Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Act by defendant
2. Reasonable fear of immediate unlawful personal violence
3. No need for actual violence
Stephens v Myers
The claimant was bussed to work during a strike held by the nation union of miners, as the
claimant passed the picket line, the strikers made threatening gestures. It was held there was
no assault as police protection and the exterior of the bus protected the claimant from
immediate fear, no immediate threat of harm.
Tuberville v savage
If it were not assize time I would not take such language from you – no immediate threat
R v Ireland – silent phones calls can amount to assault reasonable expectation of immediate
personal violence.
Battery
Three elements
1. Intent
2. Direct application
3. Force
Collins v Wilcock
Claimant police officer had cautioned defendant prostitute. When she walked away. The
police officer took hold of her arm. The def scratched the officer’s restraining arm. Defendant
argues police officer had committed a battery in holding her. The touch of her arm was a
trespass.
Gone beyond the scope of duty in detaining the woman police officer had committed a
battery. Goff LJ .
Wilson v Pringle
Hostile touching
In an act of ordinary horseplay the defendant pulled the claimants school bag off his shoulder.
Court of appeal.
Re F Lord Goff intentional physical contact “not generally accepted in the ordinary conduct of daily
life”
Letang v Cooper
The claimant was sunbathing in a hotel car park when the defendant drove in an accidently drove
over the claimant’s legs. Claim in negligence time barred. Attempted to take a claim in trespass to
the person
Lord Denning-
If negligent and causing damage, it is tort of negligence and not trespass to the person.
Intentional – battery
Unintentional- negligence
Collins v Wilcock
Wilson v pringle
Nash v sheen
Dependant hair dresser was liable in battery when a tone rinse which caused a rash was given to a
claimant who requested a permanent wave.
Re B v NHS
A competent adult may refuse medical treatment even if the likely result will be death
Battery
1. Consent
Those who take part in sports also consent to a reasonable degree of physical
contact during the course of play, ie within the rules, even to the risk of being
unintentionally injured
The defence that the claimant consented to the injury or (more usually) to the
risk of being injured
2. Lawful arrest
Albert v Lavin
reasonable force by police officers or security guards to detain you against your will. In
order for their action to be lawful they would have to show that you were causing or were
about to cause a breach of the peace, or provoking others to cause a breach of the peace
by your actions.
Collin v Wilcox- no all actions Lord Goff- not all actions by the police will
provide a defence.
3. Self Defence
Reasonable use of force to prevent a crime
a person may use reasonable force to defend himself, another person, or his property
from attack.
4. Necessity
In Re F (above), a case concerning when medical treatment can be justified when
given without consent,
Lord Goff "not only (1) must there be a necessity to act when it is not practicable to
communicate with the assisted person, but also (2) the action taken must be such as a reasonable
person would in all circumstances take, acting in the best interests of the assisted person".
5. Provocation
Provocation, however, is not a defense available to the civil torts of assault or battery
Lane v Holloway
After a night at the pub, Mr. Lane, a retired gardener, returned home and was
talking outside as the disturbance broke out. He called Mrs. Holloway 'a monkey
faced tart', so Mr. Holloway felt the need to defend her honour. Mr. Lane threw a
light punch at the much younger Mr. Holloway, who punched Mr. Lane in the eye
so hard that it caused an injury requiring 19 stitches.
Although there were some precedents, Mr. Lane's provocation was not
considered to be relevant and could not be said to be contributory negligence
either.
False Imprisonment
Intentional or unintentional
Bird v Jones
Plaintiff, attempting to pass in a particular direction, was obstructed by the defendant, who
prevented him from going in any particular direction but one, not being that in which he had
endeavoured to pass. Held, no imprisonment
The claimant’s house was searched in her presence and she was arrested 30 minutes
later. It was unclear whether she was aware that she was not free to leave during the
period prior to her arrest.
Sayers v Harlow
Council negligent in maintaining the door handles led to a woman being trapped for a
short time . In order to escape she stood on the toilet and put her foot on the toilet role
holder which then spun causing her to fall – 25% deduction from damages
contributory negligence.
False Imprisonment
Intentional or unintentional
Bird v Jones
The fact that a person is not actually aware that he is being imprisoned does not
amount to evidence that he is not imprisoned
Meering was held in a room and questioned, because his employer though him to b a thief.
False imprisonment.
He got more money because he knew he was being kept there.
False imprisonment:
- if they know that they are held they get more money as if they were unaware
- they can sue even if they were drunk, unconscious, asleep.
The claimant’s house was searched in her presence and she was arrested 30 minutes
later. It was unclear whether she was aware that she was not free to leave during the
period prior to her arrest.
Bird v Jones
Sayers v Harlow
R v Brockhill prison.
Lawful arrest