Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laboratory Manual
Course Programme on
Management of Soil Health: Challenges and
Opportunities
(29th September to 19th October, 2014)
R.K. Thakur
S.S. Baghel
G.D. Sharma
P.C. Amule
N. Chouhan
Sponsored by
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Organized by
Department of Soil Science and Agril. Chemistry
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya
Jabalpur – 482 004 (M.P.)
INDEX
Appendix - I to VI 52-59
CAFT on Management of Soil Health: Challenges and Opportunities” 29 Sept. to 19 Oct. 2014
Assessment of a soils fertility status involves (ii) To determine the specific soil problem
such as an acidity, alkalinity and sodicity
an estimation of its available nutrient status
if exist. Subsequently giving
i.e. the portion or amount of nutrient directly
recommendation for their correction
available in soil for subsequent uptake by
(Lime/Gypsum requirement etc.)
crop plant. This exercise commonly referred
(iii) To predict the probability of getting
to as soil testing and is used to arrive at
maximum response of crops to
optimum fertilizer application ratio. The need
fertilizers.
for estimation of available nutrient arises
because only a small fraction of what the soil Procedure for soil testing
contains is the total nutrient content of the
The procedure for testing the soil to
soil. Soil test are calibrated by correlating
meet these objectives is divided into the
them with crop response and the result from
following phases:
the basis for making fertilizer
(i) Collection of soil samples and its
recommendations.
preparation
Estimation of nutrient contents and
(ii) Extraction and determination of nutrients
forms in materials that are involved in
and physico-chemical properties of the
nutrient supply and dynamics is a conical step
soil.
towards planning scientific nutrient
(iii) Interpretation of analytical results.
management. In this content, both soil and
(iv) Recommendation and follow up of
plant testing information comes out of the
results and evaluation of
interpretation of analysis assumes a greater
recommendations.
value when their concentrations and amounts
can relate to soil fertility, nutrient availability, Soil testing is a chemical method for
plant growth, yield and quality of the crop estimation of nutrient supplying power of a
produce. soil/ soil fertility evaluation.
Why soil testing ? Soil fertility may be defined as the
• Soil fertility status assessment involves an capacity of soil to furnish available plant
estimation of its available nutrient status. nutrients to the plants in proper amount and
It gives the amount of nutrient directly appropriate balance, under ideal condition of
available in soil for subsequent uptake by plant growth. Whereas, Soil productivity is
crop plant. the capacity of soil to produce under specific
condition of crop production.
• Guides to arrive at optimum fertilizer
application. Advantages of soil testing :
• It is a method of evaluating nutrient status More rapid method as compare to
(physico-chemical properties) of the soil biological or deficiency symptoms/ plant
i.e. the assessment of the fertility of the analysis.
soil to determine nutrient deficiencies. One may determine the need of the soil
• It is also concerned with environmental before the planting of crop.
quality for the community hazards. To determine the suitability of the soil
Objectives for laying gardens.
To evaluate soil fertility and its productivity Lime problems.
by the estimation of level of nutrient (Low, Soil survey.
Medium, High). The error in soil sampling in a field is
(i) Grouping of soil for their classification generally greater than the error in laboratory
analysis. The most recommendation call for Depending on field conditions and the
soil testing of each field is about every three objective of sampling, select proper
years with more frequent testing on lighter sampling tool (s).
soils. Therefore, it is necessary that the soil Based on difference in soil type, colour,
sample should be representative of the area. crop growth or slope, divide the area in
Further, the subsequent handling operation in different homogenous units.
the laboratory should be carefully performed
because a minute quantity (1 – 10g) of the
large soil mass of the field is actually used for
the analysis in the laboratory. Unless one is
sure of representative and proper sampling,
the results obtained in the laboratory analysis
will be of no use under the field conditions.
Apparatus and materials : DIVISION OF AREA
Khurpi
In the uniform field, demarket the
Spade
sampling points in a zig zag fashion or
Augers
randomly in such a way that the whole
Plastic bowl
field should be covered i.e. about 30-35
Scale
sample per ha.
Rack
Wooden roller
Mortar and pestle
Sieve
Polythene/paper/cloth bags
Labels
Card board cartons
Aluminium boxes
SELECTION OF SAMPLING POINTS
After collecting at least 30 – 35 primary When labels are hand written special
samples, mix all the samples in plastic bowl care should be taken to prevent ambiguity.
thoroughly and draw about ½ to 1 kg For arabic numbers “6” and “9” and
composite sample by quartering method. combination like “69” and “96” should be
Label the sample in the bowl and divide the under line, and ‘1’ and ‘7’ should be clearly
sample approximately 4 equal part. Discard distinguished. Where letters & numbers are
the 2 opposite portions of the samples and used ‘5’ may be easily confused with ‘S’.
remaining 2 portions are again thoroughly This is why printed labels are always better.
mixed and again divided in to 4 equal parts Field samplers have their own
and 2 opposite parts again discarded. This numbering system and may have record book
procedure is continue until ½ to 1 kg sample containing printed forms for entry of
remain in the bowl. This is known as information serially numbered. These ‘sample
composite sample which is true representative number’ are main identification of soil for
of the area. most purposes but the relevant form should
The most suitable containers for soil also have a record of the ‘bag number’ and
samples are polythene bags 6x9’’ made subsequent ‘laboratory number’.
of film about 0.13 mm thick, which may When a box of samples is dispatched
be sealed by twisting or tying the neck or to the laboratory, it should contain a packing
by mean of rubber bands or adhesive note giving the total number of sample,
tape. ‘sample number’ of each sample and its
If the soil is to be kept in moist condition corresponding ‘bag number’, the depth of soil
for moisture determination, bacterial sample from profile pit and other information
count and nitrate estimation etc. air tight needed by the laboratory staff for registration
containers are preferred. purposes, particularly on the analysis
If the soil to be used for the estimation of required. A duplicate packing note should be
micronutrients like Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn. Use of sent separately so that missing boxes can be
metallic tools should be avoided. Use sharp investigated.
stick or stainless steel. Brass sieve should be On arrival of the soil samples at the
avoided. Nylon net or aluminum sieve should laboratory, the content of a box should be
be used. checked against the packing note if any
In majority of cases, large stones and discrepancies should be reported to the
pieces of gravel (7.6 – 2mm) can be sampler. The samples are register in
discarded. Soil is broken up and spread out in laboratory giving each sample a ‘laboratory
a thin layer on strong paper or polythene film, number’ for particular analysis.
preferably on a rack of wire mesh to allow air Small laboratory simply the
to circulate. The drying area protected from numbered serially as they arrive. Larger
direct sun and wind. laboratory may have 2 or more numbering
Soil samples should be labelled/ system, using a prefixed letter (group of
numbered by field staff with water proof ink letter) to distinguish them. This procedure
or paint. These bag numbers being entered in helping to channel samples into various
the sampler’s record books, as each sample is analytical stream. Larger laboratory may need
taken together with other information. He to ‘punched card system’ or other means of
needs to identify and describe the samples. storing complete information on all samples.
If labels are used, they should either So that can be recovered quickly.
printed numbers on them already or water It is essential to keep a record of the
proof ink should be used to write information date of arrival and the source of all samples.
on them (this excludes pencil, washable ink A table can be drawn up for each month.
pens and ball point pens). Duplicate labels Information sheet: The soil sample thus
should be placed between the two bags, never collected must be furnished important
in the bag with the soil. The information on a information like –
label should be kept to a minimum preferably 1. Sample number
a number which may be either a ‘bag number’ 2. Name and address of the farmers.
or ‘sample number’. Depth may be given 3. Details of the field and site. Local name
usefully for soil profile samples. of field, Khasra no etc.
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur – 482004 (M.P.) 3
CAFT on Management of Soi l Health: Challenges and Opportunities” 29 Sept. to 19 Oct. 2014
beaker containing digested residue. Heat heat it to warm. Take a clean 100 ml
the contents gently on a hot plate until volumetric flask fitted with a funnel lined
white fumes appear. Remove the beaker with Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Transfer
and let it cool. Then, add 10ml of glass the contents of the beaker into the funnel
distilled water and heat the contents to and collect the filtrate in the volumetric
dissolve the residue. flask. Then, add another 5ml of conc. HCl
Take a 100ml clean volumetric into the beaker to dissolve the remaining
flask fitted with a funnel lined with residue in the beaker. Transfer the
Whatman No. 1 paper. Transfer the solution into the same funnel, collecting
contents of the beaker into the funnel the filtrate in the same volumetric flask.
using a glass rod collecting the filtrate in Repeat subsequent washing of the
the volumetric flask. Rinse the beaker contents of the beaker with small portions
with about 15ml portions of glass distilled of 6N HCl and transfer the washing into
water and transfer each rinsing into the the same funnel until the filtrate reaches
funnel in order to transfer the digested 100ml mark. Similarly run a blank
residue quantitatively. Collect the filtrate digestion and then prepare test solution
from each washing into the same using conc. And 6N HCl instead of glass
volumetric flask. Then wash the residue distilled water as described above.
on filter paper with small portions of glass Reference :
distilled water and collect the washing
Amma, M.K. 1990. Plant and Soil
until the volume of filtrate reaches 100ml
Analysis. Rubber Research
mark. Stopper the flask, label it and then
Institute, Rubber Board,
preserve it for the elemental analysis other
Kottayam-686009 (Keral).
than Ca, Mg and S. similarly run a blank
Jones (Jr) J. Benton. 1972. Plant Tissue
digestion and subsequently prepare the
Analysis for Micronutrients pp.
blank test solution following the above
319-348. In j.J. Mortvedt et. al.
mentioned procedure.
(ed.) Micronutrients in
If Ca and Mg is to be determined, add 5ml Agriculture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.,
of conc. HCl instead of glass distilled Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
water into the beaker containing the plant
digested residue. Swirl the contents and
against each other, developing a "lentil" approaches or reaches the surface. If diapir
angular blocky structure with and gilgai occur, the mound in gilgai is
slickenside features on the pad surfaces. always developed over the diapir.
(b) Shear stress development : The Hallsworth and Beckman (1969)
slipping occurs where shear strength is classified gilgai into 6 types i.e. normal or
surpassed by shear stress acting upon a round, melon hole, Lattice, Linear or wavy,
soil mass. The shear stress is a major tank or stony but later on Paton (1974)
force caused by swelling and develops suggested only two types of gilgai i.e. linear
when volume expansion results during and circular (Nuram or Pockmarked) each
the wet cycle. of which were grouped into 4 types.
(c) Formation of slickensides : The type - Mound and depression equally
slickensides, intersecting or close developed (No shelf present)
enough to intersect, also result in wedge type - Mound of much greater
shaped structural aggregates, the most extent than depression (No shelf present)
characteristics feature of Vertisols type - Depression of much greater
which develop with their longitudinal extent than mound (No shelf present)
axes inclined at 30 to 60° from type - Mound, shelf and depression all
horizontal (Sehgal and Bhattacharjee, present
1988). 2. Size of cyclic pedons : Half cycle
(d) Buckeling of land space : This linear distance (HCLD) measures the lateral
expansion buckles the land scape, dimension of a cyclic pedon. It may be
forming the micro relief called gilgai. small, medium or large i.e. below 1, 1 to 2
The micro basins contain more organic or above 2 to 3.5 meter, respectively.
matter than the micro ridges and 3. Horizon sequence : In Vertisols,
probably it results from admixtures of the horizon sequence has been suggested to
subsurface material into micro ridge be A1-Bss-BC-C where "ss" indicates about
area and slight erosion of organic rich the presence of slickensides.
fines from the ridges to the basins. 4. Thickness of horizon : Thickness
3. Incomplete leaching : In most of A1 in Vertisols varies with the linear
shrink swell soils, the temperature being frequencies of puffs and shelves of gilgai
high, the potential evapotranspiration micro relief.
suggesting incomplete leaching and 5. Horizon boundary (Amplitude): It
inducing the process of calcification in is the difference between vertical distance
these soils. from the surface of pedon to the lower
Cyclic movement of soil material : boundary of crest of cycle and the lowest
Amongst several processes acting in point of trough of cycle in same pedon. The
the formation of Vertisols, the predominant amplitudes are grouped as low, medium of
process seems to be haploidization i.e. high according to the vertical distance as
mixing by argilli pedoturbation. The below 25, 25 to 75 or above 75 cm,
specific features of such soils are : respectively. Shape of apparent topography
1. Gilgai micro relief : The term of the intermittent horizon is also graded as
gilgai is an Australian aboriginal term tongued (vertical extent > horizontal
meaning small water hole. distance), wavy (vertical extent
Pedogenic micro topographical approximating the horizontal distance) and
features like puffs (microknolls) and smooth (vertical extent < horizontal
shelves (micro basins) develop that remain distances) as suggested by Bartelli (1971).
intimately associated with one another Age of Vertisols :
(Bhattacharjee et al. 1977), Columbe et al. It is difficult to assign the Vertisols
(1996) introduced a term "diapir" meaning a place in the genetic scheme of soil
a protusion of subjacent soil material which classification as there are greater
penetrates to the overlying horizons and differences of opinion whether they are old,
A recent advance is nuclear technology content of three soils. The samples were
which has evolved methods for the non placed between a cesium source and
destructive determination of the soil water detector and then between americium to
content. Two methods have been used using a combined source but neither
with success. One the neutron scattering Soanenor other workers (Gardner and
method and the other is the y-radiation Calissendoff, 1967; Gardner, Campbell
method. and Calissendaff, 1969) have attempted to
Neutron method : In this method combine the sources in a single collimator
measurement is made of the number of because the higher energy gamma
hydrogen nuclear that are present per unit photons produce Compton scatter through
volume of soil and therefore, water interaction with the sample and some of
content by volume θ, is measured. this Compton scatter will be counted as
Neutrons are uncharged particles having gamma rays from the lower energy
almost the same mass as that of protons or source. The error can be eliminated by
that of hydrogen nuclei. A radium- with equipment and method evolved by
beryllium mixture in form of pellets is Corey, Peterson and Wakat, 1971). This
used as source of fast neutrons. The method is feasible for measuring the
measurement of soil water by the neutron water content and soil density of soil
method is essentially a measure of the columns simultaneously when two
density of the slowed neutron cloud sources are combined in a single
developing when Ra-Ba source is inserted collimator. Measurement of attenuation of
137
in the soil, the density of the slowed cesium and 241americium is done in this
neutrons being a measure of the soil water method. Radiation intensity (counts/min)
content by volume θ. after passage through the soil, container
and container alone is calculated by the
Simultaneous determination of bulk equation (Corey et al.) given in method.
density and water content : To obtain values of intensity the
With the increased interest in the equipment is required as shown in Fig. 1.
241
behavior of water in swelling soils and Am emits a large number of
resulting theoretical studies (Smile and gamma rays of various energies but the
Rosenthal, 1968; Philip, 1969) on the major energy is 59.6 KeV 241Am has a
subject, a method was required for half life of 458 years eliminating the need
measuring changes in both the water for decay corrections 137CS decays with a
content and soil density in order to gamma ray of 662 KeV and has a half life
experimentally evaluate these theoretical of 30 years.
analyses. Numerous authors have Detector and pulse height
proposed measuring the attenuation of analyzers are used in this system.
gamma rays of two different energies to Two methods were compared and
non destructively determine both water dual source method evaluated. Known
content and soil density in the same water content and soil densities were
sample. Soane (1967) illustrated the measured. The two soils were Houston
effectiveness of the dual gamma method black, a soil containing montmorillonitic
for measuring bulk density and water clay and cecil a soil containing kaolinitic
clay. The soil containing different amount Houston Black soil at the end of 24 hour
of water was packed to varying densities period but had infiltrated completely with
into plastic boxes 7.5 x 4.46 x 4.95 cm. the Cecil soil. The two soils responded
These boxes were placed between sources quite differently to the addition of water.
and detector with long axis parallel to Neither the soil density nor lengths of
beam. Comparisons between the known, Cecil soil column changed. The column
soil density. of Hoston black soil increased 2 cm in
Water content and values length and the soil density decreased in
determined by two methods for four cecil top 4 cm.
soil samples and five Hoston Black soil The combined source method is
samples are given in table 1. applicable to the study of swelling soils,
Table 1: Water content and values the phenomena of freezing and thawing
determined by twi methods. and measurement of water content and
density of the soil inside core barrels.
Water content g/cm3 Soil density g/cm3
References :
Known Calculated Known Calculated
Cecil soil Cerey, J.C., Peterson, S.F. and Wakat, M.A.
(1971). Measurement of attenuation
0.001 0.000 0.00 1.831 1.830 1.830
of 137CS and 241Am gamma rays for
0.044 0.081 0.073 1.712 1.711 1.720 soil density and water content
0.120 0.124 0.143 1.999 2.001 1.980 determinations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
0.175 0.118 0.151 2.050 2.067 2.081
Proc. Vol. 35 : 215-19.
Gardner, W.H. and Callissendortt, C.
Houston Black Soil (1967). Gamma rays and neutron
0.010 0.000 0.000 1.504 1.504 1.504 attenuation in measurement of soil
0.141 0.147 0.139 1.297 1.281 1.290 bulk density and water content. Pp
101-113. In Isotope and radiation
0.270 0.284 0.281 1.343 1.367 1.371
techniques in soil physics and
0.438 0.472 0.446 1.369 1.349 1.378 irrigation studies. International
0.495 0.532 0.514 1.297 1.234 1.255 atomic agency, Vienna.
Gaedner, W.H., Campbell, G.S. and
There is little difference between Calissendorff, C. (1969). Water
the results obtained by the two correction content and soil bulk density
techniques and method best suited will be measured concurrent using two
determined by the instrumentation gamma photon energies US AEC
available. Report, RLO 1543-6 Washington
Following satisfactory evaluation State University. Pullman Wash 42
of the dual source method for determining p.
the known water content and soil density Philip, J.R. (1969). Moisture equilibrium in
of soils, the method was used to the vertical in swelling soil. I Basic
determine water content and soil densities theory. Anst. J. Soil Res. 7 : 99-120.
of Houstan Black and Cecil soil columns Smiles, D.E. and Rosenthal, M.J. (1968).
following infiltration. More water was The movement of water in swelling
added to Houston soil because its greater material. Aust. J. Soil Res. 6 : 237-
water holding capacity. Twenty four 248.
hours following the addition of water the Soane, B.D. (1967). Dual energy gamma
transmission measurements were repeated ray transmission for coincident
measurement of water content and
and the water content and density was
dry bulk density of soil. Nature 214
calculated water remained ponded on
: 1273-1274.
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur – 482004 (M.P.) 13
CAFT on Management of Soil Health: Challenges and Opportunities” 29 Sept. to 19 Oct. 2014
Calculations :
R (Titer reading - Blank reading) × Normality of acid
× Atomic weight of nitrogen × Weight of one hectare of soil
Available N (kg ha-1) =
Sample weight (g) x 1000
R × 0.02 × 14 × 2.24 × 106
=
5 x 1000
Factor = R x 125.44
Interpretation of results :
Available N (kg ha-1) Soil rating
< 280 : Low
280-560 : Medium
> 560 : High
R x 0.1 x 14 x 100
= 1 x 1000
Factor = R x 0.14
Crude protein content : References :
The total nitrogen is estimated by Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G. L. (1956).
micro-Kjeldahl method as per procedure A rapid procedure for the
suggested by AOAC (1995) and the crude estimation of nitrogen in soils.
protein is calculated by the following Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
formula:
Crude protein content (%) = micro- AOAC, (1995). Official Methods of
Kjeldahl nitrogen content (%) x 6.25 Analysis. 16th edn. Association of
(based on the assumptions that nitrogen Official Analytical Chemists,
constitutes 16 % of protein). Washington, DC.
NITROGEN ANALYZER
Spectrophotometer
about 22 mL, stopper the flask and Determination of total sulphur in plant:
shake well. Sulphur is an essential plant
5. Shake the BaSO4 seed suspension and nutrient and occurs in many different
then add 0.5 mL of it and 0.2 g of forms. The procedure for total sulphur
BaCl2 crystals. Stopper the flask and estimation is as follows :
invert three times and keep.
6. After 10 minutes, invert 10 times and Digestion of plant material :
keep. After another 5 minutes, invert 5 Take one gram of plant material in
times. digestion flask. Add 10-15 ml of Diacid
7. Allow to stand for 15 minutes and (3:1: Nitric acid : Perchloric acid) mixture
then add 1 mL of gum acacia-acetic and swirl the content in 150 ml
acid solution. volumetric flask. Place the content on hot
8. Make up the volume, invert three plate till the digestion is over. Filter the
times and keep aside for 90 minutes. solution in 100 ml conical flask, wash the
9. Invert 10 times and measure the residue on filter paper several times with
colour intensity at 440 nm (blue the hot water. Make up the volume with
filter). distilled water, store the solution in air
10. Run a blank side by side. tight container.
Preparation of standard curve for S : Estimation :
1. Place 2.5,5.0,7.5,10.0,12.5 and 15.0 Take 10 ml aliquot from extract
mL portions of the working standard and proceed as per the method described
solution (10 mg S L-1) into a series of under preparation of standard curve
25 mL volumetric flasks to obtain (Bardsley and Lancaster, 1960).
25,50,75,100,125 and 150 µg S.
2. Proceed to develop turbidity as Calculation :
described above for sample aliquots.
3. Read the colour intensity and prepare 5 µg = R
the curve by plotting readings against 1R = R/5 µg (Factor)
sulphur concentration (In µg in the
final volume of 25 mL) Total S (%) =
Factor x Sample R x1000 x 100 x 100
Calculation : -----------------------------------------------
1000 x 10 x 1
R x 100
Available S in soil (mg kg-1) = References :
10 x 20
Where, r stands for the quantity of S in Arora, C.L. and Bajwa, M.S. (1994).
mg as obtained on X-axis against a Curr. Sci. 66 : 314-316.
reading. Bardsley, C.S. and Lancaster, J.P. (1960).
Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 24 : 265.
Chesnin, L. and Yien, C.N. (1951). Proc.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 15 : 149.
All atoms can absorb light at certain thickness of the medium absorbs an equal
discrete wavelengths corresponding to the fraction of the light passing through it.
energy requirement of the particular atom. Beer’s Law : Light absorption is
When at ground state the atom absorbs proportional to the number of absorbing
light it is transformed into the excited atoms in the sample.
state. It is the same atom containing more The combined Beer - Lambert law may
energy. This energy is measured in be given as :
relation to the ground state and a It = Io – (abc)
particular excited state say for example in Io
case of Na may be 2.2 eV (electron volts) thus, log10 --- = abc = absorbance
above the ground state. It
Each transition between different Where,Io = incident radiation power
electronic energy states is characterized It = transmitted radiation power
by a different energy and by a different a = absorption coefficient
wavelength. These wavelengths are b = length of absorption path
sharply defined and when a range of c = concentration of absorbing
wavelengths is surveyed, each wavelength atoms
shows as a sharp energy maximum (a i.e. the absorbance is proportional
spectronic line). These characteristic lines to the concentration of the elements for a
distinguish atomic spectra. The lines, given absorption path length at any given
which originate in the ground state of wave length.
atom, are most often of interest in atomic In principle, it might be possible
absorption spectroscopy. These are called to calculate the concentration directly
the resonance lines. The atomic spectrum, from the above equation. In practice,
characteristic of each element, then however, the a and b are constants hence
comprises a number of discrete lines, the variation of results is directly related
some of which are resonance lines. Most the concentration of atoms. For analysis,
of the other lines arise from excited states the absorbance of different concentration
rather than the ground state. The lines of of standard solution is first measured with
excited states are not useful generally in the help of atomic absorption
atomic absorption analysis as most of the spectrophotometer and then the results of
atoms in a practical atomizer are found in unknown samples are compared with the
the ground state. standards and thus concentration of
The relationship of light absorbed unknown sample is calculated.
by the atom in ground state and their Atomic absorption spectrophotometer :
concentration in the solution is defined in Atomic absorption spectro-photo-
the fundamental laws of light absorptions. meter is based on the principle that when
Lambert’s Law : The portion of light atomic vapours of an element are
absorption by a transparent medium is irradiated by the radiation of a
independent of the intensity of the characteristic wavelength (i.e. the light
incidence light and each successive unit from a source whose emission lines are
absorbance is measured with the magnetic hot plate till the residue is colour less.
field off and the background with the field on. Now take off, cool dilute with
distilled water and filter through
(e) Soil analysis : Weigh 12.5g soil whatman No.1 filter paper. Make up
sample in 100 ml iodine value flasks. the volume of digestate to 50 ml.
Add 25 ml DTPA solution. Shake Read for micronutrient content on
this mixture for 2 hours on shaker at atomic absorption spectro-
70 to 80 oscillation per minute, filter photometer.
through acid washed distilled water
Factors : For soil multiply the
rinsed, whatman No.1 filter paper and
concentration read on AAS computer
collect the filtrate in plastic bottles.
sheet by “2”. Similarly for plants the
Determine the content of
multiplying factor will be 100 to get
micronutrients on atomic absorption
concentration in mg kg-1.
spectrophotometer.
(i) Plant analysis : Weigh 0.5g plant Reference :
sample in a conical flask (corning,
100 ml capacity). Add 10 to 12 ml of Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978).
di acid mixture (1 perchloric + 4 Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 42 :
nitric acid) and digest the mixture on 421-428.
Geographical information system (GIS) achieved, but it requires too much time
is an effective tool and a decision support and labour. To overcome such difficulty,
system involving the integration of GIS technique comes as a helping tool in
spatially referenced data in solving order to generate such comprehensive
environmental problem. With the help of maps and that too in a precise manner.
conventional methods it could be
Gamma irradiation has been extensively producer of fruits and vegetables live stock
used for food irradiation and sterilisation, and marine products. India has a
killing of fungus and micro organisms, tremendous potential as the world largest
sterilisation of medical accessories and food factory.
surgical equipments, high energy radiation It has been estimated that about 30-
chemistry, seed irradiation and 35% of fruit and vegetables of worth Rs
semiconductor irradiation. Gamma 3000/- corers are perished every year. The
reasons for such losses are seasonal nature
Chamber can also be used in many other
of fruits and vegetables production. The
research applications which require
long distance between production and
irradiation of materials with ionizing consumption centers and also rising gap
radiations to varying doses. between demand and supply. The hot and
The radiation processing of food humid climate in the country is also quite
involve the controlled application of energy favorable for the growth of numerous
from ionizing radiation such as gamma insects and micro organisms that destroy
rays, electrons and X rays for food stored crops and cause spoilage of food
preservation. The gamma rays and X-rays every year. The spoilage also occurs due to
are short wavelength radiation of chemical and physiological changes in
electromagnetic spectrum, which includes stored foods. To preserve the food and food
radiowaves, microwaves, infrared, visible, products, technologies such as freezing
and a violet light. Radioisotopes such as caning sun drying pickling fermentation
cobalt 60 and caesium-137 emit the gamma have been recommended by researchers but,
rays, while machines using electricity each of these methods have its own merits
generate electrons and X-rays. The gamma and limitation. The search for an alternative
rays and electrons are distinguished from newer economical methods to preserve food
other form of radiation by their ionizing and causes least changes in sensory quality
ability. (That they are able to break have been under taken since long back, and
chemical bond when absorbed by material). has been observed that radiation processing
The product of ionizing radiation may be of food is one of the latest method
electrically charged ions) or neutral (free developed for food preservation.
radicals). These there further react to cause
change in an irradiated material known as Irradiation by Gamma Chamber 5000 :
the process of radiolysis. It is this reaction Gamma Chamber 5000 is a
that causes the death of micro- organism, compact self shielded cobalt-60 gamma
insect and parasites during food irradiation.
irradiator providing an irradiation volume
The conservation and preservation
of approximately 5000cc. The material for
of food is a prerequisite for food security.
It provides self-reliance to nation. The
irradiation is placed in an irradiation
Indian Food Industries contributes about chamber located in the vertical drawer
25-28% towards GDP. The food processing inside the lead flask. This drawer can be
sector provides 60-65% employment with a moved up and down with the help of a
turnover of in US$ 36.1 billion of which system of motorised drive which enables
US$ 27.8 billion in organized sector, any precise positioning of the irradiation
change or any stagnation in technology will chamber at the centre of the radiation
inevitably have very large impact field.
throughout the economy. India is a potential
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur – 482004 (M.P.) 41
CAFT on Management of Soil Health: Challenges an d Opportunities” 29 Sept. to 19 Oct. 2014
high mutation frequency. Basic tool of Becquerel (Bq) : The SI unit of activity is the
nuclear technology for crop improvement becquerel (Bq). One becquerel is 1
is the use of ionizing radiation which disintegration per second. The common
causes induced mutations in plants. These multiple is the megabecquerel (1 mCi = 37
MBq).
mutations might be beneficial and have
higher economical values. Half –life: The time (t) taken for the
radioactivity of a sample to fall to half its
Measures of activity (A) : initial value.
The number of disintegrations, or t1/2= 0.693 / k
decay events, or nuclear transformations, in a Electron volt (eV): energy of radiation
sample per unit time is its activity A. Two (usually as mega electron volts (MeV).
common informal units are disintegrations per
leV=1.602x 10-19 J
second and disintegrations per minute.
Curie (Ci) : The US unit of activity is the Grays (Gy): Absorbed dose (where 1 Gy
curie (Ci). 3.7x1010 disintegrations per is the absorption of 1 J of energy per
second. Common multiples are the millicurie kilogram of food)
and microcurie. Previously rods (radiological unit) were
used. 1 rad = 10-2 J kg-1
the laminar air-flow and the tops of concentrations. Vitamins are organic
these bottles are tightened on cooling. substances that are parts of enzymes or
B. Filter sterilization: Some growth cofactors for essential metabolic
regulators like amino acids and functions. Sugar is essential for in vitro
vitamins are heat labile and get growth and development as most plant
destroyed on autoclaving with the rest cultures are unable to photosynthesize
of the nutrient medium. Therefore, it effectively for a variety of reasons.
Murashige & Skoog (1962) medium (MS)
is sterilized by filtration through a
is the most suitable and commonly used
sieve or a filtration assembly using
basic tissue culture medium for plant
filter membranes of 0.22 μm to regeneration.
0.45μm size. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) at
C. Laminar Airflow Cabinet: This is the a very low concentration (0.1 to 100 μM)
primary equipment used for aseptic regulate the initiation and development of
manipulation. This cabinet is used for shoots and roots on explants on semisolid
horizontal air-flow from the back to or in liquid medium cultures. The auxins
the front, Air is drawn in electric fans and cytokinins are the two most important
and passed through the coarse filter classes of PGRs used in tissue culture.
and then through the fine bacterial The relative effects of auxin and cytokinin
filter (HEPA). HEPA or High ratio determine the morphogenesis of
Efficiency Particulate Air Filter is an cultured tissues.
apparatus designed such that the air- Materials: Amber bottles, Plastic beakers
flow through the working place flows (100 ml, 500 ml and 1000 ml), Measuring
in direct lines (i.e. laminar flow). cylinders (500 ml), Glass beakers (50 ml),
Before commencing any experiment it Disposable syringes (5 ml), Disposable
is desirable to clean the working syringe filter (0.22 μm), Autoclaved
surface with 70% alcohol. eppendorf tubes (2 ml), Eppendorf stand,
Ex 2. Preparation of stock solutions of Benzyl-aminopurine (BAP), Naphthalene
MS (Murashige & Skoog, 1962) acetic acid (NAA)
basal medium and plant growth MS Nutrients Stock Solutions: Nutrient
regulator stocks. salts and vitamins are prepared as stock
Principle: solutions (20X or 200 X concentrations of
that required in the medium) as specified.
The basal medium is formulated
The stocks are stored at 4ºC. The desired
so that it provides all of the compounds
amount of concentrated stocks is mixed to
needed for plant growth and development,
prepare 1 liter of medium.
including certain compounds that can be
made by an intact plant, but not by an MS major salts mg/L 500 ml stock
isolated piece of plant tissue. The tissue medium (20X)
culture medium consists of 95% water,
1. NH4NO3 1650 16.5 gm
macro- and micronutrients, vitamins, mg
aminoacids, sugars. The nutrients in the
media are used by the plant cells as 2. KNO 1900 19 gm
3
building blocks for the synthesis of mg
organic molecules, or as catalysts in 3. Cacl .2H O
2 2
440 mg 4.4 gm
enzymatic reactions. The macronutrients
are required in millimolar (mM) 4. MgSO4.7H2O 370 mg 3.7 gm
quantities while micronutrients are needed 5. KH2PO4 170 mg 1.7 gm
in much lower (micromolar, μM)
Appendix I
Conversion factors :
me. mg/eq.wt
ppm mg/l or µg/ml
1 ppm 2.25 kg/ha
10,000 ppm 1 per cent
1 mg/100 g 22.5 kg/ha
1 kg/ha 0.1 g /sq m
1 hectare 2.471 acres
1 acre 0.405 hectare
1 kg /ha 1.12 lbs/ acres
Mesh number 16/ mm
Normality Specific gravity X Purity X 10
(Liquid) Equivalent weight
Normality Wt of salt per liter X Purity
(Solid) Equivalent weight
Grams per liter Normality X Eq. Wt.
Organic matter Organic carbon X 1.724
Optical density 2 – log T (T= transmission)
Per cent by Wt. Grams of solute
100 g of solution
1 Angstrom (Å) 10-8cm or 10-10 m
10 (Å) 1 nanometer or 1 millimicrometer
Temperature conversion :
o
C/5 (oF-32) / 9
P X 2.29 P2O5
P2O5 0.44 X P
K X 1.20 K2O
K2O X 0.83 K
SX3 SO4
N X 1.12 NH3
Protein (%) Nitrogen (%) X 6.25
Velocity of light 3 X 10-10 cm / sec.
Velocity of sound 332 m / sec.
Appendix II
Percentage composition of manures and fertilizers
Appendix III
Ready reckoner of fertilizer schedule at varying soil test values for different crops (kg ha-1)
Fertilizer Name Fertilizers Recommendations
Very Low Low Medium High Very High
PADDY (80:50:30)
Urea 260 215 175 130 85
Super Phosphate 470 390 310 235 155
Muriate of Potash 75 65 50 40 25
SOYBEAN (20:80:20)
Urea 65 55 45 35 20
Super Phosphate 750 625 500 375 250
Muriate of Potash 50 40 35 25 20
WHEAT IRRIGATED (100:50:30)
Urea 325 270 220 165 110
Super Phosphate 470 390 310 235 155
Muriate of Potash 75 65 50 40 25
WHEAT UNIRRIGATED (30:40:20)
Urea 80 65 30 15 -
Super Phosphate 375 310 250 125 60
Muriate of Potash 50 30 15 10 -
GRAM (30:60:30)
Urea 100 80 65 50 35
Super Phosphate 565 470 375 280 190
Muriate of Potash 75 65 50 40 25
MOONG / URID / LENTIL / ARHAR (20:50:20)
Urea 65 55 45 35 20
Super Phosphate 470 390 310 235 155
Muriate of Potash 50 40 35 25 25
PEA (35-75-30)
Urea 100 80 65 50 35
Super Phosphate 700 585 470 350 235
Muriate of Potash 75 65 50 40 25
MUSTARD (60-30-20)
Urea 195 165 130 100 65
Super Phosphate 280 235 190 140 95
Muriate of Potash 50 40 35 25 15
SUNFLOWER / SAFFLOWER (40:40:30)
Urea 130 110 90 65 45
Super Phosphate 375 315 250 190 125
Muriate of Potash 75 65 50 40 25
MAIZE (120:80:60)
Urea 390 325 260 195 130
Super Phosphate 750 625 500 375 250
Muriate of Potash 150 125 100 75 50
VEGETABLES (100:50:30)
Urea 325 270 220 165 110
Super Phosphate 470 390 310 235 155
Muriate of Potash 75 60 50 40 25
JWAR (50:35:25)
Urea 190 160 120 90 60
Super Phosphate 270 230 180 130 90
Muriate of Potash 40 30 30 20 15
Note: In wheat, paddy, mustard and maize the 50% of urea to be applied as basal doses. Rest 50% may be
applies in 2 to 3 split doses as top dressing.
Appendix IV
Appendix V
Rating of Nutrients:
Appendix VI
Performa for Soil Health Card
In-situ information
I. General Information :
Farmers Name
Age
Male/Female
Education
Address
Name of laboratory :
Date of Sampling :
Date of Sampling :
Recommendation :
Other details :