Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09.05.2014.
2
2. It is submitted that Sh. Rajiv Kumar, IPS was issued with a
said Sh. Rajeev Kumar, IPS did not join the investigation. It
Bengal had transferred all the chit fund cases and its
Cr.PC.
10. It is submitted that even after the CBI was entrusted with
destroyed.
12. It is submitted that the CBI obtained the original CDRs from
Incharge of SIT.
be required.
said FIR, the CBI could not register its own FIR [which is
Bengal.
8
16. It is submitted that incidentally M/s Rose Valley was facing
Rajiv Kumar] and few other chit fund companies with the
3.2.2019.
local police officers keeping Joint Director CBI and his family
the Joint Director [who was kept hostage with his family in
hearing.
investigation.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified at New Delhi on this the __ day of February, 2019. I, the above-
DEPONENT
14
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
IN
I A No. ______ of 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 401 OF 2013
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX PLEASE SEE INSIDE)
2 ANNEXURE A-1.
A true copy of the Notice under Section
160(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, issued by S.I Babai Bhatttacharjee to
Sh. Panjak Kumar Srivastava, IPS, The Joint
Director & Head of Zone, Central Bureau of
Investigation.
3 ANNEXURE A-2
A true copy of the Notice under Section 91 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, issued
by Office In charge, Bhowanipore Police
Station, to Sh. Panjak Kumar Srivastava,
IPS, The Joint Director & Head of Zone,
Central Bureau of Investigation.
4 ANNEXURE A-3
A table of list of cases with details
17