Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DER-NSW Evaluation
Report presented by
University of Wollongong
September 10 2010
Mr Charles Carceller’s research area focuses on social capital and technology use. He is a research
assistant at the University of Wollongong working on the DER-NSW evaluation.
Max Smith, Senior Manager Student Engagement and Program Evaluation (SEPE)
This evaluation was commissioned by the Digital Education Revolution-NSW Program of the NSW Department
of Education and Training. The project is overseen by an Evaluation Advisory Group.
This document presents base line data gathered prior to the issue of laptops to year 9 2010.
Stage 2 of this evaluation will take place in Terms 3 and 4 2010 consisting of case studies and follow up
student and teacher surveys.
© State of New South Wales through the NSW Department of Education and Training, DER-NSW, 2010
The DER-NSW program provides an opportunity to evaluate the impact of laptops on teaching
and learning in a large sample of students and teachers. The three primary research questions
explored in this evaluation are:
The project employs an evaluation approach focusing on survey methodology and qualitative
evidence. The basic design of the evaluation consists of three data collection phases in each
year. Data collected in 2010 is intended to establish a baseline of student and teachers’ ICT use,
knowledge and perceptions. Phase 1 2010 surveys the entire Year 9 student population across
the state, as well as all secondary school teachers. Phase 2 2010 includes four school case
studies across NSW. Phase 3 2010 is a second survey of the Year 9 student population and all
secondary school teachers.
The data presented in the following report includes results from the Phase 1 data collection in
2010. Responses suggest that teachers were well acquainted with quality teaching methods and
they felt they were able provide students with a variety of ways to demonstrate understanding,
and they were able to deliver lessons using a range of approaches. Baseline results suggested
that teachers generally do not feel confident using laptops in the classroom. At the same time,
teachers’ responses indicate they believe that becoming good at using technology is a matter of
gaining experience using the tools over time and that it is important for students to work with
computers. The evaluation will examine how, and if: teachers are gaining confident using
laptops in their teaching; if the use of laptops impacts on classroom practices; and their method
of communication with other teachers, students and parents.
Initial results suggest that students are more likely to engage in basic communication and
information gathering activities when using ICT, rather than creation activities in their personal
ICT use and in the classroom. This said, students indicated positive beliefs about the importance
of ICT in their learning. They felt technology was useful in most of their subject areas, but less so
in Mathematics. The evaluation will closely examine what types of tasks students are asked to
complete in the classroom and if these change over time. Further, relationships between laptop
The report is structured on the following sections: Demographics, School culture, Access to ICT,
Knowledge & use of ICT, Learning & teaching with ICT, Bases of achievement in subject areas
and Intentions (beyond school). Each of the sections presents student and teacher responses;
results are then followed by a summary of findings. The presentation of results is then reviewed
in relation to the three research questions.
1 Introduction
The Digital Education Revolution NSW (DER-NSW) one-to-one laptop program is part of the
Australian Commonwealth Government Digital Education Revolution initiative. The Digital
Education Revolution – NSW is funded through the National Secondary School Computer Fund
and aims to provide a highly specialised wireless laptop to all students in years 9 to 12 by 2012.
Research has suggested that one-to-one computing programs increase students’ motivation and
engagement in learning, as well as support students to develop the capacity to see connections
with what they are learning and the wider world.
The NSW Department of Education and Training (NSW DET) has initiated a formal evaluation of
the educational impact of the Digital Education Revolution – NSW. The project is being
conducted as a collaboration between NSW DET and the University of Wollongong (UoW). It is
intended that the evaluation will take place over 3 years.
The DER-NSW program provides an opportunity to evaluate the impact of laptops on teaching
and learning in a large sample of students and teachers. Due to the size of the population, the
results have the potential to be generalisable. Findings from this evaluation will guide future
directions in the implementation of information and communication technologies into
education in NSW government schools. Findings from this evaluation will also be of great
interest to the wider field of educational research as one-to-one computing programs are
considered in other educational contexts. One focus of the evaluation will be the impact of the
one-to-one laptop program on students showing characteristics of low-engagement in learning.
Findings from this aspect of the evaluation will be of particular interest to schools in NSW in
light of the recently extended school-leaving age in NSW schools.
The first goal of the evaluation is to establish student and teacher baseline data establishing
their initial ICT access, knowledge and use. The second goal is to explore possible relationships
between the DER-NSW one to one laptop program and teachers’ pedagogical transformation;
student, teacher and community engagement and educational outcomes.
and outcomes:
There will be a sustained and meaningful change in the way teaching and learning are
delivered in Australian secondary schools …
Access to educational tools of the 21st century…providing stimulating and challenging
learning resources for students
The teacher workforce will be equipped … to effectively utilise ICT in the classroom (p.
6).
The funds have been allocated to secondary schools in consultation with the states and
territories, and in some states the use of funds have been at the discretion of the schools. New
South Wales, however has implemented a state-wide program that will provide every student in
years 9 to 12 in government schools with a wirelessly enabled specialist educational laptop
through their senior education. Economies of scale have been achieved through centralised
purchasing processes providing residual funds to support the program through state-wide
wireless network, employment of Technology Support Officers and professional learning and
curriculum support for teachers.
The Department of Education and Training Office of Schools has taken leadership of the
program to ensure that the focus remains on transforming teaching and learning in NSW
government schools. At this time the NSW Department of Education and Training is primarily
interested in understanding how the one-to-one laptop initiative will influence students’
DER-NSW, Baseline data report 3
engagement in learning, the transformation of teachers’ pedagogy and engagement with the
wider school community.
There has been a number of “laptop school” programs in other countries. A review of programs
in Canada, the United States, and Australia has shown the following findings (Learning Cultures
Consulting Inc., 2006, p. 8):
• Attainment of 21st century skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving, team work,
communications skills and ICT literacy);
• Increases in student motivation, engagement, interest, organization, and self-directed
learning;
• Transformation of teacher pedagogy;
• Increased parental and community involvement and improved home-school
communication.
While these findings have been consistent across several different initiatives, the success of
school change is often reliant on culture and context (Schoen & Teddlie, 2008). Therefore, it will
be important to develop an understanding of student, teacher and school community
experiences specific to the context of DER-NSW as a whole, as well as individual school
experiences in the initiative.
While many positive trends have been identified within one-to-one laptop programs, significant
limiting issues were also identified with implementation, specifically “lack of planning and/or
evaluation” (Learning Cultures Consulting Inc., 2006, p. 8). In an effort to ensure full realisation
of learning and teaching benefits, synchronous and careful evaluation of the DER-NSW laptop
program implementation is being undertaken.
2010 Teachers & Baseline Baseline End of Year 1 Baseline survey data
Students (Year 9) questionnaire case Questionnaire All Year 1 data
studies including case
studies
2011 Teachers, Start Year 2 Year 2 End of Year 2 Year 2 survey data
Students & Questionnaire Case Questionnaire Year 1& 2 data &
Parents (Year 10) studies comparisons
2012 Teachers, Start of Year 3 Final Case Final Year 3 survey data
Students & Questionnaire studies Questionnaire Year 1-3 data & final
Parents (Year 11) comparisons
This process will be repeated in 2011 and 2012 using the same cohort of students as they
progress through their schooling as well as their teachers and parents.
The three questionnaires were piloted a second time at four secondary schools in February
2010. StuA was piloted on 137 Year 9 students, StuB on 28 Year y students, and Teacher Survey
A (TrA) on 22 senior school teachers. The three questionnaires were then reviewed for
redundancy, language and response rates. The final questionnaires can be reviewed in
Appendices A-C.
Baseline student data were gathered through questionnaires StuA and StuB (see Appendices A
& B). Most students completed the questionnaires as part of their laptop orientation. The StuA
questionnaire addressed students’ existing access to ICT and knowledge of ICT, as well as their
beliefs about core subject areas (e.g. English, Maths, etc.). StuB gathered data about students’
initial understanding of ICT in learning. Students were randomly allocated by school to either
questionnaire StuA or StuB.
Baseline teacher data were gathered through questionnaire TrA (see Appendix C). Teachers
indicated whether or not they had taught Year 9 in 2009, if they were currently teaching year 9,
and if they were teaching Year 10. This data provides a picture of their exposure to the laptop
program. Teacher surveys focused on teachers’ beliefs about ICT integration in learning and
teaching, how their beliefs relate to their curriculum areas and their level of engagement with
students and the wider school community.
Data gathered provides a preliminary or base line view of students ‘and teachers’ experiences
with, and beliefs about, ICT in teaching and learning. The following sections present the baseline
data gathered through the questionnaires. Data presentation is based on the thematic structure
of the questionnaires. It is important to note, while the measures used to construct the
questionnaires have previously been used in NSW schools, comparisons to existing data are not
made at this time.
Summary
At the time of this data collection, 27,812 students had completed either StuA (n = 14,299) or
StuB (n = 13,513). The student population was representative of males and females. A high
percentage of students completing StuA spoke a language other than English at home (43.5%),
while only 17.7% of students completing StuB indicated speaking another language. This will be
investigated in the case studies and the second questionnaire deployment in Term 4 2010. Of
the 27,812 students who had completed the two questionnaires at the time of data collection,
1361 (4.9%) self-identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander origin. The size of this
sample has the potential to support valid conclusions to be drawn as to the impact of the one to
one laptop program on their educational outcomes.
TrA Q-6. How long have you been teaching at your current school?
Frequency Valid %
Summary
At the time of this data collection, 4,604 teachers had completed the survey. The population
showed a predictable distribution between males and females. All of the Key Learning Areas
(KLAs)s were appropriately represented. The number of teachers whose allocations included
Year 9 was consistent from 2009 to 2010. Years of teaching was skewed toward 21+ years
(37%). This is consistent with recent literature on the aging Australian workforce. Often people
DER-NSW, Baseline data report 11
assume that teachers’ take-up of technology integration in the classroom is related to age, that
older teachers are less likely to change their practice and integrate technology. While this trend
has been disproved by research, the evaluation will explore this cultural perception.
StuA Q-5d. ... I am given the chance to do work really interests me.
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-5e. … I have acquired skills that will be of use to me when I leave school.
Frequency Valid %
StuB Q-5e. … I have acquired skills that will be of use to me when I leave school.
Frequency Valid %
Your views
TrA Q-19a. The way that I communicate with students, other teachers, and/or parents has
changed with my participation in the laptop program.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19f. I have had the opportunity to participate in training where I learned to use effective
learning and teaching strategies.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19g. I feel that the school leaders (e.g. principal) support the DER-NSW one-to-one laptop
program.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19h. I feel that I have the necessary skills to use the laptops to my everyday teaching.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19i. I have had the opportunity to participate in training where I learned to use the
software on the laptops.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19k. I feel that the school has provided appropriate support structures to assist with
concerns or problems involving use of the laptops.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19l. I feel confident enough to take risks when planning how to use the laptops in my
teaching.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19o. I feel that I am able to ask other teachers for advice about effective learning and
teaching strategies when using the laptops.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19q. I feel confident that I can effectively use the laptop in my classes.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-19r. I have become more enthusiastic about teaching as I have participated in the laptop
program.
Frequency Valid %
Summary
Generally, teachers enjoyed coming to work (87.2% Agree or Strongly Agree) and 88.2% Agreed
or Strongly Agreed that they were respected in the school community. Teachers’ experiences in
the DER-NSW were mixed. For example, 60.1% of teachers did not feel their method of
communication had changed through participation in the DER-NSW (TrA Q-19a). The majority
(90%) of teachers felt the program was well supported by school leadership (TrA Q-19g), but
only 51.4% of respondents felt training opportunities about integrating the laptops were
DER-NSW, Baseline data report 21
accessible (TrA Q-19p). Nearly one-third (30.3%) of the teachers Disagreed or Strongly
Disagreed that they felt confident using the laptops in their teaching (TrA Q-19q). These themes
and others will be followed closely in the case studies and subsequent surveys. The possibility
of bias in teachers’ responses will be investigated in the case studies, particularly when teachers
are reporting on school leadership. The correlation of school leadership and program
effectiveness will also be investigated in future aspects of the evaluation.
StuA Q-8. Do you ever use a computer outside of school other than at home?
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-8. How often do you use a computer at school for any reason?
Frequency Valid Percent
Valid Never 2 .0
1-3 times a year 2 .0
Once a term 3 .1
1-3 times a month 8 .2
Once a week 20 .5
1-3 times a week 104 2.4
Once a day 231 5.3
Many times a day 3968 91.5
Total 4338 100.0
Missing 99.00 266
Total 4604
Valid Never 17 .4
1-3 times a year 6 .1
Once a term 3 .1
Once a month 8 .2
1-3 times a month 13 .3
Once a week 46 1.1
1-3 times a week 294 6.8
Once a day 1054 24.3
Many times a day 2891 66.7
Total 4332 100.0
Missing 99.00 272
Total 4604
Summary
StuA results show that most students already have access to a computer at home (95.4%) and it
is usually connected to the internet (91.9%). On StuA 28.8% of students indicated they use a
computer at school 1-3 times a week and 27.8% on StuB. StuA results showed 21.6% of students
using a computer “once a day” or “many times a day” in school, 31.7% on StuB. We would expect
to see significant increases in these numbers with use of the laptops. Teachers’ responses show
that 92.5% use computers “many times a day” in school. Out of school, 91% use a computer
outside of school “once a day” or “many times a day”.
StuA Q-15a. Write a first draft (e.g. writing in word rather than on paper first).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15b. Edit your written work (i.e. analysing writing, spell checking, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15f. Post comments to a website online (e.g. respond to blogs, news articles, etc).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15i. Research information on people, things, or ideas (e.g. Google, Wikipedia, etc).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15k. Create multi-media presentations (e.g. using sound, pictures, video, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15n. Download pictures (e.g. from a digital camera, mobile phone, etc).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15q. Enter data into a database or spreadsheet (e.g. putting numbers into Microsoft
Excel, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-15r. Use a spreadsheet to plot a graph (e.g. create a line graph in Microsoft Excel).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-16a. Write a first draft (e.g. writing in word rather than on paper first).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-16i. Research information on people, things, or ideas (e.g. Google, Wikipedia, etc).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-16n. Download pictures (e.g. from a digital camera, mobile phone, etc).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-16r. Use a spreadsheet to plot a graph (e.g. create a line graph in Microsoft Excel).
Frequency Valid %
StuA Q-16t. Create your own compute program (e.g. Logo, Basic, etc).
Frequency Valid %
Summary
Overall, students showed very positive engagement with technology and they felt it was
important for them to work with computers (StuA Q-14a, 85.8%, Agreed or Strongly agreed).
Further, 82.7% of students Agreed or Strongly agreed that working with computers was fun
(StuA Q-14b). Students generally showed higher use and more knowledge of using technology
for basic communication and research (e.g. I can do this very well by myself : StuA Q-15d Write,
send and receive emails, 88.9%; and StuA Q-15i Research information on people, things, or
ideas, 89.5%), rather than creation activities (e.g. I can do this very well by myself: StuA Q-15o
Create your own webpage, 33.2%; and StuA Q-15p Create a movie, 46.1%). Results show that
students were likely to have performed tasks relating to basic communication and research (e.g.
DER-NSW, Baseline data report 42
Never: StuA Q-16d, Write, send and receive emails, 11.1%; and StuA Q-16i, Research
information on people, things, or ideas, 4.8%) than content creation (e.g. Never: StuA Q-16o,
Create your own webpage, 44.1%; and StuA Q-16p. Create a movie, 35.8%). Future evaluation
will be able to demonstrate whether or not students are engaging in content creation tasks
more often and with the use of DER-NSW laptops.
TrA Q-11a. Research and develop lesson plans and curriculum design.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-11b. Develop instructional materials (e.g. using Word to create handouts, assessments,
etc.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-11d. Create and/or maintain website(s) as part of one or more of your classes.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-11f. Participate in online discussion forums and interact with other educators.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-11j. Use online simulation site use equipment that you do not otherwise have access to.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-13d. I think working with a computer should be a fun part of student learning.
Frequency Valid %
Summary
Teacher’s responses indicate frequent use of technology to develop instructional materials (e.g.
“Once at day” and “Many times a day”: TrA Q-11a, 55.3%; TrA Q-11b, 58.4%). They are much
less likely to use PowerPoint presentations daily or many times a day (TrA Q-11c, 15%) or
create and maintain a website (TrA Q-11d, 11.4%). Results also show that 25% of teachers have
never communicated with peers or students using email or forums, and only 15.6% of teachers
do this daily or many times a day (TrA Q-11e). The majority of teachers felt technology was
important for their work (TrA Q-13a , 95.6% Agree or Strongly Agreed) and that it was
important for students to work with computers (TrA Q-13b, 94.5% Agreed or Strongly Agreed);
slightly less indicated actually being interested in computers (TrA Q-13e , 64.5% Agreed or
Strongly Agreed). It is of interest that 30% of teachers indicated that they felt using computers
in their work was important even though they did not have a personal interest in using
computers. This trend suggests implications relating to teachers’ conceptions of work having a
stronger influence on their practice than personal interest. This will be further explored in the
case studies.
How important do you think it is to use computers and other technology tools in…
StuB Q-8a. The teacher talks to the class (e.g. history lecture, explaining Maths on the board,
etc.).
Frequency Valid %
StuB Q-8b. I work in groups with other students (e.g. on a problem set, on a project, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
How often are you asked to do the following activities in school using a computer?
StuB Q-18b. I am able to contribute when working with other students in a group.
Frequency Valid %
StuB Q-18c. The things I learn in school will prepare me for life as an adult.
Frequency Valid %
StuB Q-19d. I feel that I understand what we are doing in class better when I use a computer.
Frequency Valid %
In regard to quality teaching, students’ responses indicated that they were often engaging in
activities that would illicit deeper thinking and higher cognitive thought (quality teaching
strategies; StuB Q-17). Most students completing StuB Agreed or Strongly Agreed that they were
“encouraged to think about things in my own way” (StuB Q-18a, 85.7%).
In the course of a week, in what proportion of your lessons do you do the following?
TrA Q-14a. Provide a variety of ways for students to demonstrate their understandings.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-14e. Provide students with stimulating and challenging learning resources.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-14g. Deliver lessons that you have designed providing a range of approaches that
encourage your teaching or student learning.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-14h. Deliver lessons that you have found (e.g. online, another teacher, etc.) providing a
range of approaches that enhance your teaching or student learning.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15b. It is easier to access diverse teaching materials and resources when using a
computer.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15c. I can present topics in greater depth when using a computer in the classroom.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15d. I can create instructional materials that assist in meeting course outcomes at a
higher standard when using a computers.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15f. When designing lessons I consider whether the computers would enhance my
teaching or student learning.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15g. My lessons are more student-centred when I plan to use computers in my teaching.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-15h. I feel that my teaching has become student-centred as a result of using a computer.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16a. Write a first draft (e.g. writing in Word rather than on paper first).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16b. Edit their written work (e.g. revising writing, spell checking, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16f. Research information on people, things, or ideas (e.g. Google, Wikipedia, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16h. Enter data into a database or spreadsheet (e.g. putting numbers into Microsoft Excel,
Google Docs, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16l. Gather data or information about a real-life problem (e.g. climate change).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16n. Analyse data or graphs (e.g. bar charts or line graphs).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16p. Create a product that incorporates pictures or graphics found on the web (e.g. a
presentation).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16r. Work on tasks with one or more colleagues to solve a problem (e.g. working in a
group or pair.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-16t. Engage in self-assessment tasks (e.g. have students post responses to discussion
questions in a forum, online quizzes, etc.).
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-18a. I encourage students to think about things in their own way.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-18b. The things students learn in school will prepare them for life as an adult.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-18c. Students' work is more creative when they use computers.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-18f. I feel students understand what they are doing in class better when they use
computers.
Frequency Valid %
TrA Q-18g. The more we use computers in class, the more it seems students enjoy school.
Frequency Valid %
Summary
Teachers were generally positive about using computers in the classroom. Most teachers
Agreed or Strongly Agreed that computers made it easier to individualise curriculum (TrA Q-
15a, 91.9%), that they were able to diversify their curriculum in every lesson or at least half
over the course of a week (TrA Q-14g, 82.6%), and that they could present topics in greater
depth (TrA Q-15c, 73.3%). While 69.5% of teachers felt their lesson planning had become more
student-centred when they plan to use computers in their teaching (TrA Q-15g), only 48.2% of
teachers reported feeling their teaching had become more student-centred as a result of using
computers (TrA Q-15h).
Students’ conception of technology and bases of achievement in the subject (StuA #13 &
StuB #16)
How important are the following things for being good at Maths?
How important are the following things for being good at English?
How important are the following things for being good at Science?
Summary
Students were more likely to say “talent” was Very Important in the Visual Arts and Music than
in History, Geography, Science, or Mathematics (StuB Q-9-17). Teachers were most likely to say
learning “knowledge and skills” was Very Important (61%) for doing well in their curriculum
area, and only 15.1% felt “natural talent” was Very Important to do well in their curriculum area
(TrA Q-17). Teacher responses will be analysed further to determine in which curriculum areas
teachers felt talent or experience were important. In regard to being “good” at using technology
(TrA Q-12), 91.2% of teachers felt gaining experience or a “feel” for technology was Important
or Very Important to be good at using it. Student and teacher responses regarding the bases of
DER-NSW, Baseline data report 88
achievement in the subject areas will be examined in parallel with those understood in relation
to technology. This will help develop an understanding of how to match bases of achievement
from the different areas to make technology integration more effective.
3.7 Intentions
StuA Q-21. What plans do you have for further education after high school?
Frequency Valid %
Summary
Results show that most students intend at this stage in their schooling to complete high school
(StuA Q-20, 90.1%; StuB Q-20, 87.5%). A small percent of the students surveyed do not have
plans for continuing education (StuA Q-21, 7.2%; StuB Q-21, 8.8%).
Teachers seem to be well acquainted with methods of quality teaching, but it will be essential to
investigate how these strategies are used in the classroom with the laptops. The DER-NSW also
considers how laptops may “enhance teacher capability to design and deliver programs that
meet students’ needs.” Baseline results show that teachers already feel they are able to provide
students with a variety of ways to demonstrate understanding and deliver lessons using a range
of approaches. The evaluation will investigate how the use of laptops may impact upon the way
they deliver their lessons and if the range of strategies used changes.
Another DER-NSW goal is that “Students and teachers routinely collaborate, build and share
knowledge using digital technologies.” Results show that, at this time, teachers and students are
not engaging in creation activities, but more research and organising activities. Use of ICT for
creation activities will be closely examined through the case studies and subsequent surveys.
These will also explore how the program is supported by school leadership at the school level,
and what type of professional development opportunities are available for teachers.
Pedagogical change
DER-NSW goals identify that “teachers will devise student centric programs of learning that
address agreed curriculum standards and employ contemporary learning resources and
activities” and “students and teachers are able to innovate in their use of ICT to achieve learning
outcomes.” At the time of the survey, teachers felt their planning was more student-centred,
they did not necessarily feel it was a result of participation in the DER-NSW. Teachers’
perceptions of laptop impact on their practice will be closely followed throughout the case
studies. It is also hoped that students will increase engagement in creation activities, such as
podcasting, movie creation, multimedia presentations, and web pages. Further, it will be
Communication
Teachers have not been asked to indicate changes in the way they communicate with students,
peers, or parents at this time. This will be closely tracked through the case studies and
subsequent surveys.
School completion
Students were overwhelmingly positive about school completion and continuing education after
high school. Students’ intentions for completion and further education will be tracked
throughout the evaluation for changes and compared to retention rates. Most likely, it will not
5 Conclusion
It is important to note that the findings presented in this report are intended to establish a
baseline understanding of student and teachers use and perception of ICT, specifically laptops,
in NSW schools. This evaluation will continue to examine student and teacher participation in
the DER-NSW through to the end of 2012.
The evaluation team and DET NSW would like to thank all of the individuals and schools that
have participated in the first phase of the evaluation. Participation from those involved in the
DER-NSW will allow us to identify the value of the program in terms of its impact on teaching
and learning thereby ensuring it is viewed as more than just a technology roll out.