Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GUAYAQUIL
CAREER
COMMUNICATION
COURSE / GROUP
7460/2
Semiotics
TOPIC
Towards a semiotics of art
AUTHOR
KELVIN KLEINER BETTY SALINAS
TEACHER
Lourdes Ayala
Charles Sanders Peirce was a wise American able to overcome the rationalism of his
time, writing thousands of pages about a variety of scientific, philosophical and metaphysical
issues. Its fruits begin to grow a century after its departure from this world where the human
being as a sign, whose purpose or purpose is creativity and growth, tries to discover the
developed a theory of signs that I call "Semiotics"; his interest in disciplines such as
philosophy, logic, mathematics, and psychology led him to develop a symbolic logic.
In his search he was guided to find a universality of thought, from which it was
possible to understand the whole of the world. Sanders, known as one of the founding fathers
of semiotics, shared the honor with Ferdinand de Saussure, a contemporary linguist, who
proposed in his opinion the name of semiology. Indeed it differs from Saussure, because it did
not deal so much with the functioning of the language, but with more general aspects, the way
in which man knows reality. In effect, semiotics had to conform the frame of reference of any
investigation that allowed investigating the relation that the man establishes to the world.
Peirce says that "the sign is something that is for someone instead of something else,
its object, in some of its aspects creates in the mind of that person a more developed sign that
is its interpreting". That is, a sign is a mental representation through which someone can know
the objects of reality. According to this conception, the sign is a relation, where the entity
lacks importance. He adds that the sign consists of three components, since reality is a triad
and, consequently, his whole theory is based on systems and categories composed of three
elements.
The object: is the "portion" of reality that can be accessed through the sign. The
representative or sign: The representations of something, human beings access the "real"
world through a symbolic system. The representative would therefore be "the aspects of the
object", which we can get to know through a particular triad, but never the object in its
representation." This means that it is another sign that, now, is the sign that the representative
Both the representative and the interpretant are mental entities, it is not, therefore,
tangible realities. It is about symbolic operations that we carry out with the object to
understand the world that surrounds us. Peirce maintains, moreover, that knowledge is
inferential, which means that one sign refers to another sign and this to another and so,
successively ... example, if we see the wet street; we infer that it has rained. For something to
be a sign of something else, that thing must already be a sign. This means that if a "blood
stain" can be read as a sign of "wound", then we must know the sign "wound", which must
It is not possible to construct a sign for an object that is not a sign previously.
However, it is wrong to infer that, since every object of the sign is already a sign, then
knowledge always has as object knowledge and the reality before thought is inaccessible. In
effect, Peirce does not deny the existence of the world, but rejects the possibility of knowing