CITASI TUJUAN & DESAIN SAMPEL VARIABEL VARIABEL UJI HASIL IMPLIKASI KEKUATA KELEMAHA KUALITAS KESIMPULAN

PERTANYAAN PENELI INDEPENDEN DEPENDEN STAT PENELITIAN N N PENELITIAN UNTUK

PENELITIAN TIAN DAN DAN ISTI PENELITI PENELITIA KEPERAWATAN
PENGUKURAN PENGUKURAN AN N
NYA NYA
Brémault- Tujuan : Desain the symposium Kebijakan, Penanganan pada Developing an BSA has uniquely Dalam Tidak Penelitian ini Penanganan pada
Phillips, * identify and discuss kualitatif was attended by pelayanan geriatri dengan Alberta Action Plan created an penelitian diberikan sudah cukup geriatri yang
S., issues related to the dengan 53 professionals RB (Beha- vioural effective kualitatif ini contoh dari baik sebagai mengalami
Germani, provision of health care pendekat from a variety of Supports Alberta, provincial sudah cukup pemaparan penelitian permasalahan
T., Sacrey, services for individuals an settings, including ndb) was the community of jelas dalam atau bentuk desain dengan gangguan
L. A. R., across Alberta, who campura emergency or formation of BSA, practice, interest memaparkan data secara kualitatif. mental, harus
Friesen, S., live and cope with RB's n acute care (6%), the or- ganization is and research that hasil yang kualitatif. dilakukan secara
& Lee, J. * to develop a plan to rehabilitation still in its infancy. integrates within didapat. komprehensif
(2015). address this challenge (6%), mental A benefit of BSA is and across dengan tindakan
Managing across the continuum health (19%), the ability for differing sectors klinis yang sesuai
disruptive of care home care (28%), members to discuss and regions of serta beberapa
behaviours Pertanyaan : supportive/assisted ongoing issues and service delivery kerjasama lintas
exhibited Bagaimana para living (26%), continue to build without the sektoral dengan
by older peserta simposium long-term/facility support for potential of beberapa profesi
adults with dapat menggambarkan living (36%), healthcare government bias termauk pembuat
mental mengenai praktik klinis housing (6%), and professionals who given its unfunded kebijakan agar
health, yang baik dalam government (6%). deal with RB's nature. BSA offers lebih melindungi
addictions menangani geriatri Although across various an innovative, geriatri yang
and dengan RB participants were service sectors. The grassroots mengalami
neurocogni invited from BSA holds approach to the gangguan mental.
tive various service pertinent issue of RB's, a
conditions sectors, the information for re- vehicle for
in Alberta: majority worked sponding and informing and
A mixed in direct service dealing with RB's, driving policy
methods provision to older and as such, based on needs
approach. adults. In addition, strategies that work identified by
Geriatric some attendees multiple
Mental worked in multiple stakeholders.
Health areas, thus the Finally, BSA
Care, 3(2), total does not add offers a vehicle for
21-27. to 100. innovation that
can inform policy
and practice, bring
coherence to and
consistency across
 systems, eliminate
costs associated
with reinventing
resources, enrich
care delivery, and
support the
maximal
utilization of
resources in the
management of
RB's.
Tavares, L. Tujuan : Desain Participants must Psychotherapy geriatric Group therapy can Group therapy is a Dalam Langkah- Penelitian ini Psikoterapi
R., & To ascertain the e kuantitati be 60 years or depression : significantly viable option to penelitian ini langkah dalam sudah baik, kelompok terbukti
Barbosa, ffects of group f older, and significant improve improve the pembahasan penelitian karena sudah secara klinis dapat
M. R. psychotherapy on denganm formally depressive geriatric depression. symptoms of GD sudah kurang jelas, terindeks dan mengatasi masalah
(2018). geriatric depression in eta diagnosed with a symptoms as Improvements were and to ameliorate dipaparkan tidakdijelaska terpublikasi depresi pada
Efficacy of people aged 60 years analisis depressive measured with a found across a the mental health secara jelas n metode atau internasional. geriatri, hal ini
group and older, compared disorder according validated scale variety of settings, and well-being of dan juga cara olah data sudah diterapkan
psychother with alternative to the definitions protocols, older adults. dapat dalam beberapa
apy for treatments or no by the American participant Group CBT dipahami ranah keperawatan
geriatric treatment. Psychiatric characteristics, and constitutes a valid oleh jiwa, namun
depression: Association or the for several and reliable pembaca, mungkin
A Pertanyaan : World Health psychological paradigm, while terdapat memerlukan
systematic Bagi geriatri yang Organization, or domains. group RT seems to perbandinga beberapa
review. mengalami depresi, have significant also be n perlakuan pembaharuan
Archives of apakah psikoterapi depressive recommendable pada protokol terapi
Gerontolo kelompok lebih efektif symptoms as despite less kelompok, dengan mencari-
gy and dibandingkan dengan measured with a consistent results. sehingga cari hal baru agar
Geriatrics, terapi alternatif validated scale. dapat lebih efektif dalam
78, 71-80. ataupun tanpa terapi We excluded melihat penerapannya dan
dalam menurunkan studies including keefektifan berdampak klinis
tingkat depresi pada participants with dari secara signifikan
geriatri. comorbid psikoterapi sehingga dapat
psychopathologies kelompok membantu
except anxiety pada geriatri mengatasi
disorders (due to dengan permasalahan
common co- depresi.s depresi pada
occurrence with geriatri.
depression;
Kaufman &
 Charney, 2000),
and studies
including
participants with
any degree of
cognitive
impairment.
Mace, R. Tujuan : Desain Study inclusion Therapeutic Geriatric This TR predicted This is the first Langkah- TR was not Penelitian ini Dalam melalakukan
A., TR predicted reduction kuantitita criteria required a Relationship : Depression study reduction of study to langkah assessed sudah baik, perawatan pada
Gansler, D. of depression in both tif minimum age of Client Perception with Executive analyz depression in both demonstrate an dalam throughout the karena sudah geriatric dengan
A., Suvak, treatment groups, while 60, DSM-IV of Therapist Scale Dysfunction : ed treatment groups, effect of TR on the penelitian course of terindeks dan depresi, teknik
M. K., treatment x TR diagnosis of major (CPTS) The 24-item data while treatment x efficacy of dijelaskan treatment terpublikasi terapeutik harus
Gabris, C. interactions were not depressive (1) the version of the from TR interactions psychotherapy in dengan detai (only after the internasional. menjadi terapi yang
M., Areán, significant. disorder, a Mini- therapist’s ability Hamilton a were not depressed older setiap waktu first therapy masuk dalam
P. A., Mental Status to communicate Rating Scale rando significant. Patients adults with dalam 12 session and at kesinambungan
for Depression
Raue, P. J., Pertanyaan : Exam (MMSE; and understand, mized treated by therapists executive minggu, data post- keperawatan,
(HRSD;
& Folstein et al., (2) emotional contro with higher average dysfunctions. Our dianalisis treatment) and sehingga dapat
Hamilton,
Alexopoul Bagi geriatri penderita 1975) score ≥ 24 distance, and (3) 1960) was used l trial Understanding findings are dijelaskan did not include membangun trust
os, G. S. depresi, apakah (to determine a therapist status to measure (patient and consistent with a secara detai ratings from dengan geriatri ,
(2017). perawatan dengan lack of global (superior, equal, changes in therapist level) and previous hasilnya an objective sudah banyak
Therapeuti terapeutik yang cognitive subordinate). depression in Accepting investigation of sehingga evaluator. diaplikasikan
c didampingi oleh terapis impairment or The CPTS response to (therapist level) depressed older dapat terapeutik dalam
relationshi lebih efektif dementia), contains Likert treatment. ratings had greater adults who were melihat bentuk komunikasi
p in the dibandingkan dengan Initiation/Persever ratings of Items are rated decreases in not selected for the seberapa dalam dunia
treatment yang tidak didampingi ation subscale of perceived either on a 0-2 depression. The presence of nerpengaruh keperawatan.
of geriatric oleh terapis dalam the Mattis therapist or 0-4 point patient level x executive nya TR.
depression menurunkan tingkat Dementia Rating qualities ranging scale (total = 0- therapist level dysfunction As in
with depresi. Scale (Mattis, from 1-5, with a 76), with interaction for our study,
executive 1988) score < 33, score of 1 greater scores Understanding participant
dysfunctio and Stroop Color indicating “Not indicating approached perception of the
n. Journal Word Test (Perret, at All True” and higher severity statistical quality of the
of affective 1974) scores < 25. a score of 5 of depression. significance (p = therapeutic
disorders, (n=220) indicating HRSD cut .065), suggesting a alliance was a
214, 130- “Extremely scores indicate synergistic effect on predictor of
137. True.” Greater no (≤ 9), mild treatment outcome. response to
(10-19),
scores indicate a Together, cognitive therapy.
moderate (20-
more positive 29), or severe Understanding and However,
impression of the depression (≥ Accepting predicted therapeutic
therapist. Each 21% of variance in alliance assessed
item also depression level with a modified
 includes the 30). changes. version of the
response options Systematic
of 6 or 7 for Treatment
“Refused” and Selection
“Don’t know”, Framework did
respectively. not predict
outcomes
throughout a 16-
week
psychotherapy
trial in a different
sample of older
patients.
Methodological
differences may
explain these
divergent findings.
and our study
investigated
geriatric
depression
severity, while
examined patient-
rated distress level
and quality of life.
Our findings
suggest that
therapists of
depressed older
adults should
actively monitor
their contribution
to TR
Chakkamp Tujuan : the effect of Desain 100 patients above geriatric Depression : The 100 patients above Our results These Penjelasan Penelitian ini "AM SAD", selain
arambil, Combining five kuantitati 65yrs were depression Depression data 65yrs were support the studies may mengenai uji sudah baik, sederhana, singkat
B., commonly observed f selected screening tool 5- Scale(GDS) 15- was selected. AM SAD reliability and also tell us statistik tidak karena sudah dan sensitif, bisa
Chibnall, J. symptoms of late-life items and items and the analyz validity of the whether the dijelaskan terindeks dan mungkin digunakan
correlation with
T., depression to develop a psychometrically Montgomery – ed “AM SAD” for AM-SAD secara rinci. terpublikasi dalam diagnosis
Graypel, E. short depression tested. (A) Stands Asberg using GDS was 0.72 and depression can be used internasional. depresi retrospektif
A., screening tool with for change in Depression Rating IBM patients above screening in as a tool to Ini akan
Manepalli, similar sensitivity and Appetite, (M) for Scale SPSS 65yrs were geriatric out- measure the menghemat waktu
J. N., specificity as the Mood, (S) for (MADRS) 10- Statist selected. AM SAD patients with severity of dan membuat
Bhutto, A., conventional, more Sleep, (A) for items. Patients ics 22 correlation with SLUMS score depression skrining lebih
& time consuming tools. Activity or energy with cognitive ≥20. in efisien dan
GDS was 0.72 and
Grossberg, level and (D) for impairment (who comparison terjangkau di klinik
G. T. Pertanyaan : thoughts of Death scored less than 20 MADRS 0.80. AM with the perawatan primer
(2015). Bagi geriatri dengan (life not worth on the St. Louis SAD yielded a MADRS atau di lingkungan
Developm depresi , apakah living, University Mental sensitivity and which is a komunitas lainnya.
ent of a penggunaan skreening worthlessness/guil Status (SLUMS) specificity of 79% gold-
brief depresi dengan t). Frequency of questionnaire)[10] and 62% against standard tool
validated AMSAD lebih mudah occurrence of each were excluded diagnosis of used
geriatric digunakan symptom over the from the study. currently.
depression; of 88%
depression dibandingkan dengan prior two weeks is
screening alat skening depresi quantified as: (0)- and 62% with
tool: The lainnya untuk menilai never, (1)-one day GDS-15; and 92%
SLU “AM depresi pada geriatri. only and (2)-two and 71% with
SAD”. The or more days. The MADRS.
American maximum total
Journal of score is 10.
Geriatric
Psychiatry,
23(8), 780-
783.
García- Tujuan : untuk menilai Desain 82 participant > 60 Terapi perilaku Depresi : MMSE T-test More than 80% of This report Penjelasan Penjelasan Penelitian ini Terapi perilaku
Peña, C., keefektifan Kuantitat years old. kognitif sampl the participants presents results dalam tabel mengenai sudah baik, kognitif bila
Vázquez- terapi perilaku kognitif if e were women (85% from a pragmatic sudah cukup skoring dan karena sudah diterapkan dalam
Estupiñan, kelompok untuk in the IG and 80% trial based on a baik. Sudah juga langkah- terindeks dan keperawatan
F., Avalos- geriatri yang depresi in the CG), and the feasible primary ada langkah terpublikasi menghadapi geriatri
Pérez, F., dalam perawatan mean age was 70.8 care intervention. pembagian penelitian internasional. dengan deprisi
Jiménez, primer. (s=7.4) (70.39 in A group kelompok belum dapat berpengaruh
L. V. R., the TG and 70.15 in cognitivebehaviou kontrol dan dijelaskan untuk menurunkan
Sánchez- Pertanyaan : the CG). Marital ral therapy carried kelompok secara rinci, tingkat depresi,
Garcia, S., Bagi geriatri dengan status, level of out by trained intervensi, termasuk namun tidak terlalu
& Juárez- depresi , apakah terapi education, number nurses reduced the sehingga proses olah signifikan,
Cedillo, T. perilaku kognitif of inhabitants in the depression levels dapat data, tidak mungkin dapat
(2015). efektif untuk participant’s of elderly didapatkan terdapat digunakan dengan
Clinical menurunkan tingkat household, participants hasil yang kesimpulan beberapa
effectivene depresi. insurance status, cukup jelas. yang jelas modifikasi.
ss of group religion, paid work,
cognitiveb main occupation,
ehavioural and income source
therapy for did not significantly
depressed differ between the
older two groups
people in (p>0.05). In the IG,
primary 56% of the
care: A participants (n=23)
randomise displayed a
d decrease that was
controlled greater than or
trial. Salud equal to 5 points on
Mental, the PHQ-9
38(1), 33- compared with 30%
39. (n=12) in the
control group. A
decrease between 4
to 1 points was
obtained by 19.5%
(n=8) of the
participants in the
IG versus 22.5%
(n=9) in the CG.
None change or
increase of up to 5
points were
reported in 10
participants
(24.3%) in the IG
and 19 (46.3%) in
the control group
(table 4). Item
number 4 (Feeling
tired or without
energy) was
reported with a
reduction of 1 to
three points in 22
participants
(53.6%) of the IG
compared with 10
 (25%) in the CG
(p=0.02). A
reduction of 1 to 3
points was found in
the Item 6 (Feeling
bad about yourself)
for 20 participants
(48.7%) in the IG
and 8 (20%) in the
CG. Differences in
reductions were not
found statistically
significant.

NAMA : NATHAYA ENGGAR NINGRUM

PRODI : PROFESI NERS