Ateneo de Naga University

Senior High School

CORE119 – Statistics and Probability

Performance Check Plan
Second Semester, S/Y 2018 – 2019

ENABLING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

1. The learner is able to apply an appropriate random variable for a given real – life problem (such as in decision making and games of chance).
2. The learner is able to accurately formulated and solve real – life problems in different disciplines involving normal distribution.
3. The learner is able to apply suitable sampling and sampling distributions of the sample mean to solve real – life problems in different disciplines.

OBJECTIVES
1. To apply an appropriate random variable for a given real – life problem (such as in decision making and games of chance);
2. To accurately formulated and solve real – life problems in different disciplines involving normal distribution;
3. To apply suitable sampling and sampling distributions of the sample mean to solve real – life problems in different disciplines;
4. To create a documented output which shows both creativity and accuracy;
5. To present a final output through a print media; and
6. To judge efforts of group mates in the given task.

PERFORMANCE TASK SCENARIO

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is conducting a research to confirm that the manufacturer of food products is complying with the prescribed
or indicated label of their products (e.g. content). The DTI wanted to make sure also that these manufacturers are following the Republic Act No. 7394 also
known as “The Consumer Act of the Philippines” specifically Article 77: Minimum Labeling Requirements for Consumer Products which states that all consumer
products domestically sold whether manufactured locally or imported shall indicate the following in their respective labels of packaging; a) its correct and
registered trade name or brand name; b) its duly registered trademark; c) its duly registered business; d)the address of the manufacturer, importer, repacker
of the consumer product in the Philippines; e) its general make or active ingredients; f) the net quantity of contents, in terms of weight, measure or numerical
count rounded off to at least the nearest tenths in the metric system; g) country of manufacturer, if imported; and h) if a consumer product is manufactured,
refilled or repacked under license from a principal, the label shall so state the fact.

As one of the researchers hired by the DTI, you are tasked to check and to investigate the food products if the manufacturers comply with part f of Article
77 of the RepublicAct No. 7394. You are going use the appropriate sampling methodology and present the corresponding sampling distribution and maximize
the use of several statistics concepts.
 Finally, you are going to answer the following questions:
1. What product did you choose to check and to investigate? Why?
2. What statistical processes or activities did you use in your study?
3. What particular sampling method did you use? Was it appropriate with your study? Why? How?
4. Did the company comply to part f of Article 77 of RA 7394?

You are to be evaluated according to the following: Content and Accuracy (45%), Organization and Presentation (25%) Creativity (10%), Cooperation
(10%), and Punctuality (10%).

TASK DESCRIPTION
This task is both an individual and a group performance check in which students will be given the task to formulate and solve real – life problems involving
random variables and probability distributions, normal distributions, and sampling and sampling distributions.

The students will make a sampling and sampling distribution of the product they have chosen. A random sample of at most 50. This number of units is vital
to the next part of the performance task. Add to that, proper documentation of this first part is required. The students are required of photos of the 50 random
samples, the sampling to be conducted, and the results (which include the appropriate tables and the values of point estimate). This will ensure the validity of
the task. Finally, this will have a separate grade and grading scheme to the second part of this performance task.

In terms of the final output, the group is expected to submit their output through print media. The following format should be observed: short size bond
paper, portrait, single spacing, 1” x 1” margin, Century Gothic, font size 10, and justified. It is expected that the list of the members (indicating ONLY their ID
Numbers) of the group is attached in the output (cover page).

The output should include the following:

 Introduction
- Sampling method used
- Statistical process
 Detailed record and findings shown in a frequency distribution table
 Interpretation of the data gathered
 Conclusion
 Credits (other people who contributed to the output aside from its members)

Since the students are tasked to be in a group, they are expected to rate, assess or give feedback to each of their group mate. There will be rubrics, a
standards set of criteria that will guide the students and will assess their output.

As an individual performance task, each student will have to submit a filled out sheet of the task. This will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Content and Accuracy (90%) and Punctuality (10%). The descriptions indicated on the analytic rubrics for the criteria will be applied. Attached is the
performance task sheet.

A. Target content and skills to be assessed

Identifying and solving real-life problems showing substance and applicability of topic learned
Content and Accuracy
Organization and Presentation
Creativity
Punctuality

B. Scoring Criteria
Attached is the rubric.

Analytic Rubric
 Excellent
(9 – 10)
Content and Gives complete recommended
Accuracy parts of the task and relevant
(45%) information; all prescribed
formats are followed; ideas are
well developed and thorough;
solution is accurate and is
detailed; is able to correctly
connect problem situation with
tabular and graphical
representations; main points
and details are properly
connected; is able to
communicate final answers; is
fluent, not choppy whatsoever
Presentation Overall, very good output is
and apparent; design/concept is
Organization unique and considerably
(25%) worked for with effort. Is able to
correctly connect problem
situation with data gathered in
order to come up with sound
decision; main points and
details are properly connected;
is fluent, not choppy
whatsoever.
Creativity Overall, very good output is
(10%) apparent; design/concept is
unique and considerably
worked for with effort; output is
with best quality
Very good
(7 – 8)
Gives complete
recommended parts of the
task and relevant information;
almost all prescribed formats
are followed (1 or 2 are
missed); some ideas are well
developed and thorough;
solution is accurate and is
detailed; is able to connect
problem situation with tabular
and graphical representations;
main points and details are
properly connected; is able to
communicate final answers; is
somewhat choppy and loosely
organized
Overall, good output is
apparent; design/concept is
somewhat unique. Is able to
connect problem situation with
the data gathered; main points
and details are properly
connected; is somewhat
choppy and loosely organized.
Overall, good output is
apparent; design/concept is
somewhat unique; output is
with best quality
documentation pictures
Good
(5 – 6)
Gives somewhat complete
recommended parts of the
task and little information;
some prescribed formats are
followed (3-5 are missed); ideas
are present but not developed;
solution is accurate and is
detailed; is somewhat able to
connect problem situation with
tabular and graphical
representations; main points
and details are properly
connected; is able to
communicate final answers;
Lacks logical sequencing of
ideas; ineffective ordering
Overall, fair output is apparent;
design/concept is somewhat
unique but considerable
rushed. Is somewhat able to
connect problem situation with
the data gathered; main points
and details are properly
connected; Lacks logical
sequencing of ideas;
ineffective ordering.
Overall, fair output is apparent;
design/concept is somewhat
unique but considerable
rushed; output is with no quality
documentation pictures
Needs Improvement Rating
(1- 4)
Hardly gives recommended
parts of the task and relevant
information; almost all
prescribed formats are NOT
followed; fails to communicate
final answer; answer is
plagiarized (no point); no
organization whatsoever; is not
able to connect problem
situation with tabular and
graphical representations;
manner of putting sentences
together indicated lack of
knowledge on how ideas
should be organized
Overall, the output needs
improvement; design/concept
is very usual; is rushed. No
organization whatsoever; is not
able to connect problem
situation with the data
gathered; manner of putting
sentences together indicated
lack of knowledge on how
ideas should be organized.
Overall, the output needs
improvement; design/concept
is very usual; is rushed; output is
not durable at all and with no
quality documentation pictures
 documentation pictures
Cooperation Overall, effort is greatly
(10%) seen/exerted; is able to
contribute very substantial part;
is always present during the
conduct of the task; and works
very well with the group.
Punctuality Submit the output on or before
(10%) the specified deadline.
Overall, effort is seen/exerted;
is able to contribute substantial
part; tends to be present
during the conduct of the task
(1 absence); and works well
with the group.
Submit the output a day after
the specified deadline.
Overall, effort is somewhat
seen/exerted; is able to
contribute a part; is somewhat
present during the conduct of
the task (2 absences); and
works well with the group.
Submit the output 2 or 3 days
after the specified deadline.
Overall, effort is not
seen/exerted; is somewhat
able to contribute a part; is
always absent during the
conduct of the task; and works
poorly with the group.
Submit the output 4 days after
the specified deadline.

The deadline of the submission of the output is on JANUARY 11, 2019. THIS RUBRICS MUST BE SUBMITTED TOGETHER WITH THE PERFORMANCE TASK OUTPUT. The
teacher will not accept performance tasks submitted 5 days after the deadline and a deduction of 10% of the total score for the late submission.

PERFORMANCE CHECK ACTIVITY SHEET

Name:Elan Francesca A. Bayta Section:HU13 Date:11.JANUARY.2019 Score:

Enabling Performance Standards:

1. The learner is able to apply an appropriate random variable for a given real – life problem (such as in decision making and games of chance).
2. The learner is able to accurately formulated and solve real – life problems in different disciplines involving normal distribution.
3. The learner is able to apply suitable sampling and sampling distributions of the sample mean to solve real – life problems in different disciplines.

My Evaluation to My Group Members (1-4, 4 being the highest)

NAMES RATINGS NAMES RATINGS

Member 1: Cecille Ocampo 4 Member 4:Kyell Lwin 3

Member 2:Dianne Bolina 4 Member 5: Simon Palino 2

Member 3: JC Magistrado 4 Member 6:Oliver Clutario 4

OUTPUT
1. What product did you choose to check and to investigate? Why?
Our Product is “Cracklings” because our group had decided to use this product, this product is easy to weigh.

2. What statistical processes or activities did you use in your study?

The statiscal process did we use in our study is collecting.

3. What particular sampling method did you use? Was it appropriate with your study? Why? How?
The particular sampling method did we use is random because it is unbiased.
 4. Did the company comply to part f of Article 77 of RA 7394?
NO

SELF-ASSESSMENT

1. I enjoyed the performance task because…

Even some of our groupmates did not help they are giving the group some iniative.

2. I believe that I have contributed to my group because …

We are assignment by a given task.
 3. I think that I failed to …
Help properly

4. Next time, I will be …

Actively participate in my group.