HASIL

A. Karakteristik Responden
1) Umur

Statistics

umur
N Valid 78
Missing 0

usia

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 26-35 Tahun 28 35.9 35.9 35.9

36-45 Tahun 50 64.1 64.1 100.0

Total 78 100.0 100.0

2) Pendidikan

Statistics

pendidikan
N Valid 78
Missing 0
 pendidikan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 15 19.2 19.2 19.2
SMP 17 21.8 21.8 41.0
SMA 40 51.3 51.3 92.3
Perguruan Tinggi 6 7.7 7.7 100.0
Total 78 100.0 100.0

3) Pekerjaan
Statistics

pekerjaan

N Valid 78

Missing 0

pekerjaan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Buruh 15 19.2 19.2 19.2
petani 11 14.1 14.1 33.3
PNS 6 7.7 7.7 41.0
Swasta 32 41.0 41.0 82.1
IRT 14 17.9 17.9 100.0
Total 78 100.0 100.0
B. Analisa Univariat
1) Keluhan Nyeri Low Back Pain (LBP)
Statistics

NyeriLBP
N Valid 78
Missing 0

NyeriLBP

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Nyeri Ringan 33 42.3 42.3 42.3

Nyeri Sedang 45 57.7 57.7 100.0

Total 78 100.0 100.0

2) Masa Kerja

Statistics

JenKelamin
N Valid 78
Missing 0
 Masakerja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Baru 24 30.8 30.8 30.8

Lama 54 69.2 69.2 100.0

Total 78 100.0 100.0

3) Sikap Kerja
Statistics

sikapkerja

N Valid 78

Missing 0

sikapkerja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid resiko rendah 32 41.0 41.0 41.0

resiko rendah 46 59.0 59.0 100.0

Total 78 100.0 100.0

4) Jenis Kelamin
Statistics

jeniskelamin

N Valid 78

Missing 0

jeniskelamin

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid laki-laki 31 39.7 39.7 39.7

perempuan 47 60.3 60.3 100.0

Total 78 100.0 100.0

C. Analisa Bivariat
1) Hubungan Masa Kerja dengan Keluhan Nyeri Low Back Pain

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

JenKelamin * NyeriLBP 78 100.0% 0 .0% 78 100.0%

Masakerja * LBP Crosstabulation

LBP

nyeri ringan nyeri sedang Total

Masakerja Baru Count 15 9 24
Expected Count 10.2 13.8 24.0
% within Massakerja 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
Lama Count 18 36 54
Expected Count 22.8 31.2 54.0
% within Massakerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Total Count 33 45 78
Expected Count 33.0 45.0 78.0
% within Massakerja 42.3% 57.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.791a 1 .016

Continuity Correctionb 4.658 1 .031

Likelihood Ratio 5.779 1 .016

Fisher's Exact Test .025 .016

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.717 1 .017

N of Valid Casesb 78

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,15.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

 Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Massakerja (Lama / Baru) .300 .110 .817

For cohort LBP = nyeri ringan .533 .327 .869

For cohort LBP = nyeri sedang 1.778 1.026 3.081

N of Valid Cases 78

2) Hubungan Sikap Kerja dengan Keluhan Nyeri Low Back Pain

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

SikapKerja * NyeriLBP 78 100.0% 0 .0% 78 100.0%

sikapkerja * LBP Crosstabulation

LBP

nyeri ringan nyeri sedang Total

sikapkerja resiko rendah Count 19 13 32

Expected Count 13.5 18.5 32.0

% within sikapkerja 59.4% 40.6% 100.0%

resiko tinggi Count 14 32 46

Expected Count 19.5 26.5 46.0

% within sikapkerja 30.4% 69.6% 100.0%

Total Count 33 45 78

Expected Count 33.0 45.0 78.0

% within sikapkerja 42.3% 57.7% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.476a 1 .011

Continuity Correctionb 5.344 1 .021

Likelihood Ratio 6.513 1 .011

Fisher's Exact Test .019 .010

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.393 1 .011

N of Valid Casesb 78

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,54.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for sikapkerja (resiko tinggi /
.299 .116 .770
resiko rendah)
For cohort LBP = nyeri ringan .513 .304 .864
For cohort LBP = nyeri sedang 1.712 1.081 2.714
N of Valid Cases 78

3) Hubungan Jenis Kelamin dengan Keluhan Nyeri Low Back Pain

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

MasaKerja * NyeriLBP 78 100.0% 0 .0% 78 100.0%

 jeniskelamin * LBP Crosstabulation

LBP

nyeri ringan nyeri sedang Total

jeniskelamin laki-laki Count 19 12 31

Expected Count 13.1 17.9 31.0

% within jeniskelamin 61.3% 38.7% 100.0%

perempuan Count 14 33 47

Expected Count 19.9 27.1 47.0

% within jeniskelamin 29.8% 70.2% 100.0%

Total Count 33 45 78

Expected Count 33.0 45.0 78.0

% within jeniskelamin 42.3% 57.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.595a 1 .006

Continuity Correctionb 6.359 1 .012

Likelihood Ratio 7.646 1 .006

Fisher's Exact Test .010 .006

Linear-by-Linear Association 7.498 1 .006

N of Valid Casesb 78

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,12.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for jeniskelamin (laki-laki /

3.732 1.435 9.704
perempuan)

For cohort LBP = nyeri ringan 2.058 1.223 3.463

For cohort LBP = nyeri sedang .551 .341 .891

N of Valid Cases 78