Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.1: Introduction
The economic history of the world has demonstrated that various economic
crises can impact the economic systems and expose them to high risks. In order to
prevail over the future crisis, it becomes important to understand the evolution and
development of financial system. The present chapter gives a comprehensive
overview of the role and development of financial system in general and India in
specific. An economy without a financial system would have implied two things;
First, without a financial system, the economy would be subject to all the
inefficiencies of a barter system. Second, without a financial system, the economy
would probably have a relatively low level of investment and would tend to
misallocate whatever investment it had. There is no doubt that, finance is the linchpin
of economy and a financial system plays a key role in the smooth and efficient
functioning of the economy.
1
Khan M Y (2014), Indian Financial System, Eighth Edition, McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, New Delhi, p.1
79
2
Van Horne James C (2002), Financial Management and Policy, 12th Edition, Pearson Education, India, Chapter. 1.
3
Chandra Prasanna (2001) Financial Management, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, p.22
4
Ang B James (2008), "A Survey of Recent Developments in the Literature of Finance and Growth", Journal of Economic
Surveys, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 536-576.
80
The financial system in the Indian economy also performs the above
mentioned functions and helps in the allocation of funds by channelizing it from
savers and lending it to the borrowers.
5
Levine Ross (1997), "Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda", Journal of Economic Literature,
June, 3592, pp.688-726.
81
Private Corporate
Year Household Sector Public Sector Total
Sector
1990-91 1,08,603 15,164 10,641 1,34,408
1991-92 1,05,632 20,304 17,594 1,43,530
1992-93 1,27,943 19,968 16,709 1,64,621
1993-94 1,51,454 29,866 11,674 1,92,994
1994-95 1,87,142 35,260 24,266 2,46,668
1995-96 1,98,585 59,153 31,527 2,89,265
1996-97 2,24,653 62,540 31,194 3,18,387
1997-98 2,84,127 66,080 29,583 3,79,790
1998-99 3,52,114 69,191 -3,146 4,18,159
1999-00 4,38,851 87,234 -9,238 5,16,847
2000-01 4,63,750 81,062 -29,266 5,15,545
2001-02 5,45,288 76,906 -36,820 5,85,374
2002-03 5,64,161 99,217 -7,148 6,56,230
2003-04 6,57,587 1,29,816 36,372 8,23,775
2004-05 7,63,785 2,12,519 74,499 10,50,703
2005-06 8,68,988 2,77,208 88,955 12,35,151
2006-07 9,94,396 3,38,584 1,52,929 14,85,909
2007-08 11,18,347 4,69,023 2,48,962 18,36,332
2008-09 13,30,873 4,17,467 54,280 18,02,620
2009-10 16,30,799 5,,40,955 10,585 21,82,338
2010-11 18,00,174 6,20,300 2,01,268 26,21,742
2011-12 20,54,737 6,58,428 1,11,295 28,24,459
Source: Government of India, Economic Survey 2014-15, Volume II, Ministry of Finance, Department
of Economic Affairs, February 2015, Oxford University Press, pp. A12-A13.
Both the public sector and the private corporate sector are net deficit spenders
who draw upon the savings of the household sector (the dominant saver in the
economy) to finance their spending. The households sector also borrows from other
sectors, which include mainly banks, cooperatives, term-lending institutions, and the
government.
82
The Table-3.1 presents the estimates of Gross Domestic Savings (GDS) in the
Indian economy over the years. The GDS which was `. 1,34,408 crores in 1990-91
witnessed a significant increase after the liberalisation of the economy as a whole and
the financial sector in particular. The GDS increased four-fold, i.e, `. 5,15,545 cores
in 2000-01. This was mainly because of the overcoming of the financial repressionist
policies and deregulating of interest rates and financial institutions. It has been
witnessing an increasing trend since then and was `. 28,24,459 crores in 2011-12 But
total GDS suffered a set-back in the backdrop of the global financial crisis which the
Indian economy witnessed during 2007-08 (from `. 18,36,332 to `. 18,02,620). The
household sector has been the main contributor to the GDS (`. 20, 54,737 crores in
2011-12), the next largest contribution comes from the private corporate sector
(`. 6,58,428).
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
-500,000
Source: Table-3.1
83
4. Risk Function: The financial markets provide protection against life, health and
income risks. These guarantees are accomplished through the sale of life, health
insurance and property insurance policies.
6
Gurley J G and E S Shaw (1960), Money in a Theory of Finance, The Brookings Institutions, Washington D.C., p.94.
84
7
Sethuraman T V (1970), Institutional Finance and Economic Development in India, Vikas Publications, New Delhi.
8
Op.cit, Khan M Y, p.4.
85
The volume of capital formation depends upon the intensity and efficiency
with which these activities are carried on. Financial system helps to promote these
activities.
In the process of capital formation, financial system helps not only in effective
mobilisation of savings from a large number of scattered masses and canalisation of
these savings into the most desirable and productive forms of investment but also
affect the growth of real savings through their numerical spread over sections of
population approached, accessibility, popularity, nature and extent of facilities offered
and the rate of interest paid on deposits. The financial system, thus, helps to promote
the process of capital formation by bringing together the supply of savings and
demand for investible funds.9
9
Joshi M S (1965), Financial Intermediaries in India, P.C. Manaktala and Sons Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, p. 29.
10
Schumpeter, J A (1949), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, p. 74
86
created purchasing power by banks placed in the hands of the entrepreneur enables
him to secure command over physical resources and thus push through his investment
projects. Once the investment results in increased production, the initial credit
inflation disappears and the equivalence between money and commodities streams is
restored. Both Kalecki and Keynes regarded the availability of finance as a key factor
in ensuring independence of investment from savings. Schumpeter had vehemently
emphasised the crucial role of credit institutions in the financing of innovations and
thus facilitating economic development.
and
Financial Markets
Primary Securities Primary
Securities
11
Memorandum of IBRD to the Report of U.N. on , Methods of Financing Economic Development in Underdeveloped
Countries, 1949, New York.
88
In the 1950s and 1960s, Gurley and Shaw (1955 12, 196013) and Goldsmith
(1969) 14 discussed the stages in the evolution of financial systems. According to
them, there is a link between per capita income and the development of a financial
system. At low levels of development, most investment is self-financed and financial
intermediaries do not exist, as the costs of financial intermediation are relatively high
compared to benefits. As countries develop and per capita income increases, bilateral
borrowing and lending take place, leading to the birth of financial intermediaries. The
number of financial intermediaries grows with further increases in per capita income.
Among the financial intermediaries, banks tend to become larger and prominent in
financial investment. As countries expand economically, non-bank financial
intermediaries and stock markets grow in size and tend to become more active and
efficient compared to banks. There is a general tendency for a financial system to
become more market-oriented as countries become richer.
12
Gurley John G and Edward Stone Shaw (1955), "Financial Aspects of Economic Development", The American Economic
Review, Volume XLV, No. 4, September, (pp 515-538).
13
Gurley John G and Edward Stone Shaw (1960), Money in a Theory of Finance, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution.
14
Goldsmith W Raymond (1969), Financial Structure and Development, Yale University Press, Princeton N.J, p.7.
89
evolution of financial system in India owes much to its locational advantage providing
geopolitical and commercial avenues. During the colonial days too, it served as an
entrepot for regions and for the flourishment of trade. The process of financial
development in independent India hinged effectively on the development of
commercial banking, with the impetus given to industrialisation based on the
initiatives provided in the five year plans. Financing of emerging trade and industrial
activities during the 'fifties' and the 'sixties' reflected the dominance of banking as the
critical source. The First Five Year Plan Document15 emphasised that as part of price
policy, both financial and physical controls were necessary. It also recognised the
importance of the creation of financial infrastructure by the central bank in the
development process. The First five Year Plan Document stated that "Central
banking in a planned economy can hardly be confined to the regulation of overall
supply of credit or to a somewhat negative regulation of the flow of bank credit. It
would have to take on a direct and active role, firstly in creating or helping to create
the machinery needed for financing developmental activities all over the country and
secondly ensuring that the finance available flows in the direction intended"16.
However, the turning point was the nationalisation of Reserve Bank of India
and the enactment of the Banking Regulation Act in 1949. The number of banks and
branches had gone up, notwithstanding the consolidation of small banks, and the
support given to co-operative credit movement. Functionally, banks catered to the
needs of the organised industrial and trading sectors. The primary sector consisting of
'agriculture, forestry and fishing', which formed more than 50 per cent of GDP during
15
Government of India, First Five Year Plan Document (1950), Planning Commission, p. 37
16
Ibid, First Five Year Plan (1950), p. 38.
17
Government of India, Second Five Year Plan (1956), Planning Commission, p. 21.
90
this period had to depend largely on self financing and on sources outside the
commercial banks like money lenders and indigenous bankers. It is against this
backdrop that the process of financial development was given impetus with the
adoption of the policy of social control over banks in 1967, further reinforced in 1969
by the nationalisation of 14 major scheduled commercial banks. Since then, the
banking system has formed the core of the Indian Financial system. Driven largely by
public sector initiative and policy activism, commercial banks have a dominant share
in the total financial assets and are the main source of finance for the private corporate
sector. They also channel a sizeable share of household savings to the public sector.
Besides, in recent years, they have been performing most of the payment system
functions. With increased diversification in recent years, banks in both public and
private sectors have been providing a wide range of financial services.
In the three decades following the first wave of bank nationalisation (the
second wave consisted of six commercial banks in 1980), the number of scheduled
commercial banks has quadrupled and the number of bank branches has increased
eight-fold. Aggregate deposits of scheduled commercial banks have also increased.
The financial system outside the banks has also exhibited considerable dynamism.
The system today is varied, with a well-diversified structure of financial institutions,
financial companies and mutual funds. The setting up of some specialised financial
institutions and refinance institutions during last three decades and the onset of
reforms from about the early nineties, provided depth to financial intermediation
outside the banking sector. These developments, coupled with increased financial
market liberalisation, have enhanced competition. Financial development is also
reflected in the growing importance of mutual funds. Capital markets themselves
have become an important source of financing corporatized investments.
Financial structure refers to shape, components and their order in the financial
system. A well-structured financial system is a precondition to economic growth. The
structure of the financial system becomes important in determining the nature of
growth. The Indian financial system has made rapid strides in facilitating
intermediation, innovation of new instruments and institutions. The structure of
Indian Financial System is depicted in (Chart-3.(iii)). It can be broadly classified into
the formal (organised) financial system and the Informal (unorganised) financial
system. The formal financial system comes under the purview of the Ministry of
Finance (MoF), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board
of India (SEBI) and other regulatory bodies. The informal financial system consists
of:
Money Lenders
3. Financial Instruments 4. Financial Services Pawn Brokers
1. Financial Institutions and Traders
Financial Intermediaries 2. Financial Markets Land Lords
Local Banks
92
Exchanges
The formal financial system in India consists of four components i.e., (i)
Financial Institutions, (ii) Financial Markets, (iii) Financial Instruments and (iv)
Financial Services. The Institutional structure of the Indian financial system is shown
in Chart 3.(iv)
Public
Sector
Banking Non-Banking Mutual Insurance &
Institutions Institutions Funds Housing
Finance
Private Companies
Sector
Scheduled Scheduled
Commercial Banks Cooperative
Banks Non-Bank Development
Financial Companies Financial Institutions
Public Private Foreign Regional All India F.I.s: State Level Other
IFCI, IDBI, SIDBI,
Sector Sector Banks in Rural IDFC, NABARD, F.I's: SFC's, F.I's
Banks Banks India Banks EXIM BANK, SIDC's ECGC,
NHB DICGC
Source: Chart-3.(iii).
Financial Institutions are intermediaries that mobilise savings and facilitate the
allocation of funds in an efficient manner. Financial institutions can be classified as
banking and non-banking financial institutions. Banking institutions are creators and
purveyors of credit while non-banking financial institutions are purveyors of credit.
While the liabilities of banks are part of the money supply, this may not be true of
94
Total Assistance by
All - India Specialized
Investment Financial Percentage
Category Term Lending Financial
Institutions@ Institutions variation
Institutions* Institutions#
(2+3+4)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Year S D S D S D S D S D
2004-05 9,091 6,279 111 72 10,404 8,972 19,606 15,323
2005-06 11,975 9,287 133 88 15,558 11,771 27,666 21,146 41 38
2006-07 11,102 10,225 0 0 18,862 27,757 29,964 37,982 12.9 82.8
2007-08 18,696 17,379 366 189 39,670 28,460 58,732 46,028 86.2 14.6
2008-09 33,232 31,629 597 283 71,400 62,357 1,05,229 94,269 70.2 93.3
2009-10 42,552 37,987 590 320 63,637 53,762 1,06,779 92,069 3.4 -0.9
2010-11 48,010 47,200 900 500 45,000 40,100 1,00,400 87,800 2.9 14.15
2011-12 54,500 47,490 1,090 850 54,410 51,970 1,03,510 1,00,310 -5 -4.5
Note: S = Sanctions, and D = Disbursements
* Relating to IFCI, SIDBI and IIBI
# Relating to IVCF, ICICI Venture and TFCI.
@ Relating to LIC and GIC and erstwhile subsidiaries (NIA, UIIC and OIC)
Source: Reserve Bank of India, Report on Trend and Progress of Banking India, Compiled from
various issues
Besides DFIs at both the all-India and state levels, there are also investment
institutions and specialised financial institutions. These institutions provided financial
assistance in the form of term loans, underwriting/direct subscription to
shares/debentures and guarantees.18 There has been a secular increase in the sanctions
and disbursements (Table 3.2) of financial institutions. Financial assistance
sanctioned and disbursed by AIFIs exhibited a steady trend in 2005-06. The gap
between sanctioned and disbursed amounts also narrowed down. During 2006-07, the
disbursements were larger than the sanctions. The financial assistance sanctioned by
financial institutions accelerated sharply during 2007-08 as against the deceleration
witnessed during the previous year. The acceleration in sanctions was accounted for
mainly by investment institutions especially LIC. Therefore, on balance even though
both financial assistance sanctioned and disbursed by financial institutions increased
during 2007-08, the increase was more pronounced in respect of sanctions (86.2 per
cent) than the disbursements (14.6 per cent). However, the sanctions and
disbursements sharply increased during 2008-09 as compared to that in the previous
year. A major part of the increase in this was accounted for mainly by investment
institutions.
18
Reserve Bank of India, Report on Currency and Finance, 1999-2000.
96
120000
100000
80000
60000 Sanction
Disbursement
40000
20000
0
2004-052005-062006-072007-082008-092009-102010-112011-12
Source: Table-3.2.
Table 3.3 gives a clear picture of trends and progress of banking in India.
Illustratively, while the number of scheduled commercial banks has gone up
moderately until 2006 (222 branches) but thereafter it started declining, by 2012 there
were only 173 commercial banks. The number of bank branches has increased
manifold over the years, as a result of which the population per bank office improved
from 15,000 to 13,000 over the period. Both per capita deposit and per capita credit
has witnessed a rapid growth. While the deposit expanded from `. 9,770 in 2001 to
`.51,106 in 2012. The increase in other indicators like advances to priority sector,
credit-deposit ratio, investment-deposit ratio and cash-deposit ratio too was more
pronounced.
No. of
No. of COs registered Total Public Net Owned
Year Reporting
with RBI@ Assets* Deposits* Fund*
Companies
2001 13,815 981 53,878 18,085 4,943
2002 14,077 910 58,290 18,822 4,383
2003 13,849 875 58,071 20,100 7,950
2004 13,764 981 53,878 8,085 4,943
2005 13,261 573 52,900 20,246 5,510
2006 13,014 466 57,453 22,842 6,663
2007 12,968 362 71,171 24,665 8,601
2008 12,809 364 94,744 24,395 12,261
2009 12,740 336 97,408 21,548 13,458
2010 12,630 308 1,12,131 17,352 16,424
2011 12,409 297 1,16,897 11,964 17,975
@ This includes all NBFCs (both deposit taking and non-deposit taking)
* NBFCs include Deposit taking NBFCs (NBFCs-D), Mutual Benefit Financial Companies
(MBFCs) (Notified Nidhis), Mutual Benefits Companies (MBCs) (Potential Nidhis) etc. till
2004-05 and only NBFCs-D thereafter
Source: Karunagaran, (2011), "Inter-connectedness of Banks and NBFCs in India: Issues and Policy
Implications, RBI Working Paper Series, WPS (DEPR): 21/2011
UTI was the only mutual fund until 1987-88. As shown in Graph-3.C, the
resource mobilisation of UTI was 3.22 billion in 2000-0. It has been witnessing some
variation since then and was 46.29 billion in 2012-13. The bank sponsored mutual
funds and financial institution sponsored mutual funds also witnessed several
variations over the period. The private sector mutual funds commercial operations in
1993-94, and their growth though disappointing in some years, has been relatively
better than the others.
100
2000
Private Sector mutual funds
500
-500
-1000
Source: Table-3.5.
In the post-reforms era, the role and nature of activity of these financial
institutions have undergone a tremendous change. Banks have now undertaken non-
bank activities and financial institutions have taken up banking functions. Most of the
financial institutions now resort to financial markets for raising funds.
The main organised financial markets in India are the money market and the
capital market. The first is a market for short-term securities while the second is a
market for long-term securities, i.e., securities having a maturity period of one year or
more.
The role of stock markets as a source of economic growth has been widely
debated. It is well-recognised that stock markets influence economic activity through
the creation of liquidity. Liquid financial market was an important enabling factor
behind most of the early innovations that characterised the early phases of the
Industrial Revolution. Recent advancements in this area reveal that stock markets
remain an important conduit for enhancing development. Many profitable
investments necessitate a long-term commitment of capital, but investors might be
reluctant to relinquish control of their savings for long period. Liquid equity markets
make investments less risky and more attractive. At the same time, companies enjoy
permanent access to capital raised through equity issues. By facilitating long-term
102
and more profitable investments, liquid markets improve the allocation of capital and
enhance the prospects for long-term economic growth. Furthermore, by making
investments relatively less risky, stock market liquidity can also lead to more savings
and investments.
Chart-3.(v): Market Structure of Indian Financial System
Indian Financial System
2. Financial Markets
Source: Chart-3.(iii)
Over the years the stock market in India has become strong. The number of
stock exchanges increased from 8 in 1971 to more than 20 at present. The number of
listed companies also moved up. The market capitalisation (Table 3.6) which is also
the market value is the share price times the number of shares outstanding as a
percentage of GDP has decreased from 106.9 per cent in 2000-01 to 40.3 per cent in
2011-12, it further decreased to 33.98 per cent in 2012-13 on account of the variations
in the global stock markets. Though the Indian stock market was founded more than a
century ago, it remained quite dominant from independence in 1947. The traded total
value which refers to the total value of shares traded during the period. This indicator
complements the market capitalisation ratio by showing whether market size is
matched by trading. The stock market total value added as a percentage of GDP
increased considerably from 31 per cent in 2000-01 to 68.9 per cent in 2012-13.
103
350
300
250
200
150 Stock Market Capitalisation
Source: Table-3.6.
104
Over the years, the Indian capital market has experienced a significant
structural transformation, in that it now compares well with those in developed
markets. This was deemed necessary because of the gradual opening of the economy
and the need to promote transparency in alternative sources of financing. The
regulatory and the supervisory structure has been overhauled with the powers for
regulating the capital market being vested with the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI).
Financial securities are financial instruments that are negotiable and tradable.
Financial securities may be primary or secondary securities. Primary securities are
also termed as direct securities as they are directly issued by the ultimate borrowers of
funds to the ultimate savers. Examples of primary or direct securities include equity
shares and debentures. Secondary securities are also referred to as indirect securities,
as they are issued by the financial intermediaries to the ultimate savers. Bank
deposits, mutual fund units, and insurance policies are secondary securities.
Financial Instruments
Term Type
Short
Medium
Long Primary Secondary
Securities Securities
Services that help with borrowing and funding, lending and investing, buying
and selling securities, making and enabling payments and settlements, and managing
risk exposures in financial markets. The major categories of financial services are
funds intermediation, payments mechanism, provision of liquidity, risk management,
and financial engineering. (Chart 3.(vii))
Funds intermediating services link the saver and borrower which, in turn,
leads to capital formation. New channels of financial intermediation have come into
existence as a result of information technology. Payment services enable quick, safe,
and convenient transfer of funds and settlement of transactions.
Financial services are necessary for the management of risk in the increasingly
complex global economy. They enable risk transfer and protection from risk. Risk
can be defined as a chance of loss. Risk transfer of services help the financial market
participants to move unwanted risks to others who will accept it. The speculators who
take on the risk need a trading platform to transfer this risk to other speculators. In
addition, market participants need financial insurance to protect themselves from
various types of risks such as interest rate fluctuations and exchange rate risk.
The producers of these financial services are financial intermediaries, such as,
banks, insurance companies, mutual funds, and stock exchanges. Financial
intermediaries provide key financial services such as merchant banking, leasing, hire
purchase, and credit-rating. Financial services rendered by the financial
intermediaries bridge the gap between lack of knowledge on the part of investors and
the increasing sophistication of financial instruments and markets. These financial
services are vital for creation of firms, industrial expansion, and economic growth.
Financial Services
Depositories Custodial
Credit Rating
Factoring
Merchant Banking
Leasing
Hire Purchase
Portfolio Management
Underwriting
Source: Chart-3.(iii)
108
Financial intermediaries have close links with the financial markets in the
economy. Financial institutions acquire, hold, and trade financial securities which not
only help in the credit-allocation process but also makes the financial markets larger,
more liquid, stable, and diversified. Financial intermediaries rely on financial markets
to raise funds whenever the need arises. This increases the competition between
financial markets and financial intermediaries for attracting investors and borrowers.
The development of new sophisticated markets has led to the development of complex
securities, portfolios, and strategies require financial expertise which financial
intermediaries provide through financial services.
19
Op.cit. Pathak, Bharti V, (2009) The Indian Financial System.
20
Subarao, Duvvuri (2009), Should Banking be made Boring?-An Indian Perspective, Keynote address by Governor, Reserve
Bank of India at the International Finance and Banking Conference organised by the Indian Merchant's Chamber of 'Banking-
Crisis and Beyond' on November 25, 2009, Mumbai, RBI Bulletin.
109