Professional Documents
Culture Documents
for
AW Job #: 2566-002
WWW.ARCHITECTUREWORKS.COM
TEL 205.320.0880
130 NINETEENTH STREET SOUTH
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35233
RAMSAY MCCORMACK BUILDING
The City of Birmingham
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 03 – CONCRETE 9
03 3000 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
DIVISION 04 – MASONRY 11
04 0120 BRICK MASONRY AND TERRA COTTA RESTORATION
04 0140 STONE REPAIR
04 2000 UNIT MASONRY
DIVISION 05 – METALS 12
05 1200 STRUCTURAL STEEL
05 3000 STEEL DECKING
05 4000 COLD FORMED METAL FRAMING
05 5100 METAL STAIRS
DIVISION 08 – OPENINGS 18
08 1100 HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES
08 1400 FLUSH WOOD DOORS AND FRAMES
08 1430 STILE AND RAIL WOOD DOORS
08 3400 FIRE PROTECTED CURTAIN WALL ASSEMBLIES
08 5000 STEEL WINDOWS
08 7000 DOOR HARDWARE
08 8000 ACCESS DOORS
08 9000 LOUVERS AND VENTS
DIVISION 09 – FINISHES 20
09 0000 OUTLINE PARAMETERS FOR INTERIOR FINISHES
DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES 21
10 2000 TOILET COMPARTMENTS
10 2800 TOILET ACCESSORIES
10 4400 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND CABINETS
10 4500 PHOTOLUMINESCENT EGRESS PATH MARKINGS
DIVISION 22 – PLUMBING 23
SEE ENGINEER’S PLUMBING NARRATIVE
DIVISION 26 – ELECTRICAL 23
SEE ENGINEER’S ELECTRICAL NARRATIVE
26 4113 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM
DIVISION 31 – EARTHWORK 27
31 2333 TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING
31 3500 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS
31 3116 TERMITE CONTROL
APPENDICES
This outline, along with the Pricing Drawings, describe the work on the exterior skin
and interior finishes of and additions to the Ramsay McCormack Building at the
Pre-Design stage. This outline lists or describes optional systems in general for
pricing purposes. Being schematic in nature, detail of each system and component
is not specified. Any use of this outline implies complete systems or components for
a finished functioning building, or related portion thereof. This outline follows the
CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) Division Format.
1. The project site will need to be secured at the end of each work day.
Limited debris collection and removal, and materials storage that must occur
within the development area will be coordinated with the City and must be within
a secured and separated area.
3. Contractor must supply job site construction office as well as temporary toilets.
4. All costs associated with project site operations and supervision are to be
provided, including temporary facilities, insurance, clean-up, safety procedures,
and all material and labor costs associated with the proper oversight,
supervision, and operation of construction.
5. Provide access for architect and owner during construction. Access shall be
maintained until each area of exterior improvement is substantially complete.
8. All testing services are to be paid for by the contractor for pricing purposes.
10. The Contractor shall develop an operation and maintenance manual for
materials, systems, and equipment on the project and shall provide that
document to the ownership of the building at project closeout, along with
complete demonstration of each item contained therein.
11. Pricing shall be divided into work on and within the existing Ramsay McCormack
Building and work on the tower additions.
033000 CONCRETE
1. Foundations to be in accordance with the Geotechnical investigation
2. All new basements areas to have cast-in-place concrete retaining walls, columns,
and cantilever spread footings.
3. Main Level floor structure over new basement areas to consist of cast-in-place
concrete beams and elevated concrete floor structure.
4. New 10-story core addition to Ramsay-McCormack tower to consist of deep
foundations with drilled piers.
5. Coordinate all new concrete work with structural narrative by MBA Associates.
6. Concrete construction general requirements:
a. Concrete materials and placement shall comply with ACI standards.
b. Slabs on Grade – Assume 6" thick slabs reinforced with No. 4 bars at 16”
O.C. each way.
c. Concrete compressive strength at 28 days (PSI), typ. of concrete, maximum
water cement ratio, air content, slump and concrete use: assume 3,000 psi
for slabs on grade; 4,000 psi for shallow foundations, retaining walls,
columns, and other elevated structural concrete.
d. Uncoated reinforcing bars shall comply with ASTM A615/A615M or ASTM
A 996/A 996M, Grade 60 (Grade 420).
e. All reinforcing shall be detailed in accordance with A.C.I. standards 315, of
latest revision.
f. All welded wire fabric shall conform to ASTM A-185. Welded wire fabric
shall be lapped a minimum of 1'-0" and shall be furnished in sheets only
(No Rolls).
g. Wall vertical reinforcing shall be lapped with a class "b" splice and wall
horizontal reinforcing shall be lapped 30 diameters at splice points. Provide
corner bars for walls.
h. All splices shall be class "B" tension lap splice, unless noted otherwise.
i. Finishing of Exposed Surfaces: Match existing conditions unless otherwise
noted on drawings.
j. Install 10 mill vapor retarder equal to Stego Industries, LLC Stego 15 under
slabs on grade. Install per manufacturer’s instructions lapping and sealing
joints and penetrations.
k. Place slabs on minimum 4" of porous gravel fill.
l. Finish slabs with trowel finish. Finish and measure surface so gap at any
point between concrete surface and unleveled freestanding, 10 foot long
straight edge resting on two high spots does not exceed 1/8". Provide floor
slab recesses as required for finish floor materials and for walk-in
refrigerator at kitchen.
m. Cold Weather Placement: Comply with ACI 306.1.
Hot Weather Placement: Comply with ACI 301.
071000 WATERPROOFING
1. Fluid-Applied Waterproofing:
a. Provide fluid applied waterproofing around all existing (Ramsay
McCormack tower) and new foundation walls that are adjacent to occupied
basement space, forming a complete enclosure to minimum 12-inches
below finish floor slab.
b. Basis of Design: W.R. Meadows, Inc., MEL-ROL LM. Cured thickness 60-
mils minimum, suitable for installation over concrete substrates. Provide
protection board to prevent damage during backfilling.
c. At back side of waterproofing and protection board, provide min. 18” wide
area of porous fill, surrounded by filter fabric. At base of porous fill,
provide sock covered perforated pipe drainage system to sump and
mechanical pump system to municipal storm structures.
2. Crystalline Waterproofing:
a. Provide crystalline waterproofing on interior and floor surfaces of all new
elevator pits.
b. Basis of Design: XYPEX Chemical Corporation, XYPEX Concentrate with
second coat of XYPEX Modified.
2. At new doors, provide commercial grade hardware with full mortised locks, exit
devices, ball bearing hinges, closers, stops, weatherstripping, sweeps, drip caps,
etc. New locking devices to be Sargent, fully mortised, lever handle or pull/panic
hardware, function as appropriate to the condition, or equal. Finish selected by
Architect from full range.
3. Locking devices to be coordinated with Owner’s master key system. Assume
Medco cylinders with proprietary key system.
utilizing crimp-type pressure devices will not be allowed. All bolts, screws and
related type hardware shall be stainless steel.
8. All materials shall be copper or copper alloys as described above, UL approved
and labeled as required, and of the size, weight, and construction to suit the
application where used in accordance with Code requirements for the Class of
structure involved, and as per manufacturer recommendations.
a. Air terminals shall be solid, ½” diameter round copper bar, full nickel
plated, and of sufficient length to project 10” minimum above the object to
be protected, and UL labeled. Locate and space points in accordance with
L.P.I. requirements.
b. Point bases shall be cast bronze with bolt-pressure cable connectors.
Parapet type units shall provide for 1-1/2” coping overhand. Adhesive
type bases for flat roofs shall have a minimum surface contact area of 18.5
square inches, and be secure with a proper adhesive.
c. Conductors shall be braided smooth twist or rope-lay stranding
commercially pure copper cable, sized per Code and U.L. labeled.
d. Ground rods shall be ¾” diameter and 10’-0” long copper-clad steel,
connected to system downlead cable with tow-bolt bronze clamp with
stainless steel cap screws. Driven depth to be minimum of 12-feet.
e. Cable fasteners shall be substantial in construction, compatible with the
conductor and mounting surfaces, and spaced according to Code
requirements.
f. Bonding devices, cable splicers, and miscellaneous connectors shall be cast
bronze with bolt pressure cable connections with stainless steel hardware.
Any connections between dissimilar metals shall be made with approved bi-
metallic connectors or spacers.
9. Contractor shall have supplier of system design system in accordance with these
specifications furnishing shop drawing for approval.
10.Building is bearing masonry and cast-in-place concrete frame, so building
structure may not be used as part of the lightning protection system.
11.All equipment and materials shall be installed in a neat workmanlike manner by
skilled installers, under the direct field supervision of a Certified Master Installer
who has qualified under the LPI’s Certification Program or similar installation
training.
a. System installation shall be complete, including necessary cable networks
on the roof for air terminals and devices, bonding networks and taps for
grounding equipment and roof metals, and downlead conductors routed
concealed in building structure to ground level. Where downleads and
risers penetrate roofs and walls, suitable ½” copper rod type thru-roof
connectors shall be used, equipped with necessary lead or neoprene
washers and nuts for watertight seal.
b. System installers shall thoroughly coordinate their work with other trades to
insure a correct, neat, and unobtrusive complete installation.
12.A common ground shall be provided between the lightning protection system and
the building electric and telephone service grounds. In addition, all underground
metallic piping systems shall be bonded with full size conductor; including water,
gas, sewer, fuel oil, and any other piping system, at points where these pipings
enter the building.
a. The building electrical service shall be provided with a set of lightning surge
arresters, secondary as required. Only valve type arrestors will be
acceptable, either single or three-phase as required.
b. Bonding of all metallic objects and systems at roof levels and elsewhere on
the structure shall be complete. Primary bonds for metal bodies of
conductance shall be bonded with appropriate fittings and full-time
conductor; and shall consist of but not be limited to the following: Exhaust
vents and any other roof piping systems, cooling towers, antenna mast for
TV, radio or microwave, flag poles, roof handrails and or decorative
screens, roof ladders, metal stacks, etc. Exterior architectural metal fascia
and/or curtain wall mullions, which extend the full height of the structure
shall also be bonded, if not inherently bonded thru the building frame.
c. Metal bodies of inductance located within six feet of a conductor or object
with primary bonds, shall be bonded with secondary cable and fittings.
Typical of these are: plumbing vent stacks, roof flashings, parapet coping
caps, gravel guards, isolated metal building panels or siding, roof drains,
downspouts, roof ventilators, exterior balcony handrails, lower level
sizeable miscellaneous metals, etc.
13.The manufacturer’s local representative shall be a Certified Master Installer and
shall provide direct jobsite technical supervision to Contractor’s personnel during
installation to insure compliance with all Code requirements.
14.Upon job completion, Contractor shall furnish Owner with written documentation
that system is installed and has been provided with a U.L. Master Label
certification as per U.L. Code 96A
Prepared for
ArchitectureWorks
CONTENTS
• Contents
• Exterior Walls
◊ Structural Clay Tile
◊ Plaster
◊ Brick Masonry
◊ Parapets
◊ Glazed Terra Cotta
◊ Granite
◊ Storefront
◊ Coatings
◊ “Star”
• Roof
◊ Roof Covering
◊ Drainage
• Exterior Windows
◊ Windows
◊ Window Sills
• Interiors
◊ 1st Floor Elevator Lobby
» Floors
» Walls
» Elevator Doors
» Ceiling
◊ Stairs
» Basement to 2nd Floor
◊ Upper Floor Elevator Lobby and Corridor
» Floors
» Walls
» Doors
» Ceilings
» Elevators
EXTERIOR WALLS
Scope of work:
• Clean debris out from all exposed window sills and jambs.
Assume 25%.
• Repoint interior sills and jambs where exposed and deteri-
orated. Assume 25%
• Protect tile and brick during construction activities
PLASTER
Scope of work:
• D e m o l i s h re m a i n i n g p l a s t e r a n d
metallic accessories
• Install new beads and plaster.
• New plaster shall be traditional 3-coat system,
1-3/8” thick to match existing.
• An alternative system may be considered:
◊ 7/8” galvanized hat channel furring
◊ 5/8” plaster base board
◊ 2-coat plaster veneer
BRICK MASONRY
• Binder:
◊ 1 part lime
◊ 2.5 parts Portland cement
6
• Aggregate:
◊ 2.6 parts sand to 1 part binder
• Color:
◊ To match Munsell 5Y 8/1
Scope of Work:
Parapet corners are clay tile infill faced with a single wythe of
brick on either side. Parapet walls between corners appear to be
triple wythe brick.
The northeast corner of the 10th floor parapet has been severely
damaged and is missing brick and terra cotta. Some of these
elements appear to be stored inside the penthouse.
7
GLAZED TERRA COTTA
Scope of work:
The first floor entry pilaster bases are clad in a brown highly figured granite.
Scope of work:
8
STOREFRONT
Scope of work:
9
COATINGS
All brick and terra cotta has been coated with an unknown material. Due to
the resilient nature of glazed brick and terra cotta, chemical cleaners can
be used to completely remove this coating from the building.
Scope of work:
“STAR” FEATURES
There are two large “star” features on top of the building. Based on historic photographs of the exterior (from the
Birmingham News, dated May 27, 1954), these stars are non-historic and should be demolished.
Scope of work:
• Demolish stars.
ROOF
ROOF COVERING
The historic roofing is built-up asphalt. It is currently covered with temporary TPO.
Scope of work:
10
(including termination bars and counterflashing as appropriate to membrane assembly).
• Properly integrate new roofing with roof drains.
DRAINAGE
The penthouse roof is drained via a single conductor head and 4” square downspout on the west face of the building.
This drainage has failed and is pouring water down the side of the penthouse. This roof is approximately 900 SF.
It drains directly onto the stair overrun (see below).
The 10th floor roof is drained by three approximately 4” inside-diameter roof drains. The roof is approximately 2,500
SF in area. The three roof drains daylight through the 10th floor walls below and drain directly onto the 9th floor roof.
There is a stair overrun that is approximately 100 SF in area. This drains to the 9th floor roof via a conductor head
and 4.5” x 2.25” rectangular downspout on the north face of the building. This area also drains the penthouse roof.
The 9th floor roof is approximately 1,400 SF and is drained by four approximately 4” inside-diameter roof drains.
This roof collects all of the runoff from the above floors.
Finally, there are four small triangular roofs above the 8th floor corners. These are each approximately 25 SF. Each
connects to one of the four 9th floor roof drains via an approximately 2” inside diameter drain.
All internal roof drains are flush with the roof surface and may not be properly flashing into the surrounding roof,
which is contributing to leaks within the building.
SMACNA 5th Edition Table 1-2 shows that for a 100-year storm in Birmingham, Alabama, 120 square feet of roof
area can be drained per 1 square inch of downspout area. Based on this information, it appears that the building
has adequate drainage capacity.
However, it appears that the roof drains are both clogged and likely have leaks.
It is recommended to replace all drains and leaders with new of similar or
larger size.
Scope of work:
EXTERIOR WINDOWS
WINDOWS
The existing windows are constructed from steel angle between 1/8” and ¼”
thick and of width between 1” and 1.5”. All windows are corroded to varying
degree. Several have an exterior coating that is failing and appears to be
non-historic. Windows appear to be glazed with 1/8” thick single pane glass.
Windows appear to have been grouted directly into the surrounding substrate.
It can be assumed that the outer steel frame extrusions of the window have
been fully packed with grout, which will need to be removed. This is likely
11
contributing to the heavy corrosion since on the window frames, especially at
upper floors.
The lower sash of all windows appears to have been designed to operate as
a reverse hopper, with the sash pulling toward the interior and hinging at the
bottom. The middle sash was designed as an awning window, pushing out toward
the exterior and hinging at the top. The top sash is fixed. Most windows appear
to have been welded shut, and most are missing some or all hardware. However
enough hardware remains to make replica hardware feasible.
It appears that metal clips were used to hold the glazing in place and glazing
compound applied. The depth of the sash channel is typically 1”, and with minor
modifications the windows will be able to accommodate a standard Insulated
Glazed Unit (IGU).
If windows are restored to operability, life safety code may require that limiters
be installed depending on the final height from finished floor to window sill.
Scope of Work:
• Mockup:
◊ Install a mock-up utilizing a restored window, with all flashings and seal-
ants in place. Perform ASTM E1105 water penetration test.
• Remove all windows. Retain windows that can be restored. Replicate and replace
windows that cannot be restored. See schedule below for assumed percentages.
• Remove salvageable hardware from existing windows and reuse for
restored windows.
• For pricing, assume that windows will be restored to operability with 4” limiters.
• For windows that can be restored:
◊ Remove all corrosion and coatings to bare metal.
◊ Install new high performance steel coating. System shall be epoxy primer,
epoxy intermediate coat, and urethane finish coat.
◊ Reglaze windows.
◊ Install any replicated hardware.
◊ Reinstall windows.
• For windows that must be replicated:
◊ Use a historic window as basis for replication.
◊ New window material shall be steel.
◊ Provide high performance steel coating to match system
described above.
◊ Reinstall windows.
• Window trim
◊ Salvage existing wood trim around windows. Assume
10% of windows will still have trim.
◊ After reinstallation of trim, reinstall wood trim. Replicate
new with wood as required (assume 90% of windows).
◊ Window replacement schedule:
12
◊ 2nd Floor
» Replace 10% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace eyelets on 25% of units
» Replace brackets on 25% of units
◊ 3rd Floor
» Replace 10% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 25% of units
» Replace brackets on 50% of units
◊ 4th Floor
» Replace 10% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 100% of units
» Replace brackets on 75% of units
◊ 5th Floor
» Replace 10% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 25% of units
» Replace brackets on 50% of units
◊ 6th Floor
» Replace 25% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 100% of units
» Replace brackets on 100% of units
◊ 7th Floor
» Replace 50% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 75% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 100% of units
» Replace brackets on 75% of units
◊ 8th Floor
» Replace 50% of units
» Replace 1 sash (lower or upper) on 10% of units
» Replace lower sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace middle sash hardware on 100% of units
» Replace eyelets on 100% of units
» Replace brackets on 100% of units
◊ 9th Floor
» Replace 100% of units
◊ 10th Floor
» Replace 100% of units
◊ Penthouse
» Replace 100% of units
13
WINDOW SILLS
Scope of work:
INTERIORS
1ST FLOOR ELEVATOR LOBBY
FLOORS
The flooring in the lobby appears to be black and white marble tiles.
The flooring has a continuous 10” black tile border. The field is
a pattern of 12” square black and white tiles in an alternating
checkerboard pattern.
Scope of work:
• Clean floor.
• Replace 5% of floor tiles.
• Grind, hone, polish, and buff floor.
WALLS
The typical wall finish in this space is white marble, with scagliola
base throughout. One door has a surviving scagliola header trim.
There may have been scagliola door jamb trim, as there are 4”
around each door in this space where trim has been demolished.
Walls terminate in a white marble crown molding.
Elevator light sconce rough-ins remain, but the covers are missing and it is impossible to know what the historic fixtures were.
14
There is some wall finish material stored in the northeast corner of the corridor, however much of it appears to be chipped
or cracked and it cannot be assumed that any of this material will be fit for reuse.
The south wall has several openings that will housed fire equipment, electrical panels, etc. All corroded metal should be
removed from these openings. They can be reused for other purposes or covered.
Scope of work:
The historic elevator outer doors are missing. The interior doors are extremely corroded.
Scope of work:
The historic ceiling in the elevator lobby is vaulted, with plaster base finish, and a regular
pattern of plaster ribs and octagonal medallions that have been painted a gold color.
Some of the medallions have become dislodged and fallen to the floor below. The entire
ceiling is in need of rehabilitation.
The ceiling in the west entrance lobby is also vaulted, but not as ornate as the elevator
lobby. Eight plaster ribs spring from above the surrounding walls and meet in the center
of the ceiling in an octagonal feature where a light fixture previously hung. The light
fixture does not survive.
Scope of work:
The historic lobbies include a stair that connects the basement, 1st floor, and 2nd floor.
The tread depth averages 9 inches and the riser height varies between 7-1/2 and 8 inches,
meaning that the stair does not comply with life safety code and cannot be used as a
means of egress. The stair from 1st floor to 2nd floor is also very narrow.
Treads are white marble, worn from years of use. Several treads have been damaged
or are missing.
15
Risers are scagliola. All risers appear to be intact.
Scope of work:
• Clean risers.
• Refer to drawings for tread and handrail replacement.
UPPER FLOOR ELEVATOR LOBBY AND CORRIDOR
(FLOORS 2-10)
FLOORS
Scope of work:
The vitreous tile was installed using adhesive “biscuits,” which are all failing. Tile is
falling off walls and can be removed from the “biscuits” without damaging the tile.
Scope of work:
• Assume 20% of corridor walls will require metal stud infill where clay tile has been
demolished. Infill assembly will be metal studs and cement board.
• Refer to drawings for quantity of vitreous tile that must be replaced.
• Carefully remove and store all loose vitreous tile from walls. Remove adhesive
“biscuits” from walls and reinstall tile directly to clay tile and infill cement board
using polymer-modified wall tile mortar.
16
DOORS
Scope of work:
Scope of work:
17
ELEVATORS
Scope of work:
18
MW / DAVIS DUMAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2720 3RD AVENUE SOUTH PHONE: (205) 252-0246
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35233 FAX: (205) 251-8506
July 7, 2016
CODES:
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Provide all labor, materials, equipment, and services necessary for the completion of all
Plumbing work, complete and ready for operation, consisting in general of the following:
A. Removal of all existing sanitary drain, waste and vent piping, domestic water
piping, storm water piping and roof drains, and all plumbing fixtures.
B. A system of sanitary drain, waste, and vent piping
C. A system of domestic water piping
D. A system of roof drains and storm water piping
E. Elevator sump pumps and oil separation (as required)
F. A basement sump pump system to remove ground water infiltration.
G. Provide plumbing fixtures and equipment as shown on drawings.
Piping shall be service weight cast iron above grade (hubless pipe and fittings above grade), or
DWV copper. Piping shall be PVC –DWV with solvent weld joints below grade. Include floor
drains for restrooms, mechanical rooms, and janitor’s closets.
Piping shall be heavy weight cast iron above grade (hubless pipe and fittings above grade).
Piping shall be PVC –DWV with solvent weld joints below grade. Include roof drains and
overflow drains and associated piping.
DOMESTIC WATER:
Page 1 of 3
MWDDA 217003
RAMSAY MCCORMACK BUILDING
PLUMBING NARRATIVE
July 7, 2017
Piping shall be fiberglass insulated type L (type K outside) hard copper with wrought copper
fittings. Provide water distribution piping within building to all fixtures and equipment. Bronze
ball valves (2” and smaller) or gate valves/butterfly valves (2-1/2” and larger) are to be used on
the project to isolate fixtures. Water hammer arrestors shall be installed at all toilets and at all
equipment with automatic (solenoid) valves.
Provide a duplex multistage vertical booster pump system as required for demand, complete
with controls and hydromechanical tank (tank on upper floor). Each pump shall be 67% of total
building demand.
Domestic Water Heating shall be provided to the courts area by a 50 gallon electric water
heater. Upper floors will use a 30 gallon electric water heater on every other floor, serving two
floors each. Provide recirculating systems for 140 F to janitor’s sinks, and 120 F to other
fixtures.
FIXTURES:
Security fixtures shall be stainless steel floor mount, hidden flush valves.
Water Closets are wall hung white vitreous china, electronic flush valve, open front seat,
1.6 gpf.
Urinals are wall-hung with carrier, white vitreous china, ADA compliant, electronic flush
valve, 3/4" inlet, 0.5 gpf.
Lavatories are white vitreous china, with overflow, ADA compliant, electronic faucet,
trap, and supplies, 0.5 gpm. Lavatories in public restrooms shall be equipped with point
of use thermostatic mixing valves to meet ASSE 1070.
Electric water coolers shall be bi-level, wall mount with carrier, stainless steel, must meet
ADA.
Janitor’s receptors shall be floor mounted, terrazzo, faucet to include integral checks and
stops, splash guard, hose, and mop hanger.
MISCELLANEOUS:
Domestic cold water shall be delivered to wall hydrants around the building at approximately
100’ apart, minimum one on each wall.
Provide a duplex storm water sump pump system, including sump, pumps, rails, floats, and
control system with alarm. Pumps shall each be capable of 200 gpm at 20 feet of head. Piping
shall be schedule 40 galvanized until returned to gravity drain.
Page 2 of 3
MWDDA 217003
RAMSAY MCCORMACK BUILDING
PLUMBING NARRATIVE
July 7, 2017
Provide elevator sump pumps for each pit. Pumps shall be capable of 50 gpm per car. Piping
shall be schedule 40 galvanized until returned to gravity drain. Pumps in pits serving hydraulic
elevators shall discharge indirectly to oil separators prior to returning to gravity drain. Include
floats and all controls.
Page 3 of 3
MWDDA 217003
MW / DAVIS DUMAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2720 3RD AVENUE SOUTH PHONE: (205) 252-0246
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35233 FAX: (205) 251-8506
July 7, 2016
Fire protection
All fire protection work shall comply with applicable state and local codes,
including, but not limited to:
The building will be provided with a wet automatic sprinkler system supplied
by an electric driven horizontal split case fire pump with solid state soft start
with automatic transfer switch. The required capacity is: 1000 GPM at ?? psi, ??
HP, 480 volts, three phase, 60 cycle, 1770 RPM. (PSI and HP to be based on
flow test results)
The 8” fire service entrance underground piping to start at 5'-0" outside the
building to a point 1'-0" above the floor in the building. Flow requirement is
1000 gpm at ?? psi.
Page 1 of 2
MWDDA 217003
RAMSAY MCCORMACK BUILDING
Fire Protection NARRATIVE
July 5, 2017
Page 2 of 2
MWDDA 217003
MW / DAVIS DUMAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2720 3RD AVENUE SOUTH PHONE: (205) 252-0246
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35233 FAX: (205) 251-8506
The single level portion of the building and the first floor of the tower will be conditioned
by 2 or more variable air volume air handling units (AHU) with each unit serving a portion
of the area. The air handling units will be installed in mechanical rooms on the first floor.
The units will have variable speed supply fans serving a variable volume air distribution
system, electric preheat coils, chilled water cooling coils, and MERV 8 pleated filters.
These units will have an air side economizer section. Chilled water for the AHU’s will be
provided by a packaged air cooled chiller located on the single level roof. Pumps,
hydronic specialties, and buffer tank will be designed as part of the chiller package.
AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: The tower VRF indoor units will be installed above the
ceilings in the conditioned spaces, between the structural beams, and will serve
individual zones. Air distribution ductwork will be smaller than would be required from a
central air handling unit. Supply diffusers in lay-in ceilings will be square louver face
diffusers fitted to the ceiling grid (9”X9” inlet and larger) and surface mounted in
gypboard ceilings or where neck size is less than 9”X9”. If possible the VRF indoor units
will be mounted above lay-in ceilings to allow service access. When mounted above
hard ceilings, access doors in the ceilings will be required.
The single level part of the building and the first floor of the tower will have variable
volume supply air from the variable air volume air conditioning units distributed to
variable air terminal units though externally insulated galvanized steel medium pressure
sheet metal ductwork. Round branch ducts with flex connections will supply air to the
terminal units. The terminal units will modulate the flow of cooled and dehumidified air to
the space through low pressure galvanized sheet metal duct to maintain space
temperature setpoint. When heating is required, electric heaters in the terminal units will
Page 1 of 2
MWDDA 217003
RAMSAY MCCORMACK BUILDING
HVAC NARRATIVE
July 13, 2017
provide heat to the spaces. Return from the spaces will be through a return ceiling
plenum to the return inlets at the AHU’s. Return through partitions in the ceiling plenum
will be through transfer ducts. Supply diffusers in lay-in ceilings will be square louver
face diffusers (9”X9” inlet and above) and surface mounted in gypboard ceilings or
where neck size is less than 9”X9”.
VENTILATION: Outside air for the 10 level building tower will be induced into a roof
mounted heat reclaim unit at a rate to satisfy occupant requirements and makeup air for
exhaust systems. Air will be exhausted from the building by the heat reclaim unit in an
amount to create a slightly positive pressure in the building. Chases will be required
through the 10 levels of the tower for the outside and exhaust air ducted to and from the
heat reclaim unit. Multiple chases will allow each chase to be smaller and may result in
less need to cross the building under low concrete beams. An alternate configuration
would allow the heat reclaim unit to be installed on the single level part of the building.
The chases through the 10 level tower for the outside ventilation air and exhaust air are
required in either case.
When the outside air temperature is below about 50°F, and cooling is required in the first
floor of the building, larger quantities of outside air will be supplied to the AHU’S. This
economizer cycle will allow lower cost space cooling. Exhaust systems will be ducted
from areas requiring exhaust to exhaust fans on the single level roof.
CONTROLS: Controls for the 10 level tower VRF systems will be factory furnished and
interfaced with the building automation system. Each VRF indoor unit will be controlled
by a space mounted sensor.
For the single level part of the building, control of the AHU’s and variable air volume
reheat terminals will be electronic with sensors in the space. The AHU’s will be provided
with electronic controls as a part of the building automation system.
The VRF systems, exhaust systems, heat reclaim system, AHU’s and terminal unit
controls will be connected to a stand-alone, building automation system. Operator
interface with the building automation system for monitoring system operation or
modifying control functions will be by a PC based operator’s station.
STAIR PRESSURIZATION: In the 10 level building tower all the stairwells used for life
safety egress from the building will be pressurized by roof mounted supply fans. The
fans will be started by interlock with the fire alarm system.
SECURE AREAS: All ductwork penetrating walls or ceilings in secure areas will have
security bars if the cross section of the duct exceeds 8”X 8”. The holding cells will have
maximum security grilles and diffusers and the corridors and supervised areas will have
minimum security grilles and diffusers.
Page 2 of 2
MWDDA 217003
HYDE ENGINEERING
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
The new electrical service will be 277/480 3P, 4W, 2,000A, fed underground from a
transformer. A 600 kW, diesel generator will back up emergency lighting, selected
receptacles and HVAC load and the fire pump. Please refer to riser diagram for power
distribution.
LIGHTING
Lighting in the offices will consist mainly of 2’ x 4’ and 2’ x 2’ dimmable, LED lay-in
fixtures. The court rooms will consist of a combination of architectural pendants, LED
recessed downlights, and LED wall sconces. Strip LED fixtures will be used in service
areas like electrical rooms, janitor’s closet, etc. Exterior lighting consists of LED pole
lighting in parking areas, and architectural, LED wall sconces on the building. In
addition, linear LED exterior fixtures will up lighting the perimeter of the top of the
building
The main lobby will consist of high-end, architectural pendants and wall sconces. The
corridors and elevator lobbies will consist of LED wall sconces with special attention
being paid to installation. Since the original glass wall tile will need to be maintained
with new glass tile filling in where needed.
Lighting controls will consist of a building wide control system with occupancy sensors
used in restrooms, storage, mechanical, and offices. The court rooms, corridors, lobbies
and exterior lighting will be control through the lighting control system.
WIRING DEVICES
Each room will have the appropriate number of duplex receptacles based on occupancy.
Flush mounted floor boxes will also be provided when wall mounting devices is not
feasible. Consideration will need to made when mounting devices to existing exterior
walls since there is limited space in which to run conduit and mounted boxes.
EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS
Power will be provided to all equipment including HVAC, plumbing.
TELEPHONE/DATA SYSTEM
Telephone and data outlets will be provided in the office and courtrooms. A telephone
backboard and security backboard will be provided on each floor. Please refer to
data/comm riser.
Cable TV outlets will be located in rooms to be determined. Backboards with power will
be provided in selected electrical rooms.
FIRE ALARM
The building will have new fire alarm system with voice evacuation. See fire alarm riser.
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, ENGINEERING, & PERMITS
ARCHITECTURE DIVISION
710 20TH STREET NORTH
ROOM 220 - CITY HALL
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203
Prepared By:
City of Birmingham
Department of Planning, Engineering, & Permits
Architecture Division
710 20th Street North
Room 220 - City Hall
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Bhate Environmental Associates, Inc. (Bhate) is pleased to submit the following report of the
Limited Hazardous Materials Survey conducted at the Ramsay-McCormack Building located at
Corner of Avenue E and 19th Street in Ensley, Alabama. This survey was conducted in accordance
with Bhate's proposal number 10-1145, dated December 10, 2010.
Bhate appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions
regarding the information contained in this report, or if we can be of further service, please do not
hesitate to call.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Purpose and Scope of Services ..........................................................1
2
Project Characteristics.........................................................................2
3
Sampling Methodologies .....................................................................3
4
Homogeneous Material Assessment Factors......................................4
4.1
Homogeneous Areas .................................................................................. 4
4.2
Asbestos Hazard Assessment Factors....................................................... 4
4.3
Lead-Based Paint Assessment Factors...................................................... 4
5
Laboratory Analysis .............................................................................5
6
Asbestos Sampling Results.................................................................6
7
Lead-Based Paint Sampling Results .................................................14
8
Estimation of Quantities.....................................................................17
9
Potentially Hazardous materials ........................................................19
9.1
Fluorescent Lights .................................................................................... 19
9.2
Elevator Motors......................................................................................... 19
9.3
Mold .......................................................................................................... 19
10
Current Regulations...........................................................................20
10.1
Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................. 20
10.2
Lead-Based Paint ..................................................................................... 20
11
Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................22
11.1
Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................. 22
11.2
Lead-Based Paint ..................................................................................... 22
11.3
Other Potentially Hazardous Materials ..................................................... 23
12
Assumptions and Limitations.............................................................24
Appendices
A Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Results
B Lead-Based Paint Laboratory Analysis Results
2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
The subject site consists of one parcel of land developed with the Ramsay-McCormack Building.
The Ramsay-McCormack Building (built in 1929 and renovated in 1970) is a ten-story office
building with a basement and a mechanical penthouse. The structure has been vacant since
1986. The building is in severe disrepair caused by neglect, weathering, and vandalism.
The structure is constructed of a cast-in-place concrete frame with perimeter columns and one
row of interior supports. The frame is filled in with structural clay tile walls and clad in beige
brick. The ground floor is trimmed with brown granite and terra cotta. The roof parapet is also
accented with terra cotta.
The interior of the structure is divided by floors. The ground floor is divided into several former
office/store spaces, which at one time included a bank, several law and doctor offices and a
pharmacy. Floors 2 through 10 have similar interior designs and are divided into offices with a
central hallway. Each floor has restrooms and a mechanical room.
Interior finishes for the structure include ceramic tile, terrazzo tile, marble wall tile, drywall,
plaster, textured wall and ceiling material, carpet, and various types of floor tile and paint coated
surfaces. At the time of the survey, the basement of the structure was flooded with
approximately one foot of water. Two large insulated boilers were observed in the basement.
Several insulated pipe runs were visible in the basement and were identified on all floors in pipe
chases. Also, other unidentified insulated pipes, leading from the basement boiler system were
observed running along the basement ceiling and may be hidden inside the walls of all floors.
It should be noted that the building is in a dilapidated and unsafe condition. Fallen building
material debris was observed in several locations throughout the subject building. Also, due to
the condition of the building, not all areas could be evaluated for suspect material. After
sampling of the 10th floor, a portion of the staircase leading to the 10th floor fell making upper
levels inaccessible.
3 SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
A visual inspection was performed at the subject building. Bulk asbestos samples were obtained
by placing suspected material into individual sample containers for transport to a qualified
laboratory for analysis. All samples were individually identified by a sample number. The
suspect ACMs were numbered and correspond to the sample numbers listed in the Polarized
Light Microscopy (PLM) Analysis Summary located in Appendix A. PLM and dispersion
staining techniques were performed according to the EPA's Bulk Analysis Method EPA 600/M4-
82-020 in an attempt to ascertain asbestos content in those samples analyzed.
LBP sampling was primarily conducted by obtaining paint chip samples from coated surfaces
located at the subject site. Suspect LBP samples were obtained by placing suspect materials into
individual sample containers for transport to an accredited laboratory for analysis. The methods
and protocols published by HUD (Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based
Paint Hazards in Housing, 1997) were followed for paint chip collection. All samples were
individually identified by a sample number that directly corresponds to sample numbers listed in
the Flame Atomic Absorption (FAA) Analysis Summary found in Appendix B. All paint chip
samples were analyzed by using FAA in accordance with the EPA SW846 method, as
recommended by HUD.
5 LABORATORY ANALYSIS
All bulk suspect asbestos samples were analyzed by a qualified laboratory using Polarized Light
Microscopy with dispersion staining techniques. PLM and dispersion staining techniques were
performed according to the EPA's Bulk Analysis Method EPA 600/M4-82-020 in an attempt to
ascertain asbestos content in those samples analyzed. These techniques require that a part of the
bulk sample be subjected to an oil of specific refractive index once mounted on a slide. This
prepared slide is then subjected to a number of optical tests. Each type of asbestos displays
unique characteristics when subjected to these tests. Percentages of asbestos content are then
determined by visual estimation.
Any material containing greater than one percent of any type of asbestos that is friable or may
become friable by the forces expected to act on the material during certain activities, is classified
as RACM by the EPA. It should be noted that OSHA defines an asbestos-containing material
(ACM) to be a material containing any amount of asbestos. According to the EPA, OSHA,
United Stated Department of Transportation (USDOT), and other federal, state, and/or local
government agencies, any material classified as ACM must be handled accordingly.
All suspect lead-based paint chip samples were analyzed by using FAA in accordance with the
EPA SW846 methods, as recommended by HUD. The sample results having a lead content
equal to or greater than the regulatory limit of 0.5% lead by weight are identified as positive (i.e.
lead-based paint).
Roof
Mechanical Penthouse
10th Floor
Hallway wall
6-10-WI1-1 Electrical wire wrap None Detected Non-friable Poor
electrical outlet
North End
7-10-PM1-1 Room 2 – In “Pyrobar” block mortar None Detected Non-friable Poor
wall
North End
8-10-PB1-1 Room 2 – In White “pyrobar” block None Detected Non-friable Poor
wall
9th Floor
8th Floor
7th Floor
25-7-DT2-1 Duct in Hall Cream duct tape 69% Chrysotile Friable Poor
6th Floor
5th Floor
4th Floor
3rd Floor
47-3-WP1-1 Room 5 Textured green wall paint None Detected Friable Poor
2nd Floor
50-2-CI1-1 Hall
Cork Brown cork pipe insulation None Detected Non-friable Poor
1St Floor
Room 500 on
159-1-PW1-1 Grey pipe wrap 69% Chrysotile Friable Poor
floor
On floor at
68-1-FD1-3 Floor debris 69% Chrysotile Friable Poor
elevators
Basement
61-B-CL1-1 Column Column skim coat and plaster None Detected Friable Poor
62-B-SK1-1 Wall at stairs Wall skim coat None Detected Friable Poor
63-B-SK1-2 Wall at stack Wall skim coat None Detected Friable Poor
Ceiling near
64-B-DM1-1 Dot mastic None Detected Non-friable Poor
stack
66-B-SW1-1 Chimney Stack Stack wrap insulation None Detected Friable Poor
9% Chrysotile
67-B-BI1-1 Boiler Boiler insulation Friable Poor
20% Amosite
1
Friability was determined according to a material’s current condition.
Friable: Materials that can be crumbled, crushed, or pulverized under hand pressure
Non-Friable: Materials that do not meet the definition of friable
Category I Non-Friable: Non-friable ACMs such as gaskets, valve packings, resilient vinyl floor covering (floor
tile and linoleum), and asphalt roofing material
Category II Non-Friable: Includes all other non-friable ACMs
2
It should be noted that the condition of the materials sampled is based on the top layer of the sampled materials only
at the time of sampling.
It should be noted that EPA defines RACM as any material having greater than 1% asbestos
content that is friable or may become friable by the forces expected to act on the material during
certain activities.
It should be noted that the condition listed for each material was based on observations at
the time of the sampling event. The condition of the material may change over time due to
various factors such as moisture and disturbance.
Based on the laboratory analysis results, 23 of the 53 homogenous areas were identified as
containing asbestos. These asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are as follows:
A. Friable ACM
Bhate’s inspection identified friable asbestos-containing homogenous materials. These materials
are listed in detail below:
• Pipe insulation on runs and elbows (homogenous areas AC1, PI1, and PI2) was
identified as having asbestos content ranging from 52% to 69% Chrysotile asbestos.
These materials were observed in vertical pipe chases running through all floors. Also,
various insulated pipe runs were observed above the hard ceiling near the bathrooms on
all floors. Pipes appear to begin in at the basement boilers, run through each floor and
terminate in the penthouse. All pipe insulation was noted to be in poor condition.
• Flooring debris (homogenous areas FD1 and FD2) was identified as containing either
29% or 69% Chrysotile asbestos. All floors throughout the building were covered with
debris from delaminated wall and ceiling textures and damaged pipe insulation.
• Textured material on plaster walls and ceilings (homogenous areas TC1 and WT1)
was identified as containing 26% Chrysotile asbestos. This material was observed on the
interior walls and ceilings of Floors 2 thorough 8. This material has delaminated and
been tracked throughout the building. The material was noted to be in poor condition.
• White and cream colored duct tape (homogenous areas DT1 and DT2) was identified
as containing either 26% or 69% Chrysotile asbestos. This material was observed on
metal duct accessible in the mechanical rooms of each floor. Some duct work was
observed on the floor in the 5th floor hallway. This material was observed to be in poor
condition.
• Grey pipe wrap (homogenous area PW1) was identified as containing 69% Chrysotile
asbestos. This material was observed on the 1st floor in Rooms 500 and 502, as well as
on the floor near the stair landing and elevator lobby. The insulation was also observed
on ceiling pipes in the basement. This material was observed to be in poor condition.
• Boiler insulation (homogenous area BI1) was identified as containing 9% Chrysotile and
20% Amosite asbestos. This material was observed on two large boilers and the pipe
leading to and from the boilers in the basement. This material was observed to be in poor
condition.
B. Non-Friable ACM
Bhate’s inspection identified .non-friable asbestos-containing homogenous materials. These
materials are listed in detail below:
• Grey flashing (homogenous area RF1) and Black flashing (homogenous area RF2) were
identified as containing 19% Chrysotile asbestos. These materials were observed on the
roof parapet and were observed to be in poor condition.
• Exterior window caulk (homogenous area WC1) was identified as containing either 2%
or 4% Chrysotile asbestos. This material was observed on the exterior windows of the
building and was observed to be in poor condition.
• Various colors of 9-inch by 9-inch floor tile and associated black mastics were
identified as having asbestos content ranging from 4% to 12% Chrysotile asbestos.
Associated homogenous areas include FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4, FT6, FT7, FT8, and FT9.
These materials were observed on the south end of the 6th floor, two offices (Room 4 and
10) on the 4th floor, Rooms 500 and 502 on the 1st floor, Room 1825 on the 1st floor, and
in the basement. These materials were noted to be in poor condition.
• Black mastic associated with 12-inch by 12-inch tan floor tile (homogenous area FT5)
was identified as containing 9% Chrysotile asbestos. This floor tile was observed on the
first floor in Room 504. The associated floor tile appeared to be in poor condition.
C. Non ACM
Test procedures did not detect asbestos in the remaining samples obtained from the subject site.
% Lead
Sample No. Sample Location Substrate Paint Color Condition
Concentration
Penthouse
10th Floor
7th Floor
6th Floor
% Lead
Sample No. Sample Location Substrate Paint Color Condition
Concentration
5th Floor
Plaster with
LBP-16 Ceiling – Room 5 White Poor 0.018 %
texture
4th Floor
3rd Floor
Bright green /
LBP-19 Interior wall – Room 6 Plaster Poor 0.51 %
blue
1st Floor
% Lead
Sample No. Sample Location Substrate Paint Color Condition
Concentration
The sample results having a lead content equal to or greater than 0.5% by weight lead, as
measured by Flame Absorption Analysis Technique, are identified as positive (i.e. lead-based
paint). Sample locations are included in the figures included as Appendix C.
Based on the results, 18 of 30 the samples collected contain regulated amounts of lead. It should
be noted that not all paint surfaces were sampled for lead-based paint during this survey.
8 ESTIMATION OF QUANTITIES
The following information consists of the estimated size of each asbestos-containing area and
lead-based paint coated area based on observations made by Bhate during the January 24 and 25,
2011, sampling event. The quantities presented below are an approximation based on materials
that were visible and accessible at the time of the site visit. Materials that were hidden behind
walls, above ceilings, or in concealed pipe chases are not included in the estimated
quantities provided. The “approximate areas” column below denotes the approximate size of
the room in which the asbestos-containing materials were identified or the observed quantity of
the material.
Homogenous Approximate
Type of Material Material Locations Friable
Area Areas
Asbestos Quantities
RF1 and RF2 Black and grey flashing Roof Parapet Category I 500 linear feet
Miscellaneous floor
FD1 and FD2 Throughout building Friable 50,000 square feet
debris
Wall and ceilings of Floors 2
TC1 and WT1 Wall and ceiling texture Friable 30,000 square feet
through 8
Pipe chases, above ceilings
PI1 and PI2 Pipe insulation Friable 2,500 linear feet
and in basement
6th floor, 4th floor, and 3rd floor
FT1, FT2, FT3,
Various floor tiles and offices; First floor all former
FT4, FT6, FT7, Category I 2,500 square feet
black mastics store / office areas, and the
FT8, and FT9
basement
Pipe chases, on floor on 1st
Pipe elbows, pipe floor hall and Room 500, at 15 Elbows and
PW1 and AC1 Friable
wraps, and joints spiral stair case in Room 1825, joints
and in basement
White and cream duct On all floors - metal duct work
DT1 and DT2 Friable 250 linear feet
tape in mechanical rooms
2 boilers
BI1 Boiler insulation Basement Friable
(1,200 square feet)
Homogenous Approximate
Type of Material Material Locations Friable
Area Areas
10 CURRENT REGULATIONS
10.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
It is our understanding that the subject structure is planned to be renovated. Test procedures
identified various floor tiles and associated mastics, textured material on ceiling and wall plaster,
debris on the floors, boiler insulation, duct tape, pipe and pipe elbow insulation, window caulk,
and roof flashing that will require abatement prior to the renovated of the structure.
Current regulations require removal of ACMs from facilities that conduct activities that can
damage or disturb ACMs. These activities include renovation or demolition work. When
disturbing in-place asbestos, OSHA asbestos regulations (29 CFR 1910 and 1926) and the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) asbestos regulations (40
CFR Part 61, Subpart M), should be followed.
NESHAPS (40 CFR Part M, Amended 20 November 1990) regulates the removal and disposal
of ACM. This regulation separates ACM into three categories based on the material’s friability
and/or physical condition:
• Regulated ACM (RACM)
• Category I nonfriable ACM
• Category II nonfriable ACM
Category I nonfriable ACM includes gaskets, valve packings, resilient vinyl floor covering (floor
tile and linoleum), and asphalt roofing material containing more than one percent asbestos by
volume. Category II nonfriable ACM is any other nonfriable material with more than one
percent asbestos by volume. An example of a Category II nonfriable material would be asbestos-
cement board (transite). Regulated ACM includes:
• Friable ACM
• Category I nonfriable ACM that has become friable
• Category I nonfriable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting,
or abrading
• Category II nonfriable ACM that has a high probability of becoming friable or can be
rendered friable by the forces expected to act on the material during demolition activities
By EPA definition, regulated ACMs must be abated by a licensed abatement contractor prior to
any activities which will disturb the materials (such as renovation or demolition) are to occur.
10.2 Lead-Based Paint
Bhate's inspection identified several regulated LBP coatings at the subject site that were in poor
condition.
The primary regulatory agencies that govern LBP are the EPA, OSHA, and HUD. The federal
government has established regulatory compliance rules for the disposition of lead-based paint,
which is paint with a lead content equal to or greater than 0.5% lead by weight or 5,000 mg/kg as
defined by Title X of the 1992 Housing and Community Development Act.
EPA regulations establish training requirements (40 CFR Part 745) for anyone conducting
removal activities as well as disclosure requirements and disposal criteria (classification of
waste, 40 CFR Part 261).
OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62) establish worker protection criteria by establishing an
airborne lead action level (30 µg/m3) and a permissible exposure level (50 µg/m3) averaged over
an 8-hour period. OSHA regulations also require that an exposure assessment be conducted
prior to the disturbance of lead-based paint to evaluate and determine if any employee may be
exposed to lead at or above the action level.
The HUD regulations establish disclosure requirements (24 CFR Part 35) and guidelines for the
evaluation and control of lead-based paint hazards in housing.
th
1608
13
Avenue
South,
Suite
300
Birmingham,
Alabama
35205
205-‐918-‐4000
Phone
•
205-‐918-‐4050
Fax
1-‐800-‐806-‐4001
•
www.bhate.com
ASBESTOS
ABATEMENT
RAMSAY-‐MCCORMACK
BUILDING
TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATIONS
Certification
PART 1 - GENERAL
A. Bhate
conducted
a
Limited
Hazardous
Survey
of
the
subject
site
on
January
24
and
25,
2011.
These
specifications
are
based
on
the
findings
of
that
survey,
provided
under
separate
cover.
1.2 BACKGROUND
A. The
subject
site
consists
of
one
parcel
of
land
developed
with
the
Ramsay-‐McCormack
Building.
The
Ramsay-‐McCormack
Building
(built
in
1929
and
renovated
in
1970)
is
a
ten-‐story
office
building
with
a
basement
and
a
mechanical
penthouse.
The
structure
has
been
vacant
since
1986.
The
building
is
in
severe
disrepair
caused
by
neglect,
weathering,
and
vandalism.
The
structure
is
constructed
of
a
cast-‐in-‐place
concrete
frame
with
perimeter
columns
and
one
row
of
interior
supports.
The
frame
is
filled
in
with
structural
clay
tile
walls
and
clad
in
beige
brick.
The
ground
floor
is
trimmed
with
brown
granite
and
terra
cotta.
The
roof
parapet
is
also
accented
with
terra
cotta.
The
interior
of
the
structure
is
divided
by
floors.
The
ground
floor
is
divided
into
several
former
office/store
spaces,
which
at
one
time
included
a
bank,
several
law
and
doctor
offices
and
a
pharmacy.
Floors
2
through
10
have
similar
interior
designs
and
are
divided
into
offices
with
a
central
hallway.
Each
floor
has
restrooms
and
a
mechanical
room.
Interior
finishes
for
the
structure
include
ceramic
tile,
terrazzo
tile,
marble
wall
tile,
drywall,
plaster,
textured
wall
and
ceiling
material,
carpet,
and
various
types
of
floor
tile
and
paint
coated
surfaces.
At
the
time
of
the
survey,
the
basement
of
the
structure
was
flooded
with
approximately
one
foot
of
water.
Two
large
insulated
boilers
were
observed
in
the
basement.
Several
insulated
pipe
runs
were
visible
in
the
basement
and
were
identified
on
all
floors
in
pipe
chases.
Also,
other
unidentified
insulated
pipes,
leading
from
the
basement
boiler
system
were
observed
running
along
the
basement
ceiling
and
may
be
hidden
inside
the
walls
of
all
floors.
It
should
be
noted
that
the
building
is
in
a
dilapidated
and
unsafe
condition.
Fallen
building
material
debris
was
observed
in
several
locations
throughout
the
subject
building.
Also,
due
to
the
condition
of
th
the
building,
not
all
areas
could
be
evaluated
for
suspect
material.
After
sampling
of
the
10 floor,
a
th
portion
of
the
staircase
leading
to
the
10
floor
fell
making
upper
levels
inaccessible.
B. Based
on
the
sampling
survey,
roof
flashing;
thermal
system
insulation
including
pipe
insulation,
pipe
wrap,
boiler
insulation,
and
duct
tape;
window
caulk;
textured
wall
and
ceiling
material;
floor
tile
and
mastic;
and
debris
observed
on
the
floor
were
identified
as
asbestos-‐containing
materials
(ACMs)
that
will
require
abatement
prior
to
activities
that
may
disturb
them.
C. A
summary
of
the
types
of
ACM
and
locations
where
they
were
observed
is
included
in
Section
1.6
of
this
Specification
for
general
purposes
only.
Contractors
should
not
use
this
ACM
summary
as
a
sole
source
for
their
abatement
bids.
This
project
will
include
abatement
of
all
asbestos-‐containing
material
(ACM)
prior
to
the
selective
demolition
project.
If
additional
suspect
ACM
is
found
during
asbestos
abatement
activities,
the
Contractor
shall
inform
the
Owner’s
Representative
for
further
testing
and
guidance.
All
ACM
and
any
asbestos-‐contaminated
material
shall
be
removed
and
disposed
of
as
Regulated
ACM
(RACM).
The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
independently
estimating
quantities
of
all
ACM
to
be
removed.
1.3 SUMMARY
A. The
intent
of
asbestos
abatement
is
to
remove
and
dispose
of
all
ACM
in
a
safe
and
controlled
manner
prior
to
renovation
or
demolition
to
protect
the
workers,
the
occupants,
the
public
of
the
adjacent
properties,
and
the
environment.
B. If
additional
suspect
ACM
is
found
during
asbestos
abatement
activities,
the
Contractor
shall
inform
the
Owner’s
Representative
for
further
testing
and
guidance.
A. The
Contractor
shall
furnish
all
labor,
equipment,
materials,
worker
training,
transportation,
and
disposal,
and
is
responsible
for
costs,
fees,
licenses,
and
permits
related
to
handling
and
disposal
of
asbestos-‐containing
materials
(ACMs).
All
work
shall
be
accomplished
in
strict
adherence
to
the
Specification,
and
applicable
federal,
State,
and
local
regulations.
B. The
Contractor
is
to
be
responsible
for
the
formal
notification
of
the
Engineer
with
the
proper
submittal
information
prior
to
mobilization
on
site
of
any
crew
for
the
purpose
of
abatement.
Such
notification
shall
be
made
in
writing
via
hard
copy
by
mail,
email
or
fax
to
the
Engineer.
Once
this
information
is
received
and
verified
to
be
complete,
the
Engineer
will
forward
an
approval
to
begin
the
abatement
process
at
the
site
in
the
form
of
a
“Notice
to
Proceed
with
the
Abatement”
letter
addressed
to
the
Contractor.
The
Contractor
is
not
to
proceed
with
any
abatement
until
the
“Notice
to
Proceed
with
the
Abatement”
has
been
issued
by
the
Engineer.
C. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
contracting
with
an
appropriate
recycling/disposal
company(s),
and
is
responsible
for
costs
related
to
handling,
transportation,
recycling/disposal,
and
recordkeeping
for
these
special
wastes.
The
Contractor
shall
furnish
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative
a
copy
of
the
waste
manifest
prior
to
shipment
of
waste
or
recyclable
materials.
A. The
Contractor
is
expected
to
carefully
examine
the
site
of
the
proposed
work,
specifications,
and
contract
forms.
The
Contractor
shall
satisfy
himself
as
to
the
character,
quality,
and
quantities
of
work
to
be
performed,
materials
to
be
furnished,
and
as
to
the
requirements
of
the
contract.
B. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
compliance
with
all
current
requirements
for
removal
and
disposal
of
all
ACM
from
the
building.
In
addition,
any
suspect
ACM
that
was
hidden
or
inaccessible
at
the
time
the
survey
was
conducted
must
be
abated
and
disposed
of
within
the
scope
of
this
project
and
should
be
anticipated
in
the
bid.
C. The
Contractor
must
visually
inspect
the
structure
to
become
familiar
with
the
site
conditions.
No
change
orders
will
be
issued
due
to
lack
of
knowledge
of
the
site
conditions.
The
Contractor
shall
review
available
drawings
and
asbestos
sampling
information
to
be
familiar
with
the
location
of
ACM
at
the
structure
and
to
estimate
the
quantity
of
ACM
to
be
removed.
The
Contractor
shall
ensure
ACM
is
removed
prior
to
conducting
renovation
activities
that
may
render
the
ACM
friable
or
subject
the
ACM
to
pulverizing
forces.
D. The
quantities
of
identified
ACM
at
the
subject
building
shall
be
estimated
and
verified
by
the
Contractor
for
bidding
purposes.
E. The
asbestos
abatement
work
must
be
completed
and
each
work
area
must
pass
the
appropriate
clearance
inspection
prior
to
work
being
performed
by
other
trade
contractors
in
the
renovation
process.
F. Hazardous
Materials:
During
asbestos
abatement
work,
removal
of
ceiling
and
walls
may
be
required.
The
contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
removal
of
and
disposal
of
light
fixtures
within
asbestos
abatement
work
areas.
1. Fluorescent
light
fixture
ballasts
are
known
to
contain
oil
with
polychlorinated
biphenyls
(PCBs).
Light
fixtures
demolished
during
the
work
shall
be
checked
for
the
presence
of
PCB
ballasts.
All
ballasts
that
are
not
clearly
labeled
“NO-‐PCBs”
shall
be
considered
as
containing
PCBs
and
handled
appropriately.
2. Fluorescent
light
fixture
light
bulbs
contain
mercury
and
mercury
vapors.
Bulbs
are
to
be
collected
without
breakage
for
recycling.
3. Mercury
controller
switches,
such
as
those
associated
with
HVAC
equipment,
may
be
encountered
and
shall
be
handled
appropriately
without
breakage
by
recycling.
G. The
schedule
of
work
for
this
project
shall
be
coordinated
with
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
The
Contractor
will
provide
a
detailed
work
schedule
prior
to
start
of
any
work.
Any
changes
to
this
schedule
shall
be
reported
to
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
A. Based
on
the
limited
sampling
survey
performed
by
Bhate
in
January
2011
(under
separate
cover),
friable
and
non-‐friable
asbestos-‐containing
materials
were
identified
at
the
subject
site
and
will
require
abatement.
All
Contractors
submitting
a
bid
for
abatement
and
disposal
of
these
materials
must
visit
the
subject
site
and
estimate
the
quantity
of
ACM
onsite.
Table
1.6.1
presents
a
summary
of
the
ACM
and
the
locations
of
the
asbestos
identified
during
the
inspection.
Table
1.6.1
-‐
Locations
of
Identified
ACMs
Homogeneous
1
Material
Type
Material
Location
Friable
Quantities
Area
ID
Roof
flashing
on
parapet
RF1
and
RF2
Roof
Category
I
500
LF
wall
B. It
should
be
noted
that
the
building
is
in
a
dilapidated
and
unsafe
condition.
Fallen
building
material
debris
was
observed
in
several
locations
throughout
the
subject
building.
Also,
due
to
the
condition
of
th
the
building,
not
all
areas
could
be
evaluated
for
suspect
material.
After
sampling
of
the
10 floor,
a
th
portion
of
the
staircase
leading
to
the
10
floor
fell
making
upper
levels
inaccessible.
C. The
schedule
of
work
for
this
project
shall
be
coordinated
with
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
The
Contractor
will
provide
a
detailed
work
schedule
prior
to
start
of
any
work.
Any
changes
to
this
schedule
shall
be
reported
to
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
D. The Contractor shall comply with all minimum security requirements as required by the Owner.
1.7 REGULATIONS
A. All
applicable
federal,
State,
and
local
laws
and
regulations
concerning
environmental
pollution
control,
asbestos
abatement,
and
structure
demolition,
as
well
as
the
specific
requirements
stated
elsewhere
in
the
Contract
Documents,
shall
be
complied
with.
The
Contractor
shall
be
familiar
with
the
following
applicable
codes
and
regulations.
The
most
recent
issue
of
each
document
shall
govern.
Where
conflict
exists
among
various
requirements
or
with
these
specifications,
the
more
stringent
requirements
shall
apply.
1. TITLE
29,
CODE
OF
FEDERAL
REGULATIONS
(CFR),
U.S.
DEPARTMENT
OF
LABOR,
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY
AND
HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(OSHA)
STANDARDS.
a. Part
1910.20
Access
to
Employee
Exposure
and
Medical
Records
b. Part
1910.134
Respiratory
Protection
c. Part
1926.21
Safety
Training
and
Education
d. Part
1926.59
Hazard
Communication
e. Part
1926.1101
Asbestos
2. TITLE
40,
CFR,
U.S.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
(EPA)
STANDARDS.
a. Part
61,
Subpart
A
National
Emissions
Standard
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
-‐
General
Provisions
b. Part
61,
Subpart
M
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
-‐
National
Emission
Standard
for
Asbestos
A. The
Contractor
shall
hold
all
current
licenses
as
required
by
State
of
Alabama
including
a
General
Contractor’s
license
if
necessary.
A. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
obtaining
all
the
necessary
permits
at
their
own
expense
from
the
City
of
Birmingham
Building
and
Inspections
Department
within
ten
(10)
days
after
the
notice
to
proceed
pursuant
to
asbestos
removal,
structural
demolition,
hauling,
and
disposal.
Further,
the
Contractor
shall
provide
timely
notification
at
their
own
expense
of
asbestos
removal,
structural
demolition,
hauling,
and
disposal
as
may
be
required
by
federal,
State,
regional,
and
local
authorities.
B. Prior
to
commencement
of
asbestos
abatement
work,
the
Contractor
shall
send
appropriate
written
notice
of
the
proposed
abatement
work
to
the
agencies
and
offices
listed
below
as
a
minimum.
Mr.
Craig
Tucker
Air
Pollution
Program
Jefferson
County
Department
of
Health
P.O.
Box
2648
Birmingham,
Alabama
35202-‐2648
Phone:
205-‐930-‐1587
Craig.tucker@jcdh.org
Mr.
Richard
Pigford
Architecture
Works
130
19th
Street
South
Birmingham,
Alabama
35233
Phone:
205-‐320-‐0880
rpigford@architectureworks.com
C. Notification
to
the
Jefferson
County
Department
of
Health
must
be
submitted
on
the
"Notification
of
Demolition
and
Renovation"
form.
The
notice
shall
be
received
by
each
party
at
least
10
working
days
prior
to
the
start
of
asbestos
abatement
work.
D. Notify
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative
a
minimum
of
24-‐hours
prior
to
the
date
the
Work
is
to
commence.
Such
notification
may
be
by
telephone
or
email.
Notification
shall
reference
the
work
schedule.
E. Notify
the
Engineer
of
all
air
monitoring
results
within
24-‐hours
of
sampling
completion.
Such
notification
may
be
by
telephone,
email,
or
FAX.
The
notification
shall
reference
the
work
area
identification,
sample
results,
and
other
pertinent
information.
F. Provide
written
notification
of
schedule
changes
or
any
changes
in
the
inspection
findings
to
the
agencies
and
offices
requiring
notification
under
this
Section.
G. Upon
completion
of
the
asbestos
removal,
submit
notification
of
project
completion
to
the
agencies
and
offices
requiring
notification
under
this
Section.
1.10 DEFINITIONS
A. The
following
commonly
used
terms
are
defined
in
the
context
of
these
specifications.
1. Abatement:
Procedures
to
control
or
decrease
fiber
release
from
asbestos-‐containing
building
materials
or
insulation
material
containing
asbestos.
Includes
removal,
enclosure,
and
encapsulation.
2. Adequately
Wet:
A
term
as
defined
in
CFR
40
Part
61,
Subpart
M
and
EPA
340/1-‐90-‐019
that
means
to
sufficiently
mix
or
penetrate
with
liquid
to
prevent
the
release
of
particulates.
If
visible
emissions
are
observed
coming
from
asbestos-‐containing
material
(ACM),
then
that
material
has
not
been
adequately
wetted.
However,
the
absence
of
visible
emissions
is
not
sufficient
evidence
of
being
adequately
wetted.
3. Air
Filtration
Device
(AFD):
A
portable
local
exhaust
system
equipped
with
HEPA
filtration,
capable
of
maintaining
a
constant
low
velocity
air
flow
into
contaminated
areas
from
adjacent,
uncontaminated
areas
and
capable
of
maintaining
a
negative
air
pressure
with
respect
to
the
adjacent,
uncontaminated
areas.
4. Air
Lock:
A
system
for
permitting
ingress
or
egress
to
the
work
area
while
permitting
minimal
air
movement
between
a
contaminated
area
and
an
uncontaminated
area,
typically
consisting
of
two
curtained
doorways
placed
a
minimum
of
three
feet
apart.
5. Air
Monitoring:
The
process
of
measuring
the
fiber
content
of
a
specific
volume
of
air
in
a
stated
period
of
time.
Personal
air
sampling
results
shall
be
calculated
to
reflect
the
employee's
eight
hour
time
weighted
average
(TWA)
exposure.
Area
sampling
results
are
reported
directly,
without
calculating
the
TWA.
6. Air
Monitoring
Specialist
/
Firm:
An
authorized
and
qualified
person
or
firm
contracted
or
employed
by
the
Contractor
to
conduct
air
monitoring.
7. Amended
Water:
Water
to
which
a
surfactant
has
been
added
to
decrease
the
surface
tension
to
35
or
less
dynes.
8. Asbestos:
The
asbestiform
varieties
of
serpentine
(chrysotile),
riebeckite
(crocidolite),
cummingtonite-‐grunerite
(amosite),
anthophyllite,
and
actinolite-‐tremolite.
For
purposes
of
determining
respiratory
and
worker
protection
both
the
asbestiform
and
non-‐asbestiform
varieties
of
the
above
minerals
and
any
of
these
materials
that
have
been
chemically
treated
and/or
altered
shall
be
considered
as
asbestos.
9. Asbestos-‐Containing
Building
Material
(ACBM):
Surfacing
ACM,
thermal
system
insulation
ACM,
or
miscellaneous
ACM
that
is
found
in
or
on
interior
structural
members
or
other
parts
of
a
building.
10. Asbestos-‐Containing
Material
(ACM):
Any
material
containing
more
than
1%
by
weight
of
asbestos
of
any
type
or
mixture
of
types.
11. Asbestos-‐Containing
Waste
Material:
Any
material
which
is
or
is
suspected
of
being
or
any
material
contaminated
with
an
asbestos-‐containing
material
which
is
to
be
removed
from
a
work
area
for
disposal.
12. Asbestos
Debris:
Pieces
of
ACBM
that
can
be
identified
by
color,
texture,
or
composition,
or
means
dust
if
determined
by
an
accredited
inspector
to
be
ACM.
13. Asbestos
Removal
Encapsulant:
A
chemical
solution
used
in
place
of
amended
water
during
asbestos
removal
to
penetrate,
bind,
and
encapsulate
the
asbestos-‐containing
material.
14. Authorized
Visitor:
The
Owner
or
the
Owner’s
Representatives
or
representatives
of
any
regulatory
or
other
agency
having
jurisdiction
over
the
project.
15. Barrier:
Any
surface
that
seals
off
the
work
area
to
inhibit
the
movement
of
air.
16. Breathing
Zone:
A
hemisphere
forward
of
the
shoulders
with
a
radius
of
approximately
6
to
9
inches.
17. Class
I
Asbestos
Work:
Work
as
defined
by
OSHA
in
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101(b)
as
being
activities
involving
the
removal
of
thermal
system
insulation
(TSI)
and
surfacing
asbestos-‐
containing
material
(ACM)
and
presumed
asbestos-‐containing
material
(PACM).
18. Class
II
Asbestos
Work:
Work
as
defined
by
OSHA
in
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101(b)
as
being
activities
involving
the
removal
of
ACM
which
is
not
TSI
or
surfacing
material.
This
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to,
the
removal
of
asbestos-‐containing
wallboard,
floor
tile
and
sheeting,
asphaltic
roofing,
asbestos
cement
roofing
and
siding
shingles,
and
construction
mastics
19. Competent
Person:
Definition
and
responsibilities
as
set
down
in
29
CFR
1926.1101(b)
and
as
outlined
herein.
One
who
is
capable
of
identifying
existing
asbestos
hazards
and
selecting
the
appropriate
control
strategy
for
asbestos
exposure,
who
has
the
authority
to
take
prompt
corrective
measures
to
eliminate
them,
as
specified
in
29
CFR
1926.32(f),
and
for
Class
I
and
Class
II
work
who
is
specially
trained
in
a
training
course
which
meets
the
criteria
of
EPA’s
Model
Accreditation
Plan
(40
CFR
763)
for
supervisor,
or
its
equivalent.
20. Critical
Seal:
An
airtight
seal
that
covers
openings
along
the
perimeter
walls,
ceiling
and
floor
of
the
work
area.
The
critical
seals
consist
of
one
layer
of
reinforced
fire-‐retardant
plastic
sheeting
that
covers
each
opening.
Critical
seals
are
established
prior
to
plasticizing
the
work
area.
21. Curtained
Doorway:
A
device
to
allow
ingress
or
egress
from
one
room
to
another
while
permitting
minimal
air
movement
between
the
rooms.
22. Decontamination
Enclosure
System:
A
series
of
connected
rooms
for
the
decontamination
of
workers
(a
Personnel
Decontamination
Enclosure
System)
or
of
materials
and
equipment
(Equipment
Decontamination
Enclosure
System).
23. Differential
Air
Pressure
Recording
Device:
A
device
capable
of
producing
a
continual
strip
record,
in
increments
of
0.001
inches
of
water
of
the
pressure
differential
between
the
containment
area
(work
area)
and
the
ambient
air
pressure.
24. Disposal
Bags:
Properly
labeled
6
mil
thick
leak-‐tight
plastic
bags
used
for
transporting
asbestos
waste
from
regulated
area
to
the
disposal
site.
25. Engineer:
The
Owner’s
Representative
who
is
authorized
to
exercise
general
administration
and
supervision
of
the
work
under
the
direction
of
the
Owner.
26. Equipment
Decontamination
Enclosure
System:
A
decontamination
system
for
waste
materials
and
equipment,
typically
consisting
of
a
designated
area
of
the
work
area,
a
washroom,
and
a
holding
area,
with
an
air
lock
between
any
two
adjacent
rooms
and
a
curtained
doorway
between
the
holding
area
and
the
non-‐work
area.
Not
to
be
used
for
personnel
entry/exit.
27. Excursion
Limit:
No
employee
shall
be
exposed
to
an
airborne
concentration
of
asbestos
in
excess
of
1.0
f/cc
of
air
as
averaged
over
a
sampling
period
of
30
minutes.
28. Fixed
Object:
A
unit
of
equipment
or
furniture
in
the
work
area,
which
cannot
be
removed
from
the
work
area.
29. Friable
ACM:
A
term
as
defined
in
CFR
40
Part
61,
Subpart
M
and
EPA
340/1-‐90-‐018
that
means
any
material
containing
more
than
1
percent
asbestos
as
determined
using
the
method
specified
in
CFR
40
Part
763,
Appendix
A,
Subpart
F,
Section
1,
Polarized
Light
Microscopy,
that
when
dry,
can
be
crumbled,
pulverized,
or
reduced
to
powder
by
hand
pressure.
30. Full
Facepiece
High
Efficiency
Respirator
(FFHER):
A
respirator
which
covers
the
wearer's
entire
face
from
the
hairline
to
below
the
chin
and
which
is
equipped
with
a
HEPA
filter.
31. Half
Mask
High
Efficiency
Respirator
(HMHER):
A
respirator
which
covers
one
half
of
the
wearer's
face,
from
the
bridge
of
the
nose
to
below
the
chin,
and
is
equipped
with
HEPA
filters.
32. HEPA
Filter:
A
High
Efficiency
Particulate
Air
(HEPA)
filter
capable
of
trapping
and
retaining
99.97%
of
asbestos
fibers
0.3
microns
in
diameter.
33. HEPA
Vacuum
Equipment:
High
efficiency
particulate
air
(HEPA)
filtered
vacuuming
equipment
having
an
Underwriters
Laboratories,
Inc.
(UL)
586
filter
system
capable
of
collecting
and
retaining
asbestos
fibers.
34. Lockdown:
Procedure
of
applying
an
encapsulant
as
a
protective
coating
or
sealant
to
a
surface
from
which
ACM
has
been
removed
in
order
to
control
and
minimize
airborne
asbestos
fiber
generation
that
might
result
from
residual
asbestos-‐containing
debris.
35. Movable
Object:
A
unit
of
equipment
or
furniture
which
can
be
removed
from
the
work
area.
36. Negative
Initial
Exposure
Assessment:
A
demonstration
by
the
employer
that
employee
exposure
during
an
operation
is
expected
to
be
consistently
below
the
permissible
exposure
limit
(PEL).
37. Negative
Pressure
Respirator:
A
respirator
in
which
the
air
pressure
inside
the
respiratory-‐inlet
covering
is
positive
during
exhalation
in
relation
to
the
air
pressure
of
the
outside
atmosphere
and
negative
during
inhalation
in
relation
to
the
air
pressure
of
the
outside
atmosphere.
38. Permissible
Exposure
Limits
(PELs):
PELs
shall
be
as
determined
using
the
Sampling
and
Analytical
Procedure
as
promulgated
in
29
CFR
1926.1101,
Appendix
A.
39. Personal
Monitoring:
Sampling
of
the
asbestos
fiber
concentrations
within
the
breathing
zone
of
an
employee.
40. Personnel
Decontamination
Enclosure
System:
A
decontamination
system
for
personnel
and
limited
equipment,
typically
consisting
of
an
equipment
room,
shower
room,
and
clean
room,
with
an
air
lock
between
any
two
adjacent
rooms,
and
a
curtained
doorway
between
the
equipment
room
and
the
work
area,
and
a
curtained
doorway
between
the
clean
room
and
the
non-‐work
area.
The
decontamination
system
serves
as
the
only
entrance/exit
for
the
work
area.
41. Plasticize:
To
cover
floors
and
walls
with
plastic
sheeting
as
herein
specified.
42. Powered
Air
Purifying
Respirator
(PAPR):
Either
a
full
facepiece,
helmet,
or
hooded
respirator
that
powers
breathing
air
to
the
wearer
after
the
air
has
been
purified
through
a
HEPA
filter.
43. Pressure
Differential
and
Ventilation
System:
A
local
exhaust
system,
utilizing
HEPA
filtration
capable
of
maintaining
a
pressure
differential
with
the
inside
of
the
Work
Area
at
a
lower
pressure
than
any
adjacent
area,
and
which
cleans
recirculated
air
or
generates
a
constant
air
flow
from
adjacent
areas
into
the
Work
Area.
44. Protection
Factor:
The
ratio
of
the
ambient
concentration
of
an
airborne
substance
to
the
concentration
of
the
substance
inside
the
respirator
at
the
breathing
zone
of
the
wearer.
The
protection
factor
is
a
measure
of
the
degree
of
protection
provided
by
a
respirator
to
the
wearer.
45. RACM:
Means
“regulated
asbestos-‐containing
material”
to
include:
a)
friable
asbestos
material;
b)
Category
I
non-‐friable
ACM
that
has
become
friable;
c)
Category
I
non-‐friable
ACM
that
will
be
or
has
been
subjected
to
sanding,
grinding,
cutting,
or
abrading,
or;
d)
Category
II
non-‐friable
ACM
that
has
a
high
probability
of
becoming
or
has
become
crumbled,
pulverized,
or
reduced
to
powder
by
the
forces
expected
to
act
on
the
material
in
the
course
of
demolition
or
renovation
operations.
46. Regulated
Area:
Area
established
by
the
employer
to
demarcate
areas
where
Class
II
asbestos
work
is
conducted,
and
any
adjoining
area
where
debris
and
waste
from
such
asbestos
work
accumulates.
Requirements
for
regulated
areas
are
set
out
in
29
CFR
1926.1101(e).
47. Removal:
The
act
of
removing
and
transporting
asbestos-‐containing
or
asbestos-‐contaminated
materials
from
the
work
area
to
a
suitable
disposal
site.
48. Surfactant:
A
chemical
wetting
agent
added
to
water
to
improve
penetration,
thus
reducing
the
quantity
of
water
required
for
a
given
operation
or
area.
49. Thermal
System
Insulation
(TSI):
ACM
applied
to
pipes,
fittings,
boilers,
breeching,
tanks,
ducts
or
other
structural
components
to
prevent
heat
loss
or
gain.
50. Time
Weighted
Average
(TWA):
The
average
concentration
of
a
contaminant
in
air
during
a
specific
time
period.
51. Time
Weighted
Average
Limit:
No
employee
shall
be
exposed
to
an
airborne
concentration
of
asbestos
in
excess
of
0.1
fiber
per
cubic
centimeter
(f/cc)
of
air
as
an
eight
(8)
hour
time
weighted
average
(TWA).
52. Wet
Cleaning:
The
process
of
eliminating
asbestos
contamination
from
building
surfaces
and
objects
by
using
cloths,
mops,
or
other
cleaning
tools
which
have
been
dampened
with
amended
water
or
asbestos
removal
encapsulant
and
by
afterwards
disposing
of
these
cleaning
tools
as
asbestos-‐contaminated
waste.
53. Work
Area:
Designated
rooms,
spaces,
or
areas
of
the
project
where
asbestos
abatement
actions
are
to
be
undertaken
or
which
may
become
contaminated
as
a
result
of
such
abatement
actions.
A
Contained
Work
Area
has
been
sealed,
plasticized,
and
equipped
with
a
decontamination
enclosure
system.
A
Non-‐Contained
Work
Area
is
an
isolated
or
controlled-‐access
area
which
has
not
been
plasticized.
3. The
Contractor
shall
coordinate
the
work
schedule
with
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
4. An
area
will
be
designated
for
staging
of
the
Contractor’s
equipment
during
mobilization,
load-‐
out
and
demobilization
only.
Use
of
other
areas
is
prohibited.
The
location
and
extent
of
the
staging
area
will
be
determined
by
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative
during
the
pre-‐
construction
meeting.
D. Daily
Meetings
1. The
Contractor
shall
conduct
a
weekly
site
operations
meeting
for
each
day
he
works
onsite
at
a
time
and
location
agreed
upon
with
the
Engineer
and
Owner’s
Representative.
The
Contractor
shall
discuss
the
progress
of
the
work
and
coordinate
his
daily
work
schedule
with
the
Engineer
and
Owner’s
Representative.
A. Project
Documentation
1. The
Contractor
shall
maintain
on
the
project
site
a
daily
log
documenting
the
dates
and
times
of
the
following:
a. Meetings:
purpose,
attendees,
brief
discussion.
b. Personnel,
by
name
and
social
security
number
(or
alternate
unique
identifier),
entering
and
leaving
the
work
area.
c. Special
or
unusual
events,
equipment
failures,
accidents.
d. Air
monitoring
tests
and
test
results
(OSHA
compliance
monitoring
performed
during
the
work).
e. Removal
of
waste
materials
from
the
work
area.
f. Inspections
and
release
of
the
work
area
for
re-‐occupancy.
1) Daily
Logs,
2) Special
Reports,
3) Inspection
Certifications,
4) Air
Monitoring
results,
5) Waste
Disposal
Receipts,
and
6) Daily
Work
Area
Strip
Charts,
if
applicable.
C. Special
Reports
1. If
an
accident,
personal
injury
or
an
event
of
unusual
and
significant
nature
occurs
at
site
the
Contractor
shall
prepare
and
submit
a
special
report
listing
the
chain
of
events,
persons
participating,
response
by
the
Contractor's
personnel,
and
similar
pertinent
information.
2. If
an
unusual
condition
is
discovered
during
the
work,
prepare
and
submit
a
report
indicating
the
condition
discovered.
3. If
hazardous
conditions,
hazardous
materials
or
hazardous
wastes
are
unexpectedly
uncovered
during
the
work,
the
Contractor
shall
stop
all
work
in
connection
with
such
hazardous
conditions
and
immediately
notify
the
Engineer.
Submit
a
report
indicating
the
condition
discovered
and
details
of
the
actions
taken
as
soon
as
possible
but
no
later
than
24
hours.
D. Pre-‐Work
Submittals
1. Provide
three
(3)
copies
of
the
following
submittals
to
the
Engineer
at
least
ten
(10)
days
prior
to
start
of
any
work.
The
Engineer
with
review
the
materials
and
respond
within
three
(3)
working
days
of
receipt.
The
Contractor
must
receive
written
acceptance
of
the
submittals
prior
to
mobilization
to
project
site.
a. Health
and
Safety
Plan:
Written
Health
and
Safety
Plan
addressing
procedures
for
work
place
safety.
Address
how
physical
and
health
hazards
associated
with
the
work
are
identified
and
communicated
to
employees,
and
the
name
of
the
person
responsible
for
implementation
of
the
Health
and
Safety
Plan.
Address
procedures
for
using
scaffolds,
hoists
and
ladders
safely,
electrical
safety
procedures,
and
guidelines
for
protection
from
noise,
heat
stress,
chemical
exposure,
and
trip/fall
hazards.
b. Contingency
Plan:
Written
Emergency
Action
Plan
outlining
the
actions
to
be
performed
for
emergencies
including
fire,
accident,
or
unexpected
asbestos
contamination
in
the
adjacent
site
area
and
on
the
adjoining
grounds.
This
Plan
shall
identify
the
manner
in
which
emergencies
are
announced,
emergency
procedures
and
persons
responsible
for
rescue,
medical
duties,
and
fire
prevention.
c. Work
Plan:
Provide
a
work
plan
indicating
the
sequencing
of
the
removal
activities,
description
of
the
abatement
area
containment
methods,
description
of
the
work
methods
and
removal
procedures
to
be
used,
description
of
the
waste
handling
and
preparation
for
disposal,
location
of
work
area
entrance
and
egress
points,
location
of
decontamination
unit(s),
location
of
air
filtration
devices
(AFDs),
methods
and
locations
of
waste
containment,
conveyance,
and
collection
devices
(i.e.
roll-‐offs)
and
drawings
showing
the
regulated
area.
d. Progress
Schedule:
Schedule
showing
the
order
in
which
the
Contractor
proposes
to
carry
out
the
work,
the
date
he
will
start
work,
and
the
projected
date
of
completion
for
each
work
area,
as
necessary.
The
Contractor
shall
provide
the
specific
hours
the
Contractor
intends
to
work
onsite,
and
the
number
of
personnel
to
work
each
shift.
e. Notifications:
Proof
of
written
pre-‐work
notification
submitted
to
agencies
requiring
notification
under
Paragraph
"Agency
Notifications".
f. Contractor’s
License:
Copies
of
licenses
specific
to
construction/demolition
and
asbestos
abatement
for
the
state
in
which
work
is
to
be
performed.
g. Respirator
Program:
Written
respiratory
protection
program
as
required
by
OSHA
regulations.
Respirator
fit
test
verification
required
for
asbestos
abatement
workers.
h. Employee
Information:
The
contractor
should
provide
the
following
information
for
each
employee
assigned
to
perform
asbestos
abatement
work
at
this
jobsite.
The
information
should
be
arranged
by
employee.
1.
Training
Certificates:
Copies
of
all
supervisor’s
and
workers
training
certificates
and
any
annual
re-‐accreditation
records
which
demonstrate
receipt
of
EPA-‐approved
or
OSHA
mandated
training
courses
required
to
perform
asbestos-‐related
work.
2.
Proof
of
Accreditation:
Copies
of
state
accreditation
(may
be
a
certificate
or
copy
of
card)
3.
Physician
Statement:
Copies
of
current
(within
the
preceding
12
months)
physician
statements
for
each
employee
assigned
to
perform
asbestos
abatement
work
for
this
project
and
to
perform
work
under
respirator
protection
stating
that
employee
can
work
in
a
respirator.
4.
Fit
Test:
Copy
of
proof
of
fit
testing
(must
not
be
older
than
12
months.
5.
Certificate
of
Worker’s
Acknowledgment:
Provide
completed
Worker’s
Acknowledgment
for
each
employee
to
work
onsite
(see
Part
4
for
example
form).
i. Product
Information:
Provide
a
complete
product
list
including
name
of
material
and
the
manufacturer’s
name
for
all
materials
to
be
brought
to
the
site.
Provide
a
Material
Safety
Data
Sheet
(MSDS)
for
materials,
if
applicable.
Provide
additional
information
if
requested.
j. Waste
Handling
and
Disposal:
Written
procedures
for
waste
load-‐out,
temporary
storage,
transportation,
and
location
of
disposal
site.
k. Respiratory
Protection
Justification:
Provide
completed
Respiratory
Protection
Justification
prior
to
beginning
work
(see
Part
5
for
example
form).
2. Engineer
will
review
the
submittal
and
either
accept
the
information
or
notify
the
Contractor
in
writing
of
the
deficiencies
in
the
submittal
within
two
working
days.
Contractor
will
respond
in
a
timely
manner
with
the
requested
revisions
to
the
Engineer.
3. Once
all
submittal
information
is
completed,
the
Engineer
will
issue
a
notice
of
acceptance
of
the
pre-‐work
submittal
and
approval
for
the
Contractor
to
proceed
with
the
contracted
abatement
at
the
designated
locations.
4. Contractor
shall
not
proceed
with
any
abatement
until
the
Engineer
has
reviewed
and
accepted
all
pre-‐work
submittals.
c. OSHA
Monitoring
Results:
Provide
a
copy
of
the
personnel
air
monitoring
results
to
the
Engineer
and
they
shall
be
posted
within
24
hours
of
collection.
d. Air
Monitoring
Results:
Provide
a
copy
of
the
area
air
monitoring
results
to
the
Engineer.
e. Special
Reports
shall
be
submitted
as
soon
as
practicable
following
the
incident.
f. Landfill
Receipt:
Receipts
from
the
landfill
operator
that
acknowledge
delivery
of
material,
shall
be
submitted
within
three
days
following
removal
of
ACM
from
the
structure.
g. Waste
Shipment
Records:
Copy
of
completed
Waste
Shipment
Record
form
and
landfill
receipts.
A. Materials
and
equipment
to
be
furnished
by
the
Contractor
for
the
work
shall
be
installed
according
to
the
manufacturer's
written
instructions.
Provide
the
following
as
required
for
the
project:
1. Barrier:
A
physical
obstruction
that
is
intended
to
prevent
persons
from
accidentally
falling
or
walking
through
floor
openings.
2. Communications
Equipment:
Devices
suitable
for
inter-‐room
communications,
such
as
"walkie-‐talkies"
or
"radio
band"
communicators
shall
be
provided
as
necessary.
3. Disposal
Bags:
Plastic
Disposal
Bags
shall
be
a
minimum
of
six
mils
in
thickness.
Markings
and
labels
on
disposal
bags
and
shipping
containers
shall
bear
danger
labels,
transportation
packaging
marking
and
labels,
and
generator
identification
information.
Markings
and
labels
shall
be
permanently
affixed
to
all
bags
and
shipping
containers
containing
ACM,
in
accordance
with
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101(k)(7),
DOT
Standard
49
CFR
172,
and
EPA
Standard
40
CFR
Part
61.150(a)(1)(v).
4. Duct
Tape:
Duct
tape
shall
be
capable
of
sealing
joints
of
adjacent
sheets
of
plastic
sheeting
and
shall
be
capable
of
adhering
under
both
dry
and
wet
conditions.
Minimum
physical
properties:
adhesion
to
steel
-‐
45
ounces
per
inch
width
(ASTM
D-‐3330);
tensile
strength
at
break
-‐
36
pounds
per
inch
width
(ASTM
D-‐3759);
elongation
at
break
-‐
10%
(ASTM
D-‐3759).
5. Encapsulants:
The
encapsulant
shall
carry
a
Class
"A"
fire
resistance
rating
and
shall
have
an
American
Society
for
Testing
and
Materials
(ASTM)
E-‐162
flame
spread
index
of
15
or
less.
A
tint
shall
be
given
by
the
Contractor
to
the
encapsulant
by
means
of
the
addition
of
non-‐toxic,
nonflammable
colorings
before
application.
The
encapsulant
shall
be
installed
according
to
the
manufacturer's
written
instructions.
6. Fire
Extinguisher:
Type
"ABC"
dry
chemical
extinguisher
or
a
combination
of
several
extinguishers
of
NFPA
recommended
types
for
the
fire
hazard
exposures
in
each
extinguisher
location
shall
be
provided.
Minimum
size
of
extinguisher
shall
be
4A,
and
40B:C.
A
minimum
of
one
extinguisher
shall
be
provided
for
every
1,500
square
feet
of
floor
area,
with
a
maximum
travel
distance
to
an
extinguisher
of
75
feet.
At
least
one
extinguisher
shall
be
provided
in
each
decontamination
enclosure.
The
extinguisher
shall
be
placed
in
the
clean
room.
7. Fire-‐Retardant
Plastic:
Plastic
or
polyethylene
sheet
used
for
general
work
area
plasticizing
shall
be
minimum
6
mil
flame
retardant
plastic
sheeting
that
meets
the
National
Fire
Protection
Association
(NFPA)
701
Large-‐Scale
test
requirements.
8. Foam
Sealant:
Foam
Sealant
shall
be
expanding
urethane
Class
1
foam
sealant
with
a
UL
723
flame
spread
index
of
25
or
less,
smoke
developed
index
of
0,
and
a
minimum
operating
o o
temperature
range
between
-‐100 F
and
250 F.
9. Other
Materials:
All
other
materials,
such
as
lumber,
plywood,
tools,
adhesive,
nails,
hardware,
etc.,
required
to
perform
the
work
described
in
this
section
shall
be
provided.
Materials
and
equipment
shall
be
new
or
used,
uncontaminated
by
asbestos,
in
serviceable
condition,
and
appropriate
for
the
intended
purpose.
10. Plywood:
Plywood
used
for
temporary
partitions
shall
be
minimum
3/8-‐inch
C-‐D
exterior
grade.
11. Scaffolding:
Provide
scaffolding,
ladders
and
or
staging
equipment,
as
necessary
to
accomplish
the
work.
Scaffolding
may
be
of
suspension
type
or
standing
type
such
as
metal
tube
and
coupler,
tubular
welded
frame,
pole
or
outrigger
type
or
cantilever
type.
The
type,
erection
requirements,
and
use
of
scaffolding
shall
comply
with
applicable
OSHA
provisions.
Rungs
of
metal
ladders,
scaffolds,
and
all
surfaces
of
such
equipment
subject
to
foot
traffic
shall
be
equipped
with
a
nonskid
surface.
Temporary
hand
railing
systems
may
need
to
be
installed
on
stairways.
12. Spray
Adhesive:
Spray
Aerosol
Adhesive
shall
be
specially
formulated
to
stick
to
sheet
polyethylene.
The
product
shall
contain
no
methylene
chloride
or
restricted
chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs).
13. Spraying
Equipment:
Equipment
used
to
apply
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
shall
be
of
a
low
pressure
type
to
prevent
disturbance
of
the
asbestos
prior
to
physical
controlled
removal.
Asbestos
encapsulant
shall
be
spray-‐applied
by
an
airless
method.
14. Surfactant:
Surfactant
(Wetting
Agent)
shall
consist
of
resin
materials
in
a
water
base,
which
have
been
tested
to
ensure
materials
are
non-‐toxic
and
non-‐irritating
to
skin
and
eyes.
Surfactant
shall
be
installed
according
to
the
manufacturer's
written
instructions.
15. Temporary
Partitions:
Temporary
partitions
shall
extend
from
the
floor
to
the
ceiling
and
form
an
airtight
seal.
They
shall
be
built
using
wood
or
metal
framing
at
24
inch
on-‐center
faced
with
plywood
sheathing
on
both
sides,
and
shall
be
braced
as
necessary.
Both
sides
of
the
temporary
partition
shall
be
covered
with
a
double
layer
of
6
mil
plastic
sheeting,
with
joints
staggered
and
sealed
with
tape.
Edges
of
the
temporary
partition
at
the
floor,
walls,
and
ceiling
shall
be
taped
and
caulked
airtight.
16. Temporary
Enclosures:
Construct
using
wood,
metal
or
plastic
pipe
framing
with
plastic
sheeting
mounted
on
the
interior
of
the
work
area.
Provide
curtain
doors
for
entrance
into
temporary
enclosures.
17. Visual
Barrier:
Black
plastic
or
similar
opaque
material
to
act
as
a
visual
screen.
Barrier
height
shall
be
6
feet.
Mount
visual
barrier
on
metal
fence
posts.
Provide
warning
signs
on
visual
barrier.
18. Signs:
Warning
Signs
shall
be
posted
at
the
perimeter
of
the
regulated
area
prior
to
abatement
operations
in
accordance
with
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101.
Danger
sign
format
and
color
shall
conform
to
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.200.
The
signs
shall
display
the
legend
indicated
below:
DANGER
ASBESTOS
CANCER
AND
LUNG
DISEASE
HAZARD
AUTHORIZED
PERSONNEL
ONLY
RESPIRATORS
AND
PROTECTIVE
CLOTHING
ARE
REQUIRED
IN
THIS
AREA
19. Warning
signs
shall
be
posted
outside
all
entrances
and
exits
to
the
property,
warning
that
demolition
work
is
being
conducted.
20. Danger
labels
format
and
color
shall
conform
to
29
CFR
1926.200.
Danger
labels
shall
display
the
following
legend/information
in
accordance
with
OSHA
29
CFR
1926.1101(k)(7):
DANGER
CONTAINS
ASBESTOS
FIBERS
AVOID
CREATING
DUST
CANCER
AND
LUNG
DISEASE
HAZARD
21. Generator
identification
information
shall
be
affixed
to
each
package.
DOT
label
format
and
color
shall
conform
to
DOT
Standard
49
CFR
172.304.
Generator
identification
information
labels
shall
display
the
following
legend/information
in
accordance
with
EPA
40
CFR
Part
61.150(a)(1)(v):
GENERATORS
NAME
FACILITY
ADDRESS
22. DOT
Markings
and
Labels:
Markings
and
Labels
shall
be
permanently
affixed
to
all
bags
and
containers
containing
ACM,
in
accordance
with
DOT
49
CFR
172.304
and
172.407.
Markings
shall
display
the
following
text:
RQ,
ASBESTOS,
NA
2212
23. Labels
shall
be
diamond
shape
and
shall
be
located
near
the
marking
text.
Labels
shall
consist
of
a
diamond
a
minimum
of
100
millimeters
(mm)
on
each
side
with
each
side
having
a
solid
line
inner
boarder
5.0
to
6.3
mm
from
the
edge.
The
label
shall
be
white
with
seven
black
vertical
stripes
on
the
top
half.
Black
stripes
and
white
spaces
shall
be
equally
spaced.
The
lower
half
of
the
label
shall
be
white
with
the
class
number
"9"
underlined
and
centered
at
the
bottom.
Refer
to
DOT
40
CFR
172.446
for
label
format.
24. Reuse
of
Containers:
If
impermeable
containers
used
to
transport
bagged
asbestos
waste
to
the
landfill
are
to
be
reused,
the
empty
containers
shall
display
the
following
label:
RESIDUE:
LAST
CONTAINED
ASBESTOS
RQ
2.4 UTILITIES
A. Provide
cutoffs
and/or
temporary
utilities
as
necessary
to
perform
the
asbestos
abatement
work.
Coordinate
all
utility
hook-‐up
and
cutoffs
with
the
Owner.
Use
qualified
tradesmen
for
utility
cutoffs
and
installation
of
temporary
service
when
necessary.
Work
shall
be
performed
in
a
competent
manner
by
qualified
and
appropriately
trained
and
licensed
tradesmen.
1. Electrical
Power:
The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
arranging
and
securing
temporary
electrical
service
from
the
existing
infrastructure
or
providing
for
adequate
onsite
electrical
power
generation
during
the
project
duration.
2. Ground
Fault
Protection:
All
circuits
used
by
the
Contractor
shall
be
equipped
with
ground
fault
circuit
interrupters
(GFCI).
The
Contractor
is
responsible
for
connection
to
a
temporary
panel
and
routing
power
to
his
work
area.
3. Water
Service:
The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
arranging
and
securing
a
temporary
water
source
from
existing
infrastructure
or
shall
provide
adequate
water
storage
and
delivery
mechanisms
on
site
during
the
project
duration.
4. Wastewater:
All
water
used
by
the
Contractor
during
asbestos
abatement
activities
shall
be
collected
when
feasible
and
passed
through
a
water
filtration
system
capable
of
filtering
and
retaining
particles
larger
than
5.0
microns
in
size
prior
to
being
discharged
into
the
sanitary
sewer.
2.5 DECONTAMINATION
A. Provide
adequate
facilities
for
the
decontamination
of
workers.
Decontamination
enclosure
systems
shall
be
placed
adjacent
to
the
work
area
and
shall
be
of
sufficient
size
to
accommodate
the
Contractor's
personnel.
B. Provide
change
rooms
and
shower
facilities
that
comply
with
29
CFR
1910.141(d).
The
decontamination
area
shall
consist
of
an
equipment
room,
shower
area,
and
clean
room
in
series.
1. Construct
a
three
room
structure
using
modular
systems
or
build
using
rigid
plastic
pipe,
metal
or
wood
framing.
Interior
floors,
walls
and
ceiling
shall
be
lined
with
two
layers
of
6
mil
flame
retardant
plastic
sheeting.
Provide
the
following:
equipment
room
for
removal
of
clothing;
shower
room
for
decontamination
of
workers,
and;
clean
room
(change
room)
with
lockers
for
worker
change
of
clothing.
2. The
equipment
room
shall
be
supplied
with
impermeable,
labeled
bags
and
containers
for
the
containment
and
disposal
of
contaminated
protective
equipment.
3. Shower
facilities
provided
shall
comply
with
29
CFR
1910.141(d)(3).
The
showers
shall
be
adjacent
both
to
the
equipment
room
and
the
clean
room.
The
Contractor
shall
ensure
that
workers
perform
proper
decontamination.
4. The
clean
room
shall
be
equipped
with
a
locker
or
appropriate
storage
container
for
each
employee's
use.
C. The
Contractor
shall
ensure
that
workers
enter
and
exit
the
work
area
through
the
decontamination
enclosure
system.
1. All
workers
and
authorized
visitors
shall
enter
the
work
area
through
the
worker
decontamination
enclosure
system.
2. All
workers
shall
sign
the
entry
log,
located
in
the
clean
room,
upon
each
entry
and
exit.
The
log
shall
be
permanently
bound
and
shall
identify
fully
the
facility,
agents,
Contractor(s),
the
project,
each
work
area,
and
respiratory
protection
employed.
3. In
the
clean
room,
remove
and
deposit
street
clothing
within
a
locker
provided
for
their
use,
and
put
on
protective
clothing
and
respiratory
protection
before
leaving
the
clean
room.
4. Before
entering
the
work
area,
the
employer
shall
ensure
that
employees
pass
through
the
equipment
room.
5. Before
leaving
the
work
area,
remove
all
gross
contamination
and
debris
from
protective
clothing.
6. Remove
protective
clothing
in
the
equipment
room
and
deposit
the
clothing
in
labeled
impermeable
bags
or
containers.
7. When
exiting
the
work
area
workers
shall
shower
and
enter
the
clean
room
before
changing
into
street
clothes.
A. The
Contractor
alone
shall
be
responsible
for
the
safety,
efficiency,
adequacy
of
his
appliances,
work
methods
and
for
any
damage
which
may
result
from
Contractor's
improper
construction,
maintenance,
or
operation,
respectively.
He
shall
erect
and
maintain
at
all
times
adequate
safeguards
for
the
protection
of
workmen
and
surrounding
building
occupants.
The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
monitoring
his
own
construction
safety
work
practices
for
compliance
with
the
applicable
OSHA
regulations,
and
shall
provide
appropriate
personnel
protective
equipment
and
training
for
his
workers.
1. Biological/Chemical
Hazards:
The
known
hazard
on
site
includes
asbestos-‐containing
material.
Off-‐specification
materials
located
in
and
adjacent
the
structure
may
pose
a
hazard
to
site
workers.
The
Contractor
shall
provide
materials,
equipment,
and
training
to
his
workers
to
ensure
their
protection
from
these
and
any
other
chemical/biological
hazards
that
may
be
identified
during
the
work.
2. Physical
Hazards:
In
addition
to
the
common
physical
hazards
normally
present
on
construction
sites,
the
known
physical
hazards
specific
to
this
project
include:
heat
stress;
contact
with
active
equipment,
noise;
and
slip,
trip,
and
fall
hazards.
The
Contractor
shall
provide
safety
equipment
and
training
to
his
workers
to
ensure
their
protection
from
these
and
any
other
physical
hazards
that
may
be
present
during
the
work.
3. Emergency
Response:
The
Contractor
shall
establish
an
Emergency
Response
Team
made
up
of
members
of
his
work
force.
The
Contractor
shall
designate
a
Team
Leader
and
organize
workers
who
are
trained
to
respond
in
the
event
of
an
accident
or
other
emergency.
Members
of
the
Emergency
Response
Team
shall
be
knowledgeable
in
evacuation
procedures
and
would
be
the
first
to
respond
in
the
event
of
an
emergency.
4. Workmen
Protection:
During
the
project
period,
the
Contractor
shall
provide
and
maintain
safety
equipment
as
required
or
necessary
to
properly
complete
the
work.
He
shall
provide
and
maintain
such
barricades,
warning
signs
and
devices,
temporary
lighting,
and
other
safety
measures
necessary
to
properly
protect
workmen.
A. All
phases
of
the
work
shall
be
executed
by
skilled
craftsmen
experienced
in
each
respective
trade.
Improperly
trained,
untrained,
or
inexperienced
personnel
shall
not
be
allowed
in
the
work
areas.
B. The
Superintendent
shall
be
thoroughly
familiar
with
and
experienced
in
asbestos
removal
and
related
work.
The
Site
Superintendent
shall
have
successfully
completed
training
equivalent
to
the
EPA
Model
Accreditation
Plan
asbestos
contractor
and
supervision
course
(40
CFR
Part
763,
Subpart
E,
Appendix
C).
The
Superintendent
shall
meet
the
requirements
of
a
competent
person
set
down
in
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101(o).
The
supervisor
shall
be
certified
by
Safe
State
Environmental
Programs,
Chapter
822-‐X-‐2,
Accreditation
of
Training
Programs,
Training
Courses,
Refresher
Training
Courses,
and
Individuals
Engaged
in
Asbestos-‐Related
Activities.
C. All
workers,
who
will
come
in
direct
contact
with
suspect
ACM,
shall
have
asbestos
worker
training
as
outlined
in
this
paragraph.
All
asbestos
removal
workers
shall
be
knowledgeable,
qualified,
and
trained
in
the
removal,
handling,
and
disposal
of
asbestos
material
and
in
subsequent
cleaning
of
the
affected
environment.
All
asbestos
abatement
workers
shall
have
successfully
completed
training
equivalent
to
the
EPA
Model
Accreditation
Plan
asbestos
worker
training
course
(40
CFR
Part
763,
Subpart
E,
Appendix
C).
All
workers
shall
be
certified
by
Safe
State
Environmental
Programs,
Chapter
822-‐X-‐2,
Accreditation
of
Training
Programs,
Training
Courses,
Refresher
Training
Courses,
and
Individuals
Engaged
in
Asbestos-‐Related
Activities.
D. All asbestos training shall be certified by the appropriate State agency.
E. The
Contractor
shall
provide
medical
surveillance
for
all
workers
engaged
in
asbestos
removal.
Provide
the
medical
examination
in
accordance
with
OSHA
Standards
29
CFR
1910.134(b)
and
1926.1101.
The
Contractor
shall
ensure
that
all
employee
examination
results
are
on
file
in
his
office,
are
available
for
review,
and
are
maintained
in
accordance
with
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101(n)(3).
A. The
Contractor
shall
be
solely
responsible
for
providing
adequate
respiratory
protection
at
all
times
for
all
workers
in
the
work
area.
The
types
of
respirators
used
shall
be
approved
by
the
National
Institute
for
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
(NIOSH)
for
asbestos
and
in
accordance
with
29
CFR
1926.1101.
1. Respiratory
Protection
Program:
Where
the
use
of
respirators
is
required,
the
Contractor
shall
develop
a
written
standard
operating
procedure
to
govern
selection
and
use
of
respirators.
As
a
minimum
the
program
shall
address
components
as
required
by
OSHA
29
CFR
1910.134.
Program
components
shall
include:
written
standard
operating
procedures;
medical
surveillance;
training
in
selection
and
use
of
respirators;
proper
fitting
and
fit
testing;
procedures
for
inspection,
cleaning,
maintenance
and
storage;
requirements
for
surveillance
of
work
area
conditions
and
worker
exposures;
and
respirator
program
evaluation
requirements.
2. Negative
Exposure
Assessment:
The
Contractor
shall
produce
a
negative
exposure
assessment
for
each
asbestos
removal
task
to
be
performed.
The
assessment
may
be
developed
using
historical
air
monitoring
data
that
meets
the
requirements
of
29
CFR
1926.1101(f)(iii)
produced
within
the
last
12
months
combined
with
daily
personnel
monitoring
during
the
work,
or
by
providing
an
initial
exposure
assessment
and
daily
personnel
monitoring
during
the
work.
3. Minimum
Respiratory
Protection:
The
Contractor
personnel
who
will
come
in
direct
contact
with
ACM
or
suspect
ACM
shall
wear
approved
half
mask
respirator
equipped
with
HEPA
filter
as
minimum
respiratory
protection.
4. Personal/Area
Monitoring:
The
Contractor
shall
conduct
exposure
assessments
and
monitoring
in
accordance
with
29
CFR
1926.1101(f).
The
Contractor
shall
also
perform
area
monitoring
to
determine
the
extent
of
regulated
area.
Sample
analysis
results
shall
be
provided
to
the
Engineer
and
shall
be
posted
within
24
hours
of
collection.
The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
record
keeping
requirements.
The
Engineer
and/or
Owner’s
Representative
may
collect
ambient
air
samples
and
may
observe
the
work
practices
to
determine
compliance
by
the
Contractor.
A. Protective
clothing
and
equipment
shall
conform
to
OSHA
requirements.
The
Contractor
shall
perform
a
hazards
assessment
and
ensure
personal
protective
equipment
selected
and
used
at
the
project
location
is
adequate
and
appropriate
for
the
hazards.
The
Contractor
shall
be
solely
responsible
for
enforcing
personnel
protection
requirements.
1. Protective
Clothing:
Workers
shall
be
provided
with
sufficient
sets
of
properly
fitting,
full
-‐
body
coveralls
and
protective
gloves,
and
boot
-‐
type
foot
covers.
The
Contractor
shall
provide
the
Engineer,
Owner,
and
authorized
representatives
suitable
properly
fitting
protective
clothing,
whenever
they
are
required
to
enter
the
work
area.
2. Equipment:
Provide
eye
protection,
ear
protection,
protective
gloves,
fall
protection
equipment,
non-‐slip
steel
toe
shoes,
and
hard
hats
as
required
for
job
conditions
or
by
applicable
safety
regulations.
A. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
performing
air
monitoring
as
outlined
below.
1. Personnel
air
monitoring
in
accordance
with
OSHA
29
CFR
1926.1101.
2. Adjacent
area
air
monitoring
or
air
monitoring
conducted
in
the
work
area
during
asbestos
removal,
as
applicable.
The
air
monitoring
and
analysis
shall
be
performed
by
the
Air
Monitoring
Specialist
/
firm
hired
by
the
Contractor.
The
air
samples
shall
be
analyzed
by
PCM,
NIOSH
Method
7400.
3. The
Engineer
and/or
Owner’s
Representative
may
perform
air
monitoring
in
the
adjacent
area
or
within
the
work
area
during
any
period
of
the
project.
A. Perform
asbestos
abatement
in
accordance
with
procedures
outlined
29
CFR
1926.1101
for
Class
I
asbestos
work
and
Class
II
asbestos
work.
1. Establish
a
regulated
area,
and
restrict
access
into
the
work
area.
Provide
warning
signs
around
the
perimeter
of
the
regulated
area
mounted
on
the
visual
barrier,
or
similar
approach
to
the
work
area.
2. Provide
and
install
decontamination
enclosure
systems.
Coordinate
the
location
of
the
facility
with
the
Engineer
or
the
Owner’s
Representative.
3. Shut
down,
disconnect,
and
lock
out
or
tag
all
electric
power
to
the
work
area
so
that
there
is
no
possibility
of
its
reactivation
until
after
clearance
testing
of
the
work
area.
Secure
temporary
power.
4. Install
temporary
lighting
within
the
work
area
and
decontamination
enclosure
systems.
5. Shut
down,
isolate,
and
lockout
or
tagout
heating,
ventilation,
and
air
conditioning
(HVAC)
systems
if
any,
which
serve
or
which
pass
through
the
work
area.
Install
critical
seals
on
HVAC
registers,
grills,
and
diffusers.
6. Seal
floor
drains,
sumps,
and
other
collection
devices
with
plastic
sheeting
and
plywood,
as
necessary,
and
provide
a
system
to
collect
all
water
used
by
the
Contractor.
Collected
water
shall
be
passed
through
a
water
filtration
system
prior
to
being
discharged
into
the
sanitary
sewer.
7. Ensure
that
the
Contractor's
communication
equipment
is
in
place,
in
operating
condition,
and
in
operation
during
the
work.
8. Completely
seal
airtight
and
isolate
the
work
area
where
friable
materials
are
to
be
removed.
All
openings,
including
but
not
limited
to
doorways,
windows,
tunnels,
ducts,
grilles,
and
diffusers
shall
be
covered
with
plastic
sheeting
and
taped
airtight.
Based
on
the
locations
and
amount
of
ACM
to
be
removed
it
may
be
necessary
to
seal
the
work
area
from
the
exterior
of
the
building.
Smaller
openings
through
which
pipe
conduit
passes,
cracks,
and
other
small
penetrations
of
the
work
area
shall
be
sealed
using
foam
sealant.
9. Maintain
emergency
and
fire
exits
from
the
work
areas
or
establish
alternative
exits
satisfactory
to
the
local
fire
officials.
Mark
with
luminescent
paint
on
work
area
plastic
barriers
an
outline
of
exit
door(s).
Affix
a
razor
knife
beside
the
outline.
Paint
words
"EMERGENCY
EXIT"
with
luminescent
paint
inside
the
door
outline.
Modify
emergency
exit
door
as
necessary
so
it
is
secure
from
outside
the
work
area
but
permits
exiting
from
the
work
area.
Exits
shall
be
checked
daily
against
exterior
blockage
or
impediments
to
exiting.
10. Fire
Extinguisher:
A
minimum
of
one
extinguisher
shall
be
provided
for
every
1,500
square
feet
of
floor
area,
with
a
maximum
travel
distance
to
an
extinguisher
of
75
feet.
At
least
one
extinguisher
shall
be
provided
in
each
decontamination
enclosure.
The
extinguisher
shall
be
within
5
feet
of
the
equipment
room
and
clean
room.
Place
extinguishers
in
visible
and
accessible
locations.
11. Smoke
Detectors:
Provide
one
smoke
detector
in
the
decontamination
enclosure
clean
room
and
one
in
the
work
area
adjacent
to
the
AFD.
12. Cover
the
walls
with
one
layer
of
6
mil
plastic
sheet
to
a
height
of
5
feet.
Cover
the
walls
and
ceiling
with
one
layer
of
6
mil
plastic
sheet
in
the
area
with
wall
and
ceiling
material
(such
as
ceiling
tiles,
wall
tiles,
and
other
porous
surfaces)
which
cannot
be
decontaminated
by
HEPA
vacuum
and
wet
wiping.
13. Install
and
initiate
operation
of
AFD(s).
A. Construction
of
a
sealed,
contained
work
area
on
the
roof
or
outside
of
the
structure
is
impracticable.
The
following
preparations
shall
be
performed
when
preparing
a
non-‐contained
work
area
for
Class
II
asbestos
removal
work.
1. Provide
a
roped
-‐
off
perimeter
around
the
area
where
the
ACM
is
to
be
removed
and
handled.
Post
notices
and
warning
signs
around
the
perimeter
of
the
work
area.
2. Provide
a
decontamination
enclosure
system
onsite.
3. Provide
a
system
to
collect
all
water
used
by
the
Contractor.
Collected
water
shall
bepassed
through
a
water
filtration
system
prior
to
being
discharged
into
the
sanitary
sewer.
A. To
prepare
a
contained
work
area
for
gross
removal
asbestos
abatement
work,
perform
the
following
preparations
in
conjunction
with
those
outlined
in
Section
3.1
-‐
"General
Work
Area
Preparation".
1. After
establishing
the
decontamination
enclosure
systems,
preclean
and
prepare
the
work
area:
a. Remove
all
electrical
and
mechanical
items,
such
as
lighting
fixtures,
clocks,
diffusers,
registers,
escutcheon
plates,
etc.
which
cover
any
part
of
the
surface
to
be
worked
on
with
the
work.
b. Remove
all
general
construction
items
such
as
cabinets,
casework,
door
and
window
trim,
moldings,
ceilings,
trim,
etc.,
which
cover
the
surface
of
the
work
as
required
to
prevent
interference
with
the
work.
c. Clean
all
contaminated
furniture,
equipment,
and
or
supplies
with
a
HEPA
filtered
vacuum
cleaner
or
by
wet
cleaning
prior
to
being
moved
or
covered.
For
contaminated
items
that
cannot
be
cleaned,
dispose
of
as
RACM.
d. Movable
and
loose
items
not
removed
by
the
Owner
from
work
areas
shall
be
removed
from
work
areas
to
a
temporary
location
designated
by
the
Owner
or
shall
be
disposed
of
as
general
construction
debris.
e. Joints
of
covers
or
casings
shall
be
sealed
with
tape
and
fixed
objects
enclosed
with
a
minimum
of
one
layer
of
6
mil
plastic
sheeting
sealed
airtight
with
tape.
Disassembly
of
these
fixed
objects
is
not
required
unless
otherwise
noted.
A. Prior
to
removal
of
any
ACM,
the
Contractor
shall
notify
the
Engineer
and
request
a
pre-‐removal
inspection.
Posting
of
warning
signs,
building
of
personnel
and
equipment
decontamination
enclosure
systems,
and
all
other
preparatory
steps
shall
have
been
taken
prior
to
notification
of
the
Engineer.
The
Contractor
shall
not
begin
asbestos
removal
until
the
Engineer
approves
the
work
area
preparations.
3.5 MAINTENANCE OF CONTAINED WORK AREA AND DECONTAMINATION ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS
A. Inspection
of
Barriers:
Ensure
that
barriers
and
plastic
linings
are
effectively
sealed
and
taped.
Repair
damaged
barriers
and
remedy
defects
immediately
upon
their
discovery.
Visually
inspect
enclosures
at
the
beginning
and
end
of
each
work
period.
Use
smoke
methods
to
test
effectiveness
of
barriers.
B. Repair
of
Damaged
Polyethylene
Sheeting:
Remove
and
replace
plastic
sheeting
which
has
been
damaged
by
removal
operations
or
where
the
seal
has
failed
allowing
water
to
seep
between
layers.
Remove
affected
sheeting
and
wipe
down
entire
area.
Install
new
sheet
plastic
only
when
area
is
completely
dry.
C. Thoroughly
clean
the
decontamination
enclosure
systems
at
the
end
of
each
8
hour
work
shift,
and
more
frequently
if
required.
A. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
the
proper
removal
of
ACM
from
the
work
area
using
standard
abatement
industry
removal
techniques.
Work
will
be
observed
by
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative.
Approval
of
the
Contractor's
abatement
techniques
is
required
by
the
Engineer
and
the
Owner’s
Representative
to
allow
for
the
continuance
of
work.
B. ACM
shall
be
wetted
with
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
prior
to
being
disturbed.
Keep
ACM
wet
during
removal
and
disposal
of
these
materials.
Material
packed
in
disposal
containers
shall
be
in
a
wet
condition.
A. Use
methods
and
equipment
which
will
keep
the
fiber
count
during
removal
operations
to
less
than
0.1
f/cc
of
air
when
tested
by
NIOSH
Method
7400.
B. Prepare
the
ground
surface
beneath
the
roofing
removal
area
with
plastic
sheeting.
Post
appropriate
warning
signs
for
the
regulated
area.
C. Mist
the
roofing
during
removal.
Remove
the
roofing
component
as
intact
as
possible.
Wet
the
material
sufficiently
to
reduce
the
release
of
fibers.
Continually
wet
the
material
during
the
removal
process
to
minimize
fiber
dispersion.
D. Loose dust generated from removal activities shall be immediately removed using a HEPA vacuum.
E. As
the
pieces
of
roofing
are
removed,
wrap
them
in
two
layers
of
plastic
and
place
in
labeled
containers
for
transport.
A. The
work
area
shall
be
prepared
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Section
titled
"Gross
Removal
Area
Preparation.”
B. Mist
the
debris
to
be
removed
in
order
to
sufficiently
wet
the
material
to
minimize
additional
fiber
release.
C. The
wetted
debris
may
be
scooped
and
double-‐bagged
for
off-‐site
disposal.
Continually
wet
the
material
during
the
removal
process
to
minimize
fiber
dispersion.
D. Once
gross
debris
has
been
removed,
HEPA
vacuum
the
remaining
floor
and
wall
surface
to
remove
any
remaining
debris.
A. The
work
area
shall
be
prepared
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Section
titled
"Gross
Removal
Area
Preparation.”
B. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
the
proper
removal
of
surfacing
ACM
from
the
work
area
using
standard
abatement
industry
removal
techniques.
The
Contractor
shall
use
methods
and
equipment
which
will
keep
the
fiber
count
during
removal
operations
to
less
than
0.1
f/cc
of
air
when
tested
by
NIOSH
Method
7400.
C. Thoroughly
wet
ACM
to
be
removed
prior
to
stripping
and/or
tooling
to
reduce
fiber
dispersal
into
the
air.
Accomplish
wetting
by
a
fine
spray
(mist)
of
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant.
Saturate
material
sufficiently
to
wet
to
the
substrate.
Allow
time
for
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
to
penetrate
material
thoroughly.
If
amended
water
is
used,
spray
material
repeatedly
during
the
work
process
to
maintain
a
continuously
wet
condition.
If
a
removal
encapsulant
is
used,
apply
in
strict
accordance
with
manufacturer's
written
instructions.
Where
necessary,
carefully
strip
away
while
simultaneously
spraying
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
on
the
installation
to
minimize
dispersal
of
asbestos
fibers
into
the
air.
D. After
completion
of
all
stripping
work,
surfaces
from
which
ACM
have
been
removed
shall
be
wet
brushed
and
sponged
or
cleaned
by
some
equivalent
method
to
remove
all
visible
residues.
3.10 REMOVAL OF THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION (PI1, PI2, AC1, PW1, DT1, DT2, AND BI1)
A. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
the
proper
removal
of
thermal
system
insulation
(TSI)
ACM
from
the
work
area
using
standard
abatement
industry
removal
techniques.
In
locations
where
TSI
removal
is
required
that
are
not
part
of
a
contained
work
area,
the
removal
shall
be
conducted
using
glove-‐bag
techniques.
The
Contractor
shall
use
methods
and
equipment
which
will
keep
the
fiber
count
during
removal
operations
to
less
than
0.1
f/cc
of
air
when
tested
by
NIOSH
Method
7400.
Approval
of
the
Contractor's
abatement
techniques
is
required
by
the
Engineer
to
allow
for
the
continuance
of
work.
B. Thoroughly
wet
ACM
to
be
removed
prior
to
stripping
and/or
tooling
to
reduce
fiber
dispersal
into
the
air.
Accomplish
wetting
by
a
fine
spray
(mist)
of
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant.
Saturate
material
sufficiently
to
wet
to
the
substrate.
Allow
time
for
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
to
penetrate
material
thoroughly.
If
amended
water
is
used,
spray
material
repeatedly
during
the
work
process
to
maintain
a
continuously
wet
condition.
If
a
removal
encapsulant
is
used,
apply
in
strict
accordance
with
manufacturer's
written
instructions.
Where
necessary,
carefully
strip
away
while
simultaneously
spraying
amended
water
or
removal
encapsulant
on
the
installation
to
minimize
dispersal
of
asbestos
fibers
into
the
air.
As
material
is
removed,
wrap
it
in
two
layers
of
plastic
and
place
it
in
labeled
containers
for
transportation
and
disposal.
C. After
completion
of
all
stripping
work,
surfaces
from
which
ACM
have
been
removed
shall
be
wet
brushed
and
sponged
or
cleaned
by
some
equivalent
method
to
remove
all
visible
residues.
3.11 REMOVAL OF FLOORING MATERIAL (TILE AND MASTIC FT1 – FT9)
A. The
work
area
shall
be
prepared
as
described
in
Sections
3.1
and
3.3.
Use
methods
and
equipment
that
will
keep
the
fiber
count
during
removal
operations
to
less
than
0.1
f/cc
of
air
when
tested
by
NIOSH
Method
7400.
B. Mist
floors
covered
with
asbestos-‐containing
tile
or
black
flooring
mastic
with
amended
water.
Wet
the
material
sufficiently
to
reduce
the
release
of
fibers
if
the
tiles
are
broken
upon
removal.
Continually
wet
the
material
during
the
removal
process
to
minimize
fiber
dispersion.
C. Completely
remove
floor
material,
leveling
compound,
and
bulk
of
adhesive
mastic
using
appropriate
tools
and
materials.
Removal
all
layers
down
to
the
subfloor.
As
material
is
removed,
wrap
it
in
two
layers
of
plastic
and
place
it
in
labeled
containers
for
transport.
D. Completely
remove
all
bulk
mastic.
Mastic
shall
be
removed
as
ACM.
Use
of
approved
non-‐hazardous
mastic
solvent
will
be
permitted
to
remove
adhesive
mastic
from
the
floor.
E. After
completion
of
mastic
removal,
thoroughly
wash
the
floor.
No
bulk
mastic
residue
shall
remain
on
the
floor
surface
following
removal
and
cleaning.
It
is
not
necessary
to
remove
asphaltic
stain
from
the
sub-‐floor
or
concrete.
A. Fire
doors
should
be
abated
by
disposing
of
the
intact
door.
Remove
fire
doors
from
hinges
or
elevator
doors
from
tracks.
B. Wrap doors in two layers of plastic and place in labeled containers for transport.
A. Daily
Clean
Up:
Remove
all
loose
ACM,
debris,
and
bulk
dust
from
the
work
area
at
the
end
of
each
work
shift.
In
no
instance
shall
loose
ACM,
debris,
or
bulk
dust
remain
in
the
work
area
after
completion
of
a
work
shift.
B. Stop
Work
Order:
Stop
work
immediately
if
the
work
area
barrier
is
breached
in
any
manner.
Do
not
resume
asbestos
abatement
inside
the
work
area
until
authorized
in
writing
by
the
Engineer.
A. Fiber
Concentration:
The
Engineer
and/or
the
Owner’s
Representative
will
stop
the
work
should
the
fiber
count
in
the
work
exceed
0.1
f/cc
or
adjacent
non-‐work
areas
exceed
0.01
f/cc
of
air,
or
the
background
count
(the
greater
of
these
two
values
will
be
used
as
the
reference).
Work
shall
not
resume
until
the
condition(s)
causing
the
increase
are
corrected
by
the
Contractor
and
affected
areas
have
been
cleaned
as
directed
by
the
Engineer
and/or
the
Owner’s
Representative.
B. Imminent
Danger:
The
Engineer
and/or
Owner’s
Representative
will
stop
the
work
should
a
condition
or
action
creates
a
hazard
that
could
be
deemed
as
presenting
imminent
danger
to
the
workers,
building
occupants,
or
public.
Work
shall
not
resume
until
the
condition(s)
causing
the
hazard
are
corrected
by
the
Contractor
and
the
Engineer
has
authorized
the
work
resumption
in
writing.
A. The
operation
of
the
pressure
differential
system
is
used
to
remove
airborne
fibers
generated
by
the
abatement
work.
B. The
Contractor
shall
notify
the
Owner’s
Representative
(Engineer)
for
final
clearance
visual
inspection
and
clearance
air
monitoring.
C. Cleaning
of
the
work
areas
prepared
as
"gross
removal"
areas
shall
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
four
step
procedure
with
two
cleanings
of
the
primary
barrier
plastic
prior
to
its
removal
and
two
cleanings
of
the
room
surfaces
to
remove
any
new
or
existing
contamination.
1. First
Cleaning:
Carry
out
a
first
cleaning
of
all
surfaces
of
the
work
area
including
items
of
remaining
sheeting,
tools,
scaffolding
and/or
staging
by
use
of
damp-‐cleaning
and
mopping,
and/or
a
HEPA
filtered
vacuum.
Do
not
perform
dry
dusting
or
dry
sweeping.
Use
each
surface
of
a
cleaning
cloth
one
time
only
and
then
dispose
of
as
contaminated
waste.
Continue
this
cleaning
until
there
is
no
visible
debris
from
removed
materials
or
residue
on
plastic
sheeting
or
other
surfaces.
2. Remove
all
primary
filters
in
air
handling
system(s)
and
dispose
of
as
asbestos-‐containing
waste.
Replace
with
new
filters.
3. After
the
surfaces
have
passed
a
visual
inspection
verifying
that
all
debris
and
residue
has
been
removed
from
the
sheet
plastic,
allow
a
waiting
period
that
is
long
enough
for
the
HEPA-‐filtered
fan
units
operating
in
the
work
area
to
provide
96
air
changes
to
clean
air
of
airborne
asbestos
fibers.
Use
oscillating
fans
as
necessary
to
assure
circulation
of
air
in
all
parts
of
work
areas
during
this
period.
Maintain
pressure
differential
system(s)
in
operation
for
the
entire
96
air
change
period.
4. Second
Cleaning:
Carry
out
a
second
cleaning
of
all
surfaces
in
the
work
area
in
the
same
manner
as
the
first
cleaning.
5. Removal
of
Primary
Barriers:
Immediately
following
the
second
cleaning
of
the
primary
plastic,
remove
all
primary
barrier
sheeting
and
material
decontamination
unit,
if
there
is
one,
leaving
only:
a. Critical
Barrier:
Which
forms
the
sole
barrier
between
the
Work
Area
and
other
portions
of
the
building
or
the
outside.
b. Critical
Barrier
Sheeting:
Over
lighting
fixtures,
ventilation
openings,
doorways,
and
other
openings.
c. Decontamination
Unit:
For
personnel,
in
operating
condition.
d. Pressure
Differential
System:
Maintain
in
continuous
operation.
6. Third
Cleaning:
Carry
out
a
third
cleaning
of
all
surfaces
in
the
work
area
in
the
same
manner
as
the
first
cleaning
immediately
after
removal
of
primary
barrier
plastic.
This
cleaning
is
now
being
applied
to
existing
room
surfaces.
7. Contractor's
Inspection:
At
the
completion
of
the
third
above
cleaning,
visually
inspect
all
surfaces.
Re-‐clean
the
work
area
if
any
dust
or
debris
is
found.
At
completion
of
this
inspection,
sweep
entire
work
area
including
walls,
ceilings,
ledges,
floors
and
other
surfaces
in
the
work
area
with
exhaust
from
forced-‐air
equipment
(electric
leaf
blower
or
equivalent).
Do
not
direct
forced-‐air
equipment
at
any
seal
in
any
Critical
Barrier.
If
any
debris
or
dust
is
found
repeat
the
cleaning.
Continue
this
process
until
no
debris
dust
or
other
material
is
found
while
sweeping
of
all
surfaces
with
forced-‐air
equipment.
After
a
visual
inspection,
again
wait
for
a
period
of
time
long
enough
for
the
HEPA-‐filtered
fan
units
operating
in
the
work
area
to
provide
96
air
changes
to
allow
HEPA
filtered
fan
units
to
clean
air
of
airborne
asbestos
fibers.
Use
oscillating
fans
as
necessary
to
assure
circulation
of
air
in
all
parts
of
work
areas
during
this
period.
Maintain
pressure
differential
system
in
operation
for
the
entire
96
air
change
period.
8. Final
Cleaning:
Carry
out
a
final
cleaning
of
all
surfaces
in
the
work
area
in
the
same
manner
as
the
previous
cleaning.
9. Contractor's
Inspection:
After
final
cleaning,
perform
a
complete
visual
inspection
of
the
entire
work
area
including:
all
surfaces,
ceiling,
walls,
floor,
decontamination
unit,
all
plastic
sheeting,
seals
over
ventilation
openings,
doorways,
windows,
and
other
openings;
look
for
debris
from
any
source,
residue
on
surfaces,
dust
or
other
matter.
During
visual
inspection
sweep
entire
work
area
including
walls,
ceilings,
ledges,
floors,
and
other
surfaces
in
the
room
with
exhaust
from
forced
air
equipment
(electric
leaf
blower
or
equivalent).
If
any
debris,
residue,
dust
or
other
matter
is
found
repeat
final
cleaning
and
continue
decontamination
procedure
from
that
point.
When
the
area
is
visually
clean,
and
if
after
sweeping
of
all
surfaces
with
leaf
blower,
no
debris,
residue,
dust
or
other
material
is
found,
complete
the
certification
at
the
end
of
this
section.
Visual
inspection
is
not
complete
until
confirmed
in
writing,
on
the
certification,
by
the
Owner’s
Representative.
D. When
cleaning
is
complete,
visual
clearance
will
be
conducted
by
the
Owner’s
Representative
(Engineer)
of
each
area
(for
non-‐friable
materials).
E. Due
to
the
presence
of
friable
materials,
final
clearance
air
sampling
will
be
required.
For
work
areas
where
containment
has
been
erected,
when
the
work
area
passes
the
Owner’s
Representative's
(Engineer)
visual
inspection,
and
the
work
area
is
completely
dry,
the
Owner’s
Representative
(Engineer)
shall
perform
clearance
testing
using
aggressive
air
sampling
techniques.
Air
sampling
will
be
periodically
in
several
site
visits.
1. Number
and
Volume
of
Samples:
The
number
and
volume
of
air
samples
given
in
Table
3.14.1
is
the
minimum
required.
The
exact
number
and
volume
of
samples
collected
by
the
Engineer
may
increase
depending
upon
job
conditions
and
the
analytical
method
used.
2. Sampling
sensitivity:
For
transmission
electron
microscopy
(TEM)
analysis,
based
on
a
limit
of
detection
(LOD)
of
0.005
fibers/
cubic
centimeter
on
the
filter
and
a
95%
confidence
limit,
a
sample
volume
of
sufficient
size
that
a
single
sample
indicates
compliance
with
the
limit
values
given
below.
A
sample
must
be
at
or
below
the
LOD
to
indicate
that
it
is
at
or
below
the
limit
value.
Table
3.14.1
–
Clearance
Sampling
Criteria
Using
TEM
Analysis
Analytical
Sensitivity
Location
Minimum
Number
Approximate
Sampling
Rate
(structures
Sampled
of
Samples
Volume
(Liters)
(liters/minute)
/cubic
centimeter)
Each
work
area
5
per
work
area
0.005
≥1200
10
Outside
Each
5
per
area
0.005
≥1200
10
Work
Area
Work
Area
One
per
set
of
Open
for
30
0.005
0
Blank(s)
samples
seconds
Outside
Work
One
per
set
of
Open
for
30
0.005
0
Area
Blank
samples
seconds
One
per
set
of
Laboratory
Blank
0.005
0
Do
not
open
samples
3. Analysis:
Analysis
will
be
performed
using
the
analysis
method
set
forth
in
the
AHERA
regulation
40
CFR
Part
763
Appendix
A
Subpart
E.
4. Asbestos
Structures:
Referred
to
in
this
section
include
asbestos
fibers,
bundles,
clusters
or
matrices,
as
defined
by
the
method
of
analysis.
5. Release
Criteria:
Decontamination
of
the
work
site
is
complete
if
either
of
the
following
two
sets
of
conditions
are
met:
a. Work
Area
Samples
are
below
the
filter
background
levels
1) All
Work
Area
sample
volumes
are
greater
than
1,200
liters
for
a
25
millimeter
(mm)
sampling
cassette.
2) The
average
concentration
of
asbestos
of
the
five
Work
Area
Samples
does
not
exceed
the
filter
background
level
of
70
structures
per
square
millimeter
of
filter
area.
b. Work
Area
Samples
are
not
statistically
different
from
Outside
samples
1) All
sample
volumes
except
for
blanks
are
greater
than
560
liters
for
a
25
mm
sampling
cassette.
2) The
average
asbestos
concentration
of
the
three
blanks
is
below
the
filter
background
level
of
70
structures
per
square
millimeter
of
filter
area.
3) Average
asbestos
concentrations
in
Work
Area
Samples
are
not
statistically
different
from
Outside
samples,
as
determined
be
the
Z-‐test
calculation
found
in
40
CFR
Part
763,
Subpart
E,
Appendix
A
(Z
is
less
than
or
equal
to
1.65).
F. After
all
cleaning,
inspections,
and
clearance
requirements
have
been
met:
1. Shut
down
and
remove
the
pressure
differential
system.
Seal
HEPA
filtered
fan
units,
HEPA
vacuums
and
similar
equipment
with
6
mil
polyethylene
sheet
and
duct
tape
to
form
a
tight
seal
at
intake
end
before
being
moved
from
work
area.
2. Remove
personnel
decontamination
unit.
3. Remove
the
Critical
Barriers
separating
the
Work
Area
from
the
rest
of
the
building
or
the
outside.
Remove
any
small
quantities
of
residual
material
found
upon
removal
of
the
plastic
sheeting
with
wet
wiping,
HEPA
filtered
vacuum
cleaners
and
local
area
protection.
If
significant
quantities,
as
determined
by
the
Inspector,
are
found,
then
the
entire
area
affected
shall
be
decontaminated.
4. Remove
all
equipment,
materials,
and
debris
from
the
work
site.
5. Dispose
of
all
asbestos-‐containing
waste
material
as
RACM.
A. All
asbestos-‐containing
material
and
resultant
debris
shall
be
considered
as
RACM.
RACM
shall
be
handled,
packaged,
transported,
and
disposed
in
accordance
with
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101,
DOT
49
CFR
171,172
and
173,
and
EPA
Standard
40
CFR
Part
61.
B. Packaging
of
RACM
shall
conform
to
OSHA
Standard
29
CFR
1926.1101,
DOT
49
CFR
171,172
and
173,
and
EPA
Standard
40
CFR
Part
61.
RACM
waste
shall
be
placed
in
a
wet
condition
into
properly
labeled
disposal
bags
or
containers.
Waste
materials
shall
be
double-‐bagged
or
wrapped
in
two
layers
of
6
mil
plastic
sheeting
before
load-‐out
from
the
work
area.
All
air
shall
be
evacuated
from
disposal
bags
with
a
HEPA
filtered
vacuum
prior
to
sealing.
A. Sealed
and
labeled
disposal
bags
or
waste
containers
shall
be
used
to
transport
RACM
waste
to
the
landfill.
Procedures
for
hauling
and
disposal
shall
comply
with
40
CFR
Part
61,
49
CFR
Part
171
and
172,
and
other
applicable
state,
regional,
and
local
government
regulations.
B. The
Contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
the
total
removal
and
disposal
of
materials
in
an
approved
landfill
as
designated
by
the
Alabama
Department
of
Environmental
Management
(ADEM).
C. A
properly
completed
"Waste
Shipment
Record"
form
shall
accompany
asbestos
waste
transported
to
a
disposal
site.
Refer
to
40
CFR
Part
61
for
example
format
of
the
form.
D. Provide
pedestrian
barricades
and
post
with
visible
Danger
Signs
during
activities
involving
movement
of
containerized
asbestos
waste
from
the
work
area,
or
when
loading
or
unloading
containerized
asbestos
waste.
Place
signed
barricade
in
a
manner
that
will
sufficiently
block
passage
of
a
pedestrian
into
a
waste
handling
area.
Barricade
Danger
Sign
legend,
text
size,
style
and
arrangement
shall
conform
to
the
requirements
of
EPA
Standard
40
CFR
Part
61.149
(d)(1).
E. Only
sealed
disposal
containers
are
permitted
to
be
deposited
in
landfill.
Workers
shall
place
asbestos
waste
in
the
landfill.
Throwing
or
dumping
of
containers
shall
not
be
allowed.
Workers
unloading
and
handling
the
sealed
bags/drums
at
the
disposal
site
shall
wear
appropriate
personnel
protective
equipment
including
respirators
and
protective
clothing.
CERTIFICATE
OF
WORKER'S
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ASBESTOS
ABATEMENT
WORKERS
RESPIRATORY
PROTECTION
JUSTIFICATION
Project
Name:
Location:
Date
of
Submittal:
Date(s)
Historic
Monitoring
Data
Was
Collected:
Based
upon
airborne
asbestos
fiber
counts
encountered
on
previous
projects
of
a
similar
type
under
work
place
conditions
closely
resembling
the
processes,
type
of
material,
control
methods,
work
practices,
and
environmental
conditions
used
and
prevailing
in
the
Contractor's
current
operations,
the
following
level
of
respiratory
protection
is
proposed
for
the
indicated
operations
to
maintain
an
airborne
fiber
concentration
below
0.005
fibers
per
cubic
centimeter
(f/cc)
exposure
limit
inside
the
respirator
facepiece
of
the
abatement
worker.
Operation
Anticipated
Respiratory
Protection
F/CC
in
F/CC
Protection
Factor
Mask
PREPARED FOR:
ArchitectureWorks, LLP
ArchitectureWorks, LLP
130 Nineteenth Street South
Birmingham, Alabama 35233
Building & Earth Sciences, Inc. has completed the authorized subsurface exploration and
geotechnical engineering evaluation for the proposed Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions
located at intersection of Avenue East and 19th Street Ensley in Birmingham, Alabama.
The purpose of this exploration and evaluation was to determine general subsurface conditions
at the site and to address applicable geotechnical aspects of the proposed construction and site
development. The recommendations in this report are based on a physical reconnaissance of the
site and observation and classification of samples obtained from five (5) soil test borings
conducted at the site. Confirmation of the anticipated subsurface conditions during construction
is an essential part of geotechnical services.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide consultation services for the proposed project. If you
have any questions regarding the information in this report or need any additional information,
please call us.
Respectfully Submitted,
BUILDING & EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
APPENDIX
Page | i
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
The subject site is located at intersection of Avenue East and 19th Street Ensley in
downtown Ensley. Information relative to the proposed site and the proposed
development is listed in Table 1 below. Photographs depicting the current site condition
are presented on the following page.
Development
Detail Description
Item
Size (Ac.) ±0.8
Existing Development Existing 10-story office tower and parking lot
Vegetation Few trees in the northwest area of the site
General Site Slopes No
Retaining Walls No
Drainage Good
Cuts & Fills Minimum cuts and fills (assumed)
No. of Bldgs 3
Square Ft. 14,400
Wall Loads 10-story building addition: Less than 18 kips per linear foot
1-2 story building additions: Less than 5 kips per linear foot
Page | 1
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Page | 2
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
The authorized subsurface exploration was performed on May 25 and 26, 2017 in
conformance with our proposal BH19039, dated May 2, 2017. Occasionally some
modification of the scope outlined in our proposal is required to provide for proper
evaluation of the encountered subsurface conditions.
Two piezometers were installed at the site for long-term groundwater monitoring. The
soil boring and piezometer locations were determined in the field by a representative of
our staff by measuring distances from existing site features. As such, the boring and
piezometer locations shown on the Boring Location Plan attached to this report should
be considered approximate.
The soil samples recovered during our site investigation were visually classified and
specific samples were selected by the project engineer for laboratory analysis. The
laboratory analysis consisted of:
The results of the laboratory analysis are presented on the enclosed Boring Logs and in
tabular form in the Appendix of this report. Descriptions of the laboratory tests that were
performed are also included in the Appendix.
The information gathered from the exploration was evaluated to determine a suitable
foundation type for the proposed structure. The information was also evaluated to help
determine if any special subgrade preparation procedures will be required during the
earthwork phase of the project.
The results of the work are presented within this report that addresses:
Page | 3
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
The following discussion is intended to create a general understanding of the site from a
geotechnical engineering perspective. It is not intended to be a discussion of every
potential geotechnical issue that may arise, nor to provide every possible interpretation
of the conditions identified. The following conditions and subsequent recommendations
are based on the assumption that significant changes in subsurface conditions do not
occur between boreholes. However, anomalous conditions can occur due to variations in
existing fill that may be present at the site, or the geologic conditions at the site, and it
Page | 4
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
will be necessary to evaluate the assumed conditions during site grading and foundation
installation.
3.1 GEOLOGY
Based on published information the site is underlain by the Conasauga Formation of
Cambrian Age. The Conasauga Formation typically consists of thin-to-medium-bedded
limestone with thin partings of shale. The beds are usually folded and fractured.
Weathering of this formation results in a clayey or silty-clay soil that ranges from 5 to 50+
feet in thickness. The bedrock surface is highly irregular. Pinnacles may project to the
surface, and limestone boulders and fragments occur throughout the soil zone. The
formation is also susceptible to vertical clay filled slots and seams.
Published geologic literature indicates that the Conasauga Formation is prone to the
development of sinkholes. Although the site is prone to the development of sinkholes,
there is no certainty that a sinkhole or other related features will or will not develop in the
future. However, this area is much more susceptible to sinkhole development than an area
underlain by sandstone or shale. Voids were not encountered during our field
exploration, however, it is noted that no water return was obtained during rock
coring in boring B-05.
Key factors involved in the absence or presence of sinkhole activity in a particular area are
the presence of soluble, carbonate rock and the movement of groundwater through the
rock. As groundwater is moved from carbonate strata, cavities or voids within the rock
that were once water-filled become open. Residual clay overlying the voids and situated
between the bedrock and ground surface begins to "spall" or migrate into these voids.
This spalling results in new voids which are located in the clay. As spalling continues
upward, the overlying clay eventually can no longer support itself and a depression forms
at the surface, resulting in a sinkhole.
Based on the Engineering Geology of the Adamsville Quadrangle, Alabama (1979) the site
is located approximately 0.2 miles east of a trust fault and about 1 mile away from an area
identified as most susceptible to subsidence by sinkhole collapse.
Page | 5
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
the east of the building is a small parking lot and alleyway. To the north of the building is
a gravel lot. A previous building was located on the northern half of the gravel lot. Based
on the available Google Earth aerial image of the site, this building appears to have been
demolished at some time between December 2003 and April 2005.
Approximately 3 to 4 inches of topsoil were encountered in borings B-01, B-04 and B-05.
Approximately 3 inches of gravel were encountered at the surface of boring B-02. In
boring B-03, approximately 4 inches of concrete and 6 inches of aggregate base material
were encountered at the surface. The topsoil, concrete and base depths reported on the
boring logs should only be construed as an estimate and actual conditions during
construction will vary. The topsoil, root zone, concrete, and aggregate base layers may be
thicker in unexplored areas of the site, which can affect the quantities of material removed
during site grading.
Subsurface soil profiles have also been prepared based on the data obtained at the
specific boring locations. The subsurface soil profiles are presented in the Appendix. For
specific details on the information obtained from individual soil borings, please refer to
the Boring Logs included in the Appendix. The elevations of the borings indicated in this
report were estimated from Google Earth.
Page | 6
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
In borings B-01 and B-02 the existing fill layer consisted of fat clay and extended to
approximately 1.5 to 2 feet below the ground surface. The fat clay was generally medium
stiff to very stiff and was dark brown and reddish brown in color. In borings B-04 and B-
05 the existing fill consisted of very loose to loose clayey sands (SC) and extended to
approximately 1.5 below the ground surface. The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-
values within the fill layer ranged from 5 to 20 Based on the N-values, the existing fill
layer appears to be poorly to moderately compacted. Trace of rock, asphalt, glass, bricks
and concrete fragments were observed in the samples from the fill layer.
The moisture content of the fill samples tested ranged from approximately 10 to 21
percent. Atterberg Limits Tests performed on a selected SC fill sample exhibited low
plasticity with a Liquid Limit of (LL) of 29 and a Plasticity Index (PI) of 15.
RESIDUAL SOILS
Residual soils, materials formed by the in-place weathering of the parent bedrock, were
encountered in all boring locations below the existing fill layer and extended to auger
refusal depths. The residual soils consisted of lean clay (CL). The CL soils were generally
medium stiff to very stiff. Low consistency soils (N≤6) were encountered in the upper 5
feet of the CL soils in all of borings except B-02. N-values below 5 feet typically increased
with depth.
LIMESTONE BEDROCK
Auger refusal was encountered in all of borings at depths ranging from 18.5 to 43 feet
below existing grades. Borings B-04, and B-05 were extended past their refusal depths
using rock coring techniques and were terminated at depths ranging from 47.7 to 59.8
feet below existing grades. Rock cores were obtained below the refusal level to evaluate
the character and continuity of the refusal material or rock mass. Additional information
such as recovery, rock quality designation (RQD), and unconfined compressive strength
results are included in the Appendix.
In general, the bedrock consisted primarily of limestone. Very poor limestone rock mass
quality was encountered in boring B-05 with RQD value of 0%. The coring advance in
boring B-05 was very slow and very little sample recovery occurred. This could be due to
issues with the coring equipment or to the nature of the rock material. There were no
Page | 7
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
voids or very soft zones encountered in boring B-05. Coring advance in boring B-04 was
significantly faster. Sample recovery was also good in boring B-04. The limestone
generally exhibited fair to good rock mass quality in boring B-04. Recovery in boring B-
04 generally ranged from 45% to 100%, except in Run #2 (27.8 to 32.8 feet), where a
recovery of 13% was recorded. Due to the very limited recovery in boring B-05, rock core
compressive strength test results obtained from boring B-04 were used for the analysis in
this report. Photographs of the rock cores are included in the Appendix.
AUGER REFUSAL
Auger refusal is the drilling depth at which the borehole can no longer be advanced using
soil drilling procedures. Auger refusal can occur on hard soil, boulders, buried debris or
bedrock. Coring is required to sample the material below auger refusal. Auger refusal
was encountered in all borings at the depths below.
GROUNDWATER
At the time of drilling, groundwater was encountered in four of the five borings at depths
ranging from 18.5 feet to 29 feet below the surface. At the end of drilling, groundwater
was measured in 3 of the borings at depths ranging from 9 to 12 feet below the existing
surface elevation. Water levels reported are accurate only for the time and date reported.
The borings were backfilled the same day that they were drilled. Piezometers were
installed on 5/26/17 in P-01 and P-02 to provide longer term groundwater elevation
information. Groundwater data is included in the following table.
Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Boring
Depth at time Depth at end Depth On
No.
of drilling (ft) of drilling (ft) 6/8/17 (ft)
B-01 27.0 9.0 -
B-02 29.0 -
B-03 18.5 12.0 10.0
B-05 27.5 9.0 -
P-01* - 10.3
P-02* - 7.5
Table 4: Groundwater Depth
* Piezometer was installed.
Page | 8
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
The SeisOpt® refraction microtremor (ReMi®) method was used to determine the Seismic Site Class of
the building areas. SeisOpt® ReMi® Vs30 software uses data from conventional seismograph and P-wave
geophones to estimate average shear wave velocities and one and two-dimensional shear wave profiles
to a depth of 100 feet below the existing site grades. These velocities are used to classify a building site
with the IBC site Class A through E designation. The average shear wave velocity (Vs) in the upper 100
feet was 2405 feet per second (ft/s) on 18th Ave and 2451 feet per second (ft/s) on Ave E. The results of
the shear wave velocity analysis are included in the Appendix.
Table 5: Seismic Site Classification
According to Figure 1613.3.1(1) of the IBC 2015, the project site has a mapped 0.2 second
spectral response acceleration (Ss) of 0.268g. Based on Figure 1613.3.1(2), the project has
a mapped 1.0 second spectral response acceleration (S1) of 0.106g.
Using Tables 1613.3.3(1) and 1613.3.3(2), the mapped spectral accelerations, and Site
Class C; the site coefficients Fa and Fv have been determined to be 1.2 and 1.69,
respectively. The maximum considered spectral response accelerations, SMS and SM1, were
determined to be 0.321g and 0.180g, respectively. The design spectral response
accelerations, SDS and SD1, were determined to be 0.214g and 0.120g, respectively.
A grading plan was not available at the time of this report. Based on the existing
topography, we assumed grades will remain virtually unchanged. Depending on the final
building configuration more significant cuts could be required due to the existing
retaining wall at the east property boundary.
Based on our evaluation of the subsurface soil information, and the anticipated
foundation loads, it appears that the 10-story building addition construction can be
supported on deep foundations (drilled piers) and the two 1-2 story building additions
can be supported on conventional shallow foundations. If a different type of
foundation system is preferred, Building & Earth should be allowed to review the
site development recommendations to verify that they are appropriate for the
preferred foundation system.
Page | 9
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
The presence of low consistency soils (N ≤ 6) in the upper 5 feet across the site.
The presence, compaction and composition of the existing fill material.
The presence of relatively shallow groundwater.
Moisture sensitive soils encountered throughout the site.
Recommendations addressing the site conditions are presented in the following sections.
Because of past use of the site, buried structures could be encountered such as
foundations, utility lines, septic tanks, etc. If encountered, they should be removed
and backfilled in accordance with requirements outlined in the Structural Fill section
of this report.
During site preparation activities, the contractor should identify borrow source materials
that will be used as structural fill and provide samples to the testing laboratory so that
conformance to the Structural Fill requirements outlined below and appropriate moisture-
density relationship curves can be determined.
After an area has been stripped, and undercut if required, prior to the
placement of any fill.
Page | 10
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Some instability may exist during construction, depending on climatic and other factors
immediately preceding and during construction. If any soft or otherwise unsuitable soils
are identified during the proofrolling process, they must be undercut or stabilized prior
to fill placement, pavement construction, or floor slab construction. All unsuitable material
identified during the construction shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the
Structural Fill section of this report.
The contractor should anticipate some difficulty during the earthwork phase of this
project if moisture levels are moderate to high during construction. Increased moisture
levels will soften the subgrade and the soils may become unstable under the influence of
construction traffic. Accordingly, construction during wet weather conditions should be
avoided, as this could result in soft and unstable soil conditions that would require ground
modification, such as in place stabilization or undercutting.
Page | 11
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Some unsuitable or unstable areas may be present in unexplored areas of the site. Once
the undercut is complete, the areas planned for construction should be proofrolled in
order to identify any additional soft soils requiring removal.
The undercut soils should be replaced with structural fill. Clean, non-organic, non-
saturated soils taken from the undercut area can be re-used as structural fill. The
placement procedure, compaction and composition of the structural fill must meet the
requirements of the Structural Fill section of this report.
Clay CL, SC, GC LL<50, PI<25, d>100 pcf All locations and depths.
Page | 12
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Notes:
1. LL indicates the soil Liquid Limit; PI indicates the soil Plasticity Index; d indicates the maximum dry
density as defined by the density standard outlined in the table below.
2. Laboratory testing of the soils proposed for fill must be performed in order to verify their
conformance with the above recommendations.
3. Any fill to be placed at the site should be reviewed by the geotechnical engineer.
Specification Requirement
Maximum 8-inch loose lifts when compacted with large heavy compaction
Lift Thickness equipment. Maximum 6-inch loose lifts when compacted with lightweight
compaction equipment (thinner lifts may be required in confined locations).
Minimum of 98 percent of maximum dry density as defined by ASTM D698 at all
Density
locations and depths.
± 2 percent of optimum moisture as defined by ASTM D698 for cohesive soils. For
cohesionless soils with greater than 12 percent passing the US Standard No. 200
Moisture
sieve, ± 3 of optimum moisture as defined above. Moisture requirement is waived for
cohesionless soils with less than 12 percent passing the No. 200 sieve.
One test per 2,500 sf in building areas and one test per 5,000 sf in pavement areas
Density Testing
with minimum of 3 tests per lift. One test per 200 feet of trench backfill with minimum
Frequency
of 2 tests per lift.
Table 7: Structural Fill Placement Requirements
Page | 13
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
During rainy periods, additional effort will be required to properly prepare the site and
establish/maintain an acceptable subgrade. The difficulty will increase in areas where clay
or silty soils are exposed at the subgrade elevation. Grading contractors typically
postpone grading operations during wet weather to wait for conditions that are more
favorable. Contractors can typically disk or aerate the upper soils to promote drying
during intermittent periods of favorable weather. When deadlines restrict postponement
of grading operations, additional measures such as undercutting and replacing saturated
soils or stabilization can be utilized to facilitate placement of additional fill material.
According to provided preliminary loading information, column loads will be less than
550 kips and wall loads will be less than 18 kips per linear foot for the 10-story building
addition construction. Column loads will be less than 250 kips and wall loads will be less
than 5 kips per linear foot for the 1-2 story building addition construction. If actual
loading conditions exceed our anticipated loads, Building & Earth Sciences should
be allowed to review the proposed structural design and its effects on our
recommendations for foundation design.
Even though computed footing dimensions may be less, column footings should be at
least 24 inches wide and strip footings should be at least 18 inches wide. These
dimensions facilitate hand cleaning of footing subgrades disturbed by the excavation
process and the placement of reinforcing steel. They also reduce the potential for
localized punching shear failure. All exterior footings should bear at least 24 inches
below the adjacent exterior grade. Total settlement of footings designed and
constructed as recommended above should be 1 inch or less.
Page | 14
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
A design decision to be addressed when using rock sockets is whether to neglect one or
the other component of resistance (side or base), for the purpose of evaluating the drilled
pier capacity. For strong rock, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommends
to use either side friction or end bearing resistance only, but not both. It is our opinion
that the use of drilled piers sized for only end bearing is appropriate for this site for the
following reasons:
The drilled pier base will be bearing in rock which is either massive or tightly
jointed. The unconfined compressive strength of the limestone tested ranged from
approximately 8.06 ksi to 15.39 ksi. The presence of cavities, voids or soft soil seams
can be verified with test probes.
The conditions are suitable for the preparation of a clean base. This can be verified
by visual observation prior to concrete placement.
The amount of rock removal is a major factor in the drilled pier foundation costs.
The use of a high allowable end bearing capacity will reduce the amount of rock
removal required for the shafts.
The depth of the upper rock surface varied from 18.5 to 28 feet below the existing ground
surface. Hard rock excavation will be required in order to prepare a level bearing surface
for the drilled piers. The amount of rock excavated will vary at any particular location. The
amount of rock excavation required to achieve a suitable bearing condition will have a
major impact on the foundation construction costs. Based on the information obtained at
the core locations, we anticipate that competent bedrock will be encountered on or near
the rock surface. For preliminary budgeting purposes, we recommend that rock
excavation quantities averaging twice the pier diameter be used in areas of competent
rock. A concrete overage factor of 1.4 times the neat shaft volume is also recommended.
The table below summarizes the approximate depths and elevations where rock surface
and competent rock were encountered at each boring location.
Page | 15
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
A factor of safety of 3.0 was used for the drilled pier analysis. We recommend that at least
10 feet of continuous rock be present below the bottom of the drilled shaft. The following
table summarizes the design parameters for drilled piers bearing in continuous limestone:
Parameter Value
Minimum Diameter 30 in.
Allowable End Bearing Pressure 130 ksf
Allowable Skin Friction for Uplift Resistance 7.6 ksf (concrete on rock socket)
Minimum Spacing 3 x Pier Diameter
Group Reduction Factor None*
* We understand that pier groups will not be used.
Estimated settlements were calculated using SHAFT® (Version 2012.7.10). The anticipated
settlement values were less than 0.35 inch for a 30-inch diameter pier. The anticipated
settlement of larger piers is less than that estimated for the 30-inch pier.
A Building & Earth engineer or qualified representative should observe the installation of
production piers to check that the installation criteria are implemented. Test holes must
be performed in order to verify rock continuity. A minimum of one 2-inch diameter
test hole should be drilled in each pier excavation. The test hole should be drilled in
the center of the pier excavation, and should extend a minimum of twice the pier
diameter, or 10 feet, whichever is greater. We recommend that drilled piers have a
minimum diameter of 30 inches to allow for cleaning and reviewing the exposed bearing
surface. Loose material and fractured rock should be removed from the bearing surface.
Bearing elevations will be adjusted based on actual conditions encountered. Alternative
recommendations can be provided if anomalous or unforeseen conditions occur.
Page | 16
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Proper installation of drilled piers is essential to the success of the foundation system. In
addition to structural considerations, certain safety hazards to personnel exist during
construction and observation. The following guidelines should be observed during the
installation of drilled piers:
Concrete Placement:
o Concrete slump of 5 to 8 inches.
o The concrete may be placed by “free-fall” if the concrete is not allowed to strike
the reinforcement or the sides of the temporary casing. Otherwise, tremies or
centering chutes should be used.
o Clean bearing and socket surface of loose debris.
o Place concrete the same day excavation is completed.
o Maintain positive head of concrete during casing removal to prevent
contamination.
The analysis of uplift effects was not included in our scope of services. The length and
diameter required to resist uplift loads should be determined by the structural engineer
of record, applying the provided skin friction uplift resistance. We understand that the
Page | 17
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
lateral evaluation of the drilled pier will be performed by the structural engineer. Soil
parameters to be used for the evaluation of individual pier behavior under lateral loading
conditions are presented in the Appendix. The soil parameters were estimated based on
visual inspection of the soil and rock samples, laboratory test results, SPT N-values and
engineering judgment.
We understand that below grade walls are planned for the site development. The below
grade walls planned at the site should bear into newly placed structural fill or residual soil,
and may be dimensioned for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf.
We typically recommend that all below grade walls be backfilled with free-draining
granular fill such as No. 57 stone (ASTM D448). The lowest earth pressures are developed
when stone fill is placed in the zone defined by projecting a 1(H):1(V) line from the base
of the wall to the finished subgrade elevation / ground surface as shown in Figure 7. If
soil is used for backfill, the pressures will be greater and, as a minimum, a drainage blanket
Page | 18
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
(at least 2 feet wide) should be used so that hydrostatic pressure does not develop on the
wall. A layer of suitable filtration fabric, such as Amoco/ProPex 4545 or Mirafi N140 or
equivalent, should be placed between the soil and stone backfill to reduce migration of
soil fines into the drainage zone behind the wall.
Because the stone fill behind the wall may support structures, the fill must be placed and
compacted in a systematic manner. The stone fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding
six (6) inches and compacted using a vibratory plate compactor. Because density tests
cannot be performed in open graded aggregate, the fill placement and compaction
should be visually monitored.
The following earth pressures are recommended for design of stem walls (if any) and
below-grade walls. At rest parameters should be used to design walls that are not allowed
to rotate or translate. Appropriate surcharge loads must be included in the design.
Lateral earth pressures are greater for walls with free-draining material placed in a zone
steeper than the 1(H):1(V) projection recommended above. In that case, we recommend
that walls be designed using the soil parameter values for structural fill as shown in the
table above.
The recommended lateral earth pressure values are based on a fully-drained condition. If
hydrostatic pressure is allowed to build up behind walls, additional pressures will develop.
The No. 57 aggregate backfill will function as a drainage blanket. The drainage blanket
Page | 19
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
should have a minimum width of 2 feet and should be wrapped in filter fabric to minimize
intrusion of fines. A perforated drain line should be installed at the base of the wall
footing and should extend to a sump where water can be collected and removed or drains
should discharge by gravity flow to a suitable outfall.
Lateral pressures arising from surcharge loading, earthquake loading, and groundwater,
should be added to the above earth pressures to determine the total lateral pressures. In
addition, transient loads imposed on the retaining walls by construction equipment
during backfilling should be taken into consideration. Excessively heavy grading
equipment (that could impose temporary excessive lateral pressures) should not be
allowed within 5 feet (horizontally) of the walls.
Passive earth pressures of materials adjacent to the retaining wall footings as well as
bearing material friction at the footing bases may be used to resist shear. The following
Page | 20
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
table presents recommended allowable friction coefficient values and passive earth
pressure values for the anticipated materials.
The use of passive resistance requires that the material adjacent to the footing base not
be removed (for utility installation, excavation, etc.)
Floor slabs for the proposed building should be supported on a minimum four (4) inches
thick compacted layer of free-draining, granular material, such as AASHTO No. 610 or 57
stone. The purpose of this layer is to serve as a leveling course and act as a capillary break
for moisture migration through the subgrade soil.
Depending on the proposed floor covering, consideration should be given to the use of
a polyethylene vapor barrier. The slabs should be appropriately reinforced (if required) to
support the proposed loads.
With addition of the granular material, an effective modulus of subgrade reaction of 150
pci can be used in the design of grade supported building floor slabs.
The subgrade soils often become disturbed during the period between initial site grading
and construction of surface improvements. The amount and depth of disturbance will
vary with soil type, weather conditions, construction traffic, and drainage.
The engineer should evaluate the subgrade soil during final grading and prior to stone
placement to verify that the subgrade is suitable to receive pavement base or floor slabs.
The final evaluation may include proofrolling or density tests.
Page | 21
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
Subgrade rehabilitation can become a point of controversy when different contractors are
responsible for mass and final grading. The construction documents should specifically
state which contractor will be responsible for maintaining and rehabilitating the subgrade.
Rehabilitation may include wetting, mixing, and re-compacting soils that have dried
excessively or drying soils that have become wet.
Field verification of site conditions is an essential part of the services provided by the
geotechnical consultant. In order to confirm our recommendations, it will be necessary
for Building & Earth personnel to make periodic visits to the site during site grading.
Typical construction monitoring services are listed below.
This report was prepared for ArchitectureWorks, LLP, for specific application to the
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions located in Birmingham, Alabama. The information
in this report is not transferable. This report should not be used for a different
development on the same property without first being evaluated by the engineer.
The recommendations in this report were based on the information obtained from our
field exploration and laboratory analysis. The data collected is representative of the
locations tested. Variations are likely to occur at other locations throughout the site.
Engineering judgment was applied in regards to conditions between borings. It will be
necessary to confirm the anticipated subsurface conditions during construction.
Page | 22
Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation,
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions, Birmingham, Alabama
Project No: BH170134, June 12, 2017
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards of
geotechnical engineering practice. No other warranty is expressed or implied. In the
event that changes are made, or anticipated to be made, to the nature, design, or location
of the project as outlined in this report, Building & Earth must be informed of the changes
and given the opportunity to either verify or modify the conclusions of this report in
writing, or the recommendations of this report will no longer be valid.
The scope of services for this project did not include any environmental assessment of
the site or identification of pollutants or hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner
is concerned about environmental issues Building & Earth would be happy to provide an
additional scope of services to address those concerns.
This report is intended for use during design and preparation of specifications and may
not address all conditions at the site during construction. Contractors reviewing this
information should acknowledge that this document is for design information only.
Page | 23
Appendix Table of Contents
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGIES ........................................................................................... 1
DRILLING PROCEDURES – STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (ASTM D1586) ........................... 1
ROCK CORING ................................................................................................................................................... 1
BORING LOG DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3
DEPTH AND ELEVATION................................................................................................................................ 3
SAMPLE TYPE ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
SAMPLE NUMBER............................................................................................................................................. 3
BLOWS PER INCREMENT, REC%, RQD% ................................................................................................. 3
SOIL DATA ........................................................................................................................................................... 3
SOIL DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................................... 4
GRAPHIC .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
REMARKS ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
SOIL CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................... 5
KEY TO LOGS......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
KEY TO HATCHES ................................................................................................................................................................ 8
BORING LOCATION PLAN ............................................................................................................................................... 9
SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILES ........................................................................................................................................ 10
BORING LOGS..................................................................................................................................................................... 11
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES .............................................................................................................................. 12
DESCRIPTION OF SOILS (VISUAL-MANUAL PROCEDURE) (ASTM D2488) ............................. 12
POCKET PENETROMETER ............................................................................................................................ 12
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D2216) ............................................................................... 12
ATTERBERG LIMITS (ASTM D4318).......................................................................................................... 12
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ON ROCK SAMPLES (ASTM D7012) ............................. 12
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 13
Table A-1: General Soil Classification Test Results ....................................................................... 13
Table A-2: Rock Core Test Results....................................................................................................... 13
ROCK CORE PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................................................................ 14
HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGES OF THE SITE .............................................................................................................. 15
REMI® SURVEY .................................................................................................................................................................. 16
SHAFT OUTPUT .................................................................................................................................................................. 17
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS GEOTECHNICAL-ENGINEERING REPORT ............................ 18
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGIES
The subsurface exploration, which is the basis of the recommendations of this report, has
been performed in accordance with industry standards. Detailed methodologies employed
in the investigation are presented in the following sections.
At each boring location, soil samples were obtained at standard sampling intervals with a
split-spoon sampler. The borehole was first advanced to the sample depth by augering and
the sampling tools were placed in the open hole. The sampler was then driven 18 inches
into the ground with a 140-pound automatic hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number
of blows required to drive the sampler each 6-inch increment was recorded. The initial
increment is considered the “seating” blows, where the sampler penetrates loose or
disturbed soil in the bottom of the borehole.
The blows required to penetrate the final two (2) increments are added together and are
referred to as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value. The N-value, when properly
evaluated, gives an indication of the soil’s strength and ability to support structural loads.
Many factors can affect the SPT N-value, so this result cannot be used exclusively to evaluate
soil conditions.
The SPT testing was performed using a drill rig equipped with an automatic hammer.
Automatic hammers mechanically control the height of the hammer drop, and doing so,
deliver higher energy efficiency (90 to 99 % efficiency) than manual hammers (60 %
efficiency) which are dropped using a manually operated rope and cathead system. Because
historic data correlations were developed based on use of a manual hammer, it is necessary
to adjust the N-values obtained using an automatic hammer to make these correlations
valid. Therefore, an energy correction factor of 1.3 was applied to the recorded field N-values
from the automatic hammer for the purpose of our evaluation. The N-values discussed or
mentioned in this report and shown on the boring logs are recorded field values.
Samples retrieved from the boring locations were labeled and stored in plastic bags at the
jobsite before being transported to our laboratory for analysis. The project engineer
prepared Boring Logs summarizing the subsurface conditions at the boring locations.
ROCK CORING
Rock coring was performed in accordance with ASTM Specification D2113-99. During the
coring operations the rock cores were placed in core boxes at the site and transported to
our laboratory for identification and classification. At the laboratory the rock type was
identified and the “recovery” and “rock quality designation” (RQD) was determined. The
recovery is the ratio of the length of sample obtained to the length of the run cored, as a
percent. The RQD is the percentage of the length of the core run which has rock segments
of moderately hard or harder rock four inches or greater in length, compared to the total
length of the run. The percent recovery and RQD are related to rock soundness and
Page | A-1
continuity. Generalized rock descriptions, percent recovery, and RQD values are shown on
the boring logs.
Rock cores were obtained in two (2) of the five (5) boring locations, B-04, and B-05.
Page | A-2
BORING LOG DESCRIPTION
Building & Earth Sciences, Inc. used the gINT software program to prepare the attached boring
logs. The gINT program provides the flexibility to custom design the boring logs to include
the pertinent information from the subsurface exploration and results of our laboratory
analysis. The soil and laboratory information included on our logs is summarized below:
SAMPLE TYPE
The method used to collect the sample is shown. The typical sampling methods include Split
Spoon Sampling, Shelby Tube Sampling, Grab Samples, and Rock Core. A key is provided at
the bottom of the log showing the graphic symbol for each sample type.
SAMPLE NUMBER
Each sample collected is numbered sequentially.
SOIL DATA
Column 6 is a graphic representation of four different soil parameters. Each of the parameters
use the same graph, however, the values of the graph subdivisions vary with each parameter.
Each parameter presented on column 6 is summarized below:
N-value- The Standard Penetration Test N-value, obtained by adding the number of
blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches, is recorded . The graph labels
range from 0 to 50.
Qu – Unconfined Compressive Strength estimate from the Pocket Penetrometer test in
tons per square foot (tsf). The graph labels range from 0 to 5 tsf.
Atterberg Limits – The Atterberg Limits are plotted with the plastic limit to the left, and
liquid limit to the right, connected by a horizontal line. The difference in the plastic and
liquid limits is referred to as the Plasticity Index. The Atterberg Limits test results are
also included in the Remarks column on the far right of the boring log. The Atterberg
Limits graph labels range from 0 to 100%.
Moisture – The Natural Moisture Content of the soil sample as determined in our
laboratory.
Page | A-3
SOIL DESCRIPTION
The soil description prepared in accordance with ASTM D2488, Visual Description of Soil
Samples. The Munsel Color chart is used to determine the soil color. Strata changes are
indicated by a solid line, with the depth of the change indicated on the left side of the line and
the elevation of the change indicated on the right side of the line. If subtle changes within a
soil type occur, a broken line is used. The Boring Termination or Auger Refusal depth is shown
as a solid line at the bottom of the boring.
GRAPHIC
The graphic representation of the soil type is shown. The graphic used for each soil type is
related to the Unified Soil Classification chart. A chart showing the graphic associated with
each soil classification is included.
REMARKS
Remarks regarding borehole observations, and additional information regarding the
laboratory results and groundwater observations.
Page | A-4
SOIL CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY
Symbols
Major Divisions Group Name & Typical Description
Lithology Group
More than
50% of Sand and
material is Sandy SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines
Clean Sands
larger than Soils
No. 200 (Less than 5% fines) Poorly-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no
sieve
SP fines
More than
size 50% of
coarse SM Silty sands, sand – silt mixtures
fraction is Sands with Fines
smaller than
No. 4 (More than 12% fines)
SC Clayey sands, sand – clay mixtures
sieve
Page | A-5
SOIL CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY
Plasticity Index (PI)
are presented in general accordance with 40
Terzaghi, Peck, & Mesri’s (1996) method, as
shown on Table 2, when quantitative field and/or 30
laboratory data is available. Table 2 includes CL or OL
Consistency and Relative Density correlations 20
with N-values obtained using either a manual MH or OH
hammer (60 percent efficiency) or automatic 10
7
CL-ML ML or OL
hammer (90 percent efficiency). The Blows Per 4
0
Increment and SPT N-values displayed on the
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
boring logs are the unaltered values measured in
Liquid Limit (LL)
the field. When field and/or laboratory data is not
available, we may classify soil in general
accordance with the Visual Manual Procedure Figure 1: Plasticity Chart (based on ASTM D2487)
presented in ASTM D2488.
Table 2: Soil Consistency and Relative Density (based on Terzaghi, Peck & Mesri, 1996)
* - Modified based on 80% hammer efficiency
Page | A-6
KEY TO LOGS
Flights on the outside of the shaft advance soil cuttings to the surface. The
Hollow Stem Auger
hollow stem allows sampling through the middle of the auger flights.
Descriptor Meaning
Mud Rotary / A cutting head advances the boring and discharges a drilling fluid to
Wash Bore support the borehole and circulate cuttings to the surface. Trace Likely less than 5%
Flights on the outside bring soil cuttings to the surface. Solid stem requires Few 5 to 10%
Solid Flight Auger
removal from borehole during sampling. Little 15 to 25%
Cylindrical bucket (typically 3-inch diameter and 8 inches long) attached to a Some 30 to 45%
Hand Auger
metal rod and turned by human force. Mostly 50 to 100%
Page | A-7
KEY TO LOGS
The operator tightens and loosens the rope around a rotating drum assembly to lift
Manual Hammer
and drop a sliding, 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches.
An automatic mechanism is used to lift and drop a sliding, 140-pound hammer
Automatic Trip Hammer
falling 30 inches.
Uses a 15-pound steel mass falling 20 inches to strike an anvil and cause penetration
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer of a 1.5-inch diameter cone seated in the bottom of a hand augered borehole. The
(Sower DCP) ASTM STP-399 blows required to drive the embedded cone a depth of 1-3/4 inches have been
correlated by others to N-values derived from the Standard Penetration Test (SPT).
The thread can barely be rolled and the lump cannot be formed when drier than the
Low
plastic limit.
The thread is easy to roll and not much time is required to reach the plastic limit. The
Medium thread cannot be re-rolled after reaching the plastic limit. The lump crumbles when
drier than the plastic limit.
It takes considerable time rolling and kneading to reach the plastic limit. The thread
High can be re-rolled several times after reaching the plastic limit. The lump can be
formed without crumbling when drier than the plastic limit.
Table 7: Plasticity
Stratified Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers at least ½ inch thick.
Laminated Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers less than ¼ inch thick.
Fissured Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little resistance to fracturing.
Slickensides Fracture planes appear polished or glossy, sometimes striated.
Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further
Blocky
breakdown.
Inclusion of small pockets of different soils, such as small lenses of sand scattered
Lensed
through a mass of clay.
Homogeneous Same color and appearance throughout.
Table 9: Structure
Page | A-8
KEY TO HATCHES
Table 1: Key to Hatches Used for Boring Logs and Soil Profiles
Page | A-9
BORING LOCATION PLAN
Page | A-10
B-02
B-01
B-04 B-05
P-02
P-01
B-03
Boring Location
Piezometer Location
N.T.S. 06/12/2017
SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILES
Page | A-11
S N
A A' B-
01
02
B-
560 560
03
B-
N B-01 Qu
550 6 550
N B-03 Qu 4 0.5
N B-02 Qu Site Map Scale 1 inch equals 135 feet
5 1 20 4 0.75 Explanation
13 18 2
4 1.75
15 3.75 AR=Auger Refusal
16 3.75 21 4.5
ELEVATION (feet)
17
18 3.5
19 4.25 Topsoil Fill
530 530
50+AR=18.5
20 3.5
54 Aggregate
USCS Low
ALDOT PROFILE BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
520 520
Concrete
27
Water Level Reading
at time of drilling.
2 Water Level Reading
after drilling.
510 510 0 37
12
490 490
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions
Birmingham, AL
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 JOB NUMBER PLATE NUMBER DATE
04 05
B- B-
550 550
N B-04 Qu
N B-05 Qu
8
6 10
7 1.25
3 0.5
3 0.5
17
540 14 540
19 4.5
11 3 Site Map Scale 1 inch equals 60 feet
Explanation
15 4
18 AR=Auger Refusal
ELEVATION (feet)
530 530
14 4 PPqu=Unconfined compressive strength estimate
12 2.5 from pocket penetrometer test (tsf)
20 3.25
15 2.25
Topsoil Fill
520 520
USCS Low
ALDOT PROFILE BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
Limestone
Plasticity Clay
510 510
480 480
Ramsay-McCormack Building Additions
Birmingham, AL
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 JOB NUMBER PLATE NUMBER DATE
Page | A-12
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-01 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 1 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
0.3 TOPSOIL = 3 inches 550.8
1 3-3-3 FAT CLAY (CH): medium stiff, brown and
550 1.5 red, moist, trace rock size fragments, trace 549.5
debris (glass fragments) Sample #2
2 2-2-2 (FILL) Liquid Limit (LL) = 34
LEAN CLAY (CL): medium stiff, reddish Plastic Limit (PL) = 14
brown, moist, trace rock size fragments Plasticity Index (PI) = 20
3 2-1-3
5
540
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
535
7 4-6-13
20
530
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-01 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 2 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
525
27.0 (RESIDUAL) 524.0
Groundwater encountered at
27 feet at time of drilling - tip
Auger Refusal at 27 feet of auger wet after auger
removal
30
520
35
515
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
40
510
45
505
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-02 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 1 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
0.3 GRAVEL SURFACE = 3 inches 546.8
1 13-10-10 FAT CLAY (CH): very stiff, dark brown and
1.5 reddish brown, dry, trace rock size fragments, 545.5
trace construction debris (asphalt fragments)
545 2 6-6-7 (FILL)
LEAN CLAY (CL): very stiff, reddish brown,
dry
reddish and yellowish brown with some gray,
3 6-8-7 trace rock size fragments
5
4 4-7-5
540
535
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
6 6-8-10
15
530
525
stiff, moist
8 3-4-6
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-02 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 2 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
520
hard, saturated
9 12-13-14 Groundwater encountered at
30 29 feet at time of drilling
515
soft
10 1-1-1
35
stiff
11 2-6-6
40
505
43.0 (RESIDUAL) 504.0
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-03 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 1 of 1 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
0.3 CONCRETE SLAB = 4 inches 547.7
0.8 BASE = 6 inches 547.2
FAT CLAY (CH): medium stiff, dark brown
1 2-2-3 2.0 and reddish brown, moist, trace rock size 546.0
fragments
(FILL)
545 LEAN CLAY (CL): medium stiff, light
yellowish brown, dry Sample #2
2 2-2-2 Liquid Limit (LL) = 24
5 Plastic Limit (PL) = 15
Plasticity Index (PI) = 9
very stiff, yellowish brown with some black
3 5-7-9
540
yellowish brown and gray
4 5-5-7
10
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-04 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 1 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
0.3 TOPSOIL = 4 inches 547.7
1 4-4-4 CLAYEY SAND (SC): loose, dark brown,
1.5 dry, trace roots, trace rock size fragments 546.5
(FILL) Sample #2
2 2-3-3 LEAN CLAY (CL): medium stiff, dark Liquid Limit (LL) = 29
reddish brown, moist Plastic Limit (PL) = 14
545 Plasticity Index (PI) = 15
soft
3 1-1-2
5
540
reddish and yellowish brown and gray, trace
5 7-9-10 rock size fragments
10
535
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
530
light brown and gray
7 5-5-9
20
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-04 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 2 of 2 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
Auger Refusal at 25 feet Run #1 25' - 27'8"
LIMESTONE, weathered, gray, hard, poor REC = 81%
REC=81
1 RQD=45 RQD = 45%
rock mass quality
Good water return
Run #2 27'8" - 32'8"
520 very poor rock mass quality REC = 97%
RQD = 13%
Good water return
30 REC=97
2 RQD=13
RQD = 68%
Good water return
40 REC=89
4 RQD=68
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-05 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 1 of 3 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
0.3 TOPSOIL = 4 inches 546.7
1 2-4-6 CLAYEY SAND (SC): medium dense, dark
1.5 brown and red, moist, some construction 545.5
debris (brick and concrete fragments)
545 2 6-4-3 (FILL)
LEAN CLAY (CL): stiff, dark red with some
black, moist, trace roots
soft, reddish and yellowish brown, trace sand Sample #3
3 1-1-2 size rock fragments Liquid Limit (LL) = 31
5 Plastic Limit (PL) = 14
Plasticity Index (PI) = 17
very stiff Little recovery - sample lost
4 4-6-8 out of spoon
540
535
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
530
7 4-6-6
20
525
8 3-3-12
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-05 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 2 of 3 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
520
28.0 (RESIDUAL) 519.0 Groundwater encountered at
Auger Refusal at 28 feet 27.5 feet at time of drilling
1 REC=91 Run #1 28' - 29'10"
RQD=0 LIMESTONE, weathered, gray, hard, trace
rust coating in fractures, very poor rock mass REC = 91%
30 quality RQD = 0%
Run #2 29'10" - 34'10"
REC = 55%
RQD = 0%
No water return
515 2 REC=55
RQD=0
35.0 512.0
35 Run #3 34'10" - 39'10"
CLAY SEAM = 5 feet
REC = 0%
RQD = 0%
No water return
510 3 REC=0
RQD=0
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
40.0 507.0
40 Run #4 39'10" - 44'10"
LIMESTONE, weathered, gray, hard, trace
rust coating in fractures, very poor rock mass REC = 25%
quality RQD = 0%
No water return
505 4 REC=25
RQD=0
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LOG OF BORING 5545 Derby Drive
Birmingham, AL 35210
Designation: B-05 Office: (205) 836-6300
Sheet 3 of 3 Fax: (205) 836-9007
www.BuildingAndEarth.com
10 20 30 40
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH (ft)
INCREMENT
GRAPHIC
Qu (tsf)
BLOWS
1 2 3 4
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PER
REMARKS
Atterberg Limits
20 40 60 80
% Moisture
20 40 60 80
LIMESTONE, weathered, gray, hard, trace Run #6 49'10" - 54'10"
rust coating in fractures, very poor rock mass REC = 0.03%
quality (continued) RQD = 0%
No water return
495 6 REC=0
RQD=0
485
LOG OF BORING 2 BH170134 RAMSAY-MCCORMACK BORING LOGS.GPJ BESI.GDT 6/12/17
65
480
70
Birmingham, AL Huntsville, AL Auburn, AL Columbus, GA Savannah, GA Raleigh, NC Tulsa, OK Springdale, AR Shreveport, LA Louisville, KY Niceville, FL
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES
A brief description of the laboratory tests performed is provided in the following sections.
POCKET PENETROMETER
Pocket Penetrometer tests were performed on cohesive soil samples. The pocket
penetrometer provides a consistency classification, and an indication of the soils unconfined
compressive strength (Qu).
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D2216)
Natural moisture contents (M%) were determined on selected samples. The natural moisture
content is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the weight of water in a given amount of
soil to the weight of solid particles.
Page | A-13
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
The results of the laboratory testing are presented in the following tables.
Soils with a Liquid Limit (LL) greater than 50 and Plasticity Index (PI) greater than 25 usually
exhibit significant volume change with varying moisture content and are considered to be
highly plastic. Soils with a LOI value greater than 3 percent are usually not suitable for
supporting building and pavement sections.
Compressive
Boring Sample Core Sample Recovery RQD
Run No. Strength (ksi) /
Location Depth (ft) Elevation (ft) (%) (%)
Depth
B-04 1 25-27.7 523-520.3 81 45 11.58 / 26.5’
B-04 2 27.7-32.7 520.3-515.3 97 13 -
B-04 3 32.7-37.7 515.3-510.3 95 51 14.62 / 36.5’
B-04 4 37.7-42.7 510.3-505.3 89 68 -
B-04 5 42.7-47.7 505.3-500.3 100 100 15.39 / 42.8’
B-05 1 28-29.8 519-517.2 91 0 -
B-05 2 29.8-34.8 517.2-512.2 55 0 -
B-05 3 34.8-39.8 512.2-507.2 0 0 -
B-05 4 39.8-44.8 507.2-502.2 25 0 -
B-05 5 44.8-49.8 502.2-497.2 10 0 8.065 / 39’
B-05 6 49.8-54.8 497.2-492.2 0 0 -
B-05 7 54.8-59.8 492.2-487.2 0 0 -
Table A-2: Rock Core Test Results
Page | A-14
ROCK CORE PHOTOGRAPHS
Page | A-15
B-04 Run #1 and 2 (25 to 32.8 feet)
Page | A-16
Google Earth Image of the Site dated 12/24/03
Page | A-17
18th Ave: Vs Model
-10
-20
-30
-40
Depth, ft
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
Shear-Wave Velocity, ft/s
18th Ave: Supportive Illustration
Dispersion Curve Showing Picks and Fit
6500
Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity,ft/s
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500 Calculated Dispersion
1000 Picked Dispersion
500
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Period, s
p-f Image with Dispersion Modeling Picks
Ave E: Vs Model
-10
-20
-30
-40
Depth, ft
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
Shear-Wave Velocity, ft/s
Ave E: Supportive Illustration
Dispersion Curve Showing Picks and Fit
6500
Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity,ft/s
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500 Calculated Dispersion
1000 Picked Dispersion
500
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Period, s
p-f Image with Dispersion Modeling Picks
SHAFT OUTPUT
Page | A-18
Tip Resistance/F.S. (tons)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
40
Depth (ft)
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Dia=2.5 ft
30
0
Side Resistance/F.S. (tons)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
17
Depth (ft)
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Dia=2.5 ft
30
0
Settlement (in)
0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0
100
200
300
400
500
Axial Load (tons)
600
700
800
900
1000
Dia=2.5 ft
11
1100
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS GEOTECHNICAL-
ENGINEERING REPORT
Page | A-19
Page | A-20