Just the facts, for a change A New Zealand magazine

6ODFOTPSFE
)BSE
/FXT

)JTUPSZ
t
'PSCJEEFO
4DJFODF
8IBU
:PVS
%PDUPS
8JMM
/FWFS
5FMM
:PV
t
4VQQSFTTFE
*OWFOUJPOT

0UIFS
%JTDPWFSJFT

'"$5
5IFSF
BSF
OP
QJDUVSFT
TIPXJOH
UIF
IVHF
#PFJOH

UIBU
TVQQPTFEMZ
DSBTIFE
JOUP
UIF
CVJMEJOH

8IBUFWFS
EJE
IJU
UIF
1FOUBHPO
UPPL
PVU
KVTU
UIF
mSTU
nPPS
PG
UIF
JNQBDU
BSFB
BOE
MFGU
MJUUMF
EFCSJT
o
OP
FOHJOFT

XJOHT
UBJM
GVTFMBHF
CMBDL
CPYFT
FUD


FI
26&45*0/


8IZ
EJE
UIF
8BTIJOHUPO
%$
N
D
'JSF
$IJFG
TBZ
IF
EJE
OPU
LOPX
XIFSF
UIF
TH
XSFDLBHF
XBT
&WFO
UIF
MBXO
XBT
WJSUVBMMZ
E
B
QSJTUJOF
BGUFS
UIF
DSBTI
t
8IZ
XBT
UIF
WJEFP
O
EI
GPPUBHF
PG
UIF
FWFOU
DPOmTDBUFE
CZ
UIF
N
G
'#*
"OE
XIZ
EJE
%POBME
3VNTGFME
BU
mSTU
!
TBZ
UIBU
iB
NJTTJMFw
IJU
UIF
CVJMEJOH
t

*T
JU

USVF
UIBU
B
QPXFSGVM
HSPVQ
PG
8BTIJOHUPO

%$
JOTJEFST
BDUVBMMZ
DBMMFE
GPS
B
iOFX
1FBSM

)BSCPSw
JO

%JE
UIFTF
QFPQMF
HFU
XIBU

UIFZ
XBOUFE

t

*G
TP
XIBU
EPFT
UIJT
NFBO

GPS
/FX
;FBMBOE
UP
TBZ
OPUIJOH
PG
UIF
SFTU
PG

UIF
XPSME

FULL STORY INSIDE, PLUS SPECIAL REPORTS ON:

MAMMOGRAMS • Can they actually cause breast cancer?
VACCINE ROULETTE • The MeNZB™ campaign of deceit
SECRET NZ HISTORY • The proof of pre-historic civilisations in NZ
PETROL • Is “Peak Oil” the biggest energy scam since the 1970’s?
FLOWING WATER ON MARS? • Astonishing ESA colour photos
US “BLACK OPS” • Poisoning NZ skies with “Chemtrails” ISSN 1177-0236

Spring 2005 Volume 1 Number 1 ... MUCH more inside

SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY PRICE – $NZ 9.95 $A 8.95 $US 7.95 SAMPLE BARCODE
JUST THE FACTS, FOR A CHANGE

Now that you know what you’ve

been missing, you won’t want to
miss a single issue of UNCENSORED
UNCENSORED IS THE NEW NEW ZEALAND QUARTERLY Just the facts, for a change A New Zealand magazine

THAT ACTUALLY TELLS IT LIKE IT IS. We’re totally

dedicated to bringing you the unfettered, unvarnished
6ODFOTPSFE
)BSE
/FXT

)JTUPSZ
t
'PSCJEEFO
4DJFODF
8IBU
:PVS
%PDUPS
8JMM
/FWFS
5FMM
:PV
t
4VQQSFTTFE
*OWFOUJPOT

0UIFS
%JTDPWFSJFT

FACTS about politics, society, science, medicine, history

and technology. '"$5
5IFSF
BSF
OP
QJDUVSFT
TIPXJOH
UIF
IVHF
#PFJOH

UIBU
TVQQPTFEMZ
DSBTIFE
JOUP
UIF
CVJMEJOH

8IBUFWFS
EJE
IJU
UIF
1FOUBHPO
UPPL
PVU
KVTU
UIF
mSTU
nPPS
PG
UIF
JNQBDU
BSFB
BOE
MFGU
MJUUMF
EFCSJT
o
OP
FOHJOFT

XJOHT
UBJM
GVTFMBHF
CMBDL
CPYFT
FUD


FI
26&45*0/


8IZ
EJE
UIF
8BTIJOHUPO
%$
N

No spin, no axe to grind. Just the facts, for a change.

D
'JSF
$IJFG
TBZ
IF
EJE
OPU
LOPX
XIFSF
UIF
TH
XSFDLBHF
XBT
&WFO
UIF
MBXO
XBT
WJSUVBMMZ
E
B
QSJTUJOF
BGUFS
UIF
DSBTI
t
8IZ
XBT
UIF
WJEFP
O
EI
GPPUBHF
PG
UIF
FWFOU
DPOmTDBUFE
CZ
UIF
N
G
'#*
"OE
XIZ
EJE
%POBME
3VNTGFME
BU
mSTU
!
TBZ
UIBU
iB
NJTTJMFw
IJU
UIF
CVJMEJOH
t

*T
JU

UNCENSORED is a quarterly, so if you subscribe now you

USVF
UIBU
B
QPXFSGVM
HSPVQ
PG
8BTIJOHUPO

%$
JOTJEFST
BDUVBMMZ
DBMMFE
GPS
B
iOFX
1FBSM

)BSCPSw
JO

%JE
UIFTF
QFPQMF
HFU
XIBU

UIFZ
XBOUFE

t

*G
TP
XIBU
EPFT
UIJT
NFBO

won’t have to pester your newsagent every three months

GPS
/FX
;FBMBOE
UP
TBZ
OPUIJOH
PG
UIF
SFTU
PG

UIF
XPSME

as to when he (or she) is expecting our new issue. We

FULL STORY INSIDE, PLUS SPECIAL REPORTS ON:
MAMMOGRAMS • Can they actually cause breast cancer?
VACCINE ROULETTE • The MeNZB™ campaign of deceit

are offering a one year’s subscription (4 big issues, each SECRET NZ HISTORY • The proof of pre-historic civilisations in NZ
PETROL • Is “Peak Oil” the biggest energy scam since the 1970’s?

over 100 pages long) at a SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY

FLOWING WATER ON MARS? • Astonishing ESA colour photos
US “BLACK OPS” • Poisoning NZ skies with “Chemtrails” ISSN 1177-0236

PRICE of only $40 (includes p/h).

Spring 2005 Volume 1 Number 1 ... MUCH more inside
SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY PRICE – $NZ 9.95 $A 8.95 $US 7.95 SAMPLE BARCODE

COMING IN FUTURE ISSUES:

FUEL SAVERS THAT REALLY WORK • THE CROP CIRCLE ENIGMA – HOAX OR QUANTAM
PHYSICS? • SUPPRESSED ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPICS • LOST TECHNOLOGY • DIY
SOLAR HEATING/COOKING • WHAT YOUR DOCTOR WILL NEVER TELL YOU, HOW AND WHY
THE NZ ‘EDUCATION SYSTEM’ IS DUMBING DOWN OUR KIDS, and much more...

Yes! Please send me a subscription to UNCENSORED for ( ) years at the SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY PRICE OF ONLY
$40 per year (4 big issues per year). BULK ORDERS: Bulk orders of this irst COLLECTORS EDITION of UNCENSORED
are available. Ten (10) or more copies are just $7 each (includes shipping and handling charges). Please send me ( )
COPIES. PAYMENT BY CHEQUE: I enclose my full payment of ($ )

CREDIT CARD ORDERS ONLY: Name on credit card (please print) :_______________________________________

CREDIT CARD DETAILS: [_____ Amex] [_____Bankcard] [_____Mastercard] [_____Diner] [____Visa]

NUMBER _ _ _ _/_ _ _ _/_ _ _ _/_ _ _ _/ EXPIRY DATE: ____ / ____

Name ................................................................................. Clip and mail to:

UNCENSORED
Address ............................................................................. PO BOX 44-128
AUCKLAND
City ......................................................Email..........................................................

2
 Welcome
This is Issue Number One of UNCENSORED, the first New Zealand magazine
dedicated to breaking through all the hype, spin and distortions to the REAL
STORY, aka THE TRUTH. We believe that it’s high time New Zealanders were
treated to information and opinion uncontaminated by vested interests.

Each issue will bring you vital information all too often ignored, distorted,
suppressed – or just plain censored by mainstream media. Thus, much of, if not
most of the material in these pages will be new for many people.

The editors and publisher of UNCENSORED respect your intelligence. We

believe that New Zealanders are more than just “consumers” and that we as a
nation deserve better than corporate gloss, spin and “infotainment”. Truthful reporting and honest analysis have
the potential to change people's lives for the better. Indeed, for many people, the right information at the right
time can prove to be life-saving.

We realise that some of the articles in UNCENSORED may upset some people, as long-held beliefs of some
readers are challenged. As one of our overseas editors, former NASA astronaut and UNCENSORED Contributing
Editor, Dr Brian O'Leary, has said, "The truth will set you free; but first it will piss you off". But if something is
true ... well, it’s true. If we don’t face up to it, how do we then meet our responsibilities as thoughtful, feeling,
empathetic people?

We hope that reading UNCENSORED will be an interesting, and enlightening experience, bringing our readers a new
appreciation of historical and contemporary events – and future possibilities. We hope you enjoy the magazine.

COVER STORY – SEE PAGE 28

he oicial trigger for the invasion of Iraq and Afghaniston
and the “war on terror” was the 19 “Muslim terrorists”, who
supposedly hijacked four passenger aircraft (with boxcutters, no
less!) and lew two of them in the World Trade Centre and one
into the Pentagon. However, in the last few years the oicial
story has been falling apart as serious researchers (as well as
some former Bush insiders) have been looking carefully into
what really happened on 9/11. What they all have concluded
is that one of the most audacious criminal acts of all time was
perpetrated on that fateful day in September.

But it wasn’t 19 Arabs who did it.

Our Website: www.uncensored.co.nz

Publisher: Steve Crow

Discussion is welcomed through our website and the letters section (next issue). We encourage cross Editor: Jonathan Eisen
Assistant Editor: Katherine Smith
examination and verification of all our information sources. If you feel you have a constructive addition to Published by: Uncensored
make please visit our forum and contribute. There you will also find updates, references and many more Publications Ltd
new items of interest added regularly. Contributing Editors: Dr Robert
Anderson, Wolf Brinsbury,
Dr Gary Cook, Mikey Havoc,
Disclaimer: Dr Brian O’Leary, Stuart Troy
Any statement of fact or purported statements of fact contained in this publication
Proofreading: Bryan Jewell
do not necessarily relect the views or opinion of the Owner, Publisher, Editors or
Design Layout: Full Court Press
Employees and any liability in respect thereto is limited accordingly. We vet all magazine
Address: PO Box 44-128, Auckland,
content. However, publication of an article or advertisement does not constitute
New Zealand
endorsement by the Owner, Publisher, Editors or Employees. his publication may
Telephone: + 64 9 525 6808
not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without written permission irst
Email: info@uncensored.co.nz
having been obtained. All rights reserved © 2005 Uncensored Publications Ltd.

3
 Winter/Spring 2005 • Volume 1 Number 1

PERSPECTIVES, EdIToRIalS and ColumnS

6 Steve Crow: Why unCEnSoREd?
7 Jonathan Eisen: Welcome to Reversal World
10 mikey Havoc: not Guilty

FEaTuRES
26 The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts Revealed
46 SPECIal REPoRT on dEPlETEd uRanIum
56 Chemtrails: What on Earth is Going on in the Sky?
58 InTERVIEW with david lange: Is nZ an Elected dictator-
ship?
# Evidence for Pre-historic new Zealand Civilisations

FoRbIddEn SCIEnCE
70 naSa’s biggest Suppressed discovery So Far
76 “big bang Theory” overturned by the Facts
76 Is The “Peak oil” Scare Just another Industry Scam?
## booK EXCERPT: GE: The Final Pollution
92 nuclear Power Is The Problem, not The Solution

WHaT YouR doCToR WIll nEVER TEll You

95 death by medicine
97 menZb ™ Vaccine Campaign of Fear – The $200m Scandal
101 The Rotten Tooth about Fluoride
103 Can Your Toothpaste Cause alzheimer’s?
104 The Great mammography Hoax
103 marijuana Shrinks Tumours
108 Confessions of a Vaccine Scientist

ComEdY
114 God’s marketing Questionnaire

REVIEW
114 9/11: The Road to Tyranny

4
INTRODUCTION

"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have."
– Richard Salant, former President of CBS News

the myth of a free press

฀
It is now more apparent than ever that we in “western” societies no longer have a genuinely free press, and that our
press is more subtly and rigidly controlled than we ever imagined. We were taught to believe that press censorship
existed only in totalitarian dictatorships like those in Nazi Germany and the USSR. However, we are quickly
learning – thanks in no small measure to the resources now available on the Internet – that in our so-called “free
societies” the press (including radio and TV) have largely become functionaries of the political and corporate elites
and an indispensible part of their controlling agenda. hanks to independent journalists writing on sites like www.
rense.com, prisonplanet.com, infowars.com, scoop.co.nz and so many others, we are learning that much of what our
controllers call “conspiracy theory” is turning out to be distressingly factual – and that no amount of spinning can
change that. he following quote, from 52 years ago, is today more relevant than ever:

"T here is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America,
as an independent press. You know it and I know it. here is not
one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you
know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for
keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of
you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would
be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking
for another job.

If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper,

before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. he business of
the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to
fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his
daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an
independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the
scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our
talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We
are intellectual prostitutes."

– John Swinton, former chief of staf, he New York Times, in a 1953

speech before the New York Press Club

5
Why UNCENSORED?
By Steve Crow
Do you believe that the
politicians and bureaucrats
you entrust with guiding and
regulating your lives always
work in your best interest?
Do you always believe what
you read or hear in the
media? Do you think you
live in a real democracy or a
free country? Do you believe
our elected politicians run
your country and its assets as
mandated?
If your answer to all these questions is
not a very resounding NO! then you
need to seriously re-evaluate your belief
systems.
I hope UNCENSORED will help you
do this by providing you with the
unvarnished facts about issues, people
and events that inluence our lives. In
addition we will bring you the facts
on the cover-ups, misinformation,
disinformation, injustices and out-right
lies perpetrated on us by those in so-
called “positions of power” and their
coalitions of willing accomplices.
UNCENSORED is simply about
presenting the facts, exposing the naked
truth and “outing” those who seek to
corrupt or hide it from us for their own
purposes. We will provide you with the
information needed to make an objective
assessment to decide what is the truth
regarding the issues raised.
A major reason for launching
UNCENSORED is to use it as a means
of exposing hypocrisy in the people and
institutions that seek to control our lives.
We live in an elected dictatorship ruled
(and I use that word deliberately) by
thousands of bureaucrats whose main
purpose in life is to limit our freedoms
and “GST” (Grab, Snatch and Take) our
hard-earned dollars the better to provide
themselves with ever increasing power
and resources to feed and preserve their
own ever-increasing numbers. hey do
this in part by controlling what we hear,
read or view.
I want to change that.
"he system” has become a bloated
and arrogant bureaucracy deliberately
interfering with our lives, oten where it
Steve Crow is the Publisher of UNCENSORED
is not wanted or needed – at our cost?
Why do we put up with it? Why don’t we
exert more control over them and make
them more accountable? Why are we
and disinterest in anyone else’s opinion of
scared of them?
their decisions.
I truly believe that the best thing any For example, did you know that:
government can do for us is to leave us
he Oice of Film & Literature
alone. Beyond their role of providing for
Classiication (the Censor’s oice)
society’s educational, welfare, health and
applies a diferent set of rules to
other genuine needs surely their main
gay as opposed to heterosexual
obligation is to respect the wishes of
“pornography”.
those who empower and pay them.
Simply put, as a “pornographer”, I am
Does it not logically follow then that allowed to release gay porn which
there is something seriously wrong with a contains much “harder” content than
“system” that ignores the... would ever be permitted in straight porn
– despite the fact that a very signiicant
• 70% of New Zealanders who said proportion (and I am not one of them)
NO to GE of our population still views gay sex as
• 92% of New Zealanders who said unnatural, immoral and degrading.
NO to cutbacks in our Fire Service
his may or may not be because our two
• 90% of New Zealanders who
top censors are gay – you decide.
wanted stifer sentencing for violent
criminals But wait, there's more, and in the coming
• 80% of New Zealanders who wanted issues of UNCENSORED we will
a referendum on abolishing our use uncover the truth about some of the most
of the Privy Council... to mention important issues of our time.
but a few examples.
Our hope is that by increasing public
awareness of the facts, however
Many of you may be aware of the more
unpopular or unpleasant they may be,
“colourful” side of my business as New
UNCENSORED will help lessen the hold
Zealand’s largest importer and distributor
“the system” has over all our lives.
of adult entertainment products and
owner of the Erotica Lifestyles Expo. My UNCENSORED is all about Freedom of
business activities regularly bring me into Speech – as that greatest of all defenders
conlict with the “powers” that attempt of freedom of speech, Hustler Publisher
to tell us what we may and may not do or Larry Flynt, says, “freedom is only
view in this country. meaningful if it includes all speech, no
matter who is ofended by it....”
I am continually amazed by the sheer
idiocy and hypocrisy of our legislation
and those charged with implementing it
– not to mention their total arrogance
6
 E D I T O R’ S I N T R O D U C T I O N
Welcome to
“Reversal World”
Jonathan Eisen
he handsome young man on the telly
says that an international “blue ribbon”
panel of scientists has warned that
– absent some seriously fundamental
change in the very near term – our
entire biosphere will fail as a life support
system.
Everything is collapsing, they report, and
the pace of the collapse is increasing.
he handsome young man then
interviews the co-leader of the Green
Party, asking her what she thinks we
can do to help avert this impending
catastrophe. She replies we should all
drink tap water out of a plastic drink
bottle instead of buying more bottled
water. She says that this will help “save
the landills” for other things – like more
old mattresses or hair dryers and cat
litter.
he handsome young man smiles his
boyish winning smile, thanks her “very
much indeed” for her time, then breaks
to commercial. Sexy young people in
small bathing gear romp around a beach,
jiggling their amplebody parts and
drinking expensive sugar water.
he handsome young man returns with
the next bunch of stories about some
new farm thing, a possibly dangerous
diet craze, a drug bust, whatever.
Excuse me? What’s going on here?
As I see it, the answer is quite simple:
Unspeakable, unprecedented disaster
is on its way thanks to human greed,
proligacy, waste, indolence – the entire
System itself. But hey, no worries! It’s
easy: Just drink our toxic tap water out of
a plastic bottle!
No worries?
I’m worried. If the co-leader of the Green
Party which is made up of people who
really care deeply about the planet, is
dozing, what does that say about all the
others who really don’t give a damn?
And what about our vaunted “free
press”? If they are as complicit as
they are compliant, what the hell will
it take then to awaken a slumbering
population? What will it require to rouse
a people so addicted to denial that we
can’t “get” the fact that the very system
we have bought into so completely and
so unquestioningly, and whose values we
unconsciously accept – is actually killing
us?
Have we grown so addled, neurotic and/
or drugged, so unable to think clearly,
that we simply can’t relate simple facts
anymore to our daily lives?
Or, more sinister: is it that we think
the truth no longer matters, that it’s
ultimately not that important?
Perhaps it's because in our frantically
materialist society, truth has become
relative – as in “it might be true for
you, but not necessarily for me”
– a false supposition that has spawned
our neurotic and ultimately tragic
indiference.
hus, we never really acknowledge that
we are sleepwalking our way to oblivion,
dulled as we are by our drugs, television,
religion, our “possessions” and our
“normality”. Don’t believe it? OK, then
try this:
• When we learn THE FACT that our
medical system is the second leading
7
cause of death in this and other western
countries, do we then stop taking our
“prescription”? Do we rise up indignantly
against a medical establishment we
actually pay to kill us and our loved ones
– or do we just go to sleep on this, just
another “inconvenient” fact?
• When we learn THE FACT that
our so-called “democracies” illegally
invaded two sovereign countries based
on “intelligence” cooked up to conform
to the Bush/Cheney/Blair New World
Order agendas, do we take to the streets
angry at being so blatantly manipulated.
Do we boycott US and UK companies?
Or do we run from the facts and ignore
the obvious.
• When we learn THE FACT that the
government is legally poisoning our
water supplies with a carcinogenic
industrial waste product (luoride), do
we march on our city councils?
Or do we just sleep, make excuses and go
shopping.
Brave New World is upon us. We have
become so well adjusted and accustomed
to the pleasures of turning of the mind,
of ignoring the obvious, we can no
longer connect with reality.
Who then needs a dictator when our
minds are on permanent vacation? And
when a dictator does in fact come along,
it makes no diference if he can’t put
together a simple sentence in his native
language, or that he needs to be wired to
get “the answers” beamed to his earpiece
in presidential debates.
We have been well truly primed and
ready to believe the lies – so long as
they came from “credible” sources like
our schools, our “leaders”, TV, he NY
Times, or he NZ Herald. hat these
sources of “the truth” had become
gatekeepers, players in the game of
suppression of the truth instead of the
disseminators of the truth, has largely
escaped our attention. Moreover, we
believe these sources when they say that
anyone with serious questions about the
tightening, corrupting grip of the New
World Order is simply a “conspiracy
theorist”.
We believe because we have the deep
need to belong, to be accepted, loved and
“well regarded”. We believe because it is
easier.
“Reversal World”
Over the centuries entire societies
– their spirit continually beaten down
by various ruling elites – have gradually
come to accept the twisted logic of
“Reversal World”.
In this world, institutions function
in precisely the opposite way to their
ostensible purpose. hus, our education
system dumbs down the kids; our media
manipulate us rather than enlighten
us; our religions teach hatred, war and
exclusivism. In our Orwellian world,
our “freedom” becomes slavery; our
justice system is for “just us” rich
folks. Democracy becomes an “elected
dictatorship”, and our “scientiic”
medical system which is supposed to
help heal us – becomes our second
leading cause of death.
In “Reversal World” we turn a blind eye
to these absurdities of our existence and
just try to get on with life, believing that
the consequences, if they come at all, will
somehow be postponed to some distant
future.
Consequences
hese days, however, the consequences
of our sellouts are rapidly gaining on
us. With every decision we have made
to go along with the hypocrisies of our
misguided “leaders”, we have helped to
create a world of increasingly blatant
barbarism, a place where the truth
simply is denied. Consequently, here in
“Reversal World” we are dying from and
killing for these lies and from these lies,
while most of us still don’t “get it” that
we have allowed ourselves to become
both victims and executioners at the
same time.
In the last century, the Pavlovian-
based (Does the name “Pavlov” ring a
bell?) behaviouralists in the new “social
sciences” re-discovered something that
the Catholic Church (and others) had
known for iteen hundred years or
more: namely that appropriately well-
timed rewards and punishments could
transform people from their designated
roles as functioning, multi-dimensional,
sentient, thinking, spiritual beings – into
mindless followers, consumers and
automatons, politically correct “Group
thinkers” whose supreme achievement is
that they can “get along with others”.
hus we have become a people happy
to surrender our most fundamental
git – independence of mind – to the
“authorities”: doctors, teachers, popes,
kings, queens, presidents, corporations,
even “products”.
Money see, money do.
For millions of us, thanks to all the fear-
inducing genocide, torture and “terror
alerts”, various cultural horror shows,
traic, violent video games, desperate
unemployment, meaningless
employment, mortgages and chronic
health problems – life simply became
too much for us to handle. So we
retreated into our acceptable shells, our
“comfort zones”.
Aping the materialism of our “betters”
up the power pyramid, we went along
with the iction that success in life
equated with the accumulation of wealth
and “power”, and ignored our own best
instincts of what that meant.
8
We learned well the lesson that it
just doesn’t pay to question authority.
Especially when going along with the
“Reversal World is so much easier.
Believe the authorities, went the
refrain, because to not believe leads to
the uncharted territory of independent
thought.
And now most of us are so attenuated, so
self-censored – the word “abbreviated”
comes to mind – that we don’t even
notice that in our Brave New “Reversal
World”, nothing we do makes sense. Little
wonder that so many millions of adults
are on Prozac and our children are on
Ritalin.
How censorship really works
Censorship isn't only concerned with
banning porn, books, or violence.
Censorship wears many masks and
comes excused with many rationales.
It can insinutate itself into everyday life.
It can lurk in the mind of the average
careerist who simply wants to “get
ahead” in the organisation, and doesn't
wish to “rock the boat”.
It is present when a student refrains from
asking an uncomfortable question of a
teacher from whom he/she needs a good
grade in order to get a good job in order
to pay of the student loan.
It can, of course, come overtly as a
“requirement of national security” or
merely a family court judge’s shutting
down the press coverage of a story that
could irritate the medical hierarchy.
From childhood on, we learn to “couch”
what we say, relegating the value of truth
to the back burner, while elevating other
values like “getting ahead”, or "being
accepted".
But whatever its mask, censorship
emanates from concepts that cannot
logically be defended – such as one
group of people (an elite) mandating
what should be seen, heard and thought
by another group of people (the rest of
us).
While censorship oten hides behind
sweet reasonableness and rewards for
our compliance, sometimes the velvet
glove is removed and “authority” is
revealed for what it really is. It is then
we feel the fear that authority ultimately
relies on to keep you and me and billions
of others in line.
he tragic result is that throughout
history, but rarely more so than now,
we have unwittingly held ourselves back
from our true potential as co-creators
in evolution itself. Most frightening,
though, many of us actually believe the
lie that our true potential was probably
never all that attainable anyway.
So now we follow the dark agenda
of those whose primary aim in life is
control, and we have learned to hate and
fear and turn on ourselves and others as
we turn of our potential for love, trust
and “the good”.
Most of us still don’t realise that when
we bought the lie that the truth is only
for suckers, we censored ourselves
from the vastness of our possibility.
By surrendering our priceless heritage
of independence of mind, we actually
slid backwards in our own evolution,
dumbing ourselves down (and our
children as well) for the “greater good”
of those who would control us for their
own status, power, ego and wealth.
And thanks to the fact that we have
accepted the cynicism of our materialist
elites, our entire species is now rapidly
embracing hanatos (the death
force), wantonly killing, maiming and
destroying each other, and indeed the
planet itself. hus we now see impotence
and depression and degradation as
“normal”.
“I refuse to believe I’m living in denial” –
used to be a funny little quip. Now it
has become the centre of the materialist
authoritarian mind-controlling culture
itself. Deep within our comfort zones,
we cheerfully (or neurotically) go along
with the lies that not only is nothing
sacred any longer – nothing really matters
anyway. In this concept, power, material
wealth, status and ego are the only things
that are real, and everything else is ...
somehow not.
Not art, not music, philosophy, God, or
love. Censorship thus stands revealed
as totally joyless and cut of from the
stuf of life. Censorship, then, is on a
permanent death trip in that it has no
meaning other than its own personal
aggrandisement – a futile and pointless
exercise of the terminally insecure.
Because the root of censorship is
deception for power’s sake, censorship
has no truth in itself. As such it daily
digs the grave of our potential for
discovery and REAL enlightenment with
its petulant, ugly and repeated insistence
that it knows better than we do, knows
what we should and should not see, hear,
read or think.
It assumes that it even knows better than
Life itself.
Hope springs eternal
• First, let’s face the fact that just
drinking our toxic tap water from a
reillable bottle is deinitely not enough
to get us through.
• Only when we “get” that we are living
in a delusion, can we then actually start
to wake up to how stupid we have let
ourselves become.
• his awareness enables us to free
ourselves from the mind control of those
who have transformed so much of the
world into a living nightmare, and have
helped to cripple our ability to think and
act outside their insanely destructive
square.
• We then can realise that we have the
choice to opt out of “reversal world”. We
can refuse to go along, refuse to buy,
or do anything that isn’t healing for
people and the planet. We can boycott
all their useless, addictive products
and start living a life that has love at its
centre rather than money, status, ego
and “power”. he more conscious (and
happy) we become, the more we can
recognise the lies we have accepted for
what they are, and can simply refuse to
accept them any longer.
9
• We can begin to attain fulilment in the
moment as we reward ourselves for being
authentic and progressively more real,
conscious and (dare I say it) empowered.
• We can turn of the life-denying crap
on TV and start reading really good
books again, making useful and beautiful
things, talking with each other, sharing
good times and ideas, walking barefoot
– and not particularly caring what other
people think of us as we become aware
of the terrible price we have paid for our
conformity.
• We can then start trusting the
perfection of the universe, and stop
trying to “improve” it for monetary gain.
We can start trusting each other again,
because we become trust-worthy.
• As we reduce our needs to the
essentials – good health, loving friends
and family – we realise that our most
basic need is to make this lifetime one
that is not wasted.
Take heart, then. Millions of us have
already begun this journey and are in the
process of saving the planet, as we save
our own lives and those of our children,
one truth at a time.
At that point – the point when we
refuse to obey the dictates of “Reversal
World” – no one can control our minds
anymore. We become free to become
who we really are.
Welcome to our irst issue.
Who we are NOT...
UNCENSORED is not ailiated with
any group, political party or ideology.
We are not addicted to our (or any
one else’s) perspective. We do not
defend a position, but see real hope
and ultimate happiness in the free and
open interchange of ideas. We’re an
independent lot. We think that the way
we will create an enlightened society is
for each of us to create it in our lives.
If you disagree (or agree) with what
you read in UNCENSORED, and wish
to have your say, write us a letter and
we will make our best eforts to print it
(and/or put it on our website).
We welcome your original editorial
contributions and strongly encourage
you to submit your material to us
electronically.
O P- E D
Not Guilty.
Mikey Havoc
Not so long ago, a big arrogant
country called the United States of
America invaded a country called
Iraq. he United States announced
they were at War with Iraq.
But it was not a War.
It was an invasion, and people around
the world, angry and scared by this,
demanded to know just how the US
thought it had the right to storm into
a country and rip and bomb it to
shreds.
Not used to having their authority
questioned, the US came up with
some lame excuses but none that
seemed ind them any allies in
their rotten project until they said
they had “intelligence” proving
that WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION were being built in
Iraq.
Deaths, injuries, torture, human
rights abuses, propaganda, hatred,
pain and sufering. It was all on.
So can you imagine, ater convincing
everybody that the Iraqi WMD’s were
so dangerous, just how the American
administration felt when the world
started demanding solid proof that
these WMD’s even existed?
Whoopsie. Sprung. How were they
going to get out of this one?
Michael Jackson to the rescue!
Michael Jackson was arrested on
Mikey Havoc is the well known voice of reason and sanity on
radio bFM in Auckland, as well as an intrepid stirrer of the soup.
He is a Contributing Editor of UNCENSORED
November 20, 2003 with much
hullabaloo. All over the world the
media trumpeted the story with
obvious delight. So as easy as you
please Jackson’s arrest stole the
headlines from the emerging news
that there were no Iraqi WMD’s. Only
American ones, and Israeli ones and
British ones, though apparently their
ones didn’t count.
As he King of Pop found himself
cufed – and the victim of what
we would eventually ind were
unfounded allegations – the
government of the United states of
America was having to come clean to
the world and admit that, in fact there
were NO WMD’s in Iraq. Nor was
there any evidence of any.
It was all a Big Lie. At irst they
claimed that it came ‘bad intelligence’.
Now we know better, since the
famous “Downing Street Memos”
came out which showed that Bush
and Blair “cooked” the intelligence to
suit their agenda.
Most of us would do everything
in our power not to cause pain to
innocent people. In Iraq thousands
of people have died, and thousands
more will die, from the bully tactics
used by the US. Tactics, like the use of
so-called “Depleted Uranium”, which
may haunt them for decades to come.
Wagging the dog
We now know Jackson was also the
victim of dodgy evidence and baseless
10
accusation, and his trial, I believe,
was a smokescreen to divert attention
away from the dirty deeds concerning
the US invasion.
Jackson’s story was a non-story. He
didn’t do it. But the papers sure did
act as though he did. Just look back
at the weak so-called evidence , the
publicity surrounding the trial, the
coverage and the facts. It was a sham.
Is it so hard to believe that the same
Americans who admitted to making
up information which sparked of the
unfathomable horror of war, would
use their might to create a glitzy
gossip fest about a wacky singer to
divert attention from their fuck ups?
Jackson’s arrest hogged the media
for a long time. In fact by the time
the invasion had happened, all the
major attacks were completed and
the Iraq people were allowed to elect
a new US friendly government, the
actual Jackson trial itself was only just
beginning. he election was expected
to cause an angry and violent reaction
from Iraq’s people. Jackson’s trial
started 2 days before. Once again ...
diversion tactics.
Hi my name is Mikey Havoc and I
am a Conspiracy heorist. Maybe
you have a problem with that?
Perhaps you now imagine me as a
muttering paranoid nutter? Too bad.
hink what you like. Having a theory
on something is a good thing. I’m
allowed to have one, and so are you.
We are all allowed to think. At least
up until now. So when Glaxo Smith Kline admit
that of the top end drugs they
Recently, thinking for oneself has produce and recommend to doctors
kind of become... unfashionable. to prescribe to patients, only 20-30%
Somehow with manipulation as gentle even work – I am concerned. (*When
as it is brazen, certain institutions I challenged Glaxo Smith Kline to
have inluenced the common discuss this on my radio show they
perception of what is right and what became unreachable for 2 weeks. hey
is wrong – Fox News being the most diverted all their incoming calls to an
gobsmackingly answerphone or their
obvious (watch PR company.)
the fantastic doco “I can only imagine
Outfoxed –you’ll how much time I When the whole
be astounded at country including the
would have had for
how easily they government, is conned
lie). Furthermore thinking about other into believing that NZ
should cover ever things in my life, if I is in the middle of an
be blown, anyone epidemic and a vaccine
who asks questions
had never have had supplier manages to
or demands to worry about what unload tens of millions
accountability stupid selish thing of dollars worth of
is belittled and unsafe, untested,
discredited. his George W Bush was questionably efective
works because the up to each day.” vaccine into the arms
bullys are bigger and of all NZer’s under 20
have more to lose. – it’s worth speaking
up. Someone somewhere has received
I think what I think, because 200 million dollars of public money
experience has shown me that people from our government – us! – for a
and groups of people lie. Lie to cover dangerous product they sold using
their own pathetic guilty asses. falsiied information. And kids are
Deceit at the expense of others is still dying. Some people will bullshit
deplorable. As the world grows older good and hard for that kind of
those who choose to deceive get more unexpected bucket of cash. Imagine if
craty, and want as I may to not have instead we allocated $1,000,000 each
to worry about it, I do worry and I do for 200 schools.
react.
When the legendary, outstanding
Maybe it’s because I don’t believe Oscar and Palm D’or winner Michael
that anyone has the right to think of Moore gets written of as a poor
themselves as better than anyone else. ilmmaker by enough media whores
to start making lots of people who
I would much prefer having fun or have never seen his genius movies
sitting around on my ass enjoying life thinking it too – I want to react.
and people, not worrying about these
things. I can only imagine how much And I cannot pretend not to notice
time I would have had for thinking when, ater a few hours on my radio
about other things in my life, if I had show, discussing the dangers of soy
never have had to worry about what protein and the shity way these
stupid selish thing George W Bush dangers are covered up by certain
was up to each day. groups in the food industry, 95bfm
received phone calls from 4 (!)
Unfortunately I cannot do that diferent PR companies demanding
because I happen to have developed transcripts of what was said.
a great zest for life and living. I care
about the preservation of our species On Radio bfm we discuss a lot of
and the planet we live on. Idealistic, controversial things but nothing had
perhaps, but hey, the other options caused anywhere near that sort of
suck. level of panic before and, interestingly,
nothing has since. So I kept digging
11
for information. (* Sanitarium
threatened the station and me with
a whopping great lawsuit over it but
we called their bluf and demanded
the answers to 3 questions regarding
the safety of soy protein. Never heard
back from them. Hmmmm.)
I continue looking into this stuf
because over the years I am
labbergasted by just how much of it
is not made up by kooks but in fact
has proven to be quite real indeed. I
wish I could say it was otherwise but
I can’t. Liars, conmen, doublecrossers
and scheming selish pricks abound.
As for Michael Jackson, he was not
guilty, but solely due to the way his
arrest and trial were covered by the
mainstream media most NZer’s were
convinced he was. (*Leighton Smith
went on air saying “Not Guilty, well
maybe not guilty in front of THAT
jury...” What?) Hunt down the trial as
reported by MJJ Source – the oicial
MJ fan club. hey had transcripts
each day of the trial painting a
diferent picture from that of most
media reports. hat is until they were
banned for no reason from the court
and from publishing the transcripts .
Hmmmmm? Odd don’t you agree?
Lesson: Watch your news sources
carefully , challenge each and
everything they say. hink about who
beneits from your seeing or hearing
each thing. If your gut instinct is
telling you something is not quite
right, dig deeper. Perhaps you will
ind out that you were worried for
no reason, or perhaps you will come
up with something that we would all
beneit from knowing.
It’s not “crazy” or a “waste of time” to
try to ind out what the facts really
are. hose are tags created by the
people who are getting up to no good
to dissuade you from knowing the
truth. Have a think. Keep an eye on
what the people we are expected to
trust, actually do and say.
Always question who beneits here.
And don’t let anyone make your
decisions for you.
You may ind it worthwhile. I do.
 PERSPECTIVES

Parrot’s Conformity effects

eloquence found in the brain
By Sandra Blakeslee - New York Times
stuns A new study uses advanced brain-scanning technology to cast light
science on a topic that psychologists have puzzled over for more than half a
century: social conformity.

he study was based on a famous series of laboratory experiments

By Alex Kirby - BBC News
from the 1950's by a social psychologist, Dr. Solomon Asch.

he inding of a parrot with an almost unparalleled power to communicate with In those early studies, the subjects were shown two cards. On the irst
people has brought scientists up short. was a vertical line. On the second were three lines, one of them the
same length as that on the irst card.
he bird, a captive African grey called N’kisi, has a vocabulary of 950 words, and
shows signs of a sense of humour. He invents his own words and phrases if he is hen the subjects were asked to say which two lines were alike,
confronted with novel ideas with which his existing repertoire cannot cope – just as
something that most 5-year-olds could answer correctly.
a human child would do.
But Dr. Asch added a twist. Seven other people, in cahoots with the
N’kisi’s remarkable abilities, which
researchers, also examined the lines and gave their answers before
are said to include telepathy,
feature in BBC Wildlife the subjects did. And sometimes these confederates intentionally
Magazine. N’kisi is believed to gave the wrong answer.
be one of the most advanced
users of human language in Dr. Asch was astonished at what happened next. Ater thinking hard,
the animal world. three out of four subjects agreed with the incorrect answers given by
the confederates at least once. And one in four conformed 50 percent
About 100 words are of the time.
needed for half of all reading
in English, so if N’kisi could Dr. Asch, who died in 1996, always wondered about the indings.
read he would be able to cope Did the people who gave in to group do so knowing that their
with a wide range of material. answers were wrong? Or did the social pressure actually change their
perceptions?
Polished wordsmith
he new study tried to ind an answer by using functional M.R.I.
He uses words in context, with past, present and future tenses, and is oten inventive.
One N’kisi-ism was “lied” for “lew”, and another “pretty smell medicine” to scanners that can peer into the working brain – a technology that
describe the aromatherapy oils used by his owner, an artist based in New York. was not available to Dr. Asch.

When he irst met Dr Jane Goodall, the renowned chimpanzee expert, ater
seeing her in a picture with apes, N’kisi said: “Got a chimp?” He appears to fancy
himself as a humourist. When another parrot hung upside down from its perch, he
commented: “You got to put this bird on the camera.”
Dr Goodall says N’kisi’s verbal ireworks are an “outstanding example of interspecies
communication”. In an experiment, the bird and his owner were put in separate
rooms and ilmed as the artist opened random envelopes containing picture cards.
Analysis showed the parrot had used appropriate keywords three times more oten
than would be likely by chance.
his was despite the researchers discounting responses like “What ya doing on the
phone?” when N’kisi saw a card of a man with a telephone, and “Can I give you a
hug?” with one of a couple embracing.
Professor Donald Broom, of the University of Cambridge’s School of Veterinary
Medicine, said: “he more we look at the cognitive abilities of animals, the more
advanced they appear, and the biggest leap of all has been with parrots.”
Alison Hales, of the World Parrot Trust, told BBC News Online: “N’kisi’s amazing
vocabulary and sense of humour should make everyone who has a pet parrot
consider whether they are meeting its needs. hey may not be able to ask directly,
but parrots are long-lived, and a bit of research now could mean an improved
quality of life for years.”
he researchers found that social conformity showed up in the brain
as activity in regions that are entirely devoted to perception.
But independence of judgement — standing up for one's beliefs
— showed up as activity in brain areas involved in emotion, the study
found, suggesting that there is a cost for going against the group.
"We like to think that seeing is believing," said Dr. Gregory Berns, a
psychiatrist and neuroscientist at Emory University in Atlanta who
led the study.
But the study's indings, he said, show that seeing is believing what
the group tells you to believe. he research was published June 22 in
the online edition of Biological Psychiatry.
"It's a very important piece of work," said Dr. Dan Ariely, a professor
of management and decision making at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, who was not involved in the study. "It suggests that
information from other people may colour our perception at a very
deep level."
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/science/28brai.html

12
 Ex-medical journal editor Anti-ageing
Breakthrough?
reveals drug firms’ dirty tricks A troupe of elderly dancing rats has opened
Ian Johnston - Science Correspondent
up the prospect of rejuvenating ageing
humans.

Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), has exposed a Researchers gave a combination of two
series of tricks used by drug irms to ensure good publicity for new products in natural chemicals available in health
prestigious journals. He said it was oten impossible for editors of the journals to food shops to rats, which in human years
spot a rigged trial - despite the process of “peer review” where research is checked were septuagenarians.
independently - and also highlighted a “conlict of interest” because publishing trials
by major drug companies would result in increased sales. he researchers found that combined
together, the two chemicals “tune-up”
the mitochondria, energy-generating power
he Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry denied the allegations, saying plants in cells.
it would make no sense to rig trials because they would eventually be “found out”.
Writing in the online journal PLOS [Public Library of Science] Medicine, Mr Smith, Evidence has been accumulating that
who is now chief executive of private irm United Health Europe, said action should deterioration of the mitochondria is an
be taken to ensure journals were not becoming “an extension of the marketing arm of important cause of ageing. his is thought
pharmaceutical companies”. to be largely due to the production of free
radicals, destructive molecular particles
“A large trial published in a major journal has the journal’s stamp of approval, will released as a by-product of metabolism,
which damage DNA and disable enzymes.
be distributed round the world and may well receive global media coverage,” he said.
“For a drug company, a favourable trial is worth thousands of pages of advertising. he process can be compared with the way
nuclear power stations produce dangerous
“he companies seem to get the results [in trials] they want not by iddling the results, radioactive waste in return for cheap
which would be far too crude and possibly detectable by peer review, but rather by energy.
asking the ‘right’ questions.” Mr Smith listed various scams including testing a drug
against an inferior treatment, testing the company’s new product against too high or he supplement combination was found to
too low a dose of another drug, conducting trials on too small a scale or picking and mop up the free radicals in mitochondria
choosing positive results. while boosting the activity of a damaged
enzyme, carnitine acetyltransferase, which
helps the “power plants” burn fuel.
“he evidence is strong that companies are getting the results they want and this is
especially worrisome because between two-thirds and three-quarters of the trials “With the two supplements together, these
published in the major journals – Annals of Internal Medicine, he Journal of the old rats got up and did the Macarena,” said
American Medical Association, Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine – are chief scientist Dr Bruce Ames, from the
funded by the industry,” Mr Smith said. he igure was less for his former publication, University of California at Berkeley.
the BMJ, at about a third, he said.
“he brain looks better, they are full of
Editors whose suspicions were aroused might also be compromised by the need to energy - everything we looked at looks
more like a young animal.”
make money. “Publishers know that pharmaceutical companies will oten purchase
thousands of dollars’ worth of reprints [of the magazine],” Mr Smith said. he chemicals used in the experiment were
acetyle-L-carnitine and alpha-lipoic acid,
“An editor may thus face a frighteningly stark conlict of interest: publish a trial both of which are normally found in the
that will bring $100,000 [£54,000] of proit or meet the end-of-year budget by iring body’s cells. Acetyle-L-carnitine is sold as
[someone].” He said more clinical trials should be publicly funded and journals an energy-booster and alpha-lipoic acid as
should stop publishing them and instead concentrate on critical analysis. an antioxidant with anti-ageing efects.

However, the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry denied results were hree research papers on diferent animal
studies of the chemicals published in
being rigged. “In the long run, it’s not in a company’s interest to make claims they
the journal Proceedings of the National
know to be untrue,” a spokesman said. “here’s no future in twisting trials’ results Academy of Sciences investigated the
because you’ll get found out long before you get to market, and with the costs of biochemical action of the supplements,
lawsuits and so on, it’s just not worth getting it wrong.” compared the behaviour of old and young
rats, and tested the memory of animals fed
No-one from the Lancet was available for comment. Fiona Godlee, editor of the the compounds.
BMJ, welcomed Mr Smith’s comments, adding that “the BMJ takes the issues of
transparency very seriously. We continue to call for public registration of all clinical http://www.ananova.com/yournews/story/
trials and full disclosure of results, regardless of outcome”. sm_523499.html

http://news.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=536012005

13
 The cold, hard facts
about gun control
Does gun control reduce violent crime? This open letter from an Australian police officer
verifies that there is no correlation. In fact, in countries such as Switzerland, where gun
ownership is mandatory, there is little violent crime, as compared to some countries with gun
control. In Michael Moore’s film Bowling for Columbine, the Canadian city of Windsor, located
across the river from Detroil, has a very low level of violent crime, as compared to Detroit with
similar demographics. Moore ignores the fact that Canadian gun ownership rates are higher
than those in the US, with far less violent crime.

From: Ed Chenel, A police oicer in Australia

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in

Australia were forced by a new law to surrender
640,381 personal irearms to be destroyed by
their own government, a programme costing
Australia taxpayers more than $500 million
dollars.

he irst year results are now in: Australia-wide,

homicides are up 3.2 percent, Australia-wide,
assaults are up 8.6 percent; Australia-wide,
armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes,
44 percent)! In the state of Victoria alone,
homicides with irearms are now up 300 percent.
(Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned
them in, the criminals did not! – and criminals
still possess their guns!)

While igures over the previous 25 years showed

a steady decrease in armed robbery, this has
changed drastically upward in the past 12
months, since the criminals now are guaranteed
that their prey is unarmed. here has also been
a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults on
the elderly.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain

how public safety has decreased, ater such
monumental efort and expense was expended in
"successfully ridding Australian society of guns."
You won't see this on the American evening
news or hear your governor or members of the
State Assembly disseminating this information.

he Australian experience proves it. Guns in the

hands of honest citizens save lives and property
and, yes, gun-control laws afect only the law-
abiding citizens.

Take note New Zealanders, before it's too late!

14
President Jimmy Carter secretly authorised $500 million to create an international
terrorist movement that would spread Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia and
"destabilise" the Soviet Union.
Former US national security
advisor admits American
government created the
Muslim “terrorist” movement
To understand the lie of
what Blair/Straw/Hoon call
the "outstanding success"
in Afghanistan, read the
work of the original author
of Total War, a man called
Zbigniew Brzezinski, who
was President Carter's
National Security Adviser
and is still a powerful force in
Washington.
Brzezinski not long ago revealed that on
July 3, 1979, unknown to the American
public and Congress, President Jimmy
Carter secretly authorised $500 million
to create an international terrorist
movement that would spread Islamic
fundamentalism in Central Asia and
"destabilise" the Soviet Union.
he CIA called this Operation Cyclone
and in the following years poured $4
billion into setting up Islamic training
schools in Pakistan (Taliban means
"student").
Young zealots were sent to the CIA's
spy training camp in Virginia, where
future members of al-Qaeda were taught
"sabotage skills" – terrorism.
Others were recruited at an Islamic
school in Brooklyn, New York, within
sight of the fated Twin Towers.
In Pakistan, they were directed by British
MI6 oicers and trained by the SAS.
he result, quipped Brzezinski, was "a
few stirred up Muslims" – meaning the
Taliban.
At that time, the late 1970s, the American
goal was to overthrow Afghanistan's
irst progressive, secular government,
which had granted equal rights to
women, established health care and
literacy programmes and set out to break
feudalism.
When the Taliban seized power in 1996,
they hanged the former president from a
lamp-post in Kabul.
His body was still a public spectacle when
Clinton administration oicials and oil
company executives were entertaining
Taliban leaders in Washington and
Houston, Texas.
he Wall Street Journal declared: "he
Taliban are the players most capable of
achieving peace. Moreover, they were
crucial to secure the country as a prime
trans-shipment route for the export of
15
Central Asia's vast oil, gas and other
natural resources."
NO AMERICAN newspaper dares
suggest that the prisoners in Camp X-Ray
are the product of this policy, nor that
it was one of the factors that led to the
attacks of September 11.
Nor do they ask: who were the real
winners of September 11?
he day the Wall Street stockmarket
opened ater the destruction of the
Twin Towers, the few companies
showing increased value were the
giant military contractors Alliant Tech
Systems, Northrop Gruman, Raytheon
(a contributor to New Labour) and
Lockheed Martin.
As the US military's biggest supplier,
Lockheed Martin's share value rose by a
staggering 30 percent.
Within six weeks of September 11, the
company (with its main plant in Texas,
George Bush's home state) had secured
the biggest military order in history: a
$200 billion contract to develop a new
ighter aircrat. he greatest taboo of all,
which Orwell would surely recognise,
is the record of the United States as a
terrorist state and haven for terrorists.
his truth is virtually unknown by the
American public and makes a mockery
of Bush's (and Blair's) statements about
"tracking down terrorists wherever they
are".
hey don't have to look far.
Florida, currently governed by the
President's brother, Jeb Bush, has
given refuge to terrorists who, like the
September 11 gang, have hi-jacked
aircrat and boats with guns and knives.
Most have never had criminal charges
brought against them.
Why? All of them are anti-Castro
Cubans. Former Guatemalan Defence
Minister Gramajo Morales, who was
accused of "devising and directing
an indiscriminate campaign of terror
against civilians", including the torture
of an American nun and the massacre of
eight people from one family, studied at
Harvard University on a US government
scholarship.
During the 1980s, thousands of
people were murdered by death
squads connected to the army of El
Salvador, whose former chief now lives
comfortably in Florida.
he former Haitian dictator, General
Prosper Avril, liked to display the
bloodied victims of his torture on
television. When he was overthrown,
he was lown to Florida by the US
Is it Brave New World or 1984?
A succinct comparison
between the prophecies of
Orwell and Huxley...
We were keeping our eye on 1984. When
the year came and the prophecy didn’t,
thoughtful Americans sang sotly in
praise of themselves. he roots of liberal
democracy had held. Wherever else the
terror had happened, we, at least, had not
been visited by Orwellian nightmares.
But we had forgotten that alongside
Orwell’s dark vision, there was another
– slightly older, slightly less well known,
equally chilling: Aldous Huxley’s Brave
New World. Contrary to common belief
even among the educated, Huxley and
Orwell did not prophesy the same thing.
Orwell warns that we will be overcome by
an externally imposed oppression. But in
Huxley’s vision, no Big Brother is required
to deprive people of their autonomy,
maturity and history. As he saw it, people
will come to love their oppression, to
government, and granted political
asylum.
A leading member of the Chilean
military during the reign of General
Pinochet, whose special responsibility
was executions and torture, lives in
Miami.
he Iranian general who ran Iran's
notorious prisons, is a wealthy exile in
the US.
One of Pol Pot's senior henchmen, who
enticed Cambodian exiles back to their
certain death, lives in Mount Vernon,
New York.
What all these people have in common,
apart from their history of terrorism, is
that they either worked directly for the
US government or carried out the dirty
work of US policies.
he al-Qaeda training camps are
kindergartens compared with the world's
leading university of terrorism at Fort
Benning in Georgia. Known until
recently as the School of the Americas,
its graduates include almost half the
adore the technologies that undo their
capacities to think.
What Orwell feared were those who
would ban books. What Huxley feared
was that there would be no reason to ban
a book, for there would be no one who
wanted to read one. Orwell feared those
who would deprive us of information.
Huxley feared those who would give us
so much that we would be reduced to
passivity and egoism.
Orwell feared that the truth would be
concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth
would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.
Orwell feared we would become a captive
culture. Huxley feared we would become
a trivial culture, preoccupied with some
equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy,
and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As
16
cabinet ministers of the genocidal
regimes in Guatemala, two thirds of
the El Salvadorian army oicers who
committed, according to the United
Nations, the worst atrocities of that
country's civil war, and the head of
Pinochet's secret police, who ran Chile's
concentration camps.
here is terrible irony at work here. he
humane response of people all over the
world to the terrorism of September 11
has long been hijacked by those running
a rapacious great power with a history of
terrorism second to none. Global
supremacy, not the defeat of terrorism, is
the goal; only the politically blind believe
otherwise.
he "widening gap between the world's
‘haves’ and ‘have nots’, says a remarkably
candid document of the US Space
Command, “presents new challenges
to the world's superpower and which
can only be met by ‘Full Spectrum
Dominance’ – dominance of land, sea, air
and space.”
Huxley remarked in Brave New World
Revisited, the civil libertarians and
rationalists who are ever on the alert
to oppose tyranny “failed to take into
account man’s almost ininite appetite for
distractions”.
In 1984, Huxley added, people are
controlled by inlicting pain. In Brave New
World, they are controlled by inlicting
pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that
what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared
that what we love will ruin us.
SENT BY:
fred woody <joat44@yahoo.com>
http://integralnaked.org/forum/tm.asp?m=27792&
p=1&tmode=1&smode=1
 C U LT U R A L PAT H O L O G I E S
The religious right:
pushing a deadly addiction
by Carolyn Baker
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8856.htm
According to www.dictionary.com,
an addiction is deined as 1: “being
abnormally tolerant to and dependent
on something that is psychologically
or physically habit-forming (especially
alcohol or narcotic drugs)
[syn: dependence, dependency,
habituation] 2: an abnormally strong
craving 3: (Roman law) under
Roman law addiction was the
justiication for slavery”
For over seventy years,
Twelve-Step programs have
addressed issues of addiction
not only to substances such
as alcohol, drugs, and food,
but to behaviours such
as compulsive gambling,
shopping, and even
working. Ater a number
of responses from former
fundamentalist Christians
to a previous article, I began
investigating Twelve-Step
groups which address issues
of religious compulsion
and spiritual abuse. One
group I discovered was
Fundamentalists Anonymous
(F.A.) and its Twelve Steps.
(http://www.geocities.com/
church_of_hank/fundamentalists_
anonymous.html)
However, before I examine
those steps, I would like to
further deine the terrorist
and tyrannical aspects of Christian
fundamentalism.
According to Merriam-Webster,
Christian fundamentalism is:
“a movement in 20th century
Protestantism emphasizing the literally
interpreted Bible as fundamental to
Christian life and teaching b: the beliefs
of this movement c: adherence to
such beliefs 2: a movement or attitude
stressing strict and literal adherence to a
set of basic principles.”
Any religion, philosophy, or belief
system can be addictive, fear-based,
and terrorising. If it is used to justify
changing the Constitution of the United
States and creating a society in which the
laws of that system are also fear-based
and terrorising, that system is both
terrorist and tyrannical.
My focus here is on fundamentalist
Christianity and Dominionism (the
desire to turn a country into a theocracy)
as religious systems which complement
and support tyrannical political systems,
speciically, fascism. I am well aware
that not all fundamentalist Christians,
and certainly not all people who call
themselves evangelicals, are of the
Dominionist variety. Many are hard-
working individuals who pay their
bills and follow the rules and attempt
to live the teachings of Jesus. I respect
17
those individuals and consider them a
mitigating force amid the onslaughts of
the religious right.
For an in-depth analysis of religious
right corruption and tyranny, I
highly recommend the recent article
“he Christian Maia” (http://www.
insider-magazine.com/
ChristianMaia.htm) by
investigative journalist,
Wayne Madsen.
My intention here is to
explore the addictive
features of these systems
which ultimately result not
in spiritual well being but
spiritual abuse.
Spiritual abuse is the
manipulation, exploitation,
and mistreatment – mentally,
emotionally, or physically
– of another individual or
masses of individuals, in the
name of promoting spiritual
principles or values. As we
have seen from the rampant
sexual abuse of children in
the Roman Catholic Church,
spiritual abuse can open the
door to every other kind of
abuse.
And just as a plethora of
Catholic priests for two
thousand years have used
their position of authority and piety to
abuse children, countless children in
fundamentalist Christian homes have
been beaten, raped, molested, shamed,
and emotionally devastated in the
name of “children obey your parents
in the Lord for this is right.” I suspect
that in the not-too-distant future, we
may see revelations of child abuse in
fundamentalist Christian homes and
churches break into the light of day that
could pale by comparison the abuse
scandal of the Roman Catholic Church.
For the fundamentalist Christian,
children too, born into “original sin”,
are to be dominated and made into
subservient born-again believers as soon
as possible.
Religious intoxication is an ancient
theme in human history. In fact, Carl
Jung would have called it an archetype
– a universal theme imbedded in the
human psyche that is found in all eras
and cultures. According to Jung, such
an archetype is not necessarily toxic or
pathological but points to an inherent
human craving for meaningful spiritual
experiences. Whether found in the spell
for the revival of Osiris, the orgiastic
rites of the cult of Dionysius in Ancient
Greece, or the Native American sun
dance, the need for sacred ritual and
celebration of the divine is as old as
human history. However, need and desire
are not the same as physical, emotional,
or mental dependence.
What makes a belief system, a ritual, or
one’s relationship with other adherents
addictive is the dependence one has on
them. Is one able to think for oneself? Is
one able to function without incessant
participation in the rituals, and without
obsessive contact with and validation
from fellow devotees? Is one able to
trust one’s intellect and emotions and
not subordinate them to those who
claim to have more spiritual authority,
deeper spiritual understanding, or more
extensive training in interpreting the
Bible or other sacred writings? Why do
I think that Christian fundamentalism
and/or Domininonism is an addiction?
My answer to that question comes irst
of all from my own experience, as well as
my observation of these individuals over
the years.
I recall my own dependency on what
“the Bible says” - my own inability
to trust my thoughts and feelings. I
remember the need for the “ix” of the
church service, the revival meeting,
the prayer meeting, the Bible study, or
listening to a iery sermon on tape. I
knew how to think on my own, but I
was afraid to do so. Who knew what I
might discover? But no “ix” was more
deliciously validating than “winning
souls for Christ”– that dramatic moment
when I had manipulated someone else
into a born-again experience. For this,
the fundamentalist Christian addict lives
and breathes. And this is precisely why
the religious right is intractably hell-
bent on converting the entire society
and system of government in America
to its fundamentalist theocracy. What
could produce a greater “high”? And if
this project should get interrupted by the
Rapture, the resulting euphoria would
be so well-earned doing God’s work and
getting the planet ready for Jesus’ return.
he adrenaline-drenched grandiosity in
such a scenario is palpably tantalising.
More addictive than heroin perhaps?
It is axiomatic in Christian
fundamentalism that without the born-
again experience, one cannot think
clearly.
"Being born into the
human condition,
and therefore,
being inherently
sinful, one’s mind is
deluded, clouded,
and always potential
putty in the hands of
Satan."
Once one has been born again, the mind
is magically transformed, and one is now
guided by the Holy Spirit who Jesus said
would lead his followers into all truth.
he more the born-again believer reads
and studies the Bible, the more clearly
and correctly he/she thinks. herefore,
the new convert to fundamentalist
Christianity must depend on his/her
minister, Bible teacher, evangelist, or
other spiritual leader to interpret the
Bible and guide him/her in living the
Christian life. Eventually, with years of
seasoning in the faith, one needs less
guidance, but one always requires regular
contact with the church, prayer group,
or Bible study circle because even ater
decades of devotion, there is always the
possibility that one could be deceived
by the devil. herefore, thinking for
oneself is out of the question, and as a
result, profound dependence on others is
created for producing the “answers” one
cannot discern by thinking for oneself.
In one of the responses to my last article,
one actively fundamentalist reader, whom
I am paraphrasing, stated that he does
look to the Bible for answers and asked
to whom or what else he should look
18
–Darwin, Camus, or other great minds?
I found the question itself very telling
because inherent in it is the assumption
that one cannot or should not trust
oneself. his assumption constitutes the
major underpinning of the addiction to
Christian fundamentalism, hence Step
One of Fundamentalists Anonymous:
1. I realise that I had turned control
of my mind over to another person or
group, who had assumed power over my
thinking.
he convert to fundamentalist
Christianity must be convinced that his/
her thinking is irreparably in error. he
underlying message is: “You don’t believe
the Bible is the inerrant Word of God
because your mind has been occupied
by Satan. his has happened principally
because you are a human being, but also
because you have made the enormous
mistake of trying to think for yourself. Of
course you think there are contradictions
in the Bible because Satan controls your
mind. If you surrender your mind to
Jesus (actually to me/us/the enlightened
lock of believers), you will understand
that there are no contradictions in the
Bible and that your life should be guided
only by the Bible and nothing else. What
you cannot now understand, you must
take on faith, and more will be revealed
to you later. It may not be revealed on
this earth, but by accepting Christ as
your personal saviour and having faith,
you will be guaranteed eternity in heaven
where everything you never understood
will be completely revealed to you.”
Curiously, as stated in the deinition of
addiction above, under ancient Roman
law, addiction was grounds for slavery. I
found this detail particularly signiicant
because obviously, addicted people are
“enslaved” people. Any thinking person
reading the Bible will discover dozens,
if not hundreds, of contradictions.
Moreover, any Bible student who also
studies history will discover massive
discrepancies regarding which books
were chosen to be in the Bible and why.
Studying that history reveals that the
decision to incorporate certain books and
exclude others was primarily a fourth-
century political decision intended to
strengthen the appeal of Christianity and
prevent its demise in the face of Rome’s
attempts to extinguish the religion.
An excellent analysis of this controversy
has been done by religious historian,
Elaine Pagels, in her book Beyond Belief.
She explores the discoveries of the Nag
Hammadi Library in Upper Egypt in
1945, which unearthed the existence of
numerous gospels eliminated from the
inal canon of the New Testament. Both
Pagels and another Biblical scholar,
Marvin Meyer, have analyzed the Nag
Hammadi writings and hypothesised the
reasons for their exclusion. I particularly
enjoyed reading Pagels’ Beyond Belief,
because not only does she analyse the
controversy surrounding the exclusion
of these Gnostic Gospels, but she openly
shares her own intellectual process of
discovering the signiicance of their
exclusion and its impact on her own
spirituality. Very UN-fundamentalist
indeed.
Reading the research of Pagels and
others makes clear the reality that the
Bible is not and cannot be the unerring,
impeccably-written, divinely dictated
Word of God that fundamentalist
Christians claim it to be. hus Step Two
of Fundamentalists Anonymous states:
2. hat person or group persuaded me of
the unerring nature of the Bible, in spite
of its many internal contradictions.
One of the most signiicant aspects
of my abandonment of Christian
fundamentalism was the awareness that
born-again Christians worship the Bible
and not God. hey argue that the only
way to know God is through the Bible.
hey are forced to believe this because
if they concede that God might “speak”
through an inner voice, through a tree,
or through a particular life experience,
their entire belief system is toast. When
I realised that contrary to their much-
touted Ten Commandments, Bible
worship is nothing less than “having
other gods before me”, I inally realised
the depth of the hypocrisy of their
system. Part of my, and anyone’s recovery
from fundamentalism is a commitment
to develop a relationship with a Higher
Power –whatever that may be – and not
with a book.
Step hree therefore states: 3. I became
addicted to the Bible as the supreme
focus of my faith, in spite of the
commandment that God should come
irst.
Like the spiritual inventory of Alcoholics
Anonymous and other Twelve-Step
programs, Step Four asks the recovering
fundamentalist to look at the damage
one has done to oneself as a result of
turning control of one’s mind over to
another person or group. Not a pretty
picture in most cases, but certainly a
huge relief when the whole truth is
inally faced and spoken.
4. I admit to God, to myself and to
another person the shortcomings of my
belief in the unbelievable.
Fundamentalist Christianity is illed
with false claims about the Bible. It
has to be in order to keep its system
intact and use the Bible to manipulate,
control, and above all, gain converts. So
as part of recovering from addiction to
fundamentalism, one must examine the
various false claims one has made about
the Bible.
5. I have made an inventory of my false
claims about the Bible.
19
Ouch! his could be very painful – and
it could go on for years as one recalls all
the times one may have used “the Bible
says” to beat up oneself or someone
else. But again, there can be profound
liberation with truth-telling. Could it get
more painful than Steps Four and Five?
Yes. How many minds have I
whacked beside my own? Who have
I manipulated, controlled, cajoled, or
conned by using false claims – things I
could never absolutely know or prove
about the Bible?
6. I have made a list of those whom
I led into confusion about the Bible.
All Twelve Step programmes require
“searching and fearless” inventories of
oneself and one’s actions while practising
one’s addiction. Moreover, they demand
accountability to one’s Higher Power,
oneself, and the persons harmed. his
could be excruciating! Admitting to
someone that I may have led them astray
with the Bible? As experienced Twelve-
Steppers know, it may not be possible to
make the amends in person or even by
letter. Someone may be so hurt, so angry,
so alienated that making contact with
him/her is not feasible. Most important,
however, is the admission to oneself.
Hence Step Seven:
7. I am willing to make amends to all
those whom I may have led astray.
And now comes the payof: sanity. Sanity
is not a mental health term but rather
a state of acceptance and release oten
attended by a sense of relief. Ater one
has admitted turning one’s mind over
to another person or group and has
faced the devastation the addiction has
caused, and if possible, made amends
to those harmed, it becomes possible to
experience sanity.
Step Eight:
8. I realise that I have the inner power
to restore sanity to my life and to search
Scripture for the truth. Notice the Step
says “search Scripture.” It doesn’t say,
search "the" Scripture. One now has the
freedom to search for one’s own truth
– wherever, whenever, however.
Having completed the irst eight Steps,
the recovering fundamentalist can
begin authentic relationships with
others regarding spirituality. No longer
does one need to “be right”, convert,
admonish, exhort, or teach. he irst
eight Steps make it possible to share on a
truly level playing ield without right/
wrong, either/or dichotomies.
Step Nine:
9. I will reach out to friends who can help
me clarify my thinking about the Bible,
God and Jesus.
Reaching out to friends is not the same
as dependence. It means information-
gathering, exploring, dialoging, but most
importantly, thinking for oneself.
hen brilliantly, Step Ten hastens to add
that I do not need to igure it out all on
my own; I can ask for help from a Higher
Power. It humbly implies that I don’t have
all the answers. I have help, but it is with
my own mind that I grasp the truth, not
with someone else’s.
10. I confess that only with God’s help
can my mind grasp the truth.
How do I get help from a Higher Power?
I practice Step Eleven which deals with
conscious contact with that power. his
may have nothing to do with reading
the Bible or going to church. It may have
nothing to do with meditating in a lotus
posture or praying in the traditional
sense. It may mean journaling, spending
time in nature, painting, composing
music or poetry.
11. I will seek through prayer and
meditation to improve my conscious
contact with God, praying for knowledge
of God’s will for me and the power to
carry that out.
One of the most profound aspects of
recovering from any addiction is the
compassion one experiences for others
who are still ensnared in the addiction.
One naturally wants to share the
liberation, peace, and sense of well being
that one has found with others who are
sufering. What might be particularly
challenging for the recovering
fundamentalist, however, is to share
the Twelve Steps of Fundamentalists
Anonymous without falling back into
one’s addiction to proselytise and “being
right.” So Step Twelve must be practiced
sensitively and compassionately.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening
as the result of these twelve steps, I will
ofer these steps to other former biblical
fundamentalists.
Some may argue that I am being
judgmental and lacking compassion in
this article and my former article on
Christian fundamentalism. However, I do
not apologise for being uncompromising
in my analysis.
As with all addictions, compassion for
the addict does not mean condoning
addictive behaviour. It means speaking
the truth about the addiction to the
addict him/herself, to the family and
loved ones involved with the addict, or
anyone else afected by his/her behaviour.
his is referred to in recovery circles as
an intervention. Is it not appropriate
for critically thinking individuals who
desire to live in a diverse and open
society to conduct “interventions” when
those drunk on Dominionism and
fundamentalist Christianity lagrantly
attempt to construct a theocracy which
requires everyone to be a born-again
Christian in order to thrive in that
society?
Do we not have a moral obligation
to confront destructive religious
intoxication that tears apart families,
communities, and nations? Hopefully,
this article is an example of such an
intervention.
he mainstream media does not
seem to comprehend the inherent
danger of the religious right let alone
report it accurately. All of us need to
challenge the addictive tyranny of
Christian fundamentalism at every
turn – for the sake of our sanity and
for the sake of our civil liberties. We
don’t allow street junkies into the halls
of Congress, the Supreme Court, or
the pulpits of America to admonish us
how we should live and why we should
demolish our Constitution. In fact, we
confront the insanity and criminality of
such individuals. Similarly, it’s time to
confront the domination drug for what
it is – a grave and perverse spiritual and
moral illness.
Carolyn Baker is recovering fundamentalist
Christian and an adjunct professor of history living
in Southern New Mexico. She can be contacted at:
cbaker@nmsu.edu Copyright (c) Carolyn Baker.
All rights reserved.
20
Creationist
Dinosaur
Museum
Opens in
Arkansas
By Paul Harris
he razor-toothed Tyrannosaurus rex,
jaws agape, loomed ominously over the
gentle hescelosaurus, looking for plants
to eat. Admiring the museum diorama
were old and young visitors, listening
on headphones to a stentorian voice
describing the primaeval scene.
But the Museum of Earth History is a
museum with a controversial diference.
To one side, peering through the bushes,
are Adam and Eve. he display is not an
image of the Cretaceous. It is Paradise.
‘hey lived together without fear, for
there was no death yet,’ the voice intoned
about Man and Dinosaur.
Nestling deep in the Ozark mountains of
Arkansas, in the heart of America’s Bible
Belt, this is the irst dinosaur museum to
take a creationist perspective. Already
thousands of people have locked to
its top-quality exhibits which mix high
science with fundamentalist theology
that few serious scientists accept.
he museum is riding a wave of
creationist inluence in America.
Creationism, which holds that the Earth
is just a few thousand years old and
the biblical account of Genesis is fact, is
central to a rash of furious arguments
across America. From school boards in
Kansas to elections in Pennsylvania,
the ‘debate’ between creationism and
evolution has become a political hot
potato.
Even as America’s scientists make
advances in palaeontology, astronomy
and physics that appear to disprove
creationism, Gallup surveys have shown
that about 45 per cent of Americans
believe the Earth was created by God
within the past 10,000 years. It is not just
creationism either. Last week NBC’s
Dateline current afairs programme,
equivalent to the BBC’s Newsnight,
investigated miracles. It concluded some
could be real. It is hard to imagine
Jeremy Paxman taking this stance.
hat wellspring of popular belief, and the
political clout that comes with it, is the
inspiration behind the museum. It is not
interested in debating with mainstream
science. It simply wants to represent the
view of a signiicant slice of America.
‘We want people to see that inally they
have something that addresses their
beliefs, to show that we do have a voice,’
said homas Sharp, business director of
Creation Truth, the religious group that
co-founded the museum.
No expense was spared. he fossil casts,
which range from a Triceratops skull to
an 18t-long Albertosaurus (a relative
to T. rex), could easily grace London’s
Natural History Museum. Plans for a
much bigger museum in Dallas are
advanced. ‘We would love to open in the
United Kingdom if the right partner
showed up,’ Sharp said.
he museum forms part of a Bible-based
theme park in Eureka Springs; the car
park is full of cars and coaches from all
over the country. To enter the museum
is to explore a surrealistic parallel world.
Biblical quotes appear on displays. he
irst has dinosaurs, alongside Adam and
Eve, living in harmony. he ferociously
fanged T. rex is likely to be a vegetarian.
hen comes the Fall of Man and an ugly
world where dinosaurs prey on each
other and the irst extinctions occur. he
destruction of the dinosaurs is explained,
not by a comet striking the Earth 65
million years ago, but by the Flood.
his, the museum says, wiped out most
of the dinosaurs still alive and created
the Grand Canyon and huge layers of
sedimentary rock seen around the world.
attractions are a mainstay of the local
economy.
It was built in co-operation with the ‘New
Holy Land’ theme park which re-created
the biblical Middle East in the Ozarks. A
huge statue of Christ, the largest in North
America, looms over Eureka Springs. he
site is the setting for he Great Passion
Play, where each night in a 4,500-strong
arena the last days of Christ are acted
out. he play has attracted more than 7.2
million people.
But creationism is seeking to become
more inluential in other parts of the
country. In Kansas the state school board
recently held public hearings on the
validity of evolution and the teaching of
‘Intelligent Design’ (ID) in classrooms.
he hearings were boycotted by scientists
who believed they were rigged against
evolutionists. he theory of ID holds
that the world is so complex it must
have been created, and has been dubbed
‘creationism lite’ by its critics. Kansas is
now expected to recommend schools to
include ID-friendly material in its science
courses this summer.
In Pennsylvania, the issue dominated
an election in the town of Dover ater
the school board decided to include
mention of ID in its science classes. A
vote last week between anti-evolution
and pro-evolution candidates ended in
an electoral tie.
Creationism has found one high-level
voice. President George Bush famously
proclaimed: ‘he jury is still out on
evolution.’ A CBS survey late last year
showed that 45 per cent of Bush voters
wanted creationism taught in schools
instead of evolution, compared to 24 per
cent of voters for John Kerry. ‘Under the
Bush presidency, we are clearly able to get
a lot more done,’ Sharp said.
he Museum of Earth History may be the
irst dinosaur museum of its kind. It is
not likely to be the last.
Guardian Unlimited (c) Guardian
Newspapers Limited 2005
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/
story/0,6903,1489520,00.html

Some dinosaurs survived on Noah’s ark.

One poster explains that Noah would
have chosen juvenile dinosaurs to save
space. An illustration shows two green
sauropods in the ark alongside more
conventional elephants and lions. he
inal exhibit depicts the Ice Age, where
the last dinosaurs existed with woolly
mammoths until the cold and hunting by
cavemen caused them to die out.

Scientists dismiss such claims as on a

par with believing in Atlantis. Yet the
museum is unlikely to be seen as a major
threat to mainstream science. It was put
in the heart of an area where Christian

21
Will the NZ government
ban “Hate Speech”? Some
inconvenient problems for
would-be censors
www.mediawatch.co.nz
While the news media’s attention was
distracted by the looming war on Iraq,
a parliamentary select committee was
aiming its own Stealth bomber attack at
New Zealanders’ freedom of speech.
In a report that received remarkably
little attention from the news media, the
Labour majority on the Government
Administration Committee recently
recommended amending the censorship
laws to outlaw what it calls “hate speech”.
he implications, not just for the media,
but for anyone with an interest in freedom
of expression are ominous, to say the
least.
Before we go any further, a brief historical
diversion. About six years ago a Christian
video distribution company named Living
Word imported two videotapes from
America. hose videos expressed views
that were understandably unpopular
with gay activists. One was that the gay
activist lobby was demanding not just
equal rights, but special rights; the other
was that homosexuality was a factor in the
spread of HIV and Aids.
Neither of these, you might think, qualiies
as an outrageous or even exceptional
proposition. Yet the videos ended up
before the Chief Censor, who considered
them so potentially “injurious to the public
good” that he imposed an R16 restriction.
Not satisied with that, a gay activist group
appealed to the Film and Literature Board
of Review, which declared the videos
objectionable in anyone’s hands.
his heady rush of political correctness
then seemed to infect the High Court,
which upheld the Review Board’s
classiication - although one of the two
judges involved had the decency to worry
out loud that they might be making inroads
into freedom of expression. You didn’t
have to be a hard-core libertarian to see
that as something of an understatement.
It took a full bench of the Court of Appeal
to restore some reason and common
sense to the situation by pointing out that
the censorship laws were supposed to be
concerned with depictions of activity,
such as sex and violence, rather than with
expressions of opinion.
It took a full
bench of the
Court of Appeal
to restore some reason
and common sense to
the situation by pointing
out that the censorship
laws were supposed to be
concerned with depictions
of activity, such as sex and
violence, rather than with
expressions of opinion.
he court held, in essence, that a
publication cannot be considered
objectionable under the censorship laws if
all it’s doing is expressing an opinion. he
court told the Film and Literature Board
of Review to think again, and this time to
take into consideration the Bill of Rights
Act which guarantees New Zealanders
– and I quote the right to “receive and
impart information and opinion of any
kind and in any form”.
he board subsequently cleared the
videos for general release. Well, it could
hardly do otherwise. But the board added
a peevish note to the efect that it was a
shame the law allowed no prohibition of
what it called “hate speech”. hat was the
cue for the government administration
22
select committee, which happened to be
undertaking a review of the censorship
laws at the time. When, the committee,
chaired by MP Diane Yates, issued its
report, oddly enough, the main thrust is
that the Films, Videos, and Publications
Classiication Act should be modiied to
encompass hate speech.
hat would mean politically incorrect
opinions, such as those expressed in the
Living Word videos, could be banned
without the pesky Court of Appeal getting
in the way. And the Chief Censor wouldn’t
have to bother himself with nit picking,
high-lown notions about freedom of
expression.
Interestingly enough, nowhere in the
report is any attempt made to deine
“hate speech”. It’s one of those wondrously
loaded phrases, like “social justice”, that
can mean whatever the user wants it to
mean. In the context of the committee’s
report, it seems to mean anything that
might ofend a minority group.
Presumably it would be let to the Chief
Censor to deine hate speech, and in so
doing to determine what New Zealanders
are allowed to say, see and hear. his places
unprecedented and dangerous power in
the hands of a bureaucrat and casts him in
the role of a commissar in Soviet Russia. It
also tugs the censorship laws in an entirely
new direction, and one that I suspect
Parliament never intended when it passed
the Act in 1993.
I note with some interest that the select
committee approvingly cites a submission
from the Islamic Women’s Council as
justifying a widening of the censorship
laws. We are forced to conclude from this
that Islam, with all its repressive strictures,
is now to be regarded as a model for a free
western democracy.
Every New Zealander who cares about free
speech should read this committee report,
along with every newspaper editor and
book publisher concerned about his or
her right to publish contentious opinions.
It shows just how casually some politicians
in a supposedly liberal democracy can
propose dismantling rights painstakingly
acquired over decades, even centuries.
Many people
assume that
hate speech
is easily and
objectively deined. But
experience proves that
it isn’t. In fact the term
covers a multitude of acts,
beliefs, and expressions
depending on who does
the deining.
he report will have been welcomed as
a victory by the gay activists who have
driven this issue. hey will see it as a rebuf
to the Court of Appeal which thwarted
them two and a half years ago. What they
perhaps fail to realise is that everyone in a
democratic society beneits from the right
of free speech – gay activists as much as
fundamentalist Christians. And moreover,
a state that allows fundamentalist
Christians to be silenced can just as easily
suppress the views of homosexual rights
groups.
I would like to inish with a question. In
determining whether something should
be censored, the Chief Censor is required
to decide whether it is injurious to the
public good. he question here is a simple
but important one: Can an opinion be
injurious to the public good? he select
committee and the Chief Censor obviously
think so. I would argue that suppression of
opinion is potentially far more injurious to
the public good in a democratic society.
To quote the British newspaper columnist
Bernard Levin: “Any legally permissible
view, however repugnant, is less dangerous
promulgated than banned.”
PUBLISHER’S NOTE: In New Zealand
the Chief Censor is gay and his
Deputy is a lesbian.
Hating Free Speech:
Is making words “illegal”
political correctness gone mad?
By Jim Peron
http://www.liberalvalues.org.nz
“Nigger.” “Kike.” “Faggot.” “Cunt.” Recently I went into one of these Christian
book shops – curiosity got the best of me.
Words. Words that ofend. In the new In that one shop I found books which
South Africa these words are illegal under degraded and attacked people for being
the category of being “hate speech.” But gay, Freemasons, Mormons, Jehovah’s
like all acts of censorship the deinition of Witnesses and several other groups. In my
the banned speech is diicult to determine. dealings with fundamentalist Christianity,
In some countries “hate speech” has been including attending a Baptist high school
so broadly deined as to ban any speech and Bible College, I found these people
which some protected group doesn’t like. infested with hatred for all sorts of people
– especially people of other faiths. Now do
Many people assume that hate speech these opinions express religious beliefs or
is easily and objectively deined. But hatred? In another shop I came across a
experience proves that it isn’t. In fact the fundamentalist Christian book attacking
term covers a multitude of acts, beliefs, Islam. Is this an expression of Christian
and expressions depending on who does beliefs or an attack on the dignity of
the deining. others?
Some would argue that expressions Let us assume that the banning of hate
of hatred which are intended to cause speech makes exceptions for religious
ofence are hate speech. But then how do groups. Aren’t we then faced with a
we know the intentions of the speaker? situation where hatred based on religion
Could they not be expressing an opinion is protected but non-religious views are
which they believe is factual without discriminated against? hese are the
“intending” to ofend anyone? Is a joke or inherent contradictions that lawmakers
a cartoon intended to incite hate - or is it must face when they attempt to set
merely an expression of someone’s sense themselves up as the inal arbitrators over
of humour? what people may express.
The Government is thinking
about banning “Hate Speech”...
Great idea, but why stop there?
Why not ban ALL “offensive”
speech. For example:
• Dislike speech that isn’t quite hate
• Fake stuttering
• Sarcastic speech
• Speech from another era that was once politically correct but which is now
politically incorrect
• Insincere speech
• Fake accent speech
• Pillow talk of all kinds
• Anti-Semitic speech that does not include Arabs – who are also Semitic
• Food-in-open-mouth speech
• Annoying telephone messages
• Grammatically incorrect speech
• Endless jokes with stupid punch lines
• Garbled speech by people with no teeth
• Signing by deaf people wearing mittens
Jon Eisen
23
In reality hate speech legislation is a tool
for political groups to oppress groups
which they do not like or oppose. It is
a way of using the coercive violence
of the police to restrict the political or
philosophical views of others. In Germany
Jewish groups succeeded in banning
any discussion about the magnitude or
nature of the Holocaust which challenges
prevailing opinion.
hus when English historian David Irving
said that the gas chambers currently on
display at Auschwitz were “recreations”
built ater the war, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and ined for hate speech. Yet the
head of the Auschwitz camp memorial has
publicly said the same thing and nothing
happened to him. Irving tried to visit
Canada to give lectures and Jewish groups
there had him arrested and deported. he
argument was that he should be arrested
so as to prevent him from committing a
crime. he crime – violating hate speech
laws by expressing doubts about gas
chambers. Jewish groups have also had
him harassed in Australia and in South
Africa he is one of the few British citizens
required to ask permission before he can
enter the country. If he does come in he
is not allowed to be interviewed by any
media person, give any lectures or express
his opinions publicly.
he same type of laws now exist in
Switzerland and France. In France
various individuals have been arrested
and severely ined for expressing their
doubts about the Holocaust. All of this is
done in the name of banning hate speech.
Yet, very little which is said by these
“holocaust revisionists” seems hateful.
Most do not express anti-Jewish opinions
per se nor do they advocate a Nazi system
of government. But Jewish groups don’t
want the Holocaust questioned, claiming
that any such revisionism is hate speech
and should be banned. Even a balanced
article would be considered unacceptable
since Jewish groups argue that the views
of revisionists shouldn’t be presented at
all.
In the early 60s individuals who said that
Dachau wasn’t a death camp were verbally
attacked and accused of being Nazis. Today
the Simon Wiesenthal Centre publicly
says no gas chamber was used at Dachau.
A book published by the Beate Klarsfeld
Foundation, a Jewish/Holocaust group,
said that anyone attempting to lower
the number of Jewish deaths in German
camps was a Nazi and presumably guilty
of hate. Yet, the Klarsfeld’s themselves,
in the same book, said that new studies
have revealed that far fewer French Jews
had been deported and died than was
previously believed.
When the Klarsfelds say this, it is scholarly
research. If you were to say it, it would be
hate speech.
Hate speech is applied only to certain
protected groups usually speciically
named in the legislation. Whites are
rarely, if ever, protected. Heterosexuals
are not protected. Men are not protected.
If you happen to be white, heterosexual
and male then you better watch out. he
groups which are protected are also oten
the ones who deine “hate”. hus feminists
argue that porn is hate speech directed at
women. At the same time they completely
ignore pornography for gay men. Would-
be censors argue that hate speech leads
to hate crimes and therefore should be
banned. hey also believe that porn leads
to rape and the same logic applies.
Hate speech is
applied only to
certain protected
groups usually
speciically named in the
legislation. Whites are rarely, if
ever, protected. Heterosexuals
are not protected. Men are not
protected. If you happen to be
white, heterosexual and male
then you better watch out.
But is speech the same thing as action?
Very few rational people would say so.
Most governments ban treason, mainly to
protect their own interests. But is criticism
of politicians “treasonous”? Yes, if speech
is the same thing as action. If speech leads
to action then where do we draw the line?
Do we arrest out-spoken atheists because
we assume that atheism leads to arson
attacks on churches?
Take for instance a group of youths who
viewed a ilm about racial intolerance
and then went out and beat a young boy
causing brain damage. Would this ilm
qualify as hate speech since it inspired
them to engage in a violent act based
on race? Probably not, because the ilm
in question was Mississippi Burning a
ilm which is clearly antiracist, meaning
against racism against blacks. But a group
24
of black youths chased down a 14-year-
old white boy named Gregory Riddick
and almost killed him. Ater watching the
movie one of the attackers, Todd Mitchell,
asked his friends, “Do you feel all hyped
up to move on some white people?" When
Riddick walked by Mitchell said, “here
goes a white boy. Go get him.”
here is no doubt that the ilm inspired
something in this gang of criminal racists.
he ilm, which was highly ictionalised,
was described by the New York Times, as
one that “literally crackles with racial hate.”
he director of the ilm said he wanted it
to cause viewers “to react to it viscerally,
emotionally, because of the racism that’s
around them now,” he director got his
wish and Gregory Riddick sufered the
consequences. In spite of the fact that
there was a clear cut connection between
the ilm and the racially motivated attack
on a young man that let him brain
damaged, this would not be considered
hate speech because the racists in question
are members of a protected group. he
victim is not protected. he ilm, even
though it inspired a racial, hate attack is
not hate speech because it is “politically
correct” and therefore it is acceptable to
those who deine hate speech.
Hate speech laws do not promote social
unity and understanding. Instead they
create artiicial conlicts between protected
groups and non-protected groups. he
churches can preach all they want about
how evil pornographers are because
pornographers are not a protected class.
But if a magazine like Hustler were to run
an article questioning the rationality of
religion or pointing out some particular
religious absurdity or hypocrisy this could
easily be deined as “hate speech” and, in
South Africa, be banned.
In practice those groups which are not
politically correct tend to be the targets of
"hate speech" restrictions. A student at the
University of Florida publicly read, before
the Student Government Association,
what he claimed was the manifesto of
the White Students Union which he
represented. He was shouted down by
angry audience participants and called a
racist. His hate speech, in fact, was a word
for word reading of a oicial document
of the Black Student Union. He only
substituted the word “white” where the
document said “black”. But this document
was only branded as “hate speech” when
it was read by a white student. It was just
ine when it was published by blacks.

he main issue
becomes not
what is said
but who says it
and who doesn’t like it.
Opponents of censorship are oten accused
of supporting hate crimes, when in fact
most are simply supporting free speech.
he Let always pulls out images of Hitler’s
Germany and the violation of human
rights that took place there. hey never
seem to use the excesses of Stalin or Mao,
even though both of them committed far
greater atrocities. Perhaps this is because
they are more sympathetic to the political
agenda of these two tyrants.
But in pointing out the human rights
abuses of Nazi Germany the pro-
censorship groups ignore something
important. he atrocities committed by the
Nazis did not come into existence simply
because Hitler preached racial hatred. Nor
was Hitler’s appeal simply the result of his
racism. Other ideas laid the foundation
on which racism was built. And those
same principles were used in South Africa
by the architects of apartheid.
In the end, “hate speech” legislation doesn’t
ban the ideas which are fundamentally
crucial in laying the foundation for the
destruction of individual rights. In many
ways the legislation itself promotes those
ideas. And Nazi Germany is a good case
in point.
Before blatant hate theories can have
popular support several concepts must be
destroyed. Individual rights must be seen
as a myth and replaced with concepts of
“social” rights or collective rights. he State
must be heavily centralised with massive
powers to control every facet of human
existence. he concept of rationality has
to be undermined, if not obliterated.
Private property, while perhaps allowed,
must not be considered sacred and should
be coniscated if the State decides it wants
it. Individual rights must be limited and
never seen as “absolute.” his is what
happened in Germany prior to the rise
of Naziism. Before a country falls into
tyranny it must irst be intellectually and
philosophically undermined.
Hitler was able to implement his
programme only ater others paved the
way for him. His crude appeals to the
masses succeeded only because they
were made intellectually acceptable by
non-Nazi academics – most of them on
the political Let. Hitler told the German
people:
“It is thus necessary that the individual
should inally come to realise that his own
ego is of no importance in comparison
with the existence of his nation: that
the position of the individual ego is
conditioned solely by the interests of the
nation as a whole...that above all, the unity
of a nation’s spirit and will are worth far
more than the freedom of the spirit and
will of an individual.... his state of mind,
which subordinates the interests of the
ego to the conservation of the community,
is really the irst premise of every truly
human culture...he basic attitude from
which such activity arises we call – to
distinguish it from egoism and selishness
– “idealism”. By this we understand only
the individual’s capacity to make sacriices
for the community, for his fellow men.”
At the time he made them, Hitler’s
attacks on individual rights had ceased
being “controversial”. Virtually the entire
intellectual elite of Germany had already
taken the same political view.
he Attack on Reason
Of all the above views the most destructive
is the attack on the supremacy of reason.
If human rationality can be undermined
– if people can no longer believe in their
own reason – then they will seek some
authority to make decisions on their
behalf. In Germany this was the “Fuhrer
principle”. When the individual rational
mind is rendered impotent and authority
replaces thinking then State power
become almost unlimited. Individuals
then stop questioning, stop thinking
and begin obeying. When atrocities are
committed they answer, “Who am I to
question? I was only obeying orders.”
he atrocities are, in fact, the result of
this attitude. he increased power of
political authority leads to a power mad
dictatorship which stamps out individual
rights, private property, free speech, and
economic liberty. When the orders are
given to annihilate, destroy, torture, rape
or steal, the obedient obey. hey do not
question because they no longer believe
their minds capable of rational thought.
More importantly they no longer believe
in rationality.
With Hitler they said, “We are now at the
end of the Age of Reason.” his increase in
State power and destruction of individual
25
thought is the root of virtually all political
atrocities and human rights abuses in
the history of the world. But crude racist
slogans come into play only very late in the
game. By the time such slogans are widely
believed and accepted, it’s already too late.
he foundation for human rights abuses,
by then, is already in place. Without that
foundation the slogans are impotent and
inefective.
Barely two years ater the horrors of
the Second World War a courageous
Englishman named Victor Gollancz wrote
a little book called Our hreatened Values.
Gollancz was England’s most well-known
publisher, a man of the Let, and a Jew. He
was afraid that anti-fascism in England
and the desire for revenge was turning the
anti-fascist movement into little Hitlers.
He asked his fellow socialists and Jews to
investigate the nature of fascism.
He wrote:
“If you tell these people that freedom of
speech means freedom of speech, and not
freedom to say only what the majority
consider wise or decent or expedient or
moral to say, they parry with you with
a reply which, I notice, was recently
employed by Stalin himself in a slightly
diferent form and in another connection.
‘Free speech,’ they say, ‘must not be used
for the purpose of suppressing free speech.’
hey mean that if fascists are allowed to
express their opinions you will get fascism
and what about freedom then? ...But there
is only one objection that matters, and it
is this: that if you silence fascists for fear
that fascism will be established, you have
already half established it by the very
fact of silencing them. ...Fascism is not
some separate and isolated phenomenon,
which can magically be brought into
existence by appealing to people’s reason
or playing on their prejudices: it is the
logical development of certain traits that
are in the human nature of us all. If you
strengthen these traits you make fascism
more probable: if you strengthen the
opposing ones you make it less so. he
strongest of all the anti-fascists traits is
the passion for spiritual and intellectual
freedom; and by so much as you restrict
its play, by so much as you nourish instead
the sado-masochistic elements in our
nature, by so much as you introduce the
irst thin wedge of authoritarianism, by
just so much do you bring a little nearer
the very peril you are anxious to avoid.”
his essay was originally published in South
Africa. Jim Peron is the Executive Director
of the Institute for Liberal Values.
 N E W WO R L D O R D E R
The many
“smoking guns”
that show Bush and
Cheney ordered 9/11
Jonathan Eisen
he other day I watched a video of
George Bush warning people not to
believe “conspiracy theorists” with regard
to what really happened on 9/11.
However, while Mr Bush would have you
uncritically believe the “oicial version”
of 9/11, the real conspiracy theory turns
out to be that same “oicial version”
– namely that 19 Arab hijackers did it
under the direction of arch-villain (and
CIA “asset”) Osama bin Laden.
If you believe this conspiracy theory you
will have to believe that Mr bin Laden
must have (!) issued the “stand down”
orders to the US Air Force that ensured
that no jet ighters were able to take to
the sky to intercept any of the hijacked
aircrat. (hat this “stand down” order
did in fact occur is a matter of public
record, though it was ignored by the
9/11 Commission -– ostensibly set up
to investigate the entire matter of what
happened on that fateful day.)
he stand down order was maintained
for about an hour – ater it was known
that there were four aircrat that had been
hijacked. While Andrews Air Force Base
is only 10 minutes from Washington DC
– and has ighters on stand-by alert 24/7
to intercept any aircrat that deviates
from its announced light path – no
jets from there were scrambled. Lest we
think that this kind of thing is unusual,
interceptions of commercial and private
aircrat that strayed from course actually
happened in the US 61 times for the year
2001 alone from various bases.
Yet Andrews jets which were standing by,
fuelled up and ready, were not launched
to protect Washington.
When some ighters were at last
scrambled from more distant air
ields and sent ater the 9/11 wayward
airplanes, they lew toward the hijacked
planes at only about 550-600 mph, or
only about 1/3 of the speed of which they
are capable.
If you still believe the conspiracy
theory that the “Arabs” were the 9/11
perpetrators, you will now also have to
believe that these same devious Arabs
were able to hack into US military
computers and other communications
channels.
Simultaneous “simulated
hijackings” were being held
on 9/11
However, as well shall see, there were at
least 5 other “simulated hijackings” (a
“military exercise”) taking place at the
same time as the “real” hijackings” were
unfolding. Apparently these same 19
sneaky “Arabs”, hell-bent on attacking
America because they “hated America’s
freedom” (as Mr Bush has stated on many
occasions), arranged for that military
exercise as well.
26
he best “conspiracy theory”
of them all!
hat’s the one that would have you
believe that the passport of Muhammad
Atta, the alleged leader of these same
hijackers, luttered down from the
exploding and collapsing WTC buildings
only to be found MIRACULOUSLY
UNSCATHED (by an FBI agent no less!)
a few blocks from the rubble. And yet
that is the “conspiracy theory” that has
been bought by and disseminated to the
world by mainstream media.
It is “conspiracy theory” gone completely
mad for the US government to claim
to have “identiied” these same Arab
hijackers only a day or two ater
September 11 – complete with photos of
each and every one of them – while at
the same time pleading (as Bush, Rice,
Cheney and Rumsfeld did) that they had
“no idea” and “no warning” that this was
going to happen, and that it came as a
complete surprise.
It is also pure “conspiracy theory” to
continue to maintain the Arab hijacker
“explanation” ater at least 8 of them
identiied themselves a few days later,
alive and well, thank you very much,
and living in various other countries.
Some reported that their passports had
been stolen, but this, too, was never
investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
Nor did the FBI ever retract or even
bother to alter its list of the perpetrators.
“Smoking gun” #1:
no passenger plane wreckage was ever found at the
Pentagon crash site.
Who do you believe: Your
own eyes – or George Bush?
Where is the plane?
However, while the list goes on and on,
the real gateway proof that the Bush
Administration people ordered the events
of 9/11 is in the fact that no passenger
757 (or any other jetliner) ever hit the
Pentagon.
Take a deep breath on this one, because
the implications of this one salient fact
are, simply, enormous.
Everything else that Bush and his people
have said to “justify” the war on Iraq
has been a lie, exposed most recently by
the “smoking gun memo” revealed to
the world by the London Times. In this
memo (actually the minutes of a high-
level government meeting in the UK),
the decision is made to “cook the books”
on the intelligence received from Iraq in
order to make the case more plausible for
war.
However, while just about everything
Bush and his people have said about 9/11
has been unravelling for years, thanks
in part to a brigade of independent
researchers (www.indtheboeing.com,
www.pentalawn2000, www.911physics.
net, among others) and supported by
sites like www.rense.com, nothing quite
stands out more than the Big Lie about
the crash at the Pentagon.
he more you study the evidence, the
more this whopper stands out head
and shoulders from the rest, and totally
“Smoking gun”#2
owner Silverstein admitted that WTC building 7 that
no plane hit (shown collapsing below) was deliberately
“pulled”. In other words it was intentionally demolished.
implicates the Bush administration as the
“perp”.
Indeed, have a careful look for yourself
and make up your own mind. hen ask
yourself whether or not you believe
your own eyes, or believe what the Bush
administration has been telling you
– the same administration that has lied
consistently about 9/11, Iraq, and the
“war on terror”.
he fact of the matter is that the initial
impact of whatever hit the Pentagon
made a hole far, far too small for a
passenger jet to it into. What is more, it
only took out THE FIRST FLOOR of the
building. (he rest of the loors collapsed
about an hour later.)
Add to this is the fact that no wreckage
of 757 engines, wings, fuselage, tail, black
boxes, seats, bodies, etc) were ever found
– and you’ve got a smoking gun. Study
the pictures. Take a good, hard look. No
wreckage.
But wait. If this is true,
then what happened to
the real Flight #77? hat
question is a good place
to start.
27
FACT:
No passenger plane
wreckage was ever found at
the Pentagon “crash site”.
a professional pilot’s analysis:
the engines (2) would have penetrated deeper into the wall and
I lew the Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet, but not this 757. I retired before framing structure further than any other part making a deinite
this came into service. But, from what I see (or don't see) looking hole. he belly of the aircrat contains fuel tanks, baggage, mail
at these pictures; it’s hard to pick out aircrat parts. he wingtips bags, and cargo; none of this type debris can be seen.
alone would have sheared of and bounced back into the street,
Assuming 8600 gallons of kerosene fuel at
a speciic gravity of approximately 6.9 lbs/
gal (temperature considered) weight of the
fuel would be close to 60,000 lbs and would
splatter everywhere. Where are the seats,
those with passengers buckled in would be
ripped out of the loor. For that matter, where
are the passengers? I have never seen an
aircrat accident where the aircrat evaporated
upon impact, water, land or buildings. If
these pictures were taken within 3 days ater
9/11, there would have been deinite remains
of parts. I don't see any.

– From American Patriot Friends Network

APFN@apfn.org

notice that only the irst

loor was impacted.

• How were bodies

from the Boeing 757
identiied, while at
the same time 60 tons
of metal supposedly
vaporised?
hese two photographs show the building
just ater the attack. We may observe that the
aircrat only hit the ground loor. he four upper
loors collapsed only towards 10.10 am. he
building is 26 metres high. Can you explain
how a Boeing approximately 15 metres high,
52 metres long, with a wingspan of 42 metres
and a cockpit 4 metres high, could crash into
just the ground loor of this building?

28
When asked by a journalist:
"Is there anything left of the aircraft at
all?" the Fire Chief said “We don’t know”.

"First of all, the question about words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of
the aircrat, there are some small thing.
pieces of aircrat visible from the
interior during this ire-ighting You know, I'd rather not comment on that. We have a
operation I'm talking about, lot of eyewitnesses that can give you better information
but not large sections. In other about what actually happened with the aircrat as it
– Arlington County Fire Chief, Ed Plaugher, at a press conference held by Assistant
Defence Secretary, Victoria Clarke, on 12 September 2001, at the Pentagon.

“he damning images of lames raging inside the Pentagon behind an unbroken wall with
many unbroken windows and an unbroken roof line clearly demonstrates that whatever
caused the explosion and ire inside America's most secure building, coupled with no
signiicant trace of airplane wreckage at any time during the disaster, was no giant airliner.”
– John Kaminsky, www.rense.com

hese photographs show representations of a Boeing 757-200 superimposed on the section

of the building that was hit. Can you explain what
happened to the wings of the aircrat and why they
caused no damage?

29
 How did a 757 (essentially a hollow tube)
pierce six reinforced walls of the Pentagon
fortress? No source I have read has
convincingly explained how this could have
EnTRY happened. Incidentally, the inal hole, of
which there is fortunately a photograph,
is remarkably well-deined, and about 2.3
metres in diameter.

EXIT

For more information see: www.findtheboeing.com and pentalawn2000.com

he facade and walls did not collapse for an hour ater the attack. he lawn is virtually pristine.
Remember that this is supposed to be the scene of a passenger airline crash.

30
 In 1997 a small group in the uS called
for a “new Pearl Harbor” which would
be used to justify a war on Iraq and
afghanistan. This group now runs the
bush administration.
Warhawks drafted
blueprint for bloody u.S.
World domination
he cabal of war fanatics advising
the White House secretly planned a
“transformation” of defence policy years
ago, calling for war against Iraq and
huge increases in military spending.
A “catalysing event – like a new Pearl
Harbor” – was seen as necessary to bring
this about.
he huge increases in U.S. military
spending that have occurred since the
terror attacks of September 11, 2001,
were planned before President George
W. Bush was elected by the same men
who are pushing the administration’s
“war on terrorism” and the invasion and
occupation of Iraq.
A neo-conservative Washington-based
organisation known as the Project for the
New American Century (PNAC), funded
by three foundations closely tied to
Persian Gulf oil and weapons industries,
drated the war plan for U.S. global
domination through military power.
One of the organisation’s documents
clearly shows that Bush and his most
senior cabinet members had already
planned an attack on Iraq before he took
power in January 2001. (Conirmed by
the “Downing St Memos”– Ed.)
he PNAC was founded in the spring
of 1997 by the well-known Zionist neo-
conservatives Robert Kagan and William
Kristol of he Weekly Standard. he
PNAC is part of the New Citizenship
Project, whose chairman is also William
Kristol, and is described as “a non-proit,
educational organisation whose goal is to
promote American global leadership.”
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb
Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz signed a unresolved conlict with Iraq provides
Statement of Principles of the PNAC the immediate justiication, the need for
on June 3, 1997, along with many of a substantial American force presence
the other current members of Bush’s in the Gulf transcends the issue of the
“war cabinet.” Wolfowitz was one of regime of Saddam Hussein.” “Even
the directors of PNAC until he joined should Saddam pass from the scene,”
the Bush administration. he group’s the plan says U.S. military bases in Saudi
essential demand was for hety increases Arabia and Kuwait will remain, despite
in defence spending. “We need to domestic opposition in the Gulf states to
increase defence spending signiicantly the permanent stationing of U.S. troops.
if we are to carry out our global Iran, it says, “may well prove as large a
responsibilities today and modernise threat to U.S. interests as Iraq has.”
our armed forces for the future,” the
statement’s irst principle reads. A “core mission” for the transformed
U.S. military is to “ight and decisively
he increase in defence spending is to win multiple, simultaneous major
bring about two of the other principles: theatre wars,” according to the PNAC.
“to challenge regimes hostile to our he strategic “transformation” of the
interests and values” and “to accept U.S. military into an imperialistic force
responsibility for America’s unique of global domination would require a
role in preserving and extending an huge increase in defence spending to
international order friendly to our “a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent
security, our prosperity, and our of gross domestic product, adding $15
principles.” billion to $20 billion to total defence
spending annually,” the PNAC plan said.
A subsequent PNAC plan entitled “he process of transformation,” the plan
“Rebuilding America’s Defences: said, “is likely to be a long one, absent
Strategies, Forces and Resources for a some catastrophic and catalysing event
New Century,” reveals that the current – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
members of Bush’s cabinet had already
planned, before the
2000 presidential
election, to take
military control
of the Gulf region
whether Saddam
Hussein is in power
or not.
he 90-page PNAC
document from
September 2000
says: “he United
States has for
decades sought
to play a more
permanent role
in Gulf regional
security. While the
31
American Free Press asked Christopher
Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC
about what was meant by the need for “a
new Pearl Harbor.”
“hey needed more money to up the
defence budget for raises, new arms, and
future capabilities,” Maletz said. “Without
some disaster or catastrophic event”
neither the politicians nor the military
would have approved, Maletz said.
he “new Pearl Harbor,” in the form of
the terror attacks of Sept. 11, provided
the necessary catalyst to put the global
war plan into efect. Congress quickly
allocated $40 billion to fund the “war on
terrorism” shortly ater 9-11.
A Pentagon spokesman told AFP that
$17.5 billion of that initial allocation
went to defence.
REVIEW
9/11: The Road
To Tyranny –
a Film by alex Jones
By Clare Swinney
Alex Jones publicly predicted the 9/11
attack on air in July 2001 – weeks before
it happened.
Privy to inside information, Jones, a
Texas-based radio and television host and
the maker of 9/11: he Road to Tyranny,
actually told people on air to call the
White House and Congress and say the
following:
he U.S. defence budget for 2002,
including a $14.5 billion supplement,
came to $345.7 billion, a nearly 12
percent increase over the 2001 defence
budget.
Similar signiicant increases in defence
spending happened in 2003 (to $365
billion) and 2004 (to at least $378 billion)
in line with the PNAC plan.
Veteran journalist John Pilger recently
wrote about one of PNAC’s founding
members, Richard Perle: “I interviewed
Perle when he was advising Reagan,
and when he spoke about ‘total war,’ I
mistakenly dismissed him as mad,” Pilger
wrote. “He recently used the term again
in describing America’s ‘war on terror.’
‘No stages,’ he said. ‘his is total war.
We are ighting a variety of enemies.
here are lots of them out there. All
"We know you're up to something, and
if any terrorist attacks occur in the US, if
any planes crash into any buildings, like
the World Trade Centre - we'll know you
were behind it!"
If you don’t believe that the US
government has the guile and
wherewithal to fake the war on
terrorism and commit mass murder
on US soil, Jones will change your
mind. A prodigious researcher with
a grim determination to expose the
“bloodthirsty evil tyrants” before they
strike again, Jones made this ilm with an
extreme sense of urgency.
he ilm is political dynamite.
As well as torpedoing the US
Government’s version of events, it
provides a cogent framework to help
understand why the attacks occurred. It
also places the tragedies in a historical
context and gives you a taste of what
motivated the attacks.
hus, it is far meatier than Michael
Moore’s popular Fahrenheit 9/11, because
while Moore (who allegedly plagiarised
Jones’ work), only goes as far as to
suggest the US government allowed 9/11
to occur, Jones shows that they instigated
the attacks in order to usher in a fascist
agenda.
32
this talk about irst we are going to do
Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq . . . this
is entirely the wrong way to go about it.
If we just let our vision of the world go
forth, and we embrace it entirely and
we don’t try to piece together clever
diplomacy, but just wage a total war . . .
our children will sing great songs about
us years from now.’ ”
“his is a blueprint for U.S. world
domination – a new world order of
their making,” Tam Dalyell, British
parliamentarian and critic of the war
policy from the Labour Party said. “hese
are the thought processes of fantasist
Americans who want to control the
world. “his is garbage from think-tanks
stufed with chicken-hawks,” Dalyell said,
“men who have never seen the horror of
war but are in love with the idea of war.”
Surprised? Numerous unscrupulous
governments have manufactured crises
(such as terrorist events) for generations
– and the Americans are no exception.
Witness the Gulf of Tonkin "incident" in
which Lyndon Johnson lied to the world
about the North Vietnamese "attacking"
US warships. It brought the US into the
war full-scale.
Johnson was lying. he North
Vietnamese attack never happened.
Witness the fact that FDR knew about
the pending Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor and let it happen. 3000 people
died there.
Witness the 1898 start to the Spanish
American War in which the US blew up
one of its own battleships (he Maine)
and blamed it on the Spanish, whose
colonies (Cuba and he Philippeans) the
Americans coveted.
Witness the Nazis' burning of the
Reichstag (their parliament) and then
blaming it on the Communists, in order
to consolidate their power.
Jones tellingly cites the little-known
Pentagon "Operation Northwoods"
document as part of this pattern. he
plan was prepared by the Joint Chiefs
of Staf in 1962 and signed by its chair,
Lyman Lemnitzer.
9/11: he Road to Tyranny reveals that
US military leaders proposed to commit
terrorist acts against Americans and
blame them on Cubans, to create a
pretext for invasion and the ousting of
Communist leader, Fidel Castro.
Foreshadowing the events of 9/11,
Operation Northwoods called for the
hijacking of civilian jet airliners, the
attacking of US military bases, blowing
up of US ships and the shooting of
civilians using paramilitary sniper teams.
President Kennedy rejected the plot on
moral grounds, and Jones says that this
played a hand in his assassination
While the Northwoods proposal exposed
the fact that Nazi-style agendas were
being given serious consideration within
the upper echelons of the American
government, it wasn’t until February
26, 1993, that these agendas were given
"legs" in a plot that was apparently
masterminded by the FBI: A 1,200-
pound bomb in a van exploded in the
parking garage beneath the World Trade
Center – the most destructive attack
carried out on US soil up to that time,
killing 6 people and injuring more than a
thousand.
If the van had been parked closer to one
of the pillars, which was the FBI’s plan,
it may well have led to the collapse of a
tower, and killed tens of thousands.
Jones leaves no doubt about who
perpetrated the atrocity. Former Egyptian
military oicer and FBI informant, Emad
Salem was ofered US$1,000,000 by the
FBI to commit the crime.
Salem wisely had taken the precaution
of taping his conversations with the FBI,
wherein they admitted to being behind
the bombing.
Jones worked for over 6 years collecting
evidence on the April 19, 1995, bombing
of the Alfred P Murrah building in
downtown Oklahoma, which killed 169
people. His documentary leaves no
doubt that the US government’s story
about the explosives in a Ryder truck
parked outside by lone-nutcase Timothy
McVeigh – is absolute hogwash. he US
government executed the bombing and
Jones supplies their motive to strengthen
the case against them further.
his motive?
he fear that ensued from the bombing
enabled the US government to usher in
the Antiterrorism and Efective Death
Penalty Act of 1996. his law obliterated
parts of the US Constitution and the Bill
of Rights, and helped to pave the way for
the new American fascism.
Jones (and many others now, besides
him) maintains that the attack on the
World Trade Centre on 11 Sept. 2001,
was staged by the US government. It
provided a politically "acceptable" reason
to invade Afghanistan and it aroused
so much fear that most people gladly
sacriiced their freedom for the "security"
promised them by the Bush police state.
his conclusion was evidenced within
a scant 45 days ater 9/11, when the US
government enacted sweeping changes
to its laws, supposedly to counteract
terrorism or terrorist threats, but in reality
to exact more power and control over the
people. he legislation named “Uniting
and Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,”
(known widely as the USA PATRIOT
Act), was passed and signed into law by
Mr Bush on October 26, 2001. Although
this Act is one of the most far-reaching in
modern American history in its potential
negative impact on civil liberties, the US
Congress wasn’t even permitted to read it
before signing it.
But sign it they did, stampeded as they
(mostly) were into submission. (here
were some notable exceptions, one
of whom being the popular Sen Paul
Wellstone who was later tragically killed
in a suspicious airplane "accident".)
Further evidence of the fast-track to
tyranny, is the US Kangaroo Court
system and Nazi-style prisons at
Guantanamo Bay, Iraq and Afghanistan.
he US government has asserted its
"right" to try detainees in secret, to
torture, to keep any evidence secret, to
refuse any possibility of appeal, and to
execute.
here are currently tens of thousands
of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan and
elsewhere, most of whom are being
incarcerated without any charges having
been brought against them.
Jones shows exactly how the “global elite”
has been pushing for many years – some
say for many generations – for their "New
World Order". Many United Nations
treaties and declarations, as well as
documents and quotes from prominent
world leaders paint a very clear picture
of the progressive plan for global
33
governance. One world government – in.
National sovereignty – out.
He shows how peoples’ rights have been
seriously eroded at street level. “We all
thought it couldn’t happen here. It was
only Russia or Nazi Germany,” Jones
says. But in the US "Operation TIPPs",
children are being indoctrinated Soviet-
style by being ofered up to US$200 to
snitch on family and friends who act or
think "suspiciously". he US Military
is literally inundating the American
public with psychological warfare on
a truly grand scale and the media are
increasingly iniltrated and controlled.
Microchip implants, touted as a means
of identiication, and another "security
technology", are being pushed on
the people. Surveillance technology
is ubiquitous. And most scary of all,
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) camps have been established
around the US, to corral people, such as
"protesters" and "dissident", into huge
concentration camp-like facilities.
Is Jones simply paranoid, another
"conspiracy theorist". Watch this ilm
and judge for yourself.
“More terror attacks are coming and it’s
up to you to get the word out of who’s
behind them, because by doing that,
we’re able to shine the spotlight on these
creatures and show how they’re using it
to get more power and control and then
they lose the power they have over us…”
he says.
he New Zealand
Connection
While 9/11: he Road to Tyranny is
primarily about lethal power plays on US
soil, it also bears remembering that our
government, like many others, was drawn
into the ‘war on terrorism’ on a pretext,
a sham. In fact the NZ government
went so far as to resolve to give “total
support for the approach taken by the
United States of America in response to
the terrorist attacks in New York on 11
September.”
hese weren’t empty words. New
Zealand provided aircrat, SAS troops
and air force personnel, as well as
military intelligence staf for the illegal
invasion of Afghanistan in 2001-2002.
And although we were led to believe this
was to root out the Taliban, it resulted
in the death of thousands of innocent
Afghans, many of whom starved, while
The sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbour in 1898 was the first known instance of US “terrorism” inflicted on its own people.

the US proceeded to drop bombs on 9/11: he Road To Tyranny is sold at

cities and villages well ater they’d infowars.com. In NZ video copies can be
declared the Taliban forces destroyed. purchased for $18.50, which includes the
postage, from: 9/11 he Video, Box 501,
New Zealanders, among others, were Waikanae.
conned (or bullied) into supporting
state terrorism and the most brutal and Inquiries to: 9/11Video@xtra.co.nz.
dangerous crimes against humanity. Jones’ ilms are not copyrighted and he
encourages people to make copies of
Jones’ work raises serious questions them to circulate.
regarding the claim made by the Security
Intelligence Service's (SIS) that there are
active supporters of terrorism in New
Zealand. As Keith Locke, Green Party
Security and Intelligence Spokesperson
points out, it’s probable that SIS claims
that terrorists are in New Zealand have
been made simply in order to justify their
own existence, and the greater danger is
that they are damaging race relations by
unfairly casting aspersions on Muslim
migrants.

he SIS declined to comment to this

reporter on these allegations.

Whether you like it or not, this ilm will

take you to the twilight zone between
nightmare and reality. While Jones’
grim vision for the future may seem
like something from Star Trek, it is
suiciently well supported by evidence.
You will be let with chilling expectations 1898 SINKING OF THE “MAINE”. For years the Cubans, strongly supported by the American public, had
you wish you could deny, but ind you been in rebellion against the Spanish colonial government. On 15 February, 1898, the US cruiser “Maine”
can not. was sunk by an explosion in Havana harbour. he cause of the explosion remains a mystery, and it is most
unlikely that Spain would have committed so suicidal an act of provocation. America, however, seized on the
pretext for war, and with vastly superior forces, vastly overwhelmed the Spaniards in a brief campaign. he
illustrations show two views of the wreckage during a lengthy period when it was being examined by experts.

34
 The fatal law in
the 9/11 coverup:
By John Kaminski
Why can no one name the
hijackers or prove they
lew the planes?
In order for the people of the world to
be convinced that Islamic hijackers were
responsible for terrible tragedy of 9/11,
we need to see some evidence – not
hearsay, innuendo, aspersion or promises
of evidence, but real evidence.
Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly
regarded as a ruse, a set up to conceal
the identities of the real culprits, the
ones who sit smugly in front of the TV
cameras and plot their cynical war on
terror – otherwise known as the war on
the people of the world.
President Bush continues to insist that
his word be accepted as truth, time ater
time his statements have been revealed
as blatant falsehoods. Yet he continues
to repeat them, and the corporate media
continues to accept them.
Why hasn't either the Bush adminis-
tration or some element of law enforce-
ment in the United States issued a single
solid piece of evidence connecting the
hijackers to the hijacked airplanes? Why
don’t the alleged hijackers appear on the
airport security videos? Why aren’t there
any credit card records of their ticket
purchases?
Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say
very publicly to the Commonwealth Club
of San Francisco that nothing on paper
connected Arab terrorists to 9/11?
I mean, two and half years have passed.
And the feds produced 19 names
within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice
a mathematical inconsistency here?
All that has happened since is mere
vigilante hysteria, hypothetical scenarios
trumpeted ad nauseum by America’s
notoriously brainwashed press.
Seven or eight of the names on that
original list have been found living
comfortably in other countries. Why
hasn’t the FBI made any attempt to
correct the errors made on that original
list? See for yourself.
http://members.fortunecity.com/911/
september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm
and http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
And why, ater much hullabaloo about
Colin Powell using phony information in
his remarks to the United Nations about
the reasons for the war on Iraq, hasn’t
the U.S. government produced a single
conclusive piece of evidence to back up
its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama
bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists?
Not a single piece!
here's a simple answer to this: here
isn't any evidence. And why is that?
Because those pseudo-Muslims revealed
35
to be so incompetent at piloting jerkwater
training planes had absolutely zero
chance of lying sophisticated jetliners
into anything narrower than the
Grand Canyon, never mind executing
tricky maneuvers with extraordinarily
complicated machinery.
he unknown men who played the
roles of the so-called Arab terrorist
hijackers were really recruited by either
American and/or Israeli intelligence
services in a scheme set up as a diversion
to inlame dumb Westerners against
the Islamic world. he purpose was to
divert the world’s attention from the
Israeli genocide and dispossession of the
Palestinians by blaming the attacks on
Muslims.
But that was only half the objective. he
other half was to enable our despicable
cabal of neocons to leece the American
public with an endless array of no-bid
contracts to enrich the conscienceless
billionaires who are really driving the war
machine.
You know how the Bushista American
government uses anything for PR to
supposedly authenticate its own evil
agenda. If they had any concrete evidence
against the hijackers — if they even
possessed their correct names — we
would have heard about it by now. here
would be an avalanche of TV shows
about them.
Ater two and half years, with the whole
world knowing that eight of the 19 names
on the hijacker list are fraudulent, the
FBI has made no attempt to substitute
new names. And why is that? Because
the identities of the hijackers were
constructed with mostly stolen papers,
for some of the patsies designed to take
the heat. In any case, and whoever they
were, there is no evidence they ever got
on the planes.
Instead we have one minor player whose
conviction in Germany, was overturned,
partly because Americans refused to help
with the prosecution.
We have the so-called 20th hijacker and
assorted other preposterous character
actors languishing in jails on trumped-up
charges. We have security camera ilm
at the Pentagon, which surely reveals
that no jetliner hit that building, locked
away in Ashcrot's vault under the phony
aegis of national security. We have all
the rubble of the World Trade Center,
which surely would have revealed the use
of nuclear explosives creating shattered
beams in odd places, instantly carted
away with no forensic investigation. We
have transcripts – but no recordings – of
these phony cellphone calls, some from
people who may not have even existed.
And we have the famous stand down in
which America's air defences suddenly
evaporated – the only time in US history
this has happened.
hen there is Marvin Bush sitting
suspiciously on the board of directors
of the security company that had the
he 9/11 US Air Force
"Stand down"
Scrambling Fighter Jets
Standard operating procedure of both
FAA & NORAD dictates that once
an aircrat is of course and/or its
transponder is not responding, within
10 minutes Air Force jets are scrambled
to re-establish physical contact with the
wayward plane.
Scrambling Air Force interceptors does
not mean shooting down any aircrat.
It simply means that an Air Force jet is
dispatched to ly next to the of course
aircrat, attempt to communicate with
its pilots, look inside the cockpit, see
contract for the Twin Towers.
And Larry Silverstein, who conveniently
leased and insured the towers shortly
before the big hits, telling oicials to
"pull" a relatively intact tower, which then
fell identically to the two structures that
were struck by the two airplanes, creating
the impression that that's the way all
three came down.
Billions of dollars of windfall proits
were made by savvy investors in the days
before 9/11, and an FBI investigation
insists nothing was amiss with these
spectacular deals. Of course, we don't
get the details. Only "assurances"
that the trades were not suspicious,
despite patterns and results that were
unprecedented in the entire history of
inancial trading.
We have reports from iremen of
explosions at the base of the Twin Towers
BEFORE they fell, and the seismographic
evidence to back up these assertions.
We have US leaders telling us that they
didn't know such a thing could happen,
when the government had been studying
the problem for ten years. In fact, it had
held at least two major drills simulating
such a possibility.
Perhaps most tellingly of all, is the tragic
tale of John O’Neill, a rabidly honest
FBI investigator, who was prevented
from following his leads about Osama
bin Laden because of the danger he
would have discovered the links from
Afghanistan back to CIA headquarters.
Just review the way he was prevented
who is in control of the plane and
report back to light control what is
actually happening. In the year prior
to 9/11 this automatic procedure
was triggered a total of 67 times (AP,
8/13/02). On the morning of 9/11, it
was not successfully applied even once
in the well over an hour-long period
in which the four separate hijackings
occurred.
Why?
he most egregious case is that of
Flight 77, reported to have struck the
Pentagon. At 8:50 am there was a loss
of contact with this plane that was now
well of course and hurtling toward the
nation’s capital, but it was not until 9:24
am that ighter jets were scrambled.
hat’s 34 minutes ater light control lost
36
from conducting his probe of the Cole
bombing, and prevented by digging into
other leads by the same guys – namely
insiders Louis Freeh and homas Picard
– who prevented signiicant reports from
other FBI agents from seeing the light of
day.
To assert that genuine Arab hijackers did
not carry out the attacks of 9/11 requires
analysis of two concomitant categories:
the history of American (and Israeli)
involvement (and subterfuge) with Arab
terrorists, and the methods of remote
control of aircrat, or other means of
piloting aircrat.
he remote control question continues
to be a bone of contention among
legitimate pilots, with some asserting
that only real pilots could have made
such skilful maneuvers and others
insisting only remote control could have
accomplished such a feat. An interesting
new perspective on this debate can be
found here:
http://joevialls.altermedia.info/wtc/
radiocontrol.html
Finally, many researchers claim the
name al-Qaeda was made up in the
mid 1990s by a variety of American
functionaries (one of them being none
other than Richard Clarke) as an all-
purpose villain the U.S. could blame as
a convenient justiication for its military
adventurism. And recently, a group
of Israeli provocateurs was discovered
trying to create their own faux version of
al-Qaeda.
contact with the plane and well ater 2
allegedly hijacked aircrat had already
crashed into both World Trade Center
towers. Fighter planes were dispatched
extremely late to the World Trade
Center as well, and only made it there
ater Flight 175 had crashed into WTC
2, too late to be efective. hose planes
were then sent back to base, instead
of being sent in pursuit of an aircrat,
which by that time was widely known
to have been well of course. Why?
Did war games conducted by the Air
Force, NORAD, NRO and others
on 9/11 unintentionally cause this
unprecedented ‘confusion’, or does
all of this point to more disturbing
conclusions about what happened that
tragic morning?

How many more hints do you need?
he absence of any relevant arrests or
discovery of any clues to the hierarchy of
this supposedly world-wide terror group
should tell you a lot.
Al-Qaeda doesn’t exist except for when
they want it to, to blame for any sort
of strategic terror they have created
themselves for some political reason, like
inluencing the elections in Spain.
Why haven’t American intelligence
operatives gone to these foreign countries
to interview these named hijackers who
turned out to be alive? Because they
knew the list was iction in the irst
place, and the Arab-types who have been
named as terror gurus are mostly their
own employees, or people who have been
set up by them.
If we knew who the hijackers were, we'd
know their names, wouldn't we? Or is
it now worth bombing other nations
and murdering thousands of innocent
people because we say we know who the
hijackers were, even though we don't
know their names?
John Kaminski,
http://www.johnkaminski.com
eMail: skylax@comcast.net
250 N. McCall Rd. #2,
Englewood FL USA 34223
9/11 links
• Mike Ruppert: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/
• Jared Israel: http://www.tenc.net/
• Eric Hufschmid: http://www.erichufschmid.net/
• Andreas von Buelow: http://www.prisonplanet.com/jones_report.html
• Michael Meacher: http://truthout.org/docs_03/090703A.shtml
• hierry Meyssan: http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/05/23/29196.html
• Dick Eastman: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
• A.K. Dewdney: http://physics911.org/
• Jim Hofman: http://911research.wtc7.net/
• Jef King: http://911review.org/Wiki/King,Jef.shtml
• Rosalee Grable: http://thewebfairy.com/911/
• Bill Manning: http://www.rense.com/general18/ireighter.htm
• Jerry Russell: http://www.911-strike.com/
• Ken Vardon: http://www.apfn.org/
• Peter Meyer: http://www.serendipity.li/
• Paul hompson: http://www.unansweredquestions.org/timeline/
• Mark Elsis: http://www.911timeline.net/
• Carol Valentine: http://www.public-action.com/
• Ralph Omholt: http://home.comcast.net/~skydriter/exp.htm
• Jon Carlson: http://www.rense.com/general54/light93crashwitnesses.htm
• Gerard Holmgren's "he Truth About Sept. 11": http://www. serendipity.li
• Woody Box: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=323
• Michel Chossudovsky: http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html
• Nico Haupt: http://ny911truth.org/articles/stop_coverup.htm
• Michael Kane: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=387
• Barbara Honegger: http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/
channel.cfm?channelid=101&contentid=641
• Scott Forbes: http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/powerdown.html
• Scott Loughrey: http://www.rense.com/general50/amy.htm
• Alex Jones: http://www.prisonplanet.com/
• Col. Donn de Grand Pre: http://www.warfolly.vzz.net/nohijackers.htm
• Phil Jayhan: http://www.letsroll911.org/
• John Judge: http://www.septembereleventh.org/forum/showthreaded.php?
Cat=&Number=742&page=&view=&sb=5&o=&vc=1
• Kyle Hence: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/fake_opposition.htm
• Michael Moore: http://www.counterpunch.org/lodge09172003.html
• Daniel Hopsicker: http://www.madcowprod.com/
• A.K. Dewdney: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm
• Riley/von Kleist: http://www.thepowermall.com/
• Michael Elliott: http://911review.org/
• Jim Hofman: http://911review.com/
• http://rense.com/general65/911m.htm (on WTC7 Collapse)
37
 to the Congress. (Thus, a president –

The USA “Fascism Act”

including the current one – can stonewall
or selectively present information to
Congress). Whistle blower protections
were removed from the bill so that
federal employees cannot report on their
superiors.

Amazingly, it also hides the entire

Americans have lived with the Patriot Act
for more than three years. A few people
have voiced their concerns about the
loss of their Fourth Amendment right to
privacy. For those who want a refresher,
this is the complete amendment, which
went into effect in 1791:
"The right of the people to be secure
in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
Warrants shall issue, but upon probable
cause, supported by Oath or afirmation,
and particularly describing the place to
be searched, and the persons or things to
be seized."
The 400-page Patriot Act (HR 3162)
completely overturns this amendment,
which has been the cornerstone of the
American right to privacy for more than
200 years. The Patriot Act was rushed
through Congress within weeks of 9/11.
It was certainly written before 9/11,
waiting in the wings, so to speak. The
members of Congress rivaled the wisdom
of Homer Simpson who, when once
faced with a Waiver to sue for damages
from the dreaded Mr. Burns And his team
of lawyers, stated courageously, "I’m
not signing anything until I read it or
somebody gives me the gist of it!"
And just what constitutes terrorism, these
days? Your guess is as good as mine.
It gets worse. For now we also live with
the Intelligence Reform Act, passed in
December 2004, an even more mammoth
piece of legislation which continues
the assault on the rights of American
citizens.
For instance, it enables the President to
select top Intelligence positions without
Senate conirmation. As writer Mike
Whitney put it, this is "an invitation to
create his personal security apparatus
without congressional interference." It
also enables the new Intelligence Director
to exempt his ofice from audits and
investigations. It eliminates provisions
to ensure that Congress receives timely
access to intelligence. It allows the
White House’s Ofice of Management
and Budget to screen testimony before
the Intelligence Director presents it
intelligence budget from Congressional
scrutiny.
Finally, as Whitney points out, the
Intelligence Director "shall have
authority to direct or undertake electronic
surveillance and physical search
operations pursuant to FISA if authorised
by statute or executive order." Yes, that’s
executive order.
The U.S. major media was silent on these
issues. In fact, long-time publisher of the
Washington Post, Katherine Graham in
1988 said this: "There are some things the
general public does not need to know and
shouldn’t. I believe democracy lourishes
when the government can take legitimate
steps to keep its secrets and when the
press can decide whether to print what it
knows."

The Patriot Act is bad, very bad. The

carefully worded Section 213, for
example, provides for the Infamous
ability to "sneak and peak." It establishes
the ability to issue secret warrants for any
federal crime – not just terrorism – and
indeed to extend the secrecy indeinitely.
Police can break in, examine and remove
or alter items, and can do this without
ever presenting owners with a warrant
detailing what they were entitled to do.

The Patriot Act also allows authorities

to examine your medical, inancial,
educational and even library records,
whether or not they show any evidence
of a crime. Credit reporting irms must
also disclose to the FBI any information
that agents request in connection with a
terrorist investigation, without the need
for a court order. In the past, this was
he burning of the Reichstag (German parliament) by the Nazis in 1933. Hitler blamed the communists
only permitted in espionage cases.
and brought in the “Enabling Act” which was similar to the US Patriot Act.

38

Why the
oicial version
of 9/11
is a hoax
John Kaminski
Author’s note: his story is intended for
people who have accepted the oicial
version of the 9/11 story. It should be
distributed widely to the uninformed
few who still believe this tragedy was
engineered by Muslim terrorists.
Either by incompetence or by design,
George W. Bush allowed the 9/11 attacks
to happen, and probably was involved
in the planning of them. he American
people might stand by and allow him to
slaughter every nation in the world, but
they will not stand for it when they know
he participated in the mass killing of his
own people.
Opposed by everyone in the world who
was not bought of, the illegal invasion
of Iraq was undertaken for many reasons
– the imminent replacement of the
dollar by the euro as the world’s primary
currency, the tempting lure of untapped
oil reserves, the desire to consolidate
US/Israeli military hegemony over a
strategically vital region – but the most
important reason was to further obscure
questions about the awesome deception
staged by the American government that
has come to be known as 9/11.
9/11 was a hoax. his is no longer a
wild conspiracy assertion; it is a fact,
supported by thousands of other
veriiable facts, foremost of which are:
• he attacks of 9/11 COULD NOT
HAVE HAPPENED without the wilful
failure of the American defence system.
In Washington, US Air Force pilots
demanded to ly but were ordered to
stand down. Yet instead of prosecuting
the president and military leaders for
this unprecedented dereliction of duty,
military leaders were promoted and the
president was praised for presiding over
a defence system that suspiciously failed
the most crucial test in its history.
• Planes that lose contact with control
towers are usually intercepted by ighter
jets inside of ten minutes, as the incident
with the golfer’s plane a few months
earlier so clearly demonstrated. Yet on
9/11, the jetliners that struck New York
were allowed to proceed unmolested for
more than a half-hour ater contact was
lost. he plane that supposedly crashed in
Washington was not intercepted for more
than an hour and forty minutes ater it
was widely known that four planes had
been hijacked.
• he twin towers could not have
collapsed as a result of burning jet fuel.
Most of that fuel was consumed on
impact. In the south tower, most of the
fuel was spilled outside the building. Heat
caused by burning jet fuel does not reach
temperatures needed to melt steel. What
does stand out as particularly suspicious
and still unexplained is that ires raged
out of control beneath THREE of the
collapsed towers for ONE HUNDRED
DAYS, clearly indicating the presence of
some kind of substance utilised in the
demolition of the structures.
• he Twin Towers did not fall because
of plane impacts or ires. Most likely
explosives were placed on structural
supports in the towers (as was done in
Oklahoma City), and these controlled
implosions snufed out the lives of three
thousand people.
• FBI Director Robert Mueller insisted
oicials had no idea this kind of attack
could happen – when in fact the FBI
had been investigating the possibility of
EXACTLY this kind of attack for almost
TEN YEARS. Numerous previous
attempts at using planes as weapons,
intimate knowledge of terror plans
called Project Bojinka, and knowledge
of suspicious characters attending light
schools who were being monitored by
the FBI make his utterance a clear lie on
its face.
• In the weeks before 9/11, the US
received warnings from all over the world
that an event just like this was about
to happen, but FBI investigations into
suspected terrorists were suppressed
and those warnings were deliberately
disregarded.
• he names of the alleged hijackers, all
ostensibly Muslims, were released to
the public only hours ater the attacks,
despite Mueller saying we had no
knowledge this would happen. his is
an impossible twist of logic. If he didn’t
know of a plan to strike buildings with
planes, how would he know the names of
39
the hijackers?
• Various artefacts were discovered
(planted) in strategic places to “conirm”
the government’s story, but these have all
been dismissed as suspicious planting of
evidence. Since then several individuals
whose names were on that list of
hijackers have turned up alive and well,
living in Arab countries. However, no
attempt has ever been made to update the
list. And why were none of these names
on the airlines’ passenger lists?
• Much like the invasion of Iraq, the
anthrax attacks were designed to
delect attention from unanswered 9/11
questions in the patriotic pandemonium
that followed the tragedy. hese attacks
made large amounts of money for the
president’s father and his friends from
the hasty sale of ineicient drugs to a
panicked populace. he investigation
into these killings was abruptly halted
when the trail of evidence led straight
to the government’s door and has not
been reopened. he anthrax attacks
also amped up the climate of fear and
delected attention from the passage of
the government’s repressive Patriot Act.
• he Patriot Act was presented and
passed in the days ater the tragedy
– supposedly as a response to it .
However, it was clear that this heinous
bill, drated to nullify provisions for
freedom in the US Constitution, was put
together long before 9/11. In addition,
testimony by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)
revealed that most members of Congress
were compelled to vote for the bill
without even reading it. his was a vote
to eliminate the Constitutional Bill of
Rights, which has deined American
freedom for 200 years, and it was
accomplished when legislators voted for
the bill without even reading it.
• he invasion of Afghanistan was
presented as an attempt to pursue the
alleged perpetrators of 9/11, yet it had
been discussed for years prior to the
tragedy and actually planned in the
months before the attacks on New York
and Washington. Statements by Zbigniew
Brzezinski and the Republican-written
Project for a New American Century
have stressed that America needed
a formidable enemy to accomplish
its aggressive geopolitical aims. he
supposed enemy we attacked in
Afghanistan was a diverse group of men
from all over the world who were initially
recruited, encouraged and supported by
the American CIA.
• he hole in the Pentagon was not made
by a jumbo jet. Damage to the building
was simply not consistent with the size of
the aircrat that supposedly hit it. here
was also an almost complete absence of
debris. At the supposed point of impact,
an entire bank of windows remained
unbroken and there were no marks on
the lawn. No airplane debris (except what
was planted on the lawn) nor remains of
passengers were ever found.
• he president has admitted that
he continued to read a story to
schoolchildren in a Florida school for
18 minutes ater being informed that
the irst plane had struck New York and
for several more minutes ater being
informed that the nation was under
attack. He has never explained this
puzzling behaviour, nor how he saw the
irst plane hit. he irst plane hitting the
WTC was never televised, only recorded
by a French crew ilming iremen in New
York. In that
ilm, the plane
in question does
not appear to
be a passenger
airliner.
• he plane in
Pennsylvania
was shot down
and broke
apart in midair.
No other
explanation can
account for the
wreckage, which
was spread over a six-mile area, or the
eyewitness accounts that describe debris
falling from the sky.
• Cell phone calls cannot be made
from airliners in light that are not
close to the ground. As research by
Professor A. K. Dewdney has shown,
the emotional conversations between
hijacked passengers and others would
not have been possible under conditions
that existed at that moment. hese calls
were cynical fabrications, exploiting the
distraught emotions of those who lost
loved ones.
• Radio communications from ireighters
on the upper loors of the Trade Center
towers clearly indicate that ires were
under control and the structure was in no
danger of collapsing.
hese are merely a few of the deliberately
false statements made by US oicials
about 9/11. hey provide crystal clear
evidence that our president, his staf,
and many legislators should be indicted
on charges of treason, obstruction of
justice and mass murder. Above all,
these evil men should be removed from
their positions of authority before they
implement more of their moneymaking
murder schemes like the one they are
now perpetrating on the innocent people
of Iraq.
Otherwise, we face a future of endless
war abroad and merciless repression at
home.
Consider just a few more of the other
unanswered questions from among the
thousands of unexplained loose ends that
all point to 9/11 being an inside job.
• Who beneited from the suspiciously
high numbers of put options purchased
prior to September 11 for shares
in companies whose stock prices
subsequently plummeted, on the
supposition that whoever was behind
the hijacking was also behind most of
the purchases of these put options? And
what was the role of the new executive
director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard,
who handled these transactions?
• Why was the debris from the collapsed
Twin Towers removed from the site
with no forensic examination? Why was
almost all of it sold to scrap merchants
and shipped abroad where it would not
be available for scientiic examination?
• Why does the government
refuse to release any transcripts of
communications or any records at
all relating to signals of any form
transmitted by those jets?
• Why did so many people, from San
Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to many
employees of companies in the World
Trade Center who failed to come to work
40
that day, know in advance that something
bad was going to happen on Sept. 11,
2001?
• Why do all the major US media
continue to act as if none of these
questions is legitimate or relevant?
Today, millions of people around the
world are protesting the criminal
destruction of the nation of Iraq. But
these protests won’t change the number
of minds necessary to stop America’s
criminal madmen from continuing with
their genocidal aim of enslaving the
entire world.
What WILL stop them is spreading the
realisation that President George W. Bush
and his billionaire accomplices in the oil
industry perpetrated 9/11 as an excuse to
begin the militarisation of America for
the purpose of world conquest. History
has shown all too clearly the deceived
American people
WILL support the
destruction of faraway
countries on phony
pretexts of defending
so-called freedom.
hus the needless wars
continue. Right now
we watch high-tech
weapons slaughter the
defenceless people of
Iraq. Soon it will be
Iran, Syria, Colombia,
Venezuela, North
Korea, Egypt, Libya,
Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and who
knows where else. All these misguided
atrocities will be possible because of the
hoax known as 9/11.
If the American people DO tolerate such
an insane strategy, then they clearly do
not deserve to survive as a nation or a
people.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the
coast of Florida and can’t understand why
the president hasn’t been arrested for his
obvious lies and crimes.
http://www.rense.com
Injured WTC Janitor: Collapse
Was Controlled Demolition
By Greg Szymanski
WTC janitor pulls burn victim to safety ater basement explosion rocks north tower seconds before
jetliner hit top loors. Also, two other men trapped and drowning in a basement elevator shat, were
pulled to safety from underground explosion.
It's a miracle Rodriguez, 44, who worked
at the WTC for 20 years, is even alive.
Usually arriving to work at 8:30am, the
morning of 9/11 he reported 30 minutes
late. If he'd arrived on time, it would have
put him at the top loors just about the
same time the jetliner hit the north tower.
"It was a miracle. If I arrived on time,
like always, I'd probably be dead. I would
have been up at the top loors like every
morning," said Rodriguez about the quirk
of fate that saved his life.
But since he was late, Rodriguez found
himself checking into work in an oice on
sub-level when the north tower was hit,
seemingly out of harm's way. However,
the sound and concussion of a massive
explosion in the sub-levels right below
his feet changed that.
"When I heard the sound of the explosion,
the loor beneath my feet vibrated, the
walls started cracking and everything
started shaking," said Rodriguez, who was
huddled together with at least 14 other
people in the oice.
Rodriguez said Anthony Saltamachia,
supervisor for the American Maintenance
Co., was one of the people in the room
who stands ready to verify his story.
"Seconds ater the irst massive explosion
below in the basement still rattled the
loor, I hear another explosion from way
above," said Rodriguez. "Although I was
unaware at the time, this was the airplane
hitting the tower, it occurred moments
ater the irst explosion."
But before Rodriguez had time to think,
co-worker Felipe David stormed into the
basement oice with severe burns on his
face and arms, screaming for help and
yelling "explosion! explosion! explosion!"
David had been in front of a nearby
freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400
feet from the oice when ire burst out of
the elevator shat, causing his injuries.
"He was burned terribly," said Rodriguez.
"he skin was hanging of his hands and
arms. His injuries couldn't have come
from the airplane above, but only from a
massive explosion below. I don't care what
the government says, what scientists say. I
saw a man burned terribly from a ire that
was caused from an explosion below.
"I know there were explosives placed
below the trade center. I helped a man to
safety who is living proof, living proof the
government story is a lie and a cover-up.
"I have tried to tell my story to everybody,
but nobody wants to listen. It is very strange
what is going on here in supposedly the
most democratic country in the world. In
my home country of Puerto Rico and all
the other Latin American countries, I have
been allowed to tell my story uncensored.
But here, I can't even say a word."
Ater Rodriguez escorted David to safety
outside the WTC, he returned to lead the
others in the basement to safety as well.
While there, he also helped two other men
trapped and drowning in the basement
elevator shat, another result he says of the
explosives placed below the tower.
In fact, ater leading these men to safety,
he even made another trip back into the
north tower, against police orders, in order
to rescue people from the top loors.
"I never could make it to the top, but I got
up to the 33rd loor ater getting some of
my equipment and a face mask out of the
janitor's closet," said Rodriguez, adding
he heard a series of small explosions going
of between the 20th and 30th loors,
unrelated to the airplane strike, while
making his way through the stairwell to
the top loors.
41
"Also, when I was on the 33rd loor, I
heard strange sounds coming from the
34th loor, loud noises like someone
moving and thumping heavy equipment
and furniture. I knew this loor was empty
and stripped due to construction work so
I avoided it and continued to make my
way up the stairs."
Rodriguez said he inally reached the
39th loor before being turned back by
ire ighters and then, reluctantly, started
his descent back down and his own light
to safety while, at the same time, hearing
explosions coming from the South Tower.
he Tragedy
he concerted efort by the media and the
government to silence Rodriguez is the
tragedy behind this American hero's story.
And there is no question, Rodriguez is a
"silent hero" for saving so many lives and
for having the courage to continue telling
his story against tremendous odds.
In an efort to open a fair and honest
investigation as to why the WTC
collapsed, Rodriguez has been ignored by
government oicials, the 9/11 Commission
and the National Institute of Safety and
Technology (NIST).
NIST, an independent investigative
group funded by the government, put the
inishing touches this week on its 2 year
$35 million 9/11 investigation. his week
Rodriguez made his inal plea to have his
story heard while testifying at the inal
public hearing held in New York.
"I disagree 100% with the government
story," said Rodriguez. "I met with the
9/11 Commission behind closed doors
and they essentially discounted everything
I said regarding the use of explosives to
bring down the North Tower.
http://www.arcticbeacon.com
 Wargames Were Cover For the
Operational Execution of 9/11
www.prisonplanetweb@hotmail.com
Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
September 8 2004
For almost three years since 9/11
independent researchers have stockpiled
individual “smoking guns” which prove
that the oicial version of events was not
only a lie – but operationally impossible.
However, no single smoking gun has
yet been forwarded to explain why air
defenses categorically reversed Standard
Operating Procedure and failed to
respond to hijacked jetliners.
Until now. More and more individuals
are looking at the facts and highlighting
exercise drills that took place on the
morning of 9/11.
It is clear that at least ive if not six
training exercises were in operation
in the days leading up to and on the
morning of 9/11. his meant that
NORAD radar screens showed as many
as 22 hijacked airliners at the same
time. NORAD had been briefed that
this was part of the exercise drill and
therefore normal reactive procedure was
forestalled and delayed.
he large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD
screens that displayed both real and
'drill' hijacked planes explain why
confused press reports emerged hours
ater the attack stating that up to eight
planes had been hijacked.
he drill scenario also explains a
comment made by air traic control
personnel which was featured in a
July 2004 BBC television report. he
controller is told that a hijacked airliner
is heading for New York and responds by
saying, "is this real world or an exercise?"
Alex Jones was one of the irst to
highlight the war games in his
documentary ilm Masters of Terror
which was released in August 2002. Alex
explains why the Associated Press later
had to admit the fact that the CIA were
running drills of crashing planes into
buildings on the morning of 9/11.
WHaT WERE THE dRIllS
CallEd and WHaT WaS THEIR
naTuRE?
1) OPERATION NORTHERN
VIGILANCE: his was planned months
in advance of 9/11 and ensured that on
the morning of 9/11, jet ighters were
removed from patrolling the US east
coast and sent to Alaska and Canada,
therefore reducing the amount of ighter
planes available to protect the east coast.
2) BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD
II: Alex Jones irst reported on this back
in May when Rudolph Giuliani let the
details of it slip in his testimony to the
9/11 Commission.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management
Authority) arrived in New York on
September 10th to set up a command
post located at Pier 29 under the auspices
of a ‘biowarfare’ exercise scheduled for
September 12. his explains why Tom
Kenney of FEMA’s National Urban
Search and Rescue Team, told Dan
Rather of CBS News that FEMA had
arrived in New York on the night of
September 10th. his was originally
dismissed as a slip of the tongue. Giuliani
was to use this post as a command
post on 9/11 ater he evacuated WTC
Building 7. Giuliani knew when to
leave WTC 7 because he got advanced
warning that the Trade Towers were
about to collapse. "We were operating
out of there when we were told that the
World Trade Center was gonna collapse,"
Rudolph Giuliani told Peter Jennings of
ABC News.
How did Giuliani know the towers were
about to collapse when no steel building
in history had previously collapsed from
ire damage?
3) OPERATION VIGILANT
42
GUARDIAN: his exercise simulated
hijacked planes in the north eastern
sector and started to coincide with 9/11.
Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit's
airborne control and warning oicer, was
overseeing the exercise. At 8:40am she
took a call from Boston Center which
said it had a hijacked airliner. Her irst
words, as quoted by Newhouse News
Service were, "It must be part of the
exercise." his is another example of how
the numerous drills on the morning of
9/11 deliberately distracted NORAD so
that the real hijacked planes couldn't be
intercepted in time.
4) OPERATION NORTHERN
GUARDIAN: he details of this exercise
are still scant but it is considered to be
part of Vigilant Guardian, relating to
simulating hijacked planes in the north
eastern sector.
5) OPERATION VIGILANT WARRIOR:
his was referenced in Richard Clarke's
book Against All Enemies. It is thought
to have been the 'attack' component of
the Vigilant Guardian exercise.
Another example of how air defenses
were purposefully kept preoccupied
so they couldn't protect New York was
reported by this website in December of
2003. he Air National Guard's 177th
Fighter Wing, based at Atlantic City
International Airport in Pomona, were
just eight minutes away from New York
and could have intercepted both Flight
11 and Flight 175.
Under NORAD procedures that date to
the Cold War, two F-16 ighters from the
177th were parked around the clock on
the Atlantic City runway. Pilots waited in
a nearby building, ready to scramble.
But on the morning of 9/11, the F-
16's were performing bombing runs
over an empty stretch of the Pine
Barrens near Atlantic City ater being
decommissioned from their usual role of
protecting the skies of the east coast.
It was only ater both trade towers were
hit that the two F-16s landed and were
reitted with air-to-air missiles, then sent
alot.
Now that we have established how
NORAD were confused, delayed and
distracted by the numerous war games,
the next question to ask is who if anyone
was aware of which planes were 'real
world' and which planes were 'exercise'?
he answer to this question will provide
us with the name of the individual who
ran the operatonal execution of the 9/11
attack.
Dick Cheney.
Cheney was initially taken by the secret
service to an underground bunker in
the White House called the Presidential
Emergency Operations Center.
From there, according to CNN, Cheney
directed the US government's response
to the unfolding attack.
Secretary of Transportation Norman
Mineta was in the Presidential
Emergency Operating Center with
Vice President Cheney as Flight 77
approached Washington, D.C. On
May 23, 2003 in front of the 9/11
Commission, Secretary Mineta testiied:
"During the time that the airplane was
coming in to the Pentagon, there was
a young man who would come in and
say to the Vice President, ‘he plane is
50 miles out.’ he plane is 30 miles out.’
And when it got down to ‘the plane is
10 miles out,’ the young man also said to
the Vice President, ‘Do the orders still
stand?’ And the Vice President turned
and whipped his neck around and said,
‘Of course the orders still stand. Have
you heard anything to the contrary?’"
As the plane in question hit the
Pentagon, what else can we conclude but
that the 'order' was not to shoot down
the aircrat and to let it ind its target.
Mineta stated that he did not know what
the 'order' was because he wasn't there
when it was made.
Ater the Pentagon was hit, Cheney was
transferred to another bunker in what
the Philadelphia Daily News describes as
'the underground Pentagon'.
Site R, a highly secure complex of
buildings inside Raven Rock Mountain
near Blue Ridge Summit, Pa., close to the
Maryland-Pennsylvania state line and
about seven miles north of Camp David,
is a 53-year-old facility conceived at
the start of the Cold War as an alternate
command center in the event of nuclear
war or an attack on Washington.
he bunker is built into a mountain
hillside and is virtually camoulaged
to the naked eye. he location betrays
itself by the vast gaggle of satellites,
microwave towers and antennae that
festoon the perimeter. Inside the facility
there are computer illed caverns and
communication and tracking technology
that would put a James Bond movie to
shame.
he entire facility is guarded by heavily
armed military police.
Within hours of 9/11 unfolding, ive
choppers had landed on the facility's
helipad and top oicials such as Paul
43
Wolfowitz were ushered in to join
Cheney in the command bunker.
Site R - also known as Raven Rock or the
Alternate Joint Communications Center
is from where vice-President Dick
Cheney ran the atermath of the 9/11
attack. Cheney's command superceded
the orders of the Pentagon, the FAA or
the White House. He is the number one
suspect in the murder of nearly 3,000
innocent people.
In May of 2001, by presidential order,
Cheney was handed direct control
of all war game and drill operations.
his meant he was solely in charge of
the overlapping NORAD drills and
war games on the morning of 9/11,
that prevented Standard Operating
Procedure from being implemented,
and any of the hijacked planes being
intercepted.
he smoking guns of 9/11 are no longer
disparate jigsaw pieces that serve to just
raise more questions than they answer.
We now have a coherent and plausible
explanation of how the events unfolded,
why there was no air defense response,
and a prime suspect as to who executed
these actions. he facts it this version of
events.
he 9/11 truth movement has just taken
a giant leap towards dismantling the
lies of September 11and inally ofering
justice for those who lost their lives on
that terrible day.
A inal note: One VERY important
point one talks about anymore: he air
traic controllers were ORDERED to
take the tape recordings of 911 and cut
them up into 1/4" pieces and scatter
them in DIFFERENT
wastebaskets. WHO
GAVE THIS ORDER?
The US military
has had the ability
to ly jet aircraft
using remote control
technology since at
least the 1950s. In
the 1990s they lew
a jet from California
to Australia using
this “Global Hawk”
technology. Here is an
early story from 1959.
If a large passenger jet didn’t hit the
Pentagon, what did?
A-3 Military Jet Secretly Re-Fitted
With Missiles Just Prior to 9/11;
Places More Doubt On Oicial Story
Former Republican Washington insider
speaks with employees who worked on
secret jet project and who now fear for
their lives since others who worked on
the project have mysteriously turned
up dead
May 27, 2005
By Greg Szymanski
A one time Republican insider, now
turned party rebel, said he has uncovered
more damaging evidence, proving the
government‚'s oicial story about 9/11 is
"nothing but a pack of lies."
Karl Schwarz of Georgia, who was one
of the main architects of the Republican
takeover of Congress during the Clinton
Presidency, has made inding the truth
about the WTC attacks his passion and
his new mission.
Recently he uncovered an obscure piece
of video footage, clearly showing a
757 jetliner did not strike the WTC as
reported by the government.
Now Schwarz said he has uncovered
explosive evidence that will eventually
prove "something other than a 757
jetliner hit the Pentagon" also contrary to
government reports.
"I have been told by two civilian defense
contractors employees that they and
others retro-itted missiles and remote
control systems onto A-3 jets at a
Colorado public airport just prior to
September 11 in a highly secretive
government operation carried out under
the cover of darkness," said Schwarz, who
added the employees asked to remain
anonymous in order to protect their lives.
he men told Schwarz that recently
several suspicious suicides and fatal car
wrecks, involving others who worked
on the A-3 project at the Fort Collins-
Loveland Municipal Airport, have made
them uneasy and fearful about "going
public" with their story.
"What makes this testimony important
is previously A-3 parts were uncovered
in the Pentagon wreckage, parts that
are much smaller than those of a
Boeing 757," said Schwarz, who has
been extremely critical of the Bush
administration‚'s handling of 9/11.
Recently, over his distrust of Bush
and the general neo-con take over
of America, Schwarz has decided to
throw his own hat in the Presidential
ring in 2008 under the banner of new
independent party yet to be named.
Regarding the Pentagon crash, when
Schwarz refers to the A-3 parts found
at the 9/11 crash site, he is referring to
the Federal Emergency Management
Administration (FEMA) photographs
taken immediately ater the attacks. he
photographs clearly indicated that the
few aircrat parts found at the Pentagon
did not
it the description of Boeing 757 parts but
rather it the description of a small jet,
very similar to an A-3 Sky
Warrior
he Pentagon crash has always been an
"Achilles Heel" in the government's 9/11
oicial story as independent investigators
have compiled strong evidence revealing
the improbability if not impossibility of a
large Boeing 757 causing the strike.
44
he 16-foot entry hole let from the
Pentagon impact has been the subject of
much debate with
investigators, who have been denied
access to most of the remaining evidence,
including aircrat parts and surveillance
photos immediately coniscated by agents
ater the crash. Investigators nonetheless
speculate that an air-to-ground missile
(AGM) possibly ired from a small
military jet caused the hole.
Besides the several parts recovered
ater the crash resembling parts from
a A-3 Sky Warrior jet, investigators
call attention to the fact FBI agents
within minutes ater impact coniscated
surveillance tapes and even a tape from
a gas station across the street from the
Pentagon, which had a clear view of the
incoming object.
Further, they cite initial reports made
by air traic controllers, who reported
the incoming object headed towards the
Pentagon was a small military jet instead
of a commercial Boeing 757. Since the
initial report, controllers, however, have
been silenced by oicial gag orders and
subpoena or even have not sought their
testimony by the recent 9/11
Commission.
"It‚'s all very suspicious," said Schwarz,
who also said the government agents
quickly removed most of the wreckage
evidence from the scene, obstructed
justice and basically tampered with a
murder scene investigation. "To date
none of this evidence has been inspected
or used to determine what hit the
Pentagon."
Highly suspicious over the obvious
government cover-up, Schwarz said his
personal investigation led him to the (United 175). Air Force Base, which has numerous
Ft.Collins Municipal Airport and his decommissioned planes taken out of
discussions with the employees who re- "Why were they all on these planes? service and stored there in an arid
itted the A-3 Sky Warrior with AGM Nobody‚'s ever bothered to ind out," environment," said Schwarz, adding that
missiles just prior to 9/11. asked Schwarz. "hey all died without using an out-of-service plane would
a grand jury investigation into their erase any paper trail identifying the
"he two witnesses say that separate records, visits or calls to Ft. Collins- actual jet.
military contractor teams working Loveland airport or testimony related
independently at diferent times reitted to other related matter involving the re- "Whoever did this had about a billion
the military jets with updated missiles, itting of the A-3''s prior to 9/11" . dollars to work with, according to my
Raytheon's Global Hawk unmanned intelligence sources who have come
aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control Schwarz said the men were unaware of forward. One crew came in to it the
systems, ire control systems, engines, the A-3 jets destinations ater the work jet for remote-UAV systems, another
transponders, and radio-radar- was completed, but said each was placed crew put in the ire control systems
navigation systems—a total makeover, in a small, separate hanger just big and another installed the new jet
seemingly for an operation more enough for a work crew and one A-3 Sky engines, another the AGMs, etc., and
important than just a simple missile Warrior. all at diferent times to spread out the
testing platform for defence contractor information low on who did what."
Hughes-Raytheon," said Schwarz, who "he men told me speciically they were
interviewed the employees in February. instructed and under strict orders not Schwarz said the military's likely
"It is very interesting that the Hughes to discuss what the military teams were response to the whole story is that the
division manufactures the AGMs while doing or what they saw," said Schwarz. A-3's were being itted with system
the Raytheon division maintains the platforms to test-ire missiles. However,
last few A-3 Sky Warriors in operation According to available government he added the timeline for the re-
and also manufactures the Global Hawk records, the Air Force has at least four ittings and the recovery of A-3 parts
UAV remote control systems." A-3s in current operation and Hughes- at the Pentagon crash site makes the
Raytheon has 12-14 Sky Warriors government possible response highly
Schwarz said he began researching operating, according to available records. speculative if not totally unbelievable.
Raytheon records for any connections
to 9/11, inding out that only Raytheon "he plane used at the Pentagon on For more informative articles, go to
executives and the Air Force would have 9/11 may have been brought in from www.arcticbeacon.com.
known any inside information on the Tucson, Arizona from Davis-Monthan
A-3 systems as well as who
was involved in the re-itting
operations. Whatever happened to the WTC Hard Drive recoveries?
Coincidentally, ive key Unusual Stock Trading: Reuters' Erik Kirschbaum reported in his December 16th story,
Raytheon executives died "German Firm Probes Final World Trade Center Deals," that "German computer experts
onboard three of the four are working around the clock to unlock the truth behind an unexplained surge in inancial
doomed 9/11 lights, a transactions made just before the two planes crashed into the WTC on September 11th."
mystery that Schwarz These are questions that have been whispered by stock brokers around the country since
claims is more than the irst week of the tragedy. Were criminals responsible for the sharp rise in credit card
just a coincidence. he transactions that moved through some computer systems at the WTC shortly before the
executives who perished
planes hit the twin towers? Or was it coincidence that unusually large sums of money,
on 9/11 include: Stanley
Hall, director of the perhaps more than $100 million, were rushed through the computers as the disaster
Electronic Warfare Program unfolded?
(American 77); David
Kovalcin, senior mechanical A world leader in retrieving data, German-based irm Convar is trying to answer those
engineer for Electronic questions and help credit card companies, accountants, and telecommunications irms
Systems (American 11); in New York recover their records from computer hard drives that have been partially
Peter Gay, vice president damaged by ire, water or ine dust.
of Electronic Systems on
special assignment at the Using a pioneering laser scanning technology to ind data on damaged computer hard
El Segundo, CA division
drives and main frames found in the rubble of the WTC and other nearby collapsed
oice where the Global
Hawk UAV remote control buildings, Convar has recovered information from 32 computers that support
system is made (American assumptions of "Black Tuesday" dirty dealings. 4,516 Put Options were purchased for
11); Kenneth Waldie, American Airlines with only 748 Call Options. No other airlines showed similar trading
senior quality control patterns to those experienced by United and American, the two that were used in the
engineer for Electronic attacks. These two were 600% above the normal day's trades. From 9/6 through 9/10/01,
Systems (American 11); and Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, et al. also noticed highly abnormal levels of Put Options
Herbert Homer, a corporate on these two airline stocks.
executive working with the --Pat Shannon
Department of Defense

45
 T O TA L M E D IA B L AC KO U T
NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
By Christopher Bollyn
Seismographs at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded
strange seismic activity on Sept. 11
Two unexplained “spikes” in the seismic
record from Sept. 11 indicate huge bursts
of energy shook the ground beneath
the World Trade Center’s twin towers
immediately prior to the collapse.
American Free Press has learned of pools
of “molten steel” found at the base of the
collapsed twin towers weeks ater the
collapse. Although the energy source
for these incredibly hot areas has yet to
be explained, New York seismometers
recorded huge bursts of energy, which
caused unexplained seismic “spikes” at
the beginning of each collapse.
hese spikes suggest that massive
underground explosions may have
literally knocked the towers of their
foundations, causing them to collapse.
In the basements of the collapsed towers,
where the 47 central support columns
connected with the bedrock, hot spots of
“literally molten steel” were discovered
more than a month ater the collapse.
Such persistent and intense residual heat,
70 feet below the surface, in an oxygen
starved environment, could explain how
these crucial structural supports failed.
Peter Tully, president of Tully
Construction of Flushing, N.Y., told AFP
that he saw pools of “literally molten
steel” at the World Trade Center.
Tully was contracted ater the Sept. 11
tragedy to remove the debris from the
site.
Tully called Mark Loizeaux, president
of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI)
of Phoenix, Md., for consultation about
removing the debris. CDI calls itself
“the innovator and global leader in the
controlled demolition and implosion of
structures.”
Loizeaux, who cleaned up the bombed
Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in be “a smoky smoldering pile.”
Oklahoma City, arrived at the WTC site
two days later and wrote the clean-up Experts disagree that jet-fuel or paper
plan for the entire operation. could generate such heat.
Below: Video sequences of massive explosion(s) apparently
coming from the basement of the WTC)
AFP asked Loizeaux about the report of
molten steel on the site.
“Yes,” he said, “hot spots of molten steel
are in the basements.”
hese incredibly hot areas were found
“at the bottoms of the elevator shats of
the main towers, down seven [basement]
levels,” Loizeaux said.
he molten steel was found “three, four,
and ive weeks later, when the rubble was
being removed,” Loizeaux said. He said
molten steel was also found at 7 WTC,
which collapsed mysteriously in the late
aternoon.
Construction steel has an extremely high
melting point of about 1500 degrees C.
Asked what could have caused such
extreme heat, Tully said, “hink of the jet
fuel.”
Loizeaux told AFP that the steel-melting
ires were fueled by “paper, carpet and
other combustibles packed down the
elevator shats by the tower loors as they
‘pancaked’ into the basement.”
However, some independent investigators
dispute this claim, saying kerosene-based
jet fuel, paper, or the other combustibles
normally found in the towers, cannot
generate the heat required to melt
steel, especially in an oxygen-poor
environment like a deep basement.
Eric Hufschmid, author of a book about
the WTC collapse, Painful Questions,* told
AFP that due to the lack of oxygen, paper
and other combustibles packed down at the
bottom of elevator shats would probably
46
his is impossible, they say, because
the maximum temperature that can
be reached by hydrocarbons like jet-
fuel burning in air is 793 degrees C.
Because the WTC ires were fuel rich, as
evidenced by the thick black smoke, it is
argued that they did not reach this upper
limit.
he hottest spots at the surface of the
rubble, where abundant oxygen was
available, were much cooler than the
molten steel found in the basements.
Five days ater the collapse, on Sept.
16, the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) used
an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging
Spectrometer (AVIRIS) to locate and
he destruction of the WTC
Exactly in the moment when the
south tower collapses there is
another explosion in WTC 6. he
white dust cloud in the foreground is
clearly visible. he upper part of the
WTC 6 is blown up by the explosion.
measure the site’s hot spots.
Dozens of hot spots were mapped, the
hottest being in the east corner of the
South Tower where a temperature of 725
degrees C was recorded.
his is, however, less than half as hot as
the molten steel in the basement.
he foundations of the twin towers were
23 metres deep. At that level, 47 huge
box columns, connected to the bedrock,
supported the entire gravity load of the
structures. he steel walls of these lower
box columns were 8.8 cm thick.
Videos of the North Tower collapse
show its communication mast falling
WTC 6 explodes
47
irst, indicating that the central support
columns must have failed at the very
beginning of the collapse. Loizeaux told
AFP, “Everything went simultaneously.”
“At 10:29 the entire top section of the
North Tower had been severed from the
base and began falling down,” Hufschmid
writes. “If the irst event was the falling
of a loor, how did that progress to the
severing of hundreds of columns?”
Asked if the vertical support columns
gave way before the connections
between the loors and the columns, Ron
Hamburger, a structural engineer with
the FEMA assessment team said, “hat’s
the $64,000 question.”
Loizeaux said, “If I were to bring the
towers down, I would put explosives in
the basement to get the weight of the
building to help collapse the structure.”
SEISMIC ‘SPIKES’
Seismographs at Columbia University’s
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of
the WTC, recorded strange seismic
activity on Sept. 11 that has still not been
explained.
While the aircrat crashes caused
minimal earth shaking, signiicant
earthquakes with unusual spikes
occurred at the beginning of each
collapse.
he Palisades seismic data recorded a
2.1 magnitude earthquake during the
10-second collapse of the South Tower
at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the
8-second collapse of the North Tower at
10:28:31.
However, the Palisades seismic record
shows that as the collapses began a huge
seismic “spike” marked the moment the
greatest energy went into the ground. he
strongest jolts were all registered at the
beginning of the collapses, well before the
falling debris struck the Earth.
hese unexplained “spikes” in the seismic
data lend credence to the theory that
massive explosions at the base of the
towers caused the collapses.
A “sharp spike of short duration” is how
seismologist horne Lay of University
of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an
underground nuclear explosion appears
on a seismograph.
he two unexplained spikes are more
than 20 times the amplitude of the
other seismic waves associated with the
collapses and occurred in the East-West
seismic recording as the buildings began
to fall.
Experts cannot explain why the seismic
waves peaked before the towers actually
Painful Questions
(Item# 1051, $20, 160 pages, sotcover)
Available from First Amendment Books, 645 Pennsylvania
Avenue SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003
Call (USA) 1-888-699-6397 to order by Visa or MasterCard.
hit the ground.
Asked about these spikes, seismologist
Arthur Lerner-Lam, director of
Columbia University’s Center for Hazards
and Risk Research told AFP, “his is
an element of current research and
discussion. It is still being investigated.”
Lerner-Lam told AFP that a 10-fold
increase in wave amplitude indicates
a 100-fold increase in energy released.
hese “short-period surface waves,”
relect “the interaction between the
ground and the building foundation,”
according to a report from Columbia
Earth Institute.
“he seismic efects of the collapses
are comparable to the explosions at a
gasoline tank farm near Newark on Jan.
7, 1983,” the Palisades Seismology Group
reported on Sept. 14, 2001.
One of the seismologists, Won-Young
Kim, told AFP that the Palisades
seismographs register daily underground
explosions from a quarry 20 miles away.
hese blasts are caused by 80,000
pounds of ammonium nitrate and cause
local earthquakes between Magnitude
1 and 2. Kim said the 1993 truck-
bomb at the WTC did not register on
the seismographs because it was “not
coupled” to the ground.
“Only a small fraction of the energy from
the collapsing towers was converted into
ground motion,” Lerner-Lam said. “he
ground shaking that resulted from the
collapse of the towers was extremely
small.”
Last November, Lerner-Lam said:
“During the collapse, most of the energy
of the falling debris was absorbed by the
towers and the neighboring structures,
converting them into rubble and dust or
causing other damage – but not causing
signiicant ground shaking.”
Evidently, the energy source that shook
the ground beneath the towers was many
48
times more powerful than the total
potential energy released by the falling
mass of the towers. he question is: What
was that energy source?
While steel is oten tested for evidence of
explosions, despite numerous eyewitness
reports of explosions in the towers,
the engineers involved in the FEMA-
sponsored building assessment did no
such tests.
Dr. W. Gene Corley, who investigated for
the government the cause of the ire at
the Branch Davidian compound in Waco
and the Oklahoma City bombing, headed
the FEMA-sponsored engineering
assessment of the WTC collapse.
Corley told AFP that while some tests
had been done on the 80 pieces of
steel saved from the site, he said he did
not know about tests that show if an
explosion had afected the steel.
“I am not a metallurgist,” Corley said.
Much of the structural steel from the
WTC was sold to Alan D. Ratner of
Metal Management of Newark, N.J., and
the New York-based company Hugo Neu
Schnitzer East.
Ratner, who heads the New Jersey branch
of the Chicago-based company, sold
the WTC steel to overseas companies,
reportedly selling more than 50,000 tons
of steel to a Shanghai steel company
known as Baosteel for $120 per ton.
Ratner paid about $70 per ton for the
steel.
Other shipments of steel from the WTC
went to India and other Asian ports.
Ratner came to Metal Management ater
spending years with a metal trading irm
known as SimsMetal based out of Sydney,
Australia.
Bush Insider Asserts
WTC Collapse Rigged
By Greg Szymanski www.arcticbeacon.com
When Morgan Reynolds called the oicial
story about 9/11 bogus, it seemed like the
whole world stopped for a moment to
listen.
It seemed like a lighting bolt hit the heart
of the government story, cracking it into a
million unexplainable pieces.
And when the dust settled from his
explosive statements, the highest-ranking
member of the Bush team to make such
an accusation said he wasn’t expecting any
“invitations to the White House anytime
soon.”
Two weeks ago, the former chief
economist in the Labor Department
during President Bush’s irst term told the
world he thought the WTC fell from a
controlled demolition, indicating 9/11 was
“an inside government job.”
Reynolds, a respected economist and
former Republican conservative, made his
claims ater researching many aspects of
9/11, including scientiic and engineering
data for and against the government story.
He presented his indings on the Internet
in a long, detailed article, concluding:
“It is hard to exaggerate the importance of
a scientiic debate over the cause(s) of the
collapse of the twin towers and Building
7. If the oicial wisdom on the collapses is
wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based
on such erroneous engineering analysis is
not likely to be correct either.
“he government’s collapse theory is
highly vulnerable on its own terms.
Only professional demolition appears
to account for the full range of facts
associated with the collapse of the three
buildings.
“More importantly, momentous political
and social consequences would follow
if impartial observers concluded that
professionals imploded the WTC.
Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers
and impartial researchers everywhere is to
get the scientiic and engineering analysis
of 9/11 right.”
Considering his place among the
Republican faithful, once the media got
its “claws into his controversial remarks,”
his words quickly spread with the help of
cyberspace like an out of control wildire.
Not only did millions read his story on
the Internet, but Reynolds’ controversial
comments then drew instant attention
from numerous mainstream newspapers,
radio and television stations, including
UPI, MSNBC, FOX News and over a
dozen other major market local radio and
TV stations.
It was a story that “grew wings,” a story
Reynolds never expected would get so
much attention and such a large audience.
“I had a huge response and it really was
amazing. I never expected so many
people to respond so passionately,”
said Reynolds this week in a telephone
interview. “I literally received hundreds
and hundred of emails, some agreeing
with me and others, of course, disagreeing.
“Ater it was all said and done, as things are
starting to inally quiet down now, I would
guess it was about 5 to 1 in favour of what
I was saying. However, I never imagined
how much support there was out there for
what I was suggesting occurred on 9/11.”
Without mincing words, as he did in his
article, Reynolds quickly changed
the subject, again placing the blame
squarely on the government for not
coming clean about what happened on
9/11, saying it’s important to get to
the bottom of a “story that dwarfs all
others in comparison.”
“What it boils down to is that the
government and the mainstream media
are not digging into the 9/11 controversy
because they are hiding something,” said
Reynolds. “From a media point of view, it’s
the story of the century and they are not
even trying to connect the dots.”
Continuing to throw some punches at his
former employer, he added:
“It’s nothing new. he government has
always lied about so many things. Look at
49
the “Downing Street Memo”, for example,
the document conirming that the Bush
administration lied to us about its motives
for getting into the war.
“If they lied to us about this, what else?
Well, 9/11 is just another example.”
To add more fuel to the hot 9/11
controversy, William Rodriguez, the
WTC janitor who heard and felt a strong
explosion in the basement levels of the
north tower just seconds before the jetliner
crashed into the top loors, recently came
forward to tell his story, adding further
credibility to Reynolds’ conclusions.
Rodriguez claims a massive underground
explosion brought down the towers. His
story is strengthened further by 14 other
eye witnesses who can verify his claims, as
well as a burn victim from the basement
explosion whom he helped to safety.
Immediately following 9/11, Rodriguez
tried to tell his story, but claims
the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream
media have systematically censored his
words in order to protect the oicial
government story, a story ignoring the
possibility of explosives being used to
bring down the WTC.
Commenting on Rodriguez, Reynolds
said: “It’s not a coincidence that there
was irst an explosion below and then the
jetliner explosion seconds later above. At
least there should have been a thorough
investigation since the timing of the
explosions strikes me as an impossibility
if you believe, as the government
contends, that only a jetliner brought
down the towers.”
Reynolds added that nobody from the
Bush administration has oicially
contacted him about his statements
suggesting 9/11 was an “inside job,” but
said he was aware that “administration
operatives” have carried his message into
the halls of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
“How high up it went, I just don’t know,”
he added.
 SPECIAL REPORT ON “DU”
he US, the UK and Australia have been using
“depleted uranium” weapons in Iraq since the irst
Gulf War in 1991. “DU” is derived from radioactive
waste, largely from nuclear power plants. It is in
many respects “the ideal weapon” for killing millions
of people slowly, by giving them cancer. his is a
rough sketch about what these weapons do to people,
not only in Iraq, but throughout the world.
A “Depleted
Uranium”
(DU) Primer
• America’s bombing of other countries
with radioactive waste is possibly
the most egregious war crime ever
committed.
• Nothing that Hitler or Stalin did can
truly be compared with the endless
sufering caused by DU weapons.
• Not only are our allies participating
in the wanton extermination of life, but
they are destroying the planet, rendering
certain regions of the earth uninhabitable
until the end of time!
“Dear Friends, you will not like what am
about to tell you. Ignorance is bliss. If
I were a more compassionate colleague
I would sit down right now and keep
quiet. But I am not. We are in the process
of destroying an entire society. It is as
simple and terrifying as that. It is illegal
and immoral. More than 1.5 million
Iraqis have died, a third of them children
under the age of 5, in this calculated
mass murder of innocent people.” - Denis
Halliday, former UN Assistant Secretary-
General and Humanitarian Coordinator
in Iraq on his resignation in 1998
Systematic Destruction
• housands of academics, scientists and
prominent Iraqi politicians have been
murdered by American Forces.
• Some 84 percent of Iraq’s institutions of
higher education have been burnt, looted,
or trashed.
• Hospitals have been destroyed to erase
the number of civilians killed by U.S.
troops in hospital data banks.
Atomic Radiation Poisoning
• At one time we were fearful of a nuclear
war that might make our beautiful
planet uninhabitable. We protested
against French nuclear tests. Now it has
happened. We cannot see it, touch it,
smell it, hear it or sense it in any way
yet it is slowly destroying us, our future
generations and our planet. Perhaps I can
be thankful that I am not a grandfather.
Refusing to clean up and
treat is purposeful genocide
• he Army is required by US law to
treat all persons afected and all areas
contaminated by the radioactive uranium
munitions. here are no ifs, ands, or buts.
• hey absolutely refuse to treat the
people poisoned, including their own
troopers, and refuse to clean up the
poisoned radioactive land.
• As one Vietnam War medic says
“Uranium weapons are like Agent Orange
on steriods.”
• Depleted uranium aerosols have
permanently contaminated vast regions
• Slowly destroying the genetic future
of populations living in those regions,
where there are resources which the US
must control, in order to establish and
maintain American primacy.
Gulf War veteran Melissa
Sterry:
• “Eight of us served together,” she said
about her buddies in the National Guard.
“here are two of us let alive. ... I’d like to
live to see 45 - most of my friends didn’t
make it to 30.”
Melissa served for six months at a
supply base in Kuwait during the winter
of 1991-92. Part of her job with the
National Guard’s Combat Equipment
Company A was to clean out tanks and
other armoured vehicles that had been
used during the war, preparing them for
storage.
22,000,000 new cancer cases
• In the 2003 Gulf War, estimates of 2200
tons of depleted uranium have been
spread around Iraq. [United Kingdom
Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA)]
• Terry Johnson, public afairs specialist
at the VA, recently reported that veterans
of both Persian Gulf wars now on
disability total 518,739. (hursday, May
50
19, 2005)
Illegal Weapons Of Mass
Destruction
• Depleted uranium munitions are
classiied by a United Nations resolution
as illegal weapons of mass destruction.
• heir use breaches all international
laws, treaties and conventions forbidding
poisoned weapons calculated to cause
unnecessary sufering.
Legality test for Weapons
Under International Law
• TEMPORAL TEST
Weapons must not continue to act ater
the battle is over.
• ENVIRONMENTAL TEST
Weapons must not be unduly harmful to
the environment.
• TERRITORIAL TEST
Weapons must not act of of the
battleield.
• HUMANENESS TEST
Weapons must not kill or wound
inhumanely.
DU ‘Trashes the body’
• “I would say that it is the perfect
weapon for killing lots of people.”
– Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist
and former scientist with the
Manhattan Project and the National
Laboratory at Livermore, California
Depleted uranium is toxic
• he size of the nano-particles allows
them to pass freely throughout the
organism and into the nucleus of its cells.
• Exposure to nano-particles causes
diferent symptoms than exposure to
larger particles of the same substance.
Marion Fulk has developed a “particle
theory” about how DU nano-particles
afect human DNA.
Depleted Uranium in Iraq
• he long-term efect of depleted
uranium weapons is a “virtual death
sentence” - Arthur Bernklau, executive
director of Veterans for Constitutional
Law in New York • DU dust does more
than wreak havoc on the immune
systems of those who breathe it or touch
it; the substance also alters one’s genetic
code.
Why is depleted uranium so
dangerous?
• DU’s chemical instability causes 1
million times more genetic damage than
would be expected from its radiation
efect aloneo 1 mg of DU (a barely visible
dust particle) ires not 1 but 850 alpha
bullets every MINUTE, or over 8 million
bullets in a single week until the end of
time.
Most Iraq veterans will sufer
from DU poisoning within 5
years
• U.S, British and Australian troops
deployed in Iraq are the walking dead.
• Humans and animals, friends and foes
in the fallout zone are destined to a long
downhill spiral of chronic illness and
disability.
• Kidney dysfunction, lung damage,
bloody stools, extreme fatigue, joint pain,
unsteady gait, memory loss and rashes.
• Ultimately, cancer and premature death
await those exposed to depleted uranium.
DU is as much an immune
system killer such as AIDS.
• Any person now in Iraq who has not
inhaled lethal radioactive dust is not
breathing.
• Sick vets were found to be expressing
uranium in even their semen.
heir sexual partners oten complained
of a burning sensation during inter-
course, followed by their own debilitating
illnesses.
• Deformed babies follow.
A Bright Future for Planet
Earth?
• he use of depleted uranium weaponry
by the United States, UK and Australia,
defying all international treaties, will
slowly annihilate all species on earth
including the human species,
• And yet these countries continue to do
so with full knowledge of its destructive
potential.
• As a result, DU particles have engulfed
the world in a radioactive poison gas that
promises illness and death for billions.
Dr. Rosalie Bertell one of the 46
international radiation expert authors of Is the NZ government
the ECRR report:
complicit?
• he concept of species annihilation
means a relatively swit, deliberately • Yes, through failing to inform the
induced end to history, culture, science, public
biological reproduction and memory. • Yes, through failing to speak out
• It is the ultimate human rejection of the • Yes, by sending troops to Afghanistan
git of life, an act which requires a new and Iraq
• Why? Fear of US retribution?
word to describe it: “omnicide.”
• Global radioactive contamination from
atmospheric testing was the equivalent Oh my God; what do we do
of 40,000 Hiroshima bombs, and still now?
contaminates the atmosphere and lower
orbital space today. • You cannot un-know what you have
• he amount of low level radioactive just learned
pollution from depleted uranium • Find out for yourselves
released since 1991, is many times more • Will DU poisoning afect us?
(deposited internally in the body), than
was released from atmospheric testing Fortunately, NZ is a long way from
fallout. the radiation source, but the DU dust
can afect the people of NZ. As for the
Metal of Dishonor Americans, over 60% of American Iraq
veterans will sufer permanent disability
for the rest of their shortened lives. A
• In the IAC’s 1997 book Metal of
single particle of DU smaller than 5
Dishonor: Depleted Uranium, co-
microns can expose the surrounding
author John Catalinotto
tissue to radiation
estimates that the
radioactive dosage from
a single ingested particle
Is the NZ 800 times the
annual dosage
of DU, is equivalent to government permitted by the
Nuclear Regulatory
one chest X-ray per hour,
for life (or what remains complicit? Commission (NRC)
for the entire body.
of it).
• As a heavy metal (in fact
the heaviest, far ahead of
• Yes, through failing to
mercury and lead), DU inform the public Nuremberg
Tribunal, 1950
also exhibits high levels • Yes, through failing to
of chemical toxicity, with
all the associated health
speak out
• “Individuals have
hazards, including kidney • Yes, by sending troops to international duties
damage, arterial damage, Afghanistan and Iraq which transcend the
and cancer.
• Why? Fear of US national obligations
of obedience...and
Dr Rosalie Bertell one retribution? therefore have a duty
of the 46 international to violate domestic
radiation expert authors laws to prevent
of the ECRR report: crimes against peace and humanity from
occurring.”
• We always have to remember that the
future generations on this planet are Far from banning DU, America and
not nebulous, we are right now carrying Britain have stepped up their denials of
them in our bodies, they don’t come from the harm from this radioactive dust as
out of space! more and more troops from the irst Gulf
• hey come from the sperm and the war and from action and peacekeeping
ovum that are right now living in the in the Balkans and Afghanistan have
bodies of people living on this planet. become seriously ill.
If we destroy that, we have no way of
putting it back together again - 1990
speech by Dr Bertell in Oslo.
• She has attributed 1.3 billion worldwide
casualties (deaths and sicknesses), to
nuclear plants and atmospheric testing
(he Ecologist, November 1999)
51
 SPECIAL REPORT ON “DU”
Horror Of
Depleted
Uranium Not
Limited To Iraq
By James Denver
“I’m horriied. he people out there - the
Iraqis, the media and the troops - risk
the most appalling ill health. And the
radiation from depleted uranium can
travel literally anywhere. It’s going to
destroy the lives of thousands of children,
all over the world. We all know how far
radiation can travel. Radiation from
Chernobyl reached Wales and in Britain
you sometimes get red dust from the
Sahara on your car.”
he speaker is not some alarmist doom-
sayer. He is Dr. Chris Busby, the British
radiation expert, Fellow of the University
of Liverpool in the Faculty of Medicine
and UK representative on the European
Committee on Radiation Risk, talking
about the best-kept secret of this war: the
fact that, by illegally using hundreds of
tons of depleted uranium (DU) against
Iraq, Britain and America have gravely
endangered not only the Iraqis but the
whole world.
hese weapons have released deadly,
carcinogenic and mutagenic, radioactive
particles in such abundance that
– whipped up by sandstorms and carried
on trade winds – there is no corner of
the globe they cannot penetrate. For
the wind has no boundaries and time is
on their side: the radioactivity persists
for over 4,500,000,000 years and can
cause cancer, leukemia, brain damage,
kidney failure, and extreme birth defects
– killing millions of people of every age
for centuries to come. his is a crime
against humanity which may, in the eyes
of historians, rank as the worst atrocity of
all time.
Yet, oicially, no crime has been
committed. For this is a dirty story in
which the facts have been concealed
from those who have needed them most.
It is also a story we need to know if the
people of Iraq are to get the medical care
they desperately need, and if our troops,
returning from Iraq, are not to sufer as
terribly as the veterans of other conlicts
in which depleted uranium was used.
A Dirty Tyson
‘Depleted’ uranium is in many ways a
misnomer. in that the words ‘depleted’
sounds weak. he only weak thing about
depleted uranium is its price. It is dirt
cheap, toxic, waste from nuclear power
plants and bomb production. However,
uranium is one of earth’s heaviest
elements and DU packs a Tyson’s punch,
smashing through tanks, buildings and
bunkers with equal ease, spontaneously
catching ire as it does so, and burning
people alive. ‘Crispy critters’ is what
US servicemen call those unfortunate
enough to be close.
When John Pilger encountered children
killed at a greater distance he wrote:
“he children’s skin had folded back, like
parchment, revealing veins and burnt
lesh that seeped blood, while the eyes,
intact, stared straight ahead. I vomited.”
(Daily Mirror)
he millions of radioactive uranium
oxide particles released when it burns can
kill just as surely, but far more terribly.
hey can even be so tiny they pass
through a gas mask, making protection
against them impossible. Yet, small is
not beautiful. For these invisible killers
indiscriminately attack men, women,
children and even babies in the womb-
and do the gravest harm of all to children
and unborn babies.
A Terrible Legacy
Doctors in Iraq have estimated that birth
defects have increased by 2-6 times,
and 3-12 times as many children have
developed cancer and leukaemia since
1991. Moreover, a report published in
he Lancet in 1998 said that as many as
500 children a day are dying from these
sequels to war and sanctions and that
the death rate for Iraqi children under 5
years of age increased from 23 per 1000
in 1989 to 166 per thousand in 1993.
Overall, cases of lymphoblastic leukemia
more than quadrupled with other cancers
also increasing ‘at an alarming rate’. In
men, lung, bladder, bronchus, skin, and
stomach cancers showed the highest
increase. In women, the highest increases
were in breast and bladder cancer, and
non-Hodgkin lymphoma.1
52
On hearing that DU had been used in
the Gulf in 1991, the UK Atomic Energy
Authority sent the Ministry of Defence a
special report on the potential damage to
health and the environment. It said that
it could cause half a million additional
cancer deaths in Iraq over 10 years. In
that war the authorities only admitted
to using 320 tons of DU – although the
Dutch charity LAKA estimates the true
igure is closer to 800 tons. Many times
that may have been spread across Iraq
by the current war. he devastating
damage all this DU will do to the health
and fertility of the people of Iraq now,
and for generations to come, is beyond
imagining.
he radioactivity from DU persists for
over 4,500,000,000 years killing millions
of every age for centuries to come. his
is a crime against humanity which may
rank with the worst atrocities of all time.
We must also count the numberless
thousands of miscarried babies. Nobody
knows how many Iraqis have died in
the womb since DU contaminated their
world. But troops who were only exposed
to DU for the brief period of the war
were still excreting uranium in their
semen 8 years later and some had 100
times the so-called ‘safe limit’ of uranium
in their urine.
he lack of government interest in the
plight of veterans of the 1991 war is
relected in a lack of academic research
on the impact of DU. However, informal
research has found a high incidence of
birth defects in their children and that
the wives of men who served in Iraq
have three times more miscarriages than
the wives of servicemen who did not go
there.
Since DU darkened the land Iraq has
seen birth defects which would break
a heart of stone: babies with terribly
foreshortened limbs, with their intestines
outside their bodies, with huge bulging
tumors where their eyes should be, or
with a single eye-like Cyclops, or without
eyes, or without limbs, and even without
heads. Signiicantly, some of the defects
are almost unknown outside textbooks
showing the babies born near A-bomb
test sites in the Paciic.
Doctors report that many women no
longer say ‘Is it a girl or a boy?’ but
simply, ‘Is it normal, doctor?’ Moreover
this terrible legacy will not end. he
genes of their parents may have been
damaged forever, and the damaging DU
dust is ever-present.
Blue on Blue
What the governments of America and
Britain have done to the people of Iraq
they have also done to their own soldiers,
in both wars. And they have done it
knowingly. For the battleields have been
thick with DU and soldiers have had
to enter areas heavily contaminated by
bombing.
Moreover, their bodies have not only
been assaulted by DU but also by a
vaccination regime which violated
normal protocols, experimental vaccines,
nerve agent pills, and organophosphate
pesticides in their tents. Yet, though the
hazards of DU were known, British and
American troops were not warned of its
dangers. Nor were they given thorough
medical checks on their return – even
though identifying a high body burden
of DU quickly might have made it
possible to re move some of it from their
body. hen, when a growing number
became seriously ill, and should have
been sent to experts in radiation damage
and neurotoxins, many were sent to a
psychiatrist.
Over 200,000 US troops who returned
from the 1991 war are now invalided
out with ailments oicially attributed to
service in Iraq – that’s 1 in 3. In contrast,
the British government’s failure to fully
assess the health of returning troops,
or to monitor their health, means no
one even knows how many have died
or become gravely ill since their return.
However, Gulf veterans’ associations say
that, of 40,000 or so ighting it men and
women who saw active service, at least
572 have died prematurely since coming
home and 5000 may be ill. An alarming
number are thought to have taken their
own lives, unable to bear the torment of
the innumerable ailments which have
combined to take away their career, their
sexuality, their ability to have normal
children, and even their ability to breathe
or walk normally. As one veteran puts it,
they are ‘on DU death row, waiting to die’.
Whatever other factors there may be,
some of their illnesses are strikingly
similar to those of Iraqis exposed to DU
dust. For example, soldiers have also
fathered children without eyes. And, in a
group of eight servicemen whose babies
lack eyes seven are known to have been
directly exposed to DU dust.
hey too have fathered children with
stunted arms, and rare abnormalities
classically associated with radiation
damage. hey too seem prone to cancer
and leukaemia. Tellingly, so are EU
soldiers who served as peacekeepers in
the Balkans, where DU was also used.
Indeed their leukaemia rate has been so
high that several EU governments have
protested at the use of DU.
he Vital Evidence
Despite all that evidence of the harm
done by DU, governments on both sides
of the Atlantic have repeatedly claimed
that as it emits only ‘low level’ radiation
DU is harmless.
Award-winning scientist, Dr. Rosalie
Bertell who has led UN medical
commissions, has studied ‘low-level’
radiation for 30 years.(2) She has found
that uranium oxide particles have more
than enough power to harm cells, and
describes their pulses of radiation as
hitting surrounding cells ‘like lashes
of lightning’ again and again in a single
second.2 Like many scientists world wide
who have studied this type of radiation,
she has found that such ‘lightning
strikes’ can damage DNA and cause cell
mutations which lead to cancer.
Moreover, these particles can be taken
up by body luids and travel through the
body, damaging more than one organ. To
compound all that, Dr. Bertell has found
that this particular type of radiation can
cause the body’s communication systems
to break down, leading to malfunctions
in many vital organs of the body and
to many medical problems. A striking
fact, since many veterans of the irst Gulf
war sufer from innumerable, seemingly
unrelated, ailments.
In addition, recent research by Eric
Wright, Professor of Experimental
Haematology at Dundee University, and
others, have shown two ways in which
such radiation can do far more damage
than has been thought. he irst is that a
cell which seems unharmed by radiation
can produce cells with diverse mutations
several cell generations later. (And
mutations are at the root of cancer and
birth defects.) his ‘radiation-induced
genomic instability’ is compounded
by ‘the bystander efect’ by which cells
mutate in unison with others which have
been damaged by radiation – rather as
birds swoop and turn in unison. Put
53
together, these two mechanisms can
greatly increase the damage done by a
single source of radiation, such as a DU
particle. Moreover, it is now clear that
there are marked genetic diferences
in the way individuals respond to
radiation-with some being far more likely
to develop cancer than others. So the
fact that some veterans of the irst Gulf
war seem relatively unharmed by their
exposure to DU in no way proves that
DU did not damage others.
he Price of Truth
hat all this evidence has been ignored
may be no accident. A US report, leaked
in late 1995, allegedly says, ‘he potential
for health efects from DU exposure
is real; however it must be viewed in
perspective... the inancial implications
of long-term disability payments and
healthcare costs would be excessive.’3
Clearly, with hundreds of thousands
gravely ill in Iraq and at least a quarter
of a million UK and US troops seriously
ill, huge disability claims might be made
not only against the governments of
Britain and America – if the harm done
by DU were acknowledged. here might
also be huge claims against companies
making DU weapons and some of
their directors are said to be extremely
close to the White House. How close
they are to Downing Street is a matter
for speculation, but arms sales makes
a considerable contribution to British
trade. So the massive whitewashing of
DU over the past 12 years, and the way
that governments have failed to test
returning troops, seemed to disbelieve
them, and washed their hands of them,
may be purely to save money.
he possibility that inancial consid-
erations have led the governments of
Britain and America to cynically avoid
taking responsibility for the harm they
have done – not only to the people of
Iraq but to their own troops – may seem
outlandish. Yet DU weapons weren’t
used by the other side and no other
explanation its the evidence. For, in the
days before Britain and America irst
used DU in war its hazards were no
secret.4
One American study in 1990 said DU
was ‘linked to cancer when exposures
are internal, [and to] chemical toxicity-
causing kidney damage’. Another study
openly warned that exposure to these
particles under battleield conditions
could lead to cancers of the lung and
Your questions finally
answered:
1. Is it true that really effective cancer treatments
have been developed – and are being suppressed?
2. Is there a way to run your car on water alone –
and if so, who has done it and how did they do it?
hey’re not not just “urban myths”. Over the years, non- from high mileage carburettors, to startling discoveries
toxic, highly efective therapies for cancer, AIDS and NASA doesn’t tell you about Mars and our moon; the
other degenerative diseases have been developed and book reveals the truth behind the vaccine controversy,
successfully tested. as well as archeological cover-ups that could radically
alter our view of the past.
Tragically, many of these therapies have been suppressed
by a vicious medico-pharmaceutical industry that is From Nikola Tesla – the man who gave the world
more interested in proits and market control than in alternating current – to “unknowns” like Dinshah
helping cure illness and alleviate sufering. Galiali – the man who healed with coloured light
– you will ind them in this book. When these people
As for cars that supposedly can run on water, well that’s threatened the supremacy of the elite, their careers came
true, too. Archie Blue, a New to an end.
Zealand inventor, even had
his “water car” tested and FREE BOOK OFFER SUPPRESSED
proved by the UK Royal When you buy a copy of SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS may
Automobile Association in INVENTIONS AND OTHER be the most riveting,
1979. DISCOVERIES at the RRP of $39.95 important and informative
(with this ad), we will send you a a FREE book you will ever buy.
he fact is that devices like COPY of THE CANCER PREVENTION A NZ best seller in both
his have been invented HANDBOOK by Katherine Joyce Smith editions, and a US Book-
(275 pages – a $29.95 value). his book is the
many times over the years, of-the-Month-Club
bible of preventative medicine, and could be
but sadly, each time the a real life-saver for you and your family. selection, this book is the
inventors succeeded in enduring git for everyone
perfecting them, they were who matters in your life.
stopped, and sometimes even killed.

Stories of the suppression of truly signiicant medical

breakthroughs, and super-eicient, non-polluting
inventions, read like iction or “conspiracy theories”. But
they’re not. hey’re “conspiracy facts”.
SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS AND OTHER mail to: The Full Court Press, PO Box 44-128, Pt Chevallier,
DISCOVERIES details many exciting and important
medical and technological breakthroughs which have
been ignored or disparaged by our corporate-run,
establishment media, and suppressed by mainstream
science and industry.
Yes. Please send me my copy of SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS
AND OTHER DISCOVERIES at only $39.95 each (plus $5 p/h),
PLEASE ALSO SEND ME MY FREE COPY OF THE CANCER
PREVENTION HANDBOOK WITH THIS ORDER. (For quantity
discounts, please contact us.) TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED
WITH ORDER: NZ $44.95. (A $69.90 VALUE!). Clip and
Auckland, NZ
Name ...................................................................................
Address ...............................................................................
City/Town..............................................................................

SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS (550 pages, illustrated) Email ...................................................................................

contains more than 50 detailed case studies –ranging

54
bone, kidney damage, non-malignant abolished military hospitals, where particles have been carried high into the
lung disease, neuro-cognitive disorders, there could have been specialised air – again and again and again as the
chromosomal damage and birth research on the efects of DU and where bombs rained down – ready to be swept
defects.5 expertise in treating DU victims could world wide by the winds.
have built up. And, not content with
A Culture of Denial the insult of suggesting the gravely he Royal Society has suggested the
disabling symptoms of Gulf veterans solution is massive decontamination in
In 1996 and 1997 UN Human Rights are imaginary they have refused full Iraq. hat could only scratch the surface.
Tribunals condemned DU weapons pensions to many. For, despite all the For decontamination is hugely expensive
for illegally breaking the Geneva evidence to the contrary, the current and, though it may reduce the risks in
Convention and classed them House of Commons brieing paper some of the worst areas, it cannot fully
as ‘weapons of mass destruction on DU hazards says ‘it is judged that remove them. For DU is too widespread
incompatible with international any radiation efects from possible on land and water. How do you clean up
humanitarian and human every nook and cranny of
a city the size of Baghdad?
rights law’. Since then, ‘he [US government’s] Veterans How can they decontaminate
following leukaemia in
European peacekeeping Administration asked me to lie about the a whole country in which
troops in the Balkans and microscopic particles, which
Afghanistan (where DU was
risks of incorporating depleted uranium cannot be detected with
a normal Geiger counter,
also used), the EU has twice in the human body. Uranium does cause are spread from border to
called for DU weapons to
be banned. cancer, uranium does cause mutation, border? And how can they
clean up all the countries
and uranium does kill. If we continue downwind of Iraq – and,
Yet, far from banning
DU, America and Britain with the irresponsible contamination indeed, the world?
stepped up their denials
of the harm from this
of the biosphere, and denial of the fact Most importantly, though, is
this: how can we make war
radioactive dust as more that human life is endangered by the itself obsolete?
and more troops from the
irst Gulf war and from deadly isotope uranium, then we are
action and peacekeeping doing disservice to ourselves, disservice
in the Balkans and
Afghanistan have become to the truth, disservice to God and to all
seriously ill.
generations who follow.’
his is no coincidence.
In 1997, while citing
experiments by others, in which 84 exposures are extremely unlikely to be References
percent of dogs exposed to inhaled a contributory factor to the illnesses
currently being experienced by some 1. he Lancet volume 351, issue 9103, 28
uranium died of cancer of the lungs, February 1998.
Dr. Asaf Durakovic, then Professor of Gulf war veterans.’ Note how over a
2. Rosalie Bertell’s book Planet Earth the Latest
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at quarter of a million sick and dying US Weapon of War was reviewed in Caduceus issue
Georgetown University in Washington and UK vets are called ‘some’. 51, page 28.
3. www.gullink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabl1.
was quoted as saying: htm#TAB L_Research
he Way Ahead Report Summaries
‘he [US government’s] Veterans 4. www.wagingpeace.org/articles/02.01/
Britain and America not only used DU 020117moret.htm he secret oicial
Administration asked me to lie about the
memorandum to Brigadier General L.R.Groves
risks of incorporating depleted uranium in this year’s Iraq war, they dramatically from Drs Conant, Compton and Urey of
in the human body. Uranium does cause increased its use – from a minimum War Department Manhattan district dated
cancer, uranium does cause mutation, of 320 tons in the previous war to at October 1943 is av ailable at the website www.
minimum of 1500 tons in this one. And mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/Leuren-Moret-Gen-
and uranium does kill. If we continue
Groves21feb03.htm
with the irresponsible contamination this time the use of DU wasn’t limited 5. www.gullink.osd.mil/du_iitab11.htm#tab
of the biosphere, and denial of the fact to anti-tank weapons – as it had largely L_research report summaries
that human life is endangered by the been in the previous Gulf war – but was
deadly isotope uranium, then we are extended to the guided missiles, large Further information
bunker busters and big 2000-pound he Low Level Radiation Campaign hopes to be
doing disservice to ourselves, disservice
able to arrange a limited number of private urine
to the truth, disservice to God and to all bombs used in Iraq’s cities. tests for those returning from the latest Gulf war.
generations who follow.’ It can be contacted at: he Knoll, Montpelier
his means that Iraq’s cities have been Park, Llandrindod Wells, LD1 5LW. 01597
blanketed in lethal particles – any one 824771. Web: www.llrc.org
his was not what the authorities wanted
to hear and his research was suddenly of which can cause cancer or deform a James Denver writes and broadcasts
blocked. child. In addition, the use of DU in huge internationally on science and
bombs which throw the deadly particles technology.
higher and wider in huge plumes of http://www.coastalpost.com/05/04/09.htm
During 12 years of ever-growing
British whitewash the authorities have smoke means that billions of deadly

55
 What on earth is
going on in the sky?
The truth behind “chemtrails”

By Amy Worthington www.globalresearch.ca

N orth America (as well as New Zealand, Australia, and much of Europe - Ed.)
is now sufering its eighth year of conspicuous and dangerous aerosol and
electromagnetic operations conducted by the U.S. government under the guise
of “national security”. Concerned citizens watch in fear as military aircrat tankers
discolour the skies with toxic chemicals that morph into synthetic clouds.

This is not a “contrail” or “vapour trail” which are formed when the heat of a jet exhaust reacts with
the cold of the upper atmosphere and forms a trail of icy vapour. Contrails quickly disappear, and can
be distinguished from “chemtrails” which can linger for hours, gradually spreading out across the sky.
Contrails are white and don’t discolour the sky; chemtrails often turn a blue sky intoSounds
Marlborough a dirty, hazy,
Image: toxic
Betty Rowe
yellow or multi-hued oily “rainbow” appearance.

56
We continually witness bizarre
meteorological occurrences as powerful
electromagnetic devices manipulate both
the jet stream and individual storm fronts
to create artiicial weather and climatic
conditions. Black operations projects
embedded within these aerosol missions
are documented to sicken and disorient
select populations with biological test
agents and psychotronic mind/mood
control technologies.
Part of what is happening in the
atmosphere above us involves the
Pentagon’s secret space weapons
programme, designed for strategic,
operational and tactical levels of war.
NASA missions will soon be transferred
to Pentagon control.(1)he Air Force
Space Command declares that, in order
to monitor and shape world events, it
must ight intense, decisive wars with
great precision from space.(2)Air Force
Secretary James G. Roche has stated:
“Space capabilities are integrated with,
and afect every link in the kill chain.”(3)
In their quest to remain top dog in the
kill chain, the purveyors of perpetual
war have deliberately dimmed earth’s
life-giving sunlight,(5) and reduced
atmospheric visibility with lung-
clogging particulates and polymers.(6)
his ecological terrorism has severely
compromised public health, according
to thousands of testimonials. Years of
mass appeals to legislators, media and
military oicials for information, and for
cessation of catastrophic atmospheric
degradation, have fallen on deaf
bureaucratic ears. Public awareness of
what befalls us remains as murky as our
skies because those “in the know” are
muzzled by national secrecy laws and
Americans have no authority to challenge
matters of national security. Let to gather
clues, we know this much so far:
1. At least part of the aerosol project has
been dubbed Operation Cloverleaf,(7)
probably due to its multi-faceted
operations, which include: weather
modiication, military communications,
space weapons development, ozone and
global warming research plus biological
weaponry and detection testing.
2. Dumping tons of particulate matter
from aircrat has geo-engineered our
planetary atmosphere into a highly
charged, electrically-conductive plasma
that is useful for military projects.(8) he
air we breathe is laden with asbestos-
sized synthetic ibers and toxic metals,
including barium salts, aluminium, and
reportedly, radioactive thorium.(9) hese
materials act as electrolytes to enhance
conductivity of military radar and radio
waves.(10) Poisonous on par with arsenic
and a proven suppressant of the human
immune system,(11) atmospheric barium
weakens human muscles, including
those of the heart.(12) Inhaled aluminium
goes directly to the brain and medical
specialists conirm that it causes
oxidative stress within brain tissue,
leading to formation of Alzheimer’s like
neuroibrillary tangles.(13) Radioactive
thorium is known to cause leukaemia
and other cancers.(14)
3. Only a small percentage of the
military’s atmospheric modiication
projects are visibly obvious. What we
can’t see is equally dangerous. he
ionosphere, the earth and its inhabitants
are continually bombarded with
high frequency microwaves used to
manipulate the charged atmosphere
for weather modiication, information
gathering and for tectonic (earthquake-
producing) weaponry.(15) Independent
chemtrail researcher Cliford

A glimpse into new death technologies under

construction – contained in legislation proposed
by Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

His unsuccessful Space Preservation Act of 2001 was

intended to ban space deployment of the following:(4)

• electronic, psychotronic • strategic, theater, tactical

and information weaponry or extraterrestrial weapons

• high altitude, ultra-low • chemical, biological,

frequency weapons environmental, climate or
tectonic weapons
• laser weapons
• chemtrails (this item
Satellite Imagery of chemtrail blanketing of
• plasma, electromagnetic, was stricken from a later
sonic and ultrasonic version, suggesting duress) South Eastern United States 2004
weapons

57
Carnicom conirms that we are also
continuously subjected to extremely
low electromagnetic frequencies (ELF)
pulsing at 4 hertz multiples, frequencies
known to profoundly afect human
biological and mental functioning.(16)
4. here is a well-documented biological
component to continuously ongoing
atmospheric studies in which nations
and regions are furtively inoculated
via specially designed delivery systems
with combinations of viruses, bacteria,
fungi, mycoplasma, desiccated blood
cells (reportedly bovine erythrocytes
– Ed) and exotic biological markers in
order to assess human, animal and plant
response.(17)
5. he multi-organisational megalith
perpetrating these bio-chem projects
against humanity includes the US
Department of Defense (DOD) and
its research arm DARPA, plus the
Department of Energy (DOE) with
its huge network of national labs and
universities. Private defence contractors
and pharmaceutical companies are
also heavily involved.(18) Cooperating
governments of other nations and
probably some United Nations agencies
are complicit, since the aerosol projects
are global in scope.
Gross chemical and electromagnetic
pollution is only part of the horriic
realities we endure. he sociopaths
who brazenly pervert skies, climate
and weather for power and proit are
the same madmen who have waged
four limited nuclear wars since 1991.
Radioactive weaponry, declared both
illegal and immoral by the entire civilised
world, has been used by the Pentagon in
Desert Storm, the Balkans campaign and
the on-going occupation-wars against
Afghanistan and Iraq. Few Americans
understand the extent of carnage inlicted
in their name across the planet.
By scientiic deinition, the missiles,
tank penetrators and bunker busting
bombs unleashed against Iraq and
Afghanistan by US and British forces in
the so-called war on terror are nuclear
weapons.(19) Refuse from radioactive
weaponry does not disperse, but remains
in the atmosphere where it remains
organotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic
to all living lesh for 4.5 billion years.
Inhabitants of the Pentagon’s two newly
“liberated” nations are now slowly
dying of radiation and heavy metal
poisoning. Victims of US weaponry used
in Afghanistan have a concentration of
non-depleted uranium isotopes in their
bodies never before seen in civilian
populations.(20) Tons of depleted and
non-depleted uranium contaminating
their land, air, food and water guarantee
their painful demise. Using data
from the United Kingdom Atomic
Energy Authority (UKAEA), nuclear
scientist Leuren Moret calculates that
the estimated 2,500+ tons of depleted
58
uranium used against Iraq in 1991 and
2003 is suicient to cause 25 million new
cancers.(21) Is it a coincidence that the
population of Iraq, according to the CIA,
is 25 million?
he quarter million US and British
ighting forces who have helped the
Pentagon deliver this holocaust also face
inevitable radiological death by slow
burn. Rotated into atomic war zones
since 2001, coalition troops have inhaled
and ingested millions of tiny invisible
ceramic uranium particles which emit
alpha, beta and gamma radiation as they
embed in lungs, kidneys, blood, lymph
and bone.(22) Radiation exposure to a
single internalized U-238 (uranium)
alpha particle is 50 times the allowable
whole body dose for one year under
international standards.(23) As U-238
decays into daughter isotopes, it becomes
ever more radioactive, causing cell
and organ destruction to escalate over
time.(24) Uranium contamination leads
to incapacitating, multi-organ system
disorders identical to illnesses sufered
by thousands of Gulf War I vets. Bodily
luids poisoned with uranium isotopes
sicken spouses and visit upon ofspring a
genetic Armageddon.(25)
Who knows what a disabled and
prematurely dying military population
will mean to future stability and safety of
USA? Yet Senator Chuck Hagel (R- Neb.)
now demands that America provide
more fodder for its atomic battleields
by reinstating the military drat so
that “all of our citizens...bear some
responsibility and pay some price” in
order to “understand the intensity of the
challenges we face.”(26)
Despite disingenuous denials that
biological harm will result from
atomic warfare,(27) the Pentagon knows
full well the gruesome realities of
uranium weaponry by virtue of its own
voluminous studies spanning 60 years.
Pentagon documents conirm that
America’s war establishment knowingly
exposes its own troops to dangerous
levels of radiation.(28) he resulting illness
of those now returning from the war
zones is already making headlines.(29)
Because our military-industrial overlords
brazenly poison the very grunts who
make their war games possible,
we must logically conclude there
is virtually nothing they would
not secretly and sadistically do to
the rest of us. Military oicials lie
as perniciously about chemtrail
operations(30) as they do about
efects of DU weaponry. If people
were to consider the published
science regarding chemtrails and
DU, they would understand that
we are all in mortal jeopardy.
Both the Pentagon’s aerosol
operations and its limited nuclear
wars are deeply interconnected.
We can trace the beginnings
of Operation Cloverleaf right
to the Strangelove brain of
Dr. Edward Teller, “father” of
the hydrogen bomb and proponent of
nuking inhabited coast lines to rearrange
them for economic projects.(31) Before
he died in 2003, Teller was director
emeritus of Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, where plans for nuclear,
biological and directed energy weapons
are crated. In 1997, Teller publicly
outlined his proposal to use aircrat to
scatter in the stratosphere millions of
tons of electrically-conductive metallic
materials, ostensibly to reduce global
warming.(32)
Shortly ater Teller’s presentation,
the public began seeing frenetic
chemtrailing. In 2000, CBS News
admitted that scientists were “looking
at drastic solutions for global warming,
including manipulating the atmosphere
on a massive scale.” CBS conirmed that
the plan to load the air with tiny particles
would “delect enough sunlight to trigger
global cooling.”(33)
Teller estimated that commercial aircrat
could be used to spew these particles
at a cost of US73 cents a kilo.(34) his
gives credence to a report by an airline
manager, forced by a compulsory
non-disclosure agreement to remain
anonymous, that commercial aircrat
have been co-opted to assist the military
in consummating Project Cloverleaf.(35)
A 1991 Hughes aircrat patent conirms
that sunscreen particulate materials
can be run through jet engines.(36) A
science textbook now used in some
public schools discusses the sunscreen
project by showing a large orange-red jet
with the caption, “Jet engines running
on richer fuel would add particles to
the atmosphere to create a sunscreen.”
he logo on the plane says “Particle
Air.”(37) he implications of this crucial
information should not be understated. A
We can trace the beginnings
of Operation Cloverleaf
right to the Strangelove
brain of Dr. Edward Teller,
father of the hydrogen
bomb and proponent of
nuking inhabited coast
lines to rearrange them for
economic projects.
programme to make America’s millions
of annual jet lights a source of specially
designed particulate pollution is serious
business.
Cloverleaf particles and polymers
saturating the air we breathe are
smaller than 10 microns (PM 10) and
are invisible to the human eye. By
comparison, a human hair is 60 to 100
microns in thickness. Scientists and
the EPA report that because PM10
and sub-micron pollution particles
bypass lung ilters and enter the blood
stream, they cause radical changes in
the endocrine and nervous systems. (38)
hey can trigger high blood pressure
and cause heart attack within two hours
of inhalation.(39) hey cause the blood
to become sticky, making it tougher for
the heart to pump and increasing the
risk of blood clots and vessel damage.
(40) Now researchers in Taiwan
document “a signiicant increase” in the
59
number of stroke victims when PM10
pollutant levels rise.(41) he American
Lung Association conirms that we are
breathing more toxic air than ever.(42) No
wonder nationwide asthma rates have
been soaring in recent years.(43)
Tiny synthetic ilaments called polymers
are part of the brew. In 1990, a NATO
report detailed how high-lying aircrat
can modify the atmosphere by spraying
polymers to absorb electromagnetic
radiation.(44) US Patent number 6315213
describes how cross-linked aqueous
polymers dispersed into a storm diminish
rain.(45)
Polymer chemist Dr. R. Michael Castle
has studied atmospheric polymers for
years. He has found that some of them
contain bioactive materials, which can
cause “serious skin lesions and
diseases when absorbed into
the skin.”(46) He has identiied
microscopic polymers comprised
of genetically-engineered fungal
forms mutated with viruses. He
says that trillions of fusarium
(fungus)/virus mutated spores,
which secrete a powerful mico-
toxin, are now part of the air we
breathe.(47) Allergies anyone?
We can safely bet that into
our particle-enriched air,
experimenters are also dumping
nanoparticles, developed for a
variety of military and industrial
uses. hese engineered carbon
molecules, as small as one-
thousandth the diameter of
human hair, display bizarre
chemical properties and are known
to trigger organ damage.(48) A recent
study at Southern Methodist University
found that ish exposed to one type
of nanoparticle sufered severe brain
damage ater only 48 hours.(49)
he US military’s aerosol operations
have been climate-altering to the
extreme. Air traic is a huge source
of greenhouse pollution. Increasing
that traic exponentially in order to
scatter tons of heat-trapping metallic
particulates and heat-liberating barium
salts have undoubtedly led to accelerated
global warming. Greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere, including carbon dioxide,
have reached a record high this year.(50) As
carbon dioxide levels rise, oxygen levels
decrease.
In 1996, Scientists for Global
Responsibility compiled a report
contending that dangerous geo- funding and groomed by US military and document also states that the military’s
engineering, as proposed by Teller corporate advisors to play useful roles as radical weather modiication agenda will
and the Global Change Research Co- “enemies.”(54) Former German Technology “become a part of national security policy
ordination Oice, would be absolutely Minister Andreas von Bulow recently with both domestic and international
inefective in mitigating global warming. conirmed on US radio that hijacked applications.”(58)
he report noted that climate engineering planes were able to ly around the eastern
research is funded by industry with US on 9/11 unimpeded by military Weather weapons are now routinely
a vested interest in continued high interdiction because those attacks were used in war zones. A citizen reporting
consumption of fossil fuels.(51) he hair- part of a carefully-orchestrated “covert from Serbia noted that during NATO
brained scheme of particle engineering operation” designed to coerce America operations in the Balkans, black clouds
was contrived to ensure that industry into perpetual conlict with the Muslim suddenly materialised out of blue skies,
polluters will never be forced to decrease world.(55) hailstones were the size of eggs, and
their greenhouse gas emissions. But surreal thunder and lightening terriied
because warming and pollution trends Now, a “secret” Pentagon report has the people. He reported that scientists
have worsened drastically since the been conveniently leaked to the media. found that the electromagnetic ield over
aerosol projects began, we must suspect It contends that abrupt climate change Serbia had been punctured, causing rain
that the warming mitigation program is the most fearful hobgoblin yet.(56) systems to circumvent the region.(59)
is a hoax and that chemtrailing is really Authored by change agents with ties In addition to manufactured drought,
intended, among other things, to create a to the CIA and the Royal Dutch/Shell scientists also predict that Serbia will
series of “hobgoblins.” Group, the report contends that abrupt sufer 10,000 cancer deaths from DU
weaponry used there.(60)
he establishment’s modus
operandi for maintaining a
ierce and lucrative hold upon
Their stumbling block is a According to University of Ottawa
Professor Michael Chossudovsky,
the collective American mind numbing belief that “their” the military’s High-frequency
has been deined precisely by Active Auroral Research
satirist H.L. Mencken (1880- own oficials would never Program (HAARP), operating
1956) who wrote: “he whole
aim of practical politics is to perpetrate dangerous in Alaska as part of the Strategic
Defense Initiative, is a powerful
keep the populace alarmed,
and thus clamorous to be led to
experimentation on humanity tool for weather and climate
modiication.(61)
safety, by menacing it with an
endless series of hobgoblins, all
since “they have families Operated jointly by the US Navy
of them imaginary.” too.” History and the release and Air Force, HAARP antennas
bombard and heat the ionosphere,
In he Report from Iron of declassiied government causing electromagnetic
Mountain published in 1967,
just as the Pentagon’s lucrative documents disprove frequencies to bounce back to
earth, penetrating everything living
Vietnam War was being revved
into high gear, establishment
such naiveté. and dead.(62)

“braintrusters” conirmed that HAARP transmissions make holes

perpetual war is absolutely vital
for controlling and manipulating the
masses. he document even suggested
a number of options for creating
ictitious enemies, noting that perpetual
war induces populations to give blind
allegiance to political authority.(52)
Since the 1930s, when the Eastern
Establishment, including the Bush
family, used its New York banks and
oil companies to secretly fund Hitler’s
German Nazi party,(53) our controllers
have employed FEAR, the concept
of ENEMY and WAR to keep us in
bondage. Chemtrailing is a manifestation
of the Fourth Reich, an era of corporate
fascism ushered in by a powerful military
juggernaut, which manufactures enemies
and unleashes fake terror attacks to scare
us into voiceless submission.
Both Saddam Hussein and the al Queda
networks have long been nourished
with US government and corporate
climate change will lead to a global
catastrophe of monumental proportions,
including nuclear war and natural
disasters, as whole nations disappear
beneath the encroaching sea and
survivors ight for dwindling food, water
and energy supplies.
Yet the Pentagon has been involved for
decades in the drastic manipulation
of weather, climate and atmospheric
conditions. he US used a chemical
agent dubbed Olive Oil during Operation
Popeye to induce heavy rains in Vietnam
40 years ago.(57) he Air Force document
titled “Weather As a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather by 2025” lists its
weaponised agenda for creating abrupt
climate change including: Storm creation
and modiication, fog and cloud creation,
precipitation enhancement, precipitation
denial, drought inducement and
artiicial creation of “space weather.” his
in the ozone,(63) creating yet
another hobgoblin. HAARP inventor
Bernard Eastlund described in his
original patent how antenna energy
can interact with plumes of atmospheric
particles, used as a lens or focusing device,
to modify weather.(64) HAARP is capable
of triggering loods, droughts and
hurricanes, much to the chagrin of both
the European Parliament and the Russian
Duma.(65)
HAARP also generates sweeping pulses
through the ULF/ELF range.(66) In 2000,
independent researchers monitored
HAARP transmissions of 14 hertz. hey
found that when these signals were
broadcast at high output levels, wind
speeds topped 116 kph. hey watched
as these same transmissions dispersed
a huge weather front approaching the
west coast from California to British
Columbia. Although precipitation had
been originally forecast, the front was

60
 In this picture (taken over marlborough Sounds, nZ) two chemtrails
have been laid down. The irst has been dissipating and appears as a
wavy cloud next to the newer chemtrail.
seen shredding apart on satellite photos
and rain did not materialize.(67) he
hobgoblin drought can be an enriching
and empowering tool for certain
corporate and governing entities.
HAARP is not only capable of
destabilising agricultural and ecological
systems anywhere on the planet, but
its efects can target select regions to
afect human physical, mental and
emotional responses during non-lethal
warfare projects.(68) HAARP frequencies
beamed at speciic targets can generate
catastrophic earthquakes,(69) exactly
like the quake last December which
killed thousands of people in Iran, a
nemesis nation according to the Bush
administration (and tsunamis? - ed.).
he Pentagon’s warning about climate
catastrophe is surely nothing more
than a thinly-veiled attempt to prepare
the masses for the bizarre atmospheric
upheavals we can expect as the military
continues to brutalise our planet and
near space with its grotesque toys. And
we ain’t seen nothing yet. Dr. Eastlund
and his ilk have developed plans for solar
powered satellites designed to modify
the weather with electromagnetic beam
output that dwarfs the present HAARP
system.(70) As abrupt climate change is
increasingly orchestrated, we will surely
need additional fascist agencies, an
ever-growing military budget and more
poison-particle projects that just happen
to ensure population reduction as a side
beneit.
Despite visual evidence that every aspect
of our physical environment is being
manipulated and damaged for war
games, many Americans still cannot
accept that dangerous covert operations
are being conducted by a government
they still believe to be a virtuous
defender of freedom. heir stumbling
block is a numbing belief that “their”
own oicials would never perpetrate
dangerous experimentation on
humanity since “they have families too.”
History and the release of declassiied
government documents disprove such
naiveté.
Although “they” had families too,
the US government and its defence
contractors exposed citizens of the
Northwest US to huge and deliberate
releases of radioactive iodine 131 from
the Hanford Nuclear Reservation where
plutonium was produced for nuclear
bombs.71 hose Cold War releases
unleashed radiation illnesses upon
thousands of people downwind, some
of whom received up to 350 rads of
radiation when a maximum safety dose
is set at .025 rads annually.(72) Between
1949 and 1952, radioactive pellets, dust
61
and particles were tested on the hapless
citizens of Utah and New Mexico.(73)
By 1963, 1,200 nuclear weapons tests
conducted at the Nevada test site had
exposed every person in the US to
deadly radioactive fallout, causing
millions of foetal deaths, spontaneous
abortions, stillbirths and birth defects.(74)
he US government also conducted
over 4,000 radiation experiments
on individual human test subjects
without their informed consent.(75) he
delayed efects of decades of radiation
exposure from weapons testing are
today demonstrated by a US population
plagued with epidemic cancer and
heart disease, neurological disorders,
low fertility, chronic fatigue, obesity
(thyroid involvement), immune system
dysfunction and learning disabilities.
Approximately half of all pregnancies
in the US result in prenatal or postnatal
death or an otherwise less than healthy
baby.(76) As military tankers spew white
chemical plumes across America at a
cost of $3,448 per hour per tanker,(77) we
are reminded of Dr. Leonard Cole’s 1994
testimony before a Senate Committee
regarding 45 years of open air testing
during which military aircrat
sprayed American cities with bacteria,
fungus and carcinogenic chemicals.(78)
Between 1962-1973, the US Navy
conducted hundreds of bio-chem tests
known as Operation SHAD (Shipboard
Hazard and Defense). SHAD projects
like Autumn Gold and Copper Head
exposed 10,000 navy personnel to
aircrat spray laden with biological and
chemical warfare agents, including
sarin nerve gas.(79) he cocktails used in
those genocidal “tests” are now linked to
cancer, heart and lung problems sufered
by surviving human guinea pigs.
We are told that defence oicials
perpetrated these atrocities so that
scientists could learn about how to
“protect” Americans from attack. So why,
in the late 80s, would our “protectors”
fall all over themselves to supply
Saddam Hussein’s war machine with 90
shipments of chemical and biological
weaponry, including sarin, anthrax,
botulism, brucella and West Nile
Virus?(80)
It will likely be years before Americans
are told what is being tested upon them
during our present chemtrail/space
wars era. he Hanford people living
down wind of the nuclear “experiment”
did not learn until 1986 what had been
unleashed upon them some 30 years
earlier; SHAD victims iled suit in 2003
to learn the extent to which they were
intentionally exposed to dangerous
substances in the 60s.
To understand how the US has arrived
at this doomsday corruption, we must
recall that immediately ater WWII
ended, the US government initiated
Operation Paperclip through which a
large number of German Nazi scientists
were imported to the United States.
Once issued new identities, these
death industry pros were employed
in US military laboratories to develop
a dazzling array of secret weaponry
projects.(81) With congressional funding,
the crowning achievement of this
nexus was the creation of ghastly new
bioweapons, including the AIDS virus
(82)
and an incapacitating chronic fatigue
agent engineered from mycoplasma and
brucella. (83)
he military is empowered to continue
lethal experimentation by devious
wording of Section 1520a Chapter 32
of US Code Title 50. he law states that
the Secretary of Defence may NOT
conduct any chemical or biological test
or experiment on civilian populations,
unless such tests are for medical,
therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural,
industrial purposes or for research in
general or for protection against weapons
or for law enforcement purposes, including
riot control. So DOD may not use us for
guinea pigs, unless it is for any “good”
reason under the sun! he law also states
that human subjects must give informed
consent. However, a nasty loophole
in Section 1515 of Chapter 32 allows
informed consent to be suspended
by executive order during a period of
national emergency, a situation under
which this nation perpetually labours by
deliberate hobgoblin design.
Few American test rats realise that the
Pentagon’s boys in Congress have now:
• appropriated millions of dollars for the
manufacture and testing of new “mini
nukes” and bunker buster bombs.(84)
• authorised the DOE to resume nuclear
testing in Nevada.(85)
• exempted DOD and DOE from
landmark environmental laws in the
development of these new weapons.(86)
America’s 70,000 nuclear weapons
manufactured since 1945 apparently
are not suicient! As DOE gears up
to develop and test fourth-generation
nukes, numerous reports continue
to surface about the agency’s sordid
corruption and mismanagement. DOE’s
habitual cover-up of site contamination
and its devious eforts to downplay
serious illnesses sufered by many of
its nuclear workers are among recent
scandals.(87)
When new “low yield” nuclear
weapons (deined as being smaller
than 5 kilotons) are tested in Nevada,
downwinders might like to know that a
mini .5 kiloton nuclear warhead would
have to burrow 150 feet to eliminate
atmospheric fallout. No weapon yet
developed can penetrate more than
40 feet into the earth. A tested nuclear
warhead that burrows to only 40 feet will
throw a million cubic feet of radioactive
debris into the atmosphere. (88)
he Pentagon’s new nuke era is in the
capable hands of Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld, who has so ably
presided over the pre-emptive nuclear
incineration of Middle Eastern Muslims.
Rumsfeld has never adequately explained
why his Department was unable to
defend the Pentagon building despite a
full hour’s notice that hijacked planes
were in the air.
62
Working closely with Rumsfeld is a
coven of pro-nukers, including his
advisor Keith Payne, a vocal advocate
of pre-emptive nuclear war. Payne has
written that an “intelligent” nuclear
ofensive launched by the US would
result in “only” 20 million US casualties,
“a level compatible with national survival
and recovery.”(89)
Now that we have tied together the
historical and political realities for
which we mindlessly wave our lags,
we still hope that suicient numbers
of American lab rats will miraculously
awaken from their collective stupor
and take stock of our appalling
situation. Ater all, rodents have a
notoriously short life span and are
always killed when no longer useful to
those conducting research. he irony
of this horror story is that we rats are
being plundered to inance our own
demise. Our national debt of $7.2
trillion grows by $1.8 billion a day.(90)
he Pentagon cannot account for $2.3
trillion of its shadowy transactions.(91)
he radioactive operations in Iraq are
costing $3.7 billion a month, those in
Afghanistan $900 million a month.(92)
No one knows how many $billions are
being lushed into Operation Cloverleaf
and other hobgoblin projects. he US
spends $11,000 per second on weapons,
according to calculations of celebrated
author William homas.(93)
So, while we await the great awakening,
have a wonderful, barium-dried
summer under a synthetic tarpaulin
of aluminium-white, particle-laden,
electrically-charged aviation scum
that passes for sky. Endure well your
respiratory and ocular diiculties
while staring at huge oily sun rings and
smeary sundogs, the patent signature of
chemical assault. Don’t forget to salute
and click your heels when you see tanker
formations patriotically saturating the
atmosphere with such a dense, micro-
particulate brew that they cast black
shadows alongside or ahead of
themselves.
As you witness the noxious drama in the
skies, remember, it’s all just part of the
“kill chain.”
Sources, notes and references available online
www.uncensored.net.nz
airline mechanic
blows the whistle
Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author May 22, 2000

For reasons you will understand as you
read this, I can not divulge my identity.
I am an aircrat mechanic for a major
airline. I work at one of our maintenance
bases located at a large airport. I have
discovered some information that I think
you will ind important.
First, I should tell you something about
the "pecking order" among mechanics. It
is important to my story and to the cause
to which you have dedicated yourself.
Mechanics want to work on three things.
he avionics, the engines, or the light
controls. he mechanics who work on
these systems are considered at the top of
the "pecking order".
Next come the mechanics who work
on the hydraulics and air conditioning
systems. hen come the ones who work
on the galley and other non-essential
systems. But at the very bottom of the list
are the mechanics that work on the waste
disposal systems.
No mechanic wants to work on the
pumps, tanks, and pipes that are used to
store the waste from the lavatories. But
at every airport where I have worked
there are always 2 or 3 mechanics
that volunteer to work on the lavatory
systems.
airline has a maintenance base, they will
ix our plane.
One day last month I was called out from
our base to work on a plane for another
airline. When I got the call the dispatcher
did not know what the problem was.
When I got to the plane I found out
that the problem was in waste disposal
system. here was nothing for me to do
but to crawl in and ix the problem.
When I got into the bay I realised that
something was not right. here were
more tanks, pumps, and pipes than
should have been there. At irst I assumed
that the waste disposal system had been
changed. It had been about 10 years since
I had worked on this particular model of
aircrat.
As I tried to ind the problem I quickly
realised the extra piping and tanks were
not connected to the waste disposal
system, at all. I had just discovered
this when another mechanic from my
company showed up. It was one of the
mechanics who usually works on this
particular type of plane, and I happily
turned the job over to him.
As I was leaving I asked him about the
extra equipment. He told me to "worry
about my end of the plane and let him
worry about his end!"
he next day I was on the company
computer to look up a wiring schematic.
While I was there I decided to look up
the extra equipment I had found. To
my amazement the manuals did not
show any of the extra equipment I had
seen with my own eyes the day before.
I even tied in to the manufacturer iles
and still found nothing. Now I was
really determined to ind out what that
equipment did.
he next week we had three of our
planes in our main hanger for periodic
inspection. here are mechanics crawling
all over a plane during these inspections.
I had just inished my shit and I decided
to have a look at the waste system on one
of our planes. With all the mechanics
around I igured that no one would
notice an extra one on the plane.
Sure enough, the plane I chose had the
extra equipment! I began to trace the
system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I
found what appeared to be the control

he other mechanics are happy to let

them do it. Because of this you will
have only 2 or 3 mechanics that work
on these systems at any one airport. No
one pays much attention to these guys
and no mechanic socialises with another
mechanic who only works on the waste
systems.

Fact is, I had never even thought much

about this situation until last month.
Like most airlines we have reciprocal
agreements with the other airlines that ly
into this airport. If they have a problem
with a plane one of our mechanics will
take care of it.

Likewise, if one of our planes has a

problem at an airport where the other

63
 he next couple of days were very loor. As my mind raced, it was at this
busy and I had no time to continue my moment that I made the connection that
investigation. Late one aternoon, two what had happened to me must have
days ater my discovery, I was called to been directly connected to my tracing the
replace an engine temperature sensor "mysterious" piping.
on a plane due to take of in two hours.
I inished the job and turned in the he next morning the General Manager
paperwork. called me. He said that due to my past
excellent employment record that the
About 30 minutes later I was paged to suspension had been reduced to one day
see the General Manager. When I went and that I should report back to work
into his oice I found that our union rep immediately. he only thing I could think
and two others whom I did not know of was "what are they trying to hide" and
were waiting for me. He told me that a "who are 'THEY'"!
serious problem had been discovered.
unit for the system. It was a standard
He said that I was being written up hat day at work went by as if nothing
looking avionics control box but it had
and suspended for turning in false had happened. None of the other
no markings of any kind.
paperwork. mechanics mentioned the suspension
and my union rep told me not to talk
I could trace the control wires from the
He handed me a disciplinary form stating about it. hat night I logged onto the
box to the pumps and valves but there
that I had turned in false paperwork Internet to try to ind some answers.
were no control circuits coming into the
on the engine temperature sensor I had
unit. he only wires coming into the unit
installed a few hours before. I was loored I don't remember now how I got there
was a power connection to the aircrat's
and began to protest. I told them that this but I came across a site that talked about
main power bus.
was ridiculous and that I had done this chemically-laced contrails.
work.
he system had 1 large tank and 2 smaller
hat's when it all came together. But
tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped
he union rep spoke up at this point and the next morning at work I found a
compartment, but it looked like the large
recommended that we take a look at the note inside my locked locker. It said,
tank could hold about 50 gallons. he
plane to see if we could straighten it all "Curiosity killed the cat. Don't be looking
tanks were connected to a ill and drain
out. I then asked who the other two men at Internet sites that are no concern of
valve that passed through the fuselage
were. he GM told me that they were yours."
just behind the drain valve for the waste
airline safety inspectors but would not
system.
give me their names. Well that's it. Now I know 'THEY' are
watching me.
When I had a chance to look for this
We proceeded to the plane, which should
connection under the plane I found it
have been in the air but was parked on While I don't know what THEY are
cunningly hidden behind a panel under
our maintenance ramp. We opened the spraying, I can tell you how they are
the panel used to access the waste drain.
engine cowling and the union rep pulled doing it. I igure they are using the
the sensor. He checked the serial number "honey trucks". hese are the trucks that
I began to trace the piping from the
and told everyone that it was the old empty the waste from the lavatory waste
pumps. hese pipes lead to a network
instrument. We then went to the parts tanks.
of small pipes that ended in the trailing
bay and went back into the racks.
edges of the wings and horizontal
he airports usually contract out this job
stabilizers.
he union rep checked my report and and nobody goes near these trucks. Who
pulled from the rack a sealed box. He wants to stand next a truck full of shit.
If you look closely at the wings of a large
opened the box and pulled out the While these guys are emptying the waste
airplane you will see a set of wires, about
engine temperature sensor with the serial tanks, it makes sense that they could
the size of your inger, extending from
number of the one I had installed. I was easily be illing the tanks of the spray
the trailing edge of the wing surfaces.
told that I was suspended for a week system.
hese are the static discharge wicks. hey
without pay and to leave immediately.
are used to dissipate the static electric
hey know the plane’s light path so they
charge that builds up on a plane in light.
I sat at home the irst day of my probably program the control unit to
suspension wondering what the hell had start spraying some amount of time ater
I discovered that the pipes from this
happened to me. hat evening I received the plane reaches a certain altitude. he
mystery system lead to every 1 out of
a phone call. he voice told me "Now you spray nozzles in the fake static wicks are
3 of these static discharge wicks. hese
know what happens to mechanics who so small that no one in the plane would
wicks had been "hollowed out" to allow
poke around in things they shouldn't. see a thing.
whatever lows through these pipes to be
he next time you start working on
discharged through the fake wicks.
systems that are no concern of yours you God help us all.
will lose your job! As it is, I'm feeling
It was while I was on the wing that one of – A concerned citizen
generous, I believe that you'll be able to
the managers spotted me. He ordered me
go back to work soon." CLICK.
out of the hanger telling me that my shit
was over and I had not been authorised
Again, I had to pick myself from of the
any overtime.

64
How they’re making you think
that chemtrails are normal
by marjorie Tietjen
daystar1952@yahoo.com
Several days ago, I was speaking with a
customer in my store who happened to
mention that he was in the Air Force.
Needless to say, that piqued my interest.
I asked him what he knew about the
current jet aerosol operation. I briely
described what I was referring to and I
could sense that he knew exactly what
I was talking about. I brought up the
possibility of the chemtrails being used
as some sort of sunscreen. He replied in
a very sincere manner, "Well, you know
that we are having problems with too
much of the sun's radiation entering our
atmosphere."
Whatever the purpose is of this covert
operation, it seems as if it is intended to
last for quite a while, if not indeinitely.
he reason I am currently coming
to this conclusion has to do with the
intense subliminal messages being put
forth by the media. If this Jet Aerosol
Operation were temporary there would
be no need for the extensive mind
control or conditioning tactics we are
witnessing. I have noticed that ABC
(American Broadcasting Company)
seems to be the most obvious ofender.
I have complained several times to the
manager of our local ABC ailiate, that
the weather graphics have changed in
accordance with the condition of our
skies. I brought to her attention the fact
that the 8 day weather planner depicts
smeary chemtrail like backgrounds every
single day of the week and that this had
been taking place for at least half a year. I
mentioned to her that the message these
graphics are portraying is that we never
have any more normal blue sky days. She
seemed sincerely ignorant of the whole
ruse and I also think that she thought
that I might be a little bit "of balance".
I asked who helped their station decide
what graphics to use. I believe the
correct initials were AWS (Associated
Weather Service?). I contacted them
but could only get connected with a
branch that educates school children
about the weather. It's been perhaps half
a year now since I've spoken to ABC
concerning this matter. he weather
graphics have since changed back to
the original blue sky background with
clouds, rain or sun superimposed on a
dark blue background.
However, the chemtrail subliminals have
now become much more pervasive and
are being displayed on the news and
even on the evening game shows. Last
night and every night the ABC evening
news shows blatant chemtrails on a blue
background directly behind the anchor
people. Ater the news I thought I was
going to enjoy Jeopardy but I was so
distracted by the chemtrails and smeary
cloudlike formations in the blue squares
behind the contestants that I couldn't
concentrate on the show.
Wheel of Fortune followed Jeopardy. At
least this show used some imagination
and portrayed the chemtrail streaks as
moving around in a kind of spotlight
fashion. At this point I had had enough.
Other TV programmes may also be
involved in this deceptive conditioning
technique but I don't watch enough TV
anymore to be able to say.
I think we need to ask ourselves which
chemtrail scenerios would require an
indeinite application and as a result
beneit from this type of subliminal
conditioning?
65
When I try to inform friends and
strangers about the chemtrail issue and
how its purpose is being kept secret from
us, most respond with the comment that
if the chemtrail operation is for real, it is
most likely “for our own good” and the
government must be keeping its purpose
secret so as “not to alarm or panic the
people”.
hat explanation doesn't quite make
sense to me, either. In fact the media's/
government's specialty seems to be
aimed at creating constant panic and a
sense of insecurity for the purpose of
manipulating the masses.
So, what's the answer to all this? Is it
better to live in ignorance especially if it
seems as though there is nothing we can
do to change the situation? If the Aerosol
Programme is solely for our beneit, then
I would think that informing the public
would be the most productive path to
take. he answers which will beneit us
all are out there, but in order to access
them we need to work together, pool our
resources and share our insights. How
can we do this if most of the population
is kept in the dark? he only reason that
I can see for keeping us from the truth
of this issue is if there are nefarious pur-
poses behind this massive programme.
 Chemtrail Chemical
Cocktail
By Holly Deyo
here are few issues today that have
sparked the controversy inspired by
chemtrails. It's a near-global event.
It appears there are two types of spraying
which would help account for several
perceived scenarios. For those for whom
this information is relatively new,
here are some basic generalisations.
1. Chemtrails, as opposed to contrails,
take three or more hours to dissipate.
Regular contrails disappear in about 20
minutes.
2. Chemtrails tend to look lat.
3. Another feature diferent from
ordinary contrails is that mature
chemtrails display a vertical curtain of
fall-of.
4. Intense chemtrail spraying is done in
tic-tac-toe, "X" and grids patterns.
5. Spraying is generally done by these
planes: KC-10A, KC-135 (707) and C-
130 for the high altitude spraying and
C-130 turboprop aircrat for the low-
level spraying. he KC-10A is a three-
engine aircrat and would normally
leave three parallel contrails in its wake.
he KC-135 is a smaller, four-engine
aircrat that would typically display four
parallel contrail lines. When used during
chemtrail missions; however, these
aircrat lay down only a single, thick,
billowy chemtrail while simultaneously
displaying no normal contrails. here are
other planes which have been used in the
spraying, but these are the main ones.
6. Two types of spraying are done: high
altitude meaning 20,000 feet and above
and low altitude spraying each with
seemingly diferent purposes.
7. Low level spraying contains molds and
fungi and produces varying symptoms
including: • headaches worse than
migraines • heartburn • heart conditions
• heart arrest, on the rare occasion
• lu-like symptoms • extreme fatigue
• diarrhea • pain and swelling of muscles
and joints • dizziness • nausea • stif neck
• nagging sore throat • general malaise
8. Symptoms last up to three months and
beyond, not typical of lu.
9. Symptoms are not readily treatable by
known antibiotics.
10. Chemtrail missions tend to be
suspended when the ground wind speed
reaches or exceeds 33 kph.
11. Radically afects the health of the
elderly, the very young, and those with
poor immune systems.
12. Ater spraying, gelatinous material
may be seen coming from low-lying,
multi-engine aircrat. Cobweb-like
material from higher-altitude spraying
has been analysed in university
government-licensed labs with some of
the pathogens identiied.
13. Countries reporting spraying include
Australia, Canada, England, France,
Germany, Holland, Ireland, Italy, Mexico,
New Zealand, Scotland, Spain and the
United States. NOTE: his spray list does
not include China, Russia nor the Middle
East. he US has reported spraying in
virtually every state and virtually every
major US city including surrounding
suburbs.
WHaT'S In CHEmTRaIlS?
Part of the substances in the chemtrails
have been identiied: a cocktail of
JP8+100 jet fuel, laced with Ethylene
Dibromide (EDB). his chemical
pesticide was banned in 1983 by the
EPA as a deinite carcinogen and
chemical toxin. Exposure to this type of
spraying can include these symptoms:
• respiratory tract problems • severe
infections of the throat and sinuses
• swelling of the lymph glands
• coughing its • shortness of breath
• sinus headaches • general respiratory
66
failure • damage to the heart and liver
• exposure to EDB makes people more
susceptible to other biological agents due
to severe lung irritation
For lack of a better term, "brown goo"
has been used to describe the material
found on exterior walls of buildings and
windshields of automobiles. It's almost
impossible to remove with soap and
water, and has proved to be highly toxic
to anyone coming in contact with it.
Don't touch it, handle it, or attempt to
remove it by yourself.
"Numerous red and white blood cells,
and unidentiied cell types have been
found within the sub-micron iber
sample previously presented and
submitted on Jan. 20, 2000 to Carol M.
Browner, Administrator of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
he cells appear to be of a freeze-dried or
desiccated nature in their original form
within the microscopic ibers."
www.carnicom.com/bio1.htm
"homas has also reported that spraying
samples have been analyzed and have
revealed that many deadly and toxic
pathogens have been found including
Mycoplasma Fermetens Incognitus (the
SAME bioengineered pathogen that
Dr.Garth Nicholson discovered in about
45% of the veterans who came down
with Gulf War Illness). homas found
that Mycoplasma, however, was only
ONE pathogen among a group of highly
toxic biohazard substances analysed
from the chemtrail residues."
www.educate-yourself.org/ctindex.html
CHEmTRaIl CoCKTaIlS
– no THanK You, WE'RE
abSTaInInG
here are at least four or ive components
found in these cocktails as released by
Will homas.
1. A unique chemical marker used to
identify the speciic biological cocktail.
his marker is derived from a coral reef.
2. Samples contain a bacterium,
Pseudomonas Fluorescens, which is
responsible for serious blood infections.
Mr. homas characterizes this organism
as a bacterium that his research has
shown to be named in more than 160
Pentagon patents pertaining to both
biological warfare applications and
aerosol inoculation experiments. It
is also cited in DOD literature as an
experimental biowarfare bacteria.
Additionally, Pseudomonas Fluorescens
is known to attack the respiratory system
and is associated with severe coughing
its, general weakness, and vertigo and is
extremely resistant to most
antibiotics.
3. Some samples contained Pseudomonas
Aeruginosa which invade and attack
the respiratory system. Once infected
by this bacteria, the linings of the lungs
produce a thick mucous which results
in breathing diiculties, coughing its,
and shortness of breath, following
only minor physical exertion. Ater the
infections have taken hold, Aeruginosa
generates a wide range of toxic proteins
which cause extensive tissue damage
and severely compromises the immune
system. It is also associated with
bronchitis, pneumonia, ear and eye
infections, meningitis, muscle and joint
pain, cystic ibrosis, and gastrointestinal
distress. Aeruginosa is also very
antibiotic-resistant.
4. A fungus called streptomyces has
also turned up in these cocktails. his
fungus is normally found inside a
research laboratory since its primary use
is in the production of antibiotics like
Tetracycline and Streptomycin. he non-
lab form of this fungus can cause severe
infections in human beings.
5. he last component discovered in
these cocktails is a special bacillus
which contained what is known as a
DNA restriction enzyme. What this
allows, in efect, is gene splicing. A
scientist can take a speciic length
from a DNA chain and transfer it to
another organism creating a mutation.
his substance is found only in genetic
engineering laboratories. One of its uses
is to create exotic viruses with speciic
characteristics and pathologies.
PRoTECT YouRSElF
First and foremost, if you see chemtrails
go inside. Ditto for pets, if possible.
Second, don't touch the cobweb-like
substances or the "brown goo".
hird, build up your immune system.
Eliminate fatty foods, reined sugar,
white lour, salt, cofee, alcohol, tobacco
and recreational drugs. Drink plenty
of pure water. Take supplements of
vitamins A, C, E and zinc. Echinacea
and Goldenseal have also proved helpful.
Some folks suggest daily doses of
colloidal silver as well as gargling with it.
Don't burn your candle at both ends; get
plenty of sleep.
IF You aRE EXPoSEd
his is not a cure-all, but it may help.
1) Take a hot shower with an
antibacterial soap. Hot water helps kill
bacteria, mold and yeast particles. Be
sure to wash your hair since it's close to
your mouth, nose and eyes (easy access
to your respiratory tract).
2) If you get a severe sore throat or
cough up green phlegm, go to the doctor
immediately. Green phlegm means a
bacterial infection either in the lungs or
in the upper respiratory tract. Bacterial
infections multiply rapidly and can only
be killed by antibiotics and then, they are
not always efective.
aSSESSInG THE
SCEnaRIoS
So what is the purpose for the spraying?
• Weather modiication:
Based on their published agenda,
we know that the US Air Force is
currently engaged in extensive weather
modiication and control techniques.
Experimentation is highly probable
which could account for some of the
sprayings.
"he Air Force also admits to "routine
fuel dumping" of highly toxic JP8,
and to using carbon black for weather
modiication. According to a recent
NASA cloud study, carbon black is a
"very efective" nuclei around which
water vapour can condense, forming
artiicially-induced cloud cover."
http://www.islandnet.com/~wilco/
mysites.html
However, there are many varying
viewpoints. One of the absolute best
commentaries is written by Richard
Malinowski and found here:
http://home.earthlink.net/~wolfmind/
CT01.html
It is detailed and lengthy - at least 169K.
he spraying issue is so pervasive and
potentially harmful, it deserves your
careful research and consideration.
Some other good places to start are listed
below.
hollyd@netconnect.com.au

FuRTHER REadInG Chemtrail Crimes & Cover Ups

www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm
Will Thomas – the investigative journalist from Canada Contrail Connection
who broke the story and its related medical ramiications. www.contrailconnection.com/index.html
www.islandnet.com/~wilco/ ChemTrail Watch
members.xoom.com/centrexnews/chemtrails
Millennium Greetings From The New World Order (or Chemtrails, à la Carte
How I Learned to Love the Chemtrail Bomb) - excellent, www.lacarte.org/health/chemtrails
detailed backgrounder. Sightings Homepage
http://home.earthlink.net/~wolfmind/CT01.html www.sightings.com
and of course: www.rense.com

67
 NEW ZEALAND POLITICS
Is new Zealand really a democracy ... or just an

elected
dictatorship?
an interview with david lange
by Jonathan Eisen

dl Now... you are interested in referenda!

JE I am interested in Binding Citizens’

Initiated Referenda.

dl Just binding ones.

JE he New Zealand 1993 legislation

provides for advisory ref ...

dl Indicative.

JE I have been studying how they have

worked in diferent countries around
the world, especially in Switzerland,
and I’ve concluded that it’s a damn
good idea, especially in that it provides
for some much needed checks and
balances on the executive, something
we don’t apparently have here in New
Zealand.

dl Well, that’s easily said, but it’s not quite

correct. We have a check and balance
on the executive every three years.

JE Yes, but what about in the intervening

three years?

dl You’ve got the right of access to courts

...

JE According to the 1986 Royal

Commission on Electoral Reform,
Binding Referenda are not advisable,
so long as the following three
conditions are met: 1) that the
government holds regular elections;
2) that the government respects the
informed opinion of the electorate;
and 3) that the government respects
the select committee process. As far

68
 as I can tell they have fallen short on numbers two and
three, and I say so in my piece on Geofrey Palmer in the
book.
dl
dl It’s a very hard test to discharge, because you can have
the process and dismiss the outcome. In other words, you
can respect the (select committee) hearings but not take JE
any notice of what they do.
about. Do you believe that ultimately sovereignty rests
with Parliament or with the People?
he people, in the end. However, the process of getting
there is very convoluted.
Can you comment on some of the arguments against
binding referenda?

JE You know what they did recently with the TGA (he dl Many of the arguments against binding referenda are
Australian herapeutic Goods Admininstration – ed). demeaning. hey assume that people always vote for
things which are popular, which carry beneits without
dl No... acknowleding the costs ... hese arguments have been
largely discredited by the experience overseas. People
JE hey were having select committee hearings on that have not behaved like that and they have taken caution
and Annette King decided that she was going to enter and responsibility when they go for the options.
into a treaty with Australia (to “regulate” nutritional
supplements – ed) one day before the select committee here is, however, an argument that is becoming less
was due to report out, against the idea. valid now that politics is becoming less principled.
here was a time when political parties and principles,
dl Well, yes, that’s what I’m saying. You can “respect” the manifestos and mandates meant something more than
select committe process, letting what they mean now. hey had
them talk as long as they like, a conviction that they wanted to
till the cows come home, and achieve, holistic outcomes, global
it’s perfectly within the bounds measures which had a degree
of your power to ignore the
outcome. “It is wrong to of interdependency and were
coherent. And there is an argument

If you’re talking about protecting

the public from excesses, we do
not have the structure in New
Zealand which provides for
believe ... that that Binding CIR can trespass
on the possibility of integrated
people always politically sustainable interactive
developments. If we still had parties
behave selishly. In which had coherent, widescale

fact, I believe that most

touchstones of constitutional political platforms, it would be a
deinition and which provides very compelling argument. hat
absolute bedrock yardsticks
against which the conduct of binding referendum is not the case anymore, and
indeed MMP has made it almost
politics can be judged. We have
a much more luid, evolving,
topics will be of a impossible, so that there is a logic
to having binding referenda in
constantly changing thing selless variety.” conjunction with MMP, because
which in the end depends for both spring from the same sort of
its authority on the three yearly impulse, which is to gain maximum
mandate. Sometimes the excesses democratic traction by giving
of power can be overlooked in the voice to smaller groupings. With
triumphalism of something which is popular at the time the current parliamentary governmental set up the
and therefore sweeps the government back into oice (or implication inevitably is that you’re not going to have a
the opposition into power), so that you cannot with any monolithic government majority; the need now therefore
precision identify the speciic issue on which the mind of is to accomodate the aspirations of smaller “slabs”.
the electorate changed. And therefore, you can’t say that
the government was bad marked because of that. You JE It didn’t happen that way, did it? MMP did not weaken
can actually have governments that get into oice again the power of the parties.
despite public condemnation in respect to one or two
aspects of their administration but public acceptance of dl No, it did, considerably.
the bulk of their administration...
JE Well, one could argue that in the case of the Privy
JE What happens when you get governments re-elected that Council, two minority parties, Labour and the Greens,
ignore every single referendum that has been sent their got together and pushed through a constitutional change
way? in which more than 80% of the people wanted to have a
say on, a referendum.
dl Yes, that’s right, but you have to judge the context, what
the point of those things was, whether or not they were dl Most people didn’t have a clue. Most people in my
really being ignored... electorate think that the Privy Council is a lavatory
board.
JE here is no question but that they were being ignored.
Which brings up the question of sovereignty, which is JE Very funny.
what this whole question of binding referendums is all

69
 to Parliament the Foreign Afairs Select Committee met
dl It’s also very true. twice a year to approve the accounts. It was like being on
holiday. Now it means a lot. hey do exactly this: they
JE But the central point is whether or not two minority invigilate what the government is doing in accepting
parties have the moral right ... international obligations so that they review every damn
treaty that the government enters into and they are
dl I would say that they have a moral duty. catching up on a lot of them. We have a process which
is to be likened to some extent to what they have in the
JE I would argue that if you want to change the constitution United States...
you should go to the people.
JE hat’s unfortunate.
dl You don’t go to the people to change the constitution
because, that’s our constitution. We change our dl ... because you have a situation where the executive needs
constitution without going to the people because our to have the approval of the legislative branch before it
constitution says we do. undertakes to do international terms like free trade. You
don’t have an unimpeded executive mandate in the US
JE When they abolished the Upper House, how did they do and you don’t have one in New Zealand.
that?
JE What you do have, though, is an almost uninterrupted
dl hey voted it out. encroachment on national sovereignty, being steamrolled
by the globalisation engine. And who is pulling the
JE Who did? strings on governments around the world? It could
be convincingly argued that the
dl he government. hey illed multinational corporations are
the Upper House with a lot of irmly in the driver’s seat in the
dummies and then used them all United States, helping to create
to kill themselves. Its only in recent
times that we have introduced “You can ‘respect’ wars, most recently the one on
Iraq, which are designed to directly
the constitutional “cautionary
lags” and Geofrey Palmer had a
the Select beneit the inancial interests of
very indentiiable corporations.
lot to do with that. And we have
also tended to encourage judicial
Committee dl he Reagan presidency was
activism which 25 years ago would process, letting them of course the Bechtel (he Bechtel
have been unheard of. (By the
talk as long as they
corporation, a large multinational
way, I helped stop the abolition involved in construction)
of the Privy Council when I was
Prime Minister, not because I had like till the cows presidency.

any love for the Privy Council but

come home, and it’s JE hat’s right. Reagan’s
because I thought we were going to Secretary of State was Bechtel
give the whole of the South Island
to the Maori.)
perfectly within the president George Schultz.

bounds of your power dl And the George W.

We’ve gone through a lot of change
to ignore the outcome.”
in NZ in the last 25 years. We
have had more judicial activism,
more academically gited people
who have felt the need to become
more protective of institutions and
not lightly to change them, to be cautious in matters of
constitutional change.
JE But where in all of this were the “we, the people”? While
the judges were becoming more activist, and the
politicians more academically gited, governments were
at the same time making treaties all over the place for
which they had no mandate (witness the most recent
one with Australia) while the people were given the
opportunity every three years to change the ruling
parties, which were largely two sides of the same coin.
dl he treaties issue is not unique to New Zealand. It is
happening to all countries. What we have done, though,
is introduce more robust procedures to let the Parliament
invigilate (oversee) the exercise of the power of the
executive in treaty-making procedures. When I irst went
presidency is the Halliburton
presidency.
JE OK, back to the central
question: What part do you
see Binding Citizen’s Initiated
Referenda playing in the reformation of a system that is
running amok around the world. Can it become a brake
on the inluence of the large corporations, for example?
dl Oh, if you had binding referenda on various speciic ad
hoc policy issues, you’d have yourseves a total brake on
the inluence of anyone. However, the beneit of such
a policy is also its detriment. What is so good about it
in terms of thwarting malign, evil, manipulative selish
conduct by external powers, given the sheer power of
the vote, in the reverse is something that can stop people
of good wiill doing the right thing on a planned and
calculated tapestry ...
JE But have you ever heard of Binding Referenda stopping
people of good will?

70

dl No, no. I don’t know. But the argument, at least
theoretically, is that if you have the power to subvert evil,
you also have the power to subvert good, too.
JE Of course, theoretically. However, in practice,
governments around the world that are not responsive dl
to the people have systematically subverted the good for
centuries. Indeed, that is the whole point of the need for
BCIR. he power of the people has been bled away from
them on a systematic basis, except for the voting ritual
they practice every three years. In the US, our vaunted
checks and balances system has been totally subverted, to
the point where nearly every single member of Congress JE
has been bought of.
dl I can’t tell you from looking at our present political
behaviour what would be the probable outcomes of dl
various binding referenda, because we’re in a state of
confusion. We don’t have the power of blatant majority JE
government anymore, and
now we have driting nuances
and shiting coalitions of
opportunism...
thousand signatures for goodness sake – you would
certainly get an informative process. Anyhow, it seems
that when given the chance, the people oten seem to
make much more intelligent decisions than their political
masters do.
Well, you could do it (have BCIR), but you would wind
up creating a new sort of jurisprudence. One of the
problems with it is how in less than sparkling issues, you
would have to nurse the situation to begin with rather
carefully to make sure that you only get quite graphic,
stark questions you’re articulating.
You’re quite right. If we get a year’s time to educate the
people and the budgets are allocated for the debate, let
the chips fall where they might.
here’s no question but that.
No question about what?
dl hat you could do it.
JE Of course we could.

JE Shiting opportunism, yes.

Very good. But there is at least
one instance where you can
pinpoint a probable outcome.
Last year year the polls
indicated that more than 70%
of the New Zealand public did
not want a bar of GE in their
food or environment. In fact,
“Many of the dl And if you failed? ...
arguments against JE hen we’d fail. But here was a
case where Monsanto and others put a
binding referenda lot of money into trying to convert the
are demeaning. They
New Zealand people to the cause of
genetic engineering, and they lost – at
assume that people least in the opinion polls.

what inspired me to do this

always vote for things dl hey lost in the end, too, at
book (People Power) was when least I’m quite sure they will because
I read that Switzerland was
having a binding referendum
which are popular, they won’t want to keep going.

in 2004 on the commercial which carry beneits JE From your mouth to God’s
release of GE, and I thought,
without acknowledging
ear. I hope you’re right, because this
“What’s good enough for is a hideous technology. Here we have
Switzerland is good enough
for New Zealand.” When you the costs... These a government which has ignored
the informed opinion of the people,
have a government that has
been deliberately and willfully
arguments have been acting as the functionaries of the
multinational corporations. What
ignoring and disparaging
the informed opinions of the
largely discredited by the other remedy, other than Binding
Citizens’ Initiated Referenda, can you
citizens of this country, to experience overseas” see for this?
bring in this technology that
can be hideously destructive dl Revolution.
to the human immune system,
for the beneit of the large JE I’m talking about a peaceful
corporations, you have a thing, no shots ired.
government that urgently needs some serious checks
and balances. Now if we had – or have – a binding dl he standard answer that I’ve given. You get your shot
referendum on the commercial release of GE in this every three years.
country, there is no question about the fact that the
people of New Zealand would have rejected it. JE Well, that’s not good enough, is it?

I am confronted with arguments like “the people are not
well enough informed to make intelligent decisions”,
which may well be true where they are poorly informed
or not inclined to inform themselves. But by the very
nature of the referendum process – in order to get a
referendum, you need to collect two or three hundred
dl But you also inherit what has been accomplished in the
preceding three years, which gave you cause to sack
them, so that you don’t wipe of three years of outcomes
because you change the government. You embrace (much
of? – ed.) what the previous government did.

71
JE hat’s exactly why they call it the “loyal opposition”.
Exactly who are they loyal to these days? Who do they
work for?
dl he answer is that at the moment in our system we have
our triennial elections.
JE And that doesn’t seem to be working, does it?
dl he answer is that it isn’t working worse than it ever did.
But that is not to say that it works satisfactorily. I don’t
think that it’s deteriorated. We’re probably doing some
things better than we used to, in constitutional terms, over
the years.
JE OK, so it’s not working any worse than it did over the
years. Nevertheless, here we have just one case, where
the government ignores the very well informed opinion
of the people with possibly grave health, economic
and environmental consequences. If we have to wait
three years down the track
to throw them out, what do
we get? Another government
that will do precisely the same
thing. We don’t want to have
a revolution here, just to have
the needs and the voices of the
people heeded. All we want is a
check on this kind of behaviour.
his is an insane decision that
the government is making. If
the people don’t have binding
referenda that can negate that,
there is nothing that will, is there?
dl No, and you’ve got a dilemma in our constitution. You
can do it (BCIR), but you’ve got to go further. You have to
have a procedure for unentrenching the new constitution.
In other words, if you have a binding referendum
phenomenon in association with a general election, you
would efectively be electing a conditional government, a
government based on the premise that they can’t do X or
Y. It’s not been in New Zealand in our entire experience.
JE I know.
dl I’m not arguing with you. I’m only saying that there’s
a novelty about it – which is not to deny its potential
good. It is a speciic means of easing concern about a
speciic threat to liberty, health or choice. It does require
a considerable degree of public education and awareness.
It is wrong to believe, though, that people always behave
selishly. In fact I believe that most binding referendum
topics will be of a selless variety, probably.
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves,
and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion."
72
JE Selless.
dl Yes, “selless”, rather than selish. And it can be
accomodated within our parliamentary and constitutional
structures. It’s funny, because for me it brings back all the
old arguments in favour of MMP. Everything I ever heard
about it is the same as what I used to hear about why you
have to have MMP. All it shows is that mortal systems can’t
do God’s work.
JE Was it Churchill who said that “the cure for democracy
is more democracy”? It was either Churchill, Lincoln or
Jeferson. hese people said everything. Anyhow, MMP
does not seem to be achieving the desired results, at least
as far as many of its former supporters are concerned.
As Christine Fletcher writes in her piece, it seems to be
making the parties stronger, if anything.
dl You’re very limited in what you can really do in
Parliament, as an ordinary MP. For example you can’t
introduce a bill which requires
a government appropriation or
government expenditure. It’s out
of order. Only a government can
determine what the expenditure of
the government should be. People
(MPs) just don’t realise how limited
their power really is. hey can’t
be constructive or innovative as
some would like to be in procuring
outcomes. hey simply don’t have
the power to make legislation
which commits the government to
expenditure.
JE Having studied BCIR and how it works in other countries,
it seems to raise the spirit of the community when people
realise they don’t have to wait till the next election to get
something done that they want or need doing.
dl It actually takes the heat of the politicians, doesn’t it?
JE here is a tremendous amount of frustration out there,
thousands of people who can see that they are being
ignored, that they simply don’t matter, except when
someone is looking for their vote. he result has to be a bit
of embitterment together with the disappointment, a bit of
depression, anger.
This interview is an excerpt from the book
PEoPlE PoWER: How to make the Government
listen to You, for a Change
edited by Jon Eisen and Steve baron,
Published by The Full Court Press, Po box 44-128, auckland.
Price $14.95 (prepaid)
– homas Jeferson
Where do the NZ parties stand on
“Binding Citizens’ Initiated Referenda”?
D I R E C T D E M O C R A C Y (Leader: Kelvin Alp)
In 2005 Alp formed what may be the irst NZ political party actually organised around the central principle of BCIR
or “Direct Democracy”. A straight-talking “man of the people” Alp’s direct approach, and his in-your-face total
honesty is matched by the fact that he wants to buy back NZ assets sold off by this and previous governments.
Basically environmentally oriented, DD is also going after the MoH for its nefarious connection to the multinational
pharmaceuticals. Website: directdemocracy.net.nz

N Z F I R S T (Leader: Winston Peters)

While Mr Peters has made several public commitments to BCIR, in 2005 he seemed to be moving away from endorsing
the “citizens’ initiated” part of the idea. Nevertheless he was the irst major politician to speak out in favour of Direct
Democracy (2004). There is, of course, the perennial problem of whether or not he really means it. His less than
enthusiastic commitment to the core principles of a civilised, democratic state in condoning the imprisonment and
solitary coninement of Ahmed Zaoui – without any charges ever being laid – render his position seriously suspect.

L A B O U R (Leader: Helen Clark)

Forget it. Power corrupts. Here you have huge majorities of the people not wanting a bar of GE food, or legalised
prostitution, and wanting to keep the Privy Council, etc etc etc, and the Government decides that it knows better than the
people who pay their salaries.

NATIONAL (Leader: Don Brash)

Ditto. The Nats. They still think “democracy” is telling the people what they want. However, Brash has made some noises
about more “referenda” – without the all-important “citizens’ initiated” part.

GREENS (Co-leaders: Jeanette Fitzsimons and Rod Donald)

While every other Green Party of note in the world heartedly endorses BCIR and works to strengthen its provisions
where it exists, the NZ Greens seem to think that real democracy is a right wing conspiracy of some kind, and that “the
corporations” would determine the results of all binding referenda, despite much evidence to the contrary. If power
corrupts, the craving for power may corrupt even more.

UNITED FUTURE (Leader: Peter Dunne)

After much lobbying on the part of Steve Baron, founder of www.votersvoice.org.nz, United Future seemed to be making
some moves to at least “study” the principle. Conclusion: UF will endorse BCIR when hell freezes over, or when they
stop polling altogether.

INDEPENDENTS (Steve Baron)

Baron, founder of www.votersvoice.org.nz, has been the leading exponent of BCIR for many years. He is standing as an
independent in Howick in 2005. He is the co-editor of the book PEOPLE POWER: How to make the government listen to
you, for a change.

PROGRESSIVES (Leader: Jim Anderton)

While Jim Anderton and Matt Robson may be sterling individuals, Anderton simply refuses to “get it” about BCIR.
Apparently they trust the government more than they trust the people to make the right decisions. Example: lowering the
drinking age, something Parliament did in opposition to the will of the people. Now Anderton wants to raise it again.

73
 N E W Z E A L A N D H I S T O RY

he Case for Prehistoric

Civilisations
in New Zealand O O F
P R
By Gary Cook
TH E
For many years a small but dedicated group of archaeologists and researchers have been
exploring one of New Zealand’s most taboo subjects – the question of whether or not
settlements existed in New Zealand prior to the arrival of the “irst canoes” of the Maori. While
thanks in part to their work, the fact that New Zealand was populated prior to the arrival
of Maori settlers has now been well established (despite the reluctance of some people to
acknowledge it), the discovery in 1874 of an ancient carved tree stump is potentially the most
important archeological “anomaly”ever found in this country.

The reason? It could be 150,000 years old.

THERE is a problem with
oicial NZ history.
While orthodox NZ historians continue
to insist that NZ was uninhabited prior
to the arrival of the Maori, at the same
time they acknowledge the fact that
virtually every other important island in
the South Paciic bears lasting evidence of
deeply ancient “megalithic”(carved huge
standing stone) civilisations.
From the famous “Ring Road” of
Rarotonga to the gorgeous megalithic
artefacts on Tonga and the standing
statues of Easter Island – all bear witness
to an advanced civilisation that roamed
the Paciic, established settlements and let
behind not only clues, but monuments.
Orthodox historians still contend,
however, that somehow New Zealand
missed out on these ancient explorations
and settlements and was ignored by these
peoples in their wanderings around the
Paciic – even though megalith evidence
has been found here as well, and veriied
by some of NZ’s most distinguished
scholars of the 19th century. J Macmillan
Brown in his seminal work Maori and
Polynesian remarked on the discovery of
not one but two “Stonehenge” type arrays
here, in Ateamuri (near Lake Taupo) and
the Bay of Islands.Ater a brief moment
or two of national debate, 19th Century
New Zealanders got on with other things,
and these discoveries were subsequently
ignored.
Orthodox NZ historians, like so many
others in so many other disciplines,
have a huge investment in “established”
knowledge, and it is very diicult for actual
facts to overturn a deeply held mindset.
Indeed, one would seriously wonder
how ancient peoples managed to miss a
couple of islands as big as ours, while at
the same time locating and populating
and extensively traveling among many
islands ininitely smaller than NZ all over
the Paciic.
But let us remember, ater all, a long
history of academics selecting only “facts”
and material that it their preconceived
perceptions while ignoring and/or
discarding those which do not it with the
prevailing paradigm of their time.
here is an alternative history of NZ to
the oicial one, and it oten shows up in
material evidence discarded by those who
cannot come to accept the validity of that
material evidence when it is at variance
with their own prior beliefs.
here are many other clues to this
alternative history of ancient New
Zealand and regardless of how they are
ignored, they continue to murmur away
quietly in the corner of our awareness.
Some are found in the myths, legends
and carvings of the Waitaha, in which
we see the history of a nation composed
of 200 Iwi who arrived in NZ in the 2nd
century AD.Note that this settlement
precedes that of the Polynesian Maori Iwi
by 1000 years – this warrior race from the

74
Polynesian islands having arrived during
the years 1250 to 1350 AD.
But most intriguingly, the story of the
Waitaha Nation also contains reference
to other people living in New Zealand
before their arrival.
Were these “Waitaha” legends the only
references to pre-Maori NZ settlements,
we could probably safely ignore them.
However, when coupled with hundreds of
other tantalising examples along the same
lines, we begin to suspect a deliberate
“cleansing” and shaping of history to
satisfy a speciic agenda.
More Evidence Still
For the serious and honest researcher into
pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand,
there is another tantalising piece of
evidence in the little-known canal systems
of the North and South Islands.
I have made measurements from aerial
photographs of a site near the Awanui
River in Northland and estimate that there
are more than 200 km of interconnected
canals or waterways. Measuring 2 metres
across and up to 1.5 metres deep, it is
estimated that more than 25 million
baskets of spoil, weighing out an average
of 40 kilos each, had been moved.
his would be on a scale comparable to the
massive similar excavations accomplished
by the ancient Mayan civilisation in the
Yucatan.
While we are completely unsure how
ancient this canal system is, or who
made it, orthodox NZ archaeologists and
historians are beginning to acknowledge
that there may be something yet to the
pre-Maori “theory”.
• Pollen dating, used efectively as a dating
method overseas, is now used in New
Zealand, and according to an article in
the New Zealand Herald 26th June 1999:
“...Recent analysis of pollen samples
and ash found in peat cores taken from
Motutapu Island, backed by radiocarbon
dating, suggests that deforestation
(attributable to the felling and clearing
by man) occurred there at least as early as
1200 BP. (BP represents before present at
a date set as the year 1950).
his means that perhaps the irst
millennium dawn chorus (of birds)
did have a human audience…he
implications, if these indings are
substantiated, are profound and the
reverberations in the archaeological
ampitheatre are likely to be similar to
those caused by the discovery in the
South Island of bones of the native kiore
(rat) dating to about 2000 BP.”
From the Wellington Dominion 24th July
1999: “Pollen ‘shows early Maori arrival’.”
“Evidence from fossilised pollen suggested
Maori could have arrived in New Zealand
before the time of Christ – up to 2500
years ago – a Massey University expert
said yesterday.
“Massey geographer John Flenley, an
expert in palynology – the use of fossil
pollen to detect human impact – said
there was pollen evidence that would be
at odds with latest indings. (Reference to
the recent dating of Moa bone fragments
by Highman to 700 years.) Vegetation
changes in New Zealand, possible
indications of early human presence,
could place settlements in New Zealand
as far back as 2500 years.”
he headline in the Dominion 23rd July
1999, read: “Humans ‘could have come
and gone’ 2000 years ago.”
“he controversial belief that the irst
people landed in New Zealand about
2000 years ago has been upheld by new
evidence in a paper by Christchurch fossil
researcher Richard Holdaway.
“Dr Holdaway says that the presence of a
population of kiore (native rat) implies a
visit – of whatever duration – by humans
and he stands by his radiocarbon dating
conclusion that rat populations were
established in the North and South
Islands “contemporaneously” at between
75
AD50 and AD150.”
New Zealand Listener 13th April 1951.
“New Zealand Cave drawings in Danger.
– An article on the study of South Island
rock drawings by Dutch artist, heo
Schoon, and the deterioration of sites.”
“...he photographs that he (Schoon) sent
me .... show me that the paintings date for
the most part from before the arrival of
the Maoris – the work perhaps of a Moa
hunting people who were completely
exterminated by the anthropophagous
Maori shortly before the year 1000 of our
era.”
An article, “Legends Tell of Tribes who
Came Before the Fleet”, appeared in the
Auckland Star, 27th September 1957:
“As every schoolboy is supposed to know,
Kupe discovered New Zealand about AD
950, and found it unoccupied.
“Researchers of the caliber of the late Sir
Peter Buck throw doubts on this story that
Kupe found New Zealand unoccupied.
hey have unfolded legends, which assert
that Kupe did, in fact, see many signs of
habitation.
“Certainly by the time the Toi expedition
arrived a century or two later (c1150 AD)
there was no lack of inhabitants in New
Zealand. hey were so numerous, say the
legends, that the followers of Toi spoke of
them as ‘ants’.
“he ‘human ants’ whom Toi discovered
were given the name of Tangata Whenua,
the ‘irst comers’. Where they came
from, we can only guess. hey settled
on many points of the North Island, and
their numbers were such that they pre-
ixed the word “tini”, meaning “myriad”,
to their family name. he people of
Tini-e-Maruiwi were the “human ants”
whom Toi found on the Tamaki Isthmus
(Auckland).
“When the Great Fleet arrived two
centuries later, there was great surprise
at the extent of the Tangata Whenua
population at Tamaki: they were even
more surprised at the pattern of their
defences on the volcanic hills that dotted
the isthmus. It was something entirely
diferent from the Maori of the Fleet.
hey had never seen anything quite like
this in their homeland islands.”
he paradigm changes
Although the earliest dates of human
habitation in NZ (as well as various other
places around the Paciic) are being slowly
pushed back as the evidence continues to
emerge, there is much more evidence still
that remains in museum basements and
storage facilities, and will never see the
light of a display cabinet. his is because
much of it is of a nature that cannot be
explained, and therefore remains hidden
from view. However, while we are aware
of many such artefacts, there is nothing
thus far discovered as utterly intriguing as
the 1874 discovery of a carved tree stump
together with its carving implement – the
age of which deies not only the accepted
paradigm but almost the imagination
itself.
he actual tree stump itself was discovered
near Albert Park in Auckland, while the
workmen were excavating for the library
at the University. It was found under 25
feet (8+ metres) of sediment, together with
a stone implement which was presumably
used to carve it. he discovery was duly
noted in both scholarly and popular
journals of the time. It was unremarkable
save for the fact that lying undisturbed
under 8 metres of sediment meant that it
would have to be very, very old. Perhaps,
as some experts have noted, more than
150,000 years old.
Unfortunately, this discovery was not
considered important enough to merit
its preservation and got “lost”. Neither
the implement nor the stump was ever
mentioned again in the literature.
he Hard Evidence
he original scholarly paper on the
discovery was titled “Notes upon the
probable Changes that have taken place
Diagram of the location of the discovery of the ancient carved treestump and adze
in the Physical Geography of New Zealand
since the arrival of the Maori” by T.H.
Cockburn-Hood, F.G.S. (p112-120). In
it the author “explains some scientiic
evidence in the form of an ancient stump
that proves ancient inhabitants existed
in NZ in a period prior to volcanic land
formation. It is evidence of human activity
in NZ prior to the laying down of ancient
volcanic debris.”
he Auckland Southern Cross newspaper
ran a “Report on the chopped tree stump”
and it apparently created quite a stir at the
time. his is their report:
“Report on the
chopped tree stump”
“An exceedingly interesting relic of the very
remote past is now to be seen in the oice
of the Improvement Commissioners. It
is the root of a tree found in one of the
cuttings being made under the direction
of that Commission.
he root has evidently been chopped
through by a stone adze, which was found
beside it. here were also several small
branches and roots of the same tree on
which the edge of the stone adze had been
tried, and the whole crown of the stump
had the marks of having been laboriously
and patiently cut through by the rude
stone implement in the unknown past,
and by one of an equally unknown race of
human beings.
he root was found when cutting the
sewer up the middle of Coburg Street, near
the lower end, a little above its junction
with the continuation of Wellesley Street,
and at a depth of about 25 feet below the
surface of the Barrack Hill at that place.
From the surface downwards for about
76
14 feet, at the place where the root was
found, the hill is composed of volcanic
matter. Below that depth, for about 8 or 9
feet, there is a series of layers of a mixture
of sand and clay, which appears to have
been at one time deposited under water.
Below that is a large bed of ine blue
‘washdirt’ resembling blue clay.
hese strata and the blue clay do not seem
to have been disturbed by volcanic action,
and the several strata are lying with the
utmost regularity possible. It was in the
upper portion of the bed of blue clay that
the root was found embedded, standing
upright as if it had grown there, and the
several small branches which were found
at the same place were of the same kind of
timber, and bore plain and distinct marks
of the stone implement upon them.
he inference to be drawn is not only
that the islands of New Zealand had been
inhabited long anterior to (before) the
migration of the Maoris to them but that
they had been peopled before the extinct
volcano in the neighbourhood of the present
Mechanic’s Institute had begun to belch its
mud torrents and streams of melted lava.
his conclusion seems to be inevitable,
whether it be assumed that the tree
grew where the root and the implement
of its destruction were, or whether, as
some incline to think, a river had run
where the blue stratum is found, and
that the root had been carried from a
distance to its resting place. In either
case the root must have been where it
was found the other day, not only before
the volcanic matter was deposited on the
Barrack Hill, but for a suiciently long
period before that to permit a stratum of
8 to 10 feet in thickness to be deposited.”
(my emphasis – ed.)
The Original Story:
Note: In the following references “T&P
NZI” is an abbreviation of “Transactions
and Proceedings of the New Zealand
Institute”; “JPS” is an abbreviation of “he
Journal of the Polynesian Society”
REAL MYSTERIES
I have to record this evening a discovery
giving a trace of human life on this
island, and in this locality, reaching back
beyond history, and supporting the Maori
tradition that this island was inhabited
before their arrival here, and that the
Maeros of the North Island and the
Ngatimamaeros of the South Island may
yet be found to be real aborigines, and
not degenerate or
wild Maoris, as has The pre-historic carved nZ tree stump that making paddles. It
been supposed by some modern scientists contend did not has an undoubted
many.
Heavy excavations
have been carried
on at and about the
Albert Barracks
by the Auckland
Improvement
Commissioners
for the purpose of
making new streets
for the beneit of
the city. During last
March, while works were being carried
on in Coburg Street, near the junction of
Wellesley Street East, the workmen came
upon the tree stump, now before you,
lying in the centre of a narrow channel
below the road level, this channel having
been cut for the purpose of laying sewer
pipes. hrough the intelligence of Mr.
James Williamson, the contractors’
overseer, who at once recognised its
value, it was saved. Shortly ater I was on
the spot, and my attention was drawn to
it.
It being important that the discovery
should be veriied by undoubted
authority, I immediately went for, and
returned accompanied by heophilus
Heale, Esq., Inspector of Surveys, who
satisied himself as to the genuineness
of the discovery, and the undisturbed
stratiication of the volcanic debris of
about 25 feet lying above. (PI. VI.)
... I have shown the stump as when
found resting on the clay. It was in its
natural position, upright, with its roots
penetrating the clay, of which fact I
satisied myself by digging deeply below
to a depth of over two feet, and found the
traces of roots going down. he surface
of the clay has loam in it. he top of the
stump was embedded in volcanic mud,
and above it there were 25 feet of debris in
perfect stratiication, as shown in section.
hese stratiied beds of ooze and debris
can be traced till they reach the beds of
cinders, and thence to the conglomerated
mass of scoria and basaltic lava, which
occurs adjacent to the volcanic centre.
he clay in which the stump once grew
occurs immediately above the tertiary
rocks, and is from 10 to 15 feet thick.
his stump is asserted by those who have
a knowledge of New Zealand woods to
be of tea-tree (manuka) the wood that
has been chiely used by the Maoris for
appearance of
having been cut by
some kind of tool,
and being so must
have been by the
hand of man.”
– T&P NZI
Vol Vll - 1874
EDITOR’S NOTE: If
you watched the TV
One Documentary at
8.30pm on Monday
11th September 2000, you would have
heard a volcanologist (or more correctly a
tephrologist) state categorically, that there
was never any evidence found of human
activity in NZ under any layers of volcanic
ash resulting from volcanic activity that
preceded 1250AD.
From: THE SECRET LAND, PEOPLE of Auckland’s International airport; and
BEFORE by Gary J. Cook and homas J.
Brown. Published by StonePrint Press. (ISBN
0-9582040-0-4) Stoneprint Press, Private Bag
55-037, Castle Hill Village, Christchurch
8020, NZ. $29.95
Are the carved tree
stump and axe from
200,000 years ago?
Ross Wiseman
Editor’s note: When I queried Dr Gary Cook
for his estimation as to the date of the carved
tree stump, he referred me to NZ author and
researcher Ross Wiseman who had in fact
consulted two professional volcanologists at
the University of Auckland to verify the age of
77
volcanic debris under which the carved tree
stump was found. Ross’s forthcoming book
ORIGINS deals extensively with this seminal
“anomaly”. his is his reply:
On the 5th of November 2002, I visited the
Geology Department at Auckland University
Campus, situated on the Albert Park
volcano, to discuss the problem of dating the
Auckland volcanoes. I spoke irst with Dr
John Cassidy, who estimated Albert park to
be 150,000 years old +/- 50,000 years.
Next I spoke with Dr Bruce Hayward, who
said Albert Park was 150 to 200, or even 300
thousand years old as a fair estimate because
it is one of the oldest on the Auckland
isthmus.
Next, I showed Dr Bruce Hayward an
enlarged stratiication diagram from the 29th
June, 1874, scientiic report. What the stump
was growing in, below the 25 foot level,
called Tertiary clay, is now called Waitemata
sandstone and mudstone belonging to
Auckland’s pre-volcanic era. From 15 to 25
feet down the report said the strata consisted
of ‘ooze’, cinders, and iron oxide. his is
equivalent to an altered clay, scoria, and
limonite from the weathering of volcanic
scoria. He said the entire 25 feet above the
Waitemata mud and sandstone came from
the Albert Park eruption.
I then asked Dr Bruce Hayward how a date
of 200 thousand years could be justiied. hat
was when he told me about a secret research
project being carried out amongst a top
group of geologists in the department under
the directorship of Professor Ian Smith,
who specialised in volcanology. he aim of
the project was to determine a better dating
technique on Auckland’s volcanoes. he
dating research project involved the drilling
for core samples inside the crater cones of
two of Auckland’s oldest volcanoes - Pukaki
in Mangere, situated two miles northeast
Onepoto at Northcote about one mile north
of the Auckland Harbour bridge.
As the ity-odd Auckland volcanoes have
erupted, their ash deposits have collected in
these two crater cones. What is more, the
same crater cones have collected volcanic
debris from eruptions as far away as the
Volcanic plateau near Taupo, which had
major eruptions 20-30 thousand years ago
and 80 thousand years ago. To cut a long
story short, with the new Lithium dating
techniques available now, accurate ages
of Auckland’s volcanoes can be dated in
the undisturbed sediments within the two
mentioned cones by taking drill bore samples
going back 240,000 years. I was inally
reassured that a date of 200,000 years for the
eruption of Albert Park was indeed accurate.
Excerpted from he Equations of Life by Ross
Wiseman
 F O R B I D D E N
Imagine
By Jon Rapoport
nomorefakenews.com
Contrary to some assessments,
the human being, the soul, the
psyche, the spirit is not looking for
knowledge or even peace as the end-
all and be-all.
he psyche wants to create.
his presumes there is unknown
territory.
his presumes there is uncreated X.
Even more stunning, the psyche
understands that through creating,
everything will be revealed.
On Earth, the cultural ixation is on
discovery of what is there.
On liting the lids on boxes and
peering inside.
his is the detective story. It’s a good
one. Nothing against it.
But there is a confusion between
creating and discovering.
hrough creating, many discoveries
are made, but they are not arrived at
by the direct lid-liting process.
he corollary is: you can’t discover
everything by the direct approach.
his is a worry to the rational ixation.
he rationally obsessed want to
apply the shovel to the ground and
scoop up what’s underneath the top
soil. hat’s all they want to do.
hey understand that process, and
they think any other method puts us
back in the age of superstition.
hey operate totally under the yin-
yang of: inding what is there versus
believing in nonsense. For them
there are no other alternatives.
I once had a very brilliant professor
S C I E N C E
who intensely disliked poetry. He angel who took a portion of light
said that poetry was non-literal from heaven was doomed to rule in
fuzzy thinking. He tried to approach a sweat shop next to a lake of ire and
a poem as a scientist would examine slime where all bad people would go
a microbe. It didn’t work so he gave for eternity.
up.
hat was the oicial opinion of the
In the 20th century, a funny thing Church vis-a-vis creating.
happened to physics on the way to
You will also notice that what is
complete mastery of the universe.
laughingly called history omits
he smaller the particles studied,
mention of the imagination and its
the more paradoxes sprang up. he
prime role in creating events.
efort to observe a single particle
resulted in changing that particle – When you leave that out, what do
so to observe was to run into a brick you get? An age of mechanisation,
wall. he observer was in his own where every happening and artiice
way. Observation itself seemed, in a is expected to be a device that can
sense, to be a creative act. be analysed down to its smallest
wheels.
Speculations emerged from this
conundrum – among them, the idea Given the power of the psyche and
that we might be living in one of what it wants, it’s no surprise that
many universes. We might even be this age is closing down.
living in more than one universe at
the same time.
But physics is married to the
concept of pure and neutral
observation. So in the end, no
(Newtonian – Ed.) physicist
would dare suggest that we were
creating reality – or should.
About this the psyche cares not
at all.
he psyche looks for
inspiration. For a launching
pad. For invention. he psyche
wants to imagine and create.
his is the ire that Prometheus
stole from the gods. his is why
he was chained to a rock where
birds could peck at his liver.
he Roman Church re-told this
myth with its own slant. he
78
 Comparing the NASA Mars images with
those from the ESA: What’s going on?
• maRS SKY IS REallY
bluE and RoCKS HaVE
GREEn PaTCHES
he US spent millions of dollars sending
the Viking Lander I to Mars in 1976. he
world waited in great anticipation to see
the irst colour images of Mars. At about
2:00 PM PDT on July 21, 1976, the irst
colour image from the surface of another
planet arrived at JPL in wonderful colour.
Mars showed its beautiful blue sky, brown
and reddish soil and rocks with patches of
green.
he world never saw the true images
according to the men who worked at the
Viking Image Formatting and Processing
section of JPL. One of the men, Mr. Van
der Woude, has testiied that "Both Ron
Wichelman and I were responsible for the
colour quality control of the Viking Lander
photographs, and Dr. Tomas Mutch, the
Viking Imaging Team Leader, told us he
got a call from the NASA Administrator
asking that we destroy the Mars blue sky
negative created from the digital data."
he images were then
falsely reddened to
make it appear there
was no life, no green
algae or lichen on the
planet. (See Mars the
Living Planet by Barry
Digregorio, Dr. Gilbert
Levin and Dr. Pat
Straat. Page 142.)
• THE VIKInG landER
dId FInd EVIdEnCE oF
lIFE on maRS.
he tests, and follow-on samples, showed
the evidence everyone had agreed on
prior to the mission that would conirm
the presence of life. Dr. Levin and his
team were proud for they had discovered
the irst proof of life on another planet.
Dr. Levin strongly believes they found
life on Mars in 1976, but NASA insisted
the instrumentation must be faulty.
he oicial NASA answer was to deny
the existence of alien life despite strong
scientiic evidence.
All reasonable arguments against the
Viking Mission life detection system had
been overcome except for the claimed
absence of water. Yet many scientists knew
the images also showed evidence of water
– such as the ice cap.
Until recently the discovery of water on
Mars, including waterspouts and geysers,
were also hidden from both scientists and
the public.
THE TRUE COLOURS OF MARS
Some NASA personnel even claim UFOs
were air-brushed out of photos. Assuming
Senator (and former NASA astronaut)
John Glenn, and other NASA astronauts
like Gordon Cooper, are correct when
they claim NASA is hiding the truth about
UFOS, a deliberate policy has been in
efect to hide the possibility of intelligent
life in the universe.
Billions of taxpayers dollars have been
spent trying to perpetuate this false
assumption, and only recently are the true
indings coming out. In fact, numerous
strange anomalies have been found on
Mars, and the question remains as to
why NASA (and other US government
agencies) are so intent on keeping this
knowledge from the world.
he following pages contain only a small
fraction of the photographic evidence of
these “anomalies”, as well as the discovery
of what clearly appears to be running
water on the surface on the planet. How
long NASA will be able to keep up the
pretence of scientiic objectivity and
“independence” is a matter of conjecture.

he book also explains

how the tests for
existence of life on Mars
were rigged to deny life,
despite the relatively
favorable conditions.
Dr. Gilbert V. Levin
who was in charge
of the Viking Lander
experiments revealed
that when the Mars soil
was examined by on
board instruments in
a miniature laboratory
there was a startling 1979 NASA Viking Mars false colour 1979 NASA Viking Mars true colour
positive response.

79
Are there blue river
canyons on Mars?
The Europen Space Agency apparently thinks so.
European Space Agency image 2004
Why are the
European
Space agency’s
images better
than naSa’s?
EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (ESA) photos
are showing blue river-like canyons and
valleys on Mars.
hese blue areas appear to be caused by
possibly lowing rivers or colours retained
from water that once lowed – or perhaps
growing algae or bacteria. Blue is also shown
inside some craters. On Earth Lapis Lazuli,
Blue Viteral, and the dark blue azurite is
a hydrated copper-carbonate indicating
water. Photosynthesis pigments, and copper
bearing minerals oten show blue or green
colours. Photosynthesis is the formation of
carbohydrates in living plants from water and
carbon dioxide by the action of sunlight on
the chlorophyll.
he blue colour now being shown by ESA
is a major step forward in revealing the true
nature of Mars and that at least some water
is present. In Western Australia stromatolites
are layered rocks that form in the presence of
colonies of blue-green bacteria. As sediments
accumulate, they include the remnants of
the bacterial corpses, which give the rock the
distinctive appearance. It is doubtful that blue
mineral deposits would follow the apparent
riverbed so living organisms such as bacteria;
algae, lichen might be responsible for the blue
colour. of taxpayer dollars are being spent to send
Satellite data of Earth seldom shows blue should investigate why the photos from US
colours unless water is involved. equipment are so poor, and why they are
ESA is showing pronounced blue colours
that have not been shown in NASA/JPL/
MSSS photos, further indicating that some
kind of false colouring methods are being
used by NASA. Blue colour images become
extremely important in proving that life
exists or once existed on Mars. Many of the
rocks, if shown in their real colours, show
green patches of colour indicating lichen or
fungi. It appears the carbon dioxide content
of the Martian atmosphere is replenished
by an active microbial ecosystem. Martian
organisms may be very eicient rock eaters, as
80
evidenced by the numerous holes or pits in
the rocks at the Mars landing sites.
he book, Mars, the Living Planet by Barry
Digregorio, Dr. Gilbert Levin and
Dr. Pat Straat provides disturbing information
on colour on Mars. Mr. Van der Woude says,
"Both Ron Wichelman and I were responsible
for the colour quality control of the Viking
Lander photographs, and Dr. Tomas Mutch,
the Viking Imaging Team Leader told us
he got a call from the NASA Administrator
asking that we destroy the Mars blue sky
negative created from the digital data." he
images were then falsely reddened to make
it appear there was no life, no green algae or
lichen on the planet. (Page 142). he question,
"Why is NASA withholding blue coloured
photos from the public? Keep watching the
blues.
"Two hours ater the irst colour image (of
Mars from the Viking Lander) appeared on
the monitors a technician abruptly changed
the image from the light-blue sky and Arizona
like landscape to a uniform orange-red sky
and landscape." What Gil Levin, Ro and
Patricia Straat did not know is that the order
to change the colours came directly from
NASA Administrator himself, Dr. James
Fletcher.
"Why was the NASA scientiic community
blatantly ignoring crucial scientiic data that
could support the notion of life on Mars?"
ESA photos are showing blue splotches inside
craters and in valleys. In ESA photos we are
seeing green and blue colours – where in
NASA/JPL/MSSS images they are showing
reddish brown. Why the discrepancy? Whose
colour scheme is more accurate? Billions
apparently false data to the public. Congress
apparently wrongly coloured. In 1962, I
was examining satellite photos of Earth far
superior to ours in 2004. Why are not higher
quality images being presented to the public?
http://www.esa.int/export/mex_mm/
images/17_LAN_1.jpg
 Anomalous “erosion” patterns on Mars,
suggesting open cast or “strip” mining.

Martian crater showing the

presence of a large water/ice
lake. Note the snow or ice on
crater rim. (ESA image)

Spirit Lander Image of

Rectangular Hole
Martian microbes may secrete concentrated Meandering Martian river bed? (ESA image)
organic acids to bore into the rock. here
appear to be chasms as they bore holes
as they eat into the rock. Rock boring
organisms on Earth are common, and this
or other mechanisms are occurring on Mars. ESA Image
he new Mars Landers are already picking up
large square holes in the rocks. Additionally,
the newly revealed blue colouring of the sky
indicates much greater biosphere than has “he life on Mars issue has recently
been admitted by NASA. Coral or lichen like undergone a paradigm shit,” said
objects are being imaged by the Opportunity Ian Wright, an astrobiologist at
Lander. Photo courtesy of Norman Bryden. the Planetary and Space Sciences
Research Institute at the Open
University in Britain, “to the extent
now that one can talk about the
possibility of present life on Mars
without risking scientiic suicide.”

Martian “blue craters”

81
Lunar and Martian anomalies
For more than 300 years astronomers have been discovering and
imaging lunar and Martian anomalies. Lunar ones are called
“TLPs” (Transient Lunar Phenomena) and include strange lights,
sometimes seen in geometic patterns, while others appear to be
solid structures. Below is a small sampling of recent discoveries.

Martian artifacts below as imaged by NASA in

2004 (Rover Mission)

BELOW: An apparently artiicial shape in the

moon crater “Vitello” – the same main crater as
in opposite page

Are these the “canals” that astronomers like Percival

Lowell saw and photographed in 1905?

Anomalous structure on Mars irst

photographed by Mariner 9 in late 1970s.

In this picture taken at the irst press conference at JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratories
USA) ater the successful landing of the Rover in 2004, we see a Martian blue sky.

82
  
   
European Space Agency satellite image of possible
forests on Mars. See page #

Read what NASA says . . .

and then decide for yourself.

OFFICIAL NASA EXPLANATION: “Lunar Orbiter V photographed an area in the Vitello crater (south of Mare
Humorum at 30.61degrees S latitude, 37.57 degrees W longitude) on August 17, 1967. The enlarged portion
of that high-resolution telephoto picture reveals two large “rolling stones”, whose paths are clearly visible.
The larger one near the center of the picture is about 23 meters across and has rolled or bounced some 274
meters. The smaller rock is 4.6 meters across and has traveled 365 meters.”

QUESTIONS: One major trouble with this explanation is that both "rocks” are actually rolling uphill, out of
various small craters. Both objects are also highly reflective and stand out from the landscape of real rocks.
Their shadows are conical and both objects appear to be smooth in texture. So what are they ... really? For
this and more than 40 more stories of suppression, scientific cover-ups, and brilliant breakthroughs, read
SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS AND OTHER DISCOVERIES, edited by Jonathan Eisen.
Available from: The Full Court Press, Private Bag MBE- P-345, Auckland. $NZ29.95.
See page 55 for details.
83

Big Bang Theory:
Overcome by Fact
David Talbott www.thunderbolts.info
You’d never know it from
oicial news releases, but the
Big Bang heory is broken
and can’t be ixed.
A concession speech may be unlikely in
2005, but the progressive decline of one
of the twentieth century’s most popular
theories now seems inescapable. he Big
Bang has lost its theoretical foundation,
which was the Doppler interpretation of
"redshit". his was the linking of redshit
to the stretching of light wavelengths
as objects move away from us. It is now
known that, while almost all observed
galaxies are redshited, the Doppler
interpretation of this shit does not
provide a reliable measure of velocity
or (indirectly) of distance. Quasars
and galaxies of diferent redshit stand
in physical proximity to each other
and are observed to be connected by
ilaments of matter. Quasars, whose high
redshit would place them at the outer
edges of the visible universe, are in fact
physically and energetically linked to
nearby low-redshit active galaxies. he
Big Bang heory was dismantled by direct
observation-including a highly redshited
quasar in front of a nearby galaxy!
In the rise and fall of the Big Bang
of light-years.
While big bang theorists have cobbled
together “explanations” for small-scale
examples of the efect, the picture as a
whole can only be illusory. he galaxies
are not, in fact, stretched out on radial
lines from the earth in the way suggested
by the “map”, but the invalid Doppler
interpretation of redshit does create that
ludicrous picture. Rationalisations of this
hypothesis no name looms with greater efect have been a disservice to science.
distinction than that of Halton Arp, the heorists should have stopped to notice
leading authority on peculiar galaxies. the obvious.
Over decades, Arp amassed meticulous
observations challenging the standard he failure of the Big Bang hypothesis
use of redshit (the stretching of light could be the tipping point in the
wavelengths as objects move away from collapse of modern cosmology, with
us) to prove an "expanding universe". reverberations afecting all of the
But astronomers ignored theoretical sciences. No domain of
or dismissed Arp’s scientiic inquiry stands in isolation.
work, insisting that his
conclusions were either It is now known that intense electric
erroneous or impossible. discharge (such as coronal mass ejections
Arp lost his teaching from the Sun) can generate a redshit
position. hen he lost his having no connection to relative velocities.
telescope time and had to
move to Germany to carry Originally, cosmologists developed their
on his work at the Max ideas about redshit and the Big Bang
Planck Institute. under the assumption of an electrically
inert universe. heir theoretical starting
For established science thepoint invariably shaped their thinking
greatest embarrassment about the birth of galaxies. And these
could come from public ideas, in turn, conditioned scientiic
realization that, for reasoning as to how a galaxy’s constituent
decades, astronomers stars came into existence. Concepts
suppressed the warning of star formation further constrained
signs. he critical scientiic reasoning about planetary
challenge was raised years ago, as early asorigins and the evolution of life. From
the 1960’s, when Arp began publishing the core of intertwined assumptions, the
his indings. To his credit, Cornell chains of logic reached out to inspire –
astronomer Carl Sagan acknowledged but also to shackle – human exploration.
the problem when he was writing Cosmos In this environment, cosmologists and
(published in 1980). But in the following astronomers were free to present the
years politically inluential scientists "expanding universe" and the orthodox
looked the other way, and the word theory of the age and size of the universe
quietly went out to science
editors at major newspaper
and news magazines that Arp
had been fully answered and
no more time was needed on "he foundation of the Big Bang
the question.
heory was the linking of redshit to
Here is an interesting the stretching of light wavelengths as
historical fact: For many years
objects move away from us. It is now
it has been known that the
map of the universe acquires known that, while almost all observed
a bizarre appearance when
galaxies are redshited, the Doppler
you let redshit determine
distances. Suddenly galactic interpretation of this shit does not
clusters stretch out in radial
provide a reliable measure of velocity
lines absurdly pointing at the
earth. he efect is called “the or (indirectly) of distance."
ingers of God,” and the earth-
directed “ingers” span billions
84
as facts. However, alongside these “facts”
have come a host of mathematical
ictions: from dark matter and dark
energy to the ever popular “black hole”.
John Glenn, former
hough much of today’s exercises astronaut (and current
in esoteric mathematics came ater
publication of Sagan’s Cosmos, America’s
favourite astronomer in the 1980s had
US Senator), claims
registered a timely warning: “If Arp is
right, the exotic mechanisms proposed to NASA UFO coverup:
explain the energy source of the distant
quasars – supernova chain reactions,
super-massive black holes and the like
– would be unnecessary. Quasars need
not then be very distant”.

Over the past quarter century the

pure mathematicians, with little or
no interest in experimental science
and only a passing regard for direct
"Back in those glory days, I was very
observation, have indulged in a carnival
of speculation. But it is mind altering uncomfortable when they asked us to
to realize that almost nothing revealed
by our more powerful telescopes was
anticipated by these theorists. We
say things we didn't want to say and
now observe a superabundance of ine
ilaments across vast reaches of space. In deny other things. Some people asked,
the electrically neutral cosmos claimed by
gravity-based cosmology, these ilaments
ind no credible cause. But in plasma
you know, were you alone out there? We
experiments with electric discharge, they
are pedictable. In fact, Nobel laureate never gave the real answer, and yet we
Hannes Alfvén, the father of plasma
physics, showed that cosmologists
are mistaken when they imagine that
see things out there, strange things, but
magnetic ields can be "frozen" into a
plasma. Electric currents are required to we know what we saw out there. And we
sustain cosmic magnetic ields. And now,
everywhere we look we see magnetic
ields at work: electricity is lowing across
couldn't really say anything. he bosses
immense distances in space. At both the
stellar and galactic scales, these currents were really afraid of this, they were afraid
interact with the magnetic ields they
induce to create complex structure-
strings of galaxies, galactic and stellar
of the War of the Worlds type stuf, and
jets, and beautiful bipolar stellar nebulas
– all with features never envisioned by about panic in the streets. So, we had to
gravitational theorists, yet corresponding
in stunning detail to plasma discharge
formations in the laboratory.
keep quiet. And now we only see these
Will the year 2005 see a new beginning things in our nightmares or maybe in
for cosmology? Probably not, when you
consider the sheer momentum of earlier
theory, together with the potential costs
the movies, and some of them are pretty
in terms of reputations, public funding,
and threatened jobs. close to being the truth.”
Maybe next year.

85
“Peak Oil” is the slogan for the idea that we have reached the point where oil production can no longer keep up
with demand and that we are rapidly running out of oil, and when it’s all gone there will be no more, and we had
better adjust to that “fact”. BUT WAIT: Are we really running out of oil – or are we being scammed again by the
biggest,richest and least ethical industry on the planet? he following article presents the compelling case for the
continuous creation of oil from the elements found naturally deep beneath the earth's surface. his is known as the
“abiotic” theory which maintains that oil is not a “fossil fuel”. Judge for yourself:

IF “THE WORLD” IS
RUNNING OUT OF OIL –
WHY AREN’T
THE RUSSIANS???
"It appears that, unbeknownst to Westerners, there have actually been, for quite some
time now, two competing theories concerning the origins of petroleum. One theory claims
that oil is an organic 'fossil fuel' deposited in finite quantities near the planet's surface.
The other theory claims that oil is continuously generated by natural processes in the
Earth's magma. One theory is backed by a massive body of research representing fifty
years of intense scientific inquiry. The other theory is an unproven relic of the eighteenth
century. One theory anticipates deep oil reserves, refillable oil fields, migratory oil
systems, deep sources of generation, and the spontaneous venting of gas and oil. The
other theory has a difficult time explaining any such documented phenomena. So which
theory have we in the West,
in our infinite wisdom,
chosen to embrace? Why,
the fundamentally absurd
'Fossil Fuel' theory,
of course-the same
theory that the 'Peak Oil'
doomsday warnings are
based on."

By Harry Mason
GEOLOGIST-GEOPHYSICIST

86
Is Oil a “Fossil Fuel”?
As anyone who stayed awake during
elementary school science class knows,
oil comes from dinosaurs. I remember as
a young boy seeing some kind of 'public
service' TV spot explaining how dinosaurs
"gave their all" so that we could one day
have oil. It seemed a reasonable enough
idea at the time - from the perspective of
an eight-year-old. But if, as an adult, you
really stop to give it some thought, doesn't
the idea seem a little, uhmm ... what's the
word I'm looking for here? ... oh yeah, I
remember now ... preposterous?
How could dinosaurs have possibly
created the planet's vast oil ields? Did
millions, or even billions, of them die at
the very same time and at the very same
place?
Were there dinosaur Jonestowns on a
grand scale occurring at locations all
across the planet? And how did they all
get buried so quickly? Because if they
weren't buried right away, wouldn't
they have just decomposed and/or been
consumed by scavengers? And how much
oil can you really squeeze from a pile of
parched dinosaur skeletons?
Maybe there was some type of cataclysmic
event that caused the sudden extinction
of the dinosaurs and also buried them –
like the impact of an asteroid or a comet.
But even so, you wouldn't think that all
the dinosaurs would have been huddled
together waiting to become oil ields. And
besides, scientists are now backing away
from the mass extinction theory.
http://www.latimes.com
he Wall Street Journal noted that it "would
take a pretty big pile of dead dinosaurs
to account for the estimated 660 billion
barrels of oil in the [Middle East]." I don't
know what the precise dinosaur-carcass-
to-barrel-of-oil conversion rate is, but it
does seem like it would take a hell of a lot
of dead dinosaurs. Even if we generously
allow that a single dinosaur could yield
5 barrels of oil (an absurd notion, but
let's play along for now), more than 130
billion dinosaurs would have had to be
simultaneously entombed in just one
small region of the world. But were there
really hundreds of billions of dinosaurs
roaming the earth? If so, then why there
is all this talk now of overpopulation and
scarce resources, when all we are currently
dealing with is less than 7 billion people
populating the same earth.
And why the Middle East? Was that
region some kind of Mecca for dinosaurs?
Was it the climate, or the lack of water
and vegetation, that drew them there? Of
course, the region could have been much
diferent in prehistoric times. Maybe it was
like the Great Valley in the Land Before
Time movies. Or maybe the dinosaurs
had to cross the Middle East to get to
the Great Valley, but they never made
it, because they got bogged down in the
desert and ultimately became (through,
I'm guessing here, some alchemical
process) cans of 10W-40 motor oil.
Another version of the 'fossil fuel' story
holds that microscopic animal carcasses
and other biological matter gathered on
the world's sea loors, with that organic
matter then being covered over with
sediment over the course of millions of
years. You would think, however, that any
biological matter would decompose long
How could dinosaurs
have possibly created
the planet's vast oil
ields? Did millions, or
even billions, of them
die at the very same
time and at the very
same place?
before being covered over by sediment.
But I guess not. And I guess there were
no bottom-feeders in those days to clear
the ocean loors of organic debris. Fair
enough. But I still don't understand how
those massive piles of biological debris,
some consisting of hundreds of billions of
tons of matter, could have just suddenly
appeared, so that they could then sit,
undisturbed, for millions of years as they
were covered over with sediment. I can
understand how biological detritus could
accumulate over time, mixed in with the
sediment, but that wouldn't really create
the conditions for the generation of vast
reservoirs of crude oil. So I guess I must
be missing something here.
he notion that oil is a 'fossil fuel' was irst
proposed by Russian scholar Mikhailo
Lomonosov in 1757. Lomonosov's
rudimentary hypothesis, based on the
limited base of scientiic knowledge
that existed at the time, and on his own
simple observations, was that "Rock
oil originates as tiny bodies of animals
87
buried in the sediments which, under the
inluence of increased temperature and
pressure acting during an unimaginably
long period of time, transform into rock
oil."
Two and a half centuries later,
Lomonosov's theory remains as it was in
1757 – an unproved, and almost entirely
speculative, hypothesis. Returning once
again to the Wall Street Journal, we ind
that, "Although the world has been
drilling for oil for generations, little is
known about the nature of the resource
or the underground activities that led to
its creation."
A paragraph in the Encyclopedia
Britannica concerning the origins of oil
ends thusly: "In spite of the great amount
of scientiic research ... there remain
many unresolved questions regarding its
origins."
Does that not seem a little odd? We are
talking here, ater all, about a resource
that, by all accounts, plays a crucial role in
a vast array of human endeavours (by one
published account, petroleum is a raw
ingredient in some 70,000 manufactured
products, including medicines, synthetic
fabrics, fertilizers, paints and varnishes,
acrylics, plastics, and cosmetics). By
many accounts, the very survival of the
human race is entirely dependent on the
availability of petroleum. And yet we
know almost nothing about this most life-
sustaining of the earth's resources. And
even though, by some shrill accounts, the
well is about to run dry, no one seems to
be overly concerned with understanding
the nature and origins of so-called
'fossil fuels.' Rather, we are content with
continuing our embrace of an unproved
18th century theory which, if subjected
to any sort of logical analysis, seems
ludicrous.
A chink in the armour
On September 26, 1995, the New
York Times ran an article headlined
"Geochemist Says Oil Fields May Be
Reilled Naturally." Penned by Malcolm
W. Browne, the piece appeared on page
C1.
“Could it be that many of the world's oil
ields are reilling themselves at nearly the
same rate they are being drained by an
energy hungry world?
“A geochemist at the Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution in
Massachusetts ... Dr. Jean K. Whelan ...
infers that oil is moving in quite rapid
spurts from great depths to reservoirs
closer to the surface. Sceptics of Dr.
Whelan's hypothesis ... say her explanation
remains to be proved ... Discovered in
1972, an oil reservoir some 6,000 feet
beneath Eugene Island 330 [not actually
an island, but a patch of sea loor in the
Gulf of Mexico] is one of the world's most
productive oil sources ... Eugene Island
330 is remarkable for another reason: its
estimated reserves have declined much
less than experts had predicted on the
basis of its production rate.
"It could be," Dr. Whelan said, "that at some
sites, particularly where there is a lot of
faulting in the rock, a reservoir from which
oil is being pumped might be a steady-state
system-one that is replenished by deeper
reserves as fast as oil is pumped out ...
“he discovery that oil seepage is
continuous and extensive from many
ocean vents lying above fault zones has
convinced many scientists that oil is
making its way up through the faults
from much deeper deposits.
“ ... A recent report from the Department
of Energy Task Force on Strategic Energy
Research and Development concluded
from the Woods Hole project that "their
new data and interpretations strongly
suggest that the oil and gas in the Eugene
Island ield could be treated as a steady-
state rather than a ixed resource." he
report added, "Preliminary analysis also
suggest that similar phenomena may be
taking place in other producing areas,
including the deep-water Gulf of Mexico
and the Alaskan North Slope" ... here
is much evidence that deep reserves of
hydrocarbon fuels remain to be tapped.”
his compelling article raised a number of
questions, including: how did all those piles
of dinosaur carcasses end up thousands of
feet beneath the earth's surface?
he Eugene Island story was revisited by
the media three-and-a-half years later,
by the Wall Street Journal (Christopher
Cooper "Odd Reservoir Of Louisiana
Prods Oil Experts to Seek a Deeper
Meaning," Wall Street Journal, April 16,
1999).
http://www.oralchelation.com/faq/wsj4.htm
“Something mysterious is going on at
Eugene Island 330. Production at the oil
ield, deep in the Gulf of Mexico of the
coast of Louisiana, was supposed to have
declined years ago. And for a while, it
behaved like any normal ield: Following
its 1973 discovery, Eugene Island 330's
output peaked at about 15,000 barrels a
day. By 1989, production had slowed to
about 4,000 barrels a day. hen suddenly
– some say almost inexplicably – Eugene
Island's fortunes reversed. he ield,
operated by PennzEnergy Co., is now
producing 13,000 barrels a day, and
probable reserves have rocketed to more
“he discovery that oil
seepage is continuous
and extensive from
many ocean vents
lying above fault
zones has convinced
many scientists that
oil is making its way
up through the faults
from much deeper
deposits.”
than 400 million barrels from 60 million.
Stranger still, scientists studying the ield
say the crude coming out of the pipe is of
a geological age quite diferent from the
oil that gushed 10 years ago. All of which
has led some scientists to a radical theory:
Eugene Island is rapidly reilling itself,
perhaps from some continuous source
miles below the Earth's surface. hat,
they say, raises the tantalising possibility
that oil may not be the limited resource
it is assumed to be. ... Jean Whelan, a
88
geochemist and senior researcher from the
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
in Massachusetts ... says, "I believe there
is a huge system of oil just migrating"
deep underground. ... About 80 miles
of the Louisiana coast, the underwater
landscape surrounding Eugene Island is
otherworldly, cut with deep issures and
faults that spontaneously belch gas and
oil.”
So now we are talking about a huge
system of migrating dinosaur goo that is
miles beneath the Earth's surface! hose
dinosaurs were rather craty, weren't they?
Exactly three years later (to the day), the
media once again paid a visit to the Gulf
of Mexico. his time, it was Newsday that
iled the report. (Robert Cooke "Oil Field's
Free Reill," Newsday, April 19, 2002):
http://csf.colourado.edu
"Deep underwater, and deeper
underground, scientists see surprising
hints that gas and oil deposits can be
replenished, illing up again, sometimes
rapidly. Although it sounds too good to
be true, increasing evidence from the Gulf
of Mexico suggests that some old oil ields
are being reilled by petroleum surging
up from deep below, scientists report.
‘hat may mean that current estimates
of oil and gas abundance are far too low,
chemical oceanographer Mahlon ‘Chuck’
Kennicutt [said]. hey are reilling as we
speak. But whether this is a worldwide
phenomenon, we don't know...”
Prof. Kennicutt, a faculty member at Texas
A&M University, said it is now clear that
gas and oil are coming into the known
reservoirs very rapidly in terms of geologic
time. he inlow of new gas, and some oil,
has been detectable in as little as three to
10 years. In the past, it was not suspected
that oil ields can reill because it was
assumed that oil was formed in place, or
nearby, rather than far below. According
to marine geologist Harry Roberts, at
Louisiana State University “... (Y)ou have
a very leaky fault system that does allow
it (petroleum) to migrate in. It's directly
connected to an oil and gas generating
system at great depth...”
"here already appears to be a large body
of evidence consistent with ... oil and
gas generation and migration on very
short time scales in many areas globally,"
[Jean Whelan] wrote in the journal Sea
Technology. “Analysis of the ancient oil
that seems to be coming up from deep
below in the Gulf of Mexico suggests
that the low of new oil is coming from
deeper, hotter [sediment] formations and
is not simply a lateral inlow from the old
deposits that surround existing oil ields,”
Whelan] said.
Now I'm really starting to get confused.
Can someone please walk me through
this? What exactly is an "oil and gas
generating system"? And how does such
a system generate oil "on very short time
scales"?
Is someone down there right now, even
as I type these words, forkliting dinosaur
carcasses into some gigantic cauldron to
cook up a fresh batch of oil?
Desperate for answers to such perplexing
questions, I turned for advice to Mr. Peak
Oil himself, Michael Ruppert. his is what
I found: "Oil ... is the result of climactic
conditions that have existed at only one
time in the earth's 4.5 billion year history."
I'm guessing that that "one time" – that
one golden window of opportunity to
get just the right mix of dinosaur stew
– isn't the present time, so it doesn't seem
quite right, to me at least, that oil is being
generated right now.
In June 2003, Geotimes paid a visit to the
Gulf of Mexico ("Raining Hydrocarbons
in the Gulf "), and the story grew yet more
compelling:
http://www.geotimes.org/june03/NN_gulf.html
“Below the Gulf of Mexico, hydrocarbons
low upward through an intricate network
of conduits and reservoirs ... and this
is all happening now, not millions and
millions of years ago,” says Larry Cathles,
a chemical geologist at Cornell University.
"We're dealing with this giant low-
through system where the hydrocarbons
are generating now, moving through
the overlying strata now, building the
reservoirs now and spilling out into the
ocean now," Cathles says.
Cathles and his team estimate that in a
study area of about 9,600 square miles
of the coast of Louisiana [including
Eugene Island 330], source rocks a dozen
kilometers [roughly seven miles] down
have generated as much as 184 billion tons
of oil and gas-about 1,000 billion barrels of
oil and gas equivalent. "hat's 30 percent
more than we humans have consumed
over the entire petroleum era," Cathles
says. "And that's just this one little postage
stamp area; if this is going on worldwide,
then there's a lot of hydrocarbons venting
out."
Dry oil wells spontaneously reilling?
Oil generation and migration systems?
Massive oil reserves miles beneath the
earth's surface? Spontaneous venting
of enormous volumes of gas and oil?
(Roberts noted that - and this isn't really
going to please the environmentalists,
but I'm just reporting the facts, ma'am -
"natural seepage" in areas like the Gulf
of Mexico "far exceeds anything that gets
spilled" by the oil industry. And those
natural emissions have been pumped into
our oceans since long before there was an
oil industry.)
he all too obvious question here is: how
is any of that explained by a theory that
holds that oil and gas are 'fossil fuels'
created in inite quantities through a
unique geological process that occurred
millions of years ago?
Why do we insist on retaining an antiquated
theory that is so obviously contradicted
by readily observable phenomena? Is the
advancement of the sciences not based on
formulating a hypothesis, and then testing
that hypothesis? And if the hypothesis
fails to account for the available data, is
it not customary to either modify that
hypothesis or formulate a new hypothesis-
89
rather than, say, clinging to the same
discredited hypothesis for 250 years?
In August 2002, the journal Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences
published a study authored by J.F. Kenney,
V.A. Kutchenov, N.A. Bendeliani and
V.A. Alekseev. he authors argued, quite
compellingly, that oil is not created from
organic compounds at the temperatures
and pressures found close to the surface
of the earth, but rather is created from
inorganic compounds at the extreme
temperatures and pressures present only
near the core of the earth.
http://www.gasresources.net/index.htm
As Geotimes noted ("Inorganic Origin
of Oil: Much Ado About Nothing?,"
Geotimes, November 2002), the journal
"published the paper at the request of
Academy member Howard Reiss, a
chemical physicist at the University of
California at Los Angeles. As per the PNAS
guidelines for members communicating
papers, Reiss obtained reviews of the
paper from at least two referees from
diferent institutions (not ailiated with
the authors) and shepherded the report
through revisions."
http://www.geotimes.org/nov02/NN_oil.html
I mention that because I happened to read
something that Michael Ruppert wrote
recently that seems pertinent: "In real life,
it is called 'the proof is in the pudding.' In
scientiic circles, it is called peer review,
and it usually involves having your
research published in a peer-reviewed
journal. It is an oten-frustrating process,
but peer-reviewed articles ensure the
validity of science."
http://www.fromthewilderness.com
It would seem then that we can safely
conclude that what Kenney, et.al. have
presented is valid science, since it deinitely
was published in a peer-reviewed journal.
And what that valid science says, quite
clearly, is that petroleum is not by any
stretch of the imagination a inite resource,
or a 'fossil fuel,' but is in fact a resource
that is continuously generated by natural
processes deep within the planet.
Geotimes also noted that the research
paper "examined thermodynamic
arguments that say methane is the only
organic hydrocarbon to exist within
Earth's crust." Indeed, utilising the laws
of modern thermodynamics, the authors
constructed a mathematical model that
proves that oil can not form under the
conditions dictated by the 'fossil fuel'
theory.
I mention that because of something else
I read on Ruppert's site. Listed as #5 of
"Nine Critical Questions to Ask About
Alternative Energy" is: "Most of the other
questions in this list can be tied up into
this one question: does the invention
defy the Laws of hermodynamics? If the
answer is yes, then something is wrong."
http://www.fromthewilderness.com
Well then, Mr. Ruppert, I have some very
bad news for you, because something
deinitely is wrong with your 'Peak Oil'
theory. Because here we have a published
study in Geotimes, subjected to peer
review (thus assuring the "validity" of
the study), that demonstrates, with
mathematical certainty that it is actually
the 'fossil fuel' theory that deies the laws
of thermodynamics. It appears then that
if we follow Ruppert's Laws, we have to
rule out fossil fuels as a viable alternative
to petroleum.
Reaction to the publication of the Kenney
study was swit. First to weigh in was
(Tom Clarke "Fossil Fuels Without the
Fossils: Petroleum: Animal, Vegetable or
Mineral?," Nature News Service, August
14, 2002):
"Petroleum – the archetypal fossil fuel
– couldn't have formed
from the remains of
dead animals and plants,
claim US and Russian
researchers. hey
argue that petroleum
originated from minerals
at extreme temperatures
and pressures. Other
geochemists say that
the work resurrects a
scientiic debate that
is almost a fossil itself,
and criticise the team's
conclusions. he team, led
by J.F. Kenney of the Gas
Resources Corporation
in Houston, Texas,
mimicked conditions
more than 100 kilometres
below the earth's surface
by heating marble,
iron oxide and water
to around 1500° C and
50,000 times atmospheric pressure. hey
produced traces of methane, the main
constituent of natural gas, and octane, the
hydrocarbon molecule that makes petrol.
A mathematical model of the process
suggests that, apart from methane, none
of the ingredients of petroleum could
form at depths less than 100 kilometres."
he geochemist community, and the
petroleum industry, were both suitably
outraged by the publication of the study.
he usual parade of experts was trotted
out, of course, but a funny thing happened:
as much as they obviously wanted to,
those experts were unable to deny the
validity of the research. So they resorted
to a very unusual tactic: they reluctantly
acknowledged that oil can indeed be
created from minerals, but they insisted
that that inconvenient fact really has
nothing to do with the oil that we use.
Showing that oil can also form without a
biological origin does not disprove [the
'fossil fuel'] hypothesis, they claimed.
"It doesn't discredit anything," said a
geochemist who asked not to be named.
"No one disputes that hydrocarbons can
form this way," says Mark McCafrey,
a geochemist with Oil Tracers LLC, a
petroleum-prospecting consultancy in
Dallas, Texas. A tiny percentage of natural
oil deposits are known to be non-biological,
but this doesn't mean that petrol isn't a
fossil fuel, he says. "I don't know anyone
in the petroleum community who really
takes this prospect seriously," says Walter
Michaelis, a geochemist at the University
of Hamburg in Germany.
So I guess the geochemist
community is a petulant
lot. hey did "concede",
however, that oil "that forms
inorganically at the high
temperatures and massive
pressures close to the Earth's
mantle layer could be forced
upwards towards the surface
by water, which is denser than
oil. It can then be trapped by
sedimentary rocks that are
impermeable to oil."
What they were acknowled-
ging, lest anyone mis-
understand, is that the oil that
we pump out of reservoirs near
the surface of the earth, and
the oil that is spontaneously
and continuously generated
deep within the earth, could
very well be the same oil.
But even so, they insist, that is
certainly no reason to abandon, or even
question, our perfectly ridiculous 'fossil
fuel' theory.
Coverage by New Scientist of the
'controversial' journal publication largely
mirrored the coverage by Nature (Jef
Hecht "You Can Squeeze Oil Out of a
Stone," New Scientist, August 17, 2002):
90
"Oil doesn't come from dead plants
and animals, but from plain old rock,
a controversial new study claims. he
heat and pressure a hundred kilometres
underground produces hydrocarbons
from inorganic carbon and water, says
J.F. Kenney, who runs the Gas Resources
Corporation, an oil exploration irm in
Houston. He and three Russian colleagues
believe all our oil is made this way, and
untapped supplies are there for the taking.
Petroleum geologists already accept
that some oil forms like this. "Nobody
ever argued that there are no inorganic
sources," says Mike Lewan of the US
Geological Survey. But they take strong
issue with Kenney's claim that petroleum
can't form from organic matter in shallow
rocks.
"Geotimes chimed in as well, quoting
Scott Imbus, an organic geochemist for
Chevron Texaco Corp., who explained
that the Kenney research is "an excellent
and rigorous treatment of the theoretical
and experimental aspects for abiotic
hydrocarbon formation deep in the Earth.
Unfortunately, it has little or nothing to do
with the origins of commercial fossil fuel
deposits."
What we have here, quite clearly, is a
situation wherein the West's leading
geochemists (read: shills for the petroleum
industry) cannot impugn the validity
of Kenney's unassailable mathematical
model, and so they have, remarkably
enough, adopted the unusual strategy of
claiming that there is actually more than
one way to produce oil. It can be created
under extremely high temperatures and
pressures, or it can be created under
relatively low temperatures and pressures.
It can be created organically, or it can be
created inorganically. It can be created
deep within the Earth, or it can be created
near the surface of the Earth. You can
make it with some rocks. Or you can make
it in a box. You can make it here or there.
You can make it anywhere.
While obviously an absurdly desperate
attempt to salvage the 'fossil fuel' theory,
the arguments being ofered by the
geochemist community actually serve to
further undermine the notion that oil is
an irreplaceable 'fossil fuel.' For if we are
now to believe that petroleum can be
created under a wide range of conditions
(a temperature range, for example, of 75°
C to 1500° C), does that not cast serious
doubt on the claim that conditions
favoured the creation of oil just "one time
in the earth's 4.5 billion year history,” as
"Mr Peak Oil" Mike Ruppert claims?
A more accurate review of Kenney's
work appeared in he Economist ("he
Argument Needs Oiling," August 15,
2002):
"Millions of years ago, tiny animals and
plants died. hey settled at the bottom of
the oceans. Over time, they were crushed
beneath layers of sediment that built up
above them and eventually turned into
rock. he organic matter, now trapped
hundreds of metres below the surface,
started to change. Under the action of
gentle heat and pressure, and in the
absence of air, the biological debris turned
into oil and gas.
"Or so the story goes.
"In 1951, however, a group of Soviet
scientists led by Nikolai Kudryavtsev
claimed that this theory of oil production
was iction. hey suggested that
hydrocarbons, the principal molecular
constituents of oil, are generated deep
within the earth from inorganic materials.
Few people outside Russia listened. But
one who did was J. F. Kenney, an American
who today works for the Russian Academy
of Sciences and is also chief executive of
Gas Resources Corporation in Houston,
Texas. He says it is nonsense to believe
that oil derives from "squashed ish and
putreied cabbages.
"his is a brave claim to make when the
overwhelming majority of petroleum
geologists subscribe to the biological
theory of origin. But Dr Kenney has
evidence to support his argument. In the
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, he claims to establish that it is
energetically impossible for alkanes, one
of the main types of hydrocarbon molecule
in crude oil, to evolve from biological
precursors at the depths where reservoirs
have typically been found and plundered.
He has developed a mathematical model
incorporating quantum mechanics,
statistics and thermodynamics which
predicts the behaviour of a hydrocarbon
system. he complex mixture of straight-
chain and branched alkane molecules
found in crude oil could, according to
his calculations, have come into existence
only at extremely high temperatures and
pressures – far higher than those found
in the earth's crust, where the orthodox
theory claims they are formed. To back
up this idea, he has shown that a cocktail
of alkanes (methane, hexane, octane
and so on) similar to that in natural oil
is produced when a mixture of calcium
carbonate, water and iron oxide is heated
to 1,500° C and crushed with the weight of
50,000 atmospheres.
"his experiment reproduced the
conditions in the earth's upper mantle,
100 km below the surface, and so suggests
that oil could be produced there from
completely inorganic sources.”
Kenney's theories, when discussed at
all, are universally described as "new,"
"radical," and "controversial." In truth,
however, Kenney's ideas are not new, nor
original, nor radical. hough no one other
than Kenney himself seems to want to talk
about it, the arguments that he presented
in the PNAS study are really just the tip
of a very large iceberg of suppressed
scientiic research.
J.F. Kenney spent some 15 years studying
under some of the Russian and Ukrainian
scientists who were key contributors to the
modern petroleum theory. When Kenney
speaks about petroleum origins, he is not
speaking as some renegade scientist with a
radical new theory; he is speaking to give
voice to an entire community of scientists
whose work has never been acknowledged
in the West. Kenney writes passionately
about that neglected body of research:
he modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of
deep, abiotic petroleum origins is not new
or recent. his theory was irst enunciated
by Professor Nikolai Kudryavtsev in 1951,
almost a half century ago, (Kudryavtsev
1951) and has undergone extensive
development, reinement, and application
since its introduction. here have been
more than four thousand articles published
in the Soviet scientiic journals, and many
books, dealing with the modern theory.
91
his writer is presently co-authoring a
book upon the subject of the development
and applications of the modern theory
of petroleum for which the bibliography
requires more than thirty pages. he
modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of
deep, abiotic petroleum origins is not the
work of any one single man – nor of a few
men. he modern theory was developed by
hundreds of scientists in the (now former)
U.S.S.R., including many of the inest
geologists, geochemists, geophysicists, and
thermodynamicists of that country. here
have now been more than two generations
of geologists, geophysicists, chemists,
and other scientists in the U.S.S.R. who
have worked upon and contributed to
the development of the modern theory.
(Kropotkin 1956; Anisimov, Vasilyev et
al. 1959; Kudryavtsev 1959; Porir'yev
1959; Kudryavtsev 1963; Raznitsyn
1963; Krayushkin 1965; Markevich 1966;
Dolenko 1968; Dolenko 1971; Linetskii
1974; Letnikov, Karpov et al. 1977;
Porir'yev and Klochko 1981; Krayushkin
1984)
Abiotic Oil heory is
the foundation of the
Modern Russian Oil
Industry
he modern Russian-Ukrainian theory
of deep, abiotic petroleum origins is
not untested or speculative. On the
contrary, the modern theory was severely
challenged by many traditionally-minded
geologists at the time of its introduction;
and during the irst decade thenater, the
modern theory was thoroughly examined,
extensively reviewed, powerfully debated,
and rigorously tested.
Every year following 1951, there were
important scientiic conferences organized
in the U.S.S.R. to debate and evaluate the
modern theory, its development, and its
predictions. he All-Union conferences in
petroleum and petroleum geology in the
years 1952-1964/5 dealt particularly with
this subject. (During the period when the
modern theory was being subjected to
extensive critical challenge and testing, a
number of the men pointed out that there
had never been any similar critical review
or testing of the traditional hypothesis that
petroleum might somehow have evolved
spontaneously from biological detritus.)
he modern Russian-Ukrainian theory
of deep, abiotic petroleum origins is not
a vague, qualitative hypothesis, but stands
as a rigorous analytic theory within the
mainstream of the modern physical
sciences. In this respect, the modern
theory difers fundamentally not only from
the previous hypothesis of a biological
origin of petroleum but also from all
traditional geological hypotheses. Since
the nineteenth century, knowledgeable
physicists, chemists, thermodynamicists,
and chemical engineers have regarded
with grave reservations (if not outright
disdain) the suggestion that highly
reduced hydrocarbon molecules of high
free enthalpy (the constituents of crude
oil) might somehow evolve spontaneously
from highly oxidized biogenic molecules
of low free enthalpy.
Beginning in 1964, Soviet scientists
carried out extensive theoretical
statistical thermodynamic analysis which
established explicitly that the hypothesis
of evolution of hydrocarbon molecules
(except methane) from biogenic ones
in the temperature and pressure regime
of the Earth's near-surface crust was
glaringly in violation of the second law of
thermodynamics. hey also determined
that the evolution of reduced hydrocarbon
molecules requires pressures of
magnitudes encountered at depths equal
to such of the mantle of the Earth. During
the second phase of its development, the
modern theory of petroleum was entirely
recast from a qualitative argument based
upon a synthesis of many qualitative facts
into a quantitative argument based upon
the analytical arguments of quantum
statistical mechanics and thermodynamic
stability theory. (Chekaliuk 1967; Boiko
1968; Chekaliuk 1971; Chekaliuk and
Kenney 1991; Kenney 1995)
he modern Russian-Ukrainian theory
of deep, abiotic petroleum origins is not
controversial nor presently a matter of
academic debate. he period of debate
about this extensive body of knowledge
has been over for approximately two
decades (Simakov 1986). he modern
theory is presently applied extensively
throughout the former U.S.S.R. as the
guiding perspective for petroleum
exploration and development projects.
here are presently more than 80 oil and
gas ields in the Caspian district alone
which were explored and developed by
applying the perspective of the modern
theory and which produce from the
crystalline basement rock. (Krayushkin,
Chebanenko et al. 1994) Similarly,
such exploration in the western Siberia
cratonic-rit sedimentary basin has
developed 90 petroleum ields of which
80 produce either partly or entirely from
the crystalline basement. he exploration
and discoveries of the 11 major ields and
one giant ield on the northern lank of
the Dneiper-Donets basin have already
been noted. here are presently deep
drilling exploration projects under way in
Azerbaijan, Tatarstan, and Asian Siberia
directed to testing potential oil and gas
reservoirs in the crystalline basement.
http://www.gasresources.net/index.htm
It appears that, unbeknownst to
Westerners, there have actually been,
for quite some time now, two competing
theories concerning the origins of
petroleum. One theory claims that oil is
an organic 'fossil fuel' deposited in inite
quantities near the planet's surface. he
other theory claims that oil is continuously
generated by natural processes in the
Earth's magma. One theory is backed by
a massive body of research representing
ity years of intense scientiic inquiry.
he other theory is an unproven relic
92
of the eighteenth century. One theory
anticipates deep oil reserves, reillable oil
ields, migratory oil systems, deep sources
of generation, and the spontaneous
venting of gas and oil. he other theory
has a diicult time explaining any such
documented phenomena.
So which theory have we in the West, in
our ininite wisdom, chosen to embrace?
Why, the fundamentally absurd 'Fossil
Fuel' theory, of course – the same theory
that the 'Peak Oil' doomsday warnings are
based on.
I am sorry to report here, by the way,
that in doing my homework, I never did
come across any of that "hard science"
documenting 'Peak Oil' that Mr. Strahl
referred to. All the 'Peak Oil' literature
that I found, on Ruppert's site and
elsewhere, assumed that petroleum is a
non-renewable 'fossil fuel.' hat theory is
never questioned, nor is any efort made
to validate it. It is simply taken to be an
established scientiic fact, which it quite
obviously is not.
So what do Ruppert and his resident
experts have to say about all of this? Dale
Allen Pfeifer, identiied as the "FTW
Contributing Editor for Energy," has
written: "here is some speculation that
oil is abiotic in origin – generally asserting
that oil is formed from magma instead of
an organic origin. hese ideas are really
groundless."
(http://www.fromthewilderness.com)
Here is a question that I have for both
Mr. Ruppert and Mr. Pfeifer: Do you
consider it honest, responsible journalism
to dismiss a ity year body of multi-
disciplinary scientiic research, conducted
by hundreds of the world's most gited
scientists, as "some speculation"?
Another of FTW's prognosticators, Colin
Campbell, is described by Ruppert as
"perhaps the world's foremost expert
on oil." He was asked by Ruppert, in an
interview, "what would you say to the
people who insist that oil is created from
magma?" his is not really meant as a
question at all, but rather as a statement,
as in "there is really nothing you can say
that will satisfy these nutcases who insist
on bringing up these loony theories."
http://www.fromthewilderness.com
Campbell's response to the question was
an interesting one: "No one in the industry
gives the slightest credence to these
theories." Why, one wonders, did Mr.
Campbell choose to answer the question
on behalf of the petroleum industry? And
does it come as a surprise to anyone that
the petroleum industry doesn't want to
acknowledge abiotic theories of petroleum
origins? Should we have instead expected
something along these lines:
"Hey, everybody ... uhhh ... you know how
we always talked about oil being a fossil
fuel? And ... uhmm ... you know how the
entire proit structure of our little industry
here is built upon the presumption that
oil is a non-renewable, and therefore very
valuable, resource?
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr52.html#note*
And remember all those times we talked
about shortages so that we could gouge
you at the pumps? Well ... guess what,
America? You've been Punk'd!"
For the sake of accuracy, I think we need to
modify Mr. Campbell's response, because
it should probably read: “No one in the
petroleum industry will publicly admit
giving any credence to abiotic theories.”
But is there really any doubt that those who
own and control the oil industry are well
aware of the true origins of oil? How could
they not be? Surely there must be a reason
why there appears to be so little interest in
understanding the nature and origins of
such a valuable, and allegedly vanishing,
resource. And that reason can only be
that the answers are already known. he
objective, of course, is to ensure that the
rest of us don't ind those answers.
Why else would we be encouraged, for
decades, to cling tenaciously to a scientiic
theory that can't begin to explain the
available scientiic evidence? And why else
would a half-century of research never see
the light of day in Western scientiic and
academic circles?
Maintaining the myth of scarcity, you see,
is all important. Without it, the house of
cards comes tumbling down. And yet,
even while striving to preserve that myth,
the petroleum industry will continue to
provide the oil and gas needed to maintain
a modern industrial infrastructure,
long past the time when we should have
run out of oil. And needless to say, the
petroleum industry will also continue to
reap the enormous proits that come with
the myth of scarcity.
How will that diicult balancing act be
performed? hat is where, it appears, the
'limited hangout' concerning abiotic oil
will come into play.
Perhaps the most telling quote to emerge
from all of this came from Roger Sassen,
identiied as the deputy director of
Resource Geosciences, a research group
out of Texas A&M University: "he
potential that inorganic hydrocarbons,
especially methane and a few other
gasses, might exist at enormous depth in
the crust is an idea that could use a little
more discussion. However, not from
people who take theories to the point of
absurdity. his is an idea that needs to
be looked into at some point as we start
running out of energy. But no one who is
objective discusses the issue at this time."
he key point there (aside from Sassen's
malicious characterization of Kenney)
is his assertion that no one is discussing
abiotic oil at this time. And why is
that? Because, you see, we irst have to
go through the charade of pretending
“All the 'Peak Oil' literature
that I found, on Ruppert's
site and elsewhere, assumed
that petroleum is a non-
renewable 'fossil fuel.' hat
theory is never questioned,
nor is any efort made to
validate it. It is simply taken
to be an established scientiic
fact, which it quite obviously
is not.”
that the world has just about run out of
'conventional' oil reserves, thus justifying
massive price hikes, which will further
pad the already obscenely high proits of
the oil industry. Only then will it be fully
acknowledged that there is, you know,
that 'other' oil.
"We seem to have plum run out of that
fossil fuel that y'all liked so much, but if
you want us to, we could probably ind
you some mighty ine inorganic stuf. You
probably won't even notice the diference.
he only reason that we didn't mention
it before is that – and may God strike me
dead if I'm lying – it is a lot more work for
us to get to it. So ater we charged you up
the wazoo for the 'last' of the 'conventional'
oil, we're now gonna have to charge you
even more for this really 'special' oil. And
with any luck at all, none of you will catch
on that it's really the same oil."
And that, dear readers, is how I see this
little game playing out. Will you be playing
93
along?
Is Peak Oil Linked to 9/11?
A few inal comments are in order
here about 'Peak Oil' and the attacks of
September 11, 2001, which Mike Ruppert
has repeatedly claimed are closely linked.
In a recent posting, he bemoaned the fact
that activists are willing to "do anything
but accept the obvious reality that for the
US government to have facilitated and
orchestrated the attacks of 9/11, something
really, really bad must be going on." hat
something really, really bad, of course, is
'Peak Oil.' (http://www.fromthewilderness.com)
To demonstrate the dubious nature of
that statement, all one need do is make
a couple of quick substitutions, so that
it reads: "for the German government to
have facilitated and orchestrated the attack
on the Reichstag, something really, really
bad must have been going on." Or, if you
are the type that bristles at comparisons
of Bush to Hitler, try this one: "For the
US government to have facilitated and
orchestrated the attack on the USS Maine,
something really, really bad must have
been going on."
he reality is that the attacks of
September 11, and the post-September
11 military ventures, cannot possibly be
manifestations of 'Peak Oil' because the
entire concept of "Peak Oil” is meaningless
if oil is not a inite resource.
I am not saying, however, that oil and gas
were not key factors behind the military
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. he
distinction that I am making is that it is
not about need (case in point: there is
certainly nothing in Haiti that we need).
It is, as always, about greed. Greed and
control – control of the output of oil ields
that will continue to yield oil long ater
reserves should have run dry.
here is a close parallel here with the
diamond industry. It is a relatively open
secret that the diamond market is an
artiicial one, created by an illusion of
scarcity actively cultivated by DeBeers,
which has monopolized the diamond
industry for generations. As Ernest
Oppenheimer of DeBeers said, nearly
a century ago, "Common sense tells us
that the only way to increase the value of
diamonds is to make them scarce – that
is, reduce production." And that is exactly
what the company has done for decades
now.
here are reportedly nearly one billion
diamonds produced every year, and that is
only a fraction of what could be produced.
Diamonds are not, conventional wisdom
to the contrary, a scarce resource, and they
are therefore not intrinsically valuable.
Without the market manipulation, experts
estimate that the true value of diamonds
would be roughly $30 per carat.
Interestingly enough, Soviet researchers
have noted that diamonds are the result of
the same processes that create petroleum:
"Statistical thermodynamic analysis has
established clearly that hydrocarbon
molecules which comprise petroleum
require very high pressures for their
spontaneous formation, comparable to
the pressures required for the same of
diamond. In that sense, hydrocarbon
molecules are the high-pressure
polymorphs of the reduced carbon system
as is diamond of elemental carbon."
(Emmanuil B. Chekaliuk, 1968)
So what we appear to have here are two
resources, both of which are created
in abundance by natural geothermal
processes, and both of which are marketed
as scarce and valuable commodities,
creating two industries awash in obscene
proits.
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr52.html#diamonds
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/index.htm
heories of Abiogenic oil did not start
exclusively in the Peoples Republic of
Stalin circa 1946. But Soviet research
certainly massively advanced the inorganic
oil thesis whilst Western science largely
ignored it. In fact, many western geo-
scientists are aware of the thesis – we were
taught the basics at University College
London in 1965.
he subject is not well funded in the West
and thus poorly disseminated in our
scientiic literature – largely due to deeply
instilled negative views in the western
oil industry geo-scientiic community
– probably created by Rockerfeller Big
Oil "peer" pressure. Oil is in tight supply
because of limited exploration expenditure
AND similarly low level expenditures on
oil ield and reinery development over
the last 20 years – NOT because we have
no more giant ields. But nonetheless it IS
in tight supply.
Read about the “Peak Oil” scam and lots voice, "there are no automobiles being
more TOTALLY UNCENSORED NEWS on tested here and there never have been."
>>>> www.rense.com
The conspiracy
TO SUPPRESS
"free energy"
(and other non-polluting
technologies)
Time magazine (Australia) 17 July
1995 (p.46) reported on the future
technologies that are going to "severely
change the world" as we know it. hey
correctly pointed out that a change in the
usage of energy would have a massive
impact, but then promise that "the irst
company to design an afordable car that
doesn't foul the atmosphere will race past
its competitors."
Not only are they totally wrong, but
they're probably lying. he simple fact is
that non-polluting technology has been
with us for most of this past century.
It's just that it wouldn't be economically
rational for the oil companies and others
who beneit from the status quo to allow
it to go to market.
My story begins late one night a few
years ago, while driving home. I had
been listening to talk-back radio, when
somebody piped up that they'd been
working on a solar-powered car out at
the local airport, and it was ready to go
and as cheap and as safe as an average
family car – except that you would only
need about ive dollars worth of fuel per
year to get it started. he startled D.J.
then asked when were we likely to see
it in the market place, and the engineer
coolly replied "probably never, I'd say the
oil companies will buy us out in a lash."
I nearly crashed my car – what on earth
was going on here? he next day I rang
the airport to ind out who was doing the
testing only to ind out from an assertive
However, this dead end proved to be the
event that sparked my determination to
94
by Christopher Walter
investigate this issue seriously.
he next encounter was about a year
later involving a friend who knew a guy
who invented a lawn mower that ran on
water. Sceptical but excited, I said I
wanted to meet the man and she came
back a few days later quite upset to ind
he'd recently opened his front door to
a shot gun blast in the face. he dead
inventor had been solidly drinking for
the past six months since he came home
with a million or so dollars and word to
the family that he didn't want to discuss
his engines again. O.K. – while that one
seemed weird; I still needed more.
More came in the form of an article
in the Melbourne Age (13/7/93 p.5)
introducing the "ozone safe induction"
system, a little black box that was
added to your engine that cut fuel usage
by up to two-thirds with a corresponding
reduction in pollution.
Oz Smart Technologies was the name of
the irm, and Mike Holland the inventor
that I talked to about his supposed
breakthrough. "Yeah, the U.S. military
just lew out some Generals and stuf
and they want to buy it, and Nissan
just ofered me ive million dollars but
I want to develop it in Australia." Yeah
but, does it work? Apparently it did. he
E.P.A. told him (of the record) that it
was the best design of its kind they'd
ever seen. A bunch of techies from
Swinburne University who'd done all the
testing, were similarly impressed but the
media continued to consider the device
a bit of a hoax and the company simply
does not exist anymore – yep they just
disappeared (again).
My research today tells me that Mike
Holland's invention was probably of the
"improved fuel eiciency" variety simply
burning fuel in a more eicient
manner, nothing terribly diicult. Other
well known developments are of the
"car running on water" kind, usually
involving electrical current running
through the water to extract and then
burn the hydrogen. Some of the more
interesting involve the use of magnets,
sometimes tuned to exact frequencies
that take energy from the ambient
atmosphere.
Since meeting Mike Holland I have
managed to collect quite a list of energy
inventions that have somehow avoided
being utilised in the market place. You
may not believe they all work, but it
would be very diicult to claim that
all of them are fabrications. I challenge
you to read the evidence is here and
decide for yourself.
HYdRoGEn PoWER
Yull Brown – from Sydney Australia
developed a method of extracting
hydrogen from water in 1978 and
utilising it as a car fuel and fuel for
welders. Ater much publicity (see
he Bulletin (Aust) Aug 22, 1989) he
had managed to raise over 2 million
dollars but has failed to fully develop his
invention.
Francisco Pacheco – an inventor from
Bolivia created the "Pacheco Bi-Polar
Auto-electric Hydrogen Generator"
(US PAT #5,089,107) which separates
hydrogen from seawater. He has built
successful prototypes that have fueled
a car, a motorcycle, a lawn mower, a
torch, a boat, and most recently in
1990 he energised an entire home in
West Milford. Ater many conferences
(including U.N.) and public exhibitions
proving the invention’s worth, the wider
community is still unable to utilise this
technology.
Edward Estevel – from Spain developed
a classic 'water to auto engine' system in
the late 1960s extracting the hydrogen
out of water to use as fuel. his system
was highly heralded, then sank among
other such 'high hope' hydrogen systems
amid rumours of foul play.
Sam Leach – of Los Angeles developed
a revolutionary hydrogen extraction
process during the mid seventies. he
unit easily extracted free hydrogen
from water and was small enough to
it under the hood of automobiles. In
1976 two independent labs in LA tested
this generator with perfect results. Mr
M.J. Mirkin who began the Budget car
rental system purchased the rights to the
device from the inventor who was said
to be very concerned about his personal
security.
Roger Billings – of Provo, Utah headed
a group of inventors that developed a
system converting ordinary cars to run
on Hydrogen. Instead of using heavy
hydrogen tanks, he used metal alloys
called hydrides, to store vast amounts
of hydrogen. When hot exhaust gases
passed through these hydride containers
it released the gas to burn in the
standard engines. Billings estimated the
conversion would cost around US$500
and greatly improve fuel consumption.
Archie Blue – an inventor from
Christchurch, New Zealand developed
a car that runs purely on water by the
extraction of hydrogen. Archie Blue was
reported to have been ofered millions
of dollars by “Arab Interests”. Whether
he received any money or not is unclear.
However despite successful testing of his
95
device by the Automobile Association
in the UK Archie Blue’s invention was
never commercialised.
ElECTRIC EnGInES
Wayne Henthron – from Los Angeles
built an "Electromatic Auto" in 1976 that
managed to regenerate its own electricity.
In normal stop and go driving it gave
several hundred miles of service between
recharges. he system worked by wiring
the batteries to act as capacitors once
the car was moving along with four
standard auto alternators acting to keep
the batteries charged. With little oicial
interest in his system the inventor
resolved to make the car available to the
public to do so, is now involved with
the World Federation of Science and
Engineering – 15532 Computer Lane,
Huntington Beach, CA, 92649, USA.
Joseph R. Zubris – developed in 1969 an
electric car circuit design (US PAT
#3,809,978) that he estimated cost him
$100 a year to operate. Using an old
ten horse power electric truck motor,
he worked out a unique system to get
peak performance from his old 1961
Mercury engine that he ran from this
power plant. he device actually cut
energy drain on electric car starting by
75%, and by weakening excitation ater
getting started, produced a 100% mileage
gain over conventional electric motors.
he inventor was shocked to ind the
lack of reaction from larger business
interests, and so in the early seventies
began selling licenses to interested
smaller concerns for $500. Last known
address was Zubris Electrical Company,
1320 Dorchester Ave, Boston, Ma, 02122,
USA.
Richard Diggs – developed at an
inventors workshop (I.W. international)
his "Liquid Electricity Engine" that he
believed could power a large truck for
25,000 miles from a single portable unit
of his electrical fuel. Liquid electricity
violated a number of the well known
physical laws. he inventor was also
aware of the profound impact the
invention could have upon the world's
economy – if it could be developed.
B. Von Platen – a 65 year old Swedish
inventor made a major breakthrough in
the ield of thermo-electric engines with
his "Hot and Cold Engine" – based
on the fact that wires of diferent
metals produce electricity if they are
joined and heated, the inventor’s secret
breakthrough is said to give more than
30% more eiciency than regular motors,
and with a radioactive isotope for power
(hmmm?!) it could be completely free
from fossil fuels. Volvo of Sweden
bought the rights to this in 1975.
STEam EnGInES
Oliver Yunick – developed a super
eicient steam engine in 1970 (Popular
Science Dec.1970) able to compete
admirably with combustion engines.
DuPont Laboratories – built one of the
most advanced steam engines in late
1971 using a recyclable luid of the freon
family. It is assumed to contain no need
for an external condensor, valves, or
tubes. (Popular Science Jan 1972)
William Bolon – from Rialto, California,
developed an unusual steam engine
design in 1971, that was said to get up
to 50 miles to the gallon. he engine
used only 17 moving parts and weighed
less than 50 pounds and eliminated
the usual transmission and drive train
in an automatic. Ater much publicity,
the inventor’s factory was ire bombed
with damages totaling $600,000. Letters
to the White House were ignored so
the inventor inally gave up and let
Indonesian interests have the design.
aIR PoWER maGnETIC EnERGY
Roy J. Meyers – from LA built an air John W. Keeley – developed a car in the
powered car in 1931. (Air has been used 1920s using principles similar to Nikola
for years to power localised underground Tesla's, drawing harmonic magnetic
mine engines.) Myers, an engineer, energies from the planet itself.
built a 114lb, 6 cylinder radial air engine he electric car ran from high frequency
that produced over 180 HP. Newspaper electricity that was received when
articles at the time reported that the he simply broadcast the re-radiated
vehicle could cruise several hundred atmospheric energy from a unit on his
miles at low speeds. house roof. GM and the other Detroit oil
"powers" ofered the inventor 35 million
Vittorio Sorgato – of Milan, Italy also dollars which was turned down when
created a very impressive air powered they would not guarantee to market the
vehicle in the 70s using compressed air engine. Henry Ford later bought and
stored as a liquid. Ater a great deal of then shelved the invention.
initial interest from Italian sources his
invention is now all but forgotten. Harold Adams – of Lake Isabella,
California, worked out a motor
Robert Alexander – from Montebello, thought to be similar to Keeley's. It was
Ca. spent 45 days and around $500 to demonstrated publicly, including to
put together a car (US PAT #3913004) Naval scientists, around the late 1940s
based on a small 7/8ths 12 v-motor that before it "disappeared" from our history.
provided the initial power. Once going,
a hydraulic and air system took over Dr Keith E. Kenyon – of Van Nuys,
and recharged the small electric energy California discovered a discrepancy in
drain. he inventor and his partner were long accepted laws relating to electric
determined that motor magnets, and so built a radically
the auto industry diferent motor that could theoretically
would not bury run a car on a very small amount of
their "super power" electrical current. When demonstrated
system. To no avail. to physicists and engineers in 1976
those present admitted that it worked
Joseph P Troyan remarkably well but because it was
– designed an air beyond the 'accepted' laws of physics
powered lywheel they chose to ignore it.
that could propel
an automobile for Bob Teal – of Madison, Florida was a
2c a mile. Using a retired electronics engineer when he
principle of "ratio invented his Magna-Pulsion Engine
ampliication of which ran by means of six tiny
motion" in a closed electromagnets and a secret timing
system, the Troyan device. Requiring no fuel, the engine
motor (US PAT emitted no gases. It was so simple in
# 040011) was design it required very little
easily attached to maintanence and a small motorcycle
electric generators battery was enough power to get it
for pollution-free started. he engine has been met with
variable power little else but skepticism.
systems.
Lester J. Hendershot – built his
David McClintock Hendershot Generator in the late 1920s
– created his free largely through trial and error. He wove
energy device together a number of lat coils of
known as the wire and placed stainless steel rings,
"McClintock Air sticks of carbon and permanent magnets
Motor" (US PAT in various positions as an experiment. To
#2,982,26100) which his surprise it actually produced current.
is a cross between a he generator raised considerable
diesel engine with attention at the time.
three cylinders with a compression ratio
of 27 to 1, and a rotary engine with solar Howard Johnson – developed a motor
and plenary gears. It burns no fuel, but in which the power is generated purely
becomes self-running by driving its own by magnetism. It took six years of
air compressor. legal hassles to patent his design (US
96
PAT #4,151,431). More information
is available from the "Permanent
Magnet Research Institute" P.O. Box
199, Blacksburg, Virginia 24063. He is
currently ofering licensing rights.
Edwin V. Gray – developed in the early
seventies an engine that uses no fuel
and produces no waste, he engine that
runs itself is U.S. Pat #3,890,548.
PETRolEum addITIVES
Guido Franch – from Michigan
U.S.A. began demonstrating in the mid
seventies his "water-to-gas miracle" a
fuel he created by adding to water a
small quantity of "conversion powder"
which was easily processed from coal. He
claimed it could be processed for a few
cents per gallon if mass produced. he
fuel was tested by Chemists at Havoline
Chemical of Michigan and the local
University, and both concluded it worked
more eiciently than gasoline. Franch
continued to put on demonstrations for
years but said the auto manufacturers,
US Government, and private
companies just weren't interested in his
revolutionary fuel.
Dr Alfred R. Globus – working for
United International Research developed
a hydro-fuel mixture around the mid-
seventies. he fuel was a mixture of 45%
gasoline, 50% or more of water, and
small percentages of United's "Hydrelate"
which acted as a bonding agent. It was
estimated that a hundred million gallons
of fuel could be saved per day if this fuel
were utilised but alas nobody seemed
interested.
John Andrews – a Portuguese chemist
who in 1974 developed a fuel additive
that enabled ordinary gasoline to be
mixed with water reducing fuel costs
down to 2c a gallon. Ater witnessing
a demonstration of the substance,
impressed Navy oicials planned to
negotiate for the formula. However,
they found the inventor missing and his
lab ransacked.
Mavrin D. Martin - from the University
of Arizona developed in 1977 a
“fuelreformer" catalytic reactor that was
estimated to double mileage. he device
was designed to cut exhaust emissions by
mixing water with Hydro-carbon fuels to
produce an eicient Hydrogen, Methane,
Carbon-Monoxide fuel.
FuEl EFFICIEnCY
Edward La Force - from Vermont
U.S.A. with his brother Robert, designed
a highly eicient engine that burnt all
the usually wasted heavier gasoline
molecules. he'Los Angeles Examiner'
(Dec. 29, 1974) reported that the cams,
timing and so on were altered on stock
Detroit engines. hese modiications not
only eliminated most of the pollution
from the motor but by completely
burning all the fuel, the mileage was
usually doubled. Ater much publicity
the US EPA examined the cars and
found the motor designs were not
good enough. However, few people
believed the EPA including a number of
senators who brought up the matter in
a congressional hearing in March 1975.
he result was still silence.
Eric Cottell – was one of the pioneers
of ultrasonic fuel systems. his involved
using sonic transducers to 'vibrate'
existing fuels down to much smaller
particles, making combustion up to
20% more eicient. Cottell then went
on to discover that super ine S-ionised
water could be mixed perfectly with up
to 70% oil or gas in these systems, this
was followed by much publicity (e.g.
Newsweek, June 17,1974) and then, once
again – silence.
L. Mills Beam – had his super-mileage
carburetor bought out in the 1920s.
In the late 60s he worked out a catalytic
vegetable compound that produced the
same super mileage results. In principle
it was nothing more than a method of
using the hot exhaust gases of an engine
to vapourise the liquid gas being burned.
By rearranging the molecules of gas
and diesel, he was able to triple mileage
rates, while obtaining better combustion,
mileage and emission control. He was
refused and rejected by U.S. State and
Federal Air Pollution and Environmental
Pollution agencies and was inally forced
to sell his formula abroad in the mid-
seventies just to survive.
John W. Gulley – of Gratz, Kentucky,
USA managed 115 mpg from his
eight cylinder Buick using a similar
vapourising method as that employed
by L.M. Beam. "Detroit interests" bought
and suppressed the device in 1950.
SHELL research of London – produced
a 'Vapipe' unit in the early seventies
that also vapourised the petroleum at
around 40 degrees centigrade, and used
a sophisticated pressure loss reduction
97
system, but alas was not marketed
because it "did not meet Federal
emission standards".
Russell Bourke – designed an engine
in 1932 with only two moving parts.
He connected two pistons to a reined
"Scotch Yoke" crankshat and came up
with an engine that was superior in most
respects to any competitive engine. His
design burned any cheap carbon based
fuel and delivered great mileage and
performance. Article ater article was
published acclaiming his engine but once
again, to no avail. he Bourke Engine
Documentary is the revealing book the
inventor assembled just before his death.
nEW FuElS
Clayton J. Querles – from Lucerne
Valley, California took a 10,000 mile trip
across the country in his 1949 Buick
on $10 worth of carbide by building a
simple carbide generator which worked
like a miner's lamp. He claimed that
half a pound of acetylene pressure was
suicient to keep his car running, but
because acetylene was dangerous, he put
a safety valve on his generator and ran
the outlet gas through water to ensure
there would be no 'blow back'. he
inventor also toyed successfully with
methods of fuel vapourisation. (see Sun-
Telegram 11/2/74.)
Joseph Papp – built the highly regarded
Papp engine in the 60s that could run on
a 15 cents an hour secret combination
of expandable gases. Instead of burning
fuel, this engine used electricity to
expand the gas in hermetically sealed
cylinders. he irst prototype was
a simple ninety horsepower Volvo
engine with upper end modiications.
Attaching the Volvo pistons to pistons
itting the sealed cylinders, the engine
worked perfectly with an output of three
hundred horsepower. he inventor
claimed it would cost about twenty ive
dollars to charge each cylinder every
sixty thousand miles. he idea has
gotten nowhere amid accusations of
suppression by the media.
Jean Chambrin – an engineer in
Paris ran his private cars on a mixture
of denatured alcohol and water. he
inventor/mechanical engineer claimed
his motor design could be mass
produced at a fraction of the cost of
present engines. He received nothing
but publicity that led him to take great
precautions in regard to his personal
security.
 From Popular Mechanics, 1952
Imagine how easy it would be to use this parabolic solar heater to instantly Carburettor and Ford signed agreements
super-heat water to drive a turbine to create our electricity. to manufacture the design in 1974,
CaRbuRETToRS
G.A. Moore – one of the most
productive inventors of carburettors,
held some 1,700 patents of which 250
were related to the automobile and its
carburation. While industry today relies
on his air brakes and fuel injection
systems, it continues to completely
ignore his systems for reducing pollution,
gaining more mileage and improving
overall engine eiciency. More info from
he Works of George Arlington Moore
published by the Madison Company. (See
US PAT #'s 1,633,791 to 2,123,485 for 17
interesting developments.)
Joseph Bascle – created the Bascle
carburetor in the mid 50s. he
carburettor raised mileage by 25% and
reduced pollution by 45%. Its inventor,
a well known Baton Rouge researcher,
remodiied every carburetor in the local
Yellow Cab leet, shortly ater his arrival
there.
Kendig Carburettors – were originally
hand made for racing cars by a small
group of mechanics in Los Angeles in the
early seventies under the title of Variable AND OTHER DISCOVERIES edited by
Venturi Carburettors. Eventually a
young college student bought one of
their less sophisticated prototypes for
his old Mercury "gas hog" and entered
it in a Californian air pollution run. He
98
won easily – not only did the carburetor
reduce pollution, it gave almost twice
the mileage. Within a week the student
was told to remove the carburetor as it
was not approved by the Air Resources
Board. he simpler Kendig model was
due for production in 1975 but was never
produced.
C.N. Pogue – from Winnipeg, Canada,
developed a carburetor (US PAT#
2,026,789) in the late 1930s that used
superheated steam in its system and
managed at least 200 miles per gallon.
Much local interest, including threats
from professional thieves, was not
enough publicity to see this invention
through to the market place.
John R. Fish – developed his "Fish"
carburetor in the early 1940s. It was
tested by Ford who admitted that the
invention was a third more eicient
than their own. he design can also be
easily switched to alcohol. Nevertheless
the inventor was hindered from
manufacture and distribution in almost
every possible way. He once even resorted
to selling by mail order, only to be
stopped by the Post Oice. he device
can be currently bought from "Fuel
systems of America" Box 9333, Tarcoma,
Washington 98401 - U.S.ph:(206)
922-2228. (US PAT's 2,214,273 and
2,236,595 and 2,775,818.)
he Dresserator – was created around
the early 70s in Santa Ana, California
by Lester Berriman. It was based on a
super-accurate mixture control using
greatly enhanced airlow, and could run
a car on up to a 22-to-1 fuel mixture.
Test cars passed the pollution control
standards with ease and managed up to
an 18% mileage gain. Although Holley
nothing has been heard of it since.
Mark J. Meierbachtol – from San
Bernardino, California patented a
carburetor ( U.S. Patent # 3,432,281
March, 11, 69) that managed signiicantly
greater mileage than was usual.
Much of this list is borrowed heavily from
the book SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS
Jonathan Eisen, Penguin, NY, 1999.
 B O O K E XC E R P T
The Final Pollution
Dr Robert Anderson
“Ye shall Know the Truth and the Truth
will make you Mad.”
– Aldous Huxley
“False material, when internalised,
blocks thought and inquiry and
produces a barrier to the acceptance of
real knowledge. It drastically reduces
critical reasoning on the part of the
citizen. Beliefs cannot be maintained in
a reasoning environment. his absence
of reasoning translates to public tolerance
and support for, not just the myths, lies
and stupidities, but the systems that
spawn them.”
– Everett E Allie, he Pathology of
Cultural Delusion
Truth
Truth has always been subversive. If this
were not the case, governments would
not go to such extreme lengths to hide
it. As George Orwell put it: “During
times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.”
Nowhere is this truth more evident
than in the area of genetic engineering
biotechnology. Many scientists, starting
out on pure research, have found
themselves entangled in the economic
potential of their research. Good science,
driven by honesty and concern for the
common good, has been appropriated by
corporate greed and media manipulation.
Scientists whose views happen to be
uncomfortable to the viewpoints of
an industry or government have been
denigrated.
Today, speaking out on genetic
engineering is more oten than not career
suicide for scientists.
GE technology has brought GE foods,
mice growing human ears, grass that
barely grows, ish many times their
natural size, drugs, pharmaceuticals and
industrial chemicals produced in food
crops, medical therapies and even the
potential to ‘engineer’ our children.
he myth of co-existence
It is now well documented that co-
existence between GE crops, and
conventional or organic crops, is
impossible. In the huge acreages that
separate Canadian transgenic crops from
their conventional counterparts, cross-
contamination is well established. UK
government-commissioned ield trials
of GE crops showed that many of those
tested were not only dangerous to wild-
life, but detrimental to the environment.
he inevitable result of growing GE
crops is the loss of livelihood for
any conventional or organic farmer
whose neighbour decides to plant
transgenic varieties. here are major
weed and contamination problems
for countries that grow transgenic
crops… Clean-up costs are prohibitive.
Insurance companies have refused
cover for damages. Investment in GE
biotechnology has proven expensive,
environmentally and inancially, and may
come to incur even higher costs.
At a 1999 biotech conference, the
public relations irm, Arthur Anderson
Consulting group, explained how they
created a plan for Monsanto… that,
in time, agriculture would become
dominated by Monsanto products and
natural seeds would become extinct.
Medicine and GE technology
Looking at products in the ield of
therapeutics in 1996, the medical journal,
he Lancet, commented that there was
“very little to show for much investment.”
he two best-known products of the
99
new technology – human insulin and
interferon – have failed expectations, the
former causing a wave of hypoglycaemic
episodes when it was introduced, and the
latter proving of marginal therapeutic
value in a wide range of conditions… A
group of Canadian diabetics and their
doctors have called for a full public
inquiry into insulin safety, claiming the
newer, GE products are making ill, and
perhaps killing, diabetics… A British
group has also been pushing similar
demands for over a decade.
In the US, an Alzheimer’s vaccine trial
using GE ingredients was stopped
when 12 inoculated volunteers sufered
encephalitis (inlammation of the brain)
and meningoencephalitis (inlammation
of the brain and surrounding
membranes)…
In his critical survey of the “new
genetics,” Dr James LeFanu, a medical
columnist for the UK Daily Telegraph,
noted the contrast between a “relentless
catalogue of failed aspirations” and
a “pervasive belief in its limitless
possibilities.”
A threat to life on earth
he oicial study and report produced
by the British Prime Minister’s Strategy
Unit forecast a doomsday scenario of
families struck down by new allergies and
a land overrun by super weeds if Britain
goes ahead with planting transgenic
crops… “It cannot be taken for granted
that negative impacts from GM crops
or foods would be detected quickly if,
unexpectedly, they were to arise.”
Most governments have become partners
in support of giant transnational
corporations willing to play a deadly
game of evolutionary roulette with the
world’s environment; all this oten in
an attempt by governments to gain so-
called ‘free trade’ with the world’s most
powerful nation, the US.
he ‘poor’ and the ‘starving’
he trans-national corporations talk of
wanting to “feed the starving millions”
when in fact these multimillion dollar
corporations have negligible regard for
the starving millions. his was amply
illustrated by the Oxfam report, Rigged
Rules and Double Standards. It showed
that 128 million people could be lited
out of poverty if trade rules allowed
Africa, Latin America, East Asia and
South Asia to increase their share of
world exports by just one per cent.
Recent attempts by the Bush
administration, to feed GE foods to
starving African countries, demonstrates
that government’s concern for the poor.
heir publicly declared “Eat GE or starve”
dictum epitomises a morally repugnant
attitude towards these problems.
Some years ago, Dr Ismail Serageldin,
former chairman of the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural
Research, cited an eye-opening example
of the biotech industry’s “enthusiasm”
to support the poor... pigs and cassava.
Cassava has been a staple food for over
300 million Africans for centuries. None
of the multinational seed companies
attempted to develop or improve cassava
realising only too well that Africans
would not be able to buy the costly GE
“improved” variety. In other words, it
was not proitable for these companies
to develop improved varieties of cassava.
hen research appeared showing that
cassava was a very useful ingredient for
pig feed. Four multinational companies
immediately poured US$1billion into
research on cassava to improve pig feed.
Deliberate Naiveté
While newspaper pundits continue to
extol the virtues of this revolutionary
science, oten because they have a limited
knowledge of the topic, those at the
cutting edge are worried. Nevertheless,
governments still view independent
scientists’ dismal conclusions about the
dangers of GE with the same hostility
that the tobacco industry showed towards
scientists who came up with the “wrong”
conclusions about lung cancer.
he biotech industry… pouring millions
of dollars into a vast PR machine, is
willing to lie, obfuscate and generally
distort the truth. Unfortunately, the pro
genetic engineering lobby still has the
ear of New Zealand’s current Labour-led
government.
Mexican corn
In November 2001, contamination of
native Mexican corn by transgenes
from engineered corn varieties was
documented in a peer-reviewed paper
published in the journal, Nature. he
study by Drs Ignacio Chapela and David
Quist of the University of California
(Berkeley) preceded similar indings by
scientists at Mexico’s National Institute of
Ecology.
he Chapela-Quist article prompted
an immediate storm of protest. he
industry went so far as to create ictitious
characters to write to journals to write
critical articles and letters about these
scientists and an anonymous e-mail
campaign was launched to attack the
scientists’ paper and their characters. he
main cast comprised one ‘Mary Murphy’
and one ‘Andura Smetacek,’ – revealed
when Greenpeace traced their messages
to a public relations irm, the Bivings
Group of Washington, DC, making clear
who was behind the campaign. Bivings
carries out PR work for the biotech
industry.
George Monbiot wrote in his (UK)
Guardian article, “he Fake Persuaders”,
that Bivings boasts: “We win awards.
Sometimes only the client knows the
precise role we played.” In other words,
sometimes real people have no idea that
they are being managed by fake ones.
he biotech dogma is strongly supported
by the powerful US government,
its export policies and its constant
objections to world trade regulations that
would adversely afect the proits from
GE crops and foods, and by its closest
allies.
Do we know how the corn got into
Mexico to contaminate its many native
varieties? he leading contender turns
out to be the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA). his allows the
US to dump massive amounts of corn on
Mexico, helping to turn that nation into
a net importer of corn where previously
it had been an exporter. hese imports
have included transgenic corn since 1996,
when it was irst grown commercially in
the US. Most of the corn was unmilled,
allowing Mexican campesinos (farmers)
to use it as raw seed.
Even the simple process of trucking the
corn was believed to have played a part in
spreading contamination. A later study
by Mexican government scientists found
the contamination higher in samples
taken from sites close to main arterial
roads.
Corn has been the plant chosen by the
biotech industry as the most efective
to produce non-food products such
as pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines,
industrial chemicals, etc. Contamination
by corn engineered to produce a non-
100
food product, could bring – and has
already brought – seriously damaging
results. he contamination of the US
food chain by the StarLink transgene
shows the nature of this danger.
(StarLink was registered in 1998 and
the registration withdrawn in October
2000 when it was found to have
contaminated food supplies, for which it
was not approved. he US Department
of Agriculture (USDA) found
contamination in nearly 10 percent of the
tests it ran in November 2000.)
What will happen if biopharmaceutical
corn varieties, engineered to produce
‘non-food’ elements, reach Mexico and
cross-pollinate with that nation’s 5,000
traditional varieties of corn?
Genes moving from species to species
Without doubt the most worrying issue
in genetic engineering is that of the
transfer of transgenes by horizontal
gene transfer (HGT) or other means
(e.g. wind, water, insects, vehicles, etc.).
Genes that are spliced into crops have the
ability to spread to other plants.
HGT refers to the transfer of genes
directly from one organism to another
by a process similar to infection. It is
diferent to the normal process of vertical
gene transfer – from parents to ofspring
– that occurs during reproduction.
GE technology bypasses reproduction
altogether by exploiting HGT. Genes
are transferred between unrelated
species that would never interbreed
in nature. For example, human genes
are engineered (transferred) into pigs,
sheep, ish and bacteria; toad genes
into potatoes. Novel genes, alien to a
particular species, can be introduced into
food crops.
Human ingestion of GE foods
Although pro-GE enthusiasts gave
assurances that exchanges between
GE foods and bacteria in the human
gut would not happen, recent research
suggests that it is can occur. his was
conirmed by a study commissioned
by the UK Food Standards Agency
(FSA) and carried out by scientists at
the University of Newcastle. For the
irst time, researchers demonstrated
that genetically engineered DNA from
a genetically engineered food – in this
case soybean in the form of a burger and
a milkshake – found its way into the gut
bacteria of human volunteers, raising
potentially serious health questions. (See
FSA Report on www.foodstandards.gov.
uk.)
he FSA research was the world’s irst
intentional known trial looking at the
efects of the ingestion of transgenic
foods by human volunteers; intentional
because US citizens have been used,
largely unknowingly, as guinea pigs for
over half a decade. GE foods entered
their market place without any public
consultation.
Dr Michael Antonio, senior lecturer in
molecular genetics from King’s College
Medical School, London, commenting
on the results of the study, said: “To
my knowledge they have demonstrated
clearly that you can get GE plant DNA in
the gut bacteria. Everyone used to deny
that this was possible.” He went on to
say there were “lots of inadequacies” in
the research, but that did not take away
the importance of the main indings.
“It suggests that you can get antibiotic
marker genes spreading around the
stomach which would compromise the
therapeutic efectiveness of antibiotics.
hey have shown that this can happen
even at very low levels ater just one
meal.”
Human health, GEOs and safety tests
A recent review by Professor Ian Pryme
and Rolf Lembcke (J. Nutrition and
Health 2003, Vol 17), found only ten
studies on the health efects of GE food
or feed. he researchers found that the
quality of some of the published research
was poor and incomplete, and that there
is very limited peer-reviewed data.
heir report states: “It would seem
apparent that GM food regulation is
currently based on a series of extremely
insuicient guidelines.” More than
half of the studies were carried out in
collaboration with the industry, and
none of those studies found any negative
efects on humans. he independent
studies found “adverse efects” reported,
though not explained, and “that these
efects have all been observed ater
feeding for only 10 to14 days.”
he researchers concluded: “… we feel
that much more scientiic efort and
investigation is necessary before we can
be satisied that eating foods containing
GM material in the long term is not likely
to provoke any form of health problems.
It will be essential to adequately test in a
transparent manner each individual GM
product before its introduction into the
market.” (he full report in on <http://
www.soilassociation.org/>.)
he researchers claim companies using
GE technology refer to about 100 animal
feeding studies as proof of safety. Pryme
and Lembcke say these were designed to
test the commercial value of animal feed,
not safety, and many were duplicates and
not all were published.
he crown jewels of medicine
Most GE crops have antibiotic-resistant
marker genes spliced into them. If
genetic elements from these marker genes
were to enter the human system, as the
FSA experiments showed, then people’s
response to widely used antibiotics
could be seriously compromised. As
New Zealand GP, Bernard Conlon, said,
“Antibiotics are the crown jewels of
medicine. Without their use medicine
would be forced back to the dark ages.”
he results of the FSA research were
described as “insigniicant” by the
government agency, but as “dynamite”
by Friends of the Earth (UK) …
common sense should dictate that
such experiments be repeated and fully
explored, but the UK government has
given no indication of any willingness to
do so.
Trust and truth – and the lack of either
Ater the badly handled BSE crisis and
the foot-and-mouth debacle, the UK
public have a growing, well-justiied fear
of “food iddling” by greedy corporates.
his fear was probably exacerbated by
recent secret moves by a senior pro-GE
scientist to sabotage the career of another
academic who had been sceptical of
GE crops. his pro-GE scientist tried
to get Dr Andrew Stirling of Sussex
University dropped from a research
project by rubbishing his work to the
people funding Stirling’s research project.
However, this dirty trick failed and the
story of the attempt was conveyed to
Stirling.
he attack was one of the most serious
in a bitter public and scientiic dispute
about genetic engineering. Dr Stirling is
an expert on risk assessment at Sussex’s
science research unit and also a member
of Blair’s GE review panel that was put
together in an attempt to allay public
fears. he threat was to “encourage” Dr
Stirling and others to support the use of
GE crops and food. Ater discovering
the attempt to discredit him, Dr Stirling
made the comment that, “his type of
pressure is very corrosive and threatens
to undermine the whole science advice
101
process …he cumulative efect of
attacks… has a hugely detrimental efect
on the scientiic process. Instead of
scientists giving an honest opinion, they
fear to open their mouths…”
his fear has had an accumulative efect
in that it has suppressed open discussion.
An extremely reliable source has
conirmed to the author that many of the
scientists working in the New Zealand
Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) are
concerned at the direction New Zealand
is taking in regard to genetic engineering
technology. hey would like to speak
out, but are expressly forbidden to do so,
restricted by employment contracts or
speciic instructions.
It would seem that humankind has not
learned its lessons from having split
the atom, an event which led to the
nuclear arms build-up and hundreds of
nuclear power plants, any one of which
could become another Chernobyl or
hree Mile Island tragedy. he BSE
debacle, warnings of which were simply
laughed of by the UK government, is
still growing. Could there be a DNA
equivalent to this kind of disaster-about-
to-happen?
GE technology is only one facet
of biotechnology. here is a quiet
revolution happening in gene mapping...
genomics, a facet of biotechnology that
may aid superior crops and animal
breeding. It is far preferable that money
be spent on this more worthwhile
research than the technology of genetic
engineering. Gene mapping is shaping
up to have a far greater and positive
impact on our agriculture. here are
few, if any, downsides, particularly in
terms of public sensitivity, in contrast
with GE technology. In the long term,
there are many potential applications
to the genomic-based approach of crop
improvement. hey could, for example,
open up the prospect of being able to
manipulate some of the most basic
features of our crop plants without
involving GE technology.
Excerpted from he Final Pollution, by Dr
Robert Anderson, available for $24.95, prepaid
from: Dr Robert Anderson, PO Box 8188,
Cherrywood, Tauranga, NZ. Dr Anderson
is a member of Physicians and Scientists for
Responsible Genetics. He has lectured at
tertiary level for 25 years in physics, chemistry,
laboratory technology and nuclear medicine.
He researches and lectures on issues relating to
genetic engineering and the environment.
 G U E S T E D I T O R IA L
Nuclear power is the problem
– not the solution
By Dr. Helen Caldicott
here is a huge propaganda push going
on by the nuclear industry to justify
nuclear power as "the answer" to global-
warming.
In fact some people have suggested
that courses on nuclear science and
engineering be included in tertiary level
institutions in Australia.
I agree. But I would suggest that all the
relevant facts about nuclear power be
taught to students.
For example, there should be mandatory
courses in medical schools on the
dangers associated with the nuclear
fuel cycle. Business students should
examine the true costs associated
with the production of nuclear power.
Engineering students should become
familiar with the profound problems
associated with the storage of long-lived
radioactive waste, the human fallibility
that has created the most serious
nuclear accidents in history and the
ongoing history of near misses and near-
meltdowns in the industry.
At present there are 442 nuclear reactors
in operation around the world. If, as
the nuclear industry suggests, nuclear
power were to replace fossil fuels on a
large scale, it would be necessary to build
2000 large, 1000-megawatt reactors.
Considering that no new nuclear plant
has been ordered in the US since 1978,
this proposal is less than practical.
Furthermore, even if we decided today to
replace all fossil-fuel-generated electricity
with nuclear power, there would only be
enough economically viable uranium to
fuel the reactors for three to four years.
he true economies of the nuclear
industry are never fully accounted for by
proponents of nuclear power. he cost
of uranium enrichment is subsidised
by the US government. he true cost of
the industry's liability in the case of an
accident in the US is estimated to be
$US560billion ($726billion), but the
industry pays only $US9.1billion – 98
percent of the insurance liability is
covered by the US taxpayer. he cost of
decommissioning (shutting down and
dismantling) all the existing US nuclear
reactors is estimated to be $US33billion,
and all nuclear power plants must go
through this process.
hese costs – plus the enormous expense
involved in the storage of radioactive
waste for a quarter of a million years
– are not now included in the economic
assessments of nuclear electricity.
It is also said that nuclear power is
emission-free. he truth is very diferent.
In the US, where much of the world's
uranium is enriched, including
Australia's, the enrichment facility at
Paducah, Kentucky, requires the electrical
output of two 1000-megawatt coal-ired
plants, which emit huge quantities of
carbon dioxide, the gas responsible for 50
percent of global warming.
Also, this enrichment facility and
another at Portsmouth, Ohio, release
from leaky pipes 93 percent of the
chloroluorocarbon gas emitted yearly
in the US. he production and release of
CFC gas is now banned internationally
by the Montreal Protocol because
it is the main culprit responsible for
stratospheric ozone depletion. But CFC
is also a global warmer, 10,000 to 20,000
times more potent than carbon dioxide.
In fact, the nuclear fuel cycle utilises large
quantities of fossil fuel at all of its stages
– the mining and milling of uranium, the
construction of the nuclear reactor and
cooling towers, robotic decommissioning
of the intensely radioactive reactor at
the end of its 20 to 40-year operating
lifetime, and transportation and long-
term storage of massive quantities of
radioactive waste.
In summary, nuclear power produces,
according to a 2004 study by Jan Willem
Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith,
102
only three times fewer greenhouse gases
than modern natural-gas power stations.
Contrary to the nuclear industry's
propaganda, nuclear power is therefore
not green and it is certainly not clean.
Nuclear reactors consistently release
millions of curies of radioactive isotopes
into the air and water each year. hese
releases are unregulated because
the nuclear industry considers these
particular radioactive elements to be
biologically inconsequential. his is not
so.
hese unregulated isotopes include the
noble gases krypton, xenon and argon,
which are fat-soluble and if inhaled by
persons living near a nuclear reactor, are
absorbed through the lungs, migrating
to the fatty tissues of the body, including
the abdominal fat pad and upper thighs,
near the reproductive organs. hese
radioactive elements, which emit
high-energy gamma radiation, can
mutate the genes in the eggs and sperm
and cause genetic disease.
Tritium, another biologically signiicant
gas, is also routinely emitted from
nuclear reactors. Tritium is composed of
three atoms of hydrogen, which combine
with oxygen, forming radioactive water,
which is absorbed through the skin, lungs
and digestive system. It is incorporated
into the DNA molecule, where it is
mutagenic.
he dire subject of massive quantities
of radioactive waste accruing at the 442
nuclear reactors across the world is also
rarely, if ever, addressed by the nuclear
industry. Each typical 1000-megawatt
nuclear reactor manufactures 33 tonnes
of thermally hot, intensely radioactive
waste per year.
Already more than 80,000 tonnes of
highly radioactive waste sits in cooling
pools next to the 103 US nuclear power
plants, awaiting transportation to a
storage facility yet to be found. his
dangerous material will be an attractive
target for terrorist sabotage as it travels
through 39 states on roads and railway
lines for the next 25 years.
But the long-term storage of radioactive
waste continues to pose a problem.
he US Congress in 1987 chose Yucca
Mountain in Nevada, 150km northwest
of Las Vegas, as a repository for
America's high-level waste. But Yucca
Mountain has subsequently been found
to be unsuitable for the long-term
storage of high-level waste because it is
a volcanic mountain made of permeable
pumice stone and it is transected by
32 earthquake faults. Last week a
congressional committee discovered
fabricated data about water iniltration
and cask corrosion in Yucca Mountain
that had been produced by personnel in
the US Geological Survey. hese startling
revelations, according to most experts,
have almost disqualiied Yucca Mountain
as a waste repository, meaning that
the US now has nowhere to deposit its
expanding nuclear waste inventory.
To make matters worse, a study released
last week by the National Academy of
Sciences shows that the cooling pools
at nuclear reactors, which store 10 to
30 times more radioactive material
than that contained in the reactor core,
are vulnerable to catastrophic attacks
by terrorists, which could unleash an
inferno and release massive quantities
of deadly radiation – signiicantly worse
than the radiation released by Chernobyl,
according to some scientists.
his vulnerable high-level nuclear waste
contained in the cooling pools at 103
nuclear power plants in the US includes
hundreds of radioactive elements that
have diferent biological impacts in the
human body, the most important being
cancer and genetic diseases.
he incubation time for cancer is ive to
50 years following exposure to radiation.
It is important to note that children,
old people and immuno-compromised
individuals are many times more
sensitive to the malignant efects of
radiation than other people.
I will describe four of the most dangerous
elements made in nuclear power plants.
Iodine 131, which was released at the
nuclear accidents at Sellaield in Britain,
Chernobyl in Ukraine and hree Mile
Island in the US, is radioactive for only
six weeks and it bio-concentrates in leafy
vegetables and milk. When it enters the
human body via the gut and the lung, it
migrates to the thyroid gland in the neck,
where it can later induce thyroid cancer.
In Belarus more than 2000 children have
had their thyroids removed for thyroid
cancer, a situation never before recorded
in paediatric literature.
Strontium 90 lasts for 600 years. As a
calcium analogue, it concentrates in
cow and goat milk. It accumulates in the
human breast during lactation, and in
bone, where it can later induce breast
cancer, bone cancer and leukemia.
Cesium 137, which also lasts for 600
years, concentrates in the food chain,
particularly meat. On entering the
human body, it locates in muscle, where
it can induce a malignant muscle cancer
called a sarcoma.
Plutonium 239, one of the most
dangerous elements known to humans,
is so toxic that one-millionth of a gram is
carcinogenic. More than 200kg is made
annually in each 1000-megawatt nuclear
103
power plant. Plutonium is handled like
iron in the body, and is therefore stored
in the liver, where it causes liver cancer,
and in the bone, where it can induce
bone cancer and blood malignancies.
On inhalation it causes lung cancer. It
also crosses the placenta, where, like the
drug thalidomide, it can cause severe
congenital deformities. Plutonium has a
predisposition for the testicle, where it
can cause testicular cancer and induce
genetic diseases in future generations.
Plutonium lasts for 500,000 years, living
on to induce cancer and genetic diseases
in future generations of plants, animals
and humans.
Plutonium is also the fuel for nuclear
weapons – only 5kg is necessary to
make a bomb and each reactor makes
more than 200kg per year. herefore any
country with a nuclear power plant can
theoretically manufacture 40 bombs a
year.
Because nuclear power leaves a toxic
legacy to all future generations, because
it produces global warming gases,
because it is far more expensive than
any other form of electricity generation,
and because it can trigger proliferation
of nuclear weapons, these topics need
urgently to be introduced into the
tertiary educational system of Australia,
which is host to 30 per cent to 40 per cent
of the world's richest uranium.
Dr. Helen Caldicott is an anti-nuclear campaigner
and founder and president of the Nuclear Policy
Research Institute, which warns of the danger of
nuclear energy.
 Do you still trust your doctor?

his is an actual ad from a 1950s popular mass market magazine in the US. he purpose of reprinting here is
to remind you that 50 years or so later, doctors are still part of a system more interested in its proits than it is in
your health. In fact, corporate medicine is now the 2nd leading cause of death in this country. As an old Chinese
proverb goes, “Don’t trust the word of anyone who speaks through their wallet.”

104
WHAT YOUR DOCTOR WILL NEVER TELL YOU
Drugs and Doctors May be
the Leading Cause of Death
in U.S. (and New Zealand)
By Joseph Mercola, D.O.
At one time, the main title of my Web
site read: "Doctors are the hird leading reactions (ADRs) and 106,000 (76,000 to
Cause of Death.”
his article, available on my home page,
was widely circulated on the Internet
and was one of the reasons why my Web
site was initially popular.
What you may not realise is that I
am the one who made this analysis
and popularised it. he original study
was published by Dr. Starield, a full
professor of public health at the most
prestigious hospital in the United States,
Johns Hopkins. Her study never had
the headline in it, but instead listed the
published research documenting the
various causes of deaths that doctors
contributed to. I simply added them all
up and compared them to cardiovascular
diseases and cancer and came up with
the above headline, which was widely
circulated on the Internet.
Interestingly, when I contacted Dr.
Starield by e-mail she disagreed with
the headline I had come up with. She
did not feel that doctors were the third
leading cause of death, but thought they
were the number one cause of death
because of their failure to inform their
patients about the truth of health. Now
this might be a bit too harsh as even if
people understand health truth they have
freedom of choice and can choose to use
sugar, soda and drugs (legal and illegal)
to compromise their health and longevity.
JAMA published a study in 2000 that
could support the fact that doctors may
be the leading cause of death in the
United States.
his inding is more of a speculation
though, so below I have provided some
other studies to support this assertion.
• In 1994, an estimated 2,216,000
(1,721,000 to 2,711,000) hospitalised
patients had serious adverse drug
137,000) had fatal ADRs, making these
reactions between the fourth and sixth
leading cause of death.
• Fatal ADRs accounted for 0.32 percent
(95 percent conidence interval(CI), 0.23
percent to 0.41 percent) of hospitalised
patients.
JAMA April 15, 1998;279(15):1200-5
BMC Nephrol. December 22, 2003
• Medication-related problems (MRP)
continue to occur at a high rate in
ambulatory hemodialysis (HD) patients.
• Medication-dosing problems (33.5
percent), adverse drug reactions (20.7
percent), and an indication that was not
currently being treated (13.5 percent)
were the most common MRP.
• 5,373 medication orders were reviewed
and a MRP was identiied every 15.2
medication exposures.
Nurs Times. December 9-15,
2003;99(49):24-5.
• In 2002, 16,176 adverse drug reaction
reports were received, of which 67
percent related to reactions categorised as
‘serious.’
Pharm World Sci. December,
2003;25(6):264-8.
• Medication administration errors
(MAEs) were observed in two
departments of a hospital for 20 days.
• he medication administration error
rate was 14.9 percent. Dose errors were
the most frequent (41 percent) errors,
followed by wrong time (26 percent)
and wrong rate errors. Ten percent of
errors were estimated as potentially
life-threatening, 26 percent potentially
105
signiicant and 64 percent potentially
minor.
Serious and Fatal Drug Reactions in US
Hospitals:
• Drug-related morbidity and mortality
have been estimated to cost more that
$136 billion a year in United States. hese
estimates are higher than the total cost
of cardiovascular care or diabetes care in
the United States. A major component
of these costs is adverse drug reactions
(ADE).
Healthsentinel.com
• he numbers of deaths reported in
data sets varied 34-fold and were up to
several 100-fold less than values based on
extrapolations of surveillance programs.
Am J Med August 1, 2000;109(2):122-30
• About 0.05 percent of all hospital
admissions were certainly or probably
drug-related.
• Incidence igures based on death
certiicates only may seriously
underestimate the true incidence of fatal
adverse drug reactions.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol October,
2002;58(7):479-82
• In one study of 200 patients, ADRs may
have contributed to the deaths of two
(one percent) of patients.
J Clin Pharm her October,
2000;25(5):355-61
• In a survey of over 28,000 patients,
ADRs were considered to be the cause
of 3.4 percent of hospital admissions. Of
these, 187 ADRs were coded as severe.
Gastrointestinal complaints (19 percent)
represented the most common events,
followed by metabolic and haemorrhagic
complications (nine percent). he drugs
most frequently responsible for these
ADRs were diuretics, calcium channel
blockers, nonsteroidal anti-inlammatory
drugs and digoxin.
J Am Geriatr Soc December,
2002;50(12):1962-8
 THE MeNZB CAMPAIGN OF
FEAR – A $200m
SCANDAL
By Jason Sanders

New Zealand is currently involved in the largest mass medical
intervention in its history – an enormous vaccination drive to
have virtually everyone under 20 (1.15 million young people)
injected with three doses of a new meningococcal vaccine - the
MeNZB™. his is ostensibly being done to combat the fearsome
menace of a meningococcal epidemic claimed to be ravaging this
age-group.
policy makers were persuaded to jump-start the vaccination
campaign because of the purported seriousness of the epidemic.
hey had at the time just a rudimentary supposition of MeNZB’s
safety.
Full licensure is only granted for mass medication under Section
21. In other words, the mass campaign IS the test.

Dr. Jane O'Hallahan, the director of the meningococcal vaccine As the campaign has been progressing, the MoH has been issuing
strategy group of the Ministry of Health (MoH), said in a letter to reassuring notices that yes, indeed, just as they thought, the
the Herald (10 Nov. 2004): “adverse reactions” are few and not very serious.

"he almost certain outcome if we don't control the epidemic of
meningococcal B is more deaths and more children and young
people sufering pain, amputations, deafness and intellectual
disabilities."
But is this all true? Or is it an example of a remarkably efective
fear-inducing propaganda campaign that has less to do with
children’s health than it does with the bottom line of a multinational
pharmaceutical corporation and the spin-ofs to its New Zealand
partners in the MoH and the “health professions”?
Unfortunately NZ has a seriously lawed adverse reaction reporting
system, and thanks to that, the vaccine will no doubt be “found to
be safe”. In fact, this “inding” is virtually a foregone conclusion,
according to health oicials in charge of the campaign. In fact,
the NZ public is being massaged on a regular basis by the vaccine
lobby, typiied by statements like this from Dr Jane O’Hallahan:

By manipulating people’s fear you can make them do anything,

as any expert in propaganda will tell you. And so with a steady
stream of statements like O'Hallahan's and constant emotive
reminders of cases like Charlotte Cleverly-Bisman's in the media
spotlight, much of the public has been like putty in their hands,
and readily has given consent for their children to be vaccinated
with a largely untested, unproven – and quite possibly dangerous
– vaccine.*

his campaign has a budget of around $200 million, according to

some government sources. his large expenditure was justiied to
cabinet by the Ministry of Health because “we were in the midst of
a public health emergency which would very likely last another 10
years with an average loss of about 20 lives a year, without the vaccine”.

Some History and Facts

he vaccine MeNZB™ is manufactured in Italy by the transnational
biotechnology corporation "Chiron" (pronounced Ky-ron). It
has provisional licensure in this country under section 23 of the
Medicines Act. Section 23 is for experimental medicines/vaccines
only. his means it hasn't met all safety requirements.

Despite the experimental nature of the vaccine, however, key

106
"Vaccines are one of the most researched and
best understood ields of modern medicine. "Being extremely generous, evidence
here is no contention among scientists or on safety was very thin. Being realistic
doctors about the safety and efectiveness of there were too few patients followed up
the MeNZB meningococcal vaccine.” for insuicient time. hree weeks is not
enough...neither is four weeks."
Or is there?
But according to O'Hallahan et al, 7 days
Jane O’Hallahan’s statement is completely is enough for New Zealand children.
at variance with the hard facts: namely
that the vaccine’s safety and eicacy are in
serious doubt among members of the NZ Safety and Eicacy
scientiic and medical communities.
I will come back to the safety question
later in this article. Let's look now at
In fact, as already noted, Medsafe, the
regulatory body charged with looking whether the vaccine can actually do what
it is supposed to do – prevent invasive
at safety of medicines in New Zealand
refused to grant the MeNZB™ vaccine full meningococcal disease. According to
O'Hallahan and the MoH there is no
licensure. Why?
question of its efectiveness. About 75% of
the people in the
Perhaps it was
because of the fact trial had a “four-
fold increase in
that the clinical Medsafe, the regulatory body antibody levels”
trials neglected to charged with looking at safety
use a real placebo to the epidemic
of medicines in New Zealand strain. his fact
(usually an inert
substance like a refused to grant the MeNZB™ is cited as proof
the vaccine will
saline solution) vaccine full licensure. Why?
for the “control” protect against
meningococcal B The whole subject of immunity and
group. Instead, Perhaps it was because of the disease.
a s t o n i s h i n g l y,
fact that the clinical trials
they used other
vaccines. In
neglected to use a real placebo According
(usually an inert substance to Professor
some cases,
the Norwegian like a saline solution) for the Diana Lennon,
author of the NZ
“parent” vaccine “control” group.
was used and I m m u n i s ation
Handbook (2002),
in others an
unlicensed an authorative
text on vaccination in New Zealand and
meningococcal C vaccine manufactured
by Chiron. principal researcher on the MeNZB vaccine,
the acknowledged scientiic method to
evaluate eicacy (of a meningococcal or
Or perhaps it was because the rudimentary
safety trials conducted in New Zealand other vaccine) is to follow up a very large
group of vaccine recipients for several
involved only about 1600 children and
active follow-up to monitor any "adverse years, measuring their rate of succumbing
to (for example) meningococcal invasive
events" was only 7 days.
disease, and then comparing them to a
control group who didn't get the vaccine.
Honest international experts on safety
of medicines would view 7 days as being his is called a “Phase 3” trial. Only then
can it be found if the experimental vaccine
a worryingly short amount of time to
ascertain whether or not a child is going actually prevents any of its recipients from
developing the strain of meningococcal
to sufer serious long-term consequences.
For example, the pre-licensing trials of invasive disease at which it is targeted.
his is precisely what the Norwegians did
the Measles - Mumps - Rubella (MMR)
triple live virus vaccine conducted in the with their meningococcal vaccine, the so
called “parent vaccine” of the MeNZB™
UK in the late 1980s involved observation
periods of up to a month. Even so, in vaccine, on which the MeNZB vaccine
manufactured by Chiron is modelled.
he Journal of Adverse Reactions (Jan.
2001) a number of senior UK clinicians
were critical of those safety tests. Dr. What happened in Norway?
A. Peter Fletcher of the Medicines
Division of the Dept. of Health (UK) In Norway the Norwegian Institute of
who served as medical assessor to the Public Health trialled the vaccine on
Committee on Safety of Medicines, said, 171,000 adolescents, 80,000 of whom
107
Do antibodies confer
immunity?
"FROM REPEATED medical
investigations, it would seem that
antibodies are about as useful as
a black eye in protecting the victim
from further attacks. The word
"antibody" covers a number of even
less intelligible words, quaint relics
of Erlich’s side-chain theory, which
the greatest of experts, McDonagh,
tells us is "essentially unintelligible".
Now that the old history, mythology
and statistics of vaccination have
been exploded by experience, the
business has to depend more upon
verbal dust thrown in the face of
the lay public. The mere layman,
assailed by antibodies, receptors,
haptophores, etc., is only too pleased
to give up the ight and leave
everything to the experts. This is just
what they want, especially when he
is so pleased that he also leaves
them lots and lots of real money.
antibodies is, however, so extremely
complex and dificult, especially to
the real experts, that it is a relief
to be told that the gaps in their
knowledge of such things are still
enormous.
We can obtain some idea of the
complexity of the subject from
he Integrity of the Human Body, by
Sir Macfarlane Burnet. He calls
attention to the fact – the mystery
– that some children can never
develop any antibodies at all, but
can nevertheless go through a
typical attack of, say, measles,
make a normal recovery and show
the normal continuing resistance to
reinfection. Furthermore, we have
heard for years past of attempts
made to relate the amount of
antibody in patients to their degree
of immunity to infection. The, results
have often been so farcically chaotic,
so entirely unlike what was expected,
that the scandal has had to be
hushed up—or put into a report,
which is much the same thing (vide
M.R.C. Report, No. 272, May 1950,
A Study of Diphtheria in Two Areas
of Great Britain, now out of print).
The worse scandal, however, is that
the radio is still telling the schools
that the purpose of vaccinating is to
produce antibodies. The purpose of
vaccinating is to make money!"
– Lionel Dole

Of crucial interest is the fact that oten 50%
or less of the deaths from meningococcal
disease per annum have been caused by
the so-called "epidemic strain".
received the vaccine. Ater several years
of follow-up they found it too inefective
(the eicacy rate was reported to be 57%)
to be used nationally – something the
New Zealand MoH has been very quiet
about. When the NZ MoH does allude to
the fact that the Norwegians didn’t “roll
out” their vaccine, the say it was because
the epidemic had declined naturally, and
that the vaccine was no longer needed.
hey don’t acknowledge the facts presented
to them by ex-MoH Risk assessor Ron
Law, that the epidemic (such that it was)
has been on a steep deline (75%) here
for the last three years – well before the
vaccine was introduced.
Nikki Turner of the Immunisation
Advisory Centre at the University of
Auckland attributes the poor eicacy
of the Norwegian vaccine (reported by
he Lancet to be 57%) to the fact that
recipients received only two doses. In
a public meeting she stated that the
MeNZB™ vaccine was expected to be
more efective because Kiwi kids will be
receiving 3 doses of the vaccine.
But the truth is no-one knows whether
MeNZB™ will be any more efective
because no similar phase 3 trials on it have
been performed. hey are just guessing
that 3 doses might make it a little more
efective. here is absolutely no scientiic
proof. Moreover, the Norwegian tests were
performed on adolescents only, and not the
infants and young children being given the
MeNZB (TM) vaccine.
his is why the manufacturer of the
vaccine, Chiron, says in the data sheet
that accompanies each vial of MeNZB™
that, “no prospective eicacy trials have
been performed with MeNZB.” It is why
O'Hallahan herself said that, "Roll-out
of the programme will occur knowing
that MeNZB is immunogenic [increases
antibody levels] but without eicacy data."
However, even if the MeNZB™ vaccine
does prove to be efective in preventing
meningococcal disease caused by the
target strain of meningococcal bacteria,
the new vaccine is not expected to prevent
all cases of meningococcal disease. he
reason for this is that there are several
other strains of meningococcal bacteria
– including A, C, W135 and Y serogroups
– against which the MeNZB™ is not
expected to have any eicacy.
Moreover, meningococcal bacteria appear
to have the biological capacity to "outwit"
the vaccines designed to protect against
diferent strains of these organisms.
According to Professor Lennon, writing
in the NZ Immunisation Handbook:
"Meningococci have the capacity to
exchange genes and switch serogroups".
(p. 200).
his means the bug is pleomorphic
(or form-changing) and that B type
meningococcal bacteria has the ability to
change itself into a C or Y type, and vice
versa.
In practice, this feature of meningococcal
bacteria appears to blunt the efectiveness
of vaccination campaigns. What oten
seems to happen is that the health
authorities bring in a vaccine against
one strain of meningococcal bacteria
which successfully reduces cases caused
by that strain. However around the
same total of annual cases of meningitis
in general continues to occur, with the
numbers being made up by an increase in
frequency of cases caused by another of
the plethora of meningococcal strains or
other meningitis causing pathogens.
For instance, an Australian government
bulletin commented on the UK's
experience with a meningococcal C
vaccine campaign in 1999:
"A recent study has shown a 25% increase
in serogroup B [meningococcal B] disease
across all age groups in the United
Kingdom since the [meningoccocal C]
vaccination campaign. his observation
supports a hypothesis that serogroup
replacement (ie. B for C) may be an
important factor in the epidemiology
of meningococcal disease ater the
introduction of new vaccines.
108
It therefore remains to be seen what the
value of meningococcal vaccines will be
in the future control of meningococcal
disease."
A similar phenomenon has been
noted by other medical researchers.
A study published in the prestigious
UK medical journal he Lancet which
looked at pneumococcal infections in
Finnish children, noted how invasive
pneumococccal infections (meningitis)
had sharply increased in the mid 90s. he
authors of the study wrote:
"Hib (Haemophilus inluenzae type B)
vaccinations started in Finland in 1986,
and the last case of invasive disease in
our hospital was seen in 1991. hus
our results suggest that following the
disappearance of invasive Hib disease
in children, bacteraemic pneumococcal
infections have increased. A similar,
although less striking, increase has been
reported in Philadelphia. It is tempting
to speculate that the increase in invasive
pneumococcal infections is causally
related to the disappearance of Hib
disease. It is known that Hib vaccinations
have reduced the carriage of H. inluenzae,
and pneumococci may have found a new
niche in colonising children."(he Lancet,
11 March 1995, Vol.345, p661).
Misuse of Statistics by the
Ministry of Health
In all the press releases and handouts from
the MoH, and amid all the emotive scare-
tactics, there is one hard fact which the
Ministry seems unwilling to divulge: the
epidemic, if we may even term it as such,
has abated.
he epidemic reached it highest levels
between 1995 and 2002, and the 75%
decrease had occurred well before even
1% of the vaccine's target population
received their third shot.
he numbers speak for themselves: In
1997 (from all strains of meningococcal
bacteria) there were 613 cases; 1998 had
440; 1999, 504; 2000, 480; 2001, 650; 2002,
555 ;2003, 549; 2004, 303(prov.). his is
the lowest case load since 1994. Mortality
(from all strains of meningococcal
bacteria) has fallen even more steeply.
he average yearly number of deaths has
been about 17. However, since 2001 with
26 deaths, the worst on record, the death
toll has steadily fallen, reaching 18 deaths
in 2002, 13 in 2003 and only 8 for 2004.
hese are the lowest numbers on record

Why has all the emphasis been
on the vaccine instead of the well
documented factors associated
with increased risk for children
developing meningococcal disease
– such as passive smoking, low levels
of vitamin C, iron deiciency, use of
anti-pyretics, and poor diet?
since the epidemic began in 1991 and
strongly suggests the virulence of the
bacteria is waning, along with the
caseload.
Of crucial interest is the fact that oten
50% or less of those deaths per annum
have been caused by the so-called
"epidemic strain".
In 2002 only 9 out of the 18 deaths were
due to the meningococcal B subtype. In
2003 it was 4/13(31%), and in 2004 it was
4/8. (50%).
Ron Law discovered these facts. He is an
independent Risk and Policy Analyst, and
former advisor to the Ministry of Health.
He scoured through the records, and
did hundred of hours of research siting
through ESR (Environmental Science
and Research Institute) records and
statistics on the so-called meningococcal
"epidemic". he ESR is the oicial body in
charge of collating mortality records.
he Ministry of Health has not been
exactly forthcoming on these highly
pertinent details and perhaps this is why:
Law discovered the shocking news that
in both 2003 and 2004, there were only 2
deaths in each year of under 20 year olds
from meningococcal B!
In my opinion 2 deaths a year (and an
estimated 3-10 cases of survivors with
disabilities; however this is pure guesswork
as the MoH refuses to release the igures)
in under 20 year olds from a strain of
bacteria does not constitute a virulent
epidemic that warrants the declaration
of a public health emergency and a
hugely expensive national vaccination
intervention. In fact it constitutes a bogus
What’s more, Law’s indings completely
undermine the Ministry's justiication
for the campaign which was that
vaccinating under 20 year olds against
the meningococcal B strain would save
200 lives over the next 10 years. his
estimate was falsely based on deaths from
all strains of meningococci (about 17 a
year on average since 1991) although the
MoH seemed to prefer a nice round igure
and predicted 20 per annum.
he fact is that according to “he Top Ten
Report” even during the years 1997-1999
– the middle of this 13 year old “epidemic”
– meningococcal disease (from all strains)
did not even make it into the top ten
causes of death for the 0 to 24 year old age
group!
"he Top Ten Report" (published by
epidemic, a trumped up epidemic with the Waikato District Health Board in
strong overtones of incompetence and 2001) was put together by a large group
ulterior motives. of doctors and paediatricians using data
collected from hospitals, the Institute of
In fact, there has been a gross misuse Environmental Science and Research Ltd
of statistics by our civil servants in (ESR), Statistics New Zealand etc. his
the Ministry of Health. Like I did, you report gathered together extensive hard
probably thought that the vast majority data on causes of death and sickness in the
– if not nearly all – of that igure of 220 late 1990s, in order to enable a prioritising
deaths (since 1991), were due to the of health spending.
"epidemic strain". However, the 220
deaths were from infections from all In his forward to the report Professor
strains of meningococcal disease; the Frank Oberklaid of the Royal Children's
meningococcal B subtype targeted by the Hospital in Melbourne welcomed the
MeNZB™ vaccine has been conirmed as report as a compendium of factual
causing around half of those 220 deaths; evidence which would lay to rest many
about 120 in all. assumptions.
Oicial handouts and He stated that:
MoH websites declared the Law discovered
meningococcal B strain "he expenditure
targeted by the vaccine the in both of large amounts
to be causing over 80% of 2003 and 2004, of money in areas
meningococcal disease cases. that have a direct
It simply isn't so, but no doubt
there were only bearing on people's
it suited their purposes of 2 deaths in each lives are determined
selling this vaccine to the oten by political
year of under 20 considerations rather
government – and to the
public. Actually, the MoH's year olds from than documented
own igures reveal only 49.9% meningococcal B! health status or
of the 4,128 cases since the the needs of the
beginning of 1997 have been population".
conirmed as being due to the
MeNZB™ strain. According to this
comprehensive report meningococcal
Ron Law, who has tried to publicise these disease doesn't rate highly as a cause of
igures, has said: "Using meningococcal death or disease. In fact for the population
type C and type W cases to justify a as a whole, that is, for all ethnic groups
type B vaccine is much worse than in the 0 to 24 age range, it doesn't even
pseudo-science. It would appear to be break into the top ten! And that's from
falsiication of the evidence worthy of a all strains of meningococci. he top ten
full enquiry; some could argue that it is causes of "potentially avoidable mortality"
scientiic fraud." are listed as:
109
Motor vehicle crashes 26%
Suicide 18%
SIDS 11%
Low birthweight babies 8%
Congenital anomalies 7%
Birth trauma & asphyxia 4%
Other perinatal conditions 3%
Drowning 3%
Neural tube defects 3%
Leukaemia 3%
What's more, "he Top Ten Report"
authors found that meningococcal disease
(from all strains) did not even make it into
the top ten causes of hospitalisation for
the 0-24 age group.
Parents who have been made to feel anxious
by this unprecedented government run
scare campaign need to ask themselves a
few questions:
• Am I being duped?
• Why am I not more scared of my child
getting leukaemia? (here would be more
justiication.)
• Why am I more scared of my child
developing meningococcal disease now
than in 2001 when mortality rates from
this illness were 4 times higher? (All
strains.)
Is it that leukaemia, neural tube defects
and other congenital defects and SIDS
keep a much lower proile because there
is no vaccine on the market for these
conditions? Why has all the emphasis
been on the vaccine instead of the well
documented factors associated with
increased risk for children developing
“Information supplied to health professionals on an ongoing
basis by the MoH is biased in favour of vaccination. It oten
omits, downplays or attempts to discredit data that shows
that vaccines are associated with long term adverse efects.”
meningococcal disease – such as passive
smoking, low levels of vitamin C, iron
deiciency, use of anti-pyretics, and poor
diet? Cui Bono?
Side-efects
he oicial view is that there are no
serious side-efects, that the vaccine is
completely safe. Dr Nikki Turner, director
of the Immunisation Advisory Centre
wrote in the Herald recently (Nov. 10 '04),
"Sore arms, fever, nausea and vomiting
are unpleasant and occasional allergic
reactions. However, no child has died
or had any long-term efects from the
meningococcal vaccine." Dr O'Hallahan
in the Herald on the same day called any
assertions that the vaccine was unsafe the
"fallacies and misinformation promulgated
by a small group of activists with an
anti-immunisation agenda". She said all
reported side-efects were temporary.
Unfortunately, the vaccine has been
causing serious side efects, but these
are simply not being given oicial
recognition. To be quite blunt, the whole
system of monitoring of side-efects in
this country is defective from the top to
bottom, being founded on the assumption
that vaccination is safe and efective.
People who adhere to this belief consider
vaccination to be a vital public health
tool. Vaccine side efects are dismissed as
being mostly short term, nuisance value
symptoms (and easily justiied by the
protection conferred by the vaccine against
more serious disease.) Serious side efects
are considered rare. Even devastating side
efects such as death or serious disability
can be defended on the basis of the belief
that vaccination as a medical practice does
more good than harm for the majority of
the population.
At the top you have bureaucrats and the
medical profession via oicial bodies
saying vaccines are safe and well researched
even when they're not. he case of the
MeNZB™ vaccine which is being used in
a mass vaccination campaign even though
it couldn't even gain full registration is a
perfect illustration of this.
he opinion that vaccines are safe and
efective cascades down the ranks to the
people performing vaccination. Most
doctors and nurses do not question the
safety or efectiveness of vaccines, having
been trained to believe that vaccination
is an important public health tool.
Moreover, information supplied to health
professionals on an ongoing basis by the
MoH is biased in favour of vaccination.
It oten omits, downplays or attempts to
discredit data that shows that vaccines are
associated with long term adverse efects.
hose health professionals who have seen
110
the damaging efects of vaccinations on
the health of their patients or who have
read the medical literature on vaccines
know they would be going out on a very
shaky limb if they were to break ranks
and go public about their concerns. he
general public are oten not cognisant
of the enormous pressures on doctors
to conform. It takes quite a remarkably
honest and brave person to speak out
from within the medical profession
about the dangers of vaccines. Campbell
Murdoch, a Professor of General Practice
at Otago Medical School wrote in a 1995
article in "New Zealand Family Physician"
(22:4, p136),
"It is a brave or foolish medical person
who dares to question the wisdom of this
wonderful scientiic advance, for to do so
is to challenge one of the sacred cows of
modern medicine....espoused uncritically
by the medical profession."
here are doctors we know of who
won't let their own children get this
vaccine. However, rather than sharing
their concerns with the general public
they prefer to remain relatively quiet,
expressing their reservations privately.
Considering the threat to their careers
that would result from their speaking
out, this is understandable, but given how
many children are being damaged by the
vaccine in the name of their profession,
it is ultimately reprehensible. However, it
is not as reprehensible as the numerous
doctors and nurses who are quietly
ignoring and even actively suppressing
the evidence of side-efects, such is their
attachment to an ideology.
I'll give you just a couple of examples we
have heard about. Two young, pre-school
children, brother and sister, living in
Manukau, were given their irst two doses
of MeNZB™ vaccine. Ater the second
dose both exhibited behavioural changes
that included becoming very insecure,
constantly grizzly, and in the boy’s case,
becoming very aggressive which was
completely out of character. his went
on for many weeks and has been highly
distressing for the family.
he boy vomited on and of for a couple
of weeks, and lost his appetite completely
for the irst week. Some of these events
happened ater their irst shots, but most of
the adverse events were worse the second
time around. Both children developed a
bizarre rash that covered much of their
torsos. he rash was lat and red, and not
itchy.
Both children also developed sleeping vaccination.) Luckily, the girl seems to the population carry a strain or strains of
problems, waking up many times during have come right. However, the mother is meningococcal bacteria in their tonsillar
the night, and having nightmares. now very doubtful about getting the third tissue, harmlessly. his indicates that the
According to their mother, both had been dose for either of her children. pathogens aren't so much the problem as
very good sleepers before their MeNZB™ the possible inability of the host's immune-
shots. Other side-efects have been reported to us system to keep them under control. he
as well – including vomiting, diarrhoea, strength of the immune system rests
In the little girl’s case, in on many factors, such as diet, intake of
the second week ater her vitamin C, etc. Prolonged stress can burn
second dose, she started “Why has all the emphasis been on the up vitamin C reserves, as can having to
waking up at 10pm deal with toxins.
and was not able to fall vaccine instead of the well documented
asleep again. At around factors associated with increased risk here can be little doubt that the pain of
2 to 3am she oten would the injection of the vaccine, along with the
start back-arching and
for children developing meningococcal stress produced by the various toxins in
emitting a high pitched disease – such as passive smoking, low the vaccine, such as aluminium (a known
wailing scream, which levels of vitamin C, iron deiciency, use of neurotoxin), will deplete the reserves of
was so loud it brought vitamins and minerals in some children,
the neighbours over. anti-pyretics, and poor diet? leading to weakening of immunity. In
his went on for about some cases, this weakening of immunity
4 weeks or more. he may lead to the development of serious
mother, Rachel M.
“Why has all the emphasis been on the illness.
reported that she went to vaccine instead of the well documented
two diferent doctors, an factors associated with increased risk Personally I hate to think what long term
emergency doctor and side-efects await many of the children
eventually her own GP. for children developing meningococcal afected by this vaccine. Will a higher rate
disease – such as passive smoking, low of insulin dependent diabetes, autism,
"I told them what had learning disorders or asthma, occur
gone on, and at neither
levels of vitamin C, iron deiciency, use of because of this massive campaign?
time did they mention anti-pyretics, and poor diet? Cui Bono?”
that it could be a vaccine It is very possible, considering that all these
reaction." problems are associated with vaccines in
peer-reviewed medical literature.
She reported that one
of the doctors said on being told of the and indurations (swelling of the injection But inasmuch as the NZ health authorities
screaming and back arching, "Maybe it's site). hese are very common reactions, are probably never going to do proper
tummy cramps." and acknowledged by the MoH, though long-term follow up studies we'll be lucky
dismissed as of no real consequence. In if there will ever be any oicial recognition
hey didn't even bother to investigate. In addition, we have heard of a number of of such long term side-efects. As it is, the
fact the doctors ended up telling her that toddlers who have been unable to walk MoH can't even acknowledge medium-
both children's problems were probably for two to three days ater their shots, and term adverse events such as I have just
due to a recurrence of ear infections, some who also developed bizarre rashes related.
perhaps in combination with “teething”. covering much of their bodies. Bedwetting
Her GP gave her antibiotics for the ear and asthma are also being reported. Institutional Mechanisms of
infection.
here have been reports of a Denial
Rachel is too scared to ask her doctor number of deaths associated
to report the reactions to the Centre for with the vaccine. I have "he expenditure of large his form of
Adverse Reactions Monitoring, and was endeavoured to follow up amounts of money in institutional denial
unaware that she could do it herself. on them, requesting that areas that have a direct is not surprising. To
my contact details be passed bearing on people's lives are admit the truth of
he little girl's strange screaming and back along the bereaved parents; determined oten by political potential and real
arching are classic signs of encephalitis – however, to date I have not considerations rather than serious side-efects
severe inlammation of the central nervous heard from them. I spoke documented health status or would probably lead
system – which can sometimes lead to to one woman who said the needs of the population". to a public outcry, and
brain damage with permanent efects such she'd recently attended great loss of face for
as epilepsy, autistic spectrum disorders, the funeral of a toddler – Professor Frank Oberklaid both the Ministry of
personality changes, learning diiculties who had apparently been of the Royal Children's Health and the medical
etc. his should have been investigated healthy prior to receiving Hospital in Melbourne profession. Contracts
thoroughly, and almost certainly would the vaccine. Two days ater have been signed,
have been, if instead of having been the MeNZB™ shot, the child money has changed
vaccine related, it was associated with was dead. he oicial cause of death was hands, and individual and institutional
an illness like meningococcal disease or “pneumonia”. reputations are at stake, including that of
measles. (Encephalitis is well known in the Clark government. Regardless of the
the literature as a potential outcome of Most people don’t realise that up to 45% of facts, they are not going to willingly back
down.

111
Ironically, as Ron Law points out,
if this vaccine campaign had been
launched one year earlier, the MoH
doubtless would be crowing how this
year’s low case-load was the result of it.
The Real Aim of this
Campaign
So why is it that this massive campaign
got under way here when mortality
and morbidity from meningococcal B
disease can't even break into the top
ten preventable causes index for either
deaths or hospitalisations? Why has a
problematic vaccine been foisted on us
with no expense spared, rather than ixing
more serious health problems such as
diet-related birth defects or leukaemia?
Perhaps it is because the giant
pharmaceutical companies which
manufacture vaccines care far more about
their proits than they do about vaccine
side-efects. And those 100’s of millions of
dollars of proits they make from vaccines
helps give them a lot of leverage over
health policies of governments. As the
saying goes, "Money Talks".
It is diicult for the general public
to understand the interface between
government departments and these
wealthy private transnationals. he
bureaucrats, a lot of the top medical
professionals and corporate people oten
move in the same social circles, and many
doctors are in the employ of Big Pharma.
Conlicts of interest are seldom disclosed.
For example, the Immunisation Advisory
Centre (IMAC), based in Auckland
Medical School is vociferously pro-
vaccine, and employs several doctors and
nurses as full-time and part-time staf.
heir director, Dr. Nikki Turner, is oten
consulted by the media for her opinion.
She is oten on the TV news, warning
about the childhood illnesses, and tries to
allay any doubts about vaccines.
Nearly everyone assumes that IMAC is
part of the Ministry of Health. Turner will
sometimes point out that IMAC is actually
part of Auckland University, and nothing
to do with the government. Turner makes
much of the fact that IMAC draws upon
“academic” research when she speaks at
public meetings.
What she neglects to mention, however,
is that IMAC is indirectly funded by the
vaccine manufacturers. he Immunisation
Advisory Centre is part of the Goodfellow
Unit in the Auckland Medical School,
which gets substantial grants from quite
a few of the big vaccine manufacturing
corporations.
here are many good people involved in
allopathic medicine and many of them
do not inancially beneit from vaccines
in any major way. Institutions are not
monolithic forces. Some of the best
people I have met have been doctors. he
trouble is they aren't the ones in power
and they're outnumbered, even if they're
aware of the vaccine controversy, which
they usually are not.
It is not as though the rest of society as a
whole can claim moral superiority. Many
of us are morally grey in various areas of
our lives. How many of us, for instance,
think about the political ramiications of
shopping, how sweatshop labour was used
to make that trendy sports jacket that sells
for such a low price? As Albert Einstein
once said, "he world is a dangerous place,
not so much because of evil people and
what they do, but because of good people
looking on, and doing nothing."
Regarding vaccination, we only have to
look at the USA to know what the future
could hold for New Zealand. To date,
the MoH and commercial interests have
been largely successful in manufacturing
public consent for increasing numbers
of unnecessary vaccines by using tools
such as coercive publicity campaigns and
fraudulent statistics. However, I have
“So why is it that this massive campaign got under way
here when mortality and morbidity from meningococcal B
disease can't even break into the top ten preventable causes
index for either deaths or hospitalisations?”
little doubt they would like to introduce
mandatory vaccination here.
Mandatory vaccination means that
unless a child is fully vaccinated they
can't attend a state-funded school. You
could say it is compulsory vaccination
by proxy. In America doctors and nurses
grill patients and their families who come
into hospitals for whatever reason, about
the vaccination status of children, and it
is common for social workers to coerce
parents who haven't got their children “up
to date” with shots.
Many parents have had their children
112
removed from their care, and have
been accused of neglect for this reason.
Parents have also been taken to court. For
example a recent Washington Post article
(30 Oct. 2004) outlined how 41 parents in
Washington DC were recently ordered to
face a judge under the 1990 Compulsory
School Attendance Act because their
children weren't fully vaccinated. his Act
gives a judge the power to ine a parent up to
$100 or imprison them for 5 days for each
ofence. Only 34 parents fronted. Arrest
warrants were sent out for the others. It
would appear that mandatory vaccination
has created the legal framework for these
kinds of deplorable bullying tactics that
ride roughshod over the right to refuse
medical drugs for healthy children.
What paved the way for such a law change?
Some would say it was apathy, and too
much respect for “authority”.
In fact, there is reason to believe
that preparations are being made for
mandatory vaccination to become the
law in New Zealand. he irst step was
the Health (Immunisation) Regulations
of 1995 which require every child to
have an "Immunisation Certiicate", and
require all kindergartens and schools to
maintain an "Immunisation Register".
his law allows for serious invasion of
privacy, prodding and probing by health
and education professionals as regards
vaccination status of children. Hence, the
principle of the right to refuse a medical
treatment, the right to liberty of thought,
and the freedom to choose medical
therapies other than allopathy without
harassment or guilt are being eroded.
Many people in New Zealand reject the
idea that a centralised bureaucracy has
a “need to know” the personal medical
records of every citizen. herefore we
advocate that all parents refuse to sign the
consent forms no matter if they are letting
their children be vaccinated or not.
Having everyone under 20 vaccinated
within a short time frame is an excellent
way to kick-start the computerisation
of the National Immunisation Register.
hose children whose parents refused
consent will be more eiciently marked the Norwegian meningococcal B vaccine
out, because as these children grow up and a meningococcal C vaccine, and
each time they use a health service their having a paltry follow-up of (“up to”) only
vaccination records will come up on the 7 days, likewise shows the lack of regard
computer screen when their medical for public health.
records are accessed.
he hypocrisy of bankrolling scare-
he computer register allows for many
mongering propaganda about an infection
more opportunities to harass "neglectful"
that during 2004 only caused 2 deaths in
parents, to co-ordinate future vaccine
under 20 year olds, while failing to properly
strategies and campaigns etc. It would
tackle immensely more substantive, but
allow school authorities to co-ordinate
less proitable, causes of death and sickness
more fully with the family courts, social
(including of meningitis), such as low
services, and health system if and when
breastfeeding rates, poor diets, chemical
legal pressure is brought to bear on
and electromagnetic pollution, iatrogenic
illnesses and
deaths (including
“We have a health bureaucracy that is far vaccination itself) is
more heedful of the demands of commerce quite breathtaking.
than the needs of the population it purports
hat our population
to serve. Working for the beneit of the has not reacted
with anger to the
pharmaceutical giants, it has sought to present charade,
ignore, discredit, and even harass those and is not calling
who argue that the MeNZB™ vaccine is still for a major enquiry
is a sad testament
experimental, may not prevent meningococal to widespread
disease caused by the target strain, and may apathy, scientiic
ignorance, and
be seriously damaging some children and fear of rocking the
babies.” boat.
Editor's note:
families who choose to “opt out”. In efect, Readers who are interested in reading
freedom to choose would become severely further about this issue may like to go to the
compromised with so many penalties Vaccination Alternatives Society web site:
and coercive practices available to http://beyondvaccines.vibrantplanet.com
authorities to discourage non-compliance
that it would be almost as draconian as Parents (and grandparents) may ind the
compulsory vaccination. Many American case of Baby P, who was a participant in
parents can vouch for that. one of the clinical trials of the MeNZB™
vaccine particularly interesting reading.
In summary, I see the MeNZB™ campaign, Another site, that of the Immunisation
with its use of pseudo-science, slick Awareness Society also has useful
sloganeering, and emotive advertising as information on the MeNZB™ vaccine
a taste of what the future holds for New – as well as other vaccines: its address is:
Zealand. We have a health bureaucracy http://www.ias.org.nz
that is far more heedful of the demands
of commerce than the needs of the he Ministry of Health/corporate line
population it purports to serve. Working can be found on the following web site:
for the beneit of the pharmaceutical http://www.immunise.moh.govt.nz/
giants, it has sought to ignore, discredit,
and even harass those who argue that the Jason Sanders is the Spokesperson for
MeNZB™ vaccine is still experimental, may
not prevent meningococal disease caused SOME USEFUL WEB SITES
by the target strain, and may be seriously
damaging some children and babies. http://www.vaccinationnews.com
http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html
he refusal to properly investigate the http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/
many allegations of serious side-efects vaccine.htm
and even of deaths, speaks volumes. http://www.909shot.com
he dishonest science of having no true http://www.thinktwice.com
placebos in the pre-licensing safety trials, http://www.redlagsweekly.com
instead using other similar vaccines like
113
Vaccination alternatives Society nZ.
MORE QUESTIONS
ABOUT THE
ANTIBODY THEORY
"he fallacy of this (antibody theory)
was exposed nearly 50 years ago, which
is hardly recent. A report published by
the Medical Research Council entitled
‘A study of diphtheria in two areas of
Gt. Britain, Special report series 272,
HMSO’, 1950, demonstrated that
many of the diphtheria patients had
high levels of circulating antibodies,
whereas many of the contacts who
remained perfectly well had low
antibody."--Magda Taylor, Informed
Parent
"Just because you give somebody a
vaccine, and perhaps get an antibody
reaction, doesn’t mean a thing. he
only true antibodies, of course, are
those you get naturally. What we’re
doing [when we inject vaccines]
is interfering with a very delicate
mechanism that does its own thing.
If nutrition is correct, it does it in
the right way. Now if you insult a
person in this way and try to trigger
of something that nature looks ater,
you’re asking for all sorts of trouble,
and we don’t believe it works."—Glen
Dettman Ph.D, interviewed by Jay
Patrick, and quoted in "he Great
American Deception," Let’s Live,
December 1976, p. 57.
"Many measles vaccine eicacy studies
relate to their ability to stimulate an
antibody response, (sero-conversion
or sero-response). An antibody
response does not necessarily equate
to immunity... the level of antibody
needed for efective immunity
is diferent in each individual...
immunity can be demonstrated in
individuals with a low or no detectable
levels of antibody. Similarly in other
individuals with higher levels of
antibody there may be no immunity.
“We therefore need to stay clear on
the issue: How do we know if the
vaccine is efective for a particular
individual when we do not know what
level of antibody production equals
immunity?"– Trevor Gunn BSc
The Whole (Rotten) Tooth
about Fluoride
Or – How the authorities came to be able to put a toxic industrial waste
into your water supply while making you think it’s good for your teeth
Would you intentionally ingest a
material that is used as a pesticide
and is a probable carcinogen (causes
cancer), causes hip fractures, intellectual
impairment, fertility problems, deformed
ish and dental and skeletal deformities?
Listed as one of the top 25 censored
stories of 1998, the use of luoride in
our drinking water may have originated
over 50 years ago as a way to cover-up
the dangers of luoride irst discovered
during the project to create the irst
atomic bomb.
While going over hundreds of
declassiied documents about the U.S.
atomic bomb development program,
the Manhattan Project, reporters Joel
Griiths and Chris Bryson found that
luoride was the key chemical in atomic
bomb production. Millions of tons were
subsequently used during the Cold War
period to manufacture the high-grade
uranium and plutonium for nuclear
weapons.
Fluoride was the top chemical hazard of
the U.S. nuclear weapons programme,
By Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D.
not only for workers, but for those living
in nearby communities as well.
he documents show that the irst
U.S. lawsuits levied against the atomic
weapons program were over luoride
poisoning, not radiation damage.
he documents reveal that the U.S.
government secretly ordered atomic
bomb scientists to create "evidence useful
in litigation" against defence contractors
who were being accused of injuring
citizens with luoride.
In order to gather information, the
government experimented with the
residents of Newburgh, New York
between 1945 and 1955. In a highly
classiied operation, the government
secretly gathered blood and tissue
samples from people of that town with
the help of the New York Department
of Health. Some of the results were
published, but the U.S. Atomic Energy
Commission (now the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission) censored the
report for reasons of "national security"
by removing the evidence of the adverse
health efects from luoride.
114
he evidence is compelling that the
entire U.S. – and now international
– programme of water luoridation
began as a massive efort to coverup one
of the most toxic materials to come out
of the nuclear weapons programme. If
luoride was presented to the country
as beneicial, then no one could sue the
government for being harmed by it.
Have you seen children and young adults
among your family and friends with
those whitish spots or lecks on their
teeth or, in more extreme cases, dark
streaks that look like decay? his is the
efect of dental luorosis, the irst visible
sign of overexposure to luoride. In some
communities, the incidence of dental
luorosis is 30 to 60 percent or more.
In the last 50 years, luoride has shown
up in toothpastes, in byproducts from the
chemical industry and even in tablets for
children, increasing our exposure to the
chemical greatly. Unprecedented levels of
luoride are accumulating in our bodies,
particularly the bodies of children.
Fluoride accumulates in the bones
and has been linked to an increase in
Would you
intentionally
ingest a material
that is used as a pesticide
and is a probable carcingoen
(causes cancer), causes
hip fractures, intellectual
impairment,fertility
problems, deformed ish
and dental and skeletal
deformities?
osteosarcoma (bone cancer) in the
occurrence of stress fractures in young
people in the United States.
Fluoride, simply put, poisons the body.
It does not strengthen the teeth. In fact,
there is no known use for luoride in the
body. It is not a nutrient. It is a poison.
he U.S. government's eforts to keep
luoride toxicity secret has had efects
to this day. Very few studies have been
done investigating the harmful efects
of luoride. Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, former
head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental
Center in Boston and now a critic of
luoridation, conducted animal studies in
the early 1990s. She found that luoride
is a powerful central nervous system
toxin and that the human brain could be
adversely afected even at low doses.
In fact today, research from China has
shown a correlation between exposure
to low doses of luoride and diminished
IQ in children. But when Dr. Mullenix
applied for a grant from the U.S. National
Institutes of Health (NIH) to continue
her central nervous system research, she
was turned town. An NIH panel latly
told her that "luoride does not have
central nervous system efects."
Yet a declassiied atomic bomb program
memo dated April 29, 1944 states,
clearly that "clinical evidence suggests
that uranium hexaluoride may have a
rather marked central nervous system
efect..." he memo goes on to ask for
a series of animal tests to be done on
central nervous system efects and says,
"this is important not only to protect a
given individual, but also to prevent a
confused workman from injuring others
by improperly performing his duties."
he irst air pollution disaster in the
United States involved luoride. You
won't ind it in most history books.
On October 31, 1948, an inversion
layer caused the fumes from the U.S.
"In point of fact, luorine causes more human
cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other
chemical."
– Dean Burk, chief chemist emeritus at the U.S. National Cancer Institute.
Steel plant in Donora, Pennsylvania to
sink to the ground, killing 20 people
and sickening 2/3 of the town's 14,000
inhabitants. If the weather pattern had
lasted another day, thousands would have
been killed.
An oicial report at the time of the
disaster said that no single chemical was
the cause, but Philip Stadtler, the nation's
leading luoride expert at the time, said
the luoride levels in the blood of dead
and dying people that night were 12
to 25 times above normal. he oicial
report not only helped U.S. Steel avoid
compensating the people, but it saved
other luoride-producing industries
from worry. Today, steel and aluminum
manufactures release huge amounts of
luoride into the atmosphere.
So, is our nation's water luoridation
programme the product of an efort to
keep secret the toxic efects of luoride?
Unbelievably, this seems to be the case.
Many studies also show that the
incidence of cavities in children in
luoridated communities is virtually the
same as non-luoridated communities,
yet the mythology of luoride continues.
he Resources section below will help
you choose what you can do. But once
again, the larger issue is about the
assumptions we make in our society
and where we have been taught to place
our trust. Evidence is mounting that all
assumptions must be challenged. We
must ask "why" every step of the way and
then ind ways to say "no!"
he NZ Fluoride
Action Network:
www.luoridealert.org
115
neurotoxicity
of luoride in
drinking water:
Sodium Fluoride is currently added to
the majority of municipal water systems
in the U.S. to prevent cavities in children.
Its use has risen rapidly since the 1950’s.
Sodium Fluoride is also registered with the
EPA as a rat poison, although advocates
say its use in low levels in water poses no
adverse health concerns. here has been
considerable research done on luoride
regarding cancer, birth defects, and risks
to the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and
urinary systems, however, very little has
been done on its neurological efects.
SOURCE:
Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 17(2), 1995
http://www.chem-tox.com/pregnancy/luoride.htm
First Study to Find Neurological Deicits
Ater Fluoride Exposure
Chinese investigations have shown levels
of luoride in drinking water at levels of 3-
11 ppm afect the nervous system without
irst causing physical malformations.
Another Chinese study found Attention
Deicit Disorders in adult humans if
sublingual drops containing 100 ppm
of sodium luoride were administered.
Sources of luoride exposure include
processed beverages, toothpastes, mouth
rinses, dietary supplements and food. his
is an exposure level potentially relevant to
humans because toothpastes contain 1000
to 1500 ppm luoride and mouth rinses
contain 230-900 ppm luoride.
In the 1995 article appearing in the journal
Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Dr.
Phyllis J Mullenix states, "Still unexplored,
however, is the possibility that luoride
exposure is linked with subtle brain
dysfunction. his is the irst study to
demonstrate that central nervous system
output is vulnerable to luoride, that the
efects on behaviour depend on the age at
exposure and that luoride accumulates
in brain tissues. Of course behaviours
per se do not extrapolate, but a generic
behavioural pattern disruption as found in
this rat study can be indicative of potential
for motor dysfunction, IQ deicits and/or
learning disabilities in humans. Substances
that accumulate in brain tissue potentiate
concerns about neurotoxic risk."
– Dr. Phyllis J. Mullenix
Toxicology Department, Forsyth Research
Institute, Boston, MA.
ARTICLE TITLE: Neurotoxicity of
Sodium Fluoride in Rats.
 Can your toothpaste cause alzheimer's?
Letter to: Jeff Rense (rense.com)
From: Paul Kuhlman
...If you can
remember how.
I am a truck driver, and have hauled
just about everything over the past 13
years.
I read your site's article postulating
that naturally occurring aluminium
found in water might be the key to
Alzheimer's disease.
I'll go one better than that.
I once picked up a 44,000 pound
load of aluminium dioxide powder
in the aptly-named town of Bauxite,
Arkansas. Noting that the destination
for the load was not a processing
plant or a mill I enquired as to
why this load was destined for the
Colgate-Palmolive Company. he
shipping agent said that the quality of
bauxite (Aluminium dioxide) found
in Arkansas was too low grade for
manufacturing purposes, but was ine
for toothpaste.
"Toothpaste?" I enquired. He then
went on to explain that common
white toothpaste is made largely from
Aluminium Dioxide, which is a mildly
abrasive, brilliantly white powder.
hey'll simply add a sudsing agent to
make the bubbles, a lavouring agent
to make it palatable, perhaps a food
colouring agent, some water, and
presto – toothpaste!
Go read the ingredients on your
tube of toothpaste. It'll list one or
two “active ingredients” ...notice the
combined total amounts of 'active
ingredients' is usually less than 1%.
What about the other 99%?
• Were you aware that every day of
your life, you are illing your mouth
with a gob of nearly pure aluminium
dioxide?
• Can you imagine the possible health
efects?
• Do you see how this is the number
one entry point for aluminium to
enter the body?
• Can you guess why the inactive
ingredients aren't listed?
• Imagine the outcry from all
the millions of health conscious
Americans who suddenly discovered
that they are being poisoned!
Yes, that's why they aren't listed.
116
CONFIRMATION :
– From How Products Are Made
Byproducts/Waste
“Alumina, the intermediate
substance that is produced
by the Bayer process and that
constitutes the raw material
for the Hall-Heroult process,
is also a useful inal product. It
is a white, powdery substance
with a consistency that ranges
from that of talcum powder
to that of granulated sugar. It
can be used in a wide range
of products such as laundry
detergents, toothpaste, and
luorescent light bulbs. It
is an important ingredient
in ceramic materials; for
example, it is used to make
false teeth, spark plugs, and
clear ceramic windshields
for military airplanes. An
efective polishing compound,
it is used to inish computer
hard drives, among other
products. Its chemical
properties make it efective
in many other applications,
including catalytic converters
and explosives. It is even used
in rocket fuel; 400,000 lb
(180,000 kg) is consumed in
every space shuttle launch.
Approximately 10% of the
alumina produced each year
is used for applications other
than making aluminium...”
 The Great mammography Hoax
By Barry Lynes
he great deceit began in the early 1970s. It
was concocted by insiders at the American
Cancer Society (ACS) and their “friends”
at the National Cancer Institute.
he number of women who were put
“at risk” or who died as a result of this
nefarious scheme is not known but
estimated to be huge.
he Director of the NCI at the time of
this massive abuse of the public trust later
let government service and took a high
paying position at ACS (sort of a payof).
he American Cancer Society’s self serving
programme (inancial scheme) continues
to the present day (1999) and probably
into the 21st century until enough women
realise the stakes and force an end to the
lie and the terrible dangers.
he American Cancer Society (ACS)
particularly wanted to push mammography
because it could be tied in with the
Society’s own inancial objectives (keep in
mind the ACS slogan “a check [cheque]
and a checkup”). And the radiologists, of
course, loved the ACS programme. here
were few, if any, powerful voices, either,
individual or institutional which cried
out, “No!” or “God No! Don’t do this. NO.
NO. NO.”
he collusive attack on healthy American
women happened because “the ix was
in.”
Powerful politicians and the media were
silent.
Silent as sleeping sentinels while a
determined, aggressive, self serving
gang of sophisticated mammography
operatives manipulated the nation’s entire
cancer programme to suit its own interests.
And to hell with the millions of American
women who would pay the price for the
next thirty years or more, well into the
21st century.
In 1978, Irwin J. D. Bross., Director of
Biostatistics at Roswell Park Memorial
Institute for Cancer Research commented
about the cancer screening programme:
“he women should have been given the
information about the hazards of radiation
at the same time they were given the sales
talk for mammography...Doctors were
gung ho to use it on a large scale. hey
went right ahead and X-rayed not just
a few women but a quarter of a million
women...A jump to the exposure of a
quarter of a million persons to something
which could do more harm than good was
criminal and it was supported by money
from the federal government and the
American Cancer Society.”
he National Cancer Institute (NCI) was
warned in 1974 by Professor Malcolm
C. Pike at the University of Southern
California School of Medicine that a
number of specialists had concluded
117
that “giving a women under age 50 a
mammogram on a routine basis is close to
unethical.”
Repeat... he experts in the government
were told not to do this to healthy women in
the YEAR 1974! he warning was ignored
because Mary Lasker (whose husband was
the dark advertising devil behind the Lucky
Strike cigarette advertising campaigns) and
her advertising / promotional / corporate
power types at the American Cancer
Society (ACS) wanted mammography.
Everyone else could go to hell. What Mary
and her powerful political allies wanted in
the cancer world, they got. Everyone else,
including the public, was ignored.
By the early 1980s, NCI and ACS were
at it again. hey jointly put forth new
guidelines promoting (again!)... annual
breast X-Rays for women under age 50.
hey just simply refused to give up their
lucrative racket. (One oicial candidly
admitted the publicity brought in more
research money for both institutions.)
hey refused to do what was not in their
personal, empire building interest no
matter the cost in human lives.
“...doctors and their patients assumed that
there was good evidence supporting those
recommendations. But at the time, only
one study showed positive beneit and the
results were not signiicant.”
In 1985, the respected British medical
journal he Lancet, one of the ive leading
medical journals in the world, published
an article which ripped the NCI-ACS
propaganda to shreds. It not only (again!)
exposed the original onslaught by the high
level ACS and NCI conspirators in the
early middle 1970s against a quarter of a
million unsuspecting American women,
but reviled the continuing 1980s ACS NCI
propaganda.
“Over 280,000 women were recruited
without being told that no beneit of
mammography had been shown in a
controlled trial for women below 50, and
without being warned about the potential
risk of induction of breast cancer by the
test which was supposed to detect it ...
...in women below 50... mammography
gives no beneit...”
But nothing happened. Mammography
was known to cause cancer but the media
and the “health oicials” in the government
stayed silent! he mammography policy
pushed by the American Cancer Society
to ill its bank account, remained the U.S.
government policy for ten more years
until a massive Canadian study showed
conclusively what was known 20 YEARS
before but what was not in the interests
of ACS and NCI to admit: X-raying
the breasts of women younger than age
50 provided no beneit and probably
endangered their lives.
In February 1992 Dr Samuel Epstein,
professor at the University of Illinois
Medical Center in Chicago, a tireless
opponent of the “cancer establishment,”
along with 64 other distinguished cancer
authorities opposing the status quo
thinking, warned the public about the
ACS and NCI shenanigans. he ACS and
NCI (like long married felons caught in a
crime together) were outraged, terming
Dr. Epstein’s reference to the breast studies
as “unethical and invalid.”
he next month, the Washington Post
broke the story into the mainstream media
(inally!). It published an article by Dr.
Epstein which exposed what the ACS and
their insider “friends” at NCI had done to
countless women twenty years earlier and
continued for twenty years until 1992. Dr.
Epstein wrote:
“...he high sensitivity of the breast,
especially in young women, to radiation
induced cancer was known by 1970.
Nevertheless, the establishment then
screened some 300,000 women with X-
ray dosages so high as to increase breast
cancer risk by up to 20 percent in women
aged 40 to 50 who were mammogrammed
annually.
Women were given no warning whatever;
how many subsequently developed breast
cancer remains uninvestigated.
“...Additionally, the establishment
ignores safe and efective alternatives
to mammography, particularly trans-
illumination with infrared scanning.
“... For most cancers, survival has not
changed for decades. Contrary claims are
based on rubber numbers.”
he crimes described were crimes. hey
were not errors of judgment. hey were not
diferences of scientiic opinion. hey were
conscious, chosen, politically expedient
acts by a small group of people for the sake
of their own power, prestige and inancial
gain, resulting in sufering and death for
many women. hey it the classiication of
“crimes against humanity.”
In December of 1992, the New York Times
published facts about the Mammography
scam. he story included the following:
“Dr. I. Craig Henderson, director of the
clinical cancer center at the University of
California in San Francisco, said, ‘We have
to tell women the truth’ ...
“Dr. Robert McLelland, a radiologist at
the University of North Carolina School
of Medicine, said... ‘In our zeal to promote
mammography, we as radiologists and I’m
one of them, haven’t looked at the
evidence.’
In July 1995, he Lancet blasted (again)
the whole ACS and NCI mammography
scam into global awareness:
“he beneit is marginal, the harm caused
is substantial, and the costs incurred are
enormous...”
But the spreading knowledge of what
was going on made no diference to the
bureaucrats “protecting the public” at the
NCI and the FDA who had their empires
to protect. And of course the American
Cancer Society (ACS) furiously fought
every attempt by those with any honour
in the federal agencies who sought to
restrict the number of mammography
examinations for individual women or
to extend the age at which a woman had
her irst one. Mammography was the
American Cancer Society’s “sacred (cash)
cow” and they wanted legions of women
to begin having annual exams as early as
the ACS could brainwash them into doing
(“a check and a checkup”).
By 1999, even celebrity poet Maya Angelou
was shamefully and ignorantly promoting
mammography in public service ads on
television, parroting the American Cancer
Society’s propaganda spiel. Nothing had
118
changed. hose “protecting the public”
at NCI and FDA were doing the exact
opposite. hey were hiding, protecting
their little empires, while American
women were being needlessly exposed to
dangerous, cancer causing X-rays.
In September 1999, the full depth of
the decades long deceit was explicitly
described in an article in the journal
Alternative Medicine. It would reach
relatively few mainstream American
women, who were still being brainwashed
by the “interests” through the mainstream
media and pliable state and federal
legislators representatives of the people”
but it did provide a torch glow in a dark
night.
Here’s the awful truth it stated baldly
like a screaming American eagle to any
American woman fortunate enough to
read the hard facts:
“...Mammograms increase the risk for
developing breast cancer and raise the risk
of spreading or metastasising an existing
growth,’ says Dr. Charles B. Simone, a
former clinical associate in immunology
and pharmacology at the National Cancer
Institute...
“...the annual mammographic screening
of 10,000 women aged 50-70 will extend
the lives of, at best, 26 of them; and annual
screening of 10,000 women in their 40s
will extend the lives of only 12 women per
year.”
So there’s the lie and the depth of the
Mammography Deceit spelled out:
mammography will extend at best 26
women’s lives for 10,000 women put
at risk in order to beneit radiologists,
the American Cancer Society, assorted
bureaucrats, and other “interested”
parties who proit of the vast, well
organised mammography deceit when
safe alternatives (such as thermography)
exist but are ignored.
References available from the author. his article is
excerpted from the book:
Cancer Solutions: Rife, Energy Medicine, and
Medical Politics by Barry Lynes.
To purchase the book from the author the price is
$US26 including Air Mail postage to New Zealand,
Australia or Asia. Make cheques or money orders to
Barry Lynes. Sorry, no credit cards. Please send all
funds payable in US dollars to:
Barry Lynes
P.O. Box 12183
Palm Desert,
CA 92255 USA
he State of Mammography
in New Zealand
Katherine Smith
he Ministry of Health currently funds
a free (to the patient) mammography
service in which women aged 45 to 69
are ofered a mammogram every two
years. his service, called "BreastScreen
Aotearoa" is publicised by television
advertisements featuring smiling women
of several diferent ethnicities.
he service has a website http://www.
healthywomen.org.nz/BSA/DEFAULT.
aspx where mammography is promoted
as a technique that will "not harm
the breast" but can help to save lives
by preventing women from dying
from breast cancer. According to the
BreastScreen Aotearoa website:
"Screening does not afect the chance of
developing breast cancer, but reduces
the chance of dying from breast cancer.
Women who have regular mammograms
reduce their chance of dying from breast
cancer. For women under 50, their
chance of dying from breast cancer is
reduced by about 20% and for women
over 50 it is reduced by about 30%."
Mammograms are also promoted in New
Zealand as being "safe", to quote from the
BreastScreen Aotearoa website, "because
only very small amounts of radiation are
used."
It is instructive to compare BreastScreen
Aotearoa's simplistic assurances with
statements made by Dr Samuel Epstein
Professor Emeritus Environmental and
Occupational Medicine, and Chairman,
Cancer Prevention Coalition, University
of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public
Health.
"he routine practice [in the USA] of
taking four ilms of each breast annually
results in approximately 1 rad (radiation
absorbed dose) exposure.
"his is about 1,000 times greater than
exposure from a chest x-ray which is
broadly focused on the entire chest
rather than narrowly on the breast. he
premenopausal breast is highly sensitive
to radiation, each 1 rad exposure
increasing breast cancer risk by about 1
percent, with a cumulative 10 percent
increased risk for each breast over a
decade's screening.
"Radiation risks are further increased,
by some four-fold, for the 1 to 2 percent
of women who are unknowing silent
carriers of the A-T (ataxia-telangiectasia)
gene [which makes carriers more
sensitive to the cancer-causing efects
of x-rays and other ionising radiation,
– editor's note.] By some estimates, this
accounts for up to 20 percent of all breast
cancers diagnosed annually."
he policy of BreastScreen Aotearoa
which is to take two ilms of each breast
every two years, rather than the four
ilms of each breast every year typical
of medical practice in the USA means
women in the BreastScreen Aotearoa
programme have lower risk of radiation-
induced breast cancer than American
women who follow US guidelines for
mammography. However, it should
be noted that private mammography
services in New Zealand will oten give
women annual mammograms if there is
a family history of breast cancer. What's
more, these women may be encouraged
to begin annual breast screening at a
younger age than it is available through
BreastScreen Aotearoa, oten before they
have even entered menopause.
However, according to Dr Epstein it is
doubtful whether any of the increased
breast cancer risk from radiation
exposure is necessary in order to
detect breast cancer. Summarising the
conclusions of research published in
September 2000 by leading University of
Toronto epidemiologists he writes:
"Based on a unique individually
randomised control trial on breast
cancer mortality in some 40,000
women, it was concluded that monthly
Breast Self Examination following brief
training coupled with annual Clinical
Breast Exam by a trained health care
professional is a least as efective as
screening mammography in detecting
small tumors."
Epstein warns that mammography also
poses risks to women who do have
cancerous tumours in their breasts at the
time that the mammogram is performed:
119
"Since 1928, physicians have been warned
to handle 'cancerous breasts with care
for fear of accidentally disseminating
cells' and spreading the cancer.
Nevertheless, mammography entails tight
and oten painful breast compression,
particularly in premenopausal women,
which could lead to distant and lethal
spread of malignant cells by rupturing
small blood vessels in or around small
undetected breast cancers."
hermography, a radiation-free
alternative to mammography, is currently
available in a limited number of locations
in New Zealand. (An internet search
of "thermography + NZ" should turn
up locations of clinics for those who are
interested.) Infra red thermography can
detect the increased metabolic activity
of many breast tumours. In some cases
infra red thermogaphy can detect breast
tumours before they can be palpated or
visualised on a mammogram.
Unlike mammograms thermography
does not show the location within
the breast that a tumour is present
(assuming that there is one). If infra
red thermography does indicate the
presence of a tumour, further tests would
be necessary to determine the tumour's
exact location and type. If infra red
thermography does not show any breast
tissue abnormalities, a woman probably
does not have breast cancer.
However, according to a report by New
Zealand Health Technology Assessment
unit at the University of Otago, there
is not enough evidence at present to
determine whether the types of infra
red thermography devices currently in
New Zealand are a suitable replacement
for mammography as a routine breast
screening technology. his conclusion
may be in part due to the fact that only
research published in English-language
journals was reviewed by the report’s
author. Nevertheless, the fact remains
that infra red thermography does
provide a radiation-free breast screening
technology for women who want to avoid
exposing their breasts to x-rays.
Marijuana
shrinks tumors
– uS Government knew this in 1974 and
Suppressed marijuana-Tumour Research
By Raymond Cushing
raymondcushing@ireland.com
A Spanish medical team’s
study released in Madrid
in February 2000 showed
that tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC), the active chemical in
marijuana, destroys tumours
in lab rats. hese indings,
however, are not news to the
U.S. government.
A study in Virginia in 1974 yielded
similar results but was suppressed by
the DEA, and in 1983 the Reagan/Bush
administration tried to persuade U.S.
universities and researchers to destroy
all cannabis research work done between
1966 and 1976, including compendiums
in libraries.
he research was conducted by a
medical team led by Dr. Manuel
Guzman of Complutence University in
Madrid. In the study, brains of 45 lab
rats were injected with a cancer cell,
which produced tumors. On the twelth
day of the experiment, 15 of the rats
were injected with THC and 15 with
Win-55, 212-2, a synthetic compound
similar to THC. he untreated rats
died 12-18 days ater the development
of the tumors. THC treated rats lived
signiicantly longer than the control
group. Although three were unafected
by the THC, nine lived 19-35 days, while
tumors were completely eradicated in
three others. he rats treated with Win-
55,212-2 showed similar results.
In an e-mail interview for this story,
the Madrid researcher said he had
heard of the Virginia study, but had
never been able to locate literature on
it. “I am aware of the existence of that
research. In fact I have attempted many
induced leukemia in laboratory mice,
and prolonged their lives by as much as
36 percent.”
Drug Enforcement Agency oicials shut
down the Virginia study and all further
cannabis research, according to Jack
Herer, who reports on these events in
his book, he Emperor Wears No Clothes.
In 1976, President Gerald Ford put an
times to obtain the journal article on the end to all public cannabis research and
original investigation by these people, granted exclusive research rights to
but it has proven impossible,” Guzman major pharmaceutical companies. hese
said. His response wasn’t surprising, companies set out – unsuccessfully– to
considering that in 1983 the Reagan/ develop synthetic forms of THC that
Bush administration tried to persuade would deliver all the medical beneits
American universities and researchers without the “high.”
to destroy all 1966/76 cannabis research
work, including compendiums in If cannabis really does have the potential
libraries, reports Jack Herer. “We know to cure cancer in humans as well as
that large amounts of information have laboratory animals, then the body count
since disappeared,” he says. alone will make this the biggest holocaust
in recorded history. Virtually all federal
Guzman provided the title of drug policy makers of both parties since
the work – “Antineoplastic 1975 – including legislators, presidents
Activity of Cannabinoids”, and the DEA – will be complicit and
an article in a 1975 Journal of the criminally liable.
National Cancer Institute – and author
Raymond Cushing obtained a copy hat’s why they don’t want this story
at the UC Medical School Library in covered.
Davis, California,
and faxed it to
Madrid.
he 1975 article
does not mention
breast cancer
tumours, which
were featured
in the only
newspaper story
ever to appear
about the 1974
study, in the
local section of
the Washington
Post on August
18, 1974. he
headline read,
“Cancer Curb
Is Studied,” and
was followed in
part by, “he active chemical agent in
marijuana curbs the growth of three
kinds of cancer in mice and may also
suppress the immunity reaction that To learn the history of cannabis prohibition:
causes rejection of organ transplants, www.jackherer.com
***normal.org.nz
a Medical College of Virginia team
has discovered. he researchers found Project Censored - Sonoma State University, 1801
that THC slowed the growth of lung East Cotati Ave., Rohnert Park, CA 94928
(707) 664-2500 censored@sonoma.edu
cancers, breast cancers, and a virus-
120
 "Dr. Mark Randal" is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher
who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical
houses and the US government’s National Institutes of Health.
Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was “disgusted
with what he discovered about vaccines.”
As you know, since the beginning of www.nomorefakenews.
com, I have been launching an attack against non-scientiic and
dangerous assertions about the safety and eicacy of vaccines.
Mark has been one of my sources. He is a little reluctant to speak
out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current
push to make vaccines mandatory in the USA – with penalties
like quarantine lurking in the wings – he has decided to break his
silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-
time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former
work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and
its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation
of populations.

True Confessions of a
Vaccine Scientist
Interview by Jon Rappoport
www.nomorefakenews.com
Q: You were once certain that vaccines
were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few
vaccines. I won’t say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have
problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: he grounds don’t matter. hese
people have ways of causing you
problems, when you were once part of
the Club. I know one or two people who
were put under surveillance, who were
harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: he FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. he FBI used other pretexts.
And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was “part of the inner circle.” If
now I began to name names and make
speciic accusations against researchers, I
could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these eforts
at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of
modern medicine.
Vaccines are the ultimate justiication for
the overall “brilliance” of modern
medicine. Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage
Q: Do you believe that people should be systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A
allowed to choose whether they should decrease in poverty. Germs may be
get vaccines? everywhere, but when you are healthy,
A: On a political level, yes. On a you don’t contract the diseases as easily.
scientiic level, people need information,
so that they can choose well. It’s one Q: What did you feel when you
thing to say choice is good. But if the
completed your own investigation?
atmosphere is full of lies, how can you A: Despair. I realised I was working a
choose? Also, if the FDA were run by sector based on a collection of lies.
honourable people, these vaccines would
not be granted licenses. hey would be
investigated to within an inch of their Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous
than others?
lives.
A: Yes. he DPT shot, for example.
Q: here are medical he MMR. But some
historians who state “If the FDA were run by lots of a vaccine are
that the overall decline more dangerous than
honourable people, other lots of the same
of illnesses was not
due to vaccines. these vaccines would vaccine. As far as I’m
A: I know. For a not be granted licenses. concerned, all vaccines
are dangerous.
long time, I ignored hey would be
their work.
investigated to within Q: Why?
A: Several reasons.
Q: Why? an inch of their lives.”
hey involve the
A: Because I was human immune
afraid of what I system in a process that tends to
would ind out. I was in the business compromise immunity. hey can
of developing vaccines. My livelihood
actually cause the disease they are
depended on continuing that work. supposed to prevent. hey can cause
other diseases than the ones they are
Q: And then? supposed to prevent.
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which
Q: What conclusions did you come to? seem to prove that vaccines have been
A: he decline of disease is due to tremendously successful at wiping out
improved living conditions. diseases?

121
A: Why? To give the illusion that
these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine
suppresses visible symptoms of a disease
like measles, everyone assumes that
the vaccine is a success. But, under
the surface, the vaccine can harm the
immune system itself. And if it causes
other diseases – say, meningitis – that
fact is masked, because no one believes
that the vaccine can do that. he
connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine
wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the
available statistics, you get another
picture.
Q: Which is?
A: here were cities in England where
people who were not vaccinated did not
get smallpox. here were places where
people who were vaccinated experienced
smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was
already on the decline before the vaccine
was introduced.
Q: So you’re saying that we have been
treated to a false history.
A: Yes. hat’s exactly what I’m saying.
his is a history that has been cooked
up to convince people that vaccines are
invariably safe and efective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs where
purity was an issue.
A: he public believes that these labs,
these manufacturing facilities are the
cleanest places in the world. hat is not
true. Contamination occurs all the time.
You get all sorts of
debris introduced into “Remember, this
vaccines.
(vaccine) material
Q: For example, the is going into the
SV40 monkey virus bloodstream without
slips into the polio
vaccine. passing through
A: Well yes, that some of the ordinary
happened. But that’s
immune defenses.”
not what I mean. he
SV40 got into the polio
vaccine because the
vaccine was made by using monkey
kidneys. But I’m talking about something
else. he actual lab conditions. he
mistakes. he careless errors. SV40,
which was later found in cancer tumours
– that was what I would call a structural
problem. It was an accepted part of
the manufacturing process. If you use
monkey kidneys, you open the door to
germs which you don’t know are in those
kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let’s ignore that distinction
between diferent types of contaminants
for a moment. What contaminants did
you ind in your many years of work with
vaccines?
A: All right. I’ll give you some of what
I came across, and I’ll also give you what
colleagues of mine found. Here’s a partial
list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we
found various chicken viruses. In polio
vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which
is a so-called “brain-eating” amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine.
Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus
vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR
vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the
anthrax vaccine. I’ve found potentially
dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several
vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses
in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis
virus in the lu vaccine. Pestivirus in the
MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. hese are all
contaminants which don’t belong in the
vaccines.
A: hat’s right. And if you try
to calculate what damage these
contaminants can cause, well, we don’t
really know, because no testing has been
done, or very little testing. It’s a game of
roulette. You take your chances. Also,
most people don’t know that some polio
vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella
and hep A and measles vaccines have
been made with aborted human fetal
tissue. I have found what I believed
were bacterial fragments and poliovirus
in these vaccines
from time to time
– which may have
come from that fetal
tissue. When you
look for contaminants
in vaccines, you
can come up with
material that IS
puzzling. You know
it shouldn’t be there,
but you don’t know
exactly what you’ve
got. I have found what I believed was
a very small “fragment” of human hair
and also human mucus. I have found
what can only be called “foreign protein,”
which could mean almost anything. It
could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the
place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember,
122
this material is going into the blood-
stream without passing through some of
the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your indings received?
A: Basically, it was, don’t worry, this
can’t be helped. In making vaccines,
you use various animals’ tissue, and
that’s where this kind of contamination
enters in. Of course, I’m not even
mentioning the standard chemicals like
formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminium
which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: his information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I’m just mentioning some
of the biological contaminants. Who
knows how many others there are?
Others we don’t ind because we don’t
think to look for them. If tissue from,
say, a bird is used to make a vaccine,
how many possible germs can be in that
tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea
what they might be, or what efects they
could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty
premise about vaccines – that they
intricately stimulate the immune system
to create the conditions for immunity
from disease. hat is the bad premise.
It doesn’t work that way. A vaccine is
supposed to “create” antibodies which,
indirectly, ofer protection against
disease. However, the immune system
is much larger and more involved than
antibodies and their related “killer cells.”
Q: he immune system is?
A: he entire body, really. Plus the
mind. It’s all immune system, you
might say. hat is why you can have, in
the middle of an epidemic, those
individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is
important?
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely
presented?
A: here are many ways. For example,
suppose that 25 people who have
received the hepatitis B vaccine come
down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a
liver disease. But you can call liver
disease many things. You can change
the diagnosis. hen, you’ve concealed the
root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if
the doctors automatically assume
that people who get vaccines DO NOT
come down with the diseases they are
now supposed to be protected from. And
that is exactly what doctors assume.
You see, it’s circular reasoning. It’s a
closed system. It admits no fault. No
possible fault. If a person who gets a
vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or
gets some other disease, the automatic
assumption is, this had nothing to do
with the vaccine.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine
establishment, how many doctors did you
encounter who admitted that vaccines
were a problem?
A: None. here were a few who
privately questioned what they were
doing. But they would never go public,
even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died ater
a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this
baby was completely healthy before the
vaccination. here was no reason for his
death, except the vaccine. hat started my
doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe
that the baby had gotten a bad shot
from a bad lot. But as I looked into this
further, I found that was not the case in
this instance. I was being drawn into a
spiral of doubt that increased over time.
I continued to investigate. I found that,
contrary to what I thought, vaccines are
not tested in a scientiic way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies
are done on any vaccines. Long-term
follow-up is not done in any careful way.
Why? Because, again, the assumption
is made that vaccines do not cause
problems. So why should anyone check?
On top of that, a vaccine reaction is
deined so that all bad reactions are said
to occur very soon ater the shot is given.
But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn’t it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously
acts in the body for a long period of
time ater it is given. A reaction can be
gradual. Deterioration can be gradual.
Neurological problems can develop over
time. hey do in various conditions, even
according to a conventional analysis.
So why couldn’t that be the case with
vaccines? If chemical poisoning can
occur gradually, why couldn’t that be quiet. It was made clear that I should go
the case with a vaccine which contains back to work and forget my misgivings.
mercury? On a few occasions, I encountered fear.
Colleagues tried to avoid me. hey
Q: And that is what you found? felt they could be labeled with “guilt by
A: Yes. You are dealing with association.” All in all, though, I behaved
correlations, most of the time. myself. I made sure I didn’t create
Correlations are not perfect. But if you problems for myself.
get 500 parents whose children have
sufered neurological damage during a Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are
one-year period ater having a vaccine, they given?
this should be suicient to spark of an A: First of all, there is no “if.” hey
intense investigation. do harm. It becomes a more diicult
question to decide whether they do harm
Q: Has it been enough? in those people who seem to show no
harm. hen you are dealing with the
A: No. Never. his tells you something
right away. kind of research which ought to be done,
but isn’t. Researchers should be probing
to discover a kind of map, or low chart,
Q: Which is? which shows exactly what vaccines do in
A: he people doing the investigation the body from the moment they enter.
are not really interested in looking at the his research has not
facts. hey assume been done.
that the vaccines are “You see, it’s circular
safe. So, when they As to why they are
do investigate, they reasoning. It’s a closed
given, we could sit
invariably come up system. It admits no here for two days
with exonerations of fault. No possible fault. and discuss all the
the vaccines. reasons. But, at the
If a person who gets a highest levels of
hey say, “his vaccine against hepatitis the medical cartel,
vaccine is safe.” But vaccines are a top
what do they base gets hepatitis, or gets
priority because they
those judgements some other disease, the cause a weakening of
on? hey base automatic assumption is, the immune system.
them on deinitions
and ideas which this had nothing to do As you’ve said many
automatically rule out with the vaccine.” times, at diferent
a condemnation of layers of the system
the vaccine. people have their
motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the
Q: here are numerous cases where desire to win brownie points, prestige,
a vaccine campaign has failed. Where awards, promotion, misguided idealism,
people have come down with the disease unthinking habit, and so on. But, at
against which they were vaccinated. the highest levels of the medical cartel,
A: Yes, there are many such instances. vaccines are a top priority because they
And there the evidence is simply ignored. cause a weakening of the immune system.
It’s discounted. he experts say, if they
say anything at all, that this is just an I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s
isolated situation, but overall the vaccine true. he medical cartel, at the highest
has been shown to be safe. But if you level, is not out to help people, it is out
add up all the vaccine campaigns where to harm them, to weaken them. To kill
damage and disease have occurred, them. At one point in my career, I had
you realise that these are NOT isolated a long conversation with a man who
situations. occupied a high government position in
an African nation. He told me that he
was well aware of this. He told me that
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are
talking about here with colleagues, when WHO is a front for these depopulation
interests. here is an underground, shall
you were still working in the vaccine
establishment? we say, in Africa, made up of various
oicials who are earnestly trying to
A: Yes I did. change the lot of the poor. his network
of people knows what is going on.
Q: What happened? hey know that vaccines have been used,
A: Several times I was told to keep
123
and are being used, to destroy their
countries, to make them ripe for take
over by globalist powers. I have had
the opportunity to speak with several of
these people from this network.
Q: Is habo Mbeki, the president of
South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware.
Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but
he is on the way to realising the whole
truth. He already knows that HIV is a
hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs
are poisons which destroy the immune
system. He also knows that if he speaks
out, in any way, about the vaccine issue,
he will be branded a lunatic. He had
enough trouble ater his stand on the
AIDS issue.
Q: his network you speak of...
A: It has accumulated a huge amount
of information about vaccines. he
question is, how is a successful strategy
going to be mounted? For these people,
that is a diicult issue.
Q: And in the industrialised nations?
A: he medical cartel has a
stranglehold, but it is diminishing.
Mainly because people have the freedom
to question medicines. However, if the
choice issue [the right to take or reject
any medicine]does not gather steam,
these coming mandates about vaccines
against biowarfare germs are going to win
out. his is an important time.
Q: he furore over the hepatitis B
vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies
must have the vaccine – and then
in the next breath, admitting that a
person gets hep B from sexual contacts
and shared needles – is a ridiculous
juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to
cover themselves by saying that 20,000
or so children in the US get hep B every
year from “unknown causes,” and that’s
why every baby must have the vaccine.
I dispute that 20,000 igure and the so-
called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakeield, the British MD
who uncovered the link between the
MMR vaccine and autism, has just been
ired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakeield performed a great
service. His correlations between
the vaccine and autism are stunning.
Perhaps you know that Tony Blair’s wife
is involved with alternative health. here
is the possibility that their child has not
been given the MMR. Blair recently side-
stepped the question in press interviews,
and made it seem that he was simply
objecting to invasive questioning of his
“personal and family life.” In any event,
I believe his wife has been muzzled. I
think, if given the chance, she would
at least say she is sympathetic to all the
families who have come forward and
stated that their children were severely
damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get
through to her.
A: hey have been trying. But I think
she has made a deal with her husband to
keep quiet, no matter what. She could
do a great deal of good if she breaks her
promise. I have been told she is under
“he cartel operates in
every nation. It zealously
guards the sanctity of
vaccines. Questioning
these vaccines is on the
same level as a Vatican
bishop questioning the
sanctity of the sacrament
of the Eucharist in the
Catholic Church.”
pressure, and not just from her husband.
At the level she occupies, MI6 and British
health authorities get into the act. It
is thought of as a matter of national
security.
Q: Well, it is "national security", once
you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is "global security". he
cartel operates in every nation. It
zealously guards the sanctity of
vaccines. Questioning these vaccines
is on the same level as a Vatican bishop
questioning the sanctity of the sacrament
of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity
stating publicly that he will not take a
vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully
to the medical cartel. here are several
reasons, but one of them is simply
that an actor who is famous can draw
a huge amount of publicity if he says
ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at
your demonstration against the FDA
in downtown Los Angeles. One or two
actors spoke against the FDA. Since that
124
time, you would be hard pressed to ind
an actor who has spoken out in any way
against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of
Health, what is the mood, what is the
basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research
monies. he last thing they think about
is challenging the status quo. hey are
already in an intramural war for that
money. hey don’t need more trouble.
his is a very insulated system. It
depends on the idea that, by and large,
modern medicine is very successful
on every frontier. To admit systemic
problems in any area is to cast doubt
on the whole enterprise. You might
therefore think that NIH is the last
place one should think about holding
demonstrations. But just the reverse is
true. If ive thousand people showed up
there demanding an accounting of the
actual beneits of that research system,
demanding to know what real health
beneits have been conferred on the
public from the billions of wasted dollars
funnelled to that facility, something
might start. A spark might go of. You
might get, with further demonstrations,
all sorts of fall-out. Researchers – a few
– might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to
the buildings as the police will allow.
People in business suits, in jogging suits,
mothers and babies. Well-of people.
Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined
destructive power of a number of
vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. here are
no real studies of any depth which have
been done on that. Again, the
assumption is made that vaccines are
safe, and therefore any number of
vaccines given together are safe as well.
But the truth is, vaccines are not safe.
herefore the potential damage increases
when you give many of them in a short
time period.
Q: hen we have the fall lu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do
these germs loat in to the US from Asia.
he public swallows that premise. If it
happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it
happens in October, it is the lu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all
those years in the vaccine ield?
A: Yes. But ater this interview, I’ll
regret it a little less. And I work in other
ways. I give out information to certain
people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is one thing you want the
public to understand?
A: hat the burden of proof in
establishing the safety and eicacy
of vaccines is on the people who
manufacture and license them for public
use. Just that. he burden of proof is not
on you or me. And for proof you need
well-designed long-term studies. You
need extensive follow-up. You need to
interview mothers and pay attention to
what mothers say about their babies and
what happens to them ater vaccination.
You need all these things. he things that
are not there.
Q: he things that are not there.
A: Yes.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I’d like
you to review, once more, the disease
problems that vaccines can cause. Which
diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two
potential harmful outcomes. One,
the person gets the disease from the
vaccine. He gets the disease which the
vaccine is supposed to protect him from.
Because, some version of the disease is
in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he
doesn’t get THAT disease, but at some
later time, maybe right away, maybe not,
he develops another condition which is
caused by the vaccine. hat condition
could be autism, what’s called autism,
or it could be some other disease like
meningitis. He could become mentally
disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the
relative frequency of these diferent
outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor.
We can only guess. If you ask, out of
a population of a hundred thousand
children who get a measles vaccine,
how many get the measles, and how
many develop other problems from the
vaccine, there is a no reliable answer.
hat is what I’m saying. Vaccines are
superstitions. And with superstitions,
you don’t get facts you can use. You only
get stories, most of which are designed
to enforce the superstition. But, from
many vaccine campaigns, we can piece
together a narrative that does reveal
some very disturbing things. People have
been harmed. he harm is real, and it
can be deep and it can mean death. he
harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we
have been led to believe. In the US, there
are groups of mothers who are testifying
about autism and childhood vaccines.
hey are coming forward and standing
up at meetings. hey are essentially
trying to ill in the gap that has been
created by the researchers and doctors
who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: How long did you work with
vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall
any good reason to say that vaccines are
successful?
A: No, I can’t. If I had a child now, the
last thing I would allow is vaccination.
“he burden of proof in
establishing the safety
and eicacy of vaccines
is on the people who
manufacture and license
them for public use.
Just that. he burden of
proof is not on you or
me. And for proof you
need well-designed long-
term studies. You need
extensive follow-up.”
I would move out of the state if I had
to. I would change the family name. I
would disappear. With my family. I’m
not saying it would come to that. here
are ways to side step the system with
grace, if you know how to act. here
are exemptions you can declare, in
every state, based on religious and/or
philosophic views. But if push came to
shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children
everywhere who do get vaccines and
appear to be healthy.
A: he operative word is “appear.”
What about all the children who can’t
focus on their studies? What about
the children who have tantrums from
time to time? What about the children
who are not quite in possession of all
their mental faculties? I know there
are many causes for these things, but
125
vaccines are one cause. I would not take
the chance. I see no reason to take the
chance. And frankly, I see no reason to
allow the government to have the last
word. Government medicine is, from
my experience, oten a contradiction in
terms. You get one or the other, but not
both.
Q: So we come to the level playing ield.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the
vaccines to take them. Allow the
dissidents to decline to take them. But,
as I said earlier, there is no level playing
ield if the ield is strewn with lies. And
when babies are involved, you have
parents making all the decisions. hose
parents need a heavy dose of truth. What
about the child I spoke of who died
from the DPT shot? What information
did his parents act on? I can tell you it
was heavily weighted. It was not real
information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with
the press, scare the hell out of parents
with dire scenarios about what will
happen if their kids don’t get shots.
A: hey make it seem a crime to refuse
the vaccine. hey equate it with bad
parenting. You ight that with better
information. It is always a challenge
to buck the authorities. And only you
can decide whether to do it. It is every
person’s responsibility to make up his
mind. he medical cartel likes that bet.
It is betting that the fear will win.
"Unless we put medical freedom into the
Constitution, the time will come when
medicine will organize into an undercover
dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing
to one class of men and deny equal
privileges to others will constitute the
Bastille of medical science. All such laws
are un–American and despotic and have
no place in a republic"
BENJAMIN RUSH (1746–1813), M.D.
UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, SIGNER OF THE AMERICAN
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
(Note: Dr Rush did not succeed - ed.)
his highly revealing interview was
conducted in 2002. Forwarded by Zeus
Information ServiceAlternative News for
Health Practitioners to subscribe contact
zeus.info@ntlworld.com
GOD’S TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Friends,
Please help us with this marketing
questionnaire for a new advertising campaign
of an old and trusted product. hank you.
God would like to thank you for your belief
and patronage. In order to better serve your
needs, He asks that you take a few moments
to answer the following questions. Please keep
in mind that your responses will be kept
completely conidential, and that you need
not disclose your name or address unless
you prefer a direct response to comments or
suggestions.
1. How did you ind out about God?
___ Newspaper
___ Bible
___ Torah
___ Book of Mormon
___ Koran
___ Other Book
___ Television
___ Divine Inspiration
___ Word of mouth
___ Dead Sea scrolls
___ My mama done tol’ me
___ Near Death Experience
___ Near-life experience
___ National Public Radio
___ Tabloid
___ Burning Shrubbery
___ Christian Rock Group
___ Other (specify): ____________
2. Which model God did you acquire?
___ Yahweh
___ Jehovah
___ Allah
___ Just plain God
___ Krishna
___ Father, Son & Holy Ghost (Trinity Pak)
___ Zeus and entourage (Olympus Pak)
___ Odin and entourage (Valhalla Pak)
___ Gaia/Mother Earth/Mother Nature
___ None of the above; I was taken in by a
false god
3. Did your God come to you undamaged, __ Jimmy Swaggart
with all parts in good working order and __ Crystals (not including Crystal Gayle)
with no obvious breakage or missing __ Human Sacriice
attributes?
__ Yes
__ No
If not, please describe the problems you
initially encountered here.
Please indicate all that apply:
___ Not eternal
___ Not omniscient
___ Not
omnipotent
___ Finite in space/Does not occupy or
inhabit the entire universe
___ Permits sex outside of marriage
___ Prohibits sex outside of marriage
___ Makes mistakes (Geraldo Rivera, Jesse
Helms)
___ When beseeched, doesn’t stay
beseeched
___ Requires burnt oferings
___ Requires virgin sacriices
___ Plays dice with the universe
4. What factors were relevant in your faith. Which would you prefer (circle one)?
decision to acquire a God?
Please check all that apply.
___ Indoctrinated by parents
___ Needed a reason to live
___ Indoctrinated by society
___ Needed target for rage
___ Imaginary friend grew up
___ Hate to think for self
___ Wanted to meet girls/boys
___ Fear of death
___ To piss of parents
___ Needed a day away from work
___ Enjoy organ music
___ Needed focus on whom to despise
___ Needed to feel morally superior
___ Graduated from the tooth fairy
___ My shrubbery caught ire and told me
to do it
5. Are you currently using any other source 1 2 3 4 5 AOL
of inspiration in addition to 1 2 3 4 5 Republican Congress
God? Please check all that apply.
__ Self-help books
__ Tarot, Astrology
__ Star Trek re-runs
__ Fortune cookies
__ Ann Landers
__ Psychic Friends Network
__ Dianetics
__ Playboy and/or Playgirl
__ Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll
__ Biorhythms
__ EST
__ Television
__ Mantras
__ Wandering around in desert
__ Burning shrubbery
__ Other:_____________________
6. Have you ever worshiped a false God 1 2 3 4 5 How are your shrubs doing?
before? Is so, which false God were you
fooled by? Please check all that apply.
___ Odin
___ Cthulhu
___ Lottery
___ Baal
126
___ Beelzebub
___ he Almighty Dollar
___ he Conservative Right
___ Mick Jagger
___ Bill Gates
___ he Great Pumpkin
___ Ronald Reagan
___ A burning cabbage
___ Mushrooms
___ Other: ________________
7. God employs a limited degree of Divine
Intervention to preserve the
balanced level of felt presence and blind
a. More Divine Intervention
b. Less Divine Intervention
c. Current level of Divine Intervention is
just right
d. Don’t know – what’s Divine Intervention?
8. God also attempts to maintain a balanced
level of disasters andmiracles. Please rate
on a scale of 1 to 5 God’s handling of the
following:
(1 unsatisfactory, 5 excellent):
Disaster:
1 2 3 4 5 lood
1 2 3 4 5 famine
1 2 3 4 5 earthquake
1 2 3 4 5 war
1 2 3 4 5 pestilence
1 2 3 4 5 plague
1 2 3 4 5 Jerry Lewis
1 2 3 4 5 Dubya
1 2 3 4 5 my last relationship
Miracles:
1 2 3 4 5 rescues
1 2 3 4 5 spontaneous remissions
1 2 3 4 5 crying statues
1 2 3 4 5 water changing to wine
1 2 3 4 5 walking on water
1 2 3 4 5 stars hovering over towns
1 2 3 4 5 VCRs that set their own clocks
1 2 3 4 5 clear and competent statements by
the President
1 2 3 4 5 my present relationship
9. Please rate the following on a scale of 1 to
5 (1 unsatisfactory, 5
excellent):
1 2 3 4 5 God’s Courtesy
1 2 3 4 5 answers to your prayers
1 2 3 4 5 Are your spiritual needs being met?
10. Do you have any additional comments
or suggestions for improving the quality
of God’s services? (Attach an additional
sheet(s) if necessary.)
 Biotech Industry
Discovered With Head Up
Its Own Ass
• Claims head up ass is a new kind of GE “yoga”
• “Huge business opportunities” predicted
• PM applauds “Knowledge Wave” effort

The Biotech Industry was discovered

today locked in an executive
washroom with its head up its ass,
claiming it was doing “research”
designed to “benefit mankind” and
“end starvation”.
A spokesperson refused to “confirm or deny”
that it was idiotic to pursue “head-up-its-ass”
research, but was adamant that the industry
had the right to commercially release “head-up-
its- ass” technology, contending that it was an
“important component of the Knowledge Wave”.

He went on to say that the Biotech Industry

is engaged in “really complicated important
science-type stuff” that “mere mortals like you”
could not possibly understand.

The industry, he said, believed that Helen Clark

was “totally on side” – as was Environment
Minister Marion “Booboo” Hobbs.

In fact, he said, Hobbs had actually given the

biotech industry the “basic idea” of “HUIA”
technology by demonstrating that someone can
be arrogant and stupid time after time and get
away with it with impunity.

He claimed that the Prime Minister had made

a few “inspired suggestions” for improvements,
such as keeping your eyes closed when your
head is up your ass.
“It seemed like such a simple, commonsense
thing, but we just hadn’t thought of it until the
Prime Minister suggested that we try it. “Her
input was ingenious. She would make a good
scientist, too,” he said.
The Prime Minister was not available for her reaction to this
compliment. Her office indicated that she had to be called away
to stonewall another GE contamination story and reassure the
country that no matter how much evidence there was on the
dangers of GE, she would not change her position.
“I will not waver, “ she said. “My eyes are closed.”

127