You are on page 1of 1

Facts: Ah Chong was a cook in Ft. McKinley. He was afraid of bad elements.

One evening, before


going to bed, he locked himself in his room by placing a chair against the door. After having
gone to bed, he was awakened by someone trying to open the door. He called out twice, “Who
is there,” but received no answer. Fearing that the intruder was a robber, he leaped from his
bed & called out again, “If you enter the room I will kill you.” But at that precise moment, he
was struck by the chair that had been placed against the door, & believing that he was being
attacked he seized a kitchen knife & struck & fatally wounded the intruder who turned out to
be his roommate.

Held: Ah Chong must be acquitted because of mistake of fact.

Ratio: Had the facts been as Ah Chong believed them to be, he would have been justified in
killing the intruder under A11, par. 1, of the RPC, which requires, to justify the act, that there
be:

? unlawful aggression on the part of the person killed,

? reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it, &

? lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself

If the intruder was really a robber, forcing his way into the room of Ah Chong, there would have
been unlawful aggression on the part of the intruder. There would have been a necessity on the
part of Ah Chong to defend himself and/or his home. The knife would have been a reasonable
means to prevent or repel such aggression. And Ah Chong gave no provocation at all. Under
A11 of the RPC, there is nothing unlawful in the intention as well as in the act of the person
making the defense.

You might also like