Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TP
NP TP => T'
Mothers
T AP
are
[EPP] NP A’
Experiencer Mothers
Stimulus
A PP
Tense has a EPP feature, which is semantically uninterpretable, there for it has to be
cancelled via feature-checking.
EPP(final law): T has to merge in specifier position with the copy of it’s closest nominal from it’s c-command
domain
The 2 mothers use the same index to show that the 2 are the same
TP
Mothers
T AP
are
[EPP] NP A’
Experiencer Mothers
A PP Stimulus
NP k TP T’
Jane
T VP
has
[EPP] VP AdvP
copy, move =
the closest one!
recently
NP tk V’
Agent
Jane
V DP Theme
eliminate
borrowed this book
[uN] Agent
[uN] Theme
LF: -> create a logical chain between the item that preserves pronunciation and it’s equivalent that had it’s
pronunciation deleted
Tense auxiliary and the lexical verb
TP
NP k TP T’
John
T VP
gave i
[EPP]
VP AdjP
NP tk V’ yestarday
Agent
John V’ PP
Beneficiary
V DP
to Maria
LF
Theme
:
PF: gave -> ti
the book by Chomsky
[uN] Agent
[uN] Theme
[uN] Beneficiary
[T]
ed is tense
TP
NP k TP T’
John
T VP
show i - ed
[EPP]
VP AdvP
NP V’
tk yestarday
Agent
LF:
PF: John
V’ PP
Beneficiary
V DP to Maria