Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- I. INTRODUCTION
III. RESULT
Refer to table 1; there are 60.7% male respondents in Group 1 (therapy life review and therapy music) and 57.1% male
respondents in Group 2 (therapy music only). The equality test result between Group 1 and Group 2 is equivalent (p value > 0.05).
Refer to table 2; there are 67.8% total respondents who have no education and only graduate up to elementary school in
Group 1 and 82.1% total respondents in Group 2). The equality test result between Group 1 and Group 2 is equivalent (p value >
0.05).
Refer to table 4; there are 100% total respondents with Minangnese race in Group 1 and 96.4% respondents in Group 2. The
equality test result between Group 1 and Group 2 is equivalent (p value > 0.05).
Refer to table 5; in group 1, average age of respondents is 78.14, with age 64 as the youngest and age 95 as the oldest.
Meanwhile in group 2, average age of respondents is 72.44, with age 50 as the youngest and 89 age as the oldest. The equality test
result between Group 1 and Group 2 is equivalent (p value > 0.05)
Refer to table 6; in Group 1, average duration of respondents stay in institution is 4.24 years, with 1 year as minimum
duration and 12 years as maximum duration. Meanwhile in Group 2, average duration of respondents stay in institution is 4.27
years, with 1 year as minimum duration and 15 years as maximum duration. The equality test result between Group 1 and Group 2
is equivalent (p value > 0.05).
The equality test result between Group 1 and Group 2 is equivalent (p value > 0.05).
8. Result for Group 1 cognitive abilities before and after intervention stage
9. Result for Group 2 cognitive abilities before and after intervention stage
There is improvement of cognitive abilities in Group 2 after only Therapy Music in average as much as 2.0715 higher (P
value < 0.05).
10. Result for cognitive abilities of Group 1 after Life Review and Music therapy and Group 2 after only Music Therapy
Table 10. Result cognitive abilities of Group 1 and Group2 after intervention stage (n=56)
Refer to table 10; there is different result in cognitive abilities gained after the therapy session between Group 1 and Group
2, with p value = 0.001 (P value < 0.05). Improvement of cognitive abilities in Group 1 after intervention stage is higher compare
to Group 2 which only has only music therapy without life review therapy.
11. Relation between characteristic age of respondent with cognitive abilities after intervention stage
There is improvement of cognitive abilities after Life Review therapy and Music therapy (P value < 0.05).
12. Relation between characteristic duration stay in institution of respondent in with cognitive abilities after intervention stage
There is no relation between improvements of cognitive abilities after intervention with duration stay in institution (P value
> 0.05).
13. Relation between characteristic gender of respondent with cognitive abilities after intervention stage
The result is P value > 0.05, means there is relation between improvements of cognitive abilities after intervention with
gender of respondents.