You are on page 1of 1

CARIBBEAN E XAM I NAT I O N S COUNCIL

FRM/EDPD/615
CARIBBEAN SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE®
EXAMINATION
MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT

English A
Name of Centre: ______________________________________________________ Territory: _______________________________________________ Centre Code: ____________________

Name of Teacher: _____________________________________________________ Year of Examination: _____________

ly
s
A. ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS C. COMPLIANCE WITH SYLLABUS GUIDELINES ay

nt

y
ue

rel
lw

eq
NA
A

Ra
Fr
Number of assignments requested
1. Assignment details submitted
Number of assignments received
2. Assignments were of appropriate length
Yes No 3. Assignments adhered to required format

ly
Sampling guidelines adhered to 4. Mark Schemes conformed to syllabus guidelines

nt
s

ue
ay

ly
re
eq
lw
5. Assignments marked as specified in syllabus

Ra
Fr
A
Candidates’ names and registration numbers

ly
D. QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK ON CANDIDATES’ SUBMISSIONS s ly
ay

nt
accurately recorded re

ue
lw Ra

eq
Candidates have: A

Fr
Marks on candidates’ assignments consistent
with marks on moderation form 1 Demonstrated adequate knowledge of the content and objectives assessed
2. Demonstrated competence in the skills assessed
Marks clearly indicated for components/criteria 3. Demonstrated understanding of the issues related to the topics chosen
4. Provided a written report and reflection that were coherent and relevant
5. Showed sufficient evidence of their own work in the portfolio

ly The overall quality of candidates’ submissions was:


B. APPROPRIATENESS OF TASKS s ent
ay qu Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
ly

lw e
re

A Fr
Ra

Topic(s) chosen was/were relevant to the syllabus Candidates’ performance could have been improved by:
Topic(s) chosen was/were appropriate for the __________________________________________________________________________________________
CSEC level __________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments

______________________________________________________________ E. QUALITY OF TEACHER’S MARKING


______________________________________________________________ The teacher’s marking of the sample was:
______________________________________________________________ Acceptable Severe Lenient Inconsistent

January 2018

You might also like