Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289659988
CITATIONS READS
0 75
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Heri Kusuma on 09 January 2016.
Central composite rotatable design for investigation of microwave-assisted extraction of ginger (Zingiber
officinale)
AIP Conf. Proc. 1699, 050008 (2015); 10.1063/1.4938344
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
125.167.33.114 On: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 04:16:50
Box-Behnken Design for Investigation of Microwave-
Assisted Extraction of Patchouli Oil
Heri Septya Kusuma1, a), Mahfud Mahfud2, b)
1,2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
a)
Corresponding Author: heriseptyakusuma@gmail.com
b)
mahfud@chem-eng.its.ac.id
ABSTRACT. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique was employed to extract the essential oil from patchouli
(Pogostemon cablin). The optimal conditions for microwave-assisted extraction of patchouli oil were determined by
response surface methodology. A Box-Behnken design (BBD) was applied to evaluate the effects of three independent
variables (microwave power (A: 400–800 W), plant material to solvent ratio (B: 0.10–0.20 g mL -1) and extraction time (C:
20–60 min)) on the extraction yield of patchouli oil. The correlation analysis of the mathematical-regression model indicated
that quadratic polynomial model could be employed to optimize the microwave extraction of patchouli oil. The optimal
extraction conditions of patchouli oil was microwave power 634.024 W, plant material to solvent ratio 0.147648 g ml-1 and
extraction time 51.6174 min. The maximum patchouli oil yield was 2.80516% under these optimal conditions. Under the
extraction condition, the experimental values agreed with the predicted results by analysis of variance. It indicated high
fitness of the model used and the success of response surface methodology for optimizing and reflect the expected extraction
condition.
Keywords: Microwave-assisted extraction; Patchouli oil; Extraction; Box-Behnken design; Pogostemon cablin
INTRODUCTION
Patchouli oil is obtained from the leaves of Pogostemon cablin (patchouli), a plant of the Lamiaceae family,
originating from Malaysia and India [1]. It is an important essential oil (EO) in the perfume industry, used to
give a base and lasting character to a fragrance [2,3,4]. The EO is very appreciated for its characteristic pleasant
and long lasting woody, earthy, and camphoraceous odor, as well as for its fixative properties, being suitable for
use in soaps and cosmetic products [5,6]. It is also on the FDA’s (Food and Drug Administration) list of
substances approved for human consumption, in section 172.510, as a natural additive for food flavoring [7].
Moreover, the plant (Pogostemon cablin) is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine as it offers various
types of pharmacological activity according to the composition of the oil [1,8].
Since there is no synthetic replacement for patchouli oil, the demand is very high in the international
markets. The world demand of patchouli oil is currently stood at 587 tons per annum. The demand of patchouli
has never stopped increasing. It is anticipated that the price of patchouli will remain high in the future because
of high demand of patchouli worldwide and introduction of new application of patchouli oil. In view of the
importance of patchouli oil to many sectors of industries, it would be benefitial to improve the production of
patchouli oil. As a result of this, prospects for discovering method of inducing patchouli production are very
promising. It is expected that through understanding of the mechanism of patchouli extraction, there will be
sufficient supply to meet market demands. Therefore, there is strong incentive to optimize the patchouli oil
extraction yield.
In recent years, the use of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of constituents from plant material has
shown tremendous research interest and potential [9]. The principle of heating during MAE is based on the
direct effect of the microwaves on molecules by ionic conduction and dipole rotation within the processed
materials. Ionic conduction caused by the electrophoretic migration and the dipole rotation of realignment of
ions under an applied electromagnetic field results in the rise of temperature within the extraction solution. This
heating mode obviously enhances the transfer progress of objective solute within material matrix toward
solution [10].
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the microwave-assisted extraction apparatus used in this study.
xi xz
xi , i = 1,2,3...k (2)
xi
where xi, is the dimensionless value of an independent variable; Xi, the real value of an independent variable; Xz,
the real value of an independent variable at the center point; and ∆Xi, step change of the real value of the
variable i. Seventeen experiments were designed with five replications by BBD using the following equation
(Table 1), [15,16]
N 2 K ( K 1) Co (3)
where K is number of factors and C0 is the number of central point. The correlation between the response and
independent variables was evaluated by developing the second order polynomial mathematical model and the
generalized form of equation is given below [17]
Y o i X i i i X 2i
k k k
ii X i X j e (4)
i 1 i 1 i 1
Later, developed mathematical models were used to plot the 3D response surface contour graphes in order to
study the interactive effect of independent variables on the response and validation of developed models was
carried out by plotting actual versus predicted graph and ANOVA. Finally, numerical optimization was
employed to optimize the process variables for higher betalain content from dragon fruit peel using MAE.
TABLE 1. Ranges of independent variables and their levels.
Factor level
Independent variables
-1(-α) 0 1(+α)
Microwave power (W) (A) 400 600 800
Plant material to solvent ratio (g mL-1) (B) 0.10 0.15 0.20
Extraction time (min) (C) 20 40 60
TABLE 4. The significance of each response variable effect showed by using F ratio and p value in the nonlinier second
order model.
Variables DFa SSb MSc F-value p-Valued
Linier effects A 1 0.5100 0.5100 20.4200 0.0027
B 1 0.0370 0.0370 1.4800 0.2625 nse
C 1 0.0490 0.0490 1.9800 0.2018 nse
Quadratic effects A2 1 1.8400 1.8400 73.9600 <0.0001
B2 1 0.5400 0.5400 21.5900 0.0024
C2 1 0.0260 0.0260 1.0500 0.3398 nse
Interaction effects AB 1 0.0006 0.0006 0.0240 0.8806 nse
AC 1 0.0003 0.0003 0.0120 0.9165 nse
BC 1 0.0038 0.0038 0.1500 0.7087 nse
a
Degree of freedom
b
Sum of squares
c
Mean sum of squares
d
p values <0.05 were considered to be significant
e
ns: not significant
The predicted values calculated from Eq. (5) were in very good agreement with the experimental values, as
shown in Fig. 2. Hence, this quadratic model is well suited for this experimental set up.
Perturbation plot
Perturbation plot shows the comparison between all factors at a selected point in the considered design
space. The perturbation plot for the yield of patchouli oil is shown in Fig. 3. The yield response was drawn by
changing only one factor over its range while the other factors were held constant. The plot demonstrates the
effect of all factors at a central point in the design space (e.g., microwave power, plant material to solvent ratio
and extraction time). All factors indicated a positive effect on the yield of patchouli oil. The relatively flat line
of extraction time shows lower effect of this factor on the yield of patchouli oil in the design space. It can be
seen from Eq. (5) and Table 4 the perturbation plot that microwave power and plant material to solvent ratio had
significant curvature effect. The steep curvature in plant material to solvent ratio behavior demonstrated the
response of yield of patchouli oil % was very rapid to these factors. Through the comparison of coefficients in
Eq. (5), the most significant parameter was determined. In this manner, the order of positive influence of the
individual terms on the obtained yield of patchouli oil response was plant material to solvent ratio, microwave
power and extraction time.
FIGURE 3. Pertubation plot for rate response (for A: microwave power, B: plant material to solvent ratio and C: extraction
time).
Fixed extraction time: 40 min Fixed plant material to solvent ratio: 0.15 g ml-1
In Figs. 4a and 5a, when the 3-D response surface plot and the contour plot were developed for the yield of
patchouli oil with varying microwave power and plant material to solvent ratio at fixed extraction time 40 min.
The yield of patchouli oil was increasing evidently as the increasing of microwave power and plant material to
solvent ratio, and nearly reached a peak at the moderate microwave power and plant material to solvent ratio
tested. The highest extraction yield occured at microwave power 634 W and plant material to solvent ratio 0.14
g ml-1.
In Figs. 4b and 5b, when the 3-D response surface plot and the contour plot were developed for the recovery
of patchouli oil with varying microwave power and extraction time at fixed plant material to solvent ratio 0.15 g
ml-1, it can be seen that maximum recovery of patchouli oil can be achieved when microwave power and
extraction time were 634 W and 52 min, respectively.
Figs. 4c and 5c shows the effect of the plant material to solvent ratio and extraction time on the yield of
patchouli oil at a fixed microwave power 600 W. At a definite extraction time, the yield of patchouli oil
increased slightly as the increasing of plant material to solvent ratio and nearly reached a peak at the moderate
plant material to solvent ratio tested. It can be seen that maximum recovery of patchouli oil can be achieved
when plant material to solvent ratio and extraction time were around 0.14 g ml -1 and 52 min, respectively.
It can be concluded that optimal extraction conditions of patchouli oil was microwave power 634.024 W,
plant material to solvent ratio 0.147648 g ml-1 and extraction time 51.6174 min (Fig. 6). At this optimized
condition, the predicted yield of the patchouli oil was 2.80516%.
FIGURE 6. Graphical optimization of extraction yield of patchouli oil (%) and its desirability
CONCLUSIONS
Box-Behnken response surface experimental design (BBD) has proved to be effective in estimating the
effect of three independent variables; microwave power, plant material to solvent ratio and extraction time on
the patchouli oil yield and for predicting the optimal operational conditions. The experimental results showed
that linear terms of two independent variables (microwave power and plant material to solvent ratio) had
significant effects on the response value. Based on the analysis of variance and the agreement of the
experimental and predicted results, it can be concluded that the generated model was suitable for the simulation
of microwave-assisted extraction of patchouli oil with any combination of tested variables. The optimal
conditions were as follows: microwave power 634.024 W, plant material to solvent ratio 0.147648 g ml-1 and
extraction time 51.6174 min. At this optimized condition, the predicted yield of the patchouli oil was 2.80516%.
REFERENCES
1. L. F. Hu, S. P. Li, H. Cao, J. J. Liu, J. L. Gao, F. Q. Yang, and Y. T. Wang, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 42,
200–206 (2006).
2. M. Singh, S. Sharma, and S. Ramesh, Ind. Crops Prod. 16, 101–107 (2002).
3. A. Srikrishna and G. Satyanarayana, Asymmetry 16, 3992–3997 (2005).
4. C. Wildwood, O livro dos perfumes (São Paulo, Brazil, 1994).
5. F. Deguerry, L. Pastore, S. Wu, A. Clark, J. Chappell, and M. Schalk, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 454, 123–
126 (2006).
6. T. J. Betts, J. Chromatogr. A 664, 295–300 (1994).
7. Federal Regulations Code. Food and Drugs Administration, from the U.S. Government Printing Office via
GPO Access [CITE: 21CFR172.510], U.S.A., 3 pp. 49–52 (2002).
8. J. Wu, X. Lu, W. Tang, H. Kong, S. Zhou, and G. Xu, J. Chromatogr. A 1034, 199–205 (2004).
9. J. Song, D. Li, C. Liu, and Y. Zhang, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 12, 282–287 (2011).
10. Z. Xianzhe, Y. Fangping, L. Chenghai, and X. Xiangwen, J. Northeast Agric. Univ. (Engl. Ed.) 18, 79–86
(2011).
11. K. Zhong, W. Lin, Q. Wang, and S. Zhou, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 51, 612–617 (2012).
12. C. Da Porto, D. Voinovich, and A. Natolino, J. Supercrit. Fluids 68, 45-51 (2012).
13. J. Azmir, I. S. M. Zaidul, M. M. Rahman, K. M. Sharif, F. Sahena, and M. H. A. Jahurul, Ind. Crops Prod.
52, 405-412 (2014).
14. B. Prakash, R. Shukla, P. Singh, P. K. Mishra, N. K. Dubey, and R. N. Kharwar, Food Res. Int. 44, 385–
390 (2011).
15. V. K. Raina, S. K. Srivastava, and K. V. Syamasunder, Flav. Fragr. J. 18 (1), 18–20 (2003).
16. R. Randhir, Y. I. Kwon, and K. Shetty, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 9, 355–364 (2008).
17. K. Thirugnanasambandham, V. Sivakumar, and P. Maran, Carbohyd. Polym. 112, 622–626 (2014).
18. Z. Hu, M. Cai, and H. H. Liang, Sep. Purif. Technol. 61 (3), 266-275 (2008).
19. C. H. Chan, R. Yusoff, G. C. Ngoh, and F. W. L. Kung, J. Chromatogr. A 1218, 6213–6225 (2011).
20. C. S. Eskilsson and E. Björklund, J. Chromatogr. A 902, 227–250 (2000).
21. V. Mandal, Y. Mohan, and S. Hemalath, Phcog. Rev. 1 (1), 7–18 (2007).
22. P. Tatke and Y. Jaiswal, Res. J. Med. Plants 5, 21–31 (2011).
23. M. A. Desai, J. Parikh, and A. K. De, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92, 798-803 (2014).
24. Y. Wang, J. You, Y. Yu, C. Qu, H. Zhang, and L. Ding, Food Chem. 110 (1), 161–167 (2008).
25. R. L. Mason, R. F. Gunst, and J. L. Hess, Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments: With
Applications to Engineering and Science, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics (John
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989).