You are on page 1of 1

THE IMPORTANCE OF CALCULATION OF FINENESS

FITNESS MODULUS MODULUS (FM) FOR FINE AGGREGATE


By Bruce Suprenant SIEVE WEIGHT INDIVIDUAL TOTAL SUM TO
RETAINED PERCENT PERCENT CALCULATE

I
n 1925, Duff Abrams introduced (GRAMS) RETAINED, % RETAINED, % F.M.
the concept of fineness modulus
(FM) for estimating the propor- No. 4 9.2 2 2 Yes
tions of fine and coarse aggregates in No. 8 67.6 13 15 Yes
concrete mixtures. The premise: No. 16 101.2 20 35 Yes
“aggregate of the same fineness mod-
No. 30 102.2 20 55 Yes
ulus will require the same quantity of
water to produce a mix of the same No. 50 120.5 24 79 Yes
consistency and give a concrete of the No. 100 93.1 18 97 Yes
same strength.” Over the years, many No. 200 10.2 2 99 Yes
ready mix producers have verified the
Pan 4.5 1 100 No
wisdom of Abram’s premise.
ASTM C 33 “Standard Specification Total 508.5 100 FM = 283/100 = 2.83
for Concrete Aggregates” specifies
requirements for the FM of fine aggre-
gate, and ACI 211 “Standard Practice fine aggregate are No. 4, 8, 16, 30, 50, strength. In general, manufactured
for Selecting Proportions for Normal, and 100. The No. 200 sieve is included sands require more fines than natural
Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete” in a standard sieve analysis, but is not sands for equal workability.
uses FM to select the amount of coarse used to calculate FM.
aggregates for trial mix designs. ASTM C 33 requires the FM of fine CHECK FOR AGGREGATE VARIATIONS
Because FM is such a widely used aggregate to be between 2.3 and 3.1. Because changes in fine aggregate
index for aggregate proportioning, The higher the FM, the coarser the can significantly affect concrete prop-
most testing labs report the FM for aggregate. FM doesn’t define the erties, FM variations should be close-
fine aggregate with each sieve analy- grading curve, however, since differ- ly monitored.
sis. ent gradings can have the same FM. Concrete is proportioned using a
base fineness modulus determined
CALCULATING FM HOW AGGREGATE FINENESS AFFECTS from previous tests or, if no previous
Before calculating FM, lab techni- CONCRETE PROPERTIES tests exist, from the average of the FM
cians perform a sieve analysis to Fine aggregate affects many con- values for the first 10 aggregate sam-
determine the particle size distribu- crete properties, including workabili- ples tested. Aggregates delivered
tion, or grading, of the aggregate sam- ty and finishability. Experience has with a different FM than the base
ple. To obtain a grading, the aggregate shown that very coarse sand or very value may require an adjustment in
is shaken through a series of sieves, fine sand produces poor concrete the concrete mix.
nested one above the other in order of mixes. Coarse sand results in harsh For shipments of fine aggregate
size. The sieve with the largest open- concrete mixes prone to bleeding and from a given source, the FM shouldn’t
ings is on top and the one with the segregation. Fine sand requires a vary more than 0.2 from the base
smallest openings is on the bottom. A comparatively large amount of water value. (The purchaser may agree,
pan placed beneath the sieves catches to achieve the desired concrete work- however, to accept a greater base
material passing through the smallest ability, is prone to segregation, and value variation from a specific aggre-
sieve. may require higher cement contents. gate source.) If the fineness modulus
Coarse and fine aggregate usually Figure 1 shows that decreasing FM varies by 0.2, adjust the proportions of
are sieved separately. That portion of for a sand used in mortar requires con- fine and coarse aggregate. As the FM
an aggregate sample passing the No. siderably more cement content when decreases (aggregate becomes finer),
4 sieve is fine aggregate. After sieving, the water-cement ratio and slump are use a lower percentage of sand in the
a scale is used to weigh material held constant. However, a changing FM total aggregate or increase the amount
retained on each sieve and on the pan. has little influence on the cement con- of coarse aggregate.
FM is the sum of the total percentages tent required in concrete.
retained on each specified sieve divid- Usually, a lower FM results in more
ed by 100 (Table 1). The lower limit of paste, making concrete easier to finish.
the specified sieves is the No. 100 For the high cement contents used in
sieve and the actual size of the open- the production of high-strength con-
ings in each larger sieve is twice that crete, coarse sand with an FM around PUBLICATION #J940107
of the sieve below. The most common 3.0 produces concrete with the best Copyright © 1994, The Aberdeen Group
sieve sizes for calculating the FM of workability and highest compressive All rights reserved

You might also like