Professional Documents
Culture Documents
And
CPF & EXPORT PIPELINES
Revision Approval
Vice President of
Approval Lance McCarver, PE, PMP 17 Jan 2018
Engineering
The study will be held at the EGYPT Office (New Maadi ,Cairo), starting on the January 23. 2019 at 9.0 am,
and is scheduled to last presumably for one day.
The scope of this document is to provide the Term of Reference (ToR) for a HAZID session to be carried out
On the design proposed for the for the North Bahariya Development Project located in the West Desert of
Egypt.
In order to ensure that a systematic approach is adopted, the NORPETCO Field Development Project was
divided into a number of stages and ‘zones’ based on layout and the process.
1. Site Clearance
2. Construction
3. Export Pipelines.
4. Production Wells & Injection Wells.
5. CPF facility
For the HAZID, the team can use smaller areas or ‘nodes’. In this case they may consider each functional
block of the process. The particular hazards for each node can then be addressed
• The Team Leader will nominate a category from the checklist and then ask the team to consider
each guide word.
• In each case the team will analyse each guide word (helped by the examples given in the Checklist)
to identify any hazard and its potential effects which may then be entered on the worksheet.
• The brainstorming process will then be used to identify all the potential threats or causes of the
hazard. During this process the Team Leader may suggest examples from the ‘expanders’ section of
the checklist. It is important however that these expanders are suggested as examples and not
presented as a closed list which will restrict the team’s brainstorming activity.
• The team will analyse the appropriate controls that should be put in place to prevent or control each
threat. Again the Team Leader may suggest mitigation measures.
• Finally, the team will identify the development phase(s) for which the hazard is credible and assess
the HSE risk in accordance with the attached Risk Ranking Criteria (see par. 3.5)
Note, the HAZID Checklist (reported in Annex 1) is comprehensive but not exhaustive and the use of
brainstorming to identify novel or unforeseen sources may be required.
The purpose of the risk screening matrix is to classify hazards as being low, medium or high risk.
The three different colours classify the risk as:
• TOLERABLE RISK: Hazards classified as Tolerable risk are considered to have a negligible impact
and therefore no further impact reduction measures are required. Such hazards should however be
continuously monitored and managed for continuous improvement.
• COMPULSORY REDUCTION: Hazards classified as Compulsory risk are not intolerable when
considered individually, subject to the identification and implementation of appropriate control
measures to reduce their impact. Where several hazards classified as Compulsory risk coexist the
cumulative effect of the hazards may be intolerable. Where this is the case additional impact
reduction measures may be required.
• INTOLERABLE RISK: Hazards classified as Intolerable risk do not satisfy the screening criteria and
shall be considered intolerable without a detailed justification.
Following the HAZID Session, the Chairman shall be responsible for preparing and issuing the “HAZID
Report”, to be submitted to the Company for approval. The report lists the critical issues and shall include
The HSE discipline will send the ‘HAZID Action Response Sheets’ in charge to the relevant responder. The
response shall address the issue, be technically correct and fully auditable. When the response is
completed, the engineer will pass the action to the lead discipline engineer for endorsement, and then the
action is to be returned to the HSE discipline. The verification shall be addressed in a dedicated “HAZID
Close Out Report”, which shall detail the responses to each recommendation and shall contain evidence of
their implementation.
• Single word answers such as “Done”, “Added”, “OK”, etc. are unacceptable;
• Any answer which makes reference to a data sheet or study must have a copy of the document
annexed;
• If the reference document is lengthy, a copy of the relevant topic plus the document cover sheet will
suffice;
• If the action requires additions to a P&ID’s, layouts etc., a copy of the drawing shall be annexed with
the addition highlighted.
As a minimum, the following documents will be made available during the review for reference:
In addition to the core HAZID members shown above, the following personnel will be available on call to
provide input to the review:
If a preparation will be required for mark-up of relevant documentation or clarification with engineering
disciplines, this will be arranged in a one-day meeting before the HAZID session.
EXPANDERS
GENERIC SPECIFIC
(Examples of Guide Word Application, not
GUIDEWORDS GUIDEWORDS
exclusive)
Reputation Financial Loss
Shut Down Project
Collapse Share Prices
Adverse Publicity
Potential
Guide Existing Controls/ Ref Actions/Consideration
Hazard Cause/Threats Consequence L C R
Word Safeguards No. in QRA
& Effects