Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 Systematics of Manufacturing
Technologies
Orientated on the geometry only, manufacturing technology in general is divided
into three fundamental clusters [Burns, 93, AMT, 14]:1
1. subtractive manufacturing technology,
2. formative manufacturing technology, and
3. additive manufacturing technology.
With subtractive manufacturing technology, the desired geometry is obtained by
the defined removal of material, for example, by milling or turning.
Formative manufacturing means to alter the geometry in a defined way by apply-
ing external forces or heat, for example, by bending, forging, or casting. Formative
manufacturing does not change the volume of the part.
Additive manufacturing creates the desired shape by adding material, preferably
by staggering contoured layers on top of each other. Therefore it is also called layer
(or layered) technology.
The principle of layer technology is based on the fact that any object, at least theo-
retically, can be sliced into layers and rebuilt using these layers, regardless of the
complexity of its geometry.
In Germany, manufacturing technology is divided into six main categories, and each of them is subdivided
1
Figure 1.1 Principle of layer technology, example: sculpture puzzle
(Source: HASBRO/MB Puzzle)
Generic terms and brand names have to be distinguished from each other. If they
are mixed, which happens quite often, this frequently leads to confusion. As brand
names are important in practice, they are addressed, explained, and linked to the
generic terms in Chapter 3, where the AM machines are presented.
Additive manufacturing is the generic term for all manufacturing technologies that
automatically produce parts by physically making and joining volume elements,
commonly called voxels. The volume elements are generally layers of even thick-
ness.
Additive manufacturing is standardized in the US (ASTM F2792) and in Germany
(VDI 3405), and is commonly used worldwide.
As alternative terms, additive manufacturing (technology) and additive layer
manufacturing (ALM) have minor acceptance.
3D printing is about to replace all other names, including additive manufacturing,
and to become the generally accepted generic term for layer technology in the near
future. This is mainly because it is very easy to understand. Everyone who can
operate a text editor (a word processor) and a 2D office printer easily understands
that he or she will be able to print a 3D object using a 3D design program (a part
processor) and a 3D printing machine, regardless of how it works.
NOTE: Additive manufacturing and 3D printing are used as equal generic terms in
this book. While in Chapter 1 this is expressed by always writing additive manu-
facturing /3D printing (or AM/3DP). In the following chapters only additive manu-
facturing or AM is used in order to shorten the text volume.
Beginners should realize that 3D Printing is also the brand name of a family of
powder binder processes (see Section 3.6), originally developed by MIT and licensed
to Z-Corporation (now 3D Systems), Voxeljet, and others.
The parts can be built in any imaginable orientation. There is no need for clamp-
ing, thus eliminating the clamping problem of subtractive manufacturing tech-
nologies. Nevertheless, some processes need support structures, and the orienta-
tion of the part influences the parts’ properties.
Today, all AM processes can be run using the same so-called STL (or AMF) data
structure, thus eliminating data exchange problems with preprocessors as used
in subtractive manufacturing.
Additive manufacturing/3D printing therefore ensures the direct conversion of the
3D CAD data (the virtual product model) into a physical or real part.
As scaling can be done simply in the CAD file, parts of different sizes and made
from different materials can be obtained from the same data set. As an example,
the towers of a chess set shown in Fig. 1.2 are based on the same data set but made
with different AM machines and from different materials. The range of materials
includes foundry sand, acrylic resin, starch powder, metals, and epoxy resin.
Figure 1.2 Additive manufacturing. Scaled towers of a chess set, based on the same data set
but made with different AM machines and from different materials.
Small towers, from left to right: PMMA (powder-binder process, Voxeljet), metal (laser sintering,
EOS), acrylate, transparent (stereolithography, Envisiontec; height approx. 3 cm).
Big towers, from left to right: foundry sand (powder-binder process, Voxeljet), starch powder
(powder-binder process, 3D Systems; height approx. 20 cm) (Source: machine manufacturers)
One of the biggest AM parts of all is the tower shown in Fig. 1.3 with a height of
approximately 2.5 m, which is higher than the general manager of the Voxeljet
Company, Mr. I. Ederer.
1.2 Systematics of Layer Technology 5
Figure 1.3 Chess tower made from foundry sand, height approx. 2.5 m, powder-binder
process (Source: Voxeljet)
Figure 1.4 Tower made from metal, height approx. 5 mm, micro laser sintering
(Source: EOS/3D Micromac)
Figure 1.5
Internal details of the rear right tower on Fig. 1.2
(Source: 3D Systems)
Technology
Additive Manufacturing
3D Printing
Prototyping Manufacturing of
- Concept Models
Rapid Prototyping
- Functional Prototypes
Rapid Manufacturing of
Application
Manufacturing of
Rapid Manufacturing
final parts
1.3.1 Rapid Prototyping
Non-Additive
Additive Processes Processes
Technology
Additive Manufacturing
3D Printing
Solid Imaging
Prototyping
Prototype
Tooling
Tooling
Rapid
Indirect Tooling
Manufacturing
Direct Tooling
Rapid Manufacturing
Indirect
Direct Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Figure 1.7 Basic structure of the AM/3D printing technology: application levels rapid proto-
typing, rapid manufacturing, and rapid tooling and its subcategories
A sample of each category is displayed in Fig. 1.8. The scaled data control model of
a convertible roof system (made from polyamide by laser sintering) can be re-
garded as a typical concept model. The air-outlet nozzle of a passenger car (made
by laser stereolithography from epoxy resin) is a functional prototype that sup-
ports the testing of the car’s climate control.
Figure 1.8 Rapid prototyping: concept model or solid image (left), laser sintering (Source: CP
GmbH); functional prototype (right), laser stereolithography (Source: 3D Systems)
1.3.2 Rapid Manufacturing
Rapid manufacturing (RM) names the application of the AM/3D printing technol-
ogy to make final parts or products, often called series products, even if they are
one-offs. (A deeper discussion can be found in Chapter 6.) The parts can be posi-
tives like connectors as well as negatives like cavities. Making positives or parts is
called direct manufacturing, and the additive manufacturing of negatives or cavi-
ties, such as tools and tool inserts, is called direct tooling; see Fig. 1.7.
Figure 1.9 Rapid manufacturing: direct manufacturing of a three-element dental bridge (left)
(Source: GoetheLab FH Aachen/Sokalla); direct tooling for making golf balls (right) (Source:
EOS GmbH)
10 1 Basics, Definitions, and Application Levels
The terms indirect prototyping, indirect manufacturing, and indirect tooling do not
indicate additive manufacturing/3D printing processes, although it is suggested
by the names. A process is called indirect if it uses additive-manufactured masters
without being an additive process itself. The best-known examples are copying
processes like vacuum casting (also called room-temperature vulcanization (RTV)
or reaction injection molding (RIM).
If indirect processes lead to parts (positives), the process is called indirect proto-
typing, if final products are the result, for example cast parts obtained from (lost)
AM/3DP master models, it is called indirect manufacturing, and if tools or tool
inserts (negatives) are made, it is called indirect tooling (for examples see
Fig. 1.10(a)(b)).
1.3 Hierarchical Structure of Additive Manufacturing Processes 11
Figure 1.10 Indirect Processes: Indirect Prototyping (left), Indirect Tooling (right)
1.3.5 Diversity of Terms
Today, additive manufacturing and 3D printing are regarded as generic terms for
layer technologies. Besides this, many other terms are in use. They change with
time, and even their meaning sometimes changes with time.
With the first introduction of additive manufactured parts and processes in the late
1980s, the generic name was rapid prototyping.
At that time the term rapid prototyping was correct. First, using rapid prototyping
processes, parts could be made much faster. This was mainly because for the
first time parts could be made directly because tools could be avoided, thus saving
time and money. Second, the parts could not be used as products but as prototypes
at best. This was mainly because of the materials available and because of poor
processes.
As a kind of reminiscence of rapid prototyping, even today many processes are
named with the adjective “rapid,” mostly to underline their speed, even if they are
nonadditive.
Besides additive manufacturing/3D printing, the most prominent term is rapid
technology or rapid technologies, but additive manufacturing or, very rarely, form-
ative manufacturing is used as well.
Another family of terms used is linked to layer-based manufacturing. Names like
layer manufacturing or more often additive layer manufacturing (ALM) are used.
As an equivalent to manufacturing, the terms fabrication or production are used
as well.
In addition, in the literature some terms are often used that refer to a specific abil-
ity of a process. For example, solid free-form manufacturing (SFM) underlines that
solids are made that are traced by free-form surfaces. Desktop manufacturing
marks the manufacturing in an office environment (on the desk).
Besides the full names, three- and four-letter abbreviations are used. Often they
lead to confusion rather than to precision. The most-often used ones are explained
in the text or listed in the glossary.
In practice, the terms often are not properly used. Frequently, not even generic
names and brand names are distinguished from each other. For example, many
people call it stereolithography if they speak about AM/3DP in general.
1.4 Integration of Additive Manufacturing in the Product Development Process 13
Many terms and definitions contain the term rapid or fast. But rapid is a relative
term. It only becomes a quality term if “how fast or fast in comparison to what?”
is added.
The term itself is kind of dangerous because it suggests that rapid processes are
basically faster than any other manufacturing processes. This is not true and
cannot be generalized. The speed depends on the geometry. If a board of
250 × 250 × 10 mm is needed, one cuts it from a semifinished bulk. No additive
manufacturing/3D printing process will be faster.
Under special conditions, additive manufacturing processes are faster than nonad-
ditive ones, for example if tools can be avoided, if a volume-independent flexible
output is required, if complex geometries are needed, or if individualized parts are
wanted.
But the term rapid does bear a practical advantage. It is accepted as a synonym of
today’s computerized and therefore automated processes for mainly making proto-
types. It is self-explanatory, which is one of the most important attributes of a
term. That is why people will continue calling AM/3DP rapid prototyping, rapid
tooling, and rapid manufacturing, as it is done sometimes in this book as well.
Industrial product formation involves the time period from the first product idea to
the introduction of the product to the market. It includes the development of the
product, the development and the fabrication of the production facility, and the
production of the product itself.
14 1 Basics, Definitions, and Application Levels
The goal of all manufacturers is to keep this time span as short as possible and
therefore to optimize all subprocesses. Additive manufactured parts are particu-
larly suitable to shortening the product development process and to improving
it at the same time. The biggest influence comes from the fact that expensive
and time-consuming tools can be avoided with the use of additive manufactur-
ing/3D printing.
This effect is enforced if in any phase of product development the optimal AM/3DP
process is used. To identify it, it is favorable to have a correlation between the ap-
plication levels of the additive manufacturing technology (as displayed on Fig. 1.7)
and the phases of the product development process on Fig. 1.11. This shows an
internationally accepted structure, although this particular process chain was
taken from the guidelines of the German Association of Mechanical Engineers, VDI
[VDI 2221].
Product Generation
Product Development
1.7
Product development covers rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing (of the
production facility as well as of the product; see Fig. 1.11, middle). In detail, idea-
tion and conception are improved by concept modeling, while the engineering de-
sign and the technical preparation are supported by functional prototyping. The
fabrication of the products is done by direct manufacturing.
Rapid tooling supports the making of tools and tool inserts. In the prototyping
phase, prototype tooling is applied, and in the production phase direct tooling is
used (see Fig. 1.11, bottom).
A more detailed structure is discussed later in section 4.3.1. The capabilities of the
models (model classes or categories, to be defined later) are linked to the AM fam-
ilies defined in Chapter 3.
In practice, the definitions are not as sharp as displayed here, and their transitions
are smooth. In addition, depending on the product, not every phase is addressed in
each product development process.
AM/3DP is done layer by layer and without product-dependent tools. It does not
matter how many parts are manufactured at once in one build space (as long as
they fit in) and whether they are identical or not. Therefore, AM/3DP enables a
volume-independent production, even with a mixed production containing differ-
ent volumes and one-offs.
AM/3DP shows not only the volume effect mentioned in Section 1.4.2, but also
supports the manufacturing of individually modified products. This is the realiza-
tion of the strategy of customizing, which basically cannot be done using tools.
The individualization of a product can be done by using CAD systems or by the in-
tegration of 3D scans, in so-called reverse engineering. As an example, hearing aid
shells made by AM/3DP are displayed in Fig. 1.12 that show the production and
the finished parts.
Besides this more professional approach, there are part libraries available, even on
the Internet. Along with easy to operate (low-cost or shareware) 3D CAD systems,
this provides easy access to the needed data, even for private and semiprofes-
sional use.
Using AM, virtually everybody can be a manufacturer.
16 1 Basics, Definitions, and Application Levels
Machine class
Designation * Prototyper Fabricator
Personal 3D printer Professional Production machine
3D Printer Production 3D printer
Fabber Personal Office printer Production printer
printer (Shop floor machine)
Use Private, domestic Semiprofes- Professional Professional,
sional office office or production or job shop
workshop
Usage levels (Fig. 1.7)
Prototypes X
Display models
Concept models X
Functional prototypes X
Final products X
Construction material Plastic Plastic Plastic Plastic, metal, ceramic
Price level 500 to 4000 € 1000 to 20,000 to 130,000 to > 800,000 €
[1 € ≈ 1.07 USD] 10,000 € 70,000 €
Example
Prusa Mendel
Personal 3D Printer
In analogy to personal computers, small, simply engineered, shareware-based,
easy to operate (even on a desk), and inexpensive 3D printers are called personal
3D printers. Today they mostly use plastics, but other materials will be available in
the near future.
Fabber
Personal 3D printers in private use are commonly called fabbers. Fabbers are
mostly assembled by the owner and operator himself (DIY printer). The term
18 1 Basics, Definitions, and Application Levels
Professional 3D Printer
Professional 3D printers or office printers are compact, easy to operate, and ser-
vice friendly. Even semiskilled people can operate it in an office environment.
Professional 3D printers have cartridge-supported material changing systems. The
parts can be taken out without contamination of the operators or the environment.
Removal of the support structures and cleaning for the most part can be done auto-
matically or semiautomatically using special washing media and devices.
Operators are trained by tutorials or by a short training session, mostly in-house.
There are no special requirements concerning the infrastructure.
Production 3D Printer
Production 3D printers (or factory work floor printers) enable a continuous
high-quality and high-volume output. Production 3D printers focus on productiv-
ity. Generally, they have big build chambers, material handling systems, and auto-
mated devices for postprocessing.
Production printers are heavy, have big footprints, and cause emissions that are
typical for production machines. Installation, maintenance, and service require
professional support. Operators need to be trained intensively, mainly supported
by the machine manufacturer.
prototyping processes. Like personal 3D printers (at least today), they are limited
to manufacturing parts from plastics.
Production 3D printers are used to make final products or series parts. They can
be one-offs as well as series of any volume, including a mixed production of dif-
ferent parts and volumes. Materials are plastics, ceramics, or metals. Usually the
parts need postprocessing to achieve their final properties and complexion.
But, the correlation by trend between the machine classes and the capability of the
parts cannot be regarded as principles. On one hand, there are fabbers that pro-
duce plastic parts that can be used as products, for example, individually shaped
clamps (Fig. 1.13). On the other hand, there are production printers that make, for
example, hollow turbine blades that only can be used for cold-air testing (Fig. 1.14).
Figure 1.13 Articulated cable clamp, a final product made by laser sintering from polyamide in
one piece. Closed on the left and open on the right (Source: EOS)
Figure 1.14
Cutaway model of a gas turbine blade, gypsum ceramics,
made with a powder-binder process
(Source: IwF-Aachen)