Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 103–105 x Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Progress in Prevention
103
4
TABLE 1 Risk-Enhancing Factors for Clinician-Patient Risk Discussion
• Family history of premature ASCVD (male, age < 55 y; female, age < 65 y)
• Primary hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C, 160–189 mg/dL [4.1–4.8 mmol/L); non–HDL-C, 190–219 mg/dL [4.9–5.6 mmol/L])
• Metabolic syndrome (Presence of 3 of the following: increased waist circumference, elevated triglycerides [>175 mg/dL], elevated blood
pressure, elevated glucose, and low HDL-C [<40 mg/dL in men; <50 mg/dL in women])
• Chronic kidney disease (eGFR, 15–59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with or without albuminuria; not treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation)
• Chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, or human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
• History of premature menopause and history of pregnancy-associated conditions that increase later ASCVD risk such as preeclampsia
• High-risk race/ethnicities (eg, South Asian ancestry)
• Lipid/biomarkers: associated with increased ASCVD risk
• Persistently elevated triglycerides, ≥175 mg/dL
• In selected individuals, if measured:
• Elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥ 2.0 mg/L
• Elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL or ≥125 nmol/L
• Elevated apoB ≥ 130 mg/dL
• ABI < 0.9
Abbreviations: ABI, ankle-brachial index; apoB, apolipoprotein B; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate;
HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and Lp(a), lipoprotein (a).
select individuals at a borderline risk, and 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% have had limited response or intol-
who may be reluctant to initiate or or greater, and (4) severe hypercho- erance to statins.
reinstitute statin therapy. If the CAC lesterolemia (LDL-C 190 mg/dL). Use of patient education mate-
score is zero in these individuals and Although magnitude of reduction will rials and decision support tools to
there are no higher risk conditions, vary by individual, high-intensity statin promote understanding of ASCVD
statin therapy can be deferred, whereas therapy typically lowers LDL-C levels risk as well as potential risk reduc-
a CAC score of 100 or greater favors by 50% or greater and moderate- tion from lipid-lowering therapy can
statin initiation. intensity therapy by 30% to 49%. aid in the clinician-patient risk dis-
Consistent with the 2013 guide- For secondary prevention, the guide- cussion. Table 2 provides a variety
line, statins remain the first-line lipid- line introduces a threshold of LDL-C of resources to support cholesterol
lowering agents for ASCVD risk of 70 mg/dL or greater for consider- management efforts, including risk
reduction. The new guideline is con- ation of newer, nonstatin cholesterol- discussion. Discussion of potential
sistent in recommending moderate- or lowering agents, including ezetimibe out-of-pocket cost of therapy to the
high-intensity statin therapy for the and PCSK9 inhibitors. Nonstatin patient is essential because of the di-
following groups: (1) clinical ASCVD, cholesterol-lowering agents will be rect influence on an individual's ability
(2) diabetes mellitus with LDL-C of mainly limited to secondary preven- to adhere to the agreed-upon treat-
70 mg/dL or greater, (3) 40 to 75 years tion in individuals at a very high risk ment plan. A teach-back approach
old with LDL-C of 70 to 189 mg/dL of new ASCVD events and those who where an individual is encouraged to
verbalize what was heard (eg, per- a population-based sample. N Engl J 6. American Heart Association. Cholesterol
sonal ASCVD risk, available options, Med. 2014;370(15):1422–1431. tools and resources. 2018. http://www.
3. Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, heart.org/en/health-topics/cholesterol/
and risks/benefits) allows a clinician et al. Familial hypercholesterolemia: cholesterol-tools-and-resources. Accessed
to address any misunderstanding. screening, diagnosis and management December 1, 2018.
The new 2018 cholesterol guideline of pediatric and adult patients: clini- 7. Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Asso-
reflects the rapidly evolving science cal guidance from the National Lipid ciation. Heart Healthy Toolbox. 2018.
supporting ASCVD risk estimation Association Expert Panel on Familial http://pcna.net/clinical-tools/tools-for-
Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. healthcare-providers/heart-healthy-
and cholesterol management strategies 2011;5(3):133–140. toolbox. Accessed December 1, 2018.
across the life course. Implementation 4. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, 8. The FH Foundation. Diagnosis and
of the guideline to achieve reductions et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/ management. 2018. https://thefh
in CVD morbidity and mortality will AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ foundation.org/diagnosis-management.
require effective clinician-patient dis- ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Accessed December 1, 2018.
Management of Blood Cholesterol: 9. Million Hearts. Cholesterol management.
cussion and shared decision making. a report of the American College of 2018. https://millionhearts.hhs.gov/tools-
REFERENCES Cardiology/American Heart Association protocols/tools/cholesterol-management.
1. Nguyen D, Kit B, Carroll M. Abnormal Task Force on clinical practice guide- html. Accessed December 1, 2018.
cholesterol among children and adoles- lines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. 10. Centers for Disease Control and
cents in the United States, 2011–2014. 5. American College of Cardiology. Prevention. Cholesterol communica-
NCHS Data Brief. 2015;228:1–8. ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus. 2018. tions kit. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/
2. Pencina MJ, Navar-Boggan AM, http://tools.acc.org/ASCVD-Risk- cholesterol/communications-kit.htm.
D'Agostino RB Sr., et al. Applica- Estimator-Plus/#!/calculate/estimate/. Updated September 24, 2018. Accessed
tion of new cholesterol guidelines to Accessed December 1, 2018. December 1, 2018.