Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fast-start technology
roadmapping
Dr Robert Phaal
Centre for Technology Management
Workshop aim
To provide:
Agenda
09:00 Overview
09:10 Technology roadmapping - principles & practice
10:30 Break
11:00 T-Plan ‘fast-start’ approach
11:20 Group activity - the bicycle of the future
12:30 Discussion - getting started
13:00 Review and close
Centre for Technology Management
Technology roadmapping -
principles & practice
Centre for Technology Management
Market M1 M2
P1 P2 P3
Product
P4
T1 T2
Technology
T3 T4
R&D RD 1 RD 2 RD 4 RD 6
programmes RD 3 RD 5
New (?):
- Markets
- Products
- Technologies
- Capabilities
- Organisational structures
- Distribution channels
- Competition
Time
Operations Innovation Strategy
qualitative focus
quantitative focus
Centre for Technology Management
Performance
Technology as a dynamic resource
Technology New dominant
discontinuity technology
(disruptive??)
Base Technology ‘S’ curves
Current
dominant Shape influenced by:
Key
technology • Market demand
• Scientific knowledge
Pacing
Emerging ‘Turbulence’ • Investment / innovation
Adapted from Bower & Christensen, 1995
Time
Strategic Postures
1. Shape the future 2. Adapt to the future 3. Reserve the right to play
Performance
Performance
Performance
Time Courtney et al (HBR, 1997) Time Time
Centre for Technology Management
Technology roadmapping
Relationship to the strategic planning process
Market Information
Where are the
boundaries of
the roadmapping
Product-Market analysis process?
Technology Assessment
Identification of Technology
Available / Feasible / Possible Source: EIRMA, 1997
Centre for Technology Management
Technology roadmapping
Two extremes
Project 3
management
Synchronise Corporate
2 planning
Forecasting Product
Persuade Portfolio
1 planning management
Flexibility of roadmapping
Flexibility is a key strength (and challenge) of the roadmapping
approach, in terms of:
• The wide range of aims that roadmapping can contribute towards
• The timeframe covered by the roadmap (past and future)
• The structure of the roadmap (layers and sub-layers), which can be adapted to
fit the particular application
• The process that is followed to develop and maintain the roadmap/s
• The graphical format that is selected to present information and communicate
the roadmap
• The set of existing processes, tools and information sources in the firm, which
the roadmap and roadmapping process need to integrate with
Centre for Technology Management
Single layer
Long range
planning
Graph
Generic TRM Text
Knowledge asset
planning
Pictorial
Programme
planning
Flow
Process
planning
Integration
planning
Centre for Technology Management
ll
Pu
t
Products / Services / Applications /
ke
ar
Services / Capabilities / Performance / ‘delivery’
M
Features / Components / Families /
Processes / Systems / Platforms /
(know-what)
Opportunities / Requirements / Risks
h
us
Technology /
Competences / yp
log
‘resources’
no
Knowledge (know-how)
ch
Te
Other resources:
Skills / Partnerships / Suppliers /
Facilities / Infrastructure / Organisation /
Standards / Science / Finance / R&D Projects
Centre for Technology Management
Technology roadmaps
Examples of applications
• Motorola
- To encourage business managers to give proper attention to the technological future
- To provide a vehicle for organising the forecasting process
- To communicate to design & development engineers and marketing personnel which
technologies will be required in future products
• Lucas
- To provide integrated project planning for engineering systems
- To supply sound technological inputs to the budget process
External influences
External
1 2 3 4
Influences 1.
2.
System 3.
Demonstrator 4.
.
Principal Participants/Collaborators
Time Window
Centre for Technology Management
Business Planning
PP+TRMs
GapAnalysis
Gap Analysis
Gap Analysis
Benchmarking Acquisition
External : Benchmarking
Benchmarking Planning
Forecasting
Forecasting
Forecasting
Markets Make Buy
Competitors Acquisitions
Technologies Technology
Technology
Technology R&D JVs
Audit
Audit
... Audit Projects Licensing
Technology Base
Centre for Technology Management
Ongoing
Best practice Cost reduction & efficiency improvements
Evolve
E capability E-business fulfilment
Environmental
Colours relate to
Key: Requires investment existing sub-themes
Centre for Technology Management
Industry E
E Trends drivers, key issues and uncertainties
P
drivers I
Performance
Evolution of required and desirable functional
measures performance of road transport systems of the future
and targets
80-85% of journeys Growth in personal mobility (70% of Individual 2010: Passenger 2015: 150% 2031: 57% increase in Cheap,
by car 39,40,103 drivers use car for leisure day trips ‘time numbers through increase in UK road traffic, safe,
75% of all journeys every week or month; 50% expect to be budget’ for UK airports international air compared to 1996 80,103 reliable,
are under 5 miles making more by 2020) 42 travel increase by 50% 30 traffic; 100% clean
and 45% are less remains increase in 2031: 40% increase convenient,
Journey times increasing (70% longer 2010: 20-50% 2012: Bicycle in bus / coach
than 2 miles 31 constant ? domestic, comfortable
by 2016 in peak travel periods) 67 increase in European journeys vehicle miles,
31
compared to transport
Nearly one third of Vehicles sold increasingly as Increasing road passenger and double 1995 1 compared to 1996 1 for all
UK households do ‘lifestyle’ choices ? complexity of haulage traffic 13,80
lives ? Frustration with congestion and public 2022: 70%
not have a car (13
increase in journey
million people) 31 Increasing female vehicle purchase / 2010: 10% increase transport continues ?
ownership (women are more likely to (journey time no longer predictable) times in many UK
Many different Trend towards in bus passenger
describe their cars as ‘stylish’, ‘sporty’ or cities 1996 80
stakeholder groups, career journeys 30
with different needs ‘fun’) 42
Balance between ‘downsizing’ for Legal issues and New working / 2030: population
from transport People and jobs improved 2010: 50% in the UK is
global, national frameworks ? living patterns
system have moved out of lifestyle ? increase in rail forecast to
and local
the city and town solutions ? passenger miles 30 Social increase by
UK car-centric Shift from car ownership
centres 103 attitudes 3.3%, to 61
culture Increasing to car access ?
Increasing proportion of women in towards road million 1,39,40,67,
leisure time 39,40
1999: UK ‘leads’ paid employment (9.9 million in transport and after which it will
world in vehicle 1984 to 12.2 million in 1999) 73 Increased the decline to 57
Increasing 2010: 25% of UK 2015: 400 million environment?
theft (twice global More than half of drivers exceed speed use of car million by 2050 73
mobile workforce people live in
average at limits on motorways, dual carriageways pools ?
working teleworking at megacities of more 2030: 22- 27% of
2.5%); cost of and residential roads 66
vehicle-related least two days per than 10 million UK population
crime £6bn 46,47 More residential traffic calming schemes week 57 inhabitants 57 over retirement
and pedestrianisation of town centres age, compared to
Younger 2016: 4 million (25%) 19% in 1998;
2000: Demand to Shift in social
generation more increase in housing (80% pension costs rise
3,500 road traffic reduce deaths attitudes to
Between 8 and IT-literate single-person), increasing from 4.5-5.5% of
deaths and 40,000 and injuries on speeding
20% of car- demand for travel 1,67 GDP 1,25,39,40
serious injuries in roads
UK, at an estimated owning
2007: working at home becoming Continued 2016: 25% increase in number 2021: Households
cost of £13.3bn households
common (currently more than 66% of growth of of UK households, 80% of in South-east
(40,000 deaths and experience
Increasing European organisations with more cities and growth due to single person forecast to grow by
1.7 million injuries in vehicle-related
concern about than 500 employees already practice towns, mainly households; 1.3% rural land 19% on 2001
EU, representing a crime each year,
crime, security teleworking) 28,39,40 in South East use predicted to change to levels 41
cost of 2% of GDP) depending on
8,37,39,40 region 41 and safety urban land use 39,40
Key: Mobility & congestion Lifestyle & attitudes Demographics Health, safety & security
Centre for Technology Management
comfortable,
clean and
Increased mobile and home working
secure
Continued growth of transport
More single person households Continued growth of cities and towns
South East for all
Consumer demand for greater variety, quality and performance of products and services
Aim for 2005: 70% user 2010: 80% user 2020: 85%
‘equitable’ satisfaction with satisfaction with user
mobility all transport all transport satisfaction
Vehicle
(same price modes (measure modes with all adaptability
for same of ‘convenience’) transport
journey for modes
2010: Vehicle security (resistance to attack) 5 Urban people
Society
all groups
in society) - Door locks: 5 minutes; Secure storage area in vehicle: 5 transport
minutes
- Alarm systems: 5 minutes; Immobilisers: 20 minutes; Window
glass: 2 minutes Effective
selling and
2005: Road 2010: Road traffic 2020: Road traffic noise reduced
traffic noise noise reduced by by 6dBA; customer
reduced by 3dBA 4dBA Homologated noise reduction of support
from 1998 levels 4dBA and 8dBA for light and
heavy vehicles, respectively
Centre for Technology Management
Sustainable
Continuous improvement in terms of range, life, safety and vehicle fuel
Increasing Pilot trials and local Hydrogen fuel
performance; development of legislation and standards
cell and engine
fuelled vehicles
Aims:
• To develop a ‘first-cut’ technology roadmap for Faraday Partnership,
bringing together industrial and research communities
• To collect, structure and share knowledge about recent and future
developments in markets and technology, together with requirements
and capabilities of future applications
• To identify key emerging strategic issues, research challenges,
and way forward
Centre for Technology Management
Applications 3 3) Applications
- Map
2b 2b - Research challenges
- Skills
Technology 1b - Way forward
Centre for Technology Management
Useful references
• Willyard and McClees (1987), ‘Motorola's Technology Roadmap process’, Research Management, Vol 30, No 5, pp13-19
• EIRMA (1997) ‘Technology Roadmapping - delivering business vision’, Working Group Report No 52
• Groenveld (1997) ‘Roadmapping integrates business and technology’, Research Technology Management, Vol 40, No. 5, pp. 48-55
• Kostoff, R.N. (1997), ‘Science and Technology Roadmaps’, Defense Technical Information Center,
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/kostoff/index.html
• Garcia & Bray (1997) ‘Fundamentals of technology roadmapping’, Sandia National Lab, http://www.sandia/gov SAND97-0665
• Schaller(1999) master roadmap bibliography: http://mason.gmu.edu/~rschalle/master.html
• Kappel (2001) ‘Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future’, Journal of Product Innovation Management,
Vol 18, pp39-50
• Research Technology Management - special edition on technology roadmapping, Vol 42, No. 2, March 2003 (5 papers, including
Domino Printing Sciences, Lucent Technologies, Roche and Rockwell Automation experience)
• OEM Roadmaps - lots of links to (mainly) sector roadmaps: http://www.oemroadmaps.com
• US Department of Energy guide to applying science and technology roadmapping in environmental management (Draft), DoE-EM50,
July 2000, http://emi-web.inel.gov/roadmap/links.html
• Australian guide to developing technology roadmaps - technology planning for business competitiveness, August 2001:
http://industry.gov.au/library/content_library/ 13_technology_road_mapping.pdf
• Industry Canada - Technology roadmapping - a strategy for success, including a guide for government employees:
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/intrm-crt.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/Home
Centre for Technology Management
Roadmapping challenges
50
45
40
Response (%)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Starting up Developing a Roll-out of Keeping the Other
the TRM robust TRM the TRM TRM process
process process process 'alive' on an
ongoing
basis
Source: CTM survey, 1999
Centre for Technology Management
T-Plan aims
• To support the start-up of company-specific TRM processes
• To establish key linkages between technology resources and
business drivers
• To identify important gaps in market, product and technology
intelligence
• To develop a ‘first-cut’ technology roadmap
• To support technology strategy and planning initiatives in the firm
• To support communication between technical and commercial
functions
http://www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/pubs/TPlan/index.htm
Centre for Technology Management
T-Plan Applications
Sector / product Aims
• Industrial coding (x3) - Product planning
• Postal services (x10) - Integration of R&D into business; business planning
• Security / access systems - Product planning
• Labelling software - Product planning
• Surface coatings - New product development process
• Medical packaging (x2) - Business reconfiguration
• Automotive sub-systems - Service development & planning
• Power transmission - Business opportunities of new technology
• Railway infrastructure (x3) - Capital investment planning and technology insertion
• National infrastructure - Research programme planning
• Building controls - New product / service opportunity; business reconfiguration
• Road transport - Defining the national research agenda for the sector
• Technical consulting (x6) - New product / service development, strategy
• Automotive / Aerospace - Corporate co-operation and synergy
• Academic (x2) - Strategic planning
• Biochemicals - Research priorities / network development
• Satellite navigation - Research priorities / network development
• Food processing - Research priorities / network development
• Pneumatic systems - Innovation strategy
• Emerging technologies - Research priorities
• Automotive - Innovation opportunities
• Retail (x2) - Business and product strategy
• Construction - Global production strategy
Centre for Technology Management
Planning
Planning Roll-out
Roll-out
Customised process
General strategic
planning
Centre for Technology Management
• Setting up • Following on
• Managing the process
the process from the process
Centre for Technology Management
Product features
Market
Service /
Production
Technology /
Resources
Analysis
Grids
Centre for Technology Management
Example Market-Product grid (Softco)
Market Softco
Ranking:
Prioritisation: Major Pharmaceutical: 9 10 7 6 1 2 6 5
5 7 9 6 10 =1 = -1
(scale of 10) CRO: 9 10 10 2 8 4 7 7
Σ Cell scores x Driver priority
D. Motivation of staff
Business
Pharmaceutical
2. Integrity of trial
C. Time to market
5. Leading edge
Drivers
4. Globalisation
7. Connectivity
8. Future proof
6. Ease of use
3. Cost of trial
A. Reusability
Product
Feature
B. No. 1
Softco
Major
CRO
Concepts
* * * Ranking:
Prioritisation: Major Pharmaceutical: 5.5 4.7 8.7 5.0 10.0 9.6 5.9 6.8 0.7 3.2
- from Grid 1 CRO: 4.8 4.2 8.3 4.1 10.0 9.9 5.8 7.5 0.8 4.2 =1 = -1
(scale of 10) Sofco 4.5 1.1 4.9 3.8 3.0 9.5 2.5 10.0 2.7 5.2
Σ Cell scores x Driver priority
8. Flexible implementation
Normalised: max score = 10
Product
9. Softco requirements
2. Validated software
5. Data management
Feature
Pharmaceutical
7. Global solution
Concepts
6. Labelling
4. Services
1. Security
Technology
Softco
CRO
Major
Areas
Other Raise
£ x million
Recruitment
New TAx = link to Technology
software &
Resources management
building Area x
Centre for Technology Management
Group activity -
the bicycle of the future
Centre for Technology Management
Biko: Introduction
• Biko, a small traditional but well regarded bicycle manufacturer
has just been taken over by a large sports equipment and
clothing manufacturer, Sportco
Biko: Instructions
Feedback
Planning
(customisation checklist)
• Context: scope, focus, aims and resources
• Standard process:
• Roadmap architecture - Follow the guide
• Customised process:
• Process - Creative and collaborative
design activity
• Participants
• Workshop scheduling
• Integration: systems, processes & information
• Preparatory work
Centre for Technology Management
Domain
knowledge
dialogue
Implementing roadmapping
Individual planning & discussion
Other
Communication roadmaps
Conclusions
Benefits of roadmapping:
• A focus for integrated strategic planning
• Can be applied in a wide range of contexts
• Supports communication and network development
Challenges of roadmapping:
• Not a magic bullet - initially more questions than answers likely
• Maintaining the process - the real benefit lies in its ongoing use
• The process and roadmap typically need to be customised
Centre for Technology Management
Review
• Has the workshop met your expectations?
• Will you give roadmapping a try?
• Any questions?
Further support:
• Contact us: Rob Phaal at rp108@eng.cam.ac.uk
• TRM User Group: http://www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/trmug.htm
Centre for Technology Management
Close
Centre for Technology Management
Trends: leisure, health, disposable income Competition Legislation: VAT off bikes; cycle paths, etc.
Drivers
“Super-bike”
Product
Ergonomic Moulded
Comfort Customised frame £500-1000
design seat
Technical Direct drive “Chip-on-bike” Automatic”
Networked Networked
Internet mass customisation
business factory
Technology