Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
in,,.n, ffx!:l,;; i:'#' iljl['""G".,0
O FFIC E OFTH E PROV I NC I A L AG RA R I A N N N T'O-NTI A DJ U D I CATOR
PROVINCE OF CAPIZ
2tul Floor, Fuentes Bltlg., Fuentes Subtliyision, Roxas Ciy,
Region V I
SECOND INDORSEMENT
18 October 2017
An order dated November 21, 2012 ot the PARAD Jose Maria C. Combatir
denied the Notice of Appeal filed by Jose De La Cruz and accordingly, the
plaintifPs motion for the issuance of writ of execution was granted.
As a matter of fact, a Certification on the 21d day of January, 2013 has been
issued by Marlon A. Ambrosio, DARAB Provincial Sheriff of Capiz of the tum-over
of the actual possession to the plaintiff.
Attached are:
tu
Provin#l
LVACI
ranan
N NUS
Adjudicator
(
(
t
Copy furnished:
3. file coPY 9r
IJ? loeq,l:l B
lod""isd.+ EaM
E aM. lo'e,,
I tr]pr.
El e*. I
I FEighr
TELNO
t
o
(,
{, moniss
&
U
B fblDGl
g NEth or Goods (spedt rd
fl c"*
Io ! o*'--r !o'"'s"
Dsd r&d Er,s E po.,"r,
Eot "
TOTAL (PHP)
-
l-)epirrtment of Agrarian Reform
r#,,st Arliudication Board (DARAB)
NOf'ICE
'l'tl Atty. Fredicind<) A Talat)uoorl I l er csitaB. Becares rep. by AIF,
J & C Santos Bldg N'lcKinlev l)orrrrie S. Cordovero, Phase 2,
St. Roxas City .\lurlntan St. Gran trlains Sub{. ,J,
terLr. llollo Citl .;..i.-]r: i,r
..\-.,d
.-.,:" .t
c
:
.: I
F.}L
ulE 6-'
t i,t
?. ,r' [E B )'i# a
r-,.
Glttr.t:-l tN(lS
Per Order of the Adjudicator grarttirrg the Appeal, and upon receipt by this Office
of the complete case records of Region:rl ( ase No. 0{69(Capiz-201.1) now docketed on
appeal as DARAB Case No. 18E20 entitled "'l'erecita B. Becares rep. by her AIF,
Donnie S. Cordovero vs. Jose Dela (fruz", Apprllees are hereby required to file their
Appellee's Memorandunr within tiftecu ( l5) days fi'om receipt hereof, to the Office of
the Seoretariat, DAR Adjudication Board, .\nner Bldg, Department of Agrarian Reforrir
Clentral Olllce Compound, Elliptical Road Dilinran. Quezon City, furnishing a copy
thcreolto the appellant/s and rhe latter'r ct;irnsel. pursuanl to Sec.:l Rute XI\r ofthe 2009
D.\ RAB Rules of Procedure.
Failure to comply w.ith the abore reiluirement or upon the expiration ofthe period
for its liling shall be deemed a waiver ro surbmit tlre same and the Board shall proceed to
render judgment thereon based on the rccorils ofthe case
Concurred hy
:ssaulrl
ul
NOllVllllUl)
U.l0 AI.)
.).ro JcurAotd
/O8 N()lIVllOrlf0Y
6 uar.rc.riy.1o 1u;ru1.lerJq1
fiIq6 :rgt.1o :rr1qnde1
t.
\-. v
-f-
t imposed
nolice of
by the
olreody become finol qnd execuiory. The proyer for the issuonce of the writ
execution is in order os it becomes mondotory or minisieriol duty of this Office
issue lhe some (For Eostern SuretY &thsJlonce Co.. lnc. vs. Vdo. Del
I
so
Provir\ci.d/ Re{orruAdjudler
,1
i'r
t ED TRUE COPY
*LO0{
,:q(0F11
A o 9
ll'iE
fr
o. o Nofice ot Appeol together with the Appellont's
Filing
Memorondum: with lhe Adjudicotor who rendered the
decrsbn or finol order oppeoled from;
Even gronting thol defendonl hos nol received lhe decision from Felicitos
Cordovero on Augusl 12, 2010, slill the Notice of Appeol is filed out of time. After
Defendont wos inlormed of the soid decision by the MARO on lhe first week of
April 2012, he immediotely checked ond confirmed lhe some with the DARAB
office. Defendont ond his ottorney-in-focl even checked lhe records fconlrory
to lheir loler ollegoiion in their Answer to the supplemenlol opposition thot they
ottempled to hove the decision pholocopied to no ovoil "becouse lhe records
ore misploced qnd could nowhere to be found"). At the very leost, defendqnt
hod notice of the decision on lhe lost working doy of the firsl week of April 2012
which is April 6, 2012, giving him until Aprit 23, 2ot2 to file his oppeol considering
thol the supposed lost doy of the fifleen (.l5) doy reglementory period is April 21,
2012 which folls on soiurdoy ond the next working doy is Mondoy, Apnl 23,2012.
The Notice of Appeol filed on April 30, 2Ol2 wos seven (7) doys lole.
l. Whether or nol lhe Deelslon doted July 28, 2O1O wos duly served
lhe defendqnt ond,
Records reveol thot lhe Decision doted July 28, 2010 wos senl t
defendont Jose Delo Cruz through registered moil to his oddress ol Brgy. S
Jose, Roxos City. As indicoted in the Regisiry Return Receipl, the soid decision
wos received by o certoin Felicitos Cordovero on August 12, 2010. ln her
offidovii execuled on October 1,2012, Felicitos Cordovero stoled thol she wos
oble to give to defendonl Jose Delo Cruz the leller, which she come lo know
loler on os fhe decision, of oround 4:@ o'clock in the oflernoon of the some
doy when Jose Delo Cruz possed by her slore. According to her. lhe moil conier
would normqlly leove some letters 10 her slore becouse he know for o focl lhol
ihe oddressee hove to poss by her store every time he goes out of lhe
borongoy ond olso when he returns home.
However, defendont denied receiving lhe soid decision from Felicitos
Cordovero nor lhe lqtter informed him of the some. He cloims thot the offidovil
executed by Mrs. Felicitos Cordovero is highly disputoble becouse il wos signed
one week ofler the heoring on September 19, 2012 wherein, ofter being
queslioned by this Adjudicotor, she onswered thol she wos nol sure ond could
nol recoll whelher she give il or not to Jose Delo Cruz.
L
MA of{
"fl llf
A AMBposto
80ARD D.4iqB.rrF I r
0
/
records ore misploced ond nowhere to be found" by the DARAB stoff. T I
plointiff olso olleges thot since defendont ottended the initiol heoring beco
of the tirst subpoeno sent by this Office which wos received by Mrs. Felici 5
Cordovero, he olso generolizes ond concludes thot the decision sent d
.l2,20,l0
received by Mrs. Felicilos Cordovero on August wos olso received
the defendont when in foct he never received o copy of such decision
DARAB or Mrs. Felicilos Cordovero; thot the offidovit executed by Mrs. S
tz
t
{
/
,
olreody included in the Lond Voluotion Summory ond Former's Underloking on
{
August 1992 but wos deliberotely ond moliciously erosed by MARO Delio
Romuoldo during her term for reoson ihol ihere wos on olleged prolest; th
occording to Delio Romuoldo such comploinl orose from Edilberlo Binibini wh
olleged thot o portion of his lot wos included in the surveyed Lot No. 4071-H-l o
the 1989 DAR survey; thol to resolve the issue of boundories between Jose
Cruz ond Mr. Binibini, the DAR once ogoin conducled o survey on Februory 201
I ii I r , ond brought with them slone morkings to this effecl; thot the Lond Bonk of
Philippines ond the DAR exploined to lhe defendont thol occording to
lond poymenl wos olreody subsumed by the poyment of rentols lrom 1972-1994
thot Anlonio Delo Cruz hos been cullivoling the lond since 1953 olong with hi
son Jose Delo Cruz who is now lhe ocluol tenonl ond hos been religiousl
poying the renlols os slipuloled in lhe Agriculturol Leosehold Controct dot
Apnl 22, 1974; thdl'there is no deliberote refusol to poy the leose rentol os
defendonl hos been religiously poying the owner for more thon twenty (20)
yeors olreody
I
Defendont proys for the revenol of the decision ond for the reinsloiement
of the defendont os tenont beneficiory of lhe mentioned lot under PD 27. Hq
likewise proys lhol the DAR officiols be summoned ond lo bring documenls w irh
them lo shed light ond provide more informotion on the olleged comploinl
Mr. Binibini.
I
ln o heorihg on Sepiember 21 ,2012, Atty. Disluro monifested thot t
plointiff died on June 16, 201I ond thot he is survived by his wife leresito rc(
ond thqt he is intending lo file o moiion for substitulion of the porty-plointiff o
o supplementol opposition to the opposilion to defendonl's notice of op
within tive doys. ln the inlerest of justice soid molions were gronted d i
defendonl wos likewise given the some period of time from receipl lo file ts
commenl thereto.
TRUE.COPY 3
c
M ,/, N A. AMBROSIO
CLERKOF ItIE BOARD DAR{B.C4FIZ
--_-._._----
;il
I
/
,""
residing since ol Brgy. Son Jose, Roxos City uniil lhe present iime; thol ,rnr. fl
Jose is one (l) kilometer more or less distonce from DARAB, Roxos City; thot
defendont, thru his ottorney-in-foct, hos olleged thot he never received the
decision doted July 28, 20120; thot the soid ollegotion is withoul meril in fqct,
ond controry to low ond jurisprudence, os it is impossible for the defendqht
I
never to receive the soid decision considering lhot Brgy. Son Jose is one (l)
kilometer more or less from the Adjudicotion Boord, Roxos City; Thot, with th
finolity of the decision, on order wri'l 6f execution of the decision on July 28,
be issued for its execution; thot defendonl moy oppeol ihe decision of
Provinciol Adjudicotor on ony of the following grounds: o.) thot there is grove.
obuse of discretion on the port of the Provinciol Adludicotor; b.) thot the order
or decision is obloined through froud or coercion. or groft ond conuplion; c.)
lhot enors in the findings of foct or conclusion of low were committed which, if
not conected, woukj couse grove ond ineporoble domoge or injury to lhe
oppellont; ond. d.) the oppeol moy be token from on order or decision of lhe
Provinciol Adjudicotor to the BOARD wilhin ihe period of frfteen (15) doys from
receipl of the decision oppeoled, ond serving o copy to the opposite or
odverse porty. Plointiff prqys thot lhe notice of oppeol be sel oside, on Order of
Fnolity of the decision be issued; o wril of execulion be issued ond for the DAR
Sheriff to enforce the some ogoinst defendont ond other persons octing in his
beholf ond residing in the subject lond.
On June 2O.,2012.defendont. thru his Attorney-ln-Foct Edgordo Edwin A.
Segoyo. filed on l'Appeolont Memorondum" doted June 13. 2012 which
substontiolly stoies thot defendont never received the soid decision; thot he
found out thot o, cerloin Felicitos Cordovero of Brgy. Son Jose. Roxos City
received the some; thot he wos never informed by nor received o copy the soid
decision from Felicitos Cordovero.
Defendonl further sloied lhot he wos o residenl of Brgy. Son Jose from
birth, o former Borongoy Kogowod ond presenlly o Borongoy Treosurer ond the
cunenl BARC choirmon; thol ploinliff Froncisco Becores, jr. while he is one of lhe
living heirs of the lote Esler cordovero, from the storl of lhe courl proceedings,
did nol presenl ony documents confirming ond esloblishing his penonolity for
ond in beholf of lhe living heirs of lhe lote Ester cordovero; lhot he is not the
estoblished odministrotor for he hos no outhorizolion nor o holder of o speciol
Power of Attorney to represent oll the living heirs of Ester Cordovero; thot
while
indeed there wos on Agniculturol leosehold conlrocl execuled on Apdl 22, 1971
between the lote Ester cordovero ond Anlonio Delo cruz covering Lot No. 4071-
H-l conloining on oreo of 1.25 hectores, more or less, lhere is no kulh to the
siqlement of the plointiff lhol Antonio Delo cruz wos olreody deod but is
v ery
much olive ond slill lives of Brgy. Son Jose, Roxos Ci ty ond is now 102 yeors
old;
thot on opproved survey plon doted December 12, 1989 wos issued by
the
Deporlment of Agrorion Reform (DAR) showing ond indicoling omong
olhers
lhe lol pre y'ond legolly possessed, developed ond tilled by Antonio Delo
Cruz reo of 1.9369 hectores; ihol defendonl's nome wos
$EftJIF UE,GOPY
1
.1 2
r::
MAI?
.ERXOF
f{ A, AMBROSIO
h E BOAND D/IRAB.CAP':
r
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARIAAENT Of AGRARIAN REFORil
Odfufuann fioaU
?rolinre/ of Co+t y
z/f fuaayBW,
Fue;tey Svn>d,, Roxa* C4Cy
-ve(ttk -
For : Elect me nt and, D am4e,y
JOSE DETA CRUZ,
Oe*nd,urtt
X
ORDER
For resolutlon is the "Notice of Appeol" doled April 25. 2012, filed b
Edgordo Edwin A. Segoyo, the ottorney-in{oct of defendont Jose Delo Cruz, o
April 30. 2012.
An order doted Moy I , 2012 wos issued giving ploinliff fifleen (I 5) doys
file o commenl/opposition lo the soid "Notice of Appeol".
rendered on July 28, 2Ol0 ond wos duly received on Augusf 12, 2012 by A
.De donl Jose Delo Cruz hos been octuolly ond continu
CERTIFJ UE GOPY I
f,
MAPL N A. AMBROSIO
cLgnK0 E BOARO DTFAB.CAFIZ r
of ABr arian Retor$
DeP:rrt ment Boa rd (D ARAT
on
Ad I u dicati
."#k,
NOTICE
'I tl
{n:Hl,":mdil'
( r1)-
t'silvs$:l'llTrJ taro, llollo i'
..:.,, I
t/ j
,i- { L\. - ill
i", .,' r'
li.-
--i"j
,
2
It B I I ttttu
I.,{
GREL,TINGS
Per Order olthe Adjudicator granting the Appeal, and upon receipt by this Office
of the complete case records of Regional (lase No. 0,,t69(Capiz-201.1) now docketed on
appeal as DARAB Case No. 18820 entitled "'l'erecita B. Becares rep. by her AIF,
Donnie S, Cordovero vs. Jose Dela Crrrz", Appellees are hereby required to file their
Appellee's lVlenrorandum within lifteen ( l5) days from receipt hereof, to the Offrce ol
the Secretariat, DAR Adjudication Board, Anner Bldg., Department of Agrarian Refbrm
Central Offtce Compound, Elliptical Road. Diliman, Quezon City, furnishing a copv
thereofto the appellant/s and the latrer's counsel, pursrrant to Sec.4 Rule XIV ofthe 2009
DARAB Rules of Procedure.
Failure to comply with the above requirement or upon the expiration ofthe period
lor its filing shall be deemed a waiver 1o submit the same ard the Board shall proceed to
render judgment thereon based on the records of the case.
Concurled by t
tTT'\',. tto NDC YSAY
xecu trt-e
DAkAts Semtm
tt:
P.111, 'lD .[u/ia: I u d S. lluestn
D,{l<Ats, Ojice ol rhe PAlL,ll)
21 l;, l'irtnte.s BLlg., l'wntes .fubdii.siat,
l\uus Lily