Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
G.R. No. 107383. February 20, 1996.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
700
drawers and cabinets of the other and in ransacking them for any telltale
evidence of marital infidelity. A person, by contracting marriage, does not
shed his/her integrity or his right to privacy as an individual and the
constitutional protection is ever available to him or to her.
Same; Same; Same; Same; The law insures absolute freedom of
communication between the spouses by making it privileged.—The law
insures absolute freedom of communication between the spouses by making
it privileged. Neither husband nor wife may testify for or against the other
without the consent of the affected spouse while the marriage subsists.
Neither may be examined without the consent of the other as to any
communication received in confidence by one from the other during the
marriage, save for specified exceptions. But one thing is freedom of
communication; quite another is a compulsion for each one to share what
one knows with the other. And this has nothing to do with the duty of
fidelity that each owes to the other.
MENDOZA, J.:
701
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168a75fd525948a3294003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/6
2/1/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 253
702
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168a75fd525948a3294003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/6
2/1/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 253
_______________
703
Dr. Martin finally admitted the truth and authenticity of the questioned
annexes. At that point in time, would it have been malpractice for
respondent to use petitioner’s admission as evidence against him in the legal
separation case pending in the Regional Trial Court of Makati? Respondent
submits it is not malpractice.
Significantly, petitioner’s admission was done not thru his counsel but by
Dr. Martin himself under oath. Such verified admission constitutes an
affidavit, and, therefore, receivable in evidence against him. Petitioner
became bound by his admission. For Cecilia to avail herself of her
husband’s admission and use the same in her action for legal separation
cannot be treated as malpractice.
_______________
3 1973 CONST., Art. IV, §4(1); 1987 CONST., Art. III, §3(1).
704
Petition denied.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168a75fd525948a3294003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/6
2/1/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 253
_______________
4 Id.
5 1973 CONST., ART. IV, §4(2); 1987 CONST., Art. III, §3(2).
6 Rule 130, §22.
7 Rule 130, §24.
705
assisted by counsel nor his waiver thereto put into writing. (People
vs. De Lara, 236 SCRA 291 [1994])
——o0o——
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168a75fd525948a3294003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/6