Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contributor Disclosures
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Feb 2019. | This topic last updated: May 21, 2018.
INTRODUCTION
Syphilis is an infection caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum. During the initial
phase of infection, the organism disseminates widely, setting the stage for subsequent
manifestations. If untreated, syphilis can have a number of significant late adverse
outcomes, including cardiovascular, gummatous, and neurologic complications. The
management of syphilis is based upon its classification into stages of disease: early
syphilis (includes primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis); late (includes late latent,
cardiovascular, and gummatous syphilis); and neurosyphilis (includes central nervous
system disease and ocular syphilis at any time).
The treatment of syphilis in nonpregnant adults and patient monitoring after treatment
will be reviewed here. Other topics related to the treatment of syphilis are discussed
elsewhere:
Our approach to the treatment of nonpregnant adults with syphilis are consistent with
the 2015 guidelines from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) [1]. Discussions of the treatment of syphilis in the setting of HIV infection and
pregnancy, as well as congenital syphilis, are found elsewhere. (See "Syphilis in the
HIV-infected patient" and "Congenital syphilis: Evaluation, management, and
prevention" and "Syphilis in pregnancy", section on 'Maternal treatment'.)
Pre-treatment evaluation — Patients with signs and symptoms consistent with syphilis
should undergo serologic testing to confirm the diagnosis. However, certain groups of
patients can be treated empirically for early syphilis based upon clinical findings (eg,
patients with a suspected chancre) or a known recent exposure, especially if they are
unlikely to follow up. (See "Syphilis: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical
manifestations in HIV-uninfected patients", section on 'Primary syphilis (chancre)' and
'Treatment of early syphilis' below.)
A nontreponemal serologic test should be obtained just before initiating therapy (ideally,
on the first day of treatment) to establish the pre-treatment titer. Since nontreponemal
titers can increase significantly between the date of diagnosis and the date of treatment,
this test is critical to establishing the adequacy of the post-treatment serologic
response. (See "Syphilis: Screening and diagnostic testing", section on 'Serologic tests'
and 'Patient monitoring' below.)
In all types of syphilis, prolonged continuous levels of penicillin are necessary for the
elimination of treponemes [4]. However, the dosage, formulation, and duration of
Bicillin L-A must be distinguished from Bicillin C-R (which contains equal concentrations
of procaine and benzathine penicillin), which should not be used to treat patients with
syphilis. Bicillin C-R results in detectable serum drug levels for only seven days.
Inadvertent use of this shorter-acting preparation in a Los Angeles sexually transmitted
disease clinic led to a large-scale public health investigation and retesting and
retreatment of a significant number of patients [5]. The Bicillin C-R product is now
labeled with a warning: "not for the treatment of syphilis." This agent is typically used for
the treatment of susceptible streptococci. (See "Treatment and prevention of
streptococcal pharyngitis", section on 'Antibiotic treatment'.)
Patients who are allergic to penicillin — If a patient is allergic to penicillin, the choice
of agent is less clear. Options include:
Patients should generally be tested for allergy and desensitized to or rechallenged with
penicillin if they are pregnant, or present with neurosyphilis, cardiovascular
manifestations of late syphilis, and/or treatment failure. Patients with a history of an
immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction require desensitization. For patients with a
history of a delayed-type reaction, some can be rechallenged with penicillin, while
others should have skin testing prior to being re-exposed. Detailed discussions of the
management of patients with a penicillin allergy are found elsewhere. (See "Penicillin
allergy: Immediate reactions" and "Penicillin allergy: Delayed hypersensitivity
reactions".)
The goals of treatment for early syphilis are to prevent long-term adverse outcomes of
infection and reduce transmission to others. Early syphilis refers to primary, secondary,
and early latent syphilis. A diagnosis of early syphilis implies that T. pallidum infection
occurred within the previous year.
● Early latent – Latent syphilis refers to the period when a patient is infected with T.
pallidum, as demonstrated by serologic testing, but has no symptoms. Early latent
syphilis by definition occurs within the first year of initial infection. Patients
diagnosed with early latent syphilis should be considered to be potentially
infectious. (See "Syphilis: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical
manifestations in HIV-uninfected patients", section on 'Latent syphilis
(asymptomatic)' and "Syphilis: Screening and diagnostic testing", section on 'Latent
syphilis'.)
Preferred regimens for early syphilis — A single dose of penicillin G benzathine (2.4
million units intramuscularly [IM]) is standard therapy for most patients with primary,
secondary, and early latent syphilis (table 1) [1,7]. Long-acting benzathine penicillin
should only be given via the IM route [4]. (See 'Penicillin as the treatment of choice'
above.)
The use of single-dose treatment of early syphilis was supported in a systematic review,
which included data from two large randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of a
single dose of 2.4 million units of IM benzathine penicillin for the treatment of primary
and secondary syphilis [2,11,12]. Clinical cure rates were 90 to 100 percent for both
HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected persons. In addition, data from the 1950s suggested
that long-acting depot penicillin therapy for early syphilis prevented subsequent
development of late syphilis, including neurosyphilis [13,14]. Several studies have
evaluated "enhanced" therapy with additional doses of benzathine penicillin and found
no additional benefit [15-17].
For patients requiring an alternative regimen (such as when benzathine penicillin is not
available) who are not allergic to penicillin, oral amoxicillin with probenecid can be used
(amoxicillin 3 g plus probenecid 500 mg orally, both given twice daily for 14 days).
However, this regimen requires prolonged oral dosing in addition to probenecid. This
regimen was evaluated in Japan (where benzathine penicillin is not available) in a
retrospective observational study of 286 HIV-infected persons presenting with all stages
of syphilis [25]. The treatment duration was 14 to 30 days, and successful treatment
was defined as at least a fourfold decline in nontreponemal titer. Approximately 95
percent of patients with early syphilis were successfully treated with this regimen.
Ceftriaxone can also be used to treat early syphilis [26,27]; however, some patients who
Late syphilis includes tertiary syphilis and late latent syphilis, and such patients require
a longer duration of treatment compared with those who have early syphilis. Patients
with neurologic manifestations should be treated for neurosyphilis. (See 'Treatment of
neurosyphilis' below.)
● Tertiary – Tertiary syphilis refers to patients with late syphilis who have
symptomatic manifestations involving the cardiovascular system or gummatous
diseases (usually of the skin and subcutaneous tissues). (See "Syphilis:
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations in HIV-uninfected
patients", section on 'Late syphilis'.)
● Late latent – Latent syphilis refers to the period when a patient is infected with T.
pallidum, as demonstrated by serologic testing, but has no symptoms. Late latent
syphilis by definition occurs more than one year after initial infection. If the timing of
an infection is not known, late latent syphilis is presumed [34]. Transmission is
unlikely to occur in this stage of disease. (See "Syphilis: Screening and diagnostic
testing", section on 'Latent syphilis' and "Syphilis: Epidemiology, pathophysiology,
and clinical manifestations in HIV-uninfected patients", section on 'Latent syphilis
(asymptomatic)'.)
● Late latent syphilis – Patients with late latent syphilis should be treated with three
doses of penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units IM) once a week for three weeks
(table 1) [1].
Alternative regimens for late syphilis — For patients without neurosyphilis who are
allergic to penicillin, we test for penicillin allergy and then desensitize if testing is
positive. If desensitization is not possible, we generally use doxycycline or ceftriaxone
(if the patient can be safely treated with other beta-lactam drugs). (See "Allergy
evaluation for immediate penicillin allergy: Skin test-based diagnostic strategies and
● For those with late latent syphilis, doxycycline 100 mg PO twice daily for 28 days
should be administered [1].
There are very limited data on the efficacy of these regimens in late syphilis, and
therefore, we closely monitor the response to therapy [37,38]. (See 'Patient monitoring'
below.)
TREATMENT OF NEUROSYPHILIS
Neurosyphilis can occur at any time during the course of infection. Patients with early
neurosyphilis typically present with ocular disease, cranial nerve dysfunction (especially
auditory or facial nerve involvement), or meningitis. Later in disease, the most common
forms involve the brain and spinal cord parenchyma (general paresis and tabes
dorsalis) (table 1). (See "Neurosyphilis", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)
Patients with neurosyphilis should generally be treated with intravenous (IV) therapy.
The rationale for using IV rather than intramuscular (IM) therapy includes:
● The dose of IM benzathine penicillin that is administered for other stages of syphilis
does not produce measurable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of the drug [39].
● Several case reports of HIV-infected patients treated with benzathine penicillin who
subsequently developed symptomatic neurosyphilis have been published; in some
instances, viable T. pallidum were demonstrated in CSF after therapy
For patients with late disease, we generally administer a single dose of penicillin G
benzathine (2.4 million units IM) after completion of IV penicillin since the duration of
treatment for neurosyphilis is shorter than the regimens used for late syphilis. This
approach is based upon the pathophysiology of the organism, the required drug levels
needed to eradicate the organism in later stages of disease, and the overall safety of
the drug. However, there are no clinical trial data to support any firm recommendations.
Some specialists administer three weekly doses of benzathine penicillin 2.4 million units
IM after completion of the neurosyphilis regimen [1]. Although this approach is also
reasonable, patient follow-up for the full course of therapy may be challenging.
Shortages of the drug may also compromise this approach.
On rare occasion, we treat HIV-uninfected patients with mild neurologic symptoms and
a questionable diagnosis of neurosyphilis the same way we treat those with other forms
of late syphilis (ie, three weekly doses of benzathine penicillin 2.4 million units IM).
Such patients are typically elderly patients with mild cognitive deficits consistent with
early dementia, where the risk and inconvenience of sampling CSF and/or
administering IV therapy may exceed the risk of undertreated neurosyphilis. If
symptoms are more specific for neurosyphilis, IV penicillin can be given even when
CSF sampling cannot be done.
● Procaine penicillin (2.4 million units IM once daily) plus probenecid (500 mg orally
four times a day) both for 10 to 14 days [1]. Although this combination provides
higher serum levels than benzathine penicillin, CSF levels of penicillin are often are
not detectable, and this regimen has not been well studied for the treatment of
neurosyphilis [42]. In addition, IM procaine penicillin can be painful, therefore,
patient willingness to complete the full course of therapy is variable.
● Ceftriaxone (2 g IV daily for 10 to 14 days) if the patient can be safely treated with
other beta-lactam drugs. (See "Allergy evaluation for immediate penicillin allergy:
Skin test-based diagnostic strategies and cross-reactivity with other beta-lactam
antibiotics".)
Doxycycline (200 mg orally twice daily) for 21 days is also an alternative approach, but
should be reserved for exceptional circumstances. This regimen has very limited
supporting data [43] and is not recommended by the United States Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention [34].
PATIENT MONITORING
Patients should be monitored clinically and with laboratory testing to ensure they are
responding appropriately to therapy.
There is no way to prevent this reaction. Patients should be informed of the possible
signs and symptoms and advised to contact their clinicians if a severe reaction occurs.
Although these symptoms often resolve without intervention within 12 to 24 hours, non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) or other antipyretics can be used if
symptoms arise and they may reduce the severity of symptoms and the duration of the
reaction.
Clinical assessment — Patients with early syphilis should be assessed clinically for
resolution of symptoms (eg, rash, ulcer). However, for patients with late stage
cardiovascular or noncutaneous gummatous disease, a significant change in symptoms
is unlikely. For individuals with symptomatic neurosyphilis, serial neurological
examinations should be performed every six months.
Since T. pallidum cannot be cultured in the laboratory, the success of treatment must be
inferred through this indirect measure. Although definitive criteria for cure or failure have
not been established, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has suggested definitions to assess the patient's response to treatment [1]. A
description of the types of serologic tests used to diagnose and monitor syphilis is found
elsewhere. (See "Syphilis: Screening and diagnostic testing", section on 'Serologic
tests'.)
Serofast state — Patients who have had an adequate (≥fourfold) decline in titers,
but whose nontreponemal titers do not serorevert or continue to fall after 24 months of
monitoring, are considered serofast. The serofast state is seen in approximately 15 to
20 percent of patients with early syphilis and has been reported to be as high as 35
percent in patients with late latent syphilis [51-53]. Generally the nontreponemal titer
stabilizes at a low level (eg, a titer of <1:8), but higher serofast titers are occasionally
seen, particularly in HIV-infected patients. Individuals who are serofast should be tested
for HIV infection, since the serofast state can be the result of immunodysregulation of
antibody production [1].
Treatment failure — Persons with syphilis are considered to have treatment failure
if nontreponemal titers do not decline fourfold or greater or if there is a documented
fourfold increase after initial decline. Treatment failure should be distinguished from
reinfection. (See 'Management of treatment failure' below.)
How often to monitor — A nontreponemal titer should be obtained just before initiating
therapy (ideally, on the first day of treatment) since titers can increase significantly over
a few days between diagnosis of syphilis and treatment initiation. The subsequent
● Patients with late syphilis (including late latent syphilis) should undergo follow-up
serologic testing at 6, 12, and 24 months, as some patients with late syphilis may
not have an adequate response for up to two years following treatment.
● Patients with HIV are typically monitored more frequently. The management of HIV-
infected patients with syphilis is discussed elsewhere. (See "Syphilis in the HIV-
infected patient".)
Patients who have had an adequate response to therapy may still have a detectable
nontreponemal titer following treatment. For such patients, we continue to monitor the
nontreponemal titer every six months until seroreversion of the nontreponemal test has
occurred, or the patient is considered to be serofast (see 'Serofast state' above). After
identifying a patient as serofast, we generally repeat nontreponemal tests every six
months for one to two years to assess for stability, and then at increasing intervals (eg,
annually) to assess for possible late failure or reinfection.
Antibody titers decline at varying rates following treatment, depending upon the stage of
infection and the magnitude of the pre-treatment titer. Patients with early syphilis may
experience more rapid relative declines in RPR titers than patients with late syphilis. As
an example, in a systematic review, serologic response to treatment was typically seen
by six months in patients with early syphilis, but generally demonstrated a slower
decline (12 to 24 months) in patients with late latent disease [2]. Other factors that may
slow the rate at which titers decline following therapy include prior episodes of syphilis,
the duration of infection prior to therapy, and the presence of HIV coinfection [37,49].
Persons with syphilis are suspected of treatment failure if nontreponemal titers do not
decline fourfold or greater, or if there is a documented fourfold increase after an initial
decline. Additional discussions of treatment failure in patients with neurosyphilis and
HIV are found elsewhere. (See 'Serologic testing' above and 'How often to monitor'
above and "Neurosyphilis", section on 'Monitoring' and "Syphilis in the HIV-infected
patient", section on 'Approach to treatment failure'.)
● We first assess the patient to see if there is a history of possible new exposure or
clinical evidence of a new infection (eg, chancre, rash). In addition, we repeat
testing for HIV.
• Neurologic symptoms
• Persons treated for late latent syphilis with an initially high titer (≥1:32) that
fails to decline at least fourfold within 12 to 24 months of treatment
If the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is abnormal, then the patient needs a treatment
course for neurosyphilis. (See 'Treatment of neurosyphilis' above.)
If the CSF is unremarkable, but there continues to be concern for treatment failure,
we retreat the patient with another course of therapy. This should be accomplished
with a regimen recommended for late syphilis, even if the initial presentation was
early syphilis. Such patients who failed an alternative regimen should be
reassessed to see if penicillin can be administered. In the case of reported
penicillin allergy, testing for true allergy should be pursued, and if present, the
patient should undergo desensitization.
After the patient has been retreated, we continue close clinical and serologic
follow-up (eg, every six months) and determine the need for additional evaluation
and management based upon subsequent changes in nontreponemal titers.
When an alternative regimen has been used because of a reported penicillin allergy
and treatment response is inadequate (ie, nontreponemal titers fail to decline fourfold
within 12 months of treatment), it is reasonable to test for penicillin allergy and consider
treatment with penicillin G benzathine in those whose allergy testing is negative. If
treatment with penicillin is not possible, the management plan should be formulated on
a case-by-case basis; the primary options are to continue monitoring nontreponemal
titers closely (and retreat if the titer increases) or to perform an LP to evaluate for
neurosyphilis. An additional discussion of the treatment of patients who are allergic to
penicillin is found above. (See 'Patients who are allergic to penicillin' above.)
For patients with neurosyphilis and evidence of treatment failure, retreatment usually
requires 14 days of intravenous penicillin G. There is no evidence that longer courses of
treatment or use of different antibiotics changes the outcome.
There is no vaccine for syphilis. Thus, persons exposed sexually to a partner who has
syphilis in any stage should be evaluated clinically and serologically for evidence of
infection.
● If the patient has clinical evidence of syphilis, treatment is tailored to the specific
manifestation as summarized in the table (table 1) and described in more detail
above. (See 'Treatment of early syphilis' above and 'Treatment of neurosyphilis'
above.)
● For those who are asymptomatic, we treat empirically for early syphilis if the patient
had condomless oral, anal, or vaginal sex with:
• A sex partner who was diagnosed with primary, secondary, or early latent
syphilis within the preceding 90 days.
• A sex partner who was diagnosed with late latent syphilis within the preceding
90 days if the partner had a high nontreponemal titer (eg, >1:32). A high
serologic titer is often associated with early infection, and the patient may have
been misdiagnosed with late disease when in fact infection occurred more
recently.
● For asymptomatic patients who were exposed to a sex partner with syphilis more
than 90 days preceding their partner’s diagnosis, we generally determine the need
for treatment based upon the results of baseline serologic testing. However, if
serologic testing is not readily available, or if follow up is uncertain, we treat
empirically. The specific treatment regimen depends upon when the patient was
exposed (ie, early versus late latent syphilis). In general, we prefer to treat persons
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond
the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th
to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might
have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general
overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient
education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are
written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-
depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you
to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education
articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of
interest.)
● Penicillin is the treatment of choice for all stages of syphilis (table 1). For patients
who are allergic to penicillin, alternative agents include tetracyclines, ceftriaxone,
and azithromycin. However, we only use azithromycin if no other options are
available due to concerns of treatment failure associated with macrolide resistance.
(See 'General approach to antimicrobial therapy' above.)
● For nonpregnant adults with early syphilis (primary, secondary, and early latent
syphilis) without evidence of neurosyphilis, we recommend a single dose of
penicillin G benzathine (2.4 million units intramuscularly [IM]) rather than an
extended course of penicillin therapy (Grade 2B). For patients who are allergic to
penicillin, we suggest doxycycline for 14 days rather than another agent (Grade
2C). (See 'Treatment of early syphilis' above.)
● The frequency of serologic monitoring depends upon the stage of disease and
presence of HIV coinfection (see 'How often to monitor' above):
• Patients with HIV are typically monitored more frequently. This is discussed in
a separate topic review. (See "Syphilis in the HIV-infected patient".)
● Patients with neurosyphilis should undergo clinical and serologic monitoring at the
same frequency as patients without neurosyphilis. Monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid
abnormalities may also be warranted. (See "Neurosyphilis", section on
'Monitoring'.)
REFERENCES
1. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually
transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015;
64:1.
2. Clement ME, Okeke NL, Hicks CB. Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review.
JAMA 2014; 312:1905.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Inadvertent use of Bicillin C-R
to treat syphilis infection--Los Angeles, California, 1999-2004. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54:217.
12. Rolfs RT, Joesoef MR, Hendershot EF, et al. A randomized trial of enhanced
therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency
virus infection. The Syphilis and HIV Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:307.
13. Swartz MN, Healy BP, Musher DM. Late syphilis. In: Sexually Transmitted Diseas
es, Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, et al (Eds), McGraw Hill, New York City 1
999. p.487.
14. Scheck DN, Hook EW 3rd. Neurosyphilis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1994; 8:769.
15. Taiwan HIV and Syphilis Study Group. Comparison of effectiveness of 1 dose vers
us 3 doses of benzathine penicillin in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected
patients: Prospective observational study in Taiwan [abstract S-119]. In: Conferen
ce on Retroviruses and Opportu- nistic Infections, Atlanta, GA, 3–6 March 2013.
16. Cousins DE, Taylor M, Lee V. The outcome of treatment of early syphilis with
different benzathine penicillin regimens in HIV-infected and -uninfected patients.
Int J STD AIDS 2012; 23:632.
17. Ganesan A, Mesner O, Okulicz JF, et al. A single dose of benzathine penicillin G
is as effective as multiple doses of benzathine penicillin G for the treatment of
HIV-infected persons with early syphilis. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:653.
21. Psomas KC, Brun M, Causse A, et al. Efficacy of ceftriaxone and doxycycline in
the treatment of early syphilis. Med Mal Infect 2012; 42:15.
22. Long CM, Klausner JD, Leon S, et al. Syphilis treatment and HIV infection in a
population-based study of persons at high risk for sexually transmitted
disease/HIV infection in Lima, Peru. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:151.
23. Onoda Y. [Therapeutic effect of oral doxycycline on syphilis (author's transl]. Jpn J
Antibiot 1980; 33:18.
24. Harshan V, Jayakumar W. Doxycycline in early syphilis: a long term follow up.
Indian J Dermatol 1982; 27:119.
25. Tanizaki R, Nishijima T, Aoki T, et al. High-dose oral amoxicillin plus probenecid is
highly effective for syphilis in patients with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2015;
61:177.
26. Smith NH, Musher DM, Huang DB, et al. Response of HIV-infected patients with
asymptomatic syphilis to intensive intramuscular therapy with ceftriaxone or
procaine penicillin. Int J STD AIDS 2004; 15:328.
28. Hook EW 3rd, Roddy RE, Handsfield HH. Ceftriaxone therapy for incubating and
early syphilis. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:881.
29. Hook EW 3rd, Behets F, Van Damme K, et al. A phase III equivalence trial of
azithromycin versus benzathine penicillin for treatment of early syphilis. J Infect
30. Bai ZG, Wang B, Yang K, Tian JH, Ma B, Liu Y, Jiang L, Gai QY, He X, LiY. Azithro
mycin versus penicillin G benzathine for early syphilis. Cochrane Database of Sys
tematic Reviews 2012, Issue 6. Art No.: CD007270.
31. Martin IE, Gu W, Yang Y, Tsang RS. Macrolide resistance and molecular types of
Treponema pallidum causing primary syphilis in Shanghai, China. Clin Infect Dis
2009; 49:515.
33. Marra CM, Colina AP, Godornes C, et al. Antibiotic selection may contribute to
increases in macrolide-resistant Treponema pallidum. J Infect Dis 2006;
194:1771.
34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. STD Surveillance case definitions. ht
tp://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/CaseDefinitions-2014.pdf (Accessed on March 21, 201
4).
35. Ghanem KG. Management of Adult Syphilis: Key Questions to Inform the 2015
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61 Suppl 8:S818.
37. Hook EW 3rd, Marra CM. Acquired syphilis in adults. N Engl J Med 1992;
326:1060.
38. Augenbraun MH. Treatment of syphilis 2001: nonpregnant adults. Clin Infect Dis
2002; 35:S187.
40. Gordon SM, Eaton ME, George R, et al. The response of symptomatic
neurosyphilis to high-dose intravenous penicillin G in patients with human
immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1469.
42. van der Valk PG, Kraai EJ, van Voorst Vader PC, et al. Penicillin concentrations in
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during repository treatment regimen for syphilis.
Genitourin Med 1988; 64:223.
43. Yim CW, Flynn NM, Fitzgerald FT. Penetration of oral doxycycline into the
cerebrospinal fluid of patients with latent or neurosyphilis. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 1985; 28:347.
44. Yang CJ, Lee NY, Lin YH, et al. Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction after penicillin
therapy among patients with syphilis in the era of the hiv infection epidemic:
incidence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:976.
47. Pound MW, May DB. Proposed mechanisms and preventative options of Jarisch-
Herxheimer reactions. J Clin Pharm Ther 2005; 30:291.
48. Seña AC, Zhang XH, Li T, et al. A systematic review of syphilis serological
treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the
significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after
therapy. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:479.
50. Augenbraun M, Rolfs R, Johnson R, et al. Treponemal specific tests for the
serodiagnosis of syphilis. Syphilis and HIV Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1998;
25:549.
52. Li J, Wang LN, Zheng HY. Predictors of serological cure and serofast state after
treatment in HIV-negative patients with early syphilis in China. Sex Transm Infect
2013; 89:69.
53. Fiumara NJ. Serologic responses to treatment of 128 patients with late latent
syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 1979; 6:243.