;mg

-
-. .- r .... .- - 0 - - •0

00, _0 y ---

0
-"-S----
-- r- .. -L ; - • -
1 - - -
-- 0

_
F----

1
-
- -
0 _____

.
•- __--- - - - - -..' ;--_ •00-

- r-r-- 1 - - - - -

0o - 0
0 0 - - 0--
- -p- - _ i -
---• 0
-

0---- -)- -0-

0_
- - ----
- -
--

---
JL
-

- --.--- '- - ---

- I 0-

•0 -
--
ik
- --
-
--

- ---- - - -

- -- -- - - -- i- --

0- - --
- - - --0-- 0-: --

0-- -

0--- --

------

- 0-- -

0- -0-- ------- --:.- -

-- - ----.---0-
0-

- - -.--- --0----- L:-.L i0-____ --

Jurisprudence
Fifth Edition

RWMDias

MA LL B (Cantab.)

of the Inner Temple, Barrister

Fellow of Magdalene College
University of Cambridge

(A BOOKS PRIVATE LIMITED

E LH I
Dias : Jurisprudence 5th Edition

First Indian Reprint 1994

© Butterworth & Co (Publishers) Ltd. 1985.

All rights resered. No part of this publication may be reproduced or

transmitted in any form or by any means including photocopying and
recording, without the writte's permission of the copyright holder,
application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such
v,ritten permission must also be obtained b ' f ore any part of ths
publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.

This edition is pubhed by arrangement with

Butterworth Law Publisrs Limited
Kent, U.K.

ISBN 81-85353-33-6

This publication is for sale in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Published by Kailash Balarsi for Aditya Books (F) Ltd.

Regd. Office 11-2/16, Ansari Road, Daryaganj,
New Delhi- 110 002 and Printed at Efficient Offset Printers, Delhi.
 I

Jurisprudence
 DEDICATED TO THE
AUTHORS OF
'THE MEANING OF MEANING' (1923)
Preface

The study of jurisprudence is an opportunity for lawyers to brin g theor

and life into focus, for it concerns human thought in relation to societ.. I:
is always the hope of teachers of law to encoura g e pupils to learn how to
think rather than just what to know, and Jurisprudence is suited to this end
because it can set law in wider contexts and proceed by way of stimulation
and not simply by instruction. This book does not evolve or demonstrate
a particular theory, but seeks instead to provide a way of thinking about
law. It tries also to furnish material for the evolution of ideas and the
understanding of other theories and in this respect serves as a prelude to
these contributions by providing an informed and critical background to
them. A guarantee of independence and originality in thought is breadth o
view, a sense of perspective and appreciation of what people have said and
are saying. No one theory provides the best or exclusive avenue to the
'truth', and those who choose to tread one path rather than another are
not for that reason misguided. Jurisprudence is a field traversed by man.
paths, none being superior to another, since much depends on whither on
wishes to go.
To give effect to this aim an attempt has been made to offer gudin
threads to the extensive literature on the topics dealt with, which will give
readers an idea of those topics and the issues and problems they involve
The reading lists appended to each chapter are no more than pointers. Side
by side with this, a parallel attempt has been made to provide fuller refer-
ences for those wishing to delve more deeply, which are contained in the
companion volume, A Bibliography of Jurisprudence, the object of which is
to enable readers to steep themselves in as many aspects as possible of
various topics by . consulting a wide range of views and shades
of opinion.
The only consistent theme throughout the various editions of this book
has been in the Prefaces announcing changes since the previous edition.
This stems from the fact that the book was born before being conceived.
which is why its gestation has been unusual, to say the least. The 'achieve-
ment of justice' as a general concern of law, which was the plan according
to which the last edition was revised, is continued. The book is divided
back into three Parts, and not two as before, and the material of the whole
book has been revised and redistributed. The first three chapters are differ-
ently presented and Chapter 3 is new. Other new material has been put in.
but there has also been a good deal of shortening and excision so as to
prevent the book growing larger; hopefully to make it shorter. The different
style and format of this edition make it difficult to gauge how far these
hopes have been realised.
The acknowledgment of the debts to others is always the pleasantest task.
The help given by those mentioned in previous Prefaces has been of per-
viii Preface

this edition, my gratitude to them can never diminish. Hoei'er, a special

word of thanks should continue to be given to that unfailingly helpful body
of critics, the undergraduates, whom I have met over the years in discus-
sions and classes. It is for their successors that this work is designed, and
if it proves to be of value to them, that might atone in some measure for
the experiments inflicted upon their predecessors.
In conclusion, I would like to record ray appreciation of the efficiency
and indulgence of the Publishers and Printers, who have made the business
of production as smooth as possible.

RWM DIAS
August 1985
Contents

PAGE
V
Preface
list of Cases xl

Part I Introduction
Chapter i - Introduction
Chapter 2 - Legal material 2

Chapter 3 - Rules, laws and legal system 47

Part II Aspects of justice 63

Chapter 4 - Distributive justice 6c
Chapter - The problem of power 7
Chapter 6 - Control of liberty
Chapter 7 Justice in deciding disputesped 4-' 126
Chapter 8 - Statutory interpretation
Chapter 9 - Custom 17
Chapter 10 - Values 194
Chapter 11 - Obligation and duty 2:6
Chapter 12 - Persons 20
Chapter 13 - Possession 22
Chapter 14 - Ownership 292
Chapter 15 - Justice in adapting to change 3:5

Part Ill Legal theory 329

Chapter 16 - Positivism: British theories 331
Chapter 17 - The pure theory 38
Chapter 18 - Historical and anthropological approaches 3-5
Chapter 19 - Economic approach 395
Chapter 20 - Sociological approaches 420
Chapter 21 - Modern realism 447
Chapter 22 - Natural law 470
507
Index
List of cases

FAG 1.
Apicasion de z Caz A '. Fall. V,:.-as
Ltd 1974
Abbe y Malvern Wells Ltd v Ministry of 72.
Applin '. Race Rela:.ns P,-arc :g'
Local Government and Planning
.202
('95') Arbon v Anderson 1943 2G
Ableyv Date (t85I ''7' Ar g ll (Duchess of v l)-.ke of Arrvil

(1967)
Adam v Ward (1917) .141
.194
Adams v Adams (A-G intervening)
Armory v Delarnirir 1722 .282
('97') 54,55 Armstrong v S:eain 1952
• I5
Adams v National Bank of Greece, SA Ashbv V Whine •1 734\ 3.1.
.2t7
(1961) Asher v Secretar, of State for the
Addie (R) & Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Environment 1074

Dumbreck (1920' -'49 Asher v Whitlock (t26 20'
.184
Adkins v Children's Hospital Askinex Ltd v Green 1960
Adler v George (1964) ..... .174
Aspdcn v Seddon (1274' .14.
Administration des Contributions mdi- Assam Railwa y s and Tradin g Co L:d v
rectes and Comit Interprofessionnel IRC (1935 ........
des \'ins Doux Naturels v Ramel Associated Ne'* spapers Gros: Ltd v
( 1 97 1 ' ........ Flynn (1970
Administration des Douanes v Soci6tê A-C v Antigna T,me Ltd l9
Cafes Jacques Nabre and J Weigel et A-C v Batrs. lrnposi:soris (.ae :6
CieSarf(t975' .105
A-C s Bs,tter'..or:h I 3 . S- a,_',
Adrniralt v SS Dtsina Os,ner 1 he .\pplica:i.
Truculent (1952 '0 A-Cs Cras ford LDC .
Admiralt y Comes S.S Amerska Osn- A-C Dc K-sees Rosal Hte( Ltd
ers) (19:7) • '49 920) ......
Affrteurs RéunisSA v Leopold \Valford A-C Farreil 1931.........
(London) Ltd (isto' ..... 92
A-Cs Ko'hlcr ,86t
Ainlev A,nlev (19451 ..... .148 A-C Prince Ernest Auu'tus 'fHsno-
.241
Aire y v Airev (1958 5CC (1(y........
Akar v A-G of Sierra Leone (1970) 93-95 A-C 1 horoton rIP24..
97 A-C for Xci' S..uth Wales v 3 rvth: an
Aksionairnove Ohschestvo A M Luther 032)
vJamesSagor&Co(1921) . . .219
AG of Commonalth of Astra!:a s
Alexander v Ra y s-on 0936' ....2ib
Adelaide SS Co Ltd :19131
AllenvFlood (1898' ......30 A-C oflIsng Kon g v Rediffusion (Hong
Allen vJackson (18731 ......162 Kong) Ltd .197r, • c.
Allen V Roughlev i 1955 ) .....294 A-C of New Zealand Lro..er Hutt
Alma SPA v High Authority 244/63 Corpis (1964' .......
(1965) .........,o6 A-C of Ness Zealands Ortiz t982
Amalgamated Society of Railway Serv- A-G of Sc Christopher. Nevis and An-
ants Osborne (1910) ......43 . 93. 13
guilla v Re nolds f 1980
Amministraziotse delle Finance drIb Auckland Bus Cciv Ne's Lynn Borough
Stato v SACE SPA; 2695/70 (1975) . -to,- 2.1.0
.1965)
Amministrazionc delle Finanze drib Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v
Stato v Simmenthal SPA (No 1 ) ioô/ Cren(t969 ' .....
77(1978) .........so6 Automatic %4tnarning C) Ltd V
-6 ) ...278.28,
Anconav Rogers (18 1 . Stringer ( 1957 .200
Anderson (\V B) & Sons Ltd Rhodes As. ilco ASs Fulvia Spa di Yavigazone.
(Lis erpool) Ltd (1967 11 .
....233 The Chikuma (19815 -
Anderson Ltd v Daniel (1924) - . . .176 Avero vJenkins (1873 . - • 20
Anglo- IranianOil Co Lid vJaftrate,Thc
Rose Mary (19531 ......2
Aisnetield,The(i97i) ......'49
Annsv Merton London BoroughCouncil
(1978.........39.204 B-a nilnor). Re (19815 ..... . 10.3
V . ,..'. (.. I ..' . Lw. 1.5..,-,,-0.., tsr' P. • C........-' r;. ,r P .'.'-

Bailey v Geddcs ( 1 938)
Bailey v Victorian Soccer Federation
(1976)
Bailey v Williamson (1873)
Baker, Re, Nichols v Baker (1890)
Baker vR(t975)
Baker v Turner (tgo) .....
Banco de Vizcaya v Don Alfonso de
Borbon y Austria (i) .
Banco, The, Monte Uha (Owners) v
Banco (Owners) (ir) .
Bank Voor Handel en Scheepvaart v
SlatIord (ig)
Bank of England v Vagliano Bros
........
Barclays Bank Ltd v JRC (rg6i)
Barker v Levinson ( ig, ) .
Barker v Wilson (1930) .....
Barnes vJarvis (tg)
Barratt v Gough . Thomas (tg)
Barrs v Bethel] (198)
Baxter v Baxter (19 4 8) .....
Baylts v Bishop of London (igi)
Beachey v Brown (t 86o)
.246
Beard v Beard (t946)
Beaulieu v Finglam ( to, ) .
Beck v Scholz (ig) .280
Becke v Smith (t836) . . .173
Beckett (Alfred F) Ltd v Lyores (tg6)
Beecham v Trinidad Cement Ltd
..........c... . ...
Behrens v Brtrm
Bertram .
Mills Circus Ltd
(1957)
Belfast Corpn v OD Cars Ltd (1960) .205
Belmont Finance Corpn Ltd v Williams
rurrlltureLto )1979) .... . 258
Bendall v McWhirter 0952) . . 162, 321
Benmax v Austin Motor Co Ltd ,g) 8,
Berendsen (S) Ltd v IRC (1958) . . .259
Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd
)1938) . . .246
. . . . . . . 207,245
Berkeley ' 'apadoyannjs (ig.ç) . . .280
Berliner Industrjcbank Akt v Jost
('97') ........ . 242
Berry v Irish Times ..... 3'
Best v Samuel Fox & Co Ltd (1952): 197,209
Betty's Cafes Ltd v Phillips Furnishing
Stores Ltd (,9 59 ) .......142
Bewlay (Tobacconists) Ltd v British Bata
Shoe Co Ltd (,g58) ..... . 184
Bilang v Rigg (1972) ..... .
Billings v Reed (' g ) ......178
Bilston Corpn v Wolverhamp t on Corpn
(1942) ........ . Bromilow and Edwards Ltd v IRC
Bird v Fort Francis (1949) .... . 283
Birmingham and Midland Omnibus Co
Ltd v W orcestershire CC (1967) . .
.205
Birmingham Corpn v West Midland
Baptist (Trust) Association Inc,
........ .
i66
Birtwistle v Tweedale ( t ) . . . .134
Bize v Dickason (1786) ..... . 242
BLack-Clawson International Ltd v Pa-
PACE
FAG E
.138 Bligh v Martin (1968) '2 85
Blundell v Catterall (182,) .... . 192
.262 Bolton (HL) (Engineering) Co Ltd v TJ
30 Graham & Sons Ltd . . 258, 269
.242 Bonham'$ Case (i6,o) ..... . 83,88
.143 Bonsor v Musicians' Union (1956) . -90,263
.280 Boomer v Penn (i965) . . . . 202,310
Borland's Trustee v Steel Bros & Co Ltd
.219 (tgoi) ........ . 255
Bourne vKeane (1919) ..... . 2t0
79 Bo'.. lesv Bank of England(tg,3) . .
. 93
Rom maker Ltd vTabor (t041) . . . . 27
.259 Bowman v Secular Society Ltd (1917) . 149,
210
.326 Boy Andrew (Owners) v St Rognvald
.259 (Owners) (1948) ...... . 178
.135 Boylan v Dublin Corpn ( tgg ) .
.141
.308 Boynton-Wood v Truernari( 1 9 6 1 )
. 279
175 Boys v Chaplin (1968) .....
. 130
t45 Bradbury v Enfield London Borough
.t43 (1967)
......... . 210
.st6 Bradford Corpn v Pickles (1895) . 26, 28, 30,
194
32, 232, 463
Bradford Old Bank v Sutcliffe (1918) . .
148 Bradlaugh v Gosset t (t88 4 ) . . . . 97
187 Bragg v Crosville Motor Services Ltd
'4'
Brassey's Settlement, Re, Barclays Bank
188, Ltd v Brass (1955) ..... . g8
189 Bratty v A-G for Northern Ireland
(1963) ...... . 202,310
Em Brentnall and Cleland Ltd v LC
t35
140 Bribery Comr v Ranasinghe (1965)
. 93, 94,
95, y7
Bridges v Hawkesworth (i8 5 1) . 282,288
Brighton Corpn v Packman (tgo8) . . 39
Britain v Rossiter (1879) . . . 240,243
British Coal Corpn v R (1935) . . .g8, 180
136 British Homophone Ltd v Kunz and
Crystallate Gramophone Record
Manufacturing Co Ltd
British Motor Trade Association v Sal-
vadori (tgg) ....... . 262
British Railways Board v GJ Holdings
British Railways Board v Herrington
(1972) . . . .
147, 149, i6, ig,
ig8, 204, 213, 266
British Railways Board v Pickin (1974): 88, 96,
167
Britt v Buckinghamshire Count y Council
55 (1963) ......... . 178
Broadbent vWilks(,7 4 2) .... . t88
97 (1970) ........ . 173
Bromley v Bromle y (196 5 ) .....j35
Bromley London Borough Council v
Greater London Council (1983) . . .223
Broom v Morgan (ig) . . 142, 155, 244
Broome vCa.ssell & Co Ltd ('97') . . .
Broome v DPP (tg74) ...... .
33
Broughv Nettleton (1921)278
Broughton v Snook ('938) .... . 240
B rnwn tLL.,,,..4 ...rrj...... -

PAGE
Brown v Rolls Royce Ltd (1960) . . .
Bryant v Foot (1868) . 188 , 189
Buccicuch (Duke) V IRC (1967) . . .135
Buchanan (James) & Co Ltd v Babco
Forwarding and Shipping (UK) Ltd
(1977)
Bulmer (H P) Ltd v J Bollinger SA
'(1974) .......'3', 179
Bunting v Oregon 243 US 426 tq i6) . . 184
BurdenvRigler(19l1) ......30
Burmah Oil Co (Burma Trading) Ltd
Lord Advocate (1965) . 100, 199
Burns v Bidder (1967) .309
Busch v Stevens ( 1 9 63) ......241
Bushford v Falco (1954) .....280
Butler v Board of Trade (1971) . .202
Butler (or Black) v Fife Coal Co Ltd
(1912) .........234
Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer (No 3)
.........219
(1982)
. Chung Chi Cheung v R ( 1 939) . . .218
Button v DPP, Swain V DPP (1966)
Byrne v Deane (1937) ......31
Byrne v Hoare (1965) ......283
Byrne v Kinematograph Renters Society
Ltd (1958) ........208
C Coburn v Colledge (1897
CHT Ltd v Ward )1963) .....135
Caisse Réginnale de 9,) 'trite Social do
Nord-Est v Goftari (1969) .131
Calder v Bull (1789.......103
Caldow v P,xell (1877) ......44
Caledonian RI) Co v North British Rly
0)(1881) .........172
Caller v Caller (1966) (1968) .260
Calvin's Case (,6o8..........2
Campbell v Paddington C.orpn (1911) . .
Campbell Discount Co Ltd v Bridge
(196 t); revsd. sub nom. Bridge
Campbell Discount Co Ltd (1962) .195
Canada EnterprisesCorpn Ltd v Macnab
Distilleries Ltd (,g8t) .....262
Candler v Crane Christmas & Co
(tgi) ......137, 148, 154
Cane (Valuation Officer) v Royal Cot-
kgeofhlusic)t961\ ......112
CannvWillson(1888) ......148
Canterbury (Viscountt v A-G 1842) .252
Carr vJamcs Broderick & Co 119421 . 27
Carrier's Case, The (1473) .....284
Carrington v Roots (1837) .....240
Cartwright v Post Office (t 969 ) .205
143,
Cassell & Co Ltd Brootne (I 972) . .
151,162,196,213
Cassidy vMinistry of Health 1 , 95') .204
Ca.stioni, Re (,89t\ .......168
Cattle '. Stockton Waterworks Co
08751 . . . . . . . 217,233
Casanagli V Ulster %Veasing Co Ltd
.......161,211
(1960)
Central London Property Trust Ltd v
High Trees Ho,ssc Ltd (,g) . . .321
GsaffersvGoldsmid (18 94 ) . . .
Chamberlifle v Flsrvev I t6g6t . . . .197
1' ',OE
Chapman v Honig (1963) . 25,28,36.217,
234
Chapman v Pickersgill (1752) . . . 40
Charter v Race Relations Board (1973 51,
7'. 120. 178
Cheney v Conn (Inspector of Tax-s)
(1968) ........3,80.218
Cheng v Governor of Pentonvill Priscn
)19731 ...........70 :75
Chic Fashions (West Wales Ltd Jones
(1968) ..........So 201
Chief Constable of North Wales Poltce v
Evans )ig8s
Chillingworth v Euche (1924) . . . .242
Ching Garage Ltd v Chtngford Cor?n
(1961) .........205
Chisholm v London Passenger Transport
Board (t939 1 ........138
Chokcs(ingo v A-G of Trinidad and
Tobago(1981) .......102
Church of Scientology, ex p (1978) .222
City of London v Wood (17$l) . . .
ClavtonvHcffron (1960'
Clayton v Woman & Son (Builders)
Ltd (1962)
Clore v Theatrical Properties Ltd and
%Vestby & Co Ltd (1935 ......30
Close v Steel Co of \Vales Ltd It 14€ 962 .
Cochrane, Re(iB4o) ......14€
Cohen. Re, National Provincial Bank
Ltd Katz (i953
Colchester Estates (Cardiff , CaI'.n
Industries plc 'i9843 .......27
. 30
Cole v Police Constable 4 33A (13
College of?hillt i a ns v Cooper (1675 - 93
Collins v Godefroy (1831 1 .....230
Collins v Minister of the lntrior
90
12_`- Si -
CoIl) more v A-G ( 1970 . . .
.25
Colonial Bank v Whinnev (1885) .
Commercial and Estates Co of Egs ?t V
Board of Trade)t.925- ......215
Compania Colornbiaita de Segurco v
.24)
Pacific Steam Navigation Co (19551
Compania Nasiera \'a.scorigado s S S
.......2,5
Crist,na(t9381
Company or Fraternity of Free Fisher-
men of Fasersharti, Re 1887 ) - . .253
Congrese v Home Office ' 1976) . 33 . 37 . 90.
110,210
. .25
Connors Bros Ltd v Connors (1940
Conservative and Unionist Central Of-
fice v Burrell (Inspector of Taxes)
(1982)
Pros ide st Society
Conset t Industrial.ind
Ltd s Cotiscit Iron Co 1922) . . .14--
Convey v Regan (t952) .....285
Conway v George \Vimpev & Co Ltd
() .........162
Conway v Rimmer (t968t . . 100, 127, 130,
203,213
Conway v Wade (1908) .....263.
Coop-rvP)sibbs(l857 ......aS
Copyright Owners Reproduction Sod-
et, v E).11 (Australia Pty Ltd

Lu V flC1t
(198 1) . 17
Corbett v Burge, Warren and Ridgicy
Ltd (1932) ........233
Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley)
('97')..........'57
Corbett v Corbctt (otherwise Ashley)
(No 2) () .......312
Corfu Channel Case, The (19 4 8) - .
Gsrocraft Ltd v Pan American Airways
Inc (j969) .....173,179,218
Costa v Ente Nazionak per lErie'rgia
Elettrica (ENEL):6/64 (1964) - io, io6,
107
Council of Civil Service Unions v Min-
ister for the Civil Service (196) - .200
Coutts & Co v Browne-Le'cky (,g) • 32
Cove v Flick ( i ) ...... .8o
Crabb v Arun District Council (197€) .321
Craddock v Hampshire County Council
(1958)
.142
Craxfords (Psmsgate) Ltd v Willirr,s
and Stccr :"anucactur-ing Co Ltd
(tg.) .240
Crinton v Minister forJustice (1959) .283
Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co
Ltd v Veitch (1942)
3'
Crouch v Credit Foncier of England
(1873)
193
Crowe (Valuation Officer) v Lloyds
British Testing Co (tg6o) .180
Crowhurst v Maidment .280
Crown Lands Comrs v Page (tg6o) .237
Croxford v Universal Insurance Co Ltd
1'52") .......171, 172
Cullimore v Lyme Regis Corpn 11962 . 37
Cunningham, Re, ex p Bennett (1967) .
Curtis Moffat Ltd v Wheeler (1929) .145
Curwen v Milburn (1889) .....241
Customs and Excie Comes v Top Ten
Promotions Ltd (1959) .....185
Cutler v McPhail (1962) .....24.4
Cutler v Wandsworth Stadium Ltd
D
D v National Society for the Prevention
of Cruelty to Children (1978) . 146,203
D (a minor) Re, (1976) ......203
DHN Food Distributors Ltd v London
Borough of Tower Hamlets (1976) . 262,
255, 266
Da Costa en Schake NV v Nederiaridse
Administratie van Belastingen: 28-
30/62 (1963) .........131
Daimler Co Ltd V Continental Tyre and
Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd
(1916,1 .........258
Daly v Liverpool Corpn (tgg) . . .247
Dando (S L) Ltd v Hitchcock (194) • .280
Davey v Harrow Gorpn (1958) . • .14*
David v Abdul Cader (1963) . • 28,34,37
Davie v New Merton Board Mills Ltd
( 1 959 i .....138,148,159,212 EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank
Davis v Elsby Bros Ltd (1960) . . .
Davie (or Davis) v Powell (1738) . • .147
Davies Jenkins & Co Ltd v Davies
(inspeclorofTaxes) (t968) . . 168, 172
Davis vJohnson (tgg) ......178
Davis (Clifford) Management Ltd v
WEA Records Ltd (i) . . . .211
De Frcitas v Benny (1976) .....92
Defrenne v SA Beige de Navigation
A&ienne: (1976) .....105
De Funis v Odcgaard 4° L Ed (sd) 164
66
Delaney vT P Smith Ltd (*946) . . . 29
Dc Morgan v Metropolitan Board of
Works (188o) ........30
Denby (William) & Sons Ltd v Minister
of Health (1936) .......2,09
Deportation of Aliens, Re . . .
Derry v Peek (1859) . . . . i6,, 233
Dcwhirst, Re, Flower v Deshirst
(1948)
DcWutzv Hendricks (,824) . .
. .2,8
Deyong v Shenburn (1946) . . . .234
Dickinson v Del Solar (1930) . 40,219, 243
Dimes v GrandJunction Canal (Proprie-
tary) (1852) ..... 208,259
DPP Bhagwan(ig72) .....30
DPP v Brooks (,g,) ......289
DPP v Kent and Sussex Contractors Ltd
258
Diw ell vFarnes(1959) ......2,6
Dixon v Tommis (1952) .....280
Docket's' Labour Club and institute Ltd
v Race Relations Board ( i ) . . . 184
Dodwell & Co Ltd's Trust Deed, Re
253
Dodworth v Dale (1936) .....t95
Doe d Harding v Cooke (t831) . .293
Doe d Hughes vDyeball(,8 20 ) . .293
Doe d Burrough v Reade (1807) . .293
Donoghue (or McAlister) v Stevenson.
See M'A)ister (or Donoghue) v Ste 'en-
son
Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office
(1969) .........204
Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co
Ltd (1964) .......128, 161
Dowty Boultor, Paul Ltd v Wolverhamp-
ton Corpn (1971) .......40
Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd
( 1 937) .........t45
Duck vMayeu(,892) ......244
Dulkwe v Duliewe (1969) . . . 176, iSo
Duncan v Cammell Laird & Co Ltd
(1942) .........203
Duncan vJones (1936) ......30
Dupor, Steels Ltd v Sirs (1980) . 214, 221,
315
DurfeevJones ....... .288
Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC (1972) . 37,
145, i6,, 204
Dwyer v Mansfield (*946) .....207
Dyson Holdings Ltd v Fox (1976) . . 28o
.257
Ealing London Borough v Race Rela-
tions Board (,ois( . ,R, ,-,st ,is,-, ,Q.


P\,)E

Fast Ham Borough Councd (or Cnrpni Fagan s Nietropoluar. Poitce Go rnr -
v Bernard Sunles & Sons Ltd 1965' ( 191)9
.39 ...
Goi Suffolk Rivers Catchment Board Fatrman v Perpetual In'. mtme:.t Bo:.d-
Kent 9415 .... ingSocietv '1923.
27- 37-204
Eastbourne Corpn Fortes lc Cream Falmou'h Boat Construo-on C,, Lt: v
Parlour 19551 Ltd 1959) . . . Hosn4 . 19'o''; affd. soo nom.
.50
F,asterii Counties Building S.s'iet'. v Falmouth Boat Cx,'o.strucor>n Dd
Russ')) 47 1951 . . . . . . iya
E,tso'rts D i -trihsitor' Ltd v C,old:srs, Farrell'. Alexander ',c,- . tao.
........241 Federal Steam Nas,ga:::r, (a. Lt:
Eastham u Newsmd" United F oothall l)epa:tmen' of Trade and 1d'..--r
Club Ltd 104'.......197
I
'i974 ........t7
Eastman Photographic Materials Co Ltd Fe,rs for Examination of' im red Or-
v Comptroller-General of Patents anges.Re(t975) ......to".
1898 .........'75 Felixstowe Dock and RI'. Co ar,d E .ro-
Ebb, Vale UDC v South Wale , Traffic pean Ferries Ltd v Brit:.sh Decks Board
Area Licensing A:ithority i . r.r British t97" ....., IO' IO

Transport Commission) (195t Felt v Burrhet 1857' ......t8

.254
Edgington v Sw indon Corpn (19391 Fellner v Minister of the Interior
.205
Edginton v Clark (19641 .....a8 (i --.14'
Edinb(srgh and Dalkeith RI' Co v Fender v StJohts-Miidma.' (1933) . 217.220
Wa1schope(1842 ......g6 Fendoch Investment Trust Co v IRC
Edwardss A-G for Canada (1930) . . 119455
. 180
Edwards vJoiies ('947) .....135 Ferguson v Earl ofKinr,oll ( 12 4 2 ) . . 37
Edwards v Porter (19251 .....173 Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjrus v Fairbairn
Egerton v Earl Brownlow (1853' 207,26 LaasonombeBarlx.or Ltd 1943' . .141.
Egertott v Harding (1975) .....i88 Firma Alfons Lut,icke GrnbH v
Egger s Viscount Chelmsford (or Da, i,s tzollamt Sarrelouis: 57 'h (1971
(196 ..........41 Firman Ellis 19781
Eleciris'al. Llestrontc 1'elecomrnunica- Fisher v Bell 196 ( ....... 1. .
tints and Plumbing Union s Times Fisher s Ruislip-North'- :-d L DC and
Newspapers ltd t 9801 . Sliddi-sex (osinty Cr oocil 'J4
. 263 21

F71 ' 'ctrical lrotallatsoos.it Exeter Hospit'i Fisher Tas lors F urn:s,):ng S,'sre, Ltd -
Agreement. Re (t971) ......18 (1956
o
Elias Pasmore )i934 1 .... Fitzsim ns v Ford Motor Co Ltd i A e r o
145,201
Ellen Street Estates Lid s Minister of Engines) (1946) .12
Health (1934) .......89 Fletcher v, Budgen (ia .....
17"
Dittman Lines Ltd Murra y . 1931 Fletcher's Application. R . 970
.179 . 37
Elliot s Lordjotces ' i935 ......a6o Foakesv Beer 11884) . . .141.
Ellis vjohnstoite (1963) .....153 Forbes vCochrane(1824 ..... 1 97
F,!wes Brigg Gas Co (t886) .
282,287 Foster a Dr i scoll (1929 . . . . at
Empson v Smith 11966) ......243 Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd
Enderbv ]'own Football Club Ltd v (1981) .......177, 179
Football Association Ltd (1971) . Fowley Marine (Emswr:h" Ltd v Gaf-
. . 208
Engineering Iudus,r, Training Board v ford 11968 ........aBa
Samuel Talbot (Engineers) Ltd Fox, Re, Brooks v Marston (191 3( . . . 300'
(1969' ..........75 Fox v Newcastle-upon-Tyne Corpo
English Hop Growers s Ocring (1928) (i.').211
F.ntirk '. Carrington )I7b1 Frances (Ketch) (Owners' v Highland
. 82, 145, 198,
Loch (Owners), The Highland Loch
201
Erringion v Minister of Health (1935) . tt912)
.208 ..........9.8
Escoigne Properties Ltd v I RC 1958) . Francis a Chiefof Pultce 973 ' ,
176, . 2 110
Francis v \iewsley and Wet Dras ion
i8i, iB
Esse,tdon Engineering Co Lid v Made UDC(1958' ........150
(1982 . .........258 Francorne v Mirror Group Newspapers
Estler s' Murrells 1,959 1 .....188 Ltd )1984 -317
Ewart s Ewart 1959' .......173 Franklin vA-G(1974' ......252
Eyre vjoht,son (19461 ......247 Franklin v Minister of Town and Coun-
Eton v Studd (15741 ......175 try Planning (1948' ........6,208
Franklin v R (No 2) (1974 5 .......-
Frauds on Agricultural Lcvies, Re: 8a,'
72(1974 5 .........104
Free Church of Scotland (General As-
FA and AB Ltd s Luploti (Inspector of sembly) v Lord Overteaun (1904' . 263
Taxes (1972'. . . . 136, 146, 152,154 French Kier Developments Ltd v Secre-
FG (Films) Ltd. Re 1933) .....255 tary of State for the Environment


G (infants), Re (t963)
GKN Bolts and Nuts Ltd Sports and
.252 (1983) ........
Hale vJennings Bros (t938) . . .
.
178
. 137
Social Club, Re, Leek v Dnkcrsky Haley v London Electricit y Board
(1982 ) .........265
Gallagher v Post Office (io) - . .21
(t'965) .....
Hall v Rogers (1925) .....
t6,
.
164
279
Gallic v Lee (1969); on appeal sub nom.
Saunders (Executrix oI\Vill ofGallie)
Anglia Building Society (1971) . .132
}Iallett's Estate, Re, Knatchbull v HaIku
(t88o) ........
Hambleton v Callinan (1968) . . 278, 284
.
162

Gardiner v Heading (1928) . .194

Gardiner v Moore (1969) ....
Garfinkel v Metropolitan Police Comr
244. Hamilton v National Coal Board
(1960)
Hamps v Darby ( 1 94 8 ) ......135
(1972) . . . . . . 199,201,202
Gatehousev Vise (1956) ....
Geelong Harbor Trust Comrs v Gibbs
.
217
Hampstcad Corpn v Caunt (1903) . . . 35
Hanna, Re ( 1 957) ......
Hannah vPcel(t 945 ( ......282
. 29

Bright &Co(i97 4 ) . .t31,155,t83,214

Gejsrnar v Sun Alliance and London
Insurance Ltd (1978) .... .
68
Hanover (HRH Prince Ernest Augustus)
vA-G(t955) .....
Harding v Price (t 948) .....
. . _3 174
169
George and Richard, The ( 18 7 1 ) . .260 Hargreaves v Bretherton (t959) . 233
George Wimpey & Co Ltd v BOAC
(tg) ........ .
t43
Harper v National Coal Board (,g) - 140,
'43

.. .
GlianivJones(,97o) 99,201,202 Harper v Secretary of State for the Horne
Gibbons v Pepper (1695) .... 309 Department (1955) .... 96,97
Gilbert v Stone (1647) ..... 309 Harris v Minister ofthe Interior (t 952 95,
Giles v Walker (1890) . . .
Gilford Motor Co v Home ( z 933) . . 257
Godden v Hales (1686) .....
. 41,209

.
133
Harris v Quine (t869) .....
Hartley v Mayoh & Co (t) 176,234
.
9.99
240
Gofor Investments Ltd v Roberts -
('s) .........280
Golak Nath v State of Punjab (1967) .
Haseldjne v C A Daw & Son Ltd
(1941) ........
Haynes v Harwood 0935) 13- . . . 239 -
. 141
Goldman v Hargrave (t967)
Goodier vCooke (ioo)
Goodrich vPaisner(t 957 )
.....
. . . .172
279
. 176, 184
Hayward v Chaloner (1968) . .
Hazell v British Transport Commission
(1958) .........
.

.
285

161
Gordon sHarper (t796)
Gorris v Scott (1874)
..
Goodwin vRobarts(t8 75 ) .....193
....
.....
281
t76
Heap v Ind, Coopc and AIlsop Ltd
(1940) .......55 94
Heathfield v Chilton (t 767) . .

. .2
Gouriet v Union of Post Ot8ce Workers
Heatons Transport (St Helens) Ltd
(1978) . . 26, 118, ''9, 120,223.317
Transport and General Workers'
(1958) ........ .
Grafstein v Holme and Freeman
283
Union (1973) ........263
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller &
Stanley (zgo8) .
Gramophone and T y pewriter Ltd
...... 259
Partners Ltd (196 4 ) . 142, 148, 16 1, 204,

erties Ltd (t) ...... .

Grants Southwestern and County Prop-.

Great Northern Rly v Sunburst Oil and

3
Henderson v Folkestone Waterworks Co
(1885) .......148, 150
2'5!233,354

Henshall (John) (Quarries) Ltd

Refining Co 287 US 358 (1932) . . .io
Harvey (1965) .......258

Green sHills (1969)

.
Great Western Rly Co v Mostyn (Own-
ers), The Mostyn (1928) ....
. . . . 202, 3t0
'4'
Heron II, The, C Czarn)i:ow Ltd v
Koufos(t966) .......147
HerringvTemplensar,(,g, 3 ) . .
2) (18) ........ .
Green & Sons v Minister of Health (No

Gresham Life Assurance Society v

205
Herschtal (or Herschthal) v Stewart and
Ardern Ltd 094 0 ) ......'45
. .208

Heydonv Smith (t6io)

.
Crowcher(1 9 1 5 ) .......300
Grey Pearson (1857) ...... 173 Heydon's Case (1584) ......175
Heyman v Darwins Ltd (1942)
281,284

(t965) .........too
Grosvenor Hotel, London (No 2), Re

Grundig Werke GmbH andJNJ Sieverd-

ing NV v PVBA Common Markt
Import and Trade Co(t968) . . .105
Guinns (Arthur), Son & Co (Dublin)
Ltd s- The Frcshfield (Owners), The
Lady Gwendolen (1965) ....
Hibbrt v McKiernan (t948)
Higgs v Nassauvian Ltd (t975)
.139
.284
.285
Hilder v Dexter (1902) .......- .178
Hill v Aldershot Corpn (1933) - .195
Hill v Baxter (1958) . . 202,309,3,0
.258
Hill v C A Parsons & Co Ltd (1972)
Hill v East and West India Dock Co
(t884)9 App Cas448
- .296

Hinds vR(,977) ........102

H Hivac Ltd v Park Royal Scientific
Instruments Ltd (1946) .....211
Hack London Provident Building
Sockxy(1883) ...... . '44
Hodgson v National and Local Govern-
ment Officers Association (1972) . .263
 PAGE
Hogan v Benrinck West Hartley Colli-
cries (19*8; ........I28
Hoggett v Hoggett ( 1979) .....a8o
Holmden's Settlement Trusts, Re, Holm-
den vlRC(1966.......142
Holmes v DPP (1946(
Holt v Dawson (1940) ......279
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd
(,o) .....i9, 1 5 1 , 135, 162
Horwood v Millar's Timber and Trading
C0LId(1917) .......'97
Houldssorth v City of Glasgow Bank
and Liquidators (1880) .....254
Hounslow London Borough Council v
Twickenham Garden Developments
Ltd (1971) ........38
House Property and Investment Co Ltd,
Re (1954) .........1 34
Howard and Wife v Walker and Lake
(Trustees) and Crisp (1947) . . . .139
Howard de Walden (Lord) v IRC
(1942) .......177,206
Howard's Will Trusts, Re, Levin v
Bradley(g6i) .......2,6
Howell v Falmouth Boat Construction
Ltd. See Falmouth Boat Construction
Co Ltd v Howell
HowgatevBagnall '95!) .....178
Huddersfield Police Author i ty v Watson
........127
Hughes v Griffin (1969 ( .....285
Hughes v Her.dersor. 1 963 . . . 38
Humphries v Connor (1864) . . . 30
Hurst v Picture Theatres Ltd (1915) . 36,39
Hutton v Warren (1336) .....192
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v
Shatwell (1963) . 32, 114, 155,211,212,
244
Import Dutieson Processed Beef(1966) .to6
Import of Pork, Re: 20-2t/63 (1966) - .105
Industrial Properties (Barton Hill) Ltd v
Associated Electrical Industries Ltd
128,294
IRC v Ayrshire Employers Mutual In-
surance Association Ltd (19461 - .172
IRC v Bew Estates Ltd (1956) 265
IRC v Colico Dealings Ltd (19)
IRC v ColIco Dealings Ltd (1962)
''79
IRCvCrossman(1937) - .255
IRC '. Dowdall O'M.shoney & Co Ltd
(1952) 172
IRC v Educational Grants Association
Ltd (19o7) .........175
IRC v Harton Coal Co Ltd (t 960) - - .259
IRCvHinchy(ig6o) . . . . 171.172
IRCv Rossminster Lad (1980) - . . .199
Internationale Handelsgesellnchaft mbII
v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle ftjr
Getreide und Futtermittel: 52/71
(1974) .........105
Ionian Bank Ltd Cc-uvreur (, q6 . .2o6
PAGE
Jackson V Hall ('8o)
Jackson (Francis) Developments Ltd
Hall (193
Jacobs vLCC(195o) - - u:, 1 -L2
James (an insolvent) (A-C intervening.,
Re ( 1 977 ) ...........
James v Thomas H Kent & Cr, Lt
(igt) .........215
Jarvis v Williams (1953
Jebb, Re, Ward-Smith Jebb 196-r . .
Jeffrey v Black (1978) ......-3 2c:
Jennings v Quinn and Dooris (1966
(.1968)
Jewish Maternity Home Trustees v Gar-
finkle(1926) ........270
Jilani v Government of Punjab (ig;a .lc.
12, 54, 55, 82, 87, 93, 100, I, 2c
239, 332, 3 6 5, 3 66 , 3 6 7, 37 I, 373
Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corps (lost; - 35
Johanna Oldendorff, The. See O:den-
dorif (E Li & Co GmbH v Tradax
Export SA, Thejohanna Oldendor8
John v Rees(197o) .......2C3
Johnson vAgnew(1973
Johnson Clark ( 1908 .......t6
Johnson v New Jersey 384 US ;t
(t966).............
Johnson v Phillips (1975 ... 255,3
Johnson's Will Trust4., Re, Naziors
Provincia! Ba.k Ltd vJeftre ) )t .2
Jones Chapman ;l849
Jones v Dennison (i97,
Jones vGeen(1925.......207
Jones v Lipman (1962 259,252
Jones v Randall ;'1774.......2t6
Jones v Secretar y of State for Social
Services (1972 - 143, 146, 119 t50. 16;.
77. Ll,2t3
Jones vSelby (1710) ......273
Julius vLord Bishop of Oxford (i83o . -
Junior Books Ltd v \'eitchi Co Ltd
(1983) ......137,t39.204
K
Kariapper v Wijesinha (t 968) - . . . 103
Katikiro of Buganda v A-G (196o( .173
Kaufman v Gerson (1904( .....195
Kavanagh v Hiscock (,g;. . . . . 33
Kaye v Sutherland (1887)
Kennaway v Thompson (198 1) .207
Kennedy vSpratt(i97a; .....17)
Kerrison v Smith (1897) .....33
Keys v Boulter (i,) - . . - 170,263
Ktnally,ex p (1958) ......37
King's Prerogative in S.altpetrc (,6o6) .20
Kirkness v John Hudson & Co Lid
( 1 955) .........iSo
Kitchen v RAF Association (1958; -194
Knapp v Railway Executive (19491 - 176.
234
Knight v Sampson (1938) .....133
Knight and Searle v Dose (1964) - .265
Knieht's Question, Re 7toco t .......-,

Koenigsberg, Re, Public ':tre v Ko-
enigsberg (ig) .148
Korcmatsu v US 323 US 214 • 200
Kores Manufacturing Co Ltd v Kolok
Manufacturing Co Ltd (1959)
.207
Krause v IRC(,g29) 89,99
Kurnigl v Donnersmarck 095) .259
Lady Gwendolen, The. See Guinnes
(Arthur), Son & Co (Dublin) Ltd
The Freshheld (Owners), Tbe Lad'
Gwendolen
Lake District Special Planning Board
Secretary ofState for the Environmen
Laker Airways Ltd v Department of
Trade (1977) .....
Land Comr v Pillai (tg6o) ..... . 25!
Langhirk Properties Ltd v Surre'
County Council (1969)
Langford Property Co Ltd v Battet
(1951)
Langford Property Co Ltd v Turema t
('949)
Langham v City of London Corp t
(1949)
I.atilla v IRC ( x
) .
Latimer v AEC Ltd (t953)
Lawrence v Hitch (1868)
_.._.,__..__
Laythoarp v Brn_yant (1836)
Leader v Duffey (1888) ....
Leather Cloth Co v Lc,rsont (t 86c,
Leathlcy v John Fcrssler & Co Lt
(1946)
Lee Bude and TorringtonJuncti:,n Rh
o(t87t) .......
Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd (t96 t)
Leigh vJack (1879) ......
Leigh & Sillasan Ltd v Aliakman Ship
ping Ltd (1985)
Lenriard's Carr y ing Co Ltd v Asiati
D 7._I
ICLLOICUIII LA)"" (t9153 S._. -S
Leroux v Brossn (1852) ....
Letang v Cooper (1965) . . 177,178,233
Levene v IRC (1928)
Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Clcanin
Co Ltd (1978) .210
Lewis, exp(t888)
Lexmead (Basingstoke) Ltd v Lewit
(1982)
Lillingston, Re, Pembery v Pember)
(t952)
Em Chin Aik v R (1963) . .246
Linipus v London General Omnibus Cc
Ltd (1862)
Litter v Romford Ice and Cold Storage
Co Ltd (1957)
Littledale v Liverpool College (1900) .285
aucwocn_Is iaii 'Jraer otores LtQ V
IRC(t96g) . . . . . . 256,259
Liversidge v Anderson (1942) . 7, 172, 182,
Liyanage v R (1967) . . . . 100,102
Local C 'rrnrnent Board v Arlidge
FnuE
Lochner v New York 178 US 45(1904) .387
Lochner v US, 18 US 45 (io) . .194
Locksscssd, Re, Atherton v Brooke
(1958) .........173
Lockyer v Gibb (1967) ..... . 284
London and Country Commercial Prop-
erty Investments v A-G (,g) .175
London and County Securities Ltd v
Nicholson (1960) .......206
London Brick Co Ltd v Robinson
(1943) .........73
London Corpn v Appleyard (1963) .82
LCCV Lees (t939) .......185
London Gracing Dock Co Ltd v Horton
(1951) .........t44
London Jewellers Ltd v Attenborough
142
208 London Passenger Transport Board v
Upson (t949) ........138
. ito, t i8 London Tramways Cov LCC(t8q8) . .127
London Transport Executive v Betts
( 1 95) .........,, ,, t8
.28,233 Longdon..Grifflths v Smith (1c151) . .263
Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd
• .185 (1980) .........262
Lorentzen v Lydden & Co Ltd (1942) . .219
280 Iotanv Cross (t8to) ......28!
Lotus,The(,927) .......127
70 Low v Fry (, 9 35) ...... . 242
• .177 Lucy v \V T Henleys Tekgraph Works
6g, 212 Co Ltd (i97o).......178
.189 Luke vlRC(t963) .......
.240 Lyons (Raymond) & Co Ltd v Metro-
.172 politan Police Comr ( t ) . . .295
Lyons. Sons & Co v Gulli'. Cr 14) .207
'35
Lyus v Stcpnev Botoj g h Ccuricil
ISO ( 1 94 1 ) ........ . is8
88,96
.254
SI
.285
M (Infant), Re (196 1) ......252
.204 MAlister (or Donoghue) v Stevenson
(1932) . . . 138, 142, 144, 146, 154,
.257 16l,204,301
. 240 .Iacarthysv Smith (tgg) ... 107, 179
Macarthys Ltd v Smith (t 961) . . 105, 107
Macaura v Northern Assurance Co
(1925) . . . . . . . 2 55, 259
McasskyvR(1920) ......96
30 MacCorn,ick v Lotd Advocate (1953) . . 98
McDuff Co Ltd vJohannesburg Consol-
t6t idated Investment Co Ltd (1924) . .259
McFarlane v Sharp (1972) . . 199. 201, 202
.278 McGrath (J) Motors (Canberra) Pty v
Applebee (1964) .......7
MclnernyvLloyds Bank Ltd ( 1 974) . . t68
.162 McKay v Essex Area Health Authority
(1982) .........ig8
38,212 Mackenzie-Kennedy v Air Council
(1927) .........557
M'Leod (Neil) & Sons Ltd, Petitioners,
Re (1967) .........26,
Macmanaway, Re, Re House of Com-
'99 mons (Clergy Dis qualification) Act
( 1801 )( 1 9 1 ) .......iSo
McMillan v Crouch (1972) - . 175,178


PAGE ?AGE

Maddison v Alderson (1883) . . . .240 Minister of the Interior V Harris (l9) .

Madras Electric Supply Corpn Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Go'. v
Boarland(ig55) ..........2 Sharp 1970)
Nladzimbamuto v Lardner-Bnirke (No Mir Hassan v The Sosre, Pak LD
2)(1968) .........55 (1969 ............36
Madzimbarnuto v Larduer-Burke and Mirehouse v Rennell 1233 .127.200
George (1969) ......98,350 Mitchell v Harris Eng,r.ering Co td
Nladzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke NO (1967
(1968 . . . .54.100,363,366,367 Nloftatt '. Kazana 1969
Magdalena Steam Navigation Co v Mogul SS Co s SlcGrez.r Goi. & Co
Martin (1859) . . . . . 219,243 (1889 ;affd.(1892 ......... 235
Magna Plant v Mitchell (1966' . Molkerei-Zentrale V estfalen-Linpe
Magor and St Mellons RDC v Newport GmbH v Haup'zollanA Paderbin:
Corpn (tgo . . . . 172, 176, 178, 181 16/6 (1969......los. io')
Maharaj v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago Molkerei-Zentrale \Vestfalen-Lipe
(Nos) ( 1 979' GmbH v Hauptzsllanst Paderlxrn:
.......92
Malaysia (Gos ernment) v Selangor Pilot 28:67(1968' ......102.13:
Association (i) ....205,296 Moore v A-G for Irish Free cate
Malone v Metropolitan Police Comr ( 1 935' .........94
(1980) .........202 Moore v Hewitt ...... 130
Moore v I Bresler Ltd (i44) .252
Manuel v A-G (1983" 98,350
Marshall v BBC ( I 979) ......175 Moore v Robinson '183t
Morelle Ltd v Wakeling 955 .130
Matthes V Bobbins (1980) .....212
Mathews v Kuwait Bechtel Corpn Morgan v Fear (ID7( ......'49
( i gy) . . . . . . . 1 45, 196 Morgan v Liverpool Corpn (1927) .207
Matthews v MacLaren and Jones, The Nforphett vJones (IBIS........
Ogopogo (1969 .......310 Morris Baron &Co (1918) . . .243
Maunsell v Olins (,g) . 16, 173, 173, 185 Morrison v Sheld Corpn (ii . . 122
Medway v Doublelock Ltd (1978) . . .206 Morrisons (or Morrison Holdinos L:d v
Medway Drydock and Engineering Co IRC(i966 ............
Ltd v motor vessel Andrea Ursula, Niortensen v Peters ç';'3 .....2 I
The Andrea Ursula 1973" 79 NIc'ses . h,'-ferlan
Niembery v Great Western Rly Co 1:xxS lor, t I 32: . . . .
(1889...........42 Niungoni v A-G of Nor:hern Rhesia
Mercer v Denne (1904" .....188 (1960)
Merchandise Transport Ltd v British MurlandvDespardlg56 . . . 283
Transport Commission (1962) . .26o Nlusgrose< v Chun Teeor.z To7 (tEc.:: . 20
Merkur Island Shipping Corpn v Laugh- MusservUtah ........113
ton (t983.........185 Mustapha, Re, Nlustana '. Wo5ake
Metropolitan Asylum District Managers (1891) ....... .276
vHili(i881) ........205 NlusurusBe)sGadhan 1894) .243
Meux v Great Eastern Rl) Co (1893) .281 MutasavAGlI980.......230
Volpe (1967) ....279,280 Mutual Life and Citizens Assurance Co
Michel v
Middlesex SheriWs Case (I840) . . .246 vEvatt(1969( . . . . 162,333,498
Middleton v Baldock (igo) . . . .280 Mutual Life and Citizens Assurance Co
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Heu, Ltd v Evart (1971) .....7,167
Stubbs and Kemp (a firm) (1979): 129,247 Nlwenya, Re (1960) ......350
Midland Counties Motor Finance Co M y ers v DPP (196) ......163
Ltd v Slade (1931) ......242
Miles Forest Rock Granite Co (Leices-
tershire) Ltd (1Q18' .137
N
Nliliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd
(1976) . . . 127, 128, 132, 147, 148, Nagle v Feilden (1966 .....suB, 209
151, 21 3 .21 9 , 334 IN Molvan (O.ner of Motor \ essel
Millar vTay!or 07691 . 178, 194 Asya) v A-G for Palestine (1948 . .2
Miller Collins (i8961 ......300 Nakkuda Al) v NI F De S Javaratne
Miller vJackson (1977) .....207 () ........ . 182
Miller ' Oregon 208 US 412 (1907) . .184 Nan der Linde vCalitz '1967) . . .100
Miller SS Co Ptv' Ltd v Overseas Tank. Nash v Tarnplin & Sons Brewer y . Br,gh-
ship (UKi Ltd R %V Miller & Co Pty ton, Ltd (1932 .......'4'
Lid v Oserseas Tankship (UK) Ltd National and Grindlavs Bank Ltd v
The Wagon Mound (No 2); 015 appeal Kentiles Ltd and Official Receiser
sub norn. Overseas Tankship (UK) (1966) .........253
Ltd v filter SSCoPty (1967) . . 2,138, National Bank olGreecc and Athens SA
142, 146, i6i v Metissa (19581
Mills v Colchester Corpn (1867) . -28, 18 National Bank of Greece S.\ v West'
F nd Tr,s1,e


.aL,orial Loa 12.u.ard UaIIcy (t 98) . .212 Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd s' Slorm
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Air,- Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, The
t..orth (1965) .....162. 321 \Vagn Mound (1 951) . . 23, 128 7 138,
National Union of General and Munici- 147, 161
pal Workers v Gillian (19 4 6) . .262
NdTsana v Hofmeyr NO (tm) . 97,98
Neumann (Firtna Max) v Hauptzollamt
Hof/Saalc: 98/63 (1969) . . . ,o6 P
New South Wales Taxation Comrs v Paisncr v Goodrich ( 1 55) .....280
Palmer (1907) .......142 Paley (Princess Olga) v \Veirz (1929) .
New Windsor Corpn v Mellor (1974): 188, i Pancomtnerce SA v Veecheema BV
New York Times v United States . . . 103 (1983) .........247
Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcas- Paradise Beach and Transportation Co
tle Hospital (t959) . . . . 272,282 Ltd v Price-Robinson (1968) . . .285
Nc's man (George) & Co, Re (189) .257 Paris v Stepney Borough Council
N)blett v Confectioners' Materials Co 211
(1921) .........34 Parkanski, Re (1966) ......13
Nicholas v Penny (tgo) .....'3° Parker v British Airways Board (1982) .283
Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Colli- Parker and Cooper Ltd v Reading
eries Ltd(tg 4 o) . . . . 173, 198,295 (1926) .........257
Nordenfelt v Slasim Nordenfelt Guns Parkinson v College of Ambulance Ltd
and Ammunition Co ( 1894) . 259 and llatrtson (1925) ......216
Norris .. Edmonton Corpn (1957) .150 Parlement BeIge, The (t88o) -145 ...
Nors.. hale, The ( 1 975) ......'79 Parmee v Mitchell (1950) .....a72
Note (judicial Precedent) (1966) Parry v Parry and Adams and Mackay
. 127, 130.
(1962) .........216
132, 159.213
Nothman v Barnet London Borough Parry-Jones v Law Society (1968). .
(1978) Partington vA-G (1869) .....206
.........'75
Pasmore v Oswaldtwistle UDC (t 8g8) . 38
Nova Mink Ltd v Trans-Canada Airlines
Patel v Comptroller of Customs (1965( 18o .
( 1 95 1 ) .......204,234
Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory
Nowy Sacz, The ( tg ) .....128 Service Trustees (1979) . . . - 26. 217
Patttnson v Finningley Internal Drain-
age Board (1970) .......205
0 Pearce v Brain (1929) ......32
Pearson v Lambeth Borough Council
Oakes .. M i nster ''f War Tran,y-t /1950) ..........4!
1 944 .........205 Pegler v Craven (1952) ......:54
Ocean Estates Ltd v Pinder (1969) 282,285 i Penn-Texas Corpn v Anstalt (196 4 ) .253
O'Connellv R (i8) ......34 Penn-Texas Corpn v Murat Anstalt (No
O'Connor v Isaacs (1956) .....241 2)(t964) ........ . 140
Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Lucas Pennsylvania Coal Co v Mahon 260 US
(1 097 . . . . . . . 393 (1922) ........205
146,184
Ogopogo, The. Sec Matthews v Mac- People's Pleasure Park Co v Rohleder 6
Laren,Joncs and The Ogopogo South Eastern Rep 794 (1909) . .254
OKelly v Harvey (1883) .....30 Perry v Clissold ( ,o ) ......293
Okre,.,_ v Brent London Borough Coun- Perry v Kcndricks Transport Ltd
cil(,967) .........177 (1956)
Old Gate Estates Ltd v Alexander Perry vStophcr(tg5g) ......135
(150).......216.280 Petition of Right, Re )tg,) . . . . ic,g
Oldendorff(E L) & CoGmbH v Tradax Pettitt v Pettitt (1970) ... 163, 170, 173
Export SA, The Johanna Oldendorff Philadelphia National Bank v Price
149,213 155
Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor Philpot, Re (1960)
(tg81) Phipps v Pears (1965) ........26
.........208
Oppenheimer v Cattermole(ig 7 6) Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Trans-
88, 195,
port Ltd(i98o) .......210
219 Piddingtonv Bates (tg6o) .....30
O'Reilly v National Rail and Tram'.say
Appliances Ltd (1966) Pigney v Pointers Transport Services
.....212 Ltd (g)
Orri v Moundrcas (1981) .....262 ........245
Pigott (j H) & Son v Dock, and Inland
Osborne v Amalgamated Society of
Railwa y Servants (t9o9) Waterways Executive (1953) . .207
. . . Pilkington Bros Ltd W orkmen's Pension
Os borne v Rosslet, (1880) . . 126,140 Fund,Re(1953) ........253
Otto and Otto v Boltot, and Norris
Ptllai v Singapore City Council (1968) .208
(1936)
Pilling v Abergele UDC (1950) . . . 37
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller
Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co Ltd
SSCoPty ( 1 96 7) .......140 00) . . - ' -.

PAGE
Pinnel's Case (1602) .236
Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Lid v Secre-
tary of State for the Environment
(')
Pioneer Laundry and Dry Cleaners Ltd
v Minister of National Revenue
(1940) .........259
Playa Larga, The (Owners of Cargo
lately laden on board) v I Congreso
del Partido (Owners), Marble Islands,
The (Owners of Cargo lately laden on
board) v I Congreso del Partido
(Owners), I Congreso del Partido
(tgS) ..........217
Poland v Earl Cadogan (ig8o) . . .280
Polemis and Furness Withy & Co, Re
(1921) . . . . . . 128 , 1 47, 148
Portland Managements Ltd v Harte
(g) ......282, 285, 290
Post Office v Estuary Radio Ltd (1967) -179
Potts (or Riddell) v Reid (tg.,) . .
Poulton v London and South Western
RlyCo(t86 7 ) .......258
Powell v Apollo Candle Co (188) . .....213
.350
Pramatha Nath Mullick v Pradyumna
Kumar Mullick (1925) .....251
Prescott v Birmingham Corpn (1955): 68, 182,
209,223
Prestcold (Central) Ltd v Minister of
Labour (1968) .......t85
Pretoria City Council v Levinson
.........140
Priestley v Fowler (1837) .....211
Prince's Case, Re ( 160 ) .... . 93
Printing and Numerical Registering Co
v Sampson (t8 75 ) ......2t0
Pritchard v Post Office (1950) . . 135, 154
Processed Vcgetable Growers Associa-
tions v Customs and Excise Comrs: 73/
.........105
Proc lama tious' Case (161 1) . . . 53
Pryce v Belcher (1847) .....33,38
Pylkington's Case, Re ......93
Pyrenc Co Ltd v Scindia Steam Naviga-
0
tion Co Ltd 954) ......'79
Q R v Gaming Board for Great Bri. tain, ex
Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v
Haynes (1959) Rv Godfrey (1923) .......219
.......i6i
Quinn v Leathern (1901) Rv Gould (i968) .......216
. . .30, 146
R (MJ) (an infant), Re (1975) .206. .
R v Agricultural Land Tribunal for
South Eastern Area, ex p Bracey
(1960) .........135
R v Arthur (1967) .......254
R v Ashton-Rjckardt (1978) . . . .284
R v Ashwe[! (1885) .......283
R v Aston University Senate, ex p Roffey
(1969) .........so8
Rv Bishop (i975)
RvBlaue(1975) ........312
''H'-'' XXI
PACE
R v Board of Control, ex p Winter6oed
(1938) .......I73,2o2
R v Board of Referees, ex p Calor Gas
(Distributing) Co Ltd (' g M)
37
R v Bottrill, ex p KuedsenmeiMer
R v Bouchereau: 30/77 ( 1 97 8) . . .
.
Rv Bourne (,g3g) .......316
Rv Bourne (,952) .......245
R v Bow Road justices (Domestic Pro-
ceedings Court), ex p Adedigba
(1968) .......149, 184
RvBoyesen(,982) .......284
R v Brent Health Authority, ex p Francis
30
R v Buswell (1972) .......284
Rv Chapman (t959) ......2,6
R v Charlson . . . . 202,309
R v City of London Court Judge and
Pane(t89s) ........17I
R v Gockb'irn (1968)
RvCroft (ii,) .......245
R v Cunningham (1982)
R v Cunninghame, Graham and Burns
(tEES)
R v Customs and Excise Cornrx, ex p
Cooke and Stevenson (or ex p Cook)
Rv Davis (,87o) .......73
R v Deakin and Smith (t800) . .
Rv Decry (i 977 ) .......2I8
RvDelaval(t763) .......216
R v Dickson (7950) ......44 35
Rv Donovan (,934) tI4,312
R v Doody(i85 4 ) ........245
R v Dudley and Stephens (188 4 ) .229
RvDuric.alf(, 979 ) .......175
R v Dssnsheath, cx p Meredith (, g i) . . 38
RvDvtham(1979) ........232
.
Rv Earl ofBanbury(7693) . . . . 88
R v Electricity Comrs, ex p London
Electricity joint Committee Co (1920)
Ltd (1924) ........206
Rv Enoch (t833)
RvEnsor(,887)
R v Foley (i 88o) .......284
Rv Ford (,978) ......t17
p Benaim and Khaida (1970) . . .209
R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex p
Kolczynski(1955) ......2t9
R v Greater Manchester Coroner, ex p
Tal(i98 5 ) ........t27
R v Halliday (1917) . . , . ,gg, 200
R v Hampden, Ship Money Case
(1637) .........53,'tOI
R v Harding (1929) ......
R v Harrison-Owen (ii) . . 202,309
R v Hendon RDC, ex p Chorley (,g) .208
Rv Heron (,982) .......iSo
R v Hibbert(t869) .......s,6
R v Hudson ( tg ) .......283
R v Hussain (1969 ) .......284
RvICR Hatlm-T,,4(,,,.t


PACE
PACE .310
R v Sibbles (1939 .
R Industrial Disputes Tribunal, ex p .277
College. University of R Smith (1855)
Queen Mar y R s Somerset Justices, ex p E J Cole &

London (1957 .......211 PartnerS Ltd (1950) ......37
R v Industrial Injuries Comr, ex p
R V Spencer (1985) .......127
Amalgamated Engineering Union .......309
RvSpurge (196 1)
(tq66)..........13 Rs Steel (1981) ........312
.201 .......26t
R v IRC. cx p Rossmiflster Ltd 1980) R v Stewa:t (t84O
.......229
R lntan t 83 .309 R V Stocks 1921) .......216
R v Isirt (1978 . . . . R v Stokesky (Yorks) Justices CX p
. i6
R s Jsckson t8qt) . . 88 Bari ram ( 1956 ) .......141
R ',Jordon I i9671 . . .
R Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy
R sjist ice ofthe Peace forPcterborough, 208
(4) ......
ex pHickSit97 8 ) .....2O2,3t ......201 RvSinson (1900) .......284
R s Kemp('957( R v Tan (1983) ........312
R v Larsonfleur ( 1 933 ) .....246 . R v Tao (1977) .........285
R v Le es Justices, ex p Secretary of
.202 R s Thurborn (1849) ......284
State for Home Department (1972) ......180
. 88 R Titterton (1895)
• v Lincoln (Bishop) (1345 () . . .......216
RvTolsn(tEB9)
Rs Lipman (1970) .......310 .....207
R v Waddington (t8ot)
R'. McDonnell (1966) ......258
RvWheat (1921) .......216
herek ......312 R v Woking justices, cx p Gossage
R v Males 19621 .......17 208
(t973" .
.......
R' Marriott ( 1 97 11 ......284
Wood 1982) .......308
R
R v Metropolita n Police Comr, ex p
Rv Youn g (t953 5 ........141
Blackburn (1968) ......316 R and Lord Hunsdon v Countess of
n Police Com r , cx p
R v Metropolita
6 Arundel and Lord Howard (1616) . . g6
Blackburn 19801 ......31 Nicum of Hyderabad
Rahimtla
R, Nlilitarv Governor NDU Internment
(1958. ...........
Cap(t24.........96 Rail'avs Comr v Quinlan 1964) 149. 16
. .285
R' M,ford i97& .
Ramia CE Ltd
African Woods Ltd
1968" 54, 8, too. 367
R vNdhl' ,'. u
93.) ...........
I,) ...... .. 44
R' N: Ransom and Luck Ltd v Surbiton Bor-
R Ncark tq8ol .......308 .205
ough Council )t949 . . .
R v Nrth London Metropolitan Magis-
8 RalinsOn v Ames (1925 .....240
trat. cx p Havwocd . tq3C
R.......Application. A-G v....20
Butter-

R v N r t humberlafld Compensa tion A .130 worth t63l ......t6
a , 321
peal Tribunal. ex p Shaw (1951) Reade v Smith (1959) ......200
R v Oakes C 1959 ....... Redhridge (London Borough) v Jaques
R paddison 97 3( ......309 . 29
(1971 ...... .
RvPeaoont97 8 ' .......284 Regents of the University of California
......3013
R v Pettigrew 1980" v Bakke 438 US 265 (1978) . . . 66
........ . 1
R Poulton 8321 Regional Properties Co Ltd V Franken-
R Prioce (18751 ......' .2,6 schwerth (1951) .......a8o
.......2,277
R Purd y 19751 Regulation and Control of Radio Corn-
R Quick 1973( . ...309 .
munication tn Canada. Re (t932)
R v Rees es )t 839 . . . . '.' .261 Metropolitan Police omr
Reynolds
R v Rite s ......... 283 .20!
(1984...........
R v Robert Millar (Contractors) Ltd . .113
Reynolds V CS 98 US 145 (1878) .
............59
(19701 Richards v McBride (1881) . . . .173
R Rosse 1891 .......284
Richardson v London County Council
R Russell , 19641 ..........2 .......t66, 202
K v St Margarets Trust Ltd 11938) . .176 (1957,
River Wear Comm v Adamson (1876) . .173
R Secretary of Slate for Foreign and
Riverstone Meat Co Pty Ltd v Lanca-
Conamonea l t h ,Affairs, ex p Indian shire Shipping Co Ltd (t961) . 1 79, 218,
Association of Alberta (19821 . .330 269
R v Secretar y of State for Home Depart- Rivoli Hats Ltd v Gooch (1953) . . .135
p Bhurosah (i968) . . . . 29
me n1. cx Roadways Transport Development Ltd
R v Secretary of State for Home Dept,
vA-G(1942) ........295
pBh3anghU975 l . . . .t8
Roberta. The (L937) ......262
• v Secretary of State for Home Dept. . 68, 18, 182.
.....aoo Roberts v Hopwoc925) d (1
cx p Hosenball (19771 t99, 209,223
• v secretary of State for Home Dept,
......ii8 Robson v Headland (1948) . ..280
cx pThakrar (1974)
.
Rodriguez v Parker (1967) .....241
K v Secretary of State for the Environ- . . .217
- RodriguezvSPCYCr Bros (t9t9)
rncnt.c p Hacknes London Borough
 PAGE
Rolle v Whyte (1868) . i8o
Rollxwin Investments Ltd v Cromolit
Portugal Cutclars e Produtoa Metil-
icos St.RL (1970) ......257
Ronbar Enterprises Ltd v Green
(tg) . . . . . . . 211,259
Ronex Properties Ltd v John Laing
Construction Ltd (1983) - . . .
Rookes v Barnard (196 4 ) . 90,212, 263, 343
Roothv Wilson (1817) ......
Rose Mary, The. See Anglo-Iranian Oil
Co Ltd vJafl'rate, The Rose Mary
Ross v Caunters (1980) . . . 137, 139,204
Rosa-Clunis V Papadopoullos (1958): 183,200
Rowley, Holmes & Co v Barber (i) •.261
Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Co Ltd
Russell (1949) .......130
Royal Government of Greece v Gover-
nor of Brixton Prison ( 1 9 7t) . . . .219
Russell v Smith (1958) . . . . 283,284
RyanvR(t967) .......310
Rylands v Fletcher (1868) . 35, 137, 203, 301
Rysak v Rysak and Bugajaski (1967) . .235
Sabey (Clifford) (Contractors) Ltd
Long (tgg) ........93
Sagnata Investments Ltd v Norwich
Corpn ('97') ........184
Said v Butt (tgso) .......142
Salgoil SpA v Foreign Trade Ministry of
the Italian Republic: 13168 (1969) . .104
SalihvAtchi(tg6t) ......251
SalkeldvJohnson(orJohnston)(i84 8) .178
Salomon v Customs and Excise Comrs
(1967) ........179,218
Salomon v Salomon & Co (1897) 167, 254
Sanderson v IRC (1956) .....i8o
Saunders (Executrix of Will ofGallie) v
Anglia Building Society (197!). See
Gallic v Lee (1968) (1969)
Schlesinger v Schlesinger (196.') . . .135
Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home
Affairs (1969) ......30,434
Schneider v Dawscn (1960) . . . .243
Schorsch Meier GmbH v Hennin
147,219
( 1 975) . . . . . . .
Schtraks v Government of Israel (196 4) .219
Scowby, Re, Scowby v Scowby (1897): z6, ,
Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
(1962) .....140, 141,156,194
Seabrook Estate Co Ltd v Ford ( 1 949) . . 35
Seaford Court Estates Ltd v Asher
(1949) .......176,185
Searle v Wallbank (ig) . . . . .149
Secretary of State for Education and
Science v Tameside Metropolitan Bor-
ough Council (1977) . . . . 110,118
Seyfang v G Searle & Co (ig) .219
Seymourv Pickett (,go) .....242
Shalt v Barnet London Borough Council
(1983) .........176
Sharkey v Wernher (1g54) .....148
Shaw v DPP (1962) . . . . 149, 150, 216
PAGE
Sherratt (W A) Ltd v John Bromley
(Church Stretton) Ltd ( 1 98 ) . . .128
Shields v E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd
(1979) .........104
Shiffrnar, v Venerable Order of the
Hospital of St John of Jerusalem
(1936) .........37
Short v A-G of Sierra Leone ( 1 96 ) .195
Short v Treasury Comes (1948) . .255
Shuter (No 2), Re (igGo) . . .37,202
Sigsworth, Re, Bedford v Bedford
( 1 935) .........173
Simpson v Peat (,g 5 a) ..... . 141
Simpson v Wells (1872) .....188
Sinclair v Brougham (1914) -195
Sirros v Moore ...... 127
Small Nairne (1849) ......t35
Smith vBaker & Sons (1891) . .211
Smith vJago ('975) ......316
Smith v Mawhood (1845) .....176
Smith v Moss (, 94 o) ......244
Smith v Stone (t6 47 ) ......309
Smith (Colin) Music Ltd v Ridge
at6,a&o
Socia,al Fonda voor de Diamantarbeiders,
Antwerp v SA Ch Brachuicld & Sons
and Dougal Diamond Ca, Ant'*erp:
2-3/69 (1969) .......104
Societa Anonima Fabbrica Accumula-
tori (SAFA) v Amministrazione drlle
Finanzc(t 9 7 3 ) .....to4, 131
Solle v Butcher ( to ) . . . . 195,321
Sommersett's Case (1772) . . . '157,197
Sorrell v Smith (1925) ......30
South Staffordshire Water Co v Sharman
(1896) .......282,287
Southern Pacific Co vJcnsen 244 US 205
(1917) .........163
Southwark London Borough Council v
Williams (197 t) .......20t
Sovfracht (V/U) v Van Udens Sdae-
epvaart en Agentuur Maarschapij
(NV Gebr) ('g)
Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v Martin
& Co (Contractors) Ltd (1973) . 161, 215
Spears v Harsly (t800) ......242
Spencer v Hernmcrde (1922) . . . .241
Stadium Finance Ltd v Robbins (or
Robins) (1962) .......279
Staines UDC's Agreement, Re, Triggs v
Staines UDC (1969) ......37
Stamford, Spalding and Boston Banking
Co v Smith (1892) ......242
Starkowskiv A-G(, 954 ) .....194
State v Katsande (,g) .....119
State, The y Dosao (1958) . 5, 365, 3126
Staton v National Coal Board ( 1 957) . . 162
Statue of Liberty, The, M/S Sapporo
Macu (Owners) v S/T Statue of Lib-
erty (Owners) (1968) . . -. .308
Staveley Iron and Chemical Co Ltd v
Jones(19 56) ........
Stein v Lehoert (1962) ......32
Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd (1923) . . 32
Stephens v Cuckfleld RDC (t 96o) . . . 178
Stern's Will Trusts, Re, Bartlett v Stern
(1q62) .........s6o

PAGE
.236
Still, v Myrick (tBog)
SturckevS %V Edwards Ltd (t)Jp) . .247
Sullivan v Earl of Caithness (196): 272,278
Sullivan v Gallagher and Craig (,Fo) .212
Summers v Salford Corpn (1943) . 177,207
Sumner v Robert L Priestl y Ltd (ig) .173
Sussex Peerage Case 0 8 44 . . . .171
Sutton's Hospital Case (16 1 2). .258
Sweet v Parsle y (1970) ......285
S y dney Municipal Council v Common-
.......253
wealth (tgo.) funstall v Steigmanti (1962)
Sykes. Re, Skelton and Dson v Sykes
(1940) .........42
Syndicat Général de Fabricants dv Sc-
moulesde France (1970' .....107
T ('9'') .........259
Taff Vale Rly Co v Amalgamated
Society of Railwa y Servants (iqol) . .263
Tamlin v Hannaford (1950' . 210,264
Tanistry Case (16o8
......35
Tapp vJones(1B75'
Tassell v Hatlen (1892) ......236
Taiinton-Collins v Cr,mie (1964 . . .217
Ta y lor v Niunrow (1960) .....09
Techild Ltd v Chamberlain tq11( . .285
Teh CScng Poh (alias Char NIch s
P ,ihl ir Prosecu or. NI a Is '.51.1 I - . ui
Tennant v Whytock 947 - . . . 280
Tha).F.urpeTip51 lid fort
if Pak'staii. NI: nutrv of Fe) and
Agriculture, Directorate of Agricul-
tural Supplies (Imports and Shipping
Wing 1t975.........'3'
Theophile v Scdr-Grnrral ' igo) . . .218
Them (NI B s- %Vijvs ardena (t '110 .
Thomas V NIetroptliian Housing Corps
Ltd 1 9 36 .........279
Thonsa3vSakin5 -1935' .......3'
Thompson v Andre'. (1968 ' . . . .134
Thompson' Park f 1 94 .....38
Thompson v Thompson (,q6( . . .173
Thompson v Ward (t953- ... 2111.280
Thomson v NInyse (19111 ( - . . 13o,148
Thomson, St Catharines College, Cam-
bridge Matcr and Fellosss ) 1919) - .148
Thorne v Motor Trade .Association
(19371 ..... 33, 18, 196,208
Thorne and New Brunswick Workmen's
C)ntpensatinn Board (1962) - . - .264
Tick'icr v B,iz.e.-icoit i 1963 . . . .293
Tickoer v Hearn 1,96,1 .....280
Tidd. Re, Tidd V 0' erell 89) (I 35
Timber Lane Lumber Co v Bank of
America (1984' .......21f
Tolten.The(1946' .......
Tooth & Co 1.td vi tllver (t,)56) - - .231
- 272,278
Tossers&Co Ltd v Gray i I 9 61( .......104,434
28,
Trapp v Mackie ('979' . - . . -
Trebanog Working Men's Club and
Institute Ltd v MacDonald (1940) 26,
Treloar v Note (1977)
Trend t ex Trading CorpnvCentral Bank
of Noeri. Itn'
PAGE
['ricfus & Co Ltd v Post Office )tg) - .144
Friggs v Staines UDC (t 968). See Staines
CDC's Agreement, Re, Triggs v
SiainesUDC(1969)
frucuknt, The. See Admiralty v SS
Divina (Owners), The Truculent
rruman (Frank) Export Ltd v Metro-
politart Police Ccrnr ('977) - .202
fubantia, The (1924 ...... .277
Tucker v Linger (1883" - .192
.254
Tynan v Balmer (1967) - - 30
U
US v Lehigh Valley RR Co 220 US 257
USvRauscher 119 US 40 7 (1886) - - .219
Uranda v Commissioners of Prisons, ex
pNlatova(t966) .......55
Uganda Co (Holdings) v Government of
Uganda (1979'.' ......29,217
Ulster-Swift Ltd and Pig Marketing
Board (Northern Ireland) v Taunton
Meat Haulage Ltd, FransenTransporl
NV (third part( (1977) .. - 180,213
Ulverston and District Ness Hospital
Building Trusts, Re, Birketi v Barross
and Furness Hospital Management
......t54
Underwood A Li Ltd v Bank of Li, er-
p.ul and Martins (I 924) .....254
Unit Construction Co Lid v Bullock
(196o( .......258,259
United Dominions Corpn Jamaica) Lid
v Shoucai r i t 969) . - . . 240,243
United Engineering Workers' Union s
Ds-vanaanam President Eastern
Province ,Agricultural Co-op Union
Ltd (1968 .........12
United Railwa y s of Havana and Regla
Warehouses Ltd. Re (1961) . . . .147
Universities of Oxford and Cambridge v
Eyre and Spottiswoode Ltd (1964) - 199
Upton-on-Severn RDC '. Powell
(1942)
VvD(1927) 243
Vacher & Sons Ltd v London Society of
Compositors (1913 ) . - 39,171, 173, 178
Valentini v Canali (1889) ,... 32
Van DunHome Office (1974) - - .131
Nan Duyn v Home Office (No ): 41/74
(1975)
Van Geiud en Loot v Nederlandse Belas-
tingadministratie 20/62 (1963) - 104, 106
Vaughan sTaff Vale Rly Co (1860) - .205
Vauxhall Estates Ltd Liverpool Corpn
(1932) ........ . 8g
'- R.. '-.-4-- f,.'


PACE
PACE
'V W illiams v Glasbrook Bros Ltd . .129
WvW(t976) Williams v ilorne Office (198,)
W . . .206
Wabc v Taylor (1952) . aBc illiams Bros Direct Supply Stores Ltd
Wagon Mound, The (No 2). See Miller v Raftery (1958) .......a8
SS Co Ply Ltd v Overseas Tankship Willis v Association of Universities ofthe
(UK) Ltd, R \V Miller & Co Pty Ltd British Commonwealth (j965) . .262
Oversea-s Tankship (UK) Lid, The Willis v Brooks ...... 262
Wagon Mound (No 2) Willis & Co v Baddrley (1892) . . .
Wagon ound, The. See Overseas Tank- Willow Wren Canal Carrying Co Ltd v
ship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and British Transport Commission
Engineering Co Lid, The Wagon (1956)
Mound Wilson v Cha,terton (19 4 6) . . . .129
Wakeham v Mackenzie (1968) . . . .278 Wilson v Dagnall (1972) ......93
Walker Rowntre (1961) .....279 Wilson v Glossop (1888) . . . 157,195
Walker's Decision, Re (tg) . . .209 Wilson v Lombank Ltd (1963) . . .
\Vallerstejner v Moir (tm) . . . .259 Wilson (Lady) v Willes (1806) . . . .
Wallis's Cavton Ba y Holida y Camp Ltd Wilson (Paal) & CoA/S v Partenreederei
v Shell-Mex and BP Ltd ( i Hannah Blumenthal (1983) . . . .740
,) . 285,290
Walsh v Curry ( 1 95) .......43 Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English
Walsh 'John) ltd v S heffield City Coun- (1938) ......137, 148,212
cil and Tranter (1957) %Viltsh j re V Barrett (1965) .....176
Vankie Colliery Cos' IRC (t922) . . .185 Wimpey (George) & Co Ltd v Sohn
Warin g , Re, Westminster Bank Ltd v (1967) .........285
Burton-Butler (1948) 18, . . . 1 5 Wiseman v Bornensan (197 j) .209
Warner v Metropolitan Police Comr Wodehouse v Levy (1940) .....128
(1969) .....278,281,283,284 Wood v Leadbit,er (t845) . . . . 36,38
Warr (Frank) & Co Ltd v LCC (1903) . WoodagevMoss(,97 4 ) .......278
Warren v Keen (tq) ......'35 Woodford v Smith ( 1 97 0 ) .... . 263
\Varw,c1. Film Productions Ltd v Eisin- Woods v Martins Bank Ltd (t 959) . . .
ger (1069) ........'79 Wooldridge v Sumner (1963) . . . . 32
%Vasserberg, Re. Union of London and Worcester Works Finance Ltd v Cooden
Smiths Bank Ltd v Was.serberg Engineering Co Ltd (1972)
. .
128,--41
( 1 9 1 5 ) . . . . . . . . . 278 Wright v Walford (1955) .....t 84
\\'atrnre ';Jenkins (1962) .....309 Wurzel v Atkinson, Norfolk and Ward
Watson Bros v Ho'-nby (1942) . . . . 148 263
Waucho 0e v Maida (t97t) .....240 Wurzel v Houghton Main Home Deliv-
Waugh v British Railways Board cry Service Ltd (tg;) .....263
20. Wuta-Ofei v Danquah (t96t) . . . 285
Weller & Co v Foot and Mou'h Disease W y att v Kreglinger and Fernau (1933)
.207
Research Institute (1966) . . . . Wvcombe Marsh Garages Ltd v Foss ler
Wells v Derwent Plastics (t978) . . . , I (1972) .........175
Wenman v Ash (1853) ......26, Wyld v Silver (1962) .......88
West Bank Estates Ltd v Arthur (1967) .285 Wynne-Finch v Chaytor (1903) . . .129
West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish 300 US
( 1 937) ........184
West Ham Union v Edmonton Union x
(1908) .........49 X (a minor) Re (1975) ......ao6
Western Ground Rents v Richards
(1961) .........285
Western India Match Co Ltd v Lock
(1946) Y
.........38
Westminster Bank Ltd v JRC (1958) .149 Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd
Wheat vELacon&Co Ltd (t966) . 8 t27, 128, 145
Wheeler v New Merton Board Mills Ltd Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd
257 (146) .........132
Wicks v DPP ( tg ) ......172 Young v North RidingJustices (1965) . -135
Wiggins v Wiggins (otherwise Brooks) Young, James and Webster v United
and Ingram (t958) ......2,6 Kingdom (t98,) .......
Wigley v Leigh (1950) ......280
Wigzelt, Re, ex p Hart (192,) . . . .2,6
Wilkinsonv Chetham-Strode (1940) .138 z
Wilicock V Muckle (1951) .....8g
Zeidmar, v 0:en (1950) .....t4.a
Williams v Carwardine (1833) . . . .135
Zoernsc}, v Waldock (1964) . 219, 243, 310


Lkcwo'ts aJ the European Court of Just ice are listed below n2mersc ally.
77te;e decisioiti are alco included in theprfcediri olpi helical trot.

PAGE
PAGE
2-3/69: Scciaal Fonda voor de Diaman-
26)62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse
.. o, ,o6 tarbeiders, Antwerp v SA Ch Brach
Belastingadmiflistratie (1963) Cold & Sons and Dougal Diamond Co.
28-30/62: Da Costa en Schake NV
Nederlandse Administratie an Betas- Antwerp 1969' .......104
26 9 5)701 Amministrazionedelk Finanze
inen(1963 .......... dllo Staro v SACE SpA (1975 / . . .107
20-21 / 63: Re Im port of Pork (iq66) . 05
52:7': Intrnati0nale Handelsgcsells
i98,b3 Firma Nla Neumann v 1-laup- chaft mhH v Einfuhr- und Vorraiss-
izollami Hof Saa!e (1969 1 . . . . io6
telle fur Getreide und Futtermittel
2 44 63: Alma SpA v High Authority los
(1965) .........,o6
82/72: Re Frauds on Agricultural Levies
6/6 4 : Costa v Ente Nazionale per lEner- 104
gia Elettrica ( ENEL) (1964): 104, to6, 107 ( 1 974) ...............
57 16 5 : Firma Alfons LUtricke GmbH 41174 1 Van Duyn v Home Office (No 2)
(,g) . . . . . . . 104,434
Hauptzollarnt Sarrclouis (1971) . . . io6
73/71: Processed Vegetable Growers
16/6: MoIkerei-Zentrt Westfalen-
Lippe GmbH .. Hauptzollamt Pader- Associations v Customs and Excise
.......04,106 Comrs (1974/ ....... . lO
born (1969)
Molkerei-Zentrak Westfalen- 43 / 7 31 Defrenne v SA Beige de Naviga-
28167
Lippe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Pader- 'ion Abrtenne (1976) ..... . 105
born (,q68.......104,131 30/77: R v Bouchereau (1978/ . . . .200
106177: AmministraziOne delle F,nanze
13 1 68: Saloil SpA v Foreign Trade
dello Stato v Simmenthal SPA (No 2)
s1inistrv of the Ital:an Republic .........106
........ . 104 (1978)
(989/
PART I

Introduction
SUMMARY

PAGE

Chapter i Introduction 3
Chapter 2 Legal material 23
Chap!er 3 Rulc, laws and It-gal system 47