Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
LatestLaws.com
1
REPORTABLE
VERSUS
WITH
VERSUS
WITH
VERSUS
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
DEEPAK SINGH
M/S. TRUSSES AND TOWERS (P) LTD.
Date: 2019.01.24
10:03:47 IST
...RESPONDENT(S)
Reason:
LatestLaws.com
WITH
VERSUS
J U D G M E N T
ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.
C.A.Nos.8442-8443 of 2016
(M/s. Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. & Anr. vs. Assam State
Electricity Board & Ors.)
law:
the Act, the appeal filed by the Board was thus allowed
appellants.
LatestLaws.com
Board. The High Court held that all the bills raised by
payment.
10
effect from 23.04.1993 and the whole sum was paid upto
11
12
13
14
15
16
79 and 80:
17
18
retrospective operation.
LatestLaws.com
19
20
maintainable.
LatestLaws.com
21
High Court.
22
payment.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
23.09.1992.
31
35. Section 4 which deals with date from which and rate
Section 3.
32
33
38:
34
35
36
37
42. The Court further held that there was neither any
38
paragraphs 45-46:
39
40
applicable.
41
42
Bench.
Issue NO.1
43
44
45
46
Act.
Issue No.2
47
following words:
48
49
down:
50
was promulgated.
retroactive.
Issue No.3
51
52
53
“Issue No.2: -
54
55
56
57
58
59
time.
67. The Trial court has held that suit is not barred by
60
61
62
63
due.
64
65
Association.
barred by time.
Issue No.4
issue.
LatestLaws.com
66
Issue No. 5
67
Issue No.6
68
not returned any finding that all the bills were not
permitted.
69
Issue No.7
70
71
72
already held that the mere fact that supply orders were
73
......................J.
(A. K. SIKRI)
......................J.
(ASHOK BHUSHAN)
......................J.
(S.ABDUL NAZEER)
NEW DELHI,
JANUARY 23, 2019