Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tuesdays 6:10-8:00
guster@gwu.edu
Wed 3-4
This class introduces and surveys the literature on the sociology and cultural study of
science and technology. The syllabus emphasizes the reading of a broad range of
intellectual and disciplinary perspectives, with a focus on the latest literature. The course is
structured around small, in-depth class discussions of selected works throughout the
semester. Because this is a discussion seminar, doing the reading and showing up each
week (on time) is essential. Students are graded on class participation and on the following
writing assignments:
1) Write 1 book review. It should be 3-4 double-spaced pages. You can choose any of
the books on the syllabus. The review should be handed in at the beginning of the
class in which the book is discussed. Book reviews turned in after class discussion
will not be accepted.
2) Write one paper at least 15 pages long on any technological artifact or scientific
controversy of your choice. Why was the artifact in question taken up in the form it
was? What personal relationships do people have with the artifact? How is it
represented in the media (if it is)? If writing about a scientific controversy: who
were the main parties? How did they seek to construct their authority? How was
evidence shaped and deployed in the controversy?
Learning Goals
By the end of this class, students will be able to:
Show familiarity with the main figures and schools of thought in the social study
of science
Think knowledgeably and critically about the literature in this field
Have improved research and writing skills
Read social science accounts with an eye to how they were constructed
Grading
First written assignment: 15%
Final paper 50%
Participation 35%
Class Policies
Attendance: attending all classes is a key to success in this course. The participation
component of the final grade registers both attendance at class and participation in class
discussion.
Extensions: No extensions will be given for assignments without a valid excuse such as a
documented personal medical or family emergency.
Religious Holidays: please contact me two weeks in advance if you are going to miss
class due to religious holidays not recognized by GWU’s academic calendar.
Time requirement
The provost now requires that faculty tell students how much of their time a class will
take. This class meets for 110 minutes a week, and each week students are responsible
for reading 6 articles or a book. The amount of time this takes may vary by student.
Academic Integrity
All students must practice academic integrity. This means doing your own work, and
when you use the words and ideas of others in any written work, you must: 1) identify
direct quotations with quotation marks; and 2) indicate the source of ideas that are not
your own by using social sciences notation form. If you have any questions at all about
what this means, you should speak to your TAs or the instructor. Plagiarism, and all
breaches of academic integrity (for example, the sale of lecture-notes from this class, or
the use of content from the internet as though it was your own), will be severely dealt
with in accordance with the University’s policies and procedures. For more information
on The George Washington University’s policies on academic integrity, consult:
http://www.gwu.edu/~ntegrity/code.html
SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM
DISABILITY SUPPORT SERVICES (DSS)
Any student who may need an accommodation based on the potential impact of a
disability should contact the Disability Support Services office at 202-994-8250 in the
Marvin Center, Suite 242, to establish eligibility and to coordinate reasonable
accommodations. For additional information please refer to: http://gwired.gwu.edu/dss/
UNIVERSITY COUNSELING CENTER (UCC) 202-994-5300
The University Counseling Center (UCC) offers 24/7 assistance and referral to
address students' personal, social, career, and study skills problems. Services for students
include:
- crisis and emergency mental health consultations
- confidential assessment, counseling services (individual and small group), and
referrals
http://gwired.gwu.edu/counsel/CounselingServices/AcademicSupportServices
Readings
Articles on the syllabus not marked with a URL will be available through Blackboard.
Students are responsible for acquiring, one way or another, the following books:
Sarah Lochlann Jain, Malignant: How Cancer Becomes Us. (University of California
Press, 2013).
Adriana Petryna, When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for
Human Subjects (Princeton University Press, 2009)
Gabrielle Hecht, Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade (MIT Press,
2012)
Natasha Dow Schull, Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas (Princeton
University Press, 2012).
Sheila Jasanoff, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United
States (Princeton University Press, 2007)
Jan 17 Introduction
Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, “ACTing UP: AIDS Cures and Lay
Expertise.” In Collins & Pinch, The Golem at Large: What You Should
Know About Technology. (Cambridge UP, 1998, pp.126-150).
Ruth Cowan, “How the Refrigerator Got Its hum” in Donald Mackenzie
and Judy Wajcman (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology (Open
University Press, second edition 1999), p.202-18.
http://www.sts-biu.org/images/file/COURSE%20READINGS/27-
815%20SCIENCE,%20TECHNOLOGY%20&%20SOCIETY/Cowan,%20How
%20the%20Refrigerator%20got%20its%20Hum.pdf
David Freedman, “Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science,” The Atlantic
November 2010,
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-
and-medical-science/308269/?single_page=true
George Will, “The hilarious hoax that should have taught the academy a
lesson,” Washington Post, January 12, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-hilarious-hoax-that-should-
have-taught-the-academy-a-lesson/2017/01/11/ffbbe1fe-d758-11e6-b8b2-
cb5164beba6b_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c
%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.fc5c9624b009
Ted Porter, “U.S. Army engineers and the rise of cost-benefit analysis” and
“objectivity and the politics of disciplines,” pp.148-216 of Ted Porter,
Trust in Numbers (Princeton University Press, 1996).
Geoffrey Bowker and Leigh Star, “What a Difference a Name Makes – the
Classification of Nursing Work,” pp.229-54 of Bowker and Star, Sorting
Things Out (MIT Press, 1999).
Geoffrey Bowker and Leigh Star, “The Case of Race Classification and
Reclassification Under Apartheid,” pp.195-226 of Star and Bowker,
Sorting Things Out (MIT Press, 1999).
Alondra Nelson, “Bio Science: Genetic Genealogy Testing and the Pursuit
of African Ancestry.” Social Studies of Science 2008 38: 759-783
Charis Thompson, “Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg
donation for assisted reproduction,” in Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Shades of
Difference (Stanford University Press, 2009), pp.131-147.
Charis Thompson, “Stem Cells, women, and the new gender and science,”
in Londa Schiebinger (ed.) Gendered Innovations in Science and
Engineering (Stanford University Press, 2008).
Adriana Petryna, When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global
Search for Human Subjects (Princeton University Press, 2009)
April 4 Risk
Ulrich Beck, “On the Logic of Wealth Distribution and Risk Distribution,”
The Risk Society (Sage, 1992), 19-50.
Paul Edwards, A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the
Politics of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2010) selected chapters