Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SAYO, JR.,
(a) March 1, 1989, Receipt No. 18062, covering sugar deposited by Rosa
Sy;
(b) March 7, 1989, Receipt No. 18080,Covering sugar deposited by RNS
Merchandising (Rosa Ng Sy);
(c) March 21, 1989, Receipt No.18081, covering sugar deposited by St.
Therese Merchandising;
(d) March 31, 1989, Receipt No.18086, covering sugar deposited by St.
Therese Merchandising; and
(e) April 1, 1989, Receipt No. 18087, covering sugar deposited by RNS
Merchandising.
HELD: yes. Art 1520 new civil code which provides that the creditor whose
debtor is the owner of a negotiable document of title shall be entitled to
such aid from courts of appropriated jurisdiction by injunction and otherwise
in attaching such document or in satisfying the claim by means thereof as
is allowed at law of in equity in regard to property which cannot readily
attached upon by ordinary legal process.
In this case Luis t Ramos and Crezencia zoleta obtain loan to the
petitioner secured by quedans. Both of the debtor failed to pay their
obligation to the petitioner hence the petitioner has the right to forfeit the
the mortgage in their favor the satify their claims.
2. Whether the non-payment of the purchase price for the quedans by the
original vendees rendered invalid the negotiation by vendees/first
indorsers to indorsers and the subsequent negotiation of Ramos and
Zoleta to PNB.
1. HELD: The non-payment of the purchase price does not render the
subsequent negotiation invalid. The validity of the negotiation in favour
of PNB cannot be impaired even if the negotiation between Noah and its
first vendees was in breach of faith on the part of the vendees or by the
fact that Noah was deprived of the possession of the same by fraud,
mistake or conversion if PNB paid value in good faith without notice of
such breach of duty, fraud, mistake or conversion. (Article 1518, New
Civil Code).
In this case the petitioner PNB where entitled to delivery of the deliver
of sugar covered by the quedans due to the failure of their debtor to fulfill
their obligations. However they have to pay warehouseman’s lien and other
lawful charges as petitioner is bound to stand by the express terms and
condition of the face of warehouse receipts as to the payments of lawful
charges and warehousemen’s lien.
Ramos and Zoleta failed to pay their loans upon maturity. Hence, PNB
wrote to Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery demanding delivery of the sugar stocks
covered by the quedans endorsed to it by Zoleta and Ramos. Noah's Ark
Sugar Refinery refused to comply with the demand alleging ownership
thereof.
It alleged that the owner of Noah’s Ark, Looyuko, entered into an
agreement with RNS and St. Therese Merchandising to sell the sugar
indicated in the warehouse receipts stored in Noah for an amount of
P63,000,000. Checks were issued but they were dishonored for being
drawn against insufficient funds.
PNB filed with the RTC of Manila a verified complaint for "Specific
Performance with Damages and Application for Writ of Attachment" against
Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery, Alberto T. Looyuko, Jimmy T. Go and Wilson T.
Go, the last three being identified as the sole proprietor, managing partner,
and Executive Vice President of Noah's Ark, respectively.
HELD: NO sec 29 or warehouse receipts law sub sec (b) how to the lien
may be lost (b) by refusiong to deliver the good when a demand is made
with which is bound to comply under the provisions of this act. In rel to
sec31 WRL warehouseman need not to deliver until lien is satisfied.