Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDRE 146
Educational Testing and Assessment
B. Rationale
The course addresses the Assessment and Reporting Domain of the Philippine Professional Standards for
Teachers (DO 42, s. 2017) which expects teachers to be able to “apply a variety of assessment tools and strategies
in monitoring, evaluating, documenting and reporting learners’ needs, progress and achievement.”
C. Course Outline
1. Course Outcomes (CO)
Upon completion of the course, students should be able to:
CO 1. Explain the role of assessment in the teaching-learning process;
CO2. Explain issues surrounding educational assessment;
CO 3. Demonstrate working knowledge of basic concepts in psychometrics through a combination of
study and analysis of test item data;
CO 4. Construct a valid and reliable classroom test;
CO 5. Use computer software to analyze assessment data;
CO 6. Utilize test results to inform instruction.
2. Course Content
Lecture Topics
I. Introduction to Educational Testing and Assessment
- History, role, principles, functions, limitations, and issues surrounding it
II. Different types of tests and what they measure
- Achievement Test
* Table of Specifications
* Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
- Aptitude Test
- Diagnostic Test
- Intelligence Test
- Career Test
- Personality Test
III. Classical test theory and Item Response Theory
IV. Reliability and its importance
- Types of reliability
V. Validity and its importance
- Types of validity
- Guidelines for administering tests
VI. Different types of test items and how they are constructed
- Selected item response (Multiple Choice, Matching Type, True-False)
- Constructed item response (Short-answer and completion, Essay items
(restricted and extended))
VII. Other forms of assessment
- Portfolio
- Performance-based
- Rubric construction
VIII. Levels of Measurement and its importance
IX. Basic descriptive statistics
- Measure of central tendency and dispersion
- Frequency tables and graphical representations of data
X. Item analysis and distracter analysis
XI. Norms and percentiles
- Norm-referenced scores
- Criterion-referenced scores
- Quantiles
- Normal distribution
XII. Differential Item Functioning and Test bias
XIII. The law, testing, and ethics
- Issues on testing
3. Course Schedule
9 Aug Discuss the Introduction to How did testing Lecture- R21. pp 1-22
history of educational testing start? discussion
educational and assessment
testing and (history, role, Why do
assessment, what principles, testing?
and why we functions,
assess, and some limitations, and
What are the
issues issues surrounding
different issues
surrounding it)
assessment surrounding
testing?
Discuss the
different
legislations and
policies that
affect the use of
tests in society.
Week Date Learning Topics Essential/ Teaching and Readings/
Outcomes Key Questions Learning Learning
Activities Resources
2 14 Aug Discuss the Introduction to How did testing Lecture- R21. pp 1-22
history of educational testing start? discussion
educational and assessment
testing and (history, role, Why do
assessment, what principles, testing?
and why we functions,
assess, and some limitations, and
What are the
issues issues surrounding
different issues
surrounding it)
assessment surrounding
testing?
Discuss the
different
legislations and
policies that
affect the use of
tests in society.
16 Aug Compare teacher Different types of What are the Lecture- R21 pp 199-316
made with tests and what advantages and discussion
standardized tests they measure disadvantages
of a teacher- Reporting (3)
Construct a table -Achievement made test as
of specifications Tests opposed to a
(TOS) *Table of
standardized
specifications
test?
Discuss other *Revised
types of test and Bloom’s
what they Taxonomy How do you
measure. construct a
table of
specifications?
No meeting but
will be available
for consultation.
10 9 Oct Midterm Exam
11 Oct Discuss other Other forms of How do you Lecture-
Week Date Learning Topics Essential/ Teaching and Readings/
Outcomes Key Questions Learning Learning
Activities Resources
types of assessment construct discussion
assessment and -Portfolio rubrics for
what they -Performance- alternative Reporting (3)
measure based assessment?
-Rubrics
Discuss the
(dis)advantages
of these
alternative
assessments
Construct a set of
rubrics
11 16 Oct Discuss other Other forms of How do you Collaborative
types of assessment construct work
assessment and -Portfolio rubrics for
what they -Performance- alternative Critiquing of
measure based assessment? rubrics
-Rubrics
Discuss the
Constructing
(dis)advantages
rubrics for
of these
alternative critiquing rubrics
assessments and TOS
Construct a set of
rubrics
18 Oct Perform some Levels of How do use Lecture
basic statistics measurement and descriptive
computations its importance statistics to Peer tutorial
(measures of interpret test
centre, variability, results?
and correlation)
12 23, 25 Perform some Basic descriptive How do use Lecture
Oct basic statistics statistics descriptive
13 30 Oct computations -Measure of statistics to Peer tutorial
(measures of central tendency interpret test
centre, variability, and dispersion results?
and correlation) -Frequency tables
and graphical
representations
of data
1 Nov Holiday
14 6 Nov Prepare
achievement
test results for
Project 2
8 Nov Compute for Item Analysis and What are the Lecture R21 pp 151-176
15 13, 15 discrimination distracter analysis characteristics
Nov index and index of a good test Workshop on
of difficulty item? using spreadsheet
Interpret the
indices for test
development and
item-writing
16 20 Nov No formal Project (item
Week Date Learning Topics Essential/ Teaching and Readings/
Outcomes Key Questions Learning Learning
Activities Resources
meeting but analysis report)
will be
available for
consultation
22 Nov Interpret Norms and How do you Workshop on R21 pp 83-110
17 27, 29 performance on a percentiles interpret using spreadsheet
Nov test using raw -Norm- performance on
scores and using referenced a test?
the reliability of a scores
test -Criterion-
referenced
Utilize test results scores
to inform -Quantiles
instruction -Normal
distribution
18 4 Dec Discuss the Differential Item How do you Lecture- R21 pp 319-
different models Functioning and make a test that discussion 356
of test bias Test bias is bias-free?
4. Course Requirements
Class Participation and Attendance 10%
Exercises and Assignments 10%
Reporting 15%
Midterm Exam 15%
Final Exam 20%
Project 1 (Achievement test) 15%
Project 2 (Item analysis report) 15%
5. Classroom policies
5.1 All requirements shall be submitted online via UVLE. Late submissions will incur a 5% deduction per
day late (including weekends and holidays).
5.2 Anticipated absences must be communicated asap. You will be dropped from the roll if you incur at
least 7 absences. ATTENDANCE (Revised UP Code: Art. 346)
“When the number of hours lost by absence of a student reaches 20% of the hours of recitation,
lecture, laboratory, or any other scheduled work in one (1) subject, s/he shall be dropped from the
subject; provided, a faculty member may prescribe a longer attendance requirement to meet special
needs. If the majority of the absences is excused, a student shall not be given a grade of 5.00 upon
being thus dropped (often referred to as “forced drop”); but if the majority of the absences are not
excused, the student shall be given a grade of 5.00 upon being thus dropped. Time lost by late
enrolment shall be considered as time lost by absence.”
5.3 Come to class on time. Grace period of 10mins will be given, after which you will be marked as late. 3
lates = 1 unexcused absence.
R1. Addressing achievement gaps (2009). Policy notes: News from the ETS Policy Information Center.
17(1), Winter. Retrieved January 12 at http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICPN171.pdf.
R2. American Association of School Administrators. (1997). Competency standards in student assessment
for educational administrators. Retrieved January 21, 2007 at
http://www.unl.edu/buros/bimm/html/article4.html.
R3. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education & National
Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of
students. Retrieved January 21, 2007 at: http://www.unl.edu/buros/bimm/html/article3.html.
R4. American Psychological Association. (2002). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association. (5th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
R5. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New
York: McKay.
R6. Busick, H. & Stone, E. (2011). Recommendations for conducting differential item functioning (DIF).
Analyses for students with disabilities based on previous DIF studies. ETS RR-11-34.
R7. Coaley, K. (2014). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. Los Angeles, CA:
SAGE.
R8. Cumming, J. J. (2008). Legal and educational perspectives of equity in assessment. Assessment in
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(2), 123-135.
R9. Diederich, P. B. (1973). Short-cut statistics for teacher-made tests. Retrieved January 20, 2007 at
http://www.unl.edu/buros/biaco/pdf/teachermade.pdf.
R10. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J.B. Baron and J. J.
Sternsberg (Eds.) Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: W. H. Freeman.
R11. Griffin, P. (2018). Assessment for teaching. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University
Press.
R12. Kirpes, A. L. & Price, C. (2009). Demystifying assessments: Understanding the test development
process in large-scale assessments. Edge, January/February, 4(3), 3-19.
R13. Koelsch, N., Estrin, E., & Farr, B. (1995). Guide to developing equitable performance assessments.
San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
R14. Koretz, D. M. (2008). Measuring up : what educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
R15. Magno, C. (2010). A brief history of educational assessment in the Philippines. Educational
measurement and evaluation review. 1, 140-149. Retrieved from
http://nespap.unescobkk.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/A-Brief-History-of-Educational-
Assessment-in-the-Philippines.pdf.
R16. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes. Performance
assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
R17. Nitko, A.J. (2007). Using Mental Measurement Yearbook Review and other materials to evaluate a
test. Retrieved January 21, 2007 at: http://www.unl.edu/buros/bimm/html/lesson02.html.
R18. Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment of students. Boston: Pearson.
R19. Plake, B. S., Buckendahl C. W. & Impara, J. C. ( 2004). Classroom-based assessment system for
science: A model. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
R20. Quellmalz, E. S. (1987). Developing reasoning skills. In J.B. Baron and J. J. Sternsberg (Eds.)
Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: W. H. Freeman.
R21. *Salkind, N. (2013). Tests and measurement for people who (think they) hate tests and measurement.
Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications.
R22. Salkind, N. (2014). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Thousand Oaks, Calif. :
SAGE Publications.
R23. Southwest Regional Development Laboratory. Reading assessment database-overview. Retrieved
January 13, 2011 at http://www.sedl.org/reading/rad/.
R24. Stiggins, R. (2008). Assessment For learning. The achievement gap and truly effective schools.
Portland: ETS Assessment Training Institute. Retrieved January 16, 2012 at
http://www.ets.org/Media/Conferences_and_Events/pdf/stiggins.pdf.
R25. Thomas, C.L. (2002). AvalioanoeducacionalnosEstadosUnidos: um impeto para areforma da Escola
Pablica (Educational assessment in the U.S.A.: An impetus for public school reform). In
Associao de Professores de Portuguese (Ed.), Portugue Association de Professores de
Professorespropostas para o futuro 3. Lisboa, Portugal: Associao de Professores de Portuguese.
R26. Wren, S. (2001). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Austin, TX. Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory.
R27. Wren, S. (2011). Methods of assessing cognitive aspects of early reading development. Retrieved
January 13, 2011 at The Southwest Educational Development Laboratory • www.sedl.org.