoming needs of
and subsystems and subsystems
fuelled for heavy vehicles
viable on a society,
vehicle large scale industry and
technologies, Use of hydrogen in IC engines, and with ?
and fuel cells as auxiliary power units
the
development
Development of electrics, electronics and battery
environment
of fuels and
systems for new engine and powertrain systems
infrastructure
Development of supporting technologies (storage systems, compressors,
air supply, reforming, materials, thermal management, etc.)
Centre for Technology Management

Faraday Partnership technology roadmapping

Aims:
• To develop a ‘first-cut’ technology roadmap for Faraday Partnership,
bringing together industrial and research communities
• To collect, structure and share knowledge about recent and future
developments in markets and technology, together with requirements
and capabilities of future applications
• To identify key emerging strategic issues, research challenges,
and way forward
Centre for Technology Management

Faraday Partnership technology roadmapping approach


Architecture Process
Now
Past Plans Future Vision
1a) Map trends & drivers
Trends &
1b) Map technology
1a
drivers
2a) Application needs
2a 2a 2b) Application capabilities

Applications 3 3) Applications
- Map
2b 2b - Research challenges
- Skills
Technology 1b - Way forward
Centre for Technology Management

Faraday Partnership technology roadmap process


Phase 1 Phase 2

Potential TRM ‘modes’


Detailed TRM
Summary TRM
1 day Review Strategic TRM
Planning Workshop Roll-out
meeting Thematic TRM
(knowledge
mapping & Template TRM
strategic
review) Project TRM

Co-ordination, facilitation, data collection, analysis and structuring of information


Centre for Technology Management

Software for technology roadmapping


Software supports the roadmapping process, in terms of data storage
Integration and communication, particularly as the process matures…

A number of systems are used:


• MS PowerPoint or other graphics software

• MS Project or other Gantt software

• MS Excel or other spreadsheet software

• US Office of Naval Research ‘Graphical Modelling System’ (GMS) - free!


- http://www.onr.navy.mil/gms/gms.asp

• The Learning Trust ‘Geneva Vision Strategist’ - enterprise solution (Motorola)


- http://www.learningtrust.com
Centre for Technology Management

Useful references
• Willyard and McClees (1987), ‘Motorola's Technology Roadmap process’, Research Management, Vol 30, No 5, pp13-19
• EIRMA (1997) ‘Technology Roadmapping - delivering business vision’, Working Group Report No 52
• Groenveld (1997) ‘Roadmapping integrates business and technology’, Research Technology Management, Vol 40, No. 5, pp. 48-55

• Kostoff, R.N. (1997), ‘Science and Technology Roadmaps’, Defense Technical Information Center,
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/kostoff/index.html
• Garcia & Bray (1997) ‘Fundamentals of technology roadmapping’, Sandia National Lab, http://www.sandia/gov SAND97-0665
• Schaller(1999) master roadmap bibliography: http://mason.gmu.edu/~rschalle/master.html
• Kappel (2001) ‘Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future’, Journal of Product Innovation Management,
Vol 18, pp39-50
• Research Technology Management - special edition on technology roadmapping, Vol 42, No. 2, March 2003 (5 papers, including
Domino Printing Sciences, Lucent Technologies, Roche and Rockwell Automation experience)
• OEM Roadmaps - lots of links to (mainly) sector roadmaps: http://www.oemroadmaps.com
• US Department of Energy guide to applying science and technology roadmapping in environmental management (Draft), DoE-EM50,
July 2000, http://emi-web.inel.gov/roadmap/links.html
• Australian guide to developing technology roadmaps - technology planning for business competitiveness, August 2001:
http://industry.gov.au/library/content_library/ 13_technology_road_mapping.pdf
• Industry Canada - Technology roadmapping - a strategy for success, including a guide for government employees:
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/intrm-crt.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/Home
Centre for Technology Management

T-Plan ‘fast-start’ approach


Centre for Technology Management

Roadmapping challenges
50
45
40
Response (%)

35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Starting up Developing a Roll-out of Keeping the Other
the TRM robust TRM the TRM TRM process
process process process 'alive' on an
ongoing
basis
Source: CTM survey, 1999
Centre for Technology Management

T-Plan aims
• To support the start-up of company-specific TRM processes
• To establish key linkages between technology resources and
business drivers
• To identify important gaps in market, product and technology
intelligence
• To develop a ‘first-cut’ technology roadmap
• To support technology strategy and planning initiatives in the firm
• To support communication between technical and commercial
functions

http://www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/pubs/TPlan/index.htm
Centre for Technology Management

T-Plan Applications
Sector / product Aims
• Industrial coding (x3) - Product planning
• Postal services (x10) - Integration of R&D into business; business planning
• Security / access systems - Product planning
• Labelling software - Product planning
• Surface coatings - New product development process
• Medical packaging (x2) - Business reconfiguration
• Automotive sub-systems - Service development & planning
• Power transmission - Business opportunities of new technology
• Railway infrastructure (x3) - Capital investment planning and technology insertion
• National infrastructure - Research programme planning
• Building controls - New product / service opportunity; business reconfiguration
• Road transport - Defining the national research agenda for the sector
• Technical consulting (x6) - New product / service development, strategy
• Automotive / Aerospace - Corporate co-operation and synergy
• Academic (x2) - Strategic planning
• Biochemicals - Research priorities / network development
• Satellite navigation - Research priorities / network development
• Food processing - Research priorities / network development
• Pneumatic systems - Innovation strategy
• Emerging technologies - Research priorities
• Automotive - Innovation opportunities
• Retail (x2) - Business and product strategy
• Construction - Global production strategy
Centre for Technology Management

Fast-start TRM process


Standard and Customised process
Roadmapping Integrated
product-technology
Standard process strategic planning

Planning
Planning Roll-out
Roll-out
Customised process

General strategic
planning
Centre for Technology Management

Standard T-Plan process


Procedure: 4 half-day workshops
Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Workshop 3 Workshop 4
Market Product Technology Roadmapping
• Performance • Product feature • Technology • Linking
dimensions concepts solutions technology
• Market / business • Grouping • Grouping resources to
drivers • Impact ranking • Impact ranking future market
• Prioritisation • Product strategy • Gaps opportunities
• SWOT • Gaps • Gaps
• Gaps

• Setting up • Following on
• Managing the process
the process from the process
Centre for Technology Management

Roadmap input data & structure development


Technology
Roadmap time

Business / Market drivers


Business /

Product features
Market

Product / Product features


Technology solutions

Service /
Production

Technology /
Resources

Analysis
Grids
Centre for Technology Management
Example Market-Product grid (Softco)
Market Softco
Ranking:
Prioritisation: Major Pharmaceutical: 9 10 7 6 1 2 6 5
5 7 9 6 10 =1 = -1
(scale of 10) CRO: 9 10 10 2 8 4 7 7
Σ Cell scores x Driver priority

1. Time to market of drug

E. Improving bottom line


1 year after release
Market / Normalised: max score = 10

D. Motivation of staff
Business

Pharmaceutical
2. Integrity of trial

C. Time to market
5. Leading edge
Drivers

4. Globalisation

7. Connectivity

8. Future proof
6. Ease of use
3. Cost of trial

A. Reusability
Product
Feature

B. No. 1

Softco
Major

CRO
Concepts

1. Security 5.5 4.8 4.5

2. Validated software 4.7 4.2 1.1

3. Compliance * 8.7 8.3 4.9

4. Services 5.0 4.1 3.8

5. Data management 10.0 10.0 3.0

6. Labelling 9.6 9.9 9.5

7. Global solution ** 5.8 2.5


5.9

8. Flexible implementation 6.8 7.5 10.0

9. Softco requirements 0.7 0.8 2.7

10. User friendly 3.2 4.2 5.2


* 1 for difficulty, 2 for size ** Payback later
Centre for Technology Management
Example Product-Technology grid (Softco)

* * * Ranking:
Prioritisation: Major Pharmaceutical: 5.5 4.7 8.7 5.0 10.0 9.6 5.9 6.8 0.7 3.2
- from Grid 1 CRO: 4.8 4.2 8.3 4.1 10.0 9.9 5.8 7.5 0.8 4.2 =1 = -1
(scale of 10) Sofco 4.5 1.1 4.9 3.8 3.0 9.5 2.5 10.0 2.7 5.2
Σ Cell scores x Driver priority

8. Flexible implementation
Normalised: max score = 10
Product

9. Softco requirements
2. Validated software

5. Data management
Feature

Pharmaceutical
7. Global solution
Concepts

10. User friendly


3. Compliance

6. Labelling
4. Services
1. Security
Technology

Softco
CRO
Major
Areas

1. Alliances 7.8 7.6 7.2

2. System architecture 10.0 10.0 10.0

3. Design 7.1 7.2 7.1

4. ‘Soft’ technologies 6.9 6.8 6.5

5. Output technologies 6.4 6.4 6.3

6. Securing technologies 8.6 8.4 7.6


**
7. Core technologies (re-use) 8.3 8.2 7.5
* must have
** -ve re-use past, + re-use future
Centre for Technology Management
Example first-cut technology roadmap (Softco)
Year 0 Phase 1 Year 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Year 2 Phase 4 Phase 5 Year 3
Market / Competitor
Competitor
threat? Market
Version 1
release Price: £10
threat Legislation?
Business launch -15K/seat
Database
User Time out Digitally Audit Digital signatured Watermarked escrow TA6
1. Security rights security levels signed labels TA6 trail audit trail TA6 forms & reports Biometric
TA5 TA6 passwords
2.Validated Validated Validated Validated
Software Ver. 1 Ver. 2 Ver. 330
Product Features

Graphic User format-


Protocol Randomised Form TA5 Advanced Enhanced
3. Compliance design module design package printing automation randomisation
representation ting tool
of R&S phrases for forms
Upgrade path
Multi-level for existing User group Global
4. Services training & conference support TA1
users
Billing &
5. Data Validated protocol Multi-language Secure Statistical
inventory
Management design module database archiving analysis
management
TA7 Windows Code 39 & 128 Blinded Label Other bar- TA7
Labelling Printer XML data Label set
6. Labelling libraries independent format
printers: PDF 417 labels design code types libraries
TA2
PS / PCLS / PDF barcodes TA7 module
7. Global Inter-site User-docs EU lang Email Web XML data User-docs Far East TA1
UNICODE security (EU lang) modules notifica- language WAP
Solution enabled import / export (Far East)
TA1 for UI tions modules for UI
TA2 TA1
Windows Multiple
8. Flexible Customisable platform platform
Internet
Implementation support
TA2
support
compatible

9. Company Software TA2


Requirements protection

10. User User Protocol On-line


documentation design wizards tutorials
Friendly
Technology Areas

Database partners Appoint Enhanced


Domain expert Network of Legal ERP
1. Alliances partner contacts expertise
(harmonised phrases
& legislation)
distributors network of
contacts
link
outside UK
CH / JAVA / CORBA TCP / IP
2. Sys. Arch. component architecture CGI / ISAPI
A Platform inde- Modular design
3. Design spec. pendent design UML / OOD
Dev. Mngmnt Validatable Build Develop Enhanced
Test eChem ISO 9000 24 hour Internet
4. ‘Soft’ Tech. Team team GNP procedures from
plan
sales
model
tech. TickIT support updates
development
team stability
stability leader (FDA) source
Report Enhanced
5. Output Tech. generation report generation
Scanning &
Write once
6. Securing Tech. technology
storage of
hand-written forms
Rapid &
7. Core Tech. Pipe ++

Other Raise
£ x million
Recruitment
New TAx = link to Technology
software &
Resources management
building Area x
Centre for Technology Management

Group activity -
the bicycle of the future
Centre for Technology Management

Biko: Introduction
• Biko, a small traditional but well regarded bicycle manufacturer
has just been taken over by a large sports equipment and
clothing manufacturer, Sportco

• The new owner has requested a technology roadmap outlining


how Biko proposes to develop its market offering over the next
10 years, and if convinced by their business case is willing to
make significant investment

• A preliminary market review and SWOT analysis have resulted


in two areas of potential interest being identified:
1. Power assisted bicycles
2. High performance ‘lifestyle’ bicycles
Centre for Technology Management

Biko: Instructions

Read handout & follow step-by-step guidance

• Step 1: Market & Business


• Step 2: Product & Service
• Step 3: Technology
Resources / Technology Product Drivers
Other
Business Market
(Internal) (external)
Now
Centre for Technology Management
+2y
+5y
Time
+ 10 y
Centre for Technology Management

Feedback

• What lessons have been learnt about roadmapping?

• How would you take it forward from here?


Centre for Technology Management

Discussion - getting started


Centre for Technology Management

Planning
(customisation checklist)
• Context: scope, focus, aims and resources
• Standard process:
• Roadmap architecture - Follow the guide
• Customised process:
• Process - Creative and collaborative
design activity
• Participants
• Workshop scheduling
• Integration: systems, processes & information
• Preparatory work
Centre for Technology Management

Roadmapping design: an iterative collaborative process

Focus, scope, aims


Business need Plan

Domain
knowledge

dialogue

Business TRM process


owner owner
Architecture
Process
Centre for Technology Management

Implementing roadmapping
Individual planning & discussion

See planning sheet:


– Objectives, scope, stakeholders, architecture, process,
information sources, key issues, next steps

• Individually (or with colleagues) work through ‘planning sheet’


- 10 minutes
• Pull out key points for discussion
Centre for Technology Management

Roadmapping success factors


Response (%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Clear business need

Desire to develop effective business processes


Company culture & politics supported
participation / progress
Right people / functions were involved

Commitment from senior management

Required data / information / knowledge available

Timing of initiative was appropriate

Clear and effective process for developing TRM

Effective tools / techniques / methods

Effective facilitation / training

Other

Source: CTM survey, 1999


Centre for Technology Management

Communication roadmaps

• What is the message?


• Who are you communicating to?
• Information representation / graphic design challenge,
drawing on detailed TRM… focus on the ‘story’ and
‘big picture’
Centre for Technology Management

Conclusions
Benefits of roadmapping:
• A focus for integrated strategic planning
• Can be applied in a wide range of contexts
• Supports communication and network development

Challenges of roadmapping:
• Not a magic bullet - initially more questions than answers likely
• Maintaining the process - the real benefit lies in its ongoing use
• The process and roadmap typically need to be customised
Centre for Technology Management

Review
• Has the workshop met your expectations?
• Will you give roadmapping a try?
• Any questions?

Further support:
• Contact us: Rob Phaal at rp108@eng.cam.ac.uk
• TRM User Group: http://www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/trmug.htm
Centre for Technology Management

Close
Centre for Technology Management

Example Biko output


Now +2y +5y Time + 10 y
Business Market
(Ext.)

Trends: leisure, health, disposable income Competition Legislation: VAT off bikes; cycle paths, etc.
Drivers

New owner Demonstrator New Range 2nd Generation


(Int.)

- Investment “Design your own bike”

Style Designer look Expand range On-line design

“Super-bike”
Product

Ergonomic Moulded
Comfort Customised frame £500-1000
design seat
Technical Direct drive “Chip-on-bike” Automatic”
Networked Networked
Internet mass customisation
business factory
Technology

design Materials / Ergonomics


mechanics CADCAM Visualisation
Electronics Security Communications
Resources

Alliances: gear / drive; styling; electronics


/ Other

Skills Capital Branding & promotion Sportco

You might also like